No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Thousand Oaks Post Acute, LLC

93 West Avenida De Los Arboles, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 123 certified beds · (805) 492-2444 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (805) 492-2444 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0604) — cited Nov 20211 actual-harm citation$20,703 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $20,703 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-17)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
475-B E. Avenida De Los Arboles
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.6 mi
387 E Avenida De Los Arboles · (805) 492-1559 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
451 E Avenida de los Arboles · (805) 492-7107 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Wildwood Canyon Paradise Falls Trail · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1 W Avenida de los Arboles · (805) 492-1234

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.1%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.3%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.1%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.4%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.8%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.0%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.5%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control2.8%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.2%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.3%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.0%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.3%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.612.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.231.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 366 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
57.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.63U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.30hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.26hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 57.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 162 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.63 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 44% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.5%CMS range 37.1–47.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 8.5–13.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge57.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified66.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.7%CMS range 7.8–14.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.121.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.53
RN hours/ resident / day
1.04
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.53
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.10
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.40
RN hoursweekends
39.6%
Total nursing turnover
41.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 101.2 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.26 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-25)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2021-11-18)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-12-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (Resident 1) was provided quality care when the facility failed to: Administer Glargine (insulin used for regulating blood sugar) for 3 days, on 8/21 at 9 p.m., 8/22 at 9 a.m. and 9 p.m., and 8/23 at 9 a.m. 2. Notify/Communicate to the charge nurse and physician the missed doses of Glargine. 3. Acquire insulin to meet Resident 1's needs. 4. Administer Glargine from a properly labeled medication container. 5. Clarify the order for finger stick blood sugar (FSBS- a method of monitoring blood sugar levels) with the physician. 6. Failed to monitor blood glucose (BG- blood sugar). 7. Realize the need for monitoring blood sugar. As a result of these failures, Resident 1 was transferred to an acute care hospital due to abnormally high blood sugar (593) for evaluation and treatment and ultimately died. FindingsDuring a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was 65-years-old admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), was cared for by staff (IP and CNA2) using enhanced barrier precautions (gloves and gown). This failure had the potential to result in the spread of harmful germs from contaminated uniforms to residents during the delivery of care.During a review of Resident 1's physician orders dated 3/5/26, the orders indicated Resident 1 to have Enhance Barrier Precautions due to: foot and right buttocks wounds every shit for infection control and prevention. During a review of the facilities P&P titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated January 2025, the P&P indicated, EBP are indicated for residents with any of the following: Wounds, even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized with a Multi-Drug-Resistant Organism (MDRO). The staff will implement EBP for residents who are indicated when performing the following high contact resident care activities: providing hygiene.changing briefs . Review of the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) All…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1): 1. Had a baseline care plan (BCP- initial instructions for care right after admission) developed for diabetes management. 2. Had BCP developed for abdominal binder (a wide, elastic compression belt worn around the abdomen) use. 3. Had BCP interventions (specific actions to be taken) that were applicable to Resident 1 regarding NPO (nothing by mouth) status. These failures resulted in Resident 1 being transferred to the hospital for elevated blood sugar and had the potential for choking or aspiration (food or liquids entering the lungs).During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was a [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of cerebral infarction (stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) and secondary diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control), dysphagia (difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (Resident 1) was provided care according to accepted professional nursing standards (actions that ensure safe nursing practice) when the facility failed to: Develop a baseline care plan (BCP- initial instructions for care right after admission developed by using the nursing process) for diabetes management. 2. Develop care plans (CP- a detailed outline of health needs, goals, and preferences that guides care to ensure consistent and appropriate care) with resident specific interventions. 3. Clarify conflicting orders for the way to (route) administer medication. 4. Follow physician order for monitoring blood pressure (BP). 5. To communicate with the physician to clarify PRN (as needed) Seroquel order when ordered for an excessive duration without an end date and with conflicting physician indications for its use. 6. To include an intervention for a psychiatric assessment and a review of the results of the psychiatric…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1):1. Had appropriate alternatives to bed rails identified and tried.2. Was adequately assessed for bed rail use. 3. Had their bed and mattress assessed for bed rails (metal bars attached to the bed) prior to the bed rail installation. 4. Had the appropriately trained staff install the bedrails.These failures had the potential to result in an increased risk of entrapment (caught, trapped, entangled, or strangled in the space in or about the bed rail).Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of cerebral infarction (type of stroke- brain cells die) and secondary diagnoses including flaccid (floppy and weak) hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), muscle weakness, drug-induced polyneuropathy (nerve damage that occurs as a side effect of certain medications), dysphagia (swallowing difficulties) with gastrostomy (surgical opening in the abdomen to insert a feeding tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have competent nurses who possessed the knowledge, skills, and judgment required to provide safe care for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), when the facility failed to ensure: Licensed nurses knew to contact the physician when they did not administer Glargine (insulin- medicine used to regulate blood glucose levels) as ordered. 2. Licensed nurses knew to communicate to the charge nurse the missed doses of Glargine. 3. Licensed nurses knew to contact the physician when the medication administration record did not include blood glucose monitoring. 4. Licensed nurses knew to clarify conflicting orders for how to (route) administer medication. For Resident 1, these facility failures resulted in unsafe nursing care and admission to the hospital for an avoidable decline.1. According to Fundamentals of Nursing ([NAME] et al; Elsevier: 2023, p. 640), Administering medications requires unique nursing knowledge, clinical judgement, and skills.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) had complete and accurate documentation in their health record.This failure resulted in the planning and delivery of care based on inaccurate resident assessments.According to Fundamentals of Nursing ([NAME] et al; Elsevier: 2023, p. 389), Information in a patient's record provides a detailed account of the level of quality of care delivered. The quality of care, the standards of regulatory agencies and nursing practice, the reimbursement structure in the health care system, and legal guidelines make documentation and reporting an extremely important nursing responsibility. During an interview on 9/25/25 at 3:45 p.m. with a licensed nurse (LN1), LN1 stated LN1 texted the physician to clarify Resident 1's route of medication administration. LN1 stated there is no record of this text in Resident 1's medical record. During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/25/25 at 3:45 p.m. with LN1, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), had an accurate diagnosis recorded on their Minimum Data Set Assessment ([MDS] a tool for implementing standardized assessment and for planning care). This facility failure resulted in the facility reporting inaccurate data to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/28/25 at 3:34 p.m. with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC), Resident 1's MDS 3.0 Section I - Active Diagnoses was reviewed. The section indicated, an active diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia ([BPH], condition in older men where the prostate gland enlarges but is not cancerous). MDSC stated that MDS Section I - Active Diagnoses for BPH should not have been marked yes and acknowledged that MDS Section I was incorrectly coded, as Resident 1 did not have this diagnosis. During a review of the facility 's MDS manual titled, CMS's RAI Version 3.0 Manual, dated 10/2024, the MDS manual indicated, Active Diagnoses Intent: The items in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0777 — isolated
    Provide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promptly notify the physician of the x-ray results for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in a delay in treatment for Resident 1's dislocated hip and increased the potential for Resident 1 to experience unnecessary pain or worsening of her condition. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 5/28/25, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted in the facility on 2/24/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to, midcervical fracture of right femur (a break in the upper bone near the hip) and aftercare following joint replacement surgery. During a review of Resident 1's Radiology Results Report (RRR), dated 5/19/2025 at 7:13 p.m., the RRR indicated, postsurgical changes from a right hip hemiarthroplasty with superior dislocations (the femoral component of the hip implant had moved upward out of place). During a review of Resident 1's Change of Condition (COC), dated 5/20/25 at 7:41 p.m., the COC indicated, Resident 1 was sent out to [hospital name] via…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #103 on 01/25/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had diagnoses that included other speech and language deficits following cerebral infarction, dysphagia, aphasia, apraxia, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, seizures, and systolic heart failure. Resident #103's discharge MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/04/2025, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS also indicated the resident discharged to a short-term general hospital setting. Resident #103's Order Summary Report, revealed an order dated 02/04/2025, for the resident to discharge to home with home health on 02/04/2025. Resident #103's nursing Progress Notes, dated 02/04/2025 at 3:50 PM, revealed Resident #103 discharged to home with arrangements for home health. During an interview on 04/25/2025 at 9:28 AM, MDS Coordinator #3 stated that MDS accuracy was important because it drove the plan of care for residents. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to resubmit a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) as required for 1 (Resident #64) of 3 residents reviewed for PASRR. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), revised 01/2025, revealed the section titled GUIDELINES, included, 4. A negative Level I screen permits admission to proceed and ends the pre-screening process unless possible serious mental disorder or intellectual disability arises later. Further review revealed, 16. If the State program permits the use of the exceptions and the resident remains in the facility longer that 30 days, the facility must screen the individual using the State's Level I screening process and refer any resident who has or may have MD [mental disease], ID [intellectual disability] or a related condition to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASARR [PASRR] evaluation and determination. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #62 on 11/28/2023.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three resident's (Resident 1) right to be treated with dignity when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) removed bra while in Resident 1's room. This facility failure had the potential to result in a loss of dignity for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 4/2/2025, the admission Record indicated in part, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: muscle weakness, aphasia (language disorder that results from brain damage), type 2 diabetes mellitus (the body cannot use insulin [a hormone which regulates the amount of glucose in the blood] correctly and sugar builds up in the blood), cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), (a standardized assessment tool to evaluate the health and functional abilities of residents) dated 2/28/2025, the MDS indicated, a Brief Interview for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) was treated with respect and dignity when the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 repeatedly told Resident 1 to wait for a brief change. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 1's sense of self-worth, self-esteem, and overall quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 11/27/24, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses including encephalopathy (disturbance of brain function), Arthritis (swelling and tenderness of one or more joints), and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1's, MDS (Minimum Data Sheet - a federally mandated process of clinical assessment for nursing home patients) Assessment, dated 11/22/24, the MDS indicated, Section C - Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) assessment indicated, Resident 1 had a BIMS Score of 10 (The BIMS assessment uses a points system that ranges from 0 to 15 points: 0 to 7 points suggests severe cognitive impairment, 8 to 12 points…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) who had a colostomy (an opening that connects the digestive tract to the surface of the belly to allow for waste material and gas to leave the body) received care consistent with professional standards of practice when Resident 1's colostomy bag was removed, emptied, and placed back on by unlicensed staff. This failure had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for complications such as infections or dislodgment of the colostomy bag. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 7/12/24, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses including, colostomy, artificial opening of urinary tract, hypertension (high blood pressure) and hyperlipidemia (build-up of fats in the blood). During a review of Resident 1's, MDS (Minimum Data Sheet - a federally mandated process of clinical assessment for nursing home patients) Assessment, dated 7/16/24 , the MDS indicated, Section C - Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) assessment indicated, Resident 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform hand washing while providing colostomy (an opening that connects the digestive tract to the surface of the belly to allow for waste material and gas to leave the body) care with one of three sampled resident (Resident 3). This failure had the potential to cause infection to Resident 3's colostomy site. Findings: During an observation of Resident 3's colostomy care treatment on 8/9/24 at 12:45 p.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN 1), LN 1 with a new pair of gloves, removed the soiled colostomy bag, placed them in a garbage receptable. LN 1 removed the pair of dirty gloves, placed them in a garbage receptacle, and then put on clean gloves without washing her hands. LN 1 then proceeded to clean the stoma (any opening in the body) removed dirty gloves, grabbed a new pair of gloves, and again placing a new pair on without performing handwashing. During an interview on 8/9/24 at 12:50 p.m. with LN 1, LN 1 acknowledged not washing her hands during the treatment. LN 1 further stated that washing hands in between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) had timely access to their medical records. This failure resulted in Resident 1's legal representative delayed access to their health history and violated the resident's right to medical record access. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Resident Access to PHI or Financial Records, dated 9/1/23, the P&P indicated, If the resident and/or their personal representative requests a copy of the resident's medical or financial record, the HIPAA Privacy Officer will provide the resident and/or their personal representative with a copy of the medical record within two (2) working days after receiving the written request. During an interview on 10/12/23 at 1:20 p.m., with admission (AD), the AD stated on 10/2/23 the facility received an eFax (online fax) request for medical records from Resident 1's legal representative. AD verbalized on the same day, 10/02/23, in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0836 — isolated
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered pain medication per facility policy and procedure (P&P) for one of three residents (Resident 1). Resident 1 received pain medication for a pain level of 5/10 (pain scale 0-10 - 0 being no pain, 10 being the worst pain) when the order indicated the medication was to be given for a pain level of 7-10/10. This facility failure had the potential for Resident 1 to sustain adverse reactions. Findings: During a Review of Resident 1's, Order Summary Report, an order dated 6/1/23 indicated, Hydromorphone HCL (a Narcotic used to treat moderate to severe pain) Oral Tablet 4 MG (milligrams) give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for severe pain 7-10/10. During a review of Resident 1's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated June 2023, the MAR indicated, Hydromorphone HCI oral Tablet 4 MG, was administered to Resident 1, on 6/3/23 at 0:901 a.m. and 6/3/23 at 1:07 p.m. for a pain level of 5/10, not a pain level of 7-10/10 as per physician order. During a review of the facility ' s P&P titled,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-11-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its policies and procedures (P&P) on dry food storage and kitchen sanitation, and ensure food quality and safety standards were met when: 1) stored food products found in the dry food storage room [ROOM NUMBER] were beyond the indicated use by date labels, and 2) the temperature of the sanitizing solution used to cleanse/sanitize non-food contact work surfaces and kitchen equipment was not measured. These failures had the potential to contaminate foods served to the residents, that can lead to serious food-borne illness. Findings: 1) During a review of the facility's P&P, titled, Food and Nutrition Services - General, dated 9/1/21, the P&P indicated, in part, The primary objectives of the dietary department include .c) Maintenance of standards for sanitation and safety, d) Maintenance of standards for quality of food During a concurrent inspection, and interview, with the Dietary Manager (DM), on 11/15/21 at 9:45 A.M., of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment when residents shared closets/cabinets in rooms (18, 19, 20, and 36) for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 54), and eight unsampled residents (Resident 58, 12, 28, 80, 302, 41, 7, and 83). This failure resulted in the residents not having a personalized, homelike atmosphere and could affect their psychological well-being Findings: During an observation on 11/15/21, at 3:15 p.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 54's personal cabinet/closet space was observed next to the bed. Further observation revealed Residents 12, 54, and 58 all shared the same closet space for their personal belongings. During an interview on 11/15/21, at 3:35 p.m., with Licensed Nurse (LN 1), LN 1 confirmed all residents should have their own private closet space. LN 1 further stated, If one resident can have their own cabinet, I don't see why the other residents cannot . During another observation on 11/16/21, at 10:20 a.m., rooms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards in clinical practice and documentation were met, when: 1) staff administered pain medication to two of 20 sampled residents (Resident 20 and Resident 97), that did not meet the medication order parameter for its indication, and 2) staff follow-up assessment and education were not done, after resident refusal of apical pulse measurement, for two of 20 sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 8). These failures had the potential to inappropriately identify and manage resident health issues that may lead to serious harm. Findings: 1a) During a review of Resident 20's, admission Record (AR), dated 8/15/20, the record indicated Resident 20 was admitted with diagnoses including, Cervical Disc Disorder at C5-C6 Level with Radiculopathy (injury to the spinal cord that causes weakness); Other Chronic Pain, Adult Osteochondrosis of Spine, Lumbar Region (discs in the spine pressed together causing pain), and Other muscle spasm. During a review of Resident 20's, Order Summary Report (OSR), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an appropriate call light for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 54). This failure has the potential for the resident to not receive necessary care and could result in complications and poor psychosocial outcome. Findings: During an observation on 11/15/21, at 3:00 p.m., in the resident's room, Resident 54 was observed in bed. Both hands of the resident were contracted, with a regular call light clipped on the bedsheet. Further observation revealed Resident 54 does not have the capacity to hold or use the call light. During an interview on 11/15/21, at 3:30 p.m., with Licensed Nurse (LN 1), LN 1 confirmed the call light was inappropriate for Resident 54. LN 1 further stated, The resident cannot even hold the light. It should be a different one. During a review of Resident 54's admission Record (AR), dated 6/22/21, the AR indicated, Resident 54 had contracture of the muscle of both the right and left hands. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Resident Rights -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 82) was free of physical restraints. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the resident's physical mobility and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During an observation of Resident 82's room on 11/15/21, at 2:27 p.m., Resident 82 was observed in bed, the left side of the bed was placed against the wall and on the right side of the bed two side rails were raised. During an interview on 11/15/21, at 2:35 p.m., with a Licensed Nurse (LN 1), LN 1 stated, the physician's order was its ok to place to put the bed against the wall with one side rail up. LN 1 confirmed 2 side rails were up instead of one. During a review of Resident 82's Physician Orders, dated 11/15/21, at 4:22 p.m., the physician's order indicated, May have bed against the wall and ¼ side rails up x1 for mobility. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Devices & Physical Restraints undated, the P&P indicated, The residents shall be provided an environment that is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update a care plan for one of twenty sampled residents (Resident 85) after returning from the hospital. This failure resulted in improper monitoring of Resident 85 for bleeding episodes related to chronic anticoagulant (commonly known as blood thinners, are chemical substances that prevent or reduce chance of getting a deep vein thrombosis [DVT] - a blood clot) use. Findings: During an interview and concurrent record review, on 11/18/21, at 10:03 a.m., with a licensed nurse (LN 4), Resident 85's admission record dated 11/9/21, was reviewed and the record indicated, Resident 85 was on long term (current) use of anticoagulants. Review of Resident 85's order summary report, dated 11/9/21, indicated, Apixaban (blood thinner) tablet 2.5 MG (milligram) give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for DVT prophylaxis. Apixaban use: Monitor for signs and symptoms of bleeding (abnormal or unexplained bruising, petechiae (unraised, round red spots under the skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0659 — isolated
    Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the activity assistant was trained to provide activities according to resident's preference and interests for one of twenty sampled residents (Resident 35). This failure resulted in Resident 35 not receiving activities that were person centered. Findings: During a review of Resident 35's admission Record, the admission record indicated, Resident 35 was admitted with diagnoses including, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, right side hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), urinary catheter (a tube placed in the body to drain and collect urine from the bladder), and Gastrostomy (a surgical opening into the stomach for nutritional support). During a review of Resident 35's minimum data set (MDS-a standardized, primary screening and assessment tool of health status which forms the foundation of the comprehensive assessment for all residents of long-term care facilities) dated Sep 8, 2021, the MDS indicated: Section C - Cognitive Patterns indicated, Resident 35 had a BIMS score of 0 (brief interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 20 residents (Resident 35) was monitored for signs and symptoms of a urinary tract infection ([UTI] bladder infection). This failure had the potential for the resident to have a catheter (a tube that is inserted into the bladder, allowing urine to drain) associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) Findings: During an observation on 11/17/21, at 2:30 p.m., Resident 35 was observed to have a urinary catheter, the catheter collection bag was hanging under the bed with a blue bag covering the collection bag. During a review of Resident 35's Physician Orders, dated 9/4/21, a physician order indicated, to monitor every shift for signs and symptoms of possible urinary infection and call the physician. During a review of Resident 35's Treatment Administration Record, the treatment records dated October and November 2021 indicated, missing documentation for monitoring of signs and symptoms of infection for 10/21, 10/25, 10/27/21 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain medication was administered as prescribed for one of six sampled residents (Resident 453). This failure had the potential for the resident to have ineffective pain management and resulted in a medication error. Findings: During a review of Resident 453's History & Physical (H&P), dated November 9, 2021, the H&P indicated, Resident 453 was admitted with diagnoses including, right hip total arthroplasty (total hip replacement, removing damaged bone and cartilage and replacing with prosthetic components), right hip pain issues postsurgical (hip pain after surgery). During an observation on 11/16/21, at 8:40 a.m., Licensed Nurse (LN 2) was observed administering Tramadol (used to relieve moderate to moderately severe pain, including pain after surgery) per resident's request for a reported pain level of 7 out of 10 hip pain (pain level measurement, 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain). No other pain medication was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart and narcotic storage boxes were locked, secured, and inaccessible to unauthorized staff, residents, and visitors when one of five medication carts was left unlocked and unattended in a resident hallway. This failure had the potential for visitors, residents, and unauthorized staff to access medications and narcotics stored in the medication cart. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview on 11/15/21, at 11:08 a.m., with the Director of Nurses (DON) and Licensed Nurse (LN 3), the DON was observed walking to an unlocked and unattended medication cart located at Station 2 hallway. The DON pulled the keys out of the narcotics drawer and locked the cart. The DON and LN 3 both confirmed the medication cart and narcotic storage box should always be locked and keys are not to be left in the medication cart unattended. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, MEDICATION STORAGE IN THE FACILITY, dated January 2007, the P&P indicated, .Medication rooms,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-12-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address residents' grievances as indicated by 6 of 12 members (Residents 243, 494, 29, 17, 16, and 25) who attended the resident council meeting during the facility's recertification survey. This failure had the potential to compromise resident's care and safety. Findings: Review of the past three months Resident Council meeting minutes indicated the following issues: call lights not answered timely, staff turned the call lights off without giving the care needed; wandering resident entered multiple rooms uninvited; missing items; food was cold, no flavor, rice and beans were undercooked, open faced sandwich were served closed and meat was tough. The Resident council minutes' log lacked documentation of follow up for the resident council meeting on 9/18/19, 10/16/19, and 11/20/19. There were between 8 to 12 residents in attendance at each meeting. The Resident Council minutes indicated, Old business: Minutes from the previous meeting were read and followed up on. It did not indicate what specific issues were followed up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe food storage practices when they failed to: 1. Remove a dented can from available food supply. 2. Record temperatures and document corrective action for temperatures outside acceptable ranges of refrigerator and freezers. These facility failures had the potential to result in residents developing foodborne illness. Findings: 1. During an observation, and concurrent interview with a dietary cook (DC) on 12/2/19 at 10:10 a.m., a six pound can of green enchilada sauce was observed in the dry storage room with a dent on the lower rim of the can and was available for use. The DC confirmed that the can was dented, and removed the can from resident use. During a review of the facility policy titled Receiving Food and Supplies dated 7/1/16, the policy indicated Do not accept and return to the supplier, any items that are dented, rusted, damaged. 2. During a review of the facility policy and procedure titled Refrigerator/Freezer Temperature Records, revised 7/1/16, indicated Record daily all refrigerator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Infection control surveillance was performed according to facility policy and procedure. 2. Oxygen tubing was labeled for one of three sampled residents (Resident 495). These facility failures had the potential to result in unidentified infections and trends, and the growth of microorganisms. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/4/19 at 10:43 a.m., with a licensed nurse (LN 1) the infection prevention data collection dated May and August 2019 was reviewed. The data collection only included the form IC-01-R. LN 1 confirmed this was not adequate infection surveillance, and policy and procedure for data collection was incomplete. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 1/1/17, indicated, the facility must establish an Infection Prevention and Control Program under which it identifies, investigates, controls, and prevents infections in the Facility. The infection preventionist will review the infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-12-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the antibiotic surveillance logs were completed to monitor trends of antibiotic usage, clinical signs and symptoms, and ensure that the residents who were receiving antibiotics meet the criteria for antibiotic use from January 2019 through April 2019 and June and July of 2019. This deficient practice had the potential for the residents to build resistance to antibiotics and receive medication unnecessarily. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/5/19 at 11:29 a.m., with the administrator (Admin) the data collection for the antibiotic stewardship program according to policy and procedure was not present in the infection preventionist binder, and the infection preventionist was unable to locate this data for the months of January thru April and June through July 2019. This was confirmed by the Admin. The only antibiotic stewardship data present was from the laboratory. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Antibiotic Stewardship Program, dated 1/1/17, indicated The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) status for one of one sampled residents (Resident 32), was consistent when the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated no choice made for artificially administered nutrition orders, and the paper chart indicated No artificial means of nutrition, including feeding tubes. This facility failure had the potential for Resident 32's wishes related to artificial nutrition not to be followed. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review, on 12/3/19, at 9:45 a.m., with a licensed nurse (LN 2), the POLST paper copy in Resident 32's medical chart was reviewed and compared to the physician orders, and the EMR copy of the POLST. LN 2 confirmed the documents did not match in category C artificially administered nutrition. The paper copy of the POLST dated 1/3/19 requested No artificial means of nutrition, including feeding tubes. The EMR copy of the POLST dated 1/3/19 had no choice made for artificially administered nutrition orders. Both were signed by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 47) when Resident 47's care plan for oxygen therapy was not developed upon admission. This facility failure resulted in a care plan that did not include the care and services needed to meet Resident 47's needs. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review, on 12/4/19, at 10:52 a.m., with a licensed nurse (LN 2), the admitting physician orders dated 10/8/19 for Resident 47 included an order for oxygen (O2) at two liters per minute continuous to maintain an 02 saturation greater than 92% every shift. The baseline care plan for Resident 47 dated 10/8/19 and 10/9/19 did not include continuous oxygen therapy and monitoring of oxygen saturation. LN 2 confirmed there was no evidence in the baseline care plan of Resident 47's oxygen requirements, and acknowledged it should have been included. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Care Planning, dated 11/1/17, indicated The Facility will develop a person…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for four out of 24 sampled residents (Residents 82, 75, 47, and 10) when the: 1. Facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident 82 with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes (adult onset of a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar) and dependence on renal dialysis (a medical procedure for people with kidney failure or damage that eliminates waste and unwanted water from the blood). 2. Facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident 75 receiving oxygen therapy. 3. Facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident 47 receiving an anticoagulant. 4. Failed to ensure care plan implementation when the physician was not notified of Resident 10's weight change. These facility failures had the potential for resident care needs to go unmet. Findings: 1. During a review of the admission record for Resident 82 dated 10/29/19, Resident 82's diagnosis include diabetes and kidney failure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services according to professional standards when: 1. Orders were not followed for Resident 75 when receiving oxygen. 2. a. Orders were not followed for Resident 82 for monitoring input and output (I&O). b. Orders were not followed and Resident 27 for monitoring I&O. 3. Orders were not followed for Resident 68 for monitoring I&O. These facility failures resulted in residents not receiving treatment as ordered by the physician. Findings: 1. During an observation on 12/2/19 at 2:56 p.m., Resident 75 was observed to be receiving oxygen at three liters per minute (LPM) by nasal cannula (a device used to deliver oxygen through the nose). During a review of the clinical record for Resident 75 the Physician Order Summary Report dated 12/1/19 indicated Administer oxygen at 2 LPM via nasal cannula to keep oxygen saturation greater than 92% every shift. During an observation and concurrent interview with a licensed nurse (LN 3) on 12/3/19 at 8:45 a.m., Resident 75 was observed to be receiving oxygen at three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were labeled and stored appropriately when: 1. Four expired bottles of sterile saline wound solution (a cleanser for minor cuts and burns) were found in the central supply room. 2. An emergency cart containing medication and supplies was found unlocked and accessible to residents. These facility failures had the potential for expired products with compromised sterility to be used on residents and for residents to have unmonitored access to medications and supplies. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with a central supply clerk (CSC) on [DATE], at 10:13 a.m., four bottles of sterile saline wound solution with an expiration date of [DATE] were found in the central supply room. The CSC confirmed the four bottles of sterile saline wound solution were expired, and removed the bottles. 2. During a concurrent observation and interview with the assistant director of nursing (ADON) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurate for one out of 21 sampled residents (Resident 71) when assessing the atrial venous fistula ( AVF - an access site used for hemodialysis [removing waste and excess fluid from the blood of people with kidney failure]) as ordered by the physician. This facility failure had the potential for Resident 71 to not receive appropriate treatment for AVF complications. Findings: During a review of Resident 71's Order Summary Report, a physician order dated 11/8/19 indicated, Hemodialysis: Monitor Presence of Bruit (sound of blood flow in AVF), use a + or - sign every shift (day, evening and night). During a review Resident 71'sMedication Administration Record (MAR) indicated on 11/23/19 and 12/3/19 there was no entry for one shift. On 11/28/19 and 11/29/19 the bruit presence was documented incorrectly. During an interview with the assistant director of nursing (ADON) on 12/4/19 at 11:43 a.m., the ADON acknowledged the MAR had missing and inaccurate documentation.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$20,703 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $20,703 — penalty dated 2025-12-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ABBY GL LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST92%since 02/21/2019
ELLIE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 02/21/2019
SIMS, JAMESIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/21/2019
CRUZ, JULIOIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 02/21/2019
LYNCH, JOSEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL92%since 02/21/2019
BUKONT, ELISEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
CARLSON, CHADIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/28/2025
ERETZ THOUSAND OAKS PROPERTIES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2019
PURSUE HEALTH LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$964K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 53%Medicare 27%Other / private 20%

This home reported $964K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$469per resident / day
operating cost
$14,264per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$471per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055342. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next