Adara Living
12975 Sheridan Blvd, Broomfield, CO 80020 · For profit - Corporation · 210 certified beds · (303) 785-5800 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $10,358 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-08)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.7% | 13.4% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.0% | 4.7% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.6% | 1.4% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.7% | 8.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.1% | 3.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.7% | 13.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.6% | 11.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.7% | 94.7% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.4% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.7% | 21.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 36.4% | 20.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.0% | 1.6% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 67.4% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.43 | 1.38 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.39 | 1.74 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
33.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 33.8%CMS range 22.4–49.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.0%CMS range 7.9–15.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.79 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 210 beds and averages 178.8 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.447 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.77 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (#156) out of 71 sample residents were free from significant medication errors. Specifically, the facility failed ensure Resident #156, who was recently hospitalized for an acute embolism and was a high risk for deep vein thrombosis (DVT), was administered anticoagulant medication (Eliquis) as ordered upon discharge from the hospital. The facility failed to ensure the transcription of medications from the hospital records was accurate, which resulted in a failure to provide anticoagulant medication, which led to the resident developing a pulmonary embolism resulting in cardiac arrest. The facility's failure to administer the anticoagulant therapy, as was indicated by the hospital discharge records, led to the resident's change of condition and ultimately, his death, from cardiac arrest due to a pulmonary embolism. The failure to ensure the accurate transcription of physician's orders placed residents at risk for serious harm or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#19 and #18) of nine residents reviewed for medication management were free from significant medication errors out of 22 sample residents.Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia with behavioral disturbance, respiratory failure, peripheral vascular disease, and thrombocytopenia (a deficiency of platelets in the blood). On 8/21/25 at 6:38 p.m. Resident #19 was sent out to the emergency department from the facility due to an acute change of condition. Resident #19 was found to have low blood pressure, a decrease in responsiveness, an increase in lethargy and was unable to follow the nursing staff's commands. While at the hospital, it was documented Resident #19 suffered an accidental medication overdose after she was given another resident's medications. It was documented the resident received amlodipine (used to treat high blood pressure), metoprolol (used to relax blood vessels and slow heart rate),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a dignified experience. The facility failed to ensure Resident #113 did not experience feeling humiliation during an episode of incontinence. The facility failed to treat Resident #127 with respect and dignity when the staff used foul language toward him and told him to clean his own bathroom. Additionally, the facility failed to provide a culture and environment that promoted residents being treated with dignity and respect. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Rights and Facility Responsibilities policy and procedure, undated, was provided by the administrator in training (AIT) on 7/26/23 at 1:30 p.m. It revealed, in pertinent part, It is the facility's policy to abide by all resident rights, and to communicate these rights to residents and their designated representative in a language that they can understand. A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2023-08-08 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to have a system for identifying deviations in performance and adverse events, and develop and implement appropriate quality assurance and performance improvement (QA/QAPI) plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. Specifically, the quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) program committee failed to identify and address concerns related to significant medications errors that rose to the level of immediate jeopardy and residents were provided respect and dignity by staff that caused a pattern of psychosocial harm. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee policy and procedure, revised January 2018, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 8/8/23 at 2:30 p.m. It revealed, in pertinent part, Purpose: to evaluate facility quality indicators, identify quality issues, develop corrective action plans and evaluate any action plans for continuous quality improvement. Any concerns, trends or clusters identified should be listed on the QA Concerns…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to prevent an accident for one (#12) of six residents out of 22 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure certified nurse aide (CNA) #4 transferred Resident #12 appropriately, which resulted in a fall for the resident.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Fall Risk Assessment and Management policy, revised 9/24/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 10/8/25 at 3:00 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, The nursing staff, in conjunction with the attending physician, consultant pharmacist, therapy staff, and others, will seek to identify and document resident risk factors for falls and establish a resident-centered falls prevention plan based on relevant assessment information. Identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling.II. Resident #12A. Resident statusResident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#4 and #2) of three residents reviewed for abuse were kept free from sexual abuse out of five sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Protect Resident #4 from sexual abuse by Resident #3; and, -Protect Resident #2 from sexual abuse by Resident #3. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse policy, dated 1/30/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/23/25 at 4:00 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to maintain an environment free of abuse and neglect. The resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. Identifying physical or psychosocial indicators of abuse (including injuries from an unknown source), neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property from situations of verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse. The distribution of staff on each shift in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, distributed and served under sanitary conditions in five of five nourishment refrigerators. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure safe and appropriate storage of food items in the nourishment refrigerators. Findings include: I. Professional reference The Colorado Retail Food Establishment Regulations, (3/16/24), retrieved on 1/21/25, read in pertinent part, Ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 41 degrees fahrenheit (F) or less for a maximum of seven days. The day of preparation shall be counted as day one. The day or date marked by the food establishment may not exceed a manufacturer's use-by date if the manufacturer determined the use-by date based on food safety. (Chapter 3-28). The Hormel Handling Information product guide, (2025), retrieved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure six (#98, #16, #127, #106, #116 and #67) of 33 residents reviewed for abuse out of 53 sample residents were free from abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Prevent resident to resident physical abuse between Resident #98 and Resident #16, who had a history of physically and verbally aggressive behaviors towards other residents and staff; -Protect Resident #67 from physical abuse from Resident #127; -Protect Resident #106 from physical abuse from Resident #127; and, -Prevent a resident to resident physical abuse altercation between Resident #116 and Resident #127. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse Prevention policy and procedure, revised 12/17/18, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/13/25 at 1:10 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Residents will not be subjected to abuse by anyone including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff or other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement their policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling and consumption on two of three floors. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure safe and appropriate storage of food items in resident's personal refrigerators. Findings include: I. Professional reference The Colorado Retail Food Establishment Regulations, (3/16/24), retrieved on 1/21/25 read in pertinent part: Ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or less for a maximum of seven days. The day of preparation shall be counted as day one. The day or date marked by the food establishment may not exceed a manufacturer's use-by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide training to their staff that at a minimum educates staff on activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property as set forth, procedures for reporting incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation of resident property and resident dementia abuse prevention. Specifically the facility failed to: -Provide annual resident abuse prevention training/education to 46 out of 212 staff members; and, -Provide annual dementia management education/training for 42 out of 212 staff members. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse Prevention policy and procedure, revised 12/17/18 was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/13/25 at 1:10 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to maintain an environment free of abuse and neglect. The resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. Residents will not be subjected to abuse by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure care for residents in a manager and in an environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respect, in full recognition of his or her individuality for one of four residents out of 53 sample residents reviewed for respect and dignity. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided privacy while using the restroom. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #7, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the January 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included schizophrenia, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and history of falls. The 12/10/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15. He was dependent on total assistance from staff for toileting hygiene, transfers, and lower body dressing. He needed substantial to maximal assistance with bed mobility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to honor a resident's choice for laundry services, for one (#113) out of 33 residents reviewed out of 53 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #113's laundry was consistently saved and stored for his wife to launder due to his multiple allergies. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The facility's Promoting/Maintaining Resident Self-Determination policy, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/16/25 at 10:53 a.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights by promoting and facilitating resident self-determination through support of resident choice. The facility will ensure that each resident has the opportunity to exercise his/her autonomy regarding those things that are important in his/her life such as interests and preferences. Policy compliance guidelines included: -All staff members involved in providing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure the minimum data set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the residents'status based on the criteria outlined in the resident assessment instrument (RAI) for one (#83) of 18 residents reviewed out of 53 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #83's MDS accurately indicated the resident was receiving hospice services. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Documentation of Medical Record policy and procedure, undated, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/16/25 at 1:47 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Each resident's medical record shall contain an accurate representation of the actual experiences of the resident and include enough information to provide a picture of the resident's progress through complete, accurate, and timely documentation. Licensed staff and interdisciplinary team members shall document all assessments, observations, and services provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#45 and and #95) of five residents who required respiratory care received the care consistent with professional standards of practice out of 53 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Implement a routine cleaning schedule for the care of Resident #45's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine; -Ensure a care plan was in place and implemented for Resident #45's CPAP machine to include route of administration, oxygen supplementation, storage, cleaning and machine settings; and, -Ensure a functional continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine was available, cleansed, stored, and maintained for Resident #45 and Resident #95. Findings include: I. Professional reference The Legionella Toolkit (12/26/24) retrieved on 1/22/25 from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) https://www.cdc.gov/control-legionella/php/toolkit/control-toolkit.html. It read in pertinent part, In the absence of control,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a consent and a safety bed rail evaluation was in place for one (#151) of five residents with bed rails out of 53 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure a signed consent was obtained from Resident #151 or the resident's representative prior to the initiation of side rails; -Ensure a physical therapy or occupational therapy (PT/OT) safety evaluation was conducted for Resident #151 prior to the use of half bed rails on a new bed; -Ensure the least restrictive alternatives were tried and documented prior to the use of half rails; and, -Ensure a physician's order was obtained for Resident #151 prior to the use of bed rails. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2023), Recommendations for Health Care Providers Using Adult Portable Bed Rails, retrieved on 1/22/25 from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received food and fluids prepared in a form designed to meet his or her needs in one of five dining rooms. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents who were prescribed mechanically altered diets had food prepared according to the resident's diet orders of mechanical soft as indicated on their meal tray cards. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Therapeutic Diet Orders policy, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/16/25 at 4:55 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The facility provides all residents with foods in the appropriate form and/or the appropriate nutritive content as prescribed by a physician, and/or assessed by the interdisciplinary team to support the resident's treatment/plan of care, in accordance with his/her goals and preferences. A mechanically altered diet is one in which the texture or consistency of food is altered to facilitate oral intake. Examples include soft solids, pureed foods, ground meat, and thickened…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurately documented medical records for one (#114) of four residents out of 53 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #114's wound orders and treatment records were accurate. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Documentation of Medical Record policy, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/16/25 at 4:30 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Licensed staff and interdisciplinary team members shall document all assessments, observations and services provided in the resident's medical record in accordance with state law and facility policy. Documentation may be performed manually or as per the facility's specific electronic medical record software program. Principles of documentation include but are not limited to: Documentation shall be factual, objective and resident centered; documentation shall be accurate, relevant and complete, containing sufficient details about the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure the residents received the care and services they required per their comprehensive plans of care, to achieve and maintain their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility failed to consistently provide adequate nursing staff given the acuity and diagnoses of the facility's population, resident census, and the residents' daily need for care and services. Cross-reference citations: -F677 for the failure to provide timely incontinence care and reposition to residents; -F686 for the failure to provide repositioning for residents with pressure injuries; -F689 for the failure to ensure two staff were utilized when transferring residents with mechanical lifts; and, -F692 for the failure to provide timely eating assistance and consistently provide fluids to residents between meals. Findings include: I. Resident census and conditions According to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in a sanitary manner. Specifically, the facility failed to have a system in place to monitor the internal temperature of the dishwasher to ensure the functioning of the dishwasher. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the Food and Drug Administration Food Code (2022) accessed on 8/16/23 from https://www.fda.gov/media/164194/download?attachment read in pertinent part, Water temperature is critical to sanitization in warewashing operations. This is particularly true if the sanitizer being used is hot water. A temperature measuring device is essential to monitor manual warewashing and ensure sanitization. Effective mechanical hot water sanitization occurs when the surface temperatures of utensils passing through the warewashing machine meet or exceed the required 160°F (Fahrenheit). Parameters such as water temperature, rinse pressure, and time determine whether the appropriate surface temperature is achieved. Although the Food Code requires integral temperature measuring devices and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environments in multiple areas of the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms and facility hallways. Findings include: I. Initial observations The following was observed during the initial walkthrough of entering the facility on [DATE] at 9:00 a.m. until [DATE] at 4:00 p.m. The third floor memory care was observed to have bugs (deceased ) in multiple ceiling light fixtures throughout the unit. room [ROOM NUMBER] and #17: The window blinds were observed to be broken, bent and missing. room [ROOM NUMBER]: The electrical outlet on wall behind head of bed was observed to be dislodged from wall and unusable. room [ROOM NUMBER]: Multiple holes and tears, ranging from approximately one inch to four inches were observed in the screen to the window. room [ROOM NUMBER]: Two vertical holes, approximately three inches in length and half an inch wide were observed in the wall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure seven (#19, #69, #90, #92, #25, #98 and #75) residents were provided prompt efforts by the facility to follow up on grievances out of 71 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure grievances were followed up timely with a resolution in regards to missing property. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Complaints and Grievances policy, revised 2/8/19, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/26/23 at 11:03 p.m. It read in pertinent part This facility encourages and requests that staff, residents, families, visitors, express their concerns, complaints and grievances. The facility will review, investigate and respond to all such concerns. A resident, his or her representative, family member, visitor or advocate may file a verbal or written grievance or complaint concerning treatment, abuse, neglect, harassment, medical care, behavior of other residents or staff members, theft of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to consistently provide activities of daily living (ADL) support for three (#27, #98 and #106) of six dependent residents reviewed for ADL care out of 71 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Provide repositioning adjustments for Resident #27 and Resident #98 who were unable to reposition themselves; and, -Provide timely incontinence care for Resident #27 and Resident #106. Cross-reference F725: Lack of sufficient staffing to meet residents' needs for care and services Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedures A turning and repositioning document not dated or titled as a policy was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/26/23 at 11:05 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Evaluate bed mobility and develop a turning schedule based on identified risk. Individualized positioning regime and repositioning schedule must be documented and displayed. If the patient is able to make large body movements easily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#78, #89 and #127) of five out of 71 sample residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #78 did not receive another resident's medications; -Ensure Resident #89 was transferred with a mechanical lift according to professional standards of practice; and, -Ensure cleaning chemicals were not left in Resident #127's room unsecured. Findings include: I. Resident #78 A. Resident status Resident #78, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), the diagnoses included hypertension and depression. The 6/19/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status score of 14 out of 15. She was independent with all activities of daily living. B. Resident interview and observations Resident #78 was interviewed on 7/19/23 at 3:34 p.m. She said the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-08 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure certified nurse aides (CNAs) received 12 hours of training per year for seven (CNA #20, CNA #21, CNA #22, CNA #23, CNA #7, CNA #24, and CNA #25) out of 49 CNAs. Specifically, the facility failed to provide 12 hour training for CNA #20, CNA #21, CNA #22, CNA #23, CNA #7, CNA #24 and CNA #25. Findings include: I. Record review The facility was unable to provide documentation CNA #20 (hire date of 1/11/19) , CNA #21 (hire date of 8/22/22), CNA #22 (hire date of 6/6/17), CNA #23 (hire date of 8/1/19), CNA #7 (hire date of 1/21/22), CNA #24 (hire date of 9/15/2020) and CNA #25 (hire date of 9/29/22) had completed 12 hours of training during the survey process. II. Staff interview The infection preventionist (IP) interviewed on 8/8/23 at 2:10 p.m. He said the system they use for tracking training records was through a computer based program. He said he had his own tracking spreadsheet for education. He said he did not have a list of mandatory training for the CNAs to complete. He said he would look at the list of classes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure three out of four medication refrigerators stored narcotic, non-narcotic medications and biologicals in accordance with accepted professional standards. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were in a locked storage area that was permanently secured to the refrigerator. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Medication Storage policy was requested from the director of nursing (DON) on 7/25/23 but was not provided. II. Observations 7/25/23 -At 10:34 a.m. the third floor medication room medication refrigerator was observed with licensed practical nurse (LPN) #4. The refrigerator was not locked and it contained a locked box to hold controlled medications needing refrigeration that could be picked up and removed from the refrigerator. The narcotic locked box was not permanently affixed to the refrigerator. The nurse confirmed the controlled substance locked box inside of the refrigerator contained Lorazepam. -At 10:50 a.m. the second floor medication room medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-08 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews; the facility failed to provide food that accommodated resident preferences for four (#13, #78, #79 and #86) of four residents out of 71 sample residents. Specifically the facility failed to offer food choices according to resident preferences for Residents #13, #78, #79 and #86. Findings include: I. Observations and record review On 7/25/23 the noon kitchen line was observed continuously from 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. The trays were prepared using a resident list, which had the resident's preferences (likes and dislikes) and what the resident wanted to eat for their meal. At approximately 12:30 p.m. Resident #13 was served half of a serving of carrots. -Tray card for Resident #13 indicated that the resident disliked carrots. At approximately 12:30 p.m. Resident #78 was served a full serving of carrots. -Tray card for Resident #78 indicated that the resident disliked carrots. At approximately 12:30 p.m. Resident #79 was served gravy. -Tray card for Resident #79 indicated that the resident disliked gravy. At approximately 12:30 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Housekeeping staff engaged in appropriate infection control practices when cleaning a resident room; -Residents were provided with proper hand hygiene prior to meals; -Proper hand hygiene was conducted during medication pass; and, -Shared equipment was consistently sanitized between resident uses. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure A. The Infection Control policy and procedure manual, revised August 2015, was received by the administrator in training (AIT) on 7/26/23. It read in pertinent parts: This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. All personnel shall be trained and regularly in-serviced on the importance of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0574 — isolatedThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received notices orally and in writing which included a written description of their legal rights. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Include the email address of the State Survey Agency so a resident may file a care complaint; and, -Post the information in a manner accessible and understandable to all residents. Findings include: I. Resident group interview The group interview was conducted on 7/24/23 at 10:36 p.m. with five residents (#10, #68, #91 #104 and #105) identified by assessment and the facility as interviewable. All five residents said they did not know they could file a complaint with the State Agency and they did not know where the facility posted information in regard to pertinent State Agencies' contact information and it was not reviewed in the resident council meeting. III. Staff interviews and observation On 7/19/23 at 10:46 a.m. observation of the mandatory posting for the State Agency was made on the third floor across from the unit manager's office. An eight inch by 11 inch paper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to keep two residents (#108 and #133) free from resident to resident physical abuse of two residents reviewed out of 71 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure there was an effective plan to monitor, or provide increased oversight and effective interventions to protect, Residents #108 and #133 from Resident #409's behavior. Resident #409 physically abused two residents on 7/9/23. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse, Neglect, & Exploitation Prevention policy and procedure, revised 12/17/18, documented in pertinent part: It is the policy of this facility to maintain an environment free of abuse and neglect. The resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. Residents will not be subjected to abuse by anyone including, but not limited to, facilities staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff or other agencies serving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide written information regarding the facility's bed-hold policy to a resident's representative for one (#409) resident reviewed for discharge out of 71 sample residents. Specifically, the the facility failed to provide Resident #409's representative with a written notice of the bed hold policy when he was transferred to the hospital. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #409, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE] and discharged to hospital on 7/9/23. According to the July 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), the diagnoses included dementia with other behavioral disturbances. The 7/7/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status score of four out of 15. He required extensive assistance for transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. II. Record review The 7/9/23 nursing progress note revealed Resident #409 was sent to the emergency room to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to allow a resident to return to the facility after going to the hospital for one (#409) of one resident reviewed for discharge out of 71 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to assess Resident #409 when he went to the hospital to be stabilized to return to the facility. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Involuntary Discharge policy and procedure, revised 2/14/19, was provided by the administrator in training (AIT) on 7/26/23. It read in pertinent part, To assure residents will be transferred or discharged only for the resident's welfare, the resident's needs cannot be met in the facility, the resident's health has improved sufficiently so the resident no longer needs the services provided by the facility, the health and safety of individuals in the facility are endangered or for non-payment. If the resident is being transferred due to the resident being a danger to self or others, there must be documentation to show…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two of three residents (#41 and #136) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary care and services to maintain their abilities in ADLs out of 71 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide language communication tools in order for Resident #41 and #136 to effectively communicate their needs, requests, and opinions, as well as to participate in social conversation. Findings include: I. Resident #41 A. Resident status Resident #41, over the age of 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2023 Computerized Physician Orders (CPO), the resident's diagnoses included unspecified dementia, of unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. The June 2023 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident with severe cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status score of four out of 15. She required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for one (#69) of two residents out of 71 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to offer and provide activity programs for Resident #69 to meet her activity needs. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Federal Resident Right and Facility Responsibilities document, not dated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/26/23 at 11:00 p.m. It read in pertinent part: The resident has a right to choose activities, schedules (including sleeping and waking times), health care and provider of health care services consistent with his or her interests, assessments, plan of care and other applicable provisions of this part. II. Resident status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (#7) out of 71 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #7, who was diagnosed with diabetes, had her fingernails cut by a licensed nurse. Resident #7 sustained a laceration on her finger when the certified nurse aide (CNA) cut her nails. Findings include: I. Resident #7 status Resident #7, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), the diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus and Parkinson's disease. The 5/15/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status score of 15 out of 15. She required extensive assistance of two people with bed mobility, transfers, toileting and extensive assistance of one person with dressing and personal hygiene. A. Resident interview Resident #7 was interviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services to prevent pressure injuries from occurring for two (#23 and #85) of two residents in a sample of 71 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement or plan interventions to reduce pressure injury risk factors for Resident #23 and #85, both of whom had been identified at high risk for pressure injuries. Cross-reference F725: Lack of sufficient staffing to meet residents' needs for care and services Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) Pressure Injury Stages, the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel - NPIAP web. (2/4/18) accessed 8/2/23 from http://www.npiap.org/resources/educationaland-clinical-resources/npuap-pressure-injury-stages. read in pertinent part: A pressure injury is localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue, usually over a bony prominence as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#130 and #92) of three out of 71 sample residents received the care and services necessary to meet their nutrition needs and to maintain their highest level of physical well-being. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #130 received assistance to meet her nutrition and hydration needs; and, -Ensure Resident #92 received sufficient hydration. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure A. The Hydration policy and procedure, revised January 2020, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 7/25/23 at 6:30 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Purpose: to identify residents at risk for dehydration. To evaluate the fluid requirement of each resident. To identify risk factors which lead to dehydration and develop an appropriate preventative care plan. To provide sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health. B. The Facility Nutrition Program policy and procedure, revised April 2007, was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#108) resident who required respiratory care received the care consistent with professional standards of practice out of 71 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a portable oxygen concentrator was in working condition for Resident #108. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #108, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), the diagnoses included dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), emphysema (lung disease that causes breathlessness) and anxiety. The 6/16/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status score of five out of 15. She required extensive assistance from one staff member for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. She required oxygen therapy. II. Observations and interviews On 7/24/23 at 12:34 p.m. certified nurse aide (CNA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to develop and implement an antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for one (#143) resident reviewed for antibiotic stewardship out of 71 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to thoroughly assess and document clinical signs and symptoms of an infection to ensure the criteria of the infection was met prior to the administration of an antibiotic for Residents #143. Findings include: I. Professional reference The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2019) The Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes APPENDIX B: Measures of Antibiotic Prescribing, Use and Outcomes, retrieved 7/27/23 https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/core-elements/pdfs/core-elements-antibiotic-stewardship-appendix-a-508.pdf. It read in pertinent part, Incomplete assessment and documentation of a resident's clinical status, physical exam or laboratory findings at the time a resident is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure over-the-counter medications were secured for 1 (Resident #115) of 8 sampled residents who resided on the third floor. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled, Bedside Storage of Medications Self Administration of Drugs, revised 03/14/2018, revealed, Purpose: To provide a safe environment for self-administration of drugs .Procedure: .2. Assess the resident's ability to self-administer medications if the resident so chooses by completing the Self-Administration Pretest .5. Storage of the medications should de only in lockable drawers, cabinets or boxes to prevent access by other residents. A review of the admission Record revealed Resident #115 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the resident scored a 10 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$10,358 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-10-08
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARLENE CHILDREN'S TRUSTS A & GR | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2016 |
| ARLENE CHILDREN'S TRUSTS A & NJ | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/10/2023 |
| LJ1115 LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/30/2021 |
| TERRAPIN LIMITED | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/30/2021 |
| MANN, JOSEPH | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/10/2023 |
| DOUGHERTY, JONATHAN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/26/2020 |
| MANN, AARON | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/26/2020 |
| DONEGAN, CAITLYN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/15/2024 |
| FRASER, MALCOLM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2012 |
| VIGIL, CHRISTINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/10/2025 |
| JL LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065379. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.