Whittier Nursing And Wellness Center, INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

22.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 83 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 83.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 74 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 68% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 36 beds and averages 34.6 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.16 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.87 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.15 on weekdays — about the same on weekends as weekdays. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 20% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jdisputed · IDR2024-09-19 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary services (drug counseling and surveillance [monitoring of behavior; activities]) and develop person centered care plans for the behavioral healthcare needs for substance abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who had a history of drug abuse (the excessive or addictive use of drugs for nonmedical purposes) and prevent Resident 1 from experiencing a drug overdose (an excessive and dangerous dose of a drug) of opiate (a controlled drug used to treat pain or cause sleep) and fentanyl (a powerful, controlled drug that is used to treat severe pain) while residing in the facility by failing to: 1. Develop and implement behavior health care plans for drug abuse to meet the behavioral needs of Resident 1 ' s when Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility from the General Acute Care Hospital 2 (GACH) on [DATE] in accordance with the facility policies and procedures [P&P] titled Behavioral assessment, intervention and monitoring…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) worked 8 consecutive hours seven days a week in the facility including the following weekends: 10/18/2025, 10/19/2025, 10/25/2025 10/26/2025, 11/16/2025/ 11/22/2025, and 11/29/2025 that care for 30 or 30 residents in the facility. This deficient practice had the potential for the residents' care not to be supervised and assessed clinically by the RN which could affect the quality of care and quality of life of the residents. Findings: During a review of the facility's Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD, a staffing metric ensuring enough caregiver time per resident, calculated as total direct care hours divided by patient census) from 9/2025 to 11/2025, indicated there was no RN on duty for 8 consecutive hours for the following dates: 10/18/2025, 10/19/2025, 10/26/2025, 11/16/2025/ 11/22/2025, and 11/29/2025 in the facility. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/3/2025 at 1:42 PM, the DON stated the facility did not require an RN for 8 hours on the weekends…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0732 — pattern
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that accurate and current nurse staffing data [total number and actual hours worked by licensed (Registered Nurses [RNs], License Vocational Nurses [LVNs]) and unlicensed nurses (Certified Nursing Assistant [CNAs])] were posted daily at the beginning of each shift (11 PM - 7 AM, 6:30 AM - 3 PM, and 3 PM - 11 PM) to care for 30 residents of 30 residents. These deficient practices of posting inaccurate and outdated nurse staffing data had the potential to mislead and prevent residents and families from verifying the facility's daily staffing levels. This could result in distrust and a perceived lack of accountability in maintaining accurate and adequate staffing necessary for timely resident care. Findings: During an observation on 12/02/2025 at 9:30 AM, an untitled facility document was observed posted in the facility's front lobby. The document posted in the front lobby indicated the Facility Census was 30. The facility document indicated the nursing staffing information according to licensed nurses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow safe and proper food storage practices in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) by failing to label and date food items and discard expired food inside the facility's kitchen. This failure had the potential to cause food-borne illness (illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages) and adversely affect the health of the residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/1/2025 at 8:43 with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) in the kitchen, the following were found: An opened five pounds (a unit of weight) container of sour cream with use by 11/30/2025 label on the lid inside the refrigerator. An opened unlabeled and undated two bags of carrots inside the refrigerator. A tray of unlabeled and undated individually prepared ice cream cups with a marking 11/19 on the clear plastic wrap covering the tray inside the freezer. An opened unlabeled and undated one gallon (a unit of volume) of corn oil under a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) reviewed for resident's rights did not have Advance Directive (a legal document for stating medical wishes if one was unable to communicate) in resident's medical chart. This deficient practice had the potential to result in misinformation of medical care and treatment and not honoring resident's wishes in cases where the resident and/or responsible party was unable to participate in making healthcare decisions. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included disorder of brain, cellulitis (a bacterial infection of the skin and the tissues beneath the skin) of right lower limb, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (happens when the body cannot use insulin correctly and sugar builds up in the blood) with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage in people with diabetes). During a review of Resident 3's History and Physical (H&P), dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to set the Alternating Pressure Mattress (APM, mattress that provides pressure redistribution by filling and un-filling air cells within the mattress so that contact points with the body are reduced) according to the resident's weight as indicated in the manufacturer's recommendation and physicians orders for one of one sampled residents (Resident 14) reviewed for pressure ulcer (skin injury due to prolonged unrelieved pressure or skin friction). Resident 14's mattress was observed set for 350 pounds (lbs.) while the resident weights 99lbs. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 14 to develop worsened or new pressure ulcer or injury and/or delay the resident's wound to heal. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 14 on 5/10/2023 and most recently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2 - a condition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an assessment was completed and documented after dialysis (a treatment to clean one's blood by removing waste and extra fluid when the kidneys are unable to) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 7) reviewed for quality of care. This failure had the potential to put Resident 1 at risk for hypotension (low blood pressure [BP- the force of your blood pushing against your artery walls, like water in a hose]), bleeding, and access site (area on the body where the dialysis machine hooks up to the blood for dialysis) complications leading to hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Resident 7's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 7 on 9/21/2022 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to end stage renal disease ( ESRD - an irreversible kidney failure), heart failure (when the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs, leading to symptoms like shortness of breath,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs), received services to maintain good oral hygiene as indicated in the care plan by the certified nurse assistant (CNA) 1 after Resident 1 had been assisted and finished with his meal. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for diseases of the mouth, gums, and teeth, and aspiration (something other than air gets into your airways) of the food pieces in the mouth could further lead to pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs). Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR) the AR indicated that the facility originally admitted Resident 1 on 10/3/2024 and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (a series of neurological disorders result from systemic illness), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment to one of thirteen sampled residents (Resident 2) by failing to provide the resident an extra blanket when the resident was cold at night. This deficient practice had the potential to expose the resident to an increased risk of hypothermia, discomfort, chills, worsening of existing medical conditions, and potential for skin breakdown from cold exposure. Findings: A review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 3/16/2023 and readmitted the resident on 1/29/2024 with diagnoses that include generalized muscle weakness and depression (a serious mental health condition that can impact how a person feels, thinks, and acts). A review of Resident 45 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS – a resident assessment tool), dated 11/18/2024, indicated that the resident ' s cognition (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and senses) was moderately impaired. During an interview with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0576 — pattern
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure six of 6 sampled residents (Resident 28, 20, 21, 2, 5, and 81), received personal mails when delivered on Saturdays at the facility. This failure resulted in violating Resident 28, Resident 20, Resident 21, Resident 2, Resident 5, and Resident 81 rights to received mail on Saturdays which could result of missing important and timely correspondence. Findings: During an interview on 11/5/2024 at 10:00 AM, during Resident Council Meeting, Resident 28, Resident 20, Resident 21, Resident 2, Resident 5, and Resident 81 stated they received mail unopened on Monday through Friday but did not receive mails on Saturdays. During an interview on 11/5/2024 at 10:45 AM with the Business Office Manager (BOM), the BOM stated she was responsible for releasing the mail from Monday through Friday to Social Service Director (SSD-also was the Activity Director in the facility) or Activity Assistant. The BOM stated the SSD or Activity Assistant were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0732 — pattern
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post an accurate facility staffing data in a prominent place where 32 of 32 residents and their representaives and visitors could easily view. This deficient practice had the potential to compromise the quality of care the residents receive due to potential insufficient staffing in the facility. Findings: During an observation on 11/04/24 at 04:28 PM, a staffing data dated 11/04/24 was posted to a wall behind the counter of the facility's nurse's station. The staffing data was not easily visible to read from the countertop in the nursing station that was approximately 10 feet away and was not accessible to the residents or visitors. During a concurrent review of the staffing data, the form indicated that the census was 41 for 11/04/24. A review of the facility's census dated 11/4/24 indicated that the resident census was 32. During an interview with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) on 11/06/24 at 01:07 PM, she stated that the staffing data that she posted on the wall at the Nurses Station in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$13,627 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-09-19
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-18 for 1 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA