Shasta Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 205 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 37.0 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.65 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.03 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · L2024-07-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — widespread
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that there was an alternative system in place by which resident Medication Administration Records (MARs), Treatment Administration Records (TARs), and Physician's Orders, could be accessed by staff in the event that the facility's Electronic Medical Record system (EMR, a computerized system that contained resident MARs, TARs, and Physician's Orders), was not available for 41 of 41 residents. On 7/17/24, the facility's EMR system administrator notified the facility that there was going to be a scheduled outage for EMR maintenance and that the EMRs would not be available on 7/18/24. The facility took no action to prepare for this planned outage and subsequently had no way for the nurses to administer medications, treatments (wound and skin care), or see what the physician currently had ordered for each resident. This failure resulted in the nursing staff ' s inability to know what each resident ' s current physician ' s orders were, therefore, the nursing staff was unable to administer medications or do wound care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-07-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (Resident 1), sampled for unsafe wandering (a random, aimless or repetitive search for an exit that is non-goal-directed), and elopement (a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without the facility's knowledge and supervision) was assessed and monitored for unsafe wandering and elopement. Resident 1 eloped twice from the facility and had no wander/elopement risk assessments or care planning done, and the facility had no dedicated alarm system in place for residents who wandered or were at risk to elope. This resulted in Resident 1 eloping from the facility and was found by the police in a ditch near a highway with a scratched face, bruised chin and pain in her right leg. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 7/2/24 at 4:18 pm, in the presence of the Administrator (Admin) and Director of Nursing (DON), due to not having an elopement system in place that ensured the health, safety and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-09-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who entered the facility without a pressure injury (PI, a bedsore) did not develop a PI, for one of two residents sampled for PI (Resident 1). Resident 1 developed a PI to her sacrum (bottom of the spine), which progressively worsened and the facility failed to follow their policies regarding wound care and changes of condition and inform Resident 1's physician when her PI changed and worsened.This delayed treatment for Resident 1's PI by six days, and resulted in a worsened and infected PI. Within two days of Resident 1 discharging from the facility, she was admitted to the acute care hospital for an infected PI and sepsis (an infection in the bloodstream) and osteomyelitis of the sacrum (an infection in the bone). This failure had the potential to delay wound healing for any resident who had wounds and/or PI's and subject them to substandard quality of care.Refer to F726 Findings:Review of the National Pressure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation guidelines were followed when:There was an undated gallon of milk in the refrigerator that was partially used, undated bags of bread in the dry goods storage area, an undated box of individual jelly packets in the dry goods storage area.There was a box of potatoes stored on the floor of the dry goods storage area, and a box of paper dining napkins stored on the floor of an outdoor storage area.There was brown crusty debris on baking pans, and the red and green cutting boards had cuts in the surfaces.The ice machine had a pale brown substance in the internal ice chute (where the ice comes down from the storage bin).These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses for all residents of the facility who ate food prepared by the kitchen and used ice.Findings:During a tour of the kitchen on 4/21/26 at 9:58 am, the Dietary Aid (DA) confirmed there was a gallon of milk in the refrigerator which was not dated upon opening and that it should have been dated.During a tour…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0551 — isolated
  Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one of twelve residents sampled (Resident 8) right to have an Interdisciplinary Team Meeting (IDT meeting, a meeting where the Interdisciplinary Team, a group of facility managers, discuss the care and services that the facility provides to their residents) with all the team members present to ensure decisions made regarding Resident 8 was in their best interest.This failure had the potential to result in decisions being made about Resident 8's health care that were not in their best interest.Refer to F841Findings:Review of a facility policy titled Consent: Residents Unable to Provide Informed Consent and Without a Health Care Decision-Maker- CA reviewed 1/16/26 indicated, It is the policy of this facility that an Interdisciplinary Team can make treatment decisions for residents when a physician determines that resident is unable to provide informed consent for a proposed treatment intervention because they cannot articulate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility did not ensure one out of 12 sampled residents (Resident 46) was able to safely self-administer medication when Resident 46's Albuterol inhaler (a fast-acting medication that opened the airways in the lungs and made breathing easier) was stored at the bedside and available for use. This had the potential for overdosing or incorrect usage which could lead to a decline in health status. Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication, Storage at Bedside, dated 1/16/26, indicated, that medications could only be kept at a resident's bedside if there was a Physician's order and the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, a group of medical professionals who met to discuss residents' care) had evaluated and approved the safety of self-administration A review of Resident 46's admission Record, dated 4/14/26, indicated admission to the facility on 4/14/26 with the diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (top part of the heart shakes instead of beating effectively causing an irregular heartbeat) and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0572 — isolated
  Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility did not ensure there was ongoing communication regarding resident rights during group activities. This had the potential for residents not to know how to effectively exercise their rights.Findings: A review of the Resident [NAME] of Rights, dated 8/1/25, indicated that residents had the right to be fully informed of their rights at the time of admission and during their stay in the facility. A review of the Resident Council Minutes, dated 10/23/25 through 4/16/26, did not include any information about resident rights being discussed. During an interview on 4/23/26 at 10:01 am, five out five confidentially interviewed residents were asked if the facility talked about or reviewed resident rights with them. Five out of five confidential residents indicated resident rights were not discussed during Resident Council meetings (a group of residents that meet monthly to discuss care concerns and their rights). Activities Director (AD) was present during the Resident Council at the request of the residents and confirmed, resident rights…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0577 — isolated
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the most recent recertification survey (an evaluation of the facility to ensure they are compliant with federal regulations, and clinical quality) was available to the residents of the facility.This failure resulted in a violation of resident rights. Findings:During a confidential interview of facility Resident Council (a group of residents who regularly meet to advocate for their right) on 4/23/26 at 10:01 am, the attendees of the meeting indicated that they did not know where in the facility to find the results of surveys conducted at the facility.During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/23/26 at 10:37 am the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the survey results binder was in the foyer (an entrance hall or entryway that acts as a transitional space between the outdoors and the main areas of a building, in which there is an outdoor entrance, followed by a room, and then another set of doors leading into the main area of the building) where any resident who could not open the interior…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two out of twelve sampled residents (Resident 6 and Resident 25) received the necessary services to maintain good personal grooming and hygiene when:1. Resident 6 did not receive a shower for twelve days.2. Resident 25 had a dark unknown substance crusted under their fingernails.These failures resulted in frustration and discomfort for Resident 6 and placed Resident 25 at risk for negative health outcomes related to poor hand hygiene.Findings: 1.Review of a facility policy titled ADLs (Activities of Daily Living e.g., feeding, bathing, dressing), Services to carry out reviewed 2/1/26 indicated, It is the policy of this facility that residents are given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his/her abilities.2. Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive necessary services to maintain.Personal hygiene. Review of Resident 6's admission record indicated admission to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0730 — isolated
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two of two Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) staff currently providing resident care received a performance evaluation annually. This resulted in the facility failing to asses staff's knowledge and skills to ensure staff had adequate skills and knowledge to provide quality care to all residents. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 4/24/26 at 9:00 am, with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Director of Staff Development (DSD), both confirmed that a process to ensure all CNAs received annual evaluations had not been implemented by the facility. DSD indicated she was aware that staff performance evaluations had not been carried out annually, but was unclear how long this had been an ongoing problem. DSD confirmed that the annual evaluations were necessary to identify areas where training was needed. Both DON and DSD confirmed that these evaluations had not yet been initiated for CNA's B and C. During an interview and concurrent record review, on 4/24/26 at 11:00 am, CNA B and CNA C's employee files were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure their medication error rate was less than 5 percent (5%), when the Medication Administration Pass Observation reflected three medication errors out of 25 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 12 percent (12%) as evidenced by: Resident 8 was not provided with a Physician ordered medication,2a. Resident 46 was not provided with a Physician ordered medication; and2b. Resident 46 was administered a higher dose of a medication than what the Physician ordered. This had the potential for residents to not attain or maintain their highest practicable level of physical, mental, functional and psycho-social well-being and have adverse medication outcomes.Findings: 1. A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Medication Administration, dated 1/16/26, indicated, medication would be administered as prescribed by the Physician. A review of Resident 8's admission Record, dated 9/29/25, indicated, admission to the facility on 9/29/25 with the diagnosis of bipolar disorder (a mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility did not ensure that medications stored in one of two medication carts contained labels for use that matched the Physician's orders for Resident 8. This failure had the potential to cause a medication error or for medication to run out early. Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Labeling and Storage of Drugs, dated 1/16/26, indicated, medication labels would include specific directions for use. The P&P indicated, when the medication label was incorrect, the medication would be returned to the pharmacy, or the Licensed Nurse (LN) would flag the medication label indicating there was a change in the directions for use. A review of Resident 8's admission Record, dated 9/29/25, indicated, admission to the facility on 9/29/25 with the diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment (a decline in memory or thinking that was not related to normal aging) and breakdown of internal fixation device (hardware such as metal plates, rods, or screws) of right humerus (upper arm bone). During a concurrent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0841 — isolated
  Designate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility did not ensure that the Medical Director (MD) effectively implemented resident care policies for one of two sampled residents (Resident 8) when:1. The facility failed to obtain a resident representative (RP, medical decision maker) who was unaffiliated with the facility (a person who is not connected to the business) for Resident 8.2. The MD acted as Resident 8's RP.This had the potential to result in decisions that were in the interest of the facility rather than the interest of Resident 8.Findings:Review of a facility policy titled, Consent: Residents Unable to Provide Informed Consent and Without a Health Care Decision-Maker - CA, reviewed 1/16/2026, indicated that the facility was responsible to assist residents in obtaining an RP if they were no longer able to make their own decisions, or had no family who could fill that role.Review of a facility policy titled Compliance Manual undated, indicated Personnel and employees.should not place themselves in a position where their actions, or the activities or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$84,526 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $24,518 — penalty dated 2025-09-12
• $60,008 — penalty dated 2024-07-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $962K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA