Villa Mesa Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 97 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 27.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 97 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 69% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 103.6 residents a day — about 105% occupied, or roughly -5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-01-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and monitoring were maintained for two of two sampled residents (Resident 23 and 4) reviewed for pressure ulcers (injury to skin and underlying tissues that develop because of prolonged pressure, shear (skin tissues slide in opposite directions when sticks to a surface), or friction) when: 1. For Resident 23, there was no documented evidence of wound treatments for Left Iliac Crest (thick, curved bony ridge at the very top of the hip bone), PI (Pressure Injury), change in condition, physician orders for January 7, 2026 through January 16, 2026, IDT meeting (Interdisciplinary Team meeting - a meeting where different professionals come together to discuss a patient's care) and care plan, to address Resident 23's unstageable (when the base of the wound is covered by a layer of dead tissue and it is not possible to determine the stage (classifying wounds)) PI prior to January 21, 2026.2. Resident 4's moisture associated skin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 61) was provided with a dignified experience when the Infection Preventionist (IP) nurse was standing while assisting Resident 61 to eat.This failure has the potential to cause Resident 61 to feel disrespected and negatively affect their psychosocial well-being and individuality.During a review of Resident 61's admission Record (clinical record with demographic information), the admission Record indicated, Resident 61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and dementia (impaired memory, judgment, and ability to understand or communicate needs.)During an observation on January 20, 2026, at 12:24 PM, in the dining area, the facility's Infection Preventionist (IP) nurse assisted Resident 61 with lunch. IP nurse was standing while Resident 61 was seated in a wheelchair at a dining…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS- a computerized assessment instrument) for one resident (Resident 92) reviewed for history of falls.This failure had the potential to cause inaccuracy in identifying Resident 92's care and support needs.During a review of Resident 92's clinical record, the admission Record (contains demographic and clinical data), the admission Record indicated Resident 92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included generalized (overall body) muscle weakness, Dementia (noticeable, worsening loss of brain function, including memory, thinking, language, and judgment, that goes beyond normal aging), and adult failure to thrive (downward spiral of health and ability).During a review of Resident 92's MDS Quarterly Assessment (an assessment for a resident that must be completed every 92 days following the previous assessment), dated January 5, 2026, the MDS Quarterly Assessment under Section J…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan (a summary of a resident's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments) addressing identified medical needs for two of two sampled residents (Residents 11 and 14), when:1. Resident 11's care plan for intravenous (IV) therapy (a method of giving fluids or medications directly into a vein), initiated on January 12, 2026, did not address monitoring, nursing interventions, or measurable goals.2. Resident 14, admitted on hospice services (specialized care that provides physical comfort and emotional, social and spiritual support for people nearing the end of life) since June 10, 2025, did not have a comprehensive care plan addressing hospice service, including goals of care, palliative interventions, or coordination of services.These failures had the potential to result in inadequate planning, monitoring, and coordination of care, placing residents at risk for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nutritional status was monitored for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 47) reviewed for weight loss, when Resident 47's weight loss was not addressed from November 6, 2025, through January 19, 2026.This failure had the potential to result in delayed treatment, increased risk for unmet nutritional needs, further weight loss, decline in function status, and compromised overall health and well-being.During a review of Resident 47's admission Record (clinical record with demographic information), the admission Record indicated Resident 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction with right - sided hemiplegia (a stroke that caused weakness on the right side of the body), epilepsy (convulsions) and metabolic encephalopathy (a condition affecting brain function that causes confusion, impaired thinking, and reduced ability to safety care for oneself).During a review of Resident 47's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its intravenous (IV) therapy (a method of giving fluids or medications directly into a vein through a small tube) policy and procedures was followed for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 61) when Resident 61's IV dressing (the bandage place over the IV site to protect it) on the right arm was not labeled to indicate the date when it was changed.This failure prevents staff from properly monitoring the IV site, increasing the risk of infection and infiltration (where fluid leaks into the surrounding tissue causing pain or damage).During a review of Resident 61's admission Record (clinical record with demographic information), the admission Record indicated, Resident 61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and dementia (impaired memory, judgment, and ability to understand or communicate needs).During an observation on January 20, 2026, at 11:21 AM, in Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate records of controlled medications (narcotic medications that are controlled by the government because it may be abused or cause addiction) were maintained in accordance with their own policy and procedure for one of three Medication Carts (Medication Cart B).This failure had the potential to result in inaccurate count of narcotic drugs and drug diversion (illegal distribution of controlled drugs for any illicit use) of controlled medications by the staff in a highly vulnerable population of 93 residents.During a concurrent observation, interview, and record review, on January 1, 2026, at 7:30 AM with a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 3), at Medication Cart B, Medication Cart B's 8-hour Controlled Drugs-Count Record (8 HR CDCR- mandatory, real-time log tracking high-risk medication inventory [Schedules II-V] to prevent theft or misuse), dated January 1, 2026, through January 22, 2026, was reviewed. LVN 3 stated two licensed nurses verify the log during shift change. The 8 HR CDCR indicated there…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain effective infection prevention and control practices (steps used to prevent the spread of germs, including proper cleaning, storage, and handling of medical equipment) for three of seven sampled residents (Residents 4, 14, and 68) when:1. For Resident 4, the urinary catheter bag (a medical bag used for collection of urine) was resting on the floor, on January 20, 2026.2. For Resident 14, an oxygen tubing (a flexible plastic tube to deliver oxygen from the oxygen concentrator to the resident) was hanging from underneath the bed and touching the floor.3. For Resident 68, a breathing treatment face mask (a medical device that covers the nose and mouth to deliver medication directly to the airways and lungs) was on top of the nightstand, uncovered and unlabeled, while not in use.These failures had the potential to result in cross contamination (when germs are spread from one person, surface, or object to another, making it easier…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate record of Norco (a controlled medication that combines two types of drugs, acetaminophen and hydrocodone, for pain management) for one of five sample residents (Resident 4) when a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN1) administered Norco to Resident 4 and failed to document. This failure had the potential in delaying the recognition of possible diversion of a control medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 Face Sheet (contain resident demographic), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included Hemiparesis (one-sided muscle weakness), Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Hypertensive (high blood pressure) heart disease. A review of Resident 4's Orders, dated November 30, 2024, indicated, Norco 5-325 milligram (mg-unit dosing medication, a combination of 325 mg of acetaminophen and 5 mg of hydrocodone) was ordered to be given as needed for moderate pain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to its safety and supervision of resident ' s policy when one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was not adequately supervised following two fall incidents within 48-hour period. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a pelvic fracture during the latest fall incident. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s Progress Notes, with a date range from 9/28/2024 to 10/29/2024. The progress note indicated, Resident 1 had a witnessed fall incident on October 7, 2024, at 8:20 a.m. which occurred in the hallway. Further review of the records indicated that Resident 1 had another fall which is classified as unwitnessed (without being seen by a care professional or a resident who can accurately described the event) on October 9, 2024, at 4:30 a.m., also occurring in the hallway. During an observation on 10/28/2024, at 12:45 p.m., it was noted that the resident ' s room, which is 110 during the two recent fall incidents. This…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a preadmission screening and resident review (PAASRR) screening was completed prior to admission to the facility for 3 (Residents #22, #42, and #86) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for PASARR screening. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Pre-admission Screening Resident Review Level I, revised10/2018, specified, Policy: The State of California has adopted a process to submit Pre-admission Screening Resident Review electronically. All facilities must complete the [PASARR] by midnight of the date of admission. The policy revealed IX. The BOM [Business Office Manager] will review the status of [PASARR] daily before Stand-Up Meeting to review if new admissions' [PASARR] have been completed. X. The BOM will report during Stand-Up Meeting the status of the [PASARR(s)]. The policy indicated, XII. The admission Coordinator/Case Manager will ensure that the [PASARR] is part of the admission mini packet. XIII. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $663K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA