Sunnyside Nursing Center
22617 S. Vermont Ave, Torrance, CA 90502 · Non profit - Corporation · 299 certified beds · (310) 320-4130 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (91) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $214,020 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-10)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.6% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.6% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 0.8% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.6% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.6% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.8% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.1% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.4% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.7% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.2% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.5% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.44 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.25 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 68 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 42.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 50% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.0%CMS range 35.2–59.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 6.0–14.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 42.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 40.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 52.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 90.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 91.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.6%CMS range 4.7–12.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.22 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 299 beds and averages 247.0 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.83 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.19 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
91 citations, most serious first. The 19 most serious are shown; the remaining 72 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 10), who was admitted to the facility from a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) on [DATE], was not administered Baclofen (a medication that relaxes the muscles to relieve spasm, tightness, and cramps) due to a known side effect of confusion, when: 1. Registered Nurse (RN) 1 did not review Resident 10's entire Discharge Instructions dated [DATE] and [DATE] for accuracy, prior to transcribing the orders in Resident 10's chart. 2. RN 1 did not review and clarify conflicting instructions outlined in the GACH's Discharge Instructions dated [DATE] which indicated do not use Baclofen since caused confusion versus the Discharge instructions dated [DATE], which indicated Medications to Continue to Take with no Change which indicated Baclofen 10 milligrams ([mg] metric unit of measurement, used for medication dosage and/or amount) give 0.5 tablet three times daily, with Resident 10's physician. 3. RN 1 administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's Rehabilitation (Rehab) room equipment was not readily accessible for unauthorized use by residents and/or visitors or used as a weapon to hit for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure the Rehab room and equipment located in the Rehab room was secured and supervised at all times to prevent unauthorized access by residents and/or visitors. 2. Ensure Resident 1 did not gain access to a Dowel (a pole or rod used in rehabilitation to improve shoulder mobility and strength) from the facility's Rehab room without staff knowledge. 3. Ensure Resident 1 did not use a Dowel to physically assault Resident 2 and Resident 3. 4. Ensure staff followed the facility Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Safety and Supervision of Residents dated 7/2017, which indicated, the facility has individualized resident centered approach to safety, addresses safety and accident hazards for individual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who was assessed at risk for wandering (moving around inside the facility without awareness of personal safety, potentially putting themselves in harm's way), did not elope (the act of leaving a facility unsupervised and without prior authorization) from the facility for one of nine sampled residents (Resident 1). The facility failed to: 1. Have a system in place to supervise and monitor Resident 1's whereabouts to prevent him from eloping from the facility. 2. Develop a care plan with interventions addressing Resident 1's risk for wandering, to ensure the resident's safety, and prevent him from eloping from the facility. 3. Ensure staff followed the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled Wandering Residents - No Facility Wide Wandering Notification System dated 11/2016, that indicated residents at risk for wandering shall have a care plan implemented with interventions appropriate to the resident to help prevent wandering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent an avoidable, facility acquired, unstageable (when the stage is not clear, the base of the wound is covered by a layer of dead tissue that may be yellow, grey, green, brown, or black) pressure injury (damage to the skin and underlying structures caused by unrelieved pressure) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by: 1. Failing to reposition Resident 1 every two hours as per physician's orders. 2. Failing to implement its Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Wound Care Suggestions and Documentation, dated 2/2025 which indicated Residents who were unable to turn independently would be turned and repositioned every two hours and would be checked for incontinence (loss of voluntary control of bowel and bladder movements) every two hours. As a result of these deficient practices, Resident 1 who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with intact skin (no wounds) on the Sacrococcyx (area where sacrum [triangular bone at the base of the spine]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 3) was not subjected to abuse by Resident 1, when Resident 1 without authorization obtained a Dowel (a pole or rod used in rehabilitation to improve shoulder mobility and strength) from the facility's Rehabilitation (Rehab) room and used the Dowel as a weapon and struck Resident 1 on her right arm, right shoulder and face. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure the Rehab room and equipment located in the Rehab room was secured and supervised at all times to prevent unauthorized access by residents and/or visitors. 2. Ensure Resident 1 did not gain access to the Dowel from the facility's Rehab room without staff knowledge or permission. 3. Ensure Resident 1 did not use the Dowel as a weapon to physically assault Resident 2 and Resident 3. 4. Ensure staff followed the facility Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Prevention, Reporting and Correction of Inappropriate Conduct, Including Abuse Neglect…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not develop a Stage II ( partial-thickness loss of skin, presenting as a shallow open sore or wound) pressure injury ( a localized pressure related damage to the skin and or underlying tissue) to sacrococcyx (bones at the base of the spine) area which progressed to a Stage IV (wound that penetrate all layers of skin exposing muscles, tendons [tissue that unites a muscle with a bone] cartilage {tissue that lines a joint}, and bones caused by prolonged pressure on the skin) pressure injury for one of one sampled residents (Resident 36). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident 36 received treatment to a Stage II sacrococcyx pressure injury for 14 days from 11/8/2024-11/21/2024 as ordered by the physician. 2. Ensure Treatment Nurse (TX) assessed Resident 36 sacrococcyx pressure injury on weekly basis from 10/13/2024 to 12/12/2024 to prevent Resident 36's pressure injury from getting worse from Stage II to Stage IV. 3.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident, who was a high risk for falls and injuries, did not fall and sustain injury for one of three sampled residents (Resident 136). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA 2) did not leave Resident 136 unsupervised in the bathroom to go to assist another resident. 2. Ensure CNA 2 followed the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Fall Prevention and Management Program dated 2/2025, which indicated the facility must ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistive devices ( devices that are designed to assist a person to perform a particular task) to prevent accidents. 3. Ensure staff followed Resident 136's care plan titled The resident is at risk for falls dated 9/27/2023 to anticipate and use of assistive device front wheel walker ( [FWW ] a mobility aid with two wheels on the front and two legs on the back) as needed. These deficient practices resulted in Resident 136 falling on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who could not bear weight on her left leg, was transferred using a mechanical lift according to the care plan and [NAME] (a communication tool to access important and resident data regarding care). Resident 1 was transferred from her bed using two staff to physically lift Resident 1 from her bed and fell. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 being lifted from her bed by two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA 1 and CNA 2) who used Resident 1's underarms to attempt to transfer Resident 1 from her bed to a wheelchair. The two CNAs lost control of Resident 1 who slid from her bed and landed on her knees on the floor. Resident 1 was later found with swelling, bruising and an abrasion (a scrape) to her left knee. Resident 1 sustained swelling and effusion (a buildup of fluid inside a joint such as a swollen ankle or knee) to her left knee with an order to apply a topical antibiotic to her left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a resident, who had a diagnosis of a diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2 [a chronic disease characterized by elevated levels of blood glucose (or blood sugar) in a bloodstream] and was receiving Insulin [a hormone that lowers the level of glucose [a type of sugar in blood]) based on sliding scale (the increasing administration of pre-meal insulin dose based on the blood sugar [b/s] level before meals) coverage, did not have their b/s monitoring and insulin administration abruptly discontinued for one of six sampled residents (Resident 5). 2. Ensure a resident, who had a physician's order for monthly laboratory test of a complete blood count with differential ([CBC] a laboratory test which gives information about the production of all blood cells in the body) and a basic metabolic panel ([BMP] a group of blood tests which provide information about the body's metabolism [chemical reaction in the body's cells which change food into energy]) was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one (1) out of three (3) sampled residents' (Resident 1) personal property from theft and loss in accordance with the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Theft and Loss when the facility lost Resident 1's wallet containing his California Identification Card (CAID).The facility failed to:1.Follow up and replace Residents 1's missing CAID This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 not having his CAID replaced for over two (2) years after the loss was reported and had the potential to cause Resident 1 to feel helpless and forgotten. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include muscle weakness and chronic pulmonary embolism (when a blood clot blocks and stops blood flow to an artery in the lung).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 3/18/2026, the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolatedHonor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and a review of records, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) had her right to receive visitors of her choice and to have her visitation preferences considered prior to imposing restrictions.This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 being unable to receive visits from her son in her room as she preferred, and had the potential to negatively impact her emotional well being, quality of life, and resident rights.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), cerebral infarction (loss of blood flow to a part of the brain), and diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 1/28/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 was dependent (helper does…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide necessary activities of daily living ([ADLs] daily self-care activities) care and services for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and 2), who were dependent (helper does all the work) on staff for incontinence care (the help someone gets when they have accidental urine or stool leaks). This was evidenced by the following: 1.Resident 1 was observed with a soiled incontinence brief (diaper) containing urine and stool.2.Resident 2 was observed with urine-soiled towel positioned between her legs, which was not consistent with facility practice for managing incontinence.These deficient practices placed Resident 1 and 2 at risk for skin breakdown, worsening skin integrity, infection, discomfort, compromised dignity and decreased quality of life. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses including hemiplegia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control and prevention designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to:1.Ensure ongoing assessment and monitoring of Resident 1's gastrostomy tube ([GT] a soft tube surgically inserted directly into the stomach to administer medication, fluids and nutrition) for signs of deterioration or contamination.2.Ensure appropriate infection prevention measures were implemented for Resident 1 being treated for suspected scabies (a contagious skin infestation caused by tiny, [mites]- closely related to spiders and ticks).These deficient practices had the potential to result in the transmission of infectious conditions, delayed identification of infection-related concerns, impaired delivery of medications and nutrition, and increased risk of infection and other adverse health outcomes.Findings:During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive person-centered Care Plans were reviewed and revised by the Interdisciplinary Team ([IDT] a group of medical professionals from different disciplines who work together to help a resident achieve their goals) when a resident (Resident 5) refused care for one of four sampled residents (Resident 5). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 5's care needs and preferences to be unidentified and Resident 5 to continue refusing care which could negatively affect her quality of life and well-being.Findings:During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 5 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 5 had diagnoses including cerebral infarction ([stroke] loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) with hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, trunk on the same side of the body), hemiparesis (a slight paralysis or weakness on one side of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 5), who required two-person assistance from staff to perform her activities of daily living ([ADLs] activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily), that those ADLs were performed in a timely manner. This deficient practice had resulted in Resident 5 feeling neglected and had the potential to negatively impact her dignity and quality of life.Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 5 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 5 had diagnoses including cerebral infarction ([stroke] loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) with hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, trunk on the same side of the body), hemiparesis (a slight paralysis or weakness on one side of the body), and lack of coordination. During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) 1 completed and accurately documented the Discharge Summary for one of two sampled residents (Resident 6) when Resident 6 was discharged home on 4/13/2026.This deficient practice resulted in Resident 6's skin condition not depicted accurately upon Resident 6's discharge and had the potential for his continuity of care to be interrupted and/or delayed.Findings:During a review of Resident 6's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 6 had diagnoses including multiple pressure ulcers ([pressure injury] localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) and type 2 diabetes mellitus ([DM] a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing).During a review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool) dated 4/14/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 6 was able…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility's water boiler was maintained and in proper working condition to provide residents with consistent access to hot water for bathing and personal hygiene.These failures resulted in residents being unable to access hot water consistently for bathing, which is necessary to maintain comfort, hygiene, and a safe living environment.Findings:During an interview on 4/8/2026 at 10:48 a.m. with Resident 220, Resident 220 stated the facility runs out of hot water in the mornings because the kitchen uses all the hot water. Resident 220 stated for the past couple of weeks had to shower early in the morning to avoid receiving a cold shower. During an interview on 4/8/2026 at 12:08 p.m. with Resident 171, she stated that on 4/5/2026 (Sunday) and 4/6/2026 (Monday) she refused to shower because the water was cold. Resident 171 stated cold water was uncomfortable and did not kill germs, and she did not feel as clean after using it. She also stated she has bowls in her closet that the CNAs fill with water for her bed baths,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to have a safe, and homelike environment for six of five sampled residents ( Resident 56, 171,220,273,139 and Resident 31. The facility failed to:1.Ensure the room clocks for Resident 139, 31, and 56 room displayed the correct time.This failure had the potential to cause confusion and disorientation for Resident 139, Resident 31 and Resident 56 and staff.2. Ensure hot water was consistently available at the bathroom sink in Resident 56's room and ensure hot water was available for showers for Resident 171, 220, and 273.This resulted in delays in providing Resident 56 with bed baths and other activities of daily living (ADL-daily self-care activities) and Resident 171, 220 and 273 unable to shower in comfortable water temperature due to the lack of consistently available hot water.Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 139's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 139 was initially admitted to facility on 12/28/23 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control practices for two of three sampled residents (Residents 242 and 180). The facility failed to:1.Sanitize the blood pressure (BP) cuff and stethoscope(instrument used to hear heart beat) before using them during Resident 242's 9:00 a.m. medication administration.2.Perform hand hygiene on two separate occasions while takingResident 242's blood pressure during Resident 242's 9:00 a.m. medication administration.3.Perform hand hygiene before distributing the lunchtime meal trays.4.Perform hand hygiene while providing care to Resident 180.These failures had the potential for cross contamination (the transfer of bacteria, viruses, microorganisms, or other harmful substances from one surface to another through improper or unsanitary equipment, procedures, or products) and the transmission of infectious agents.Findings: During a review of Resident 242's admission Record, the admission Record indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 72 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to privacy and dignity was maintained during care and while in common areas for one of three sampled residents (Resident 256).This failure resulted in Resident 256 being visibly exposed on multiple occasions, with legs and indwelling urinary catheter (foley catheter-a tube inserted into the bladder [tubing] drains the urine into a collection bag) tubing observable to others, which had the potential to cause embarrassment, decreased self-esteem and self-worth.Findings:During a review of Resident 256's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 256 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a progressive disorder that affects movement), and atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat). During a review of Resident 256's History and Physical (H&P), the H&P indicated Resident 256 has limited decision-making capacity.During a review of Resident 256's Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:1.Ensure three of four sampled residents (Resident 241,193, and 120) call light device was within reach to each resident.This deficient practice had the potential to result in the residents being unable to summon health care workers for assistance with care and services as needed.2.Provide a safe and appropriate bed frame for one of one sampled resident (Resident 58).This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for skin breakdown, discomfort, and an inability to safely position himself in bed, creating a potential for accident hazards. Findings: 1, During a review of Resident 241's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 241 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including overactive bladder (causes a sudden, uncontrollable urge to urinate), paraplegia, unspecified, (partial or complete paralysis of the lower half of the body), and anxiety disorder, unspecified (emotion characterized by feelings of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) accurately reflected the care and services provided to one of three sampled residents (Resident 7)This deficient practice resulted in the transmission of inaccurate data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) regarding Resident 7's health status and individual healthcare needs.Findings:During a review of Resident 7's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 7's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities).During a review of Resident 7's MDS dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 7's cognition (ability to think, understand, learn, and remember) was severely impaired. The MDS indicated Resident 7 was dependent (helper does all of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of three sampled residents (Resident 139) received a bed bath and an incontinent (loss of the ability to control urine and feces) pad change on 4/7/2026. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 139 experiencing itching and scratching from a wet incontinent pad, lowered self esteem, and appearing emotional while in the facility.Findings:During a review of Resident 139's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 139 was initially admitted to facility on 12/28/23 and readmitted on [DATE]. The admission Record indicated a diagnosis that included type 2 diabetes ( a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) with hyperglycemia (elevated blood sugar), long time use of insulin (a hormone that removes excess sugar from the blood, can be produced by the body or given artificially via medication) and hyperlipidemia (high level of oil/fat in the body).During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident 242 received ferrous sulfate (iron - mineral) and carvedilol (blood pressure medications) as prescribed on 4/10/2026 at 9:00 a.m.This failure had the potential to prevent the medications from maintaining a therapeutic dose level (a level in the blood needed for the medication to work effectively) when medications are not administered according to the physician's orders.Findings:During an observation on 4/8/2026 at 9:28 a.m. in Resident 242's room, Licensed Vocational Nurse 4 (LVN 4) was observed preparing and administering the resident's 9:00 a.m. medications. LVN 4 did not prepare or administer Resident 242's 9:00 a.m. ferrous sulfate or carvedilol as ordered by the physician. The carvedilol was not administered because the medication was not available.During a review of Resident 242's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 242 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5 percent % (percent) during medication pass for one of seven sampled residents (Residents 242) by failing to:1.Administer ferrous sulfate (iron-mineral) and carvedilol (blood pressure medication) as prescribed by Resident 242's physician.These deficient practices resulted in a medication administration error rate of 6.9%, which exceeded the 5% threshold and medications not to maintain a therapeutic dose level (maintain a certain level in your blood to work well) when not administering medications according to physician's orders.Findings:During a review of Resident 242's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 242 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The admission Record indicated Resident 242 with diagnosis including anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells), hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored safely and in accordance with manufacturer expiration dates and facility policy. The facility failed to:1.Remove expired medications, expired vaccines from medication rooms2. Replaced an outdated insulin emergency kit (Ekit- emergency medication used to treat high blood sugar) after it was last on 11/16/2025.These failure had the potential to result in ineffective treatment, delayed access to emergency medications, and compromised resident safety for residents who received these medications.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/7/2026 at 11:00 a.m. with Registered Nurse Supervisor 3 (RNS 3), in medication room [ROOM NUMBER], observed a container of Gavilyte -G sol (laxative) with an expiration date of 6/16/2025. RNS 3 stated staff must discard expired medications because they may no longer be effective and should not be given to a resident.During a concurrent observation and interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dental services for one of three sampled residents (Resident 198).This failure had the potential to lead to weight loss, inability to chew effectively, pain, or infection of the mouth.Findings:During a review of Resident 198's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 198 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and hypertension (HTN- high blood pressure).During a review of Resident 198's Dental Care Consult Note dated 2/11/2026, the Dental Care Consult Note indicated Resident 198 had tooth pain and an infected tooth and agreed to a tooth extraction (removal).During a review of Resident 198's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 2/13/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 198's cognition (ability to think, understand, learn, and remember) was moderately impaired. The MDS indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolatedEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to ensure lunch trays for two of two sampled residents (Resident 24 and Resident 5) were served in a timely manner.This failure resulted in Resident 24 and Resident 5 receiving their lunch trays more than one hour late.Findings:During a review of Resident 24's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 24 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), hypokalemia (abnormally low potassium levels), gastro-esophageal reflux (a chronic condition where stomach acid frequently flows back into the esophagus), and chronic kidney disease (a progressive, long-term condition where damaged kidneys cannot filter blood properly).During a review of Resident 24's History and Physical (H&P) dated 10/31/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 24 had the capacity to understand and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and thaw food items safely. The facility failed to:1.Ensure garlic powder, corn starch, kosher salt, and macaroni were labeled with open dates.2.Ensure frozen chicken was thawed under cold running water.3.Ensure the temperature of milk on the breakfast tray line (where food is plated for service) was maintained below 41 degrees Farenheight ( F unit of measure).These failures had the potential to expose residents to food borne illnesses (any illness resulting from eating food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, or parasites).Findings:During an observation on 4/7/2026 at 8:10 a.m. in the kitchen, a open container of garlic powder, corn starch, kosher salt and macaroni, was observed without open dates. Frozen chicken was observed being defrosted in the sink in a container of stagnant water.During an observation on 4/9/2026 at 7:02 a.m. in the kitchen during breakfast tray line, the temperature of the milk was observed to be 55 F.During an interview on 4/10/2026 at 9:47 a.m. with the Cook, the [NAME]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate and complete medication documentation for two of six sampled residents (Residents 214 and 242).1.For Resident 242, the MAR indicated the resident received ferrous sulfate (iron) on 4/10/2026 at 10:03 a.m., but the medication was observed not to have been administered during the medication pass.2.For Resident 214, the Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented that the resident received a COVID 19 vaccine (respiratory illness) and a pneumonia (PNA respiratory infection) vaccine on 3/12/2026 at 11:29 p.m.; however, both vaccines were observed in the medication refrigerator on 4/7/2026, indicating the vaccines were not administered as documented.These failures had the potential to result in inaccurate clinical records and place residents at risk for unmet medical needs and potential adverse health outcomes.Findings:During an observation on 4/8/2026 at 9:28 a.m. in Resident 242's room, Licensed Vocational Nurse 4 (LVN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure coordinated and comprehensive hospice (compassionate care for people who are near the end of life provided at the person's home or within a health care facility) services for one of three sampled residents (Resident 7)The facility failed to:1. Develop and implement an individualized and person-centered care plan for Resident 7 by failing to ensure coordination of care between the facility and the hospice provider for Resident 7. 2.Ensure Resident 7 hospice eligibility were reassessed after showing clinical improvements.These failures had the potential for Resident 7 to receive care that did not reflect her current clinical condition, needs, or appropriate hospice eligibility.Findings:During a review of Resident 7's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 7's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to:Ensure physician ordered laboratory test (a medical test of a sample oof blood) was collected in a timely manner for 2 of 10 residents (Resident 1 and Resident 9).Ensure the physician was notified the laboratory test ordered was not performed for 2 of 10 residents (Resident 1 and Resident 9).This failure had the potential to result in delay in diagnosis, lack of timely medical intervention, and worsening of residents' condition due to the physician not being notified that the ordered laboratory tests were not completed.Findings:A. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 12/8/2024 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), hypertension (HTN - high blood pressure), and hyperlipidemia (unhealthy high fat levels in the blood).During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) was free from rough handling and treated with dignity and respect, while being assisted by Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1. This deficient practice resulted in a purplish discoloration to the left thumb, emotional distress, and loss of dignity and trust in staff. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple fractures (broken bones) of the ribs (right side), and motor vehicle accident (car accident). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H& P) dated 9/19/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS]resident assessment tool) dated 9/14/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had normal cognitive function and required dependent (helper does all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that required fall-prevention interventions were implemented for one of three residents (Resident 1) by failing to:1. Implement the Falling Star Program (is a fall prevention initiative used to identify and alert staff, that a patient or resident is at high risk of falling) upon admission.2. Ensure the use of floor mats (safety devices, often specifically designed to be low-profile and impact-absorbing, used to help prevent falls and reduce the severity of injuries if a fall occurs).3. Obtain a bed alarm (a safety device for residents at risk of falling, typically a pressure-sensitive pad placed on the bed).4. Revise Resident 1's care plan after the first fall.5. Notify the physician of Resident 1's unsafe behavior (repeatedly attempting to get out of bed). These failures resulted in Resident 1 having two avoidable falls on 11/7/2025 and 11/8/2025. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its abuse prevention policy by failing to report suspected abuse to the State Survey Agency within 2 hours after the allegation for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). As a result of this deficient practice, facility residents including Resident 1 were placed at risk for potential continued abuse, injuries, psychosocial harm and delay in care and investigation.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute kidney failure (a condition in which the kidneys no longer function normally) and chronic heart failure (a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 9/17/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive (ability to learn, reason, remember,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 9), whose preference to have a shower instead of a bed bath, was honored. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 9 receiving bed baths on multiple occasions when his preference was to have a shower. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 9 to feel disrespected and uncomfortable during his stay at the facility.Findings: During a review of Resident 9's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of orthopedic aftercare (ongoing care and treatment after a bone, joint, or muscle procedure to help with proper healing, regain strength and movement) following a left leg below the knee amputation ([BKA] a surgical removal of the portion of the leg below the knee. During a review of Resident 9's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool) dated 7/21/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 9 was able to make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was created to include a Fall Management Program for one of two sampled residents (Resident 16), who was assessed at high risk for falls, per the facility's policy and procedure (P/P). This deficient practice resulted in the care needs for Resident 16 not being thoroughly addressed and placed Resident 16 at risk for falls and injuries. Findings: During a review of Resident 16's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including cerebral infarction ([stroke] loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) with left side hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body). During a review of Resident 16's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool) dated 8/4/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 16 was able to make decisions that were reasonable and consistent and she required a one person assist to complete her activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolatedHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a QAPI (Quality Assurance/Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement - a data driven proactive approach to improvement used to ensure services are meeting quality standards) plan was implemented after being made aware of a deficient practice and failure of the facility, when one of three sampled residents (Resident 10), who was admitted to the facility from a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) on 8/15/2025, was administered Baclofen (a medication that relaxes the muscles to relieve spasm, tightness, and cramps) with a known side effect of confusion, when: 1. Registered Nurse (RN) 1 did not review Resident 10's entire Discharge Instructions dated 8/14/2025 and 8/15/2025 for accuracy, prior to transcribing the orders in Resident 10's chart. 2. RN 1 did not review and clarify conflicting instructions outlined in the GACH's Discharge Instructions dated 8/14/2025 which indicated do not use Baclofen since caused confusion versus the Discharge instructions dated 8/15/2025, which indicated Medications to Continue to Take…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from neglect when staff did not provide timely incontinence care and left Resident 1 soiled with urine and feces, with a towel placed between his legs and failed to perform incontinent care.This failure compromised Resident 1's dignity and created potential for harm including risk for skin breakdown, and infection. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (blockage of blood flow to the brain, leading to tissue damage or death), malignant neoplasm of rectum (cells in the rectal lining grow uncontrollably and abnormally), and vascular dementia (conditions that damage blood vessels in the brain). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H& P) dated 10/18/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 1 did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1, who had an existing pressure ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin), was left in urine and feces for an extended period of time.This failure had the potential for worsening of pressure ulcers and placed Resident 1 at risk for further skin breakdown, infection, and delayed wound healing.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (blockage of blood flow to the brain, leading to tissue damage or death), malignant neoplasm of rectum (cells in the rectal lining grow uncontrollably and abnormally), and vascular dementia (conditions that damage blood vessels in the brain). During a review of Resident 1's History…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident 2) who was incontinent (involuntary voiding of urine and stool) of bowel (stool) and bladder (urine), and had a urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) perineal care (the cleaning and maintenance of the area between the anus and genitals, which is essential for maintaining good hygiene, preventing infections, and promoting overall health and well-being) was properly provided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2).This failure had the potential for Resident 2 to have an exacerbation (the worsening of a disease, symptom, or problem) of her current UTI which could result in unnecessary hospitalization and sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection). Findings:During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to address offloading (minimizing or removing weight placed on a bony prominence to help prevent and heal ulcers) while Resident 1 was up in the wheelchair daily. This deficient practice had the potential to contribute to the decline in Resident 1's unstageable (when the stage is not clear, the base of the wound is covered by a layer of dead tissue that may be yellow, grey, green, brown, or black) pressure injury (unrelieved pressure causes damage to the skin and underlying structures). Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including post laminectomy syndrome (failed back surgery syndrome which causes lingering pain), disease of the spinal cord, malignant neoplasm of the kidney (kidney cancer), and malignant neoplasm of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident 5) who had impaired mobility, orders for physical therapy ([PT] a healthcare specialty that focusses on restoring, maintaining, and improving physical function and movement) and occupational therapy ([OT] a healthcare specialty that focusses and helps people of all ages participate in meaningful daily activities) evaluation and treatment were carried out for one of five sampled residents (Resident 5). This deficient practice resulted in a 30-day delay in treatment and services for Resident 5 and placed Resident 5 at risk for further decline. Findings: During a review of Resident 5 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle wasting (weakening, shrinking, and loss of muscle), atrophy (the decrease in size and wasting of muscle tissue), and muscle weakness (a lack of muscle strength). During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Restorative Nurse Assistant 1 ([RNA 1] assists patient in maintaining and improving their physical and cognitive function, primarily focusing on maximizing their independence with activities of daily [ADLs] activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily) doffed (carefully removing personal protective equipment [PPE - clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments] to reduce the risk of contamination to self, other, or the surrounding environment) upon exiting a resident ' s room (Resident 4), who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions ([EBP] involve gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities for residents at risk for Multidrug-Resistant Organisms ([MDRO] bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics) for one of five sampled resident ' s (Resident 4). This failure had the potential to result in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled resident ' s (Resident 1) responsible party ' s (RP 1) complaint ' s regarding Resident 1 ' s Activities of Daily Living (ADLs – activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily) care was formally logged as a grievance (complaint) and investigated as indicated in the facility ' s policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Grievances/Complaints, Filing. This deficient practice resulted in a violation of Resident 1 ' s RP rights and a potential delay in the care and delivery of services to Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (airways that carry air to lungs become narrow and damaged), tracheostomy status (a surgical procedure to create an opening through the neck into the windpipe that provides an air passage to help you breathe when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct an Interdisciplinary Team ([IDT] health care professionals who work together with the resident to plan the residents plan of care) meeting timely for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) and failed to ensure Resident 1 ' s Responsible Party (RP1) was given the opportunity to meet with the IDT regularly per the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Care plans, Comprehensive Person Centered. These deficient practices resulted in a violation of RP1 ' s rights and had the potential to delay person centered care interventions to Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Facesheet), indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (airways that carry air to lungs become narrow and damaged), tracheostomy status (a surgical procedure to create an opening through the neck into the windpipe that provides an air passage to help you…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) received necessary care and treatment by failing to: a. Assess Resident 1's left foot after Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA1) ' s water bottle fell on Resident 1's left foot on 9/3/2024. b. Reassess and monitor Resident 1's left big toe after a change of condition (COC- a sudden clinically important deviation from a patient's baseline in physical, cognitive, behavioral, or functional condition relating to an infection) on 10/3/2024 when Resident 1 had worsening pain on Resident 1's left big toe with swelling, tender to touch and with yellow minimal drainage. These failures had the potential for Resident 1's left big toe wound to decline, affect the healing process, and not implement appropriate interventions in a timely manner. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: a. Ensure Lysol bleach cleaner was not stored in the dry food storage area. b. Ensure the drain to the ice machine was free from dirt and debris. c. Ensure prepared food items in the refrigerator had the prepare date and the use by date. d. Ensure the freezer temperature logs were completed daily. These failures have the potential to expose residents to food-borne illnesses (any illness resulting from ingestion of food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, or parasites) and put residents at risk for cross contamination (unintentional transfer of harmful bacteria from one object to another). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/11/2025, at 8:27 a.m. with the Assistant [NAME] in the dry food storage area, a bottle of Lysol bleach cleaner was observed hanging off of a shelf. The Assistant [NAME] stated Lysol bleach cleaner should not be stored in the dry food storage there could be a chemical spill and leak into the product and could potentially be fatal. During a concurrent observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for two of six sampled residents (Resident 22 and Resident 100) by failing to: 1. Ensure call light (communication device used by residents to enable them to call for help from staff) was answered in a timely manner when Resident 22 was complaining of pain and screaming for help. 2. Ensure Resident 100's call light was within reach and not clipped in the curtain when resident was asking for someone to help her. These failures had the potential to put Resident 22 and 100 at risk for delayed treatment and care which lead to not meeting their needs. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 22's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the left side of the body following a stoke)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medication error rate was less than five percent (%). Ten medication errors out of 29 total opportunities contributed to an overall medication error rate of 34.48 % for four of six residents (Resident 129, 80, 12, 230) observed during medication administration (MedPass). The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident 129's Amlodipine (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) 5.0 (five) milligrams ([mg] - a unit of measure for weight) powder from the crushed medication was mixed with water before administration and medication cup was rinsed with water to ensure resident received the full dose via gastrostomy tube ([GT] - a soft tube surgically inserted into the stomach to administer medications, fluids, and nutrition). 2. Resident 80 was reassessed for abnormal blood pressure (BP) values (systolic blood pressure [SBP- top number] and diastolic blood pressure [DBP - bottom number] measured in millimeters of mercury ( [mm Hg]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one out of six sampled residents (Resident 12) was free of a significant medication error. The facility failed ensure Resident 12 was administered medication that included seizure (convulsions, is a sudden rush of abnormal electrical activity in your brain) medications, Phenytoin and Phenobarbital and an anticoagulant (blood thinner) medication Heparin was administered as ordered and not close to the next scheduled dose for Phenytoin and Heparin. (Cross reference: F759) The deficient practice of failing to administer medications in accordance with the physician orders increased the risk that Residents 12 may experience adverse reactions, complications, that could lead to a decline in the residents' condition, harm, or hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Resident 12's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses including hemiplegia and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to observe infection control practices by failing to: 1.Ensure oxygen tubing and bags were changed and labeled weekly for Residents 126 and 500. 2.Ensure tube feeding and water bags were changed and labeled for Resident 218. 3.Ensure the licensed nurse removed her personal protective equipment (PPE- clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments.) when exiting Resident 517's room and prior to walking out into the hallway. 4.Ensure the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) will call housekeeping to properly clean the floor in Resident 106's room after feces are found scattered in the floor. 5.Ensure a visitor was educated and informed about the use of PPE) was worn when entering Resident 169's room who had Candida Auris(C. Auris- a yeast that can cause severe infections, including bloodstream infections and often resistant to antifungal medications , difficult to treat and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review , the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced a resident's dignity and respect on one of three sampled residents (Resident 17) by standing over the resident while assisting her during a meal. This failure had the potential to result in decreased self-esteem and self-worth on Resident 17. Findings: During a review of Resident 17's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses that included cerebral ischemia(condition that occurs when there is a reduction of blood to the brain), dementia( a progressive state of decline in mental abilities),and dysphagia(difficulty of swallowing). During a review of Resident 17's History and Physical (H&P),dated 7/26/2024, the H&P indicated the resident did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 17's Minimum Data Set (MDS- resident assessment tool),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-15 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistance (CNA7) close the privacy curtain to ensure a resident would not be visually exposed to the roommates and others while providing personal care for residents 1 out or 10 sample resident (Resident 23). This deficient practice violated the resident's right for privacy. Findings: During review of Resident 23's admission Records , the admission record indicated Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses anxiety (conditions that cause excessive and persistent feelings of fear or worry that can interfere with daily life), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), Schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior). During a review of Resident 23's Minimum Data Set (MDS aresident assessment tool), dated 10/01/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 23'srequired dependent (helper does ALL the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-15 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to reassess the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review ( PASARR - a federal assessment requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are placed in facilities that can provide the appropriate care) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) by failing to ensure PASRR level 1 was submitted when the resident was diagnosed with mental illness and was placed on antipsychotic medicine (medicines used to treat mental illnesses ). This deficient practice placed Resident 3 at risk of not receiving necessary care and services they need. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses that included unspecified psychosis(a severe mental condition in which thought, and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with reality), end stage renal disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two of five reviewed residents (Resident 129 and 80) were administered blood pressure medications safely and in accordance with physician's orders and by failing to ensure: 1. Resident 129's Amlodipine (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) 5.0 (five) milligrams ([mg] - a unit of measure for weight) powder from the crushed medication was mixed with water before administration and medication cup was rinsed with water to ensure resident received the full dose via gastrostomy tube ([GT] - a soft tube surgically inserted into the stomach to administer medications, fluids, and nutrition). This deficient practice placed Residents 129 at risk for GT clogging leading to discomfort/pain and GT replacement and not receiving full dose of BP medication (Amlodipine). 2. Resident 80 was reassessed for abnormal blood pressure (BP) values (systolic blood pressure [SBP- top number] and diastolic blood pressure [DBP - bottom number] measured in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. During a review of Resident 28's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or paralysis on one side of the body) following unspecified cerebrovascular disease (condition that affect the blood vessels in the brain and spinal cord) affecting left non-dominant side and unspecified asthma (chronic lung disease). During a review of Resident 28's MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 28's cognition was not intact, and was dependent for eating, hygiene, and bathing. During a review of Resident 28's Physician Order Summary, the Physician Order Summary indicated an order for Ipratropium-Albuterol Inhalation Solution 0.5-2.5 (3) milligrams (mg- a unit of measurement) /3 milliliters (ml - a unit of measurement), 3 ml inhale orally every 6 hours as needed for wheezing (a high-pitched, whistling sound that occurs when air…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor food request and food preferences of one of two sampled residents (Resident 76) by ensuring requested food is provided and accommodated. This failure had the potential to place Resident 76 at risk of not having her nutritional needs met. Findings: During a review of Resident 76's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), pulmonary hypertension(a condition where the blood pressure in the lungs is higher than normal). During a review of Resident 76's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 11/20/2024, the MDS indicated the resident had an intact cognition (thought process) and was dependent (helper does all the effort) on staff with toileting hygiene, bathing, lower body dressing ( the ability to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-15 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to establish a system for: 1. Medication Management and safety by reducing medication errors and ensure accurate medication administration to enhance resident safety. 2. Falls and fall -related injuries by minimizing the occurrence of falls among residents and reduce the severity of fall-related injuries. 3. Pressure ulcers monitoring for residents who are at risk for developing or acquiring pressure ulcers. These deficient practices resulted for residents not receiving medically related necessary care, resulting in medication errors, injury related to falls, lack of monitoring and document pressures injuries. Findings: During an interview on 02/15/2025 at 7:51 p.m. with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated all what they are working, but cannot proved how to prevent highest medication errors rate, how to present fall and injury, and how to over and present pressure injury. There were no safety measures in place to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-15 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the antibiotic stewardship program policy when the antibiotic (a substance used to kill bacteria and to treat infections) did not meet Loeb's or McGeer's Criteria (criteria used to determine appropriate use of antibiotics) for two of three sampled residents (Resident 98) receiving ampicillin (antibiotic used to treat bacterial infections). This deficient practice had the potential to increase antibiotic resistance and provide antibiotics without justification. Findings: During a review of Resident 98's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 98 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or paralysis on one side of the body) following unspecified cerebrovascular infarction (CVA-stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) affecting left non-dominant side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to offer, educate, and track influenza vaccinations for residents per facility's policy for one or five sampled residents (Resident 218). This failure had the potential to place all residents at risk for infection of influenza. Findings: During a review of Resident 218's admission record , the admission Record indicated Resident 218 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or paralysis on one side of the body) following unspecified cerebrovascular infarction (CVA-stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) affecting left non-dominant side. During a review of Resident 218's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 12/20/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 218's cognition (ability to learn, reason, remember, understand, and make decisions) was moderately impaired and was dependent for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-15 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to offer, educate, and track coronavirus vaccinations for residents per facility's policy for two or five sampled residents (Resident 218 and Resident 121). This failure had the potential to place all residents at risk for infection of coronavirus. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 218's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 218 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or paralysis on one side of the body) following unspecified cerebrovascular infarction (CVA-stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) affecting left non-dominant side. During a review of Resident 218's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 12/20/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 218's cognition (ability to learn, reason, remember, understand, and make decisions) was moderately impaired and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement resident centered care plans for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) who had a history of a craniectomy (procedure which permanently removes a portion of the skull to access the brain) and pressure ulcer/injury (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 1 ' s Responsible Party (RP) 1 was provided updates regarding Resident 1 ' s wound care treatments as agreed upon during the Interdisciplinary team meeting (IDT health care professionals from different professional disciplines who work together to manage resident goals) meeting held on 11/1/2024. 2. Ensure Resident 1 was wearing a helmet during her transport to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) 2 on 11/7/2024. These failures resulted in violating Resident 1 and RP 1 ' s rights to actively participate in Resident 1 ' s plan of care and had the potential for Resident 1 to have a head…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff did not reverse (incorrectly classifying a healing pressure ulcer/injury) a pressure ulcer/injury (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2). These deficient practices resulted in inaccurate wound staging for Resident 2 and had the potential in a delay in care and services leading to a decline in Resident 2 ' s physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertensive heart failure (damage to heart due related to high blood pressure), muscle wasting (loss of muscle and strength) and peripheral vascular disease (PVD – a slow progressive narrowing of the blood flow to the arms and legs). During a review of Resident 2's Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a resident centered care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) who has a history of banging her arms against the side rails (a bar or board positioned at the side of the bed which help people get in and out of the bed and help reposition themselves in bed). This deficient practice placed Resident 1 at risk for skin bruising, skin tears and skin breakdown, and placed Resident 1 at risk for skin infection and a decline in health and wellbeing. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet) the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), left hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff washed their hands with soap and water and wore the appropriate personal protective equipment ([PPE] specialized clothing or equipment that protects the wearer from infectious materials, injury, or the spread of illness) while providing care to one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) who was on contact isolation (direct or indirect contact with a resident and/or his or her environment including person's room or objects in contact with the person, that has an infection) due to a Clostridium difficile colitis ([C diff] inflammation of the colon caused by a bacteria) infection. These deficient practices resulted in facility staff not following infection prevention protocols and had the potential to spread infection amongst residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to: a.Notify the physician when Resident 1 had episodes of loose watery stool in a timely manner. b.Administer insulin ( medication used to treat high blood sugar) as ordered by the physician on 7/21/2024 at 12:00 p.m. dose. c.Notify the physician when Resident 1's blood sugar remained high despite administration of insulin. These failures had the potential for Resident 1 to have elevated blood sugar level that can lead to worsening of his condition. Resident 1 was transferred to general acute care hospital (GACH) for management of high blood sugar and infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness of one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (damage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to observe infection prevention and control measures by failing to: a. Conduct fit testing (test to ensure they are wearing the proper size respirator to seal and prevent particles, that may cause infection, from entering the respiratory system) for a N95 mask (filtering facepiece respirator) on six of 10 staff members. b. Handle soiled linens in a safe and sanitary way by staff swinging the plastic linen bag back and forth towards the body before disposing it in a barrel outside the facility. These deficient practices had the potential to place residents at risk for the spread of infection and result in cross contamination (physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object, or place to another). Findings: a. During a concurrent interview and record review with Infection Preventionist Nurse (IPN) reviewed N95 Mask Fit Test Log. IPN confirmed six staff members were not up to date with their N95 mask fit test (method of finding a right respirator that can provide a tight seal and protect…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement their antibiotic stewardship program (measures used by the facility to ensure antibiotics [drug to treat infection] are used only when necessary and appropriate) on one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to monitor and address antibiotic (a substance used to kill bacteria and to treat infection) use. This failure had the potential for the resident to receive an inappropriate antibiotic and develop clostridium difficile infection ([C diff] highly contagious bacterial infection of the colon and caused symptoms such as diarrhea, and stomach pain). Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (partial weakness of the right side of the body after a stroke), , diabetes mellitus( high blood sugar), congestive heart failure( condition that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain infection control procedures when Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 3 and CNA 1 failed to perform hand hygiene in between resident ' s care and prior to entering and exiting resident room. This deficient practice had the potential to result in cross contamination (physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object, or place to another) and spread of diseases and infection to the facility staff, residents, and visitors. Findings: During an observation on 6/21/2024 at 9:32 a.m., CNA 3 was observed not performing hand hygiene between resident care or when entering and exiting a resident room. During an interview on 6/21/2024 at 9:42 a.m., CNA 3 stated, she was rushing so she did not perform hand hygiene while providing resident care. CNA 3 stated she should have performed hand hygiene to prevent the spread of infection. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/21/2024 at 10:05 a.m., CNA 1 was observed entering and exiting a resident ' s room without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). The facility failed to: a. Inform Resident 1's physician regarding the removal of Resident 1's Peripherally inserted central catheter ([PICC] thin, soft tube inserted into the resident's vein for long term medication, nutrition, and blood draws) line. b. Monitor and assess the PICC line site after removal. This deficient practice placed Resident 1 at risk for bleeding and infection after the removal of the PICC line. Findings During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis of osteomyelitis (swelling of bone tissue that is usually the result of an infection) of the vertebra (spine). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS]- a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 4/10/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 1's cognition (the mental action or process of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of 36 sampled residents (Resident 145), were not left with feces (solid waste passed out of the body of a human or animal) on her clothing and stomach (belly) upon returned to the facility from general acute care hospital (GACH). This failure resulted in Resident 145 feeling of helplessness, neglect, and frustration. Findings: During a review of Resident 145's admission Record, indicated Resident 145 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (chronic condition that affects how the body process sugar), hemiplegia (loss of the ability to move that affects only one side of your body), and cerebral infarction (damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area). During a review of Resident 145's History and Physical (H&P), dated 1/19/24, indicated, Resident 145 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 145's Minimum Data Set [(MDS),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide needed care and services for three of eight (8) sampled residents (Resident 141, 155 and Resident 164) by failing to: 1.Answer the call light for 30 minutes to three hours for Resident 141 when she called for help and failing to change incontinence brief ( diaper) after being soiled wet withy urine for hours in the bed. 2.Failing to provide privacy and towel to cover Resident 141 after showering. 3.Failing to change Resident 155 after the suprapubic catheter (a hollow flexible tube that is used to drain urine from the bladder through a cut in the abdomen) leaked urine on Resident 155 gown for hours. These failures had the potential risk for Resident 141 and 155 to develop pressure ulcers ( an injury that breaks down the skin and underlying tissue), urinary tract infection (infection in any part of the urinary system) , generalized itching and burning all over her body and the potential for feelings of depression, anger and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensed nurses failed to ensure pharmaceutical services included procedures to ensure accurate dispensing, administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of two of seven sampled residents (Resident 83 and 480) by failing to: 1.Ensure a licensed nurse administer the three Lidocaine 4% patches (medication used to help relieve pain) to the left hip, left knee and right knee on 2/6/2024 to Resident 83. This failure had the potential to result in ineffectively managing Resident 83's chronic pain. 2.Ensure three Lidocaine 4% patches were not left on Resident 83's bedside table unattended by a licensed nurse. This failure had the potential for other staff, visitors, or residents to access prescription medications at any time 3.Ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 7 and CNA 8 did not administer the Lidocaine patches (a prescription medication) to Resident 83 outside their scope of practice(the activities that an individual health care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner to prevent growth of microorganisms (an organism that can be seen only through a microscope) that could cause food borne illness (food poisoning: any illness resulting from the food spoilage of contaminated food, pathogenic bacteria, viruses, or parasites that contaminate food, as well as toxins) by failure to: 1. Ensure foods stored in kitchen reach in refrigerator were dated, labeled, and discarded before the used by date (expiration dates). This failure had the potential to affect residents and result in pathogen (germ) exposure and placed residents at risk for developing foodborne illness (food poisoning) with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever and can lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/6/2024 at 8:15 a.m. with the dietary aid (DA), observed food items inside the reach in refrigerator not labelled with open date. DA stated when a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 3) was treated with respect and dignity when Resident 3's roommate's visitor failed to knock and request permission before entering Resident 3's room during personal care. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 3's sense of self-worth and self-esteem and unnecessarily exposed resident to others. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including polyneuropathy (multiple peripheral nerves become damaged), morbid obesity (the weight is more than 80 to 100 pounds above their ideal body weight), diabetes mellitus (a disorder in which the amount of sugar in the blood is elevated), low back pain, chronic pain syndrome (pain that lasts for over three months) and osteoporosis (a disease in which bones become fragile and more likely to break (fracture). During a review of Resident 3's History and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide foot care for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 74). This failure resulted in Resident 74's toenail untrimmed and long with yellow substance under the toenails and had the potential to cause infection of the toenail and degrade self-esteem. Findings: During a review of Resident 74's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis) and hemiparesis (one-sided muscle weakness) following cerebral infarction (a disease in a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain which may cause parts of the brain to die off), heart failure (a condition when your heart does not pump enough blood for your body's needs), and atrial fibrillation (irregular, often rapid heart rhythm). During a review of Resident 74's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 1/22/2024, the MDS indicated, Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Perform weekly weights, nutritional re-assessment and provide revised interventions for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 155) when Resident 155 lost 20.2 pounds from April 2023 to July 2023. This failure placed Resident 155 at risk for continued weight loss, and potential for malnutrition (lack of proper nutrition, caused by not having enough to eat, not eating enough). 2. Provide breakfast tray and assistance during mealtime on 2/6/2024. This failure resulted in Resident 155 not having a breakfast meal tray on 2/6/2024 and felt neglected by facility staff and had the potential for depression (a common and serious medical illness that negatively affects how you feel, the way you think and how you act). Findings: During a review of Resident 155's admission Record indicated Resident 155 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia (a form of paralysis that affects all four limbs, plus the torso),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to manage residents' pain for two of two sampled residents (Resident 110 and 460) by: 1.Failure to assess for pain prior to providing personal care. This failure resulted in Resident 110 suffer with pain while receiving personal care with facility staff. 2. Failure to follow physician order when Resident 460 was given acetaminophen with a pain scale (way to rate or measure resident pain) level of five (1-4 mild pain, 5-7 moderate pain) on 2/6/2024 and seven on 2/8/2024. This failure had the potential to not alleviate the pain for Resident 460. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 110's admission Record, indicated Resident 110 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually, the ability to carry out simple task) , diabetes mellitus (a condition in which the body fails to metabolize (process) glucose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1.Ensure that a licensed nurse administer the three Lidocaine 4% patches (medication used to help relieve pain) to the left hip, left knee and right knee on 2/6/2024 to one of seven sampled residents (Resident 83) and not left on Resident 83's bedside unattended. This failure had the potential to result in ineffectively managing Resident 83's chronic pain and had the potential for other staff, visitors ,or residents to access prescription medications at any time. Findings: During an observation on 2/6/2024 at 1:25 p.m. at Resident 83's bedside, observed three (3) lidocaine patches were left on Resident 83's bedside table by the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4. During a review of Resident 83's admission Record indicated Resident 83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic pain syndrome (long term pain), polyneuropathy (simultaneous malfunction of many peripheral nerves throughout the body) and chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food served was palatable (food and drink pleasant to taste) and/or at the proper temperature for one of five sampled residents (Residents 71). This failure had the potential for Resident 71 to feel upset, affect her wellbeing, and poor meal intake that can lead to weight loss. Findings: During a review of Resident 71's admission Record indicated Resident 71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness of one side of the body), diabetes mellitus (insufficient insulin (hormone that helps regulate blood sugar), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and chronic kidney disease (progressive loss of kidney function over a period of time). During a review of Resident 71's the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene (hand washing using soap and water, and cleaning hands with waterless or alcohol-based hand sanitizers) during medication administration for one of three sampled resident (Resident 168). This failure placed Resident 168 at risk for spread of infection between residents and staff had a potential to result in cross contamination (physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object, or place to another). Findings: During a review of Resident 168's admission Record, indicated Resident 168 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 168's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care screening tool, dated 11/15/2023, the MDS indicated, Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement antibiotic stewardship program (measures used by the facility to ensure antibiotics [drug to treat infection] are used only when necessary and appropriate) for one of 36 sampled residents (Resident 148), by prescribing an antibiotic without meeting the criteria of their protocol (checklist or guide to initiate antibiotic) for urinary tract infection ([UTI] infection in any part of the urinary system). This failure had the potential to put Resident 148 at risk for antibiotic resistance (not effective to treat infection) and inappropriate use of antibiotic. Findings: During a review of Resident 148's admission Record, indicated Resident 148 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition in which the body fails to metabolize (process) glucose (sugar) correctly) and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 148's History and Physical (H&P), dated 7/28/23, indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the facility failed to provide timely incontinence (having little or no control over urination or defecation) care (assistance in cleaning up a resident after toileting in a brief [adult diaper]) to Resident 1. Resident 1 was left to sit in a soiled, wet adult brief for at least an hour. (Cross referenced to F690) This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 feeling uncomfortable, frustrated, fearful of getting a pressure sore (injuries to the skin and underlying tissue due to prolonged pressure and exposure to moisture) and deterred Resident 1 from eating her lunch at mealtime. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cellulitis (infection of the skin) of left lower limb, diabetes mellitus (disease of too much sugar in the bloodstream),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1 ) who was enrolled in the facility ' s bowel training program and assessed to be frequently incontinent (little or no control over urincation and/or bowel movements) of bowel and bladder, received the care and services to prevent urinary tract infections and maintain as much normal bladder and bowel function as possible. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure the nursing staff assisted Resident 1 timely after toileting in her incontinence briefs( adult diaper) (cross referenced to F550) 2. Ensure Resident 1 was involved in her care planning process involving bladder management which included the possibility of using a bedside commode for urination. 3. Provide Resident 1 the opportunity to participate in the facility toileting program and or bladder management retraining program. These failures resulted in 1.Resident 1 being left to sit in a wet soiled brief which led to Resident 1 to have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review facility failed to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN) 1 doffed (removed) personal protective equipment (PPE - equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards that cause serious workplace injuries and illnesses) after exiting resident's rooms of COVID 19 positive resident, and perform hand hygiene This failure had the potential of cross contamination and spread of infection with other residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: During an observation on 11/21/23 at 12:34 pm, with LVN 1, observed exiting one of residents' rooms of COVID 19 positive resident with face shield and mask and doffed outside the resident room. LVN 1 did not do hand hygiene after taking care of COVID-19 positive resident in the room. During an interview on 11/21/23 at 12:42 p.m., with infection preventionist (IP), stated staff in all areas of the facility must wear N95, and anyone assigned to the COVID 19 positive area must don PPEs before entering resident rooms and doff inside resident and wash hands before coming out of the resident room. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistant 3 (CNA 3) documented Activities of Daily Living (ADL) task provided on 9/12/2023 at 7:00 am to 3:00 p.m. for one of two (Resident 1) residents sampled. The deficient practice resulted in inaccurate depiction of care rendered and received by the residents. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (face sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted at the facility on 8/26/2023 with a diagnosis that included generalized muscle weakness, cerebral infraction (a condition that occurs when the blood supply in the brain is interrupted or reduced, preventing the brain tissue from getting oxygen) without residual effects and history of falling. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized health screening assessment tool, dated 9/2/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 1 was able to verbalize her needs and make decisions that were reasonable and consistent. The MDS indicated the resident needed extensive assistance with personal hygiene and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement infection control practices to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to: 1. ensure visitors and contractors including paramedics (emergency medical technician) wore N95 mask (a face mask that covers the wearer's nose and mouth to achieve a very close facial fit that filters particles from the air) during a Covid- 19 (a potentially severe respiratory illness caused by a coronavirus and characterized by fever, coughing, and shortness of breath [SOB]) outbreak (occurrence of cases of disease that is more than expected) in the facility started on 8/8/2023, 2. ensure Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA 2) doff (remove) gown and gloves that she wore inside the room of Resident 1, Resident 2 and Resident 3 (COVID 19 positive residents) prior to exiting residents' room and walking in the hallway of the resident care areas. 3. ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) perform…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Medical Doctor (MD) was notified when one of three sampled residents (Resident 8) had a change of condition (COC) of low blood pressure, responsive only to pain stimuli and responsible party refusal to send Resident 8 to general acute care hospital (GACH) on [DATE]. This failure resulted in delay in diagnosis, care, treatment, and transfer of Resident 8 to a general acute care hospital (GACH). Findings: During a record review of Resident 8's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), asthma (a condition in which your airways narrow and swell and may produce extra mucus), and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a record review of Resident 8's History and Physical (H&P), the H&P indicated Resident 8 was not able to express needs or communicate, to follow commands, or talk in full…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-15 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate no more than four residents, by failing to ensure rooms provide at least 80 square feet ([sq. ft.] unit of measurement) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms. The insufficient space could lead to inadequate nursing care to the residents. This failure had the potential to decrease the resident's privacy, quality of care and quality of life. Findings: During a review of the facility's Client Accommodations Analysis Form (CAAF) completed by the facility on 02/15/25, the facility had 83 rooms that measured less than 80 sq. ft. per resident in multi-bedrooms. The CAAF indicated rooms: 105, 107, 109 , 111,113,115,117,119,121,123,125,127,201,202, 203,205,206, 207, 208, 209, 210,211,212,214,216,218, 220, 301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309,310,311, 312,401,402,403,404,405,407,408,409,410,411,412,413,414,415,416,417,418, 419,421,501,502,503,504,505,506,507,508,509,510,511,512,513,514,515,516,517,518,519, 520, 521, 522, 523, 525, and 527 are less than 80 square feet to accommodate residents in each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 70 of 96 resident rooms met the requirements of 80 square feet ([sq. ft.] a unit of area measurement) per residents in multi-bed resident rooms. This failure had the potential to result in inadequate space to provide privacy, space during daily care and access during an emergency. Findings: During a review of the facility's Client Accommodations Analysis form, provided by the facility on 2/6/2024, the facility had 83 rooms that measured less than 80 sq. ft. per resident in multi-bedrooms. The resident rooms were as followed: 105, 107, 109, 111, 113, 115, 117, 119, 121, 123, 125, 127, 201, 202, 203, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 214, 216, 218, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 407,408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 421, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 519, 520, 521, 522, 523, 525, and 527 had three or more beds in each room and the rooms measured less than 80 sq. ft per resident. During an observation throughout the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$214,020 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-09-10
- $61,770 — penalty dated 2025-06-06
- $25,571 — penalty dated 2025-05-09
- $72,173 — penalty dated 2025-02-15
- $37,161 — penalty dated 2024-10-29
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-07-22 for 9 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-18 for 18 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAMILY HEALTH & HOUSING FOUNDATION | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 03/01/2001 |
| BAVILSKI, KEREN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/18/2021 |
| HOFFMAN, ASHER | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/25/2019 |
| MARK, ARI | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/13/2012 |
| PLATT, JOSHUA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/13/2012 |
| QUALITY HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2001 |
| REHAB ALLIANCE | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| ABAGAT, CHRISTIAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/26/2024 |
| ADALLA, LIBERTY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/03/2024 |
| BOYCE, SURENA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/17/2012 |
| BRODSKY, MAXIM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2021 |
| BUCHMAN, AVI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2017 |
| BUCHMAN, CARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2001 |
| BUCHMAN, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2017 |
| BUCHMAN, MINDY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2017 |
| CLEMONS, GINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2001 |
| CONDE, ELIZABETH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/03/2024 |
| DE CASTRO, MILDRED | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/29/2024 |
| EL SAYAD, NABIL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2010 |
| ESTRADA, EDGARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/22/2024 |
| GAN-EL, DAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/16/2007 |
| LEWIS, JACKLIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2017 |
| LINGHU, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/06/2021 |
| LYONS, BEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/23/2020 |
| MILLER, KATHLEEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/26/2021 |
| NELSON, CARL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2020 |
| REYES, AUDRIANA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/02/2023 |
| RICO, JOHNNY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/24/2013 |
| WILLIAMS, DRENAKA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/14/2023 |
| WILLIAMS, ELIZABETH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/16/2014 |
| BUCHMAN, LINDA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 74 rows in the source record cover these 31 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $428K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056488. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.