Masonic Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 125 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 27.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 128 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 89.4 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.38 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.49 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.01 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-06-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Cross Reference F610Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment which was free from sexual abuse for Resident 1 when Resident 2 placed his hand under Resident 1's blouse.This had the potential to negatively impact Resident 1 emotionally and psychologically. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, SNF- Chapter 11- Resident Behavior & Facility Practices 001 Elder Abuse Prevention, Identification, Investigation & Reporting), the P&P indicated, Purpose: To establish an environment that is homelike as possible and creates a culture and environment that treat each resident with respect and dignity, uploading their self-worth and individuality.Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation.Definitions:. Sexual Abuse includes, but is not limited to, sexual harassment, sexual coercion, or sexual assault, to include non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. (SNF…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Cross Reference F600Based on interview, record review, and facility policy and procedure (P&P) review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate the sexual abuse allegation as per facility's P&P for Resident 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 witnessed Resident 2 place his hand inside Resident 1's blouse.This had the potential to place other vulnerable residents at increased risk of abuse. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, (SNF-Chapter 11- Resident Behavior and Facility Practices 001 Elder Abuse Prevention, Identification, Investigation and Reporting, the P&P indicated, .Policy statement: .Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff or other agencies serving the resident .F. Investigation.1. The facility will conduct an investigation of any alleged abuse/neglect or misappropriation of resident property in accordance with state law.13. The Administrator shall report…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure storage of food under sanitary conditions when the following food items in the walk-in-refrigerator were not dated and labeled with received, open and use-by dates : One open package of hot dog Six opened containers of salad cream One bowl of peeled mandarin oranges Ice machine cover and surface areas were dusty; inside panel area with brownish, rusty discoloration, and dusty grayish discolored water tubing sleeves. These deficient practices had the potential to cause food borne illness. Findings: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 2/3/25 at 9:20 a.m. with Director of Dining Services (DD) and Registered Dietician (RD), the following food items in the walk-in refrigerator were not labeled with use-by date: opened package of hot dog, six opened containers of salad cream and one bowl of peeled mandarin oranges. During an interview on 2/4/25 at 8:55 a.m. with [NAME] (CK 1), CK 1 stated she was trained to label and date food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation , interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 71 sampled residents' call lights were within easy reach (Residents 3,59 and 64). This failure had the potential for the residents' inability to use the call light when in need of assistance. Findings: 1. During an initial tour of the facility on 2/6/25 at 10:09 a.m., in Resident 3's room, the resident was observed to be sitting in bed, alert and was able to answer questions. The call light was observed to be beyond the resident's reach as it was hanging on the wall beside the resident's bed. Resident 3 stated he did not know where his call light was, and stated he needed his call light to request for assistance occasionally. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 3, it indicated that Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included muscle weakness and abnormalities of gait and mobility. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/6/25 at 10:16 a.m., with Licensed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow skin and wound care policy and procedure when Resident 69 's pressure ulcer dressing was not appropriately labeled with last change date and the treatment nurse's initials. This failure has the potential to result in missed monitoring and treatment, leading to delayed wound healing, increased wound size, and infections. Findings: During a review of Resident 69's Detailed Summary printed on 2/5/25, it indicated Resident 69 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including pneumonia (an infection of one or both of the lungs caused by bacteria, viruses, or fungi), pressure ulcer (refers to localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device) of the left buttock (stage 2), Type 1 diabetes (a long-term (chronic) disease in which the body cannot regulate the amount of sugar in the blood), and chronic kidney disease. During a record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage practices when expired medications in an emergency drug kit (a collection of medications used to treat medical emergencies) were available for use. This failure had the potential to result in residents receiving expired and ineffective medications. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/3/25, at 11:04 AM, with Licensed Registered Nurse (RN2), in medication room on the third floor, several emergency drug kits were audited and observed one of them had an expiration date of 11/2024. RN2 confirmed that it had been expired since 11/2024. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/3/25, at 11:20 AM, with the Pharmacy Manager (PM), in the medication room, the PM stated the emergency drug kit was expired on 11/2024, and she would have it replaced today. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Storage In The Facility undated, the P&P indicated, Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse storage area was maintained in a sanitary condition when the dumpster's surrounding area was littered with trash and used gloves. This failure had the potential of harborage and feeding of pest. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/5/25 at 9:05 a.m. with Maintenance Staff (MS) and Registered Dietician (RD) the dumpster's surrounding area located behind the kitchen building had stagnant water and littered with trash and used gloves. MS stated littering around the dumpster with trash and used gloves was not an acceptable practice. During an interview on 2/5/25 at 11:13 a.m. with Administrator (Admin), Facility Manager (FM), MS, RD, and Director of Dining Services (DD), dumpster sanitation findings were reviewed. FM stated the dumpster area was scheduled for cleaning weekly and recently there had been a lot of staff who called off work due to illness. FM stated that he was sorry surveyor found the dumpster area like that. During a review of the facility's policy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable homelike environment when the hand sanitizer dispenser in one of ten resident bedrooms was non-operational for four consecutive days. This failure resulted in an unsanitary living condition and the potential for the spread of infection between residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: During a review of Resident 45's Detailed Summary, printed 2/05/25, it indicated Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including right lower leg open wound, Proteus mirabilis infection (a bacteria that can cause various infections, primarily in the urinary tract), Staphylococcus aureus infection (a bacteria cause skin infection. This can produce boils, blisters, and redness on your skin), chronic venous hypertension (a condition where the veins in the legs become enlarged and weakened, leading to increased pressure in the veins) with ulcer and inflammation of right lower extremity (leg), and latent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of care when; Facility did not address Resident 1's continued weight loss and bilateral buttock redness on comprehensive care plan with appropriate interventions. Facility did not notify Resident 1's physician and representatives of continued weight loss. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 1 to not received appropriate care and services to meet care needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Interdisciplinary Notes (IDT), dated 7/25/24, the IDT indicated, Resident 1 was sent to emergency room (ER) due to persistent nausea, vomiting and significant weight loss. During a review of Resident 1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - Resident assessment and care guide tool), dated 7/10/24, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had no weight loss. MDS indicated Resident 1 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. MDS indicated Resident 1 had one unhealed pressure ulcer (injury to skin and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-07-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to provide palatable food when food was served bland (lacking flavor). This failure had the potential to put residents to consume less food resulting in consumption of less calories and nutrients provided by the planned menu. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 11 with her daughter on 7/10/23 at 11:30 AM, Resident 11 was in lying in bed, alert, Resident 11 was asked if she liked her meal, Resident 11 shook her head and stated, no taste. Resident 11's daughter stated, she also tried to taste resident's pureed food and tasted bland. During a food preparation observation with Registered Dietitian 3 (RD3) on 7/12/23 at 9:40 AM, Dietary staff 1 (DS1) was observed preparing Roast beef mechanical/ pureed food. DS 1 was observed chopping the non-measured amount of roast beef into small pieces and put it into a blender to puree the meat, DS1 then proceeded to add a pitcher amount of water in the blender and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 41 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA