Presbyterian Intercomm Hosp DP/SNF

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 155 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 23.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 108 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 99% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 65% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 35 beds and averages 29.2 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 10.07 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 4.42 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.07 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 8.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 10.63 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 4.86 to 3.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 20% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity and respect when a care view camera (a specialized camera designed for patient monitoring in healthcare setting that allows healthcare professionals to remotely observe residents and intervene if necessary, typically for safety purposes like fall prevention) was placed in the resident's room for four (4) of eight (8) sampled residents (Residents 33, 49, 60 and 64). This failure resulted in Resident 33, 49, 60 and 64 experiencing feelings of discomfort and not having any personal privacy.1. During a review of Resident 49’s admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of septic discitis (infection discitis; a serious condition where the intervertebral [a flat, round “cushion” located between each vertebra {small, bony segments that make up the spine or backbone} in the spine, acting as a shock absorber and allowing for movement] disc spaces in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy titled, Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI - a standardized process used in nursing homes to collect information about residents' needs and strengths, enabling the creation of individualized care plans) Process, for two (2) of six (6) sampled residents (Residents 46 and 57) by not ensuring the comprehensive resident assessment was completed within 14 calendar days of resident's admission. This failure had the potential to result in Residents 46 and 57 not having an individualized care plan, which could negatively affect the residents' over all wellbeing.1. During a review of Resident 46's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of metastatic (the spread of cancerous [a disease in which cells grow and divide abnormally, without control] cells from the original [primary] tumor to other parts of the body, forming new tumors [metastases] in those…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and transmit a discharge tracking assessment (a type of assessment conducted when a resident leaves a nursing home, which includes clinical items for quality monitoring as well as discharge tracking and is transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS; a United States government agency that administers healthcare programs]) for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident 57). This failure had the potential to result in the facility's inaccurate quality monitoring data at transition points, such as when residents enter or leave the facility. During a review of Resident 57's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of pyelonephritis (a type of urinary tract infection [UTI; an infection in the bladder/urinary tract] that specifically affects one or both kidneys) and chronic respiratory failure (a long-term condition where the respiratory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 1 sampled Resident (Resident 65) who was receiving nutrition by nasogastric tube feeding (NGT - a method of providing nutrition and medication directly into the stomach through a tube inserted through the nose) was provided care to prevent aspiration by failing to ensure the resident's head of the bed was elevated during feeding in accordance with the facility's policy. This deficient practice placed Resident 65 at risk of aspiration (feeding could enter the windpipe and lungs) that could lead to lung problems such as pneumonia (an infection/inflammation of the lungs). Findings:During a review of Resident 65's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer a medication for one (1) of seven (7) sampled residents (Resident 5) as indicated on the physician's order. This failure had the potential to place Resident 5 at risk for developing a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI; an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) due to not receiving her Estradiol (hormone medication used for regulating various bodily processes). During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and coronary artery disease (CAD; a condition where the blood vessels that supply the heart become narrowed or blocked). During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated (date), the MDS indicated the resident had intact cognitive (ability to think, remember, and reason) skills for daily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have accurate and complete medical records for one (1) of seven (7) sampled residents (Residents 60) by failing to document the Nurse Practitioner (NP, a registered nurse with advanced education and training, holding a master's or doctoral degree in nursing) notification of Resident 60's refusal to take Atenolol (drug used to treat high blood pressure) in accordance with the facility's policy. This deficient practice resulted in the inaccurate representation of care provided which could delay the provision of necessary care and services needed for Resident 60's wellbeing.Findings: During a review of Resident 60's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included urinary retention (a condition in which the resident is unable to empty all the urine from his bladder) and acute kidney injury (sudden and rapid decline in kidney function). During a review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the Department of Health Services (DHS a government agency that promotes and protects the health of all people and their communities) and the state agencies within the two-hour time frame as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure for one of two sampled residents (Resident 69). The Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 did not report to the Director of Nursing (DON) when Resident 69 reported to LVN 2 that a staff member (unknown) yelled and was mean to Resident 69. This deficient practice violated the resident's rights to be free from any form of abuse and the potential for Resident 69 not to be protected and to further experience mental and emotional abuse that could lead to a psychosocial (mental and emotional being) and decline. Findings: During a review of Resident 69 Face Sheet Report indicated Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 69's admission History…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen. During initial tour of the kitchen, an opened container of salad was observed unlabeled with the name of the food item and dated of when the food was prepared or to be discarded. This failure had the potential for improper food storage, which could lead to foodborne illnesses (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins). Findings: During an initial tour of the kitchen, on 7/12/2024 at 5:55 PM, with the Supervisor Food Services (SFS) an opened container of salad, wrapped in clear plastic wrap, was observed in the facility ' s cold production refrigerator. The container was unlabeled with the name of the food item and dated of when the food was prepared or to be discarded. The SFS stated the container of salad might be a staff ' s personal salad. The SFS stated the container should not be stored in the cold production container if it was a staff person ' s salad. The SFS stated all food items should be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote care that maintained dignity and respect for one of one sampled residents (Resident 11) by failing to ensure Resident 11's drainage bag (a tube that removes fluid from the body into a collection bag connected to the resident that stored body fluids) from the stomach that was hanging from on the resident's bed frame was not exposed to the public and uncovered. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the resident's psychosocial (emotional and mental status) being and deprive the resident from dignity. Findings: During initial tour of the facility, on 7/12/24 at 6:48 pm, Resident 11 was observed in the room, laying lying in bed, with a catheter bag hanging on the right side of the residents' bed, exposed to the public and un-covered was with cloudy sediments (matter that settles in the bottom of the tube or bag) in the tubing and bag, was observed. During a review of Resident 11's Face Sheet Report (an admission record),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-14 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two closed sampled residents (Resident 13), received notification of the transfer/discharge from the facility and the reasons for the move in writing. As a result of this failure the facility deprived Resident 13 the right to be informed regarding transfer and discharge from the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 13's Facesheet Report (AR, admission Record), the AR indicated Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular rate (a-fib with RVR, an abnormal heart rhythm). The AR indicated Resident 13's was discharged from the facility to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) on 4/20/2024. During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/14/2024 at 2:44 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON), of the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated Resident 13 was not notified in writing of Resident 13's transfer/discharge to GACH. The DON stated Resident 13 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 69 rows in the source record cover these 34 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in CA