No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Care Center On Hazeltine, LLC

6835 Hazeltine Ave., Van Nuys, CA 91405 · For profit - Partnership · 58 certified beds · (818) 997-1841 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (818) 997-1841 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Nov 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations$72,521 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $72,521 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-07)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6750 Hazeltine Ave
Pharmacy
14103 Victory Blvd Ste 6 · (818) 616-4555 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6841 Lennox Ave · (818) 901-7447 · Call to confirm hours
Park
14101 Sherman Way · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
IFA Elohim<0.1 mi
14041 Vanowen St · (818) 300-2239

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.5%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.5%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms28.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.6%0.4%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.7%1.6%3.3%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.9%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.0%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%4.3%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.0%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.2%12.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.5%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.5%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.542.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.271.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

17.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 101 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

17.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
74.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.54U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.23hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.26hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 74.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 85 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF17.2%CMS range 11.1–24.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 8.6–16.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge74.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge65.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge70.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 5.0–14.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.381.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.46
RN hours/ resident / day
1.29
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.49
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.24
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
23.7%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 58 beds and averages 48.3 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.24 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.33 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-18)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse (deliberately aggressive or violent behavior with the intention to cause harm by one resident towards another) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 33) when on 11/3/2024 at 7:00 a.m., Resident 47 (roommate) threw a cup at Resident 33 hitting Resident 33's forehead. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 33 being subjected to physical abuse by Resident 47 while under the care of the facility. Resident 33 sustained a laceration (a deep cut or tear in the skin) on the forehead and required transfer to General Acute Care Hospital 1 (GACH 1). Resident 1 received sutures (a stitch or a row of stitches holding together the edges of a wound). Based on the Reasonable Person Concept (the usual behavior of an average person under the same circumstances), due to Resident 33's severely impaired cognition (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse (deliberately aggressive or violent behavior with the intention to cause harm) for two of five sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when on 3/10/2024 Certified Nurse Assistant 2 (CNA 2) witnessed Resident 2 punch Resident 1 in the stomach area; and then Resident 1 punch Resident 2's right side of the face. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 and Resident 2 being subjected to physical abuse while under the care of the facility. Resident 2 sustained skin abrasions (when the surface layers of the skin have been broken) to the right side of the forehead (the part of the face above the eyes), the nose bridge (upper part of the nose) and right side of the nose crease (the part of the nose directly under the bridge) that needed first aid (initial assistance and care given to a resident who has been injured) and daily wound treatments. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Reconcile (the process of comparing transactions and activity to supporting documentation) two (2) medication emergency kits ([eKIT] - storage container for emergency use medications) containing Controlled Substances ([CS]- medications which have a potential for abuse and may also lead to physical or psychological dependence, also known as Controlled Medications) for 12/2025, in one (1) of one (1) inspected Medication Rooms (Medication room [ROOM NUMBER].) 2. Reconcile one (1) medication eKIT containing CSs for 12/2025, in one (1) of two (2) inspected Medication Carts (Medication Cart 1.) As a result, control and accountability of CSs and availability of medications did not follow state and federal regulations and facility policy and procedures. These deficient practices increased the opportunity for CS diversion (the transfer of a controlled medication or other medication from a lawful to an unlawful channel of distribution or use,)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and proper food handling practices by failing to: 1. Ensure bins containing potatoes and onions were labeled with a date of when they were received. 2. Ensure one sweet and sour sauce container was clean with no residue left outside of the container. 3. Ensure the ice machine water filter was changed according to its replace date and according to the manufacturer's policy. 4. Ensure the residents' refrigerator temperature log was updated daily for three dates. 5. Ensure chocolate milk and vanilla and chocolate ice cream inside the residents' refrigerator were labeled with name and date. These deficient practices had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to food borne illness (a disease caused by consuming food or drinks that are contaminated by germs or chemicals) in 44 of 46 medically compromised residents who received food and ice from the kitchen. Findings: 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident's representative with information regarding formulating an advance directive (AD- a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions) for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 16).This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 16 and their representative to not be informed of their right to formulate an advance directive and not honor the resident's wishes regarding end-of-life care.Findings: During a review of Resident 16's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 1/30/2025 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder (a mental health condition where you experience excessive, persistent worry, fear, or nervousness that doesn't go away and interferes with daily life) and history of falling. During a review of Resident 16's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 11/4/2025, the MDS indicated the resident`s cognitive skills for daily decision making was intact. The MDS further indicated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician's order by failing to notify a resident's physician regarding a resident having signs and symptoms of bleeding for one of six sampled residents (Resident 2). This deficient practice had the potential to result in worsening symptoms and negatively affect the delivery of care and services to Resident 2.Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 8/14/2025 with diagnoses including ventricular fibrillation (life-threatening heart rhythm), myocardial infarction (heart attack-when blood flow to a part of the heart muscle gets blocked), and end stage renal disease (ESRD-a medical condition in which a person's kidneys [organ in the body that filters waste and excess fluid from the blood] stop functioning on a permanent basis). During review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 11/21/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 2 had intact cognition (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (advocates for residents of nursing homes, board and care homes, and assisted living facilities) of a resident's discharge from the facility for one of three sampled residents (Resident 54). This deficient practice had the potential for the ombudsman to not be aware of any potential issues from the discharge.Findings:During a review of Resident 54's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 54 on 9/12/2025 with diagnoses including difficulty walking, nicotine dependence (a chronic, compulsive need for nicotine [found in tobacco, cigarettes]), and anxiety disorder (a mental health condition where you experience excessive, persistent worry, fear, or nervousness that doesn't go away and interferes with daily life).During a review of Resident 54's History and Physical (H&P) dated 9/13/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 54 did have the capacity to make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 54's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's indwelling urinary catheter (a tube that is inserted into the bladder, allowing urine to drain) tubing was not coiled and allowed the contents to flow freely into the urinary catheter bag (container that connects to a urinary catheter and collects urine) for one of one sampled resident's (Resident 9).This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 9 to develop a urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in the urinary system). Findings: During a review of Resident 9's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 9 on 10/20/2025 with diagnoses including urinary tract infections, neuromuscular disfunction of the bladder (a condition where the nerves that control the bladder are damaged, preventing it from emptying properly), and chronic kidney disease (a long-term condition where the kidneys are damaged and gradually lose their ability to filter blood properly). During a review of Resident 9's History and Physical (H&P) dated 11/3/2025, the H&P…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store medications in accordance with manufacturer specifications, professional principles and facility policy and procedures, in one (1) of two (2) inspected medication carts (Medication Cart 1) by failing to ensure eye drops were stored separately from orally administered medications.This deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk of infections for residents in the facility and to receive medications in the wrong route (internal versus external routes) possibly leading to adverse health consequences. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/16/2025 at 10:18 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, in Medication Cart 1, the following medications were stored in a manner contrary to the facility's P&P:a. One (1) eye drop solution stored with sodium chloride oral tablet, glucosamine oral capsule and oyster shell calcium oral tablets in the same bin of the medication cart.LVN 3 stated that orally administered medications and eye drops should be stored separately in their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's water pitcher was not placed on the floor for one of one sampled resident (Resident 16).This deficient practice had the potential to result in contamination of the drinking water that can lead to waterborne diseases caused by pathogens (bacteria, viruses, parasites) spread through contaminated water, leading to symptoms like diarrhea and vomiting. Findings: During a review of Resident 16's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 1/30/2025 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder (a mental health condition where you experience excessive, persistent worry, fear, or nervousness that doesn't go away and interferes with daily life) and history of falling. During a review of Resident 16's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 11/4/2025, the MDS indicated the resident`s cognitive skills for daily decision making was intact. The MDS further indicated that Resident 16 required partial to moderate assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure titled Abuse Prohibition and Prevention Program, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) was not assigned to Resident 1 after an allegation of emotional abuse was made. This deficient practice resulted to Resident 1 feeling uncomfortable and had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for further abuse that could have resulted in Resident 1 needing additional care or emotional support. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 9/17/2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) with exacerbation (an increase in the severity of the disease) and generalized muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 10/31/2024, the MDS indicated the resident had intact cognition (the mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards by failing to rotate (a method to ensure repeated injections are not administered in the same area) subcutaneous (fatty area beneath the skin) administration sites of insulin (a hormone that lowers blood sugar) for one (Resident 30) of five sampled residents investigated for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice had the potential for adverse effects (undesired harmful effect resulting from a medication) of same site subcutaneous administration of insulin such as lipodystrophy (when fat cells accumulate under the skin from repeated injections in the same place). Findings: During a review of Resident 30's Face Sheet (admission record), the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted the resident on 9/11/2023 with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar). During a review of Resident 's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 9/12/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 30 was cognitively (the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who receive apixaban (a medication that treats and helps prevents blood clots in the heart and blood vessels) were accurately monitored for side effects (an often harmful and unwanted effect) for one of six sampled residents (Resident 13). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 13 experiencing adverse side effects (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have) from the anticoagulant including unusual bruising (a mark on the skin that occurs when small, bleeding from the gums or nose, and having blood in the stool. Findings: During a review of Resident 13's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, epilepsy (a brain disorder that causes seizures [sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbances in the brain which can cause uncontrolled jerking, blank…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs (any drug that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception in excessive dose, excessive duration, without adequate monitoring) for one of six sampled residents (Residents 10) by failing to ensure Resident 10 received the correct dose of duloxetine (medication that is used to treat depression [a persistent feeling of sadness or a lack of interest in outside stimuli]) as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice resulted in an administration of excessive dose of duloxetine to Resident 10 and had the potential to place the resident at risk for significant adverse consequence (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have) from the use of unnecessary psychotropic drug, which could result to impairment (being weakened) or decline (gradually become less) in the resident's mental, physical condition, functional, and psychosocial status. Findings: During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from significant medication error by failing to administer the correct dose of duloxetine (medication used to treat depression [a persistent feeling of sadness or a lack of interest in outside stimuli]) as ordered by the physician for one of three sample residents (Resident 10). This deficient practice resulted in an administration of excessive dose of duloxetine to Resident 10 and had the potential to place the resident at risk for significant adverse consequence (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have) from the use of unnecessary psychotropic drug, which could result to impairment (being weakened) or decline (gradually become less) in the resident's mental, physical condition, functional, and psychosocial status. Cross reference F758 Findings: During a review of Resident 10's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 6/1/2020,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment and food storage practices in the kitchen when: 1. A single sausage patty was observed exposed and unwrapped on top of an open box containing an unsealed bag of the same sausage patties in Freezer 1. 2. An undated bottle of Gatorade belonging to a staff member was stored in Refrigerator 2. 3. Shelves intended to hold clean trays were observed stained, with crumbs and dust. 4. Two plastic bins holding clean utensils were observed with reddish food residue and crumbs and placed on dusty shelves. These deficient practices had the potential to place the facility residents at risk for foodborne illness (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, and other toxins) and to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another). Findings: During an initial kitchen tour on 11/4/2024 at 7:45 a.m., with [NAME] 1, observed an unwrapped sausage patty on top of an open box containing an unsealed bag of the same…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices when Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) did not wash hands between administering medications via gastrostomy tube (also known as a G-Tube, is a flexible that is inserted through the abdominal wall and into the stomach to provide nutrition and fluids) and giving an insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of sugar in the body) injection to Resident 32. This deficient practice had the potential to cause Resident 32 to develop an infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells), colon cancer, and vascular dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities that occurs when the blood supply to the brain is disrupted). During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan (a plan of care that summarizes a resident's health conditions, specific care and services facility staff need to provide a resident to promote healing and prevent a worsening of a condition, and current treatments) to meet the resident`s needs for one of five sampled residents (Resident 14) by failing to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan addressing Resident 14`s problem with communication. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 14 not being able to communicate requests, needs or concerns which could lead to inadequate care of Resident 14. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 5/11/2023, with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) , repeated falls, dysphagia (swallowing difficulties), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 14) was provided a communication device or board (a tool that includes pictures that help residents communicate their healthcare and every-day needs to facility staff) in his preferred language. This deficient practice had the potential to prevent the resident from communicating with the staff and receiving care in a timely manner. Cross reference F656 Findings: During a review of Resident 14's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 5/11/2023, with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) , repeated falls, dysphagia (swallowing difficulties), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest and can interfere with your daily activities of living). During a review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Set (MDS -a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 8/8/2024, the MDS indicated the resident`s cognitive skills…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to discard a medicated ointment belonging to Resident 8 from one of one inspected treatment carts after the resident had been discharged . This deficient practice resulted in the facility staff still being able to access a discharged resident's medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 8's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (CHF-a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). The admission Record indicated Resident 8 was discharged on 10/26/2024. During a review of Resident 8's History and Physical (H&P), dated 7/30/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 8 does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 8's physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the nutritional needs for one of three sampled residents (Resident 12) by failing to provide a fortified diet (a food that has extra nutrients [important substances you get from food that help your body survive and grow] added to it) as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 12's decreased nutritional intake and weight loss. Findings: During a review of Resident 12's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility originally admitted the resident on 8/25/2014, and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including dysphasia (swallowing difficulties), anorexia (an eating disorder that causes people to weigh less than is considered healthy for their age and height), unspecified dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), and schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was an adequate indication for the use of permethrin cream (a medication used to treat scabies [a condition caused by tiny insects called mites] that infest and irritate a person's skin) and ivermectin (a medication that treats infections caused by roundworms, threadworms, and other parasites [organism that lives on or in a host organism and gets its food from or at the expense of its host]) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the use of unnecessary medication and cause adverse side effects (an undesired harmful effect resulting from a medication or other intervention) such as burning, itching, numbness, rash, redness, stinging, swelling of the skin, weakness, uncontrollable shaking of a part of the body, and chest discomfort. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility readmitted Resident 1 on 3/22/2023 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (refers to a group of diseases that cause…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY c. A review of Resident 49's admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included seizures (a burst of uncontrolled electrical activity between brain cells that causes temporary abnormalities in muscle tone or movements, behaviors, sensations or states of awareness), Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), and unspecified dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning). A review of Resident 49's MDS dated [DATE], indicated that Resident 49's cognitive skills for daily decision making was severely impaired. The MDS also indicated that Resident 49 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene. A review of Resident 49's Care Plan titled, ADL: Resident 49 requires assistance in personal hygiene indicated an intervention to assist with maintaining good personal hygiene every shift and as needed. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the attending physician assess and documented in the resident`s medical record the rationale for extending Ativan (medication is used to treat anxiety [(intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations]) for 30 additional days for one of two sampled residents (Resident 47) reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. 2. Provide non-pharmacological interventions (health interventions that are not primarily based on medication) to Resident 11 prior to administering as needed (prn) Ativan on multiple dates for one (Resident 11) of five sampled residents investigated for unnecessary medications. These deficient practices had the potential to result in unnecessary medications and had the potential to result in adverse reaction or impairment in the resident's mental or physical condition. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 47's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 10/20/2023, with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility: 1. Failed to document temperatures for the medication refrigerator. 2. Failed to ensure a bottle of Bismuth Subsalicylate (medication used to treat diarrhea [loose, watery and possibly more-frequent bowel movements]) that was labeled open on 11/17/2020 (approximately three years ago) was discarded. 3. Failed to ensure a bottle of Milk of Magnesia (medication to treat an upset stomach) was labeled with its open date (the date at which a new medication is first opened). These deficient practices had the potential to compromise the therapeutic effectiveness medication. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/17/2023 at 5:53 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1), LVN 1 reviewed the facility's Medication Refrigerator temperature log for 10/2023 and 11/2023. LVN 1 stated that facility staff should document the temperature of the refrigerator at the start and the end of each shift. LVN 1 reviewed the Medication Refrigerator temperature log for 10/2023 and 11/2023 and stated that there was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices by: 1. Failing to ensure one of three sampled staff (Maintenance Assistant [MA]) did not wear gloves while walking in the facility's hallway. 2. Failing to ensure one of three sampled staff (Certified Nursing Assistant 2 [CNA 2]) removed their used gloves prior to exiting a resident room and failing to ensure CNA 2 performed hand hygiene (washing of hands) after removing a set of gloves. 3. Failing to ensure the facility's Infection Preventionist (IP) was able to articulate the facility's water management process to reduce the risk of Legionnaire's disease (a severe form of pneumonia [lung inflammation usually caused by infection]). 4. Facility failed to ensure the water management program was reviewed by the Infection Control Committee on an annual basis. These deficient practices had the potential to spread infection and cross contamination (the physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria [germs] from one person, object, or place to another) among staff and other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-19 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility's antibiotic stewardship program (a coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of drugs used to treat infections, including antibiotics [a medicine that inhibits the growth of or destroys bacteria or germs]) by failing to ensure the facility's monthly surveillance monitoring report was completed for 9/2023 and 10/2023. This deficient practice had the potential for residents to develop antibiotic resistance from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use for future infections. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/17/2023 at 7:29 p.m., with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the IP stated that the antibiotic stewardship program is a program that monitors the antibiotics used in the facility to ensure residents are appropriately prescribed antibiotics. The IP stated when the facility receives a physician's order for antibiotics for a resident, the licensed nurse will then fill out a surveillance date collection form (a systematic collection of data to track…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote one of three sampled resident's (Resident 4) dignity by failing to ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) was not standing over Resident 4 while assisting the resident with feeding. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the resident's sense of self-worth and self-esteem. Findings: A review of Resident 4's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 5/8/2023 with diagnoses including toxic encephalopathy (a disturbance of normal brain function) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 8/12/2023, indicated the resident had severely impaired cognition (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses) and was totally dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/18/2023 at 12:31 p.m., observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was documented evidence that education about an advanced directive (written document that indicated a person's wishes regarding medical treatment if that person is no longer able to communicate) was provided for one of three residents (Resident 17) investigated under the Advance Directives care area. This deficient practice violated Resident 17's and/or their representatives' right to be fully informed of the option to formulate an advance directive and had the potential to cause conflict due to lack of communication regarding Residents 17's wishes about their medical treatment. Findings: A review of Resident 17's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis the included fibromyalgia (a chronic [long-lasting] disorder that causes pain and tenderness throughout the body), encounter to palliative care (specialized medical care for people TV living with a serious illness), muscle weakness, and moderate calorie…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean comfortable and homelike environment for one of one sampled resident (Resident 35) by failing to repair peeling paint in the restroom door and failing to ensure that there was no hole in the drywall above Resident 35's bed. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the residents' comfort and well-being. Findings: A review of the Resident 35's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/19/2022 with diagnoses that included muscle weakness (a decrease in muscle strength), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), and dehydration (an abnormal loss of water from the body). A review of Resident 35's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care-screening tool), dated 8/26/2023 indicated the resident had clear speech, usually makes self-understood, and usually understand others. The MDS indicated that the resident required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan (a written course of action that helps a patient achieve outcomes that improve their quality of life) with measurable goals and objectives including person-centered interventions addressing a resident's hearing loss problem for one of one sampled resident (Resident 44) investigated under the care area Communication-Sensory. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of care and services to Resident 44. Findings: A review of Resident 44's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 6/10/2022, with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure), muscle weakness, and dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities). A review of Resident 44's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 6/15/2023, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-19 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled (Resident 44) resident investigated under the care area communication and sensory was provided a medical hearing consult promptly (the resident had been waiting approximately two months) after the resident was assessed to have a hearing loss problem. This deficient practice resulted in a delay in delivering the necessary care and services to maintain the resident`s ability to communicate. Findings: A review of Resident 44's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 06/10/2022 with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure), muscle weakness, and dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities). A review of Resident 44`s Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 06/15/2023, indicated the resident`s cognitive (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses) skills for daily decision making were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled residents (Resident 11) had on bilateral (both sides) heel protectors (device that can help prevent and treat heel pressure sores), as ordered by the physician, investigated for pressure ulcer/injury (a skin injury that occurs when an area of skin is under constant or prolonged pressure). This deficient practice placed the resident at risk of discomfort and development of new pressure ulcers. Findings: A review of Resident 11's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 7/31/2015 and readmitted the resident on 2/7/2021 with diagnoses including dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life). A review of Resident 11's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 8/12/2023, indicated the resident had severely impaired cognition (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility's pneumococcal vaccine (prevents infection from pneumonia [infection that infects one of both lungs]) policy by failing to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 36) was provided education regarding the pneumococcal vaccine. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 36 to not be aware of the risks and benefits of the pneumococcal vaccine. Findings: A review of Resident 36's admission Record indicated the facility readmitted the resident on 4/15/2021 with diagnoses that included encounter for attention to gastrostomy (an opening into the stomach from the abdominal wall, made surgically for the introduction of food), type two diabetes mellitus (a condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar) with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A review of Resident 36's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment and screening tool) dated 9/19/2023, indicated Resident 36 had intact cognitive (refers to conscious mental activities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect resident's right to be free from physical abuse (deliberately aggressive or violent behavior with the intention to cause harm) by Resident 1 for three of five sampled residents (Resident 2, Resident 3, and Resident 4). On 8/1/2023, facility staff witnessed Resident 1 hit Resident 2, Resident 3, and Resident 4. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2, Resident 3, and Resident 4 being subjected to physical abuse by Resident 1 while under the case of the facility and had the potential to cause emotion harm which could result to a feeling of low self-esteem and self-worth. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 7/6/2023 with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder (mental health condition with symptoms of schizophrenia [a mental condition in which one sees or hears people or things that do not exist] and a mood disorder [mental health condition that mainly affects your…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$72,521 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $47,754 — penalty dated 2024-11-07
  • $24,767 — penalty dated 2024-03-22
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-12-07 for 20 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-20 for 1 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ABBY GL LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST92%since 03/07/2019
ELLIE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 02/21/2019
SIMS, JAMESIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/21/2019
CRUZ, JULIOIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 02/21/2019
LYNCH, JOSEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL92%since 02/21/2019
PURSUE HEALTH LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
MICHAIL, JAMESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/27/2025
VALENCIA, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/27/2025
ERETZ VAN NUYS PROPERTIES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/07/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$516K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 53%Medicare 31%Other / private 16%

This home reported $516K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$463per resident / day
operating cost
$14,069per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$463per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555519. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next