No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Denver North Care Center

2201 N Downing St, Denver, CO 80205 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 82 certified beds · (303) 861-4825 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (303) 861-4825 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Feb 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1375 E 19th Ave · (303) 812-4442 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1375 E 20th Ave 1 · (303) 764-4669 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Sun Market<0.1 mi
2201 N Lafayette St · (303) 832-7370 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.5%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.8%4.7%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.4%8.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.2%3.4%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.7%13.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.9%11.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.4%94.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.5%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.3%21.2%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table33.9%20.0%17.1%worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.51
RN hours/ resident / day
0.80
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.59
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.89
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
35.2%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 77.5 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.89 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.59 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.01 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-18)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-09)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure:-Staff performed hand hygiene was conducted during dishwashing, and, -The food preparation area was clean and sanitary. Findings include: I. Failure to perform hand hygiene during dishwashingA. Professional referenceThe Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations (revised 3/16/24), was retrieved on 12/22/25. It revealed in pertinent part, Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms immediately before engaging in food preparation, including working with exposed food, clean equipment and utensils, and unwrapped single-service and single-use articles and: after touching bare human body parts other than clean hands and clean, exposed portions of arms; after using the toilet room; after coughing, sneezing, using a handkerchief or disposable tissue; using tobacco…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to remove medications and biologicals that were stored and labeled properly according to professional standards in two of two medication rooms, two of four medication carts and two of four vaccination refrigerators.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from the medication room, medication carts, vaccination refrigerator and medication refrigerator. Findings include:I. Professional referencesThe United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) Don't Be Tempted to Use ExpiredMedicines (revised 10/31/24), was retrieved on 12/29/25 from https://www.fda.gov/drugs/special-features/dont-be-tempted-use-expired-medicines. It read in pertinent part, Expired medical products can be less effective or risky due to a change in chemical composition or a decrease in strength. Certain expired medications are at risk of bacterial growth, and sub-potent antibiotics can fail to treat infections, leading to more serious illnesses and antibiotic resistance. Once the expiration date has passed, there is no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection on one of two units.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure housekeeping staff cleaned resident rooms in a hygienic manner;-Ensure housekeeping staff disinfected high-touch areas (call lights, door handles and handrails) when cleaning residents' rooms;-Ensure dwell times were followed during room cleaning;-Ensure staff wore personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing wound care to residents;-Ensure hand sanitizer was not expired;-Ensure staff performed hand hygiene while providing wound care to residents;-Ensure a clean field was created for wound care supplies; and,-Ensure staff performed hand hygiene during meals. Findings include: I. Failure to clean resident rooms in a hygienic manner and disinfect high-touch areas. A. Professional reference Assadian O,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide response, action and rationale to residents involved in group grievances. Specifically, the facility failed to effectively address, resolve and demonstrate the facility's response to grievances identified during resident council. Findings include:I. Resident group interviewFour alert and oriented residents (#12, #20, #36 and #71) who regularly attended the resident council meetings were interviewed on 12/18/25 at 11:25 a.m. The residents were identified as alert and oriented through facility and assessment.The group of residents said resident council meetings were not productive and the facility did not follow up on grievances brought up in the resident council meetings or provide resolution.Resident #20 said the residents reported that the staff noise levels on the evening shift woke up residents, but nothing had been done to address it. He said there was a lack of communication from administration as to what is done to resolve the grievances brought up. Resident #12 said if the facility was addressing the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to inform two (#14 and #27) of four residents reviewed for beneficiary notices and appeal rights out of 38 sample residents of changes in their services covered by Medicare in a timely manner.Specifically, the facility failed to provide written notification of a Medicare Non-Coverage letter (NOMNOC) to the resident's representative that Medicare-covered services were ending for Resident #14 and Resident #27 in a timely manner. Findings include:I. Resident #14A. Resident statusResident #14, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the December 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) and limitation of activities due to disability.According to the 9/16/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment, the resident had mild cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15. The resident's speech therapy start date was 8/4/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#24) of five residents were free from chemical restraints and were receiving the least restrictive approach for their needs out of 34 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure evidence was present that indicated Resident #24 had an increase in behaviors that warranted an increase in antipsychotic medication increases. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Psychopharmological policy, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/18/25 at 6:11 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part,The primary physician, psychiatrist (if applicable) and/or consultant pharmacist will monitor residents who are prescribed psychopharmacological drugs at least quarterly to assure these drugs are utilized according to State and Federal regulations and for the appropriate treatment of resident diagnosis.The interdisciplinary team which may consist of, but is not limited to, Nurse Managers, Social Services,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to incorporate recommendations from the preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) Level II determination and evaluation from the State Mental Health Agency in the case of residents with serious mental illness or a related condition for one (#39) of two residents reviewed for PASRR out of 38 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to arrange and incorporate recommendations from the PASRR Level II notice of determination (NOD) for Resident #39. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe PASRR policy, dated 9/26/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/18/25 at 6:11 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part,The social service staff are responsible for assuring that the specialized services needed or recommended by the PASRR- Level II are reviewed, implemented, and care planned within the facility within 14 days of admission. There should be a valid and detailed written explanation in cases when the PASRR -Level…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#24) of five residents received medically related social services out of 38 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Assist Resident #24 with obtaining a designated representative who could assist the resident with making choices; and,; -Ensure Resident #24 had the ability to give informed consent to psychoactive medications. Findings include:I. Resident #24A. Resident statusResident #24, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the December 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included anxiety, major depressive disorder and unspecified dementia. The 12/12/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #24 had severe cognitive impairments with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of five out of 15. The MDS assessment indicated the resident had a wander guard device but no other forms of restraints. B. Resident interviewResident #24 was interviewed on 12/16/25 at 2:17 p.m. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided adequate hydration for one (#11) of two residents reviewed for hydration out of 38 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide drinks during meal time and provide fluids throughout the day for Resident #11. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedureThe Hydration policy, dated 2/29/24, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/18/25 at 6:11 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Residents are provided with sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health. Residents identified at risk for fluid volume deficit will be assessed timely and provided appropriate interventions to promote adequate hydration. Address resident's individual needs with respect to fluid intake. Initiate appropriate strategies and interventions to prevent dehydration.II. Resident #11A. Resident statusResident #11, age [AGE], was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#6 and #9) of three residents reviewed for abuse out of 11 sample residents were kept free from abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to protect Resident #6 and Resident #9 from physical and verbal abuse from Resident #7. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse policy, dated 5/3/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/11/25 at 5:55 pm. It read in pertinent part, The facility does not condone resident abuse and shall take every precaution possible to prevent resident abuse by anyone, including other residents. Residents have the right to be free from abuse. Providing a safe environment for the resident is one of the most basic and essential duties of our facility. Identification of abuse shall be the responsibility of every employee. Residents at risk for abusive situations are identified and appropriate care plans are developed. If a resident experiences a behavior change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for one (#1) of two residents reviewed out of 11 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement person centered interventions to address Resident #1's pattern of escalating behaviors. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Behavior Monitoring policy, dated 2/29/24, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/11/25 at 4:23 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The purpose of behavior monitoring is to establish an accurate pattern of resident targeted behaviors as determined by the resident's history, evaluation, assessment. The goal is to determine appropriate behavior interventions such as counseling, behavior management plan including non-pharmacological interventions, and psychoactive medication management. When a resident displays targeted and/or inappropriate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and served under sanitary conditions in one kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Cutting boards were free from deep scratches and stains; -Frozen food thawing process was followed; and, -Beard restraints were worn in kitchen areas while preparing food. Findings include: I. Cutting boards A. Professional reference According to the State Board of Health Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations (updated 1/1/19), page 132, retrieved 1/16/24 from https://cdphe.colorado.gov/environment/food-regulations, Cutting surfaces that are scratched and scored must be resurfaced so as to be easily cleaned, or be discarded when these surfaces can no longer be effectively cleaned and sanitized. B. Observation The initial kitchen tour conducted on 1/3/24 at 8:29 a.m. revealed five large cutting boards and the cutting board on the serving line. There was one green, one blue, one red, one large white, and one yellow cutting board. All cutting boards were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable environment for residents in 14 of 40 resident rooms in six hallways. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure walls, floors, baseboards, doors and ceilings were properly maintained and rooms were free of trash and floors deep cleaned. Findings include: I. Initial observations Observations of the resident living environment were conducted on 1/8/24 at 9:18 a.m. revealed: room [ROOM NUMBER]: The wall next to the resident's bed had sticker residue from four large picture adhesive tape on the wall. The wood chair molding was missing a section approximately seven inches long by four inches wide. The closet door was off the rails and leaning against the wall. The floors had trash and debris underneath the resident's bed. The edges of the whole room and under the baseboard heater had a large build of dirt. The transition strip at the entrance door was missing which had approximately a one-fourth inch lip.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure five (#56, #34, #3, #45 and #128) of six residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications out of 27 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Implement effective individualized behavior monitoring in the medical record and follow physician orders to determine the efficacy of psychoactive medications for Residents #56, #34, #3 and #128; -Track behaviors of sexual aggression for Resident #128; and, -Update behavior tracking to reflect an increase in an antipsychotic medication for Resident #45. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Behavior Monitoring policy, dated 3/10/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/8/24 at 8:42 a.m. It read in pertinent part: Specific behavior(s) documentation will be utilized to monitor residents and behaviors. Identify the potential cause of the behavior(s), Attempt to eliminate or decrease the behavior(s) through interventions, Document the specific and observable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a backflow prevention device was installed on the hand held shower in the shower on the 100 hall, increasing the risk of contamination to the facility's main water supply. Findings include: I. Observation Observations of the resident living environment conducted on 1/8/24 at 9:18 a.m. revealed: The hand held shower head in the 100 hall shower room did not have a backflow prevention valve on it. The hand held shower was long enough to sit on the side on the floor next to the drain. There was visible standing water at the base of the shower pan. II. Staff interview The maintenance supervisor (MS) was interviewed on 1/9/24 at 9:44 a.m. He said he was familiar with the backflow valve protocol. The MS stated the hand held shower should have a backflow prevention valve on. He said he would install one immediately.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was being screened for a mental disorder prior to admission or that residents identified with a mental disorder were evaluated to receive care and services in the most integrated setting to meet their needs for one (#9) of four residents reviewed out of 27 sample residents. Specifically, the failed failed to: -Notify the State Mental Health Agency Resident #9 had exceeded the 60 day convalescent preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) period; and, -Submit a new PASRR to the State Mental Health Agency for Resident #9 to determine if a level II evaluation was needed. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The PASRR (Pre-admission Screen and Resident Review) policy, dated [DATE], was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on [DATE]. It revealed in pertinent part, Provisional Approval: Provisional approvals permit nursing facilities (NF) to accept a resident without a full level II evaluation (mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the state mental health agency promptly after a significant change in the mental condition of two (#45 and #128) of five residents out of 27 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Notify the State Mental Health Agency of Resident #128 necessity for inpatient psychiatric hospitalizations; and, -Notify the State Mental Health Agency of Resident #45's suicide attempt and physical aggression towards others. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The PASRR (Pre-admission Screen and Resident Review) policy, dated 9/26/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/8/24. It revealed in pertinent part, If a resident's psychiatric status changes after admission, the social services staff are responsible for contacting the State Mental Health Agency via completion and submission of a PASRR level I screen and indicate the reason for referral as a change in mental health status or psychiatric diagnosis. Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#3) of six residents reviewed for medication administration received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice out of of 27 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #3 was not administered an expired inhaler as identified by the manufacturer's directions. Findings include: I. Professional references According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) website, retrieved on 1/18/24 from https://www.cdc.gov/wtc/prescriptionsafety.html#:~:text=You%20should%20dispose%20of%20any,or%20misusing%20the%20medication%20intentionally. included the following recommendations, You should dispose of any unused or expired prescription medicine as soon as possible. Timely disposal of prescription medicine can reduce the risk of others taking the medication accidentally or misusing the medication intentionally. According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website, retrieved on 1/18/24 from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) for one (#3) of two residents reviewed for ADLs out of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide supervision, oversight, encouragement and cueing with personal hygiene for Resident #3. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #3, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the January 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder bipolar type and major depressive disorder recurrent. The 7/28/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment documented the resident was cognitively impaired with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of eight out of 15. The resident required supervision to one person assistance with personal hygiene and dressing. The assessment documented no behaviors of refusals of care. II. Observations and interview On 1/3/24 at 10:05…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#60, #25 and #3) out of 27 sample residents remained free of accident hazards and received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Assess Resident #60 and #25's bolstered mattresses to ensure they remained free of accident hazards; and, -Provide supervision to Resident #3, who was a supervised smoker. Findings include: I. Resident #60 A. Resident status Resident #60, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the January 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included dementia, depression and chronic systolic congestive heart failure. According to the 11/22/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment, the resident had no cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. The resident had verbal behaviors toward others. The MDS revealed the resident had no falls since admission. B. Observations From 1/3/24 to 1/8/24 from 8:00 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for one (#33 and #62) of three residents reviewed for the use of supplemental oxygen of 27 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Have an oxygen order in place for an individual requiring supplemental oxygen to include correct liter flow for Resident #33; and, -Ensure oxygen was provided as ordered for Resident #62. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Oxygen policy, dated 4/14/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/8/24 at 11:51 a.m., included, Oxygen is administered under orders of a physician, except in the case of an emergency. In such cases, oxygen is administered and orders for oxygen are obtained as soon as practicable when the situation is under control. Staff shall document the initial and ongoing assessment of the resident's condition warranting oxygen and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#45) of three residents diagnosed with a mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty received appropriate treatment and services to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial wellbeing out of 27 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #45 who expressed suicidal ideations was assessed and provided psychosocial support. Findings include: I. Resident #45 A. Resident status Resident #45, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the January 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), the diagnoses included schizophrenia. The 10/9/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. The mood assessment showed the resident denied any symptoms of depression. B. Resident observation and interview On 1/3/24 at 10:00 a.m. the resident was interviewed in his room. He said he did not remember the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-15 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespread
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to test residents, facility staff, and individuals providing services under arrangement and volunteers, for COVID-19. This had the potential to affect all 77 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Rapid point-of-care (POC) tests for COVID-19 were consistently conducted and documented on staff prior to the start of their shift, based on the facility's county positivity rate and outbreak status; and -Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing was conducted on all staff based on the county positivity rate and outbreak status. Cross reference F888 (COVID-19 staff vaccination matrix) and F880 (Infection control). Findings include: I. Professional references The healthcare community transmission levels for the facility's county of residence, obtained from https://covid19.colorado.gov/healthcare-providers/long-term-care-facilities/healthcare-community-transmission-levels, were reviewed for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY III. Resident #41 A. Resident status Resident #41, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the September2022 computerized physician orders (CPO), the diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, history of stroke, weakness on the right side, dysphagia (swallowing difficulty) and dementia with behavioral disturbance. The 8/4/22 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively impaired, he was rarely understood, and a brief interview for mental status score was not conducted. He required extensive assistance for most activities of daily living (ADLs). B. Record review The code status for Resident #41 was not listed on the front page of the electronic medical record. The binder at the nurses station contained a paper copy of the MOST form for Resident #41. The form read no CPR for the resident and only selective treatments. The form was not signed by the resident. It was signed by a proxy physician on 3/10/21. The resident did not have a copy of advanced directives in his chart, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure six (#47, #27, #30, #41, #43, and #50) of eleven residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications out of 36 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Identify and monitor targeted behaviors for psychotropic medications for Resident #47, #27, #30, #41, #43, and #50; and, -Ensure consents were obtained and contained black box warnings for the usage of psychotropic medications for Resident #47, #27, #30, #41 and #43. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Psychopharmacological Medications policy and procedure,revised 1/10/19, was provided by the regional clinical resource (RCR) on 9/15/22 at 3:25 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, A licensed nurse will review admission medication orders and ensure appropriate diagnosis for use of each medication from the primary care physician. If the information was not obtained prior to admission, the licensed nurse and/or social services director will make every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure food was labeled and dated; and, -Ensure holding temperatures of food were within the safe range. Findings include: I. Failure to ensure food was labeled and dated correctly A. Professional reference The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (2019) The Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations, https://drive.google.com/file/d/18-uo0wlxj9xvOoT6Ai4x6ZMYIiuu2v1G/view. It revealed in pertinent part, A date marking system that meets the criteria stated in (1) and (2) of this section may include: Using a method approved by the Department for refrigerated, ready-to eat potentially hazardous food (time/temperature control for safety food) that is frequently rewrapped, such as lunch meat or a roast, or for which date marking is impractical, such as soft serve mix or milk in a dispensing machine; Marking the date or day of preparation, with a procedure to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection for three out of four units. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure proper hand hygiene was offered to residents prior to meals; and, -Ensure proper wearing of masks for staff. Findings include: I. Hand hygiene A. Professional reference The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Hand Hygiene Guidance, reviewed 1/30/2020, retrieved on 9/20/22 from: https://www.cdc.gov/handhygiene/providers/guideline.html, read in pertinent part, The core infection prevention and control practices for safe care delivery in all healthcare settings recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) include the following strong recommendations for hand hygiene in healthcare settings. Healthcare personnel should use an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-15 · tag F0888 — pattern
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a COVID-19 staff vaccination process to address all facility staff, including agency staff who provided care, treatment and other services to facility and/or residents. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain the vaccination status of other outside providers. The facility did not have the vaccination status for all of the outside providers. The facility was unable to provide a listing of the vaccination status of all contracted providers/staff who enter the facility on a regular basis and provide direct care to residents. Cross-reference F886 (COVID-19 testing), and F880 (Infection control). Findings include: I. Record review Staff vaccination matrixes were provided by the facility. The vaccination matrix failed to ensure all staff and providers who provided resident care were listed on the vaccine matrix. -Review of the matrix provided by the facility failed to include medical providers, which included psychiatric physician (PSY) and two staff, one who scribed (SC) and a case…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure care for residents was provided in a manner and in an environment that maintained or enhanced the residents' dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality for two (#3 and #274) residents of five residents reviewed for dignity out of 36 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #3 had the right to a dignified existence and the ability to exercise self-determination by neglecting to support and honor the resident's status as a transgender female; and, -Assist Resident #274 with the organization of his personal items. Two weeks after admission, the resident's television (TV) was not properly mounted and he was not able to use it. In addition, he was not offered any linens for his mattress, and slept on top of the uncovered mattress. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Dignity policy, revised February 2021, was provided by the regional clinical resource (RCR) on 9/15/22. It read in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-15 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living for two (#41 and #275) of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living of 36 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Establish an effective communication system for Resident #41 in order to provide him with services; and, -Provide nail care to Resident #275. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting policy, revised in 2018, was provided by the regional clinical resource (RCR) on 9/15/22. It read in pertinent part, residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#274) out of 36 sample residents reviewed for fecal incontinence and constipation received appropriate treatment and services to maintain normal bowel function as much as possible. Specifically, the facility failed to follow bowel protocol for Resident #274 who was at risk for constipation. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The facility policy and procedure for Bowel and Bladder management were requested at the time of the survey. It was not provided prior to the exit on 9/15/22. II. Resident status Resident #274, age [AGE], was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the 9/3/22 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), weight loss, chronic kidney disease, gastro-esophogeal reflux disease (GERD), anxiety, nausea, shortness of breath, malignant rectal cancer, malignant bladder cancer, and insomnia. The MDS assessment was not completed for this resident. The 9/7/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to establish a communication process with the hospice provider, including how the communication would be documented between the facility and the hospice provider for one (#274) resident reviewed for hospice care and services out of 36 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice for the development, implementation and revision of the coordinated plan of care for Resident #274. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #274, age [AGE], was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the 9/3/22 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), weight loss, chronic kidney disease, gastro-esophogeal reflux disease (GERD), anxiety, nausea, shortness of breath, malignant rectal cancer, malignant bladder cancer, and insomnia. The MDS assessment was not completed for this resident. The 9/7/22 social services assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$662K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 93%Medicare 1%Other / private 6%

About 93% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $662K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$308per resident / day
operating cost
$9,364per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$298per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Colorado
$10,159/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,182/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,584/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065323. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next