No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Temple City Healthcare

5101 Tyler Avenue, Temple City, CA 91780 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 59 certified beds · (626) 443-3028 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (626) 443-3028 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0607, F0609) — most recent Apr 2026
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
4901 Santa Anita Ave · (626) 652-6915 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
140 E Live Oak Ave
Park
52 E Live Oak Ave · (626) 294-2988 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4900 Kings Row · (626) 448-0767

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.5%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.8%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.9%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection6.0%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.4%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.6%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.8%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.6%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control2.1%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.2%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.6%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.3%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.1%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days4.032.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.231.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
54.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.42U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.23hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 54.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.9%CMS range 36.0–65.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 6.2–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge54.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge76.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge29.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified88.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 3.8–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.65
RN hours/ resident / day
1.27
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.93
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.85
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
33.8%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 52.4 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.93 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.08 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

23
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-17)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain comfortable water temperature between 100 degrees Fahrenheit ( F) - 110 F in 2 of 3 shower rooms. In the Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] the temperature was 90 F and the Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] the temperature was 97 F, and the water temperature in the sink in Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] was 74 F. This deficient practice resulted in the resident's complaint of uncomfortable and discomfort when showering. Findings: During a review of Resident 10's admission Record the admission record indicated Resident 10 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including encephalopathy (damage or disease that affects the brain), muscle weakness, Parkinsons disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements). During a review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 12/30/2025, indicated that Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to increase, prevent, or maintain ambulation by failing to provide range of motion ([ROM] full movement potential of a joint) and/or ambulation (the act of walking) services to five of seven residents (Resident 33, 10, 3, 6, and 18) reviewed for limited ROM and mobility (ability to move): 1. For Resident 33 the resident failed to: a. Restorative Nurse Assistant (RNA) failed to report to the licensed staff and Director of Nursing (DON 1) the decline in Resident 33's ability to ambulate from January to April 2026. b.Minimum Data Set Nurse Coordinator (MDSNC) failed to inaccurately code that Resident 33's was able to ambulate after she assessed the resident as not able to ambulate. c.The licensed Staff and the MDSNC did not report to the physician that Resident 33's decline in ambulation from January to April 2026. As a result of this deficient practice Resident 33's mobility declined and limited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff of Restorative Nursing Aide ([RNA] nursing aide program that helps residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) staff as indicated in the Facility Assessment Tool (assessment of the resident population to determine sufficient staffing) to provide treatment to 26 residents of 53 (total residents in the facility) residents receiving RNA services,This failure resulted in the inability to provide RNA services to the residents in accordance with the physician's order. Cross reference F688 and F842. Findings: During a review of the Facility Assessment Tool, dated 1/13/2026 and updated 3/25/2026, the Facility Assessment Tool indicated two RNAs staff were needed to provide support and care for the residents. During a review of the Nursing Staff Assignment and Sign-in Sheet, dated 3/4/2026, 3/5/2026, 3/6/2026, 3/19/2026, 3/20/2026 the assignment for Restorative Nursing Aide 1 (RNA 1) included providing RNA, covering the guard, and feeding one resident, there was not two RNAs in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 3 out of 3 Restorative Nurse Assistants (RNA 1, RNA 2, RNA 3) had the competent skills necessary to care for one of ten sampled residents (Resident 33) who declined in ambulation (walking) as identified through resident assessment and described in the care plan and the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Competency Evaluation. This deficient practice resulted in resident not receiving needed services in a timely manner resulting in the resident's decline with the ability to ambulate (walk) that could affect resident's quality of life. Findings: During a review of, Physical Therapy Discharge Summary, dated 11/5/2025, the Physical Therapy Discharge Summary indicated that Resident 33 was ambulating with Front wheel walker (FWW - an assisting device with front wheels to assist in ambulation) up to 50 feet with partial/moderate assistance. During a review of Resident 33's Order Summary Report dated 11/3/2025, the order summary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of seven residents (Resident 18, 10, 3, and 6) reviewed for limited range of motion ([ROM] full movement potential of a joint) and mobility (ability to move) had complete and accurate medical records. 1. For Resident 18, the facility: a. Indicated Resident 18 received active assistive range of motion ([AAROM] use of muscles surrounding the joint to perform the exercise but requires some help from a person or equipment) to the left arm and passive range of motion ([PROM] movement of a joint through the range of motion with no effort from person) to the right arm followed by the application of the right hand roll (soft roll positioned in the palm of the hand and fastened with a strap) from 2/26/2026 to 2/28/2026 when Resident 18 was in the hospital. b. Indicated Resident 18 received PROM to both legs and application of both knee orthoses (also known as splints, material used to restrict, protect, or immobilize a part of the body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program (QAPI, a data-driven, proactive framework used to improve safety, resident care, and quality of life) as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) for QAPI when the facility's QAPI program did not identify issues related requirement for F688, F656, F678 and F638 identified by the survey team. This deficient practice resulted in the resident's care and needs not to receive or received delayed care to achieve their highest potential. Cross reference to F-636, F-656, F-678, F-688 Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/16/2026 at 1:13 PM with the Administrator (ADM), the facility's QAPI program was reviewed. The ADM stated that the facility's QAPI program topics of discussions are focused on two topics: resident falls and infection control. The ADM stated that the QAPI program has not identified any issues regarding the facility's staffing, development of care plans, Restorative Nursing Program, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow and implement its infection control practices in accordance with the facility's policies and procedures (P&P) titled Scope of Infection Control Program, dated July 2022, by failing to: 1. Ensure that Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 7 used personal protective equipment (PPE, isolation gown, gloves, masks to minimize exposure to hazards that cause injuries or infection) such as an isolation gown while providing care to Resident 3, who was placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control strategy in nursing homes requiring staff to wear gowns and gloves during high-contact care for residents at risk for harboring multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO, germs that are resistant to many antibiotics]) on 4/13/2026. 2. Ensure that CNA 1 washed his hands prior to feeding Resident 18 during a dining observation on 4/13/2026. 3. Ensure that Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA) 1 donned (put on) PPE while performing Range of Motion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow obtain informed consent prior to administration of psychotropic medications (medication that affects mood and behavior) for two out of five sampled residents (Resident 8 and Resident 11) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Informed Consent (a process in which a healthcare professional educates a patient about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a given treatment) dated 12/2018. This deficient practice had the potential to violate the rights of the residents and responsible party to be informed prior to administering medications without their knowledge or approval. a. During a review of Resident 8's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated that the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (brain disorder that slowly destroys a person's memory and thinking skills), psychosis (a mental disorder characterized when an individual loses touch with reality), and anxiety (mental health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the interdisciplinary team (IDT - a coordinated group of experts from several different fields who work together) conducted an assessment for one of ten sampled residents (Resident 65) to determine the resident's ability to safely self-administer medications, identify which medications could be self-administered, and determine whether the medications could be kept at the bedside. This deficient practice increased the resident's risk of missing doses, double dosing due to taking medications at incorrect times, and improperly mixing medications. The deficient practice had a potential for other residents to access or share the resident's medications if they were not stored securely. Findings: During a review of Resident 65's admission Record (AR) the AR indicated Resident 65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 65's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 4/14/2026, the OSR indicated Resident 65 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report a significant change of condition to the physician and/or the responsible party for two of seven residents (Resident 33 and 3) reviewed for limited range of motion ([ROM] full movement potential of a joint) and mobility (ability to move) by failing to: 1. Notify the licensed nurse of Resident 3's decline of ROM in the left hand during ROM exercises for approximately one month, after performing the Joint Mobility Assessment ([JMA] brief assessment of a resident's range of motion in each joint of both arms and legs) on 4/7/2026, and after an observation with the Restorative Nursing Aide ([RNA] nursing aide program that helps residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) and Occupational Therapist ([OT] professional aimed to increase or maintain a person's capability of participating in everyday life activities [occupations]) on 4/15/2026. 2. Notify the licensed nurse of Resident 33's decline in mobility and stopped…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent unnecessary use of psychotropic medication (any medication that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) for two out of five sampled residents (Resident 8 and Resident 11) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, dated 6/2021 by failing to: 1.Ensure Resident 8's physician order for Lorazepam (a medication used to manage anxiety (mental health condition that cause fear, dread and other symptoms) included the resident's symptom or behavior for the facility staff to monitor. 2. Ensure Resident 11's behavior that associated with the use of Quetiapine Fumarate (a medication used to manage schizophrenia [a mental health condition that affects how people think, feel and behave]) was monitored. As a result of the failure, the facility placed the residents at risk for experiencing side effects of the medication and prolonged use of the medication that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a federally mandated resident assessment tool) for two of seven residents (Resident 3 and 10) reviewed for limited range of motion ([ROM] full movement potential of a joint) and mobility (ability to move). This failure also resulted in delayed transmission of Resident 3 and 10's MDS assessments to the Federal database. Cross reference F657 and F688. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 3 on 12/27/2025 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure (sudden inability of the lunch to provide oxygen to the blood or remove [NAME] dioxide) with hypercapnia (abnormally high levels of carbon dioxide), attention to gastrostomy ([G-tube] surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feeding to be administered directly to the stomach for people with swallowing problems), dementia (progressive state of decline in mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess two of seven sampled residents (Resident 33 and 6) with limited range of motion ([ROM] full movement potential of a joint) and mobility (ability to move) on the ([MDS] a federally mandated resident assessment tool) by failing to: 1. Accurately assess Resident 33's MDS for entries related to related to Restorative Nursing Programs (nursing aide program in which Restorative Nursing Assistants [RNA] help residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) to reflect the current programs performed. 2. Accurately assess Resident 6's functional limitation in range of motion (limited ability to move a joint that interferes with daily functioning or places a resident at risk for injury). This failure had the potential to affect the provision of intervention to address Resident 33 and 6's mobility and ROM limitations and provided inaccurate information to the Federal database. Cross reference F688. Findings: 1.During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) for the development of care plans for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 38) when: The facility did not develop a care plan to address the communication needs of Resident 38, a resident who did not speak English. This deficient practice placed the residents to not receive resident specific care and services according their individual needs. During a review of Resident 38's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated that the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension (elevated blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (elevated blood sugar levels), and repeated falls. The AR also indicated that the resident's primary language is not English. During a review of Resident 38's History and Physical (H&P), dated 3/30/2026, the H&P indicated that the resident does have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 38's Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise and update the care plan (CP) for two of seven residents (Resident 10 and 6) with limited range of motion ([ROM] full movement potential of a joint) and mobility (ability to move) by failing to: 1. Revise and update Resident 10's CP for Physical Therapy ([PT] profession aimed in the restoration, maintenance, and promotion of optimal physical function) and Restorative Nursing Aide ([RNA] nursing aide program that helps residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) services for ambulation (the act of walking). 2. Revise and update Resident 6's CP to specify the RNA program and discontinuation of PT services. These failures had the potential to result in inaccurate provision of services for ROM and mobility to Resident 6 and resulted in the absence of intervention for Resident 10's ability to walk. Cross reference F688. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 10's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two of 53 nursing staff (Director of Nursing [DON] and Certified Nurse Assistant [CNA] 10) Basic Life Support (BLS, the level of care provided to victims of life-threatening illness or injuries until medical care is available, including recognition of cardiac arrest and activation of the emergency response system), that included cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, an emergency procedure combing chest compressions and rescue breaths to circulate blood and oxygen when the heart stops or breathing ceases) licenses were not expired. This deficient practice had the potential to place the residents, who were identified as full code, at risk for not receiving adequate and proper life-saving measures during a code blue (a life-threatening medical emergency requiring an immediate trained response for CPR), potentially leading to greater harm and/or death to other residents residing in the facility.Findings: During a concurrent interview and record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pressure relieving devices to one of seven sampled residents (Resident 18) reviewed for limited range of motion ([ROM] full movement potential of a joint) and mobility (ability to move) who was assessed as high risk for the developing pressure injury (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence). This failure had the potential for Resident 18 to develop pressure injuries, which could lead to pain and discomfort. Findings: During a review of Resident 18's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 18 on 3/13/2025 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, dementia, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and contractures (stiffening/shortening at any joint that reduces the joint's range of motion) of both knees and the right hand. During a review of Resident 18's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a federally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of three sampled residents (Resident 3) received oxygen (the most critical gas for human survival) therapy with the oxygen nasal cannula (NC, a thin and hollow plastic tube that is placed under an individual's nostril to deliver oxygen) placed in the nostril and not over the resident's left cheek. This deficient practice placed Resident 3, who had diagnoses that affect the respiratory system (the body's way of bringing in oxygen), at risk of experiencing complications associated with the lack of oxygen. During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated that the resident was originally admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included respiratory failure (condition where the lungs cannot adequately supply oxygen to the blood), pneumonitis (inflammation of the lung tissue, causing breathing difficulties, dry cough, and fatigue), and asthma (a condition in which the airways narrow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) for the administration of medications for two out of four sampled residents (Resident 38 and Resident 1) when: 1.Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 did not verify the frequency of Resident 38's medication order for Tylenol (or Acetaminophen, a medication used to manage pain) prior to its administration. 2. LVN 3 did not follow Resident 1's physician order for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (a medication used to manage pain). These deficient practices had the potential for the facility's staffs to increase a risk for medication errors, including missed doses, delayed administration, or over-administration. These deficient practices had a potential to result in Resident 38 and Resident 1's experience of inadequate pain control or adverse medication effects. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 38's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated that the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of the medications and biologicals when: 1.Two out of two sampled Medication Carts (MC) contained expired medications- Ibuprofen (a medication used to control pain) and Hyoscyamine Sulfate (or brand name Levsin, a medication used to treat symptoms of gastrointestinal diseases [sicknesses that affect the digestive system]). 2. One of ten sampled residents (Resident 65) who was admitted to the facility with two bags containing a total of 19 medications that was kept at bedside. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for receiving expired medications, which placed the residents at risk for reduced therapeutic effect (meaning the medication may not work as intended to treat the resident's condition). This deficient practice increased the risk of inadequate symptom management, unwanted effects, and potential harm to the residents. This deficient practice resulted in a medication bottle left at the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in a form designed to meet individual needs by failing to: 1.Provide a palatable (describes food that is pleasant to taste, or an idea that is acceptable, satisfactory, or agreeable to the mind) and appetizing therapeutic diet for Resident 58 in accordance with the facility Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Food: Quality and Palatability 2. Provide the correct pureed (foods blended to a smooth, pudding-like consistency, free of lumps, seeds, or skins to aid those with severe chewing or swallowing difficulties) texture for Resident 24 in accordance with the facility's P&P titled, Diet and Nutrition Care Manual These deficient practices had the potential to result in Resident 58 and Resident 24 not finding their foods palatable and placed Resident 58 and Resident 24 at risk for potential choking, aspiration (occurs when food, liquid, saliva, or vomit enters the airway and lungs instead of the esophagus, often causing coughing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the therapeutic diet (physician order diet) was served as prescribed by the physician for one of four sample residents (Resident 58). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 58 not wanting to eat their food and had the potential to result in their nutritional requirements not being met, which may lead to dehydration, weight loss, and decreased quality of life. Cross Reference F805Findings: During a review of Resident 58's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 58 on 9/3/2024 and readmitted Resident 58 on 6/9/2025 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (stroke, blockage of blood flow to the brain) affecting the left non-dominant side, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), and unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide one of 16 sampled residents (Resident 6) with Speech Language and Pathology ([SLP] profession aimed in the prevention, assessment, and treatment of speech, language, communicative, and swallowing disorders) Evaluation or Screening in accordance with the physician's orders, dated 12/30/2025 and 1/12/2026. These failures resulted in Resident 6 receiving a puree diet (food altered into a smooth and creamy texture for people with difficulty chewing or swallowing) and did not receive intervention to improve Resident 6's speech. Findings: During a review of Resident 6's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 6 on 11/6/2025 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (brain damage due to a loss of oxygen to the area) affecting the left non-dominant side. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure (Resident 1) who received psychotropic (medications to manage mood, behavior, or perception) was free of unnecessary chemical restraints. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 1 receiving unnecessary medication and can lead to adverse medication reactions. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), difficulty in walking, Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL - is a type of blood cancer that develops in the lymphatic system). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/8/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 was admitted from the General Acute Care Hospital (GAHC) with diagnosis of recurrent falls. During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 11/15/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 does not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accidents and supervision, was free of accident hazards as possible by failing to identify the potential risk factors that led to resident falling on 12/28/2025, 1/7/2026, 1/12/2026, and 1/21/2026. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure the Care Plan was revised after Resident 1 sustained a fall on 12/28/2025. As a result, Resident 1 fell again on 1/7/2026 and sustained an open cut to the bridge of the nose with bruising.These deficient practices resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a left hip fracture on 1/21/2026 [fourth fall] after falling from standing position and was transferred to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) on 1/21/2026. On 1/23/2026, Resident 1 underwent surgery for a left hip hemi-arthroplasty (a surgical procedure that involves replacing half of the hip joint) and diminished in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) that included a decline from walking 10 feet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0555 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was allowed to exercise the right to choose a physician for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for residents' rights. The facility did not work with Resident 1 to select another physician of the resident's preference when the current attending physician (Physician 1) was unable to provide the necessary care and services before transferring care to an alternate physician (Physician 2). This deficient practice had the potential to prevent Resident 1's preferences from being honored. During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 12/20/2025, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease-irreversible kidney failure) with hemodialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administered medication Lyrica (a medication that treats nerve pain) as ordered for neuropathy (disease or dysfunction of one or more nerves, typically causing numbness, tingling, burning pain in the hands and feet) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) as ordered by the attending physician. This deficient practice resulted in the resident missing the medication as scheduled and could result in increased discomfort. During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 12/20/2025, the AR indicated Resident 1was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease-irreversible kidney failure) with hemodialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed). During a record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) within 2 hours to the ombudsman, local police department, and to California Department of Public Health (CDPH) in accordance with the facility's Policy and Procedure titled, Abuse and Neglect Prohibition Policy. On 12/21/25 between 5 PM and 6 PM, a commotion was heard by certified nurse assistant (CNA) 1 and when CNA1 arrived at Resident 1 and Resident 2's room [room [ROOM NUMBER]], Resident 1 was observed with a slipper in her hand, and Resident 2, reported to CNA 1 that Resident 1 threatened to hit Resident 2 with the slipper. This deficient practice resulted in the facility underreporting allegations of abuse and had the potential for the facility not to follow abuse protocols. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 1/16/2025 with diagnoses that included paranoid schizophrenia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a resident specific care plan that reflected Resident 1's change in condition of a skin tear to the left shin.This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 to not receive appropriate care, treatment, and/or services.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated an admission to the facility on 9/18/2024 with diagnoses that included cellulitis of right lower limb, chronic respiratory failure, and lack of coordination. During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical Assessment (H&P), dated 11/3/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 1's SBAR (Situation Background Assessment Recommendation) Communication Form and progress note dated 10/24/2025, timed at 10:11 AM, the SBAR indicated during resident care, Resident 1 was transferring from the shower chair to the wheelchair with assistance and hit her log on the foot pedal which caused a skin tear to the left shin. The note indicated pressure and steri strips…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was individualized for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who was diagnosed with cancer and prescribed belzutifan (medication to treat cancer) 120 milligrams twice a day, indicated specific side effects (an effect of a drug or other type of treatment that is in addition to or beyond its desired effect) and specific monitoring required when taking belzutifan. As a result of this deficient practice, Resident 1 was inadequately monitored and was at risk for potential adverse effects (unintended, undesirable, and potentially harmful reactions to a therapy, such as medication, that range from mild to severe and can sometimes be linked to the treatment's primary action or an individual's unique response) or toxicities associated with taking Belzutifan. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the resident was originally admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 1) who had a diagnosis of cancer (a disease characterized by the uncontrolled growth and division of abnormal cells). Specifically, the facility failed to coordinate services related to the care and medication management of Resident 1's cancer, including monitoring for adverse effects and toxicity associated with the administration of Belzutifan (a cancer treatment medication, known to carry risks of anemia [a condition in which the blood lacks sufficient healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to the body's organs and tissues, leading to symptoms such as fatigue, weakness, and shortness of breath]) and hypoxemia (an abnormal condition characterized by insufficient oxygen supply to the body's tissues). The facility failed to ensure that Resident 1's care was coordinated in accordance with the treatment plans established by Oncologist 1, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of three sampled Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN 2) and two out of three sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA 3) had adequate competency and skill sets by ensuring the staffs completed the annual competency assessment and evaluation (a process that assess and evaluates an employees skills, knowledge and performance) for the appropriate job category when providing quality care. As a result of this deficient practice the residents had the potential not to receive quality of care under the standard of practice which could lead to a decline in the resident's wellbeing. Findings: During a review of LVN ' s 2 employee file records indicated the facility hired LVN 2 on 6/1/2012. LVN 2 ' s employee records included a Licensed Nurse Master competency Evaluation Worksheet undated. The section titled validators assessment was left blank indicating LVN 2 was not evaluated for skills and competency. During a review of CNA ' s 2 employee file records indicated the facility hired CNA 2/2/2021. CNA ' s 3 employee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the food were stored prepared and distributed of food under sanitary conditions and served food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and the facility's policy and procedure for 47 of 47 residents in the facility by failing to: 1. Document in the Sanitization Bucket Log the concentration of Quaternary Ammonia solution( a solution used to kill germs and bacteria) parts per million (PPM) that indicates the solution concentration effectively eliminate disease causing organisms. 2. Document in the Dish Machine Cleaning Log the temperature of the water during dish washing, during rinse and sanitation concentration. 3. Ensure the kitchen trashcan remained closed as required to prevent contamination and maintained sanitary food preparation environment. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for foodborne illnesses (refers to illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages) and increased the risk of pest infestation and cross-contamination affecting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced a resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of her individuality for one out of the 13 sampled residents (Resident 27) who was observed being assisted by a facility staff who standing over and not at the eye level of the resident while assisting her during a meal. This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 27's self-esteem, self-worth, and the resident's sense of independence Findings: During a review of Resident 27's admission Record (Face Sheet), the facility admitted Resident 27 on 10/5/2018, and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM: long-term metabolic disorder that is characterized by high blood sugar, insulin resistance, and relative lack of insulin) and hypertension (a long-term medical condition in which the blood pressure in the arteries is persistently elevated). During a review of Resident 27's History and Physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 12) by ensuring the resident's call lights (a device used to alert staff to the resident ' s room) were placed within the resident reach in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure [P&P] titled Answering Call lights. This deficient practice had the potential for the residents not to receive care and services that could result in accidents and falls. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and then readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson ' s Disease without Dyskinesia (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy). During a review of Resident 1's History and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform and provide written information for one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 4) regarding their right to be informed and signed a written consent about the medication's use and side effects (undesired effect) before receiving Invega Sustenna (medication to treat schizophrenia [disorder that affects a person ' s ability to think, feel, and behave clearly]) that was not dispensed from facility ' s pharmacy. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 4's violation of residents right and received Invega Sustenna and experience side effects that could lead to a decline in the resident ' s well being. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record indicated an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often tremors), encephalopathy (a change in how your brain functions), and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 4's History and Physical assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-16 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the Notification of bed-hold and Return form (a form that indicates the resident's rights to return to the facility after hospitalization) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 29) who was transferred to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures. This deficient practice resulted in the violation of the resident's rights to be informed about the Notification of bed-hold and Return policy and to be aware that the resident can return to the facility after hospitalization as ordered by the physician. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 29 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the facility admitted Resident 29 on 1/9/2025, and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses diabetes mellitus (DM: long-term metabolic disorder that is characterized by high blood sugar, insulin resistance, and relative lack of insulin) and hypertension (a long-term medical condition in which the blood pressure in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a resident specific care plan that included interventions to monitor for the side effects such as bruising and bleeding for the use of Apixaban ( a medication that thins blood or an anticoagulant medication) used to treat and prevent blood clots) for DVT (deep vein thrombosis - a blood clot that blocks the flow of blood in the veins) for one of one sampled residents (Resident 35) prophylaxis (prevention). This deficient practice had the potential for the staff not to be able to provide care needed by the resident who was at risk for bleeding to develop bleeding in the body that could lead to excessive bleeding and blood loss resulting to death. Findings: During a review of Resident 35's admission Record indicated a readmission to the facility on 2/9/2025 with diagnoses that included encounter for palliative care (specialized medical care that focuses on providing relief from pain and other symptoms of a serious illness), peripheral vascular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent unnecessary use of medication by ensuring one of one sampled resident (Resident 25) was monitored for bruising and bleeding while receiving Apixaban (a medication used to thin the blood and to treat or prevent deep venous thrombosis [DVT, a condition in which harmful blood clots form in the blood vessels of the legs]). This deficient practice increased the risk of Resident 35 to experience adverse effects (unwanted and dangerous side effects of medication) that could lead to health complications, such as excessive bleeding in the intestines and stomach or other parts of the body, bruising that could lead to death. Findings: During a review of Resident 35 ' s admission Record indicated a readmission to the facility on 2/9/2025 with diagnoses that included encounter for palliative care (specialized medical care that focuses on providing relief from pain and other symptoms of a serious illness), peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate dosage and length of therapy by failing to ensure: 1. Resident 4's medications were labeled correctly. Resident 4 was ordered by the physician o receive Depakote (also known as Divalproex Sodium medication to treat seizures and bipolar disorder [mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings]) ER (Extended Release, medications designed to make them last longer in the body). The bubble pack (a card that packages doses of medication within small, clear, or light-resistant amber-colored plastic) was labeled Divalproex Sodium DR (delayed release-a type of medication designed to release active ingredients slower rate in the gastrointestinal tract). 2. The Curad triple antibiotic ointment (ointment used to treat infection) and antibiotic Stomahesive protective powder (powder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility's policy and procedure on infection control for three of 3 residents (Residents 13, 27 and 36) by failing to ensure: 1. Activity Assistant 1 (AS) and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 4, performed hand hygiene while distributing resident meal trays to Resdent 13 and Resident 27. 2. Resident 36's nebulizer mask (mask used to deliver the liquid medication) was properly store when not in use to prevent contamination. These deficient practices had the potential to transmit infectious microorganisms and increase the risk of infection for the residents. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 13's admission Record (Face Sheet), the facility admitted Resident 13 on 10/8/2017 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM: long-term metabolic disorder that is characterized by high blood sugar, insulin resistance, and relative lack of insulin) and hypertension (a long-term medical condition in which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure seven (7) of 7 sampled residents (Residents 7, 19, 21, 34, 37, 49, and 16) had a completed Advanced Directive (AD, a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated)acknowledgment form. This deficient practice had the potential to result in misinformation of medical care and treatment and not honoring resident's wishes in cases where the resident and/or responsible party was unable to participate in making healthcare decisions. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 16's admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident 16 on 1/30/2024 with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - type of obstructive lung disease characterized by long-term poor airflow). During a review of Resident 16's History and Physical (H&P), dated 12/18/2023, indicated, Resident 16 did not have has the capacity to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-17 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the Bed Hold (holding the resident ' s bed while in the hospital or out for therapeutic leave) Notification form and inform the residents and/or their responsible party/ representative for three of three sampled residents (Resident 7, Resident 34 and Resident 16) regarding the Bed Hold in accordance with the facility ' s policy and procedures and federal and state regulations guidelines. This deficient practice had the potential for the resident not to be informed of their rights that they are able to return to the facility after hospitalization or therapeutic leave at a specified duration of time. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 16 ' s admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident 16 on 1/30/2024 with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - type of obstructive lung disease characterized by long-term poor airflow). During a review of Resident 16's History and Physical (H&P), dated 12/18/2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. A review of Resident 42 ' s Face Sheet indicated the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm (cancerous tumor) of unspecified part of bronchus (a large airway) or lung, malignant neoplasm (cancerous tumor-an abnormal cell growth) of the brain. A review of Resident 42 ' s History and Physical dated 1/26/2024 indicated Resident 42 does not have to the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 42 ' s Order summary report with active orders, dated 2/29/2024, indicated an order for enteral (into the stomach or intestine) feed order every shift check G-tube (gastrointestinal tube-surgically placed device used to give direct access to the stomach for supplemental feeding, hydration or medicine) patency with an order start date 1/26/2026. A review of Resident 42's care plan developed on 1/26/2024, indicated no interventions related to the management and monitoring of Resident 42 with GT. A review of the care plan revised on 3/16/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and preparation practices in the kitchen and label food in the kitchen, in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures on Food Storage: Dry Goods and Food Storage: Cold Foods. 1. A can of unopened Bread Crumbs with no label of date received was found in the Dry Storage Pantry. 2. Twenty one (21) packages of frozen hashbrowns with no label of date received was found in Freezer 4. These deficient practices had the potential to put residents at risk for foodborne illnesses (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins). Findings: During the initial observation of the kitchen on 3/15/2024 at 10:41 AM, a can of breadcrumbs was observed with no label date of when received in dry storage are. The Dietary Supervisor (DS) stated it was important to label with date received, use by and open date. The DS stated this was, so the kitchen staff knows first in first out, and to know when the food expires. During the initial observation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to check prior employers for three of five randomly selected employees Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 2, and Registered Nurse 1 (RN1) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure, titled Abuse and Neglect Prohibition to prevent and protect residents from abuse. This deficient practice had the potential for the facility to hire employees with history of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents which put residents at risk for abuse and lead to possible physical and emotional harm residents. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) and review of the employee file of CNA 1 on 3/16/2024 at 11:32 am, the DSD stated CNA 1 was hired on 2/10/2024. The DSD stated there was no documented evidence that CNA 1 ' s previous employment was checked prior to hiring CNA 1. The DSD stated the previous employer of the employee must be verified prior to hiring to know if employee have abuse records in their previous employment. During a concurrent interview and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-17 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Notice of Transfer and Discharge was provided to the resident's responsible party in accordance with the facility's policy titled Transfer and Discharge. for one of one resident (Resident 16) who was transferred to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 16's rights ensure for an appropriate discharge/transfer from the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 16 ' s admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident 16 on 1/30/2024 with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - type of obstructive lung disease characterized by long-term poor airflow to the lungs). A review of Resident 16's History and Physical (H&P), dated 12/18/2023, indicated, Resident 16 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 16's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 2/13/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 16 required moderate assistance with eating, oral hygiene, shower,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment and care planning tool) dated 2/16/2024 assessment reflected an accurate assessment of the discharge destination for one of three sampled resident (Resident 55). Resident 55, who was discharged home was coded in the MDS assessment as being discharged to a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH). This deficient practice resulted in an inaccurate reporting to the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid (CMS, a federal agency that administers the Medicare program and works with state governments to administer the Medicaid and health insurance portability standards) agency and had the potential to result in Resident 55 not to receive interventions to address specific care concerns upon discharged to home. Findings: A review of Resident 55 ' s admission Record indicated Resident 55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing) and hyperlipidemia (high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 16's nasal cannula tubing (flexible plastic tubing used to deliver oxygen through nostrils and the tubing is fitted over the patient ' s ears) was labeled with date as indicated in the facility ' s Policy and Procedure titled Oxygen Humidifiers. This deficient practice placed the Resident 16 at risk for infection. Findings: A review of Resident 16 ' s admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident 16 on 1/30/2024 with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - type of obstructive lung disease characterized by long-term poor airflow) A review of Resident 16 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 2/13/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 16 required moderate assistance with eating, oral hygiene, shower, body dressing, and personal hygiene. A review of Resident 16's Order Summary Report, dated 3/15/2024, indicated to administer oxygen at two (2) liters per minute (L/min) via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents (Resident 33 and 42) were appropriately assessed and completed the facility's Surveillance Data Collection Form to screen the residents for the adequate use of antibiotics (medications to treat infection). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the development of antibiotic-resistant organisms (organisms resistant [or not effectively treated] with antibiotics) and lead to unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use. Findings: 1.A review of Resident 33 ' s Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar), cellulitis (a bacterial skin infection) of left toe. A review of Resident 33 ' s History and Physical dated 2/23/2024 indicated Resident 33 has fluctuating capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 33's order summary report,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-16 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet (sq. ft. unit of measurement) per resident care area for eight (8) out of twenty-eight (28) resident rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 33). The 8 resident rooms consisted of seven (7) - two (2) bed capacity rooms and one (1) four (4) bed capacity room. This deficient practice had the potential to impact the ability to provide safe nursing care and privacy to the residents. Findings: During an interview with the Administrator (ADM) on 3/14/2025 at 7 PM, the ADM stated the facility would like to request a room waiver for 8 resident rooms this year. The ADM stated nothing was changed and the number of bed occupancy in rooms 1,2,4,5,7,8,9, and 33 remained the same. A review of the facility ' s request for additional room waiver dated 3/15/2024 indicated the granting of the variance will not compromise the health, welfare, and safety of the residents. The request indicated the following resident bedrooms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-17 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet (sq. ft. unit of measurement) per resident for eight (8) out of twenty-eight (28) resident rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 33). The 8 resident rooms consisted of seven (7) - two (2) bed capacity rooms and one (1)- four (4) bed capacity room. This deficient practice had the potential to impact the ability to provide safe nursing care and privacy to the residents. Findings: During an interview with the Administrator (ADM) on 3/15/2024 at 10:30 AM, the ADM stated the facility would like to request a room waiver for 8 resident rooms this year. The ADM stated nothing was changed and the number of bed occupancy in rooms 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 33 remained the same. A review of the facility ' s request for additional room waiver dated 3/15/2024 indicated the granting of the variance will not compromise the health, welfare, and safety of the residents. The request indicated the following resident bedrooms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MAYER 2012 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2012
KARP, BENJAMINIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/30/2023
KARP, MATTHEWIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2026
FIGUEROA, JOANNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/18/2019
LIU, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
5101 TYLER AVENUE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/23/2011
BASTOMSKI LIVING TRUST DATED APRIL 18, 1997OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/23/2011
CARAVAN OPERATIONS CORPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/20/2012
MAYER 2005 REVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/23/2011
MAYER, HELENEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/23/2011
MAYER, RONALDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/23/2011

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-12.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$356K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 16%Other / private 84%

This home reported $356K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$409per resident / day
operating cost
$12,419per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$363per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056413. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next