No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

West Covina Medical Center D/P SNF

725 S. Orange Avenue, West Covina, CA 91790 · For profit - Corporation · 33 certified beds · (626) 338-8481 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (626) 338-8481 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609) — most recent Jul 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (29% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
1500 W West Covina Pkwy · (626) 960-8614 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1500 W West Covina Pkwy · (626) 338-7233 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Vons0.7 mi
777 S Glendora Ave · (626) 337-5615 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1505 N Garvey Ave W · (626) 480-7878

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%4.0%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder11.8%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.9%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.9%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.2%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.3%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.9%12.0%17.1%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

<0.01U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
<0.01hours / resident / day
Physical therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show <0.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 0% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 196% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.431.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.49
RN hours/ resident / day
2.94
LPN hours/ resident / day
4.05
Aide hours/ resident / day
8.47
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.11
RN hoursweekends
29.3%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 33 beds and averages 20.2 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 8.47 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.49 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.05 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 6.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 9.10 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.64 to 1.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-18)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-18)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin (the source of the injury was not witnessed by any person and the source of the injury could not be explained by the resident and the injury is suspicious because of its extent, location, the number of injuries at a time, or the number of injuries over time) to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), Adult Protective Services (APS, the county agency responsible for investigating reports of abuse, neglect, or exploitation of elders and dependent adults), and the Ombudsman (an impartial advocate who investigates and helps resolve complaints between patients and healthcare organizations) within 24 hours for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) in accordance with state law and the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Unusual Occurrence Reporting.This deficient practice resulted in the delay of regulatory oversight and investigation of suspected abuse, resulting in the continued risk of harm to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurses accurately documented during each shift on 12/4/25 and 12/22/2025 as per facility's policy and procedures for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) investigated under quality of care. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1's medical record containing inaccurate documentation of patient assessment, which had the potential to affect Resident 1's provision of care. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 9/13/2024, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 had a medical diagnosis of Chronic Respiratory Failure (a serious condition that develops when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood), Alzheimer's Disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), with tracheostomy (a surgical procedure creating an opening in the neck into the windpipe to provide a direct airway for breathing, often using a tube, used for blockages,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise a plan of care for three of three sampled residents (Residents 4, 15 and 22), as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure titled Care Planning by failing to:a. Revise Resident 4's care plan following an unintended and significant 35 lbs. weight loss.b. Revise Resident 15's care plan who had Pneumonia on 11/25/2025.c. Revise Resident 22's care plan who had a weight loss in 10/2025 and 11/2025. These deficient practices had the potential for Residents 4, 15 and 22 to not receive appropriate care treatment and/or services specific to their individual needs. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility 10/21/25 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (lungs cannot adequately oxygenate {supply with oxygen} the blood or remove enough carbon dioxide), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung condition causing breathing difficulties) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper food storage handling practices in accordance with its policy and procedure (P&P) by failing to label and discard expired food items stored in one of one resident's refrigerator located inside the supply room at the nurse's station.The facility staff did not label food items with resident's name and current date.The facility staff did not remove expired food items from the resident's refrigerator.These deficient practices had the potential to result in foodborne illness (illness caused by consuming contaminated food or beverages) for the residents.Findings: During initial observation of the resident's refrigerator inside the supply room on 12/16/2025 at 12:11 PM, one box of pastries did not have a resident's name, room number or an expiration date, two blueberry yogurts did not have a resident's name or room number, six Ensure Drinks ( nutritional supplement designed as meal replacement or dietary supplement) did not have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote one of one sampled resident (Resident 15) with respect, privacy and dignity in accordance to facility's Policy and Procedure(P&P) titled Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity/Quality of Life. This deficient practice had the potential to cause psychosocial (mental and emotional well-being) decline and lowered self-esteem and self-worth. Findings: During a review of Resident 15's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included encounter for attention to tracheostomy (surgical opening in the throat in which a tube is placed for the resident's breathing), history of urinary tract infection (infection that affects part of the urinary tract) and quadriplegia (paralysis from the neck down, including legs, and arms). During a review of Resident 15's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 9/12/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment within 14 days after a change of condition for one of one sampled resident (Resident 4). This deficient practice placed Resident 4 at risk for delayed implementation of clinical interventions.Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility 10/21/25 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (lungs cannot adequately oxygenate {supply with oxygen} the blood or remove enough carbon dioxide), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung condition causing breathing difficulties) and heart failure (heart muscle isn't pumping blood effectively). During a review of Resident 4's History & Physical (H&P) dated 10/22/25, the H&P indicated Resident 4 did not have the capacity to make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 11/3/25, the MDS indicated Resident 4's cognition (ability to think and process information) was severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 28)'s discharge destination was coded accurately in the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool). Resident 28 was discharged to a general acute care hospital but was coded as being discharged to Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF - an inpatient rehabilitation and medical treatment center staffed with medical professionals). This deficient practice resulted in inaccurate reporting to the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid (CMS, a federal agency that administers the Medicare program and works with state governments to administer the Medicaid and health insurance portability standards) agency and had the potential to result in Resident 28 not receiving interventions to address specific care concerns. Findings: During a review of Resident 28's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dependence on respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report a change of condition (COC) for symptoms of a urinary tract infection (UTI) to the physician (MD) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 4) with foley catheter (a flexible tube that passes through the urethra and inserted into the bladder to drain urine). Resident 4's foley catheter tubing had cloudy, white urine sediments (bacteria and white blood cells are shed into the urine). This failure had the potential to result in delay of care and treatment of urinary tract infection (UTI) and unmanaged UTI pain.Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility 10/21/25 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (lungs cannot adequately oxygenate {supply with oxygen} the blood or remove enough carbon dioxide), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung condition causing breathing difficulties) and heart failure (heart muscle isn't pumping blood effectively). During a review of Resident 4's History & Physical (H&P) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Registered Dietitian's (RD) recommendation for one of one sampled resident (Resident 22) to start weekly weights on 11/5/2025 was implemented/carried out and communicated to the physician. This deficient practice had the potential to result in adverse consequences for Resident 22. Findings: During a review of Resident 22's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included encounter for attention to gastrostomy (creation of an artificial external opening into the stomach for medication/nutritional support), encounter for attention to tracheostomy (surgical opening in the throat in which a tube is placed for the resident's breathing) and anemia (decrease in the total amount of red blood cells in the blood). During a review of Resident 22's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 9/25/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 22 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, one of one License Vocational Nurse (LVN 3) did not flush Resident 23's Gastrostomy Tube (GT- a feeding tube placed directly into the stomach through the abdominal wall, used to deliver nutrition, fluids, and medicine) with water before and after giving medication, to prevent the GT from clogging, to ensure the medication passes, and ensure patency of the GT for future use. This deficient practice had the potential to result in negative consequences for Resident 23.Findings: During a review of Resident 23's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure (a condition when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood), encounter for attention to tracheostomy (surgical opening in the throat in which a tube is placed for the resident's breathing), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing food or liquids) and encounter for attention to gastrostomy (creation of an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act upon the pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review (MRR, a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences associated with medication) recommendation for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) to specify the behavior manifestation to be monitored for Resident 1's routine Xanax (a medication used for the short-term treatment of anxiety disorders and panic disorders) 0.5 milligrams (mg- unit of measurement) QHS (every night at bedtime) for anxiety, ordered on 9/13/2025, for the months of October and November 2025. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 to receive unnecessary medications and result in undesirable or non-therapeutic effect of the medication to the resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, Licensed Vocational Nurse 5 (LVN 5) failed to ensure medications were kept secure by failing to lock one of one medication cart (MedCart) that was left unattended and outside of LVN 5's view while providing medication to Resident 3. This deficient practice had the potential for the residents' medications to be accessible to others not authorized to have access to drugs (medications) and biologicals (drugs derived from natural sources) and increased the risk for loss and medication diversion (illegally redirecting prescription medications from intended patient for personal use). Findings: During medication pass observation on 12/18/2025 at 8:25 AM with LVN 5 in the hallway outside Resident 3's room, LVN 5 left the MedCart in the hallway unlocked. During an interview with LVN 5 on 12/18/2025 at 8:38 AM, LVN 5 stated, I did not lock my MedCart when I went inside the resident's room (Resident 3) to give medications. I should have locked the MedCart and not left it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and follow infection prevention procedures to prevent the transmission of infectious organisms for one of five sampled residents (Resident 24) by failing to wear proper personal protective equipment (PPE, equipment that protects people from injury or illness in hazardous environments) while providing care to Resident 24 who was placed on Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP, precautions that involve using a glove and gown during high-contact resident care activity for residents who are colonized or infected with an multidrug-resistant organisms [MDRO, bacteria that is resistant to many types of antibiotics] and those at a higher risk of developing a MDRO, such as, residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices). This deficient practice had the potential to transmit infectious microorganisms and increase the risk of infection for Resident 24 and staff that could result in a widespread infection in the facility.Findings: During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs for two of two sampled residents (Residents 2 and 123) by failing to ensure the residents' call lights were within reach and appropriate to the resident's physical ability. These deficient practices had the potential for Residents 2 and 123 not to receive necessary care or received delayed services to meet their needs. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 123's Face Sheet (FS), the FS indicated Resident 123 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure (a long-term condition that occurs when the lungs could not exchange enough oxygen and carbon dioxide in the body) and dependence on ventilator (a medical device to help support or replace breathing). During a review of Resident 123's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 8/22/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 123 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide information on Advance Directive (AD- a process of communication between individuals and their healthcare agents for future healthcare decisions when individuals are no longer able to make their own healthcare decisions) for three of three sampled residents (Residents 6,14, and 20) in accordance with the facility's policy on Advance Directives. These failures had the potential for facility staff to provide medical treatment against the residents' will. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 20's Face sheet (FS), the FS indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 20 on 8/23/2024 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure (a condition in which not enough oxygen passes from the lungs into the blood) and encounter for attention to tracheostomy (surgical opening in the throat in which a tube is placed for the resident's breathing). During a review of Resident 20's Minimum Data Set Minimum Data Set (MDS,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for gastrostomy tube (GT, a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach) site as ordered by the physician and as indicated in the plan of care for two of three sampled residents (Residents 2 and 123 ). These failures had the potential for complications related to tube feedings for Residents 2 and 123. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 123's Face Sheet (FS), the FS indicated Resident 123 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure (a long-term condition that occurs when the lungs could not exchange enough oxygen and carbon dioxide in the body), dependence on ventilator (a medical device to help support or replace breathing) and gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach) malfunction. During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: a. Ensure the oxygen cannula (tubing used to deliver oxygen) was connected to the tracheostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the neck into the windpipe to help a person breathe) with a T-Bar (a T shaped device) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 4). b. Follow the physician's order for tracheostomy care for one of one sampled resident (Resident 16) These deficient practices placed Residents 4 and 16 at risk for complications of shortness of breath and infection. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 4's Face Sheet (FS), the FS indicated the facility admitted Resident 4 on 3/26/2024 with diagnoses that included encounter for attention to tracheostomy and pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs). During a review of Resident 4's Physician Order (PO) dated 3/26/2024, the PO indicated an order for licensed staff to apply continuous oxygen at two (2) liters per minute (L/min) via T-bar with humidifier.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow it's policy and procedure on storing, preparing, distributing and serving food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, proper sanitation and food handling practices by failing to ensure: 1. Thawed meat was stored on the top shelf in one of one refrigerator. 2. Stored food items were labeled and dated when it was first opened, in one of three kitchen freezers. These deficient practices had the potential risk for food borne illnesses (infections caused by ingesting contaminated food or beverages). Findings: 1. During an initial tour of the kitchen on 10/15/2024 at 9:34 am, together with Dietary Aid 1 (DA 1), one bag of uncooked meat and one bag of uncooked sausage being thawed were placed on the top shelf of the refrigerator. There were16 pieces of uncovered sliced bread placed on a tray on the second shelf immediately below the uncooked meat and sausage being thawed. The DA 1 stated, thawed meat should not be placed or thawed on top of the bread because blood from the thawed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's indwelling catheter (foley catheter - thin, sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a bag outside the body) bag was covered and provided the resident privacy in accordance with the facility's policy on Urinary Catheter, Insertion and Care for one of one sampled resident (Resident 17). This deficient practice had the potential to result in psychosocial (mental and emotional well-being) decline and lowered self-esteem and self-worth for the resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 17's Face sheet (FS), the FS indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 17 on 12/10/2018 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bladder (stores urine) disorder and urinary tract infection (UTI- infection that affects any part of the urinary tract). During a review of Resident 17's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 9/17/2024, the MDS indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (public advocate) of the Notice of Proposed Transfer and Discharge for one of three sampled resident's (Resident 22) transfer to the General Acute Hospital (GACH) on 8/8/2024 in accordance with facility's policy on Transfer and Discharge (Including Against Medical Advice [AMA].) This deficient practice had the potential to violate Resident 22's right to ensure for an appropriate discharge/transfer from the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 22's Facesheet (FS), the FS indicated the facility admitted Resident 22 on 4/8/2024 with diagnoses that included encounter for attention to tracheostomy (an opening surgically created through the neck into the windpipe to allow air to fill the lungs) and pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs). During a review of Resident 22's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 7/18/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 22 had moderately impaired cognition (mental action or process of acquiring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to promote healing of pressure ulcer/injury (PU/PI, localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 14), as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to result in worsening or re occurrence of pressure injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's Face Sheet (FS), the FS indicated Resident 14 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure (a long-term condition that prevents the body from exchanging oxygen and carbon dioxide) and gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach). During a review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 9/27/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 14 had no speech, rarely/never understood others, and made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Restorative Nurse Assistant (RNA, a specialized role for certified nursing assistants that involves training in rehabilitation skills) services was provided to one of one sampled resident (Resident 123) as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice had the potential for a decline in range of motion (ROM, measure of joint flexibility and functionality), stiffness and contractures (a stiffening/shortening at any joint, that reduces the joint's range of motion) for Resident 123. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 123's Face Sheet (FS), the FS indicated, Resident 123 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure (a long-term condition that occurs when the lungs could not exchange enough oxygen and carbon dioxide in the body), and dependence on ventilator (a medical device to help support or replace breathing). During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 14) received care and service for parenteral antibiotic (a drug used to treat infections caused by bacteria and other microorganisms) consistent with professional standards of practice to label and date a peripherally inserted intravenous (IV) catheter. This failure had the potential to result in infection to the resident and worsen the resident's overall health condition. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's Face Sheet (FS), the FS indicated Resident 14 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure (a long-term condition that prevents the body from exchanging oxygen and carbon dioxide) and gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach). During a review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 9/27/2024, the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act upon the consultant pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review (MRR) recommendation for one of five sampled residents (Resident 8). This failure had the potential to result in undesirable or non-therapeutic effect of the medication to the resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 8's Face Sheet (FS), the FS indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure (a long-term condition that prevents the body from exchanging oxygen and carbon dioxide) and gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach). During a review of Resident 8's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 9/26/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 8 had unclear speech, sometimes understood others, and made self-understood. Resident 8 was dependent (helper does all of the effort) for personal hygiene and showering/bathing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility staff used Personal Protection Equipment (PPE- protective clothing, helmets, goggles, or other garments or equipment designed to protect the wearer's body from injury or infection) in accordance with the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) on infection prevention and control for one of five sampled residents (Resident 14). This deficient practice had the potential to spread infection and transmission of communicable diseases. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's Face Sheet (FS), the FS indicated Resident 14 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure (a long-term condition that prevents the body from exchanging oxygen and carbon dioxide) and gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach). During a review of Resident 14's Physician Orders (PO) dated 8/13/2024, the PO indicated Resident 14 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep an electric fan (a powered machine used to create a flow of air to cool and ventilate rooms and control humidity) in a safe, operating, and sanitary condition for one of one sampled resident (Resident 123). This failure had the potential to affect Resident's 123 quality of life and overall health. Findings: During a review of Resident 123's Face Sheet (FS), the FS indicated Resident 123 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure (a long-term condition that occurs when the lungs could not exchange enough oxygen and carbon dioxide in the body) and dependence on ventilator (a medical device to help support or replace breathing). During a review of Resident 123's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 8/22/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 123 had severely impaired cognition (ability to understand). The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based in interview and record review, three of four sampled staff (Pharmacy Technician 1[PTech 1], Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 [LVN 1] and Registered Nurse 1 [RN 1]) did not know to report allegation of abuse to the state agency as indicated in the facility's Policy and Procedure titled Elder and Dependent Adult Abuse. This deficient practice had the potential for employees not to report an abuse incident to the state agency, which could lead to possible harm and risk of further abuse of the residents. Findings: During an interview on 11/21/2023 at 9:31 am, with PTech 1, PTech 1 stated she worked full time for 30 years in the facility. PTech 1 stated she was a mandated reporter and she had to report to Ombudsman if an abuse was witnessed in the facility. RN 1 stated she did not remember that she needed to report any kind of abuse to the State Agency or California Department of Public Health (CDPH) and local law enforcement agency. PTech 1 stated it was important to report to CDPH and enforcement agency because they investigate abuse cases. During an interview on 11/21/2023 at 9:40…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY b. During a review of Resident 1's admission record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 4/22/2022 with diagnoses that included elevated white blood cell count (WBC - part of body's immune system that helps to fight infection), and dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember, severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning). During a review of Resident 1's MDS dated [DATE], the MDS indicated, Resident 1's cognition for daily decision making was severely impaired. The MDS indicated Resident 1 required total dependence with two-person physical assistance with bed mobility, transfer (how resident moves between surfaces including to or from bed, chair, wheelchair, standing position), dressing, and toilet use. During a review of Resident 1's Physician order, dated 6/15/2022, the physician's order indicated to give Resident 1 Lorazepam (antianxiety [medication to treat anxiety [emotion characterized by feelings of tension, worried thoughts and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and monitor the presence of white sediments (visible particles in the urine that may contain red or white blood cells, casts, bacteria, fungi, parasites in the urine that could indicate infection or dehydration [fluid deficit]) in the urine for two of two sampled residents (Residents 8 and 22 ) with indwelling catheter (foley catheter - a tube inserted in the bladder to drain urine into a drainage bag), as indicated in the facility's Policy and Procedure, titled Urinary Catheter, Insertion and Care and the resident's care plan for foley catheter. This deficient practice had the potential for Residents 8 and 22 to receive no care or delayed care and treatment for urinary tract infection (UTI, condition in which bacteria invade and grow in any part the urinary system). Findings: a. During a review of Resident 22's Face Sheet, the face sheet indicated Resident 22 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included neuromuscular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for gastrostomy tube (GT, a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach) feeding as ordered by the physician and as indicated in the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) and plan of care for two of five sampled residents (Residents 11 and 12) by failing to: a. Ensure Resident 11 received the recommended tube feeding formula and amount of gastrostomy tube feeding. b. Ensure to apply drain sponge to the gastrostomy site and anchor the gastrostomy tube of Resident 12. These failures had the potential for complications related to tube feedings for Residents 11 and 12. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 11's Face Sheet, the face sheet indicated Resident 11 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dependence on ventilator (a machine that support or replace the breathing of an ill or injured person) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label and date intravenous catheter (IV, a thin plastic tube inserted into a vein using a needle allowing for the administration of medications, fluids and/or blood products.) for three out of three sampled residents (Resident 21, 20 and 7). These failures had the potential to result in infection to the residents and worsen the residents' health condition. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 21's Face Sheet, the face sheet indicated Resident 21 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease that occurs when blood glucose/blood sugar is too high.) and heart failure (a condition that develops when the heart doesn't pump enough blood for the body's needs). During a review of Resident 21's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and care screening tool) dated 10/17/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 21 had no speech, rarely/never understood others, and rarely/never made self-understood.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure competent nursing staff for two of five staff (Licensed Vocational Nurse 7 [LVN 7], and Registered Nurse Supervisor 3 [RN Sup 3]) by failing to ensure the Department Manager completed and validated the performance evaluation as indicated in the facility's Policy and Procedure titled Evaluation Process. This deficient practice had the potential for residents not to receive appropriate nursing care and services. Findings: During a concurrent record review and interview on 11/20/2023 at 2:04 pm with the Director of Staff and Development (DSD), LVN 7's employee file was reviewed. The DSD stated LVN 7 worked full time in the facility since 4/22/2021. During a concurrent record review and interview on 11/20/2023 at 2:10 pm with the DSD, RN Sup 3's employee file was reviewed. The DSD stated RN Sup 3 worked full time in the facility since 4/9/2015. During a concurrent record review of the licensed staff's Performance Evaluation and interview on 11/20/2023 at 3:28 pm with the DSD, the DSD stated the Assistant Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a consent for psychotropic medication (any drug that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) use for two of five sampled residents (Residents 1 and 18). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 and 18 to receive unnecessary medications. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 18's Face Sheet, the face sheet indicated Resident 18 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- type of obstructive lung disease characterized by long-term poor airflow) and hypertension (increased blood pressure). During a review of Resident 18's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and care screening tool) dated 8/10/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 18 had unclear speech, sometimes understood others, and sometimes made self-understood. Resident 18 was totally dependent (full staff performance) for bed mobility, dressing and personal hygiene. During a review of Resident 18's Physician Order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide safe, and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases (one that is spread from one person to another) for three of three sampled residents (Residents 1, 20 and 21) by failing to ensure: a. Registered Nurse Supervisor 2 (RN Sup 2) performed hand hygiene before contact with Resident 1. b. Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) performed hand hygiene before contact with Resident 20. c. Resident 21's nasal cannula ( tube which on one end splits into two prongs which are placed in the nostrils to deliver oxygen) tubing was labeled and dated. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for infection. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 1's admission record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 4/22/2022 with diagnoses that included elevated white blood cell count (WBC - part of body's immune system helps to fight infection), and dementia (long…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-22 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain patient care equipment in safe operating condition for one of two beds inspected and the facility staff did not communicate with the facility Maintenance Department when the bed indicators flashed. This failure had the potential to result in compromised resident's safety. Findings: During an observation of the facility on 11/20/2023 at 8:48 am, while in Resident 6's room, Resident 6 was lying in a bed with multiple LED (light-emitting diode) indicators flashing that included [NAME] 30+(patient's head is elevated more than 30 degrees), low height, bed exit and side rails. During an observation on 11/20/2023 at 3:37 pm, in Resident 6's room, Resident 6's bed had the LED flashing with the same indicators observed from this morning at 8:48 am. During an observation on 11/21/2023 at 9:38 am, in Resident 6's room, Resident 6's bed had the LED flashing with the same indicators observed from yesterday (11/20/2023). During a concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ROLLINS-NELSON HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.4+1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.3+1.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
L A DOWNTOWN MEDICAL CENTER LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/01/2019
WEST COVINA PROPERTY HOLDING, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
BESHARAT, FARIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
FRANCISCO, ANNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
SIREGAR, CHRISTOPHERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2019
NELSON, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
ROLLINS, VICKIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555649. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next