No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Wellsprings Care Center

3636 S Pearl St, Englewood, CO 80113 · For profit - Corporation · 81 certified beds · (303) 761-1640 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
601 E Hampden Ave · (303) 744-7078 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
499 E Hampden Ave Ste 150
Grocery
Safeway0.3 mi
201 E Jefferson Ave · (303) 781-0463 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3750 S Clarkson St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
Evolve0.1 mi
3600 S Clarkson St · (720) 440-3531

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.0%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.9%4.7%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.5%8.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.8%3.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.4%13.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.9%11.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.2%94.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.3%21.2%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.2%20.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication8.0%1.6%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine13.8%75.6%79.4%worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.16U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 5.8–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.691.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.33
RN hours/ resident / day
0.89
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.71
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.92
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
55.4%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 70.6 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.92 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.07 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-11)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-14)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to protect three (#3, #5 and #7) out of three residents from physical abuse out of 11 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Protect Resident #3 from physical abuse by Resident #6; -Protect Resident #5 from physical abuse by Resident #6; and, -Protect Resident #7 from physical abuse by Resident #5.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse policy, dated 5/3/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/6/25 at approximately 5:00 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This includes freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraints not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. II. Incidents of physical abuse by Resident #6 toward Resident #3 on 12/12/25 and 12/14/25 A. Facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#9) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards received adequate supervision out of 11 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to assess, educate, and initiate care plan interventions for Resident #9.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Fall Management policy, 2/29/24, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/6/26 at 4:14 p.m. It read in pertinent part, A fall reduction program will be established and maintained, to assess all residents to determine their risk for falls. A plan of care will be implemented based on the resident's assessed needs. Research has shown that a structured fall reduction program can substantially reduce the rate of falls and related injuries in nursing facilities; however, falls may likely occur. Identifying risk factors, followed by timely and appropriate interventions, is the key to a successful program. Risk factors that are internal to the resident include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to protect one (#1) of three residents from misappropriation of property out of three sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to protect Resident #1 from misappropriation of property and exploitation by a facility employee.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Abuse policy and procedure, dated May 2023, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 11/5/25 at 4:10 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Purpose: The facility does not condone resident abuse and shall take every precaution possible to prevent resident abuse by anyone, including staff members, other residents, volunteers, and staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members, legal guardians, resident representative, sponsors, friends, or any other individuals. Intent: Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions in the main kitchen.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure:-Perishable foods were discarded after the date of expiration; and, -Perishable foods were labeled and dated.Findings include:I. Professional reference According to the Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations (effective 3/16/24) retrieved 9/16/25A date marking system that meets the criteria using a method approved by the Department for refrigerated, ready-to-eat, potentially hazardous food (time/temperature control for safety food) that is frequently re-wrapped, such as lunch meat or a roast. Marking the date or day of preparation with a procedure to discard the food on or before the last date or day by which the food must be consumed on the premises. Marking the date or day the original container is opened in a food establishment with a procedure to discard the food on or before the last date or day by which the food must be consumed on the premises. Using calendar dates,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-11 · tag F0571 — pattern
    Limit the charges against residents' personal funds for items or services for which payment is made under Medicare or Medicaid.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were not responsible to purchase items or services for which payment was made under Medicaid or Medicare. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure routine hygiene items such as hand soap in the resident rooms were provided at no cost to the residents.I. Facility admission agreementThe facility's admission agreement, dated 2018, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/8/25 at 10:41 a.m. It read in pertinent part,Services (items) covered under Medicaid/Medicare: Routine personal hygiene items and services, as needed, to meet your needs, including, but not limited to: hygiene supplies, comb, brush, soap, and disinfecting soaps or specialized cleansing agents when indicated to treat special skin.II. ObservationsOn 9/9/25 at 10:03 a.m. room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed. There was no bar soap or liquid hand soap in the resident bathroom. On 9/09/25 at 10:05 a.m. room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed. There was no bar soap or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable and homelike environment for residents in two of four hallways and two of four shower rooms.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure Resident #4's window blinds and walls were cleaned and maintained and the resident's bed was in good condition;-Ensure bath towels were available for resident use in shower rooms; and,-Ensure residents' rooms were free from debris and odors and appropriate personal hygiene items were available. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Cleaning and Disinfecting Residents' Rooms policy, revised August 2013, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/11/25 at 1:20 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Housekeeping surfaces (floors, tabletops) will be cleaned on a regular basis, when spills occur and when these surfaces are visibly soiled. Environmental surfaces will be disinfected (or cleaned) on a regular basis and when surfaces are visibly soiled.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of accidents and hazards for three (#48, #68 and #5) of four residents reviewed for accidents/hazards out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #48 and Resident #68 were re-assessed to determine if they were safe to smoke independently; -Ensure staff were consistently implementing the care planned fall interventions for Resident #5; and, -Ensure Resident #5's fall care plan was updated with all fall interventions.Findings include:I. Resident #48A. Resident statusResident #48, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the September 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included schizophrenia and a traumatic brain injury (TBI). The 6/4/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairments and was unable to participate in the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) assessment. A staff assessment for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease on three of four hallways.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were followed during a transfer for Resident #49, who had an indwelling medical device (Foley catheter); -Ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were followed during resident care for Resident #47, who had an indwelling medical device (enteral feeding tube); and,-Ensure staff performed hand hygiene consistently during medication administration for Resident #31, Resident #14 and Resident #24.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Infection Control and Surveillance policy, July 2023, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/8/25 at 1:53 p.m. It read in pertinent part, An infection prevention and control program (IPCP) is established and maintained to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure the first floor north shower gurney pad was smooth, cleanable, in good repair, and cleaned according to manufacturing instructions; and, -Ensure the residents' shower rooms were maintained in a safe, sanitary and working conditions. Findings include: I. Failure to ensure the shower gurney pad was maintained and cleaned per instructions A. Facility policy and procedure The Manual Cleaning Shower Bed policy and procedure, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/10/25 at 10:02 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Usage recommendation: Recommended for showering people who are unable to stand or sit in a chair. Cleaning instructions: Clean cushion, pipe and fittings with in-house disinfectant after each use. Wipe down casters after each use. Avoid using solvent based or abrasive cleaners. B.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#27 and #43) of six residents reviewed for abuse out of 39 sample residents were kept free from abuse. Specially, the facility failed to protect Resident #27 and Resident #43 from physical abuse by Resident #48.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse policy, dated 5/3/23, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/8/25 at 10:41 a.m. It read in pertinent part, If a resident experiences a behavior change resulting in aggression toward other residents, the community will implement interventions for protection of the alleged assailant and other residents. The facility conducts further assessment and arranges for appropriate psychiatric evaluation for further screening. The resident's care plan is revised to include new approaches to reduce or eliminate any further chance of abuse. Recommendations for appropriate intervention, up to and including hospitalization, can then be implemented. II. Incident of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify the state mental health agency promptly after a significant change in the resident's mental condition for one (#7) of four residents out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the state mental health agency authority of Resident #7's necessity for inpatient psychiatric hospitalization.Findings include:I. Facility Policy and ProcedureThe Pre-admission Screen and Resident Review (PASRR) policy, dated 9/26/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/11/25 at 9:15 a.m. It revealed in pertinent part, If a resident's psychiatric status changes after admission. The social services staff are responsible for contacting Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA - state mental health agency) coordinator via completion and submission of a PASRR level I screen and indicate the reason for referral as a change in mental health status or psychiatric diagnosis. Notification of changes are to be made within 10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent (%).Specifically, the facility had a medication error rate of 8%, or two errors out of 25 total opportunities for error.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Medication Administration policy, dated 8/4/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/10/25 at 10:02 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Resident medications are administered in an accurate, safe, timely, and sanitary manner. Verify the medication label against the medication administration record (MAR) for accuracy of drug frequency, duration, strength, and route. The nurse is responsible to read and follow precautionary or instructions on prescription labels. If the label and MAR are different and the container is not flagged indicating a change in directions or if there is any other reason to question the dosage or directions, the physician's orders are checked for the correct dosage schedule. Report any discrepancies to the pharmacy. Do not administer the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were properly stored, secured, and labeled in accordance with accepted professional standards in two of four medication carts.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure residents' medications were labeled and dated appropriately with the resident's name, the date the medication was opened and the expiration date, as applicable; and,-Ensure over-the-counter (OTC) medications stored in medication carts were not expired.Findings include:I. ObservationsOn [DATE] at 10:48 a.m. medication cart #1 on the first floor was observed with licensed practical nurse (LPN) #1. The following items were found:-There was an albuterol sulfate 90 microgram (mcg) inhaler stored in an appropriately labeled medication box; however, the inhaler inside the box was not labelled with the resident's name for Resident #2.-Resident #2's albuterol sulfate inhaler was labeled with a medication expiration date of [DATE].-There was a Breo ellipta 50/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received the required therapy services which were ordered by the physician for one (#74) of three residents reviewed for therapy services out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #74 received specialized rehabilitative services as ordered on admission to the facility, to maintain the resident's highest practicable level of physical, mental, functional and psycho-social well-being.Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to [NAME], D (2023) Tips for a Comprehensive Post-admission Medical Record Review, retrieved on on 9/18/25 from: https://www.aapacn.org/article/tips-for-a-comprehensive-post-admission-medical-record-review American Association of Post-Acute Care Nursing, Omissions and inaccuracies in the medical record can hinder resident quality of care. Omitting or incorrectly transcribing medications or treatments can lead to adverse outcomes due to incorrect dosage, missed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0923 — isolated
    Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate outside ventilation by means of windows, or mechanical ventilation for two out of four shower rooms. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure ventilation fan covers were kept clean and operational in the resident shower rooms. Findings include:A. Professional referenceAccording to the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, April 2021 retrieved on 9/19/25 from: https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/79150.pdf., Proper ventilation helps reduce the concentration of bioaerosols (bioaerosols consist of aerosols originated biologically such as metabolites, toxins, or fragments of microorganisms), which can be particularly important in nursing homes due to the presence of vulnerable adults. Good ventilation can improve the health and wellbeing of the residents by reducing infection risks and preventing respiratory issues. By ensuring proper ventilation, nursing homes can significantly enhance the safety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-24 · tag F0659 — pattern
    Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that services provided or arranged in accordance with the resident's plan of care were delivered by individuals who have the skills, experience and knowledge to do a particular task or activity for four (#2, #4, #6 and #7) of seven residents out of 11 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #2, Resident #5, Resident #6 and Resident #7's post fall assessments were completed timely by a qualified person and documented in the residents medical record. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Fall Management policy, dated 2/29/24, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/24/25 at 4:00 p.m. It read in pertinent part, All fall risk evaluation will be completed within the first 24 hours of admission and a baseline care plan will be initiated for residents to be at risk. If a resident experiences a fall with a head injury, the fall is unwitnessed, or the resident self-reports a fall,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, sanitary and comfortable homelike environment throughout the facility in three out of four hallways. Specifically the facility failed to: -Ensure resident rooms were clean and odor free; -Ensure the residents had clean bed linens and privacy curtains; -Ensure the dining room and common areas were clean; and, -Ensure the facility was free from institutional odors. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Homelike Environment policy, revised February 2021, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/4/25 at 12:24 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics included a clean, sanitary and orderly environment, clean bed and bath linens that are in good…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify the resident representative when there was a significant change in the resident's condition for two (#7 and #8) of three residents reviewed out of 12 sample residents. Specifically, for Resident #7 and Resident #8, the facility failed to: -Keep the resident's current designated representative's name and contact information updated in the resident's record; and, -Make additional attempts or try alternative methods to contact the representative when the representative was not reachable. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Change of Condition policy, dated 2/29/24, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/4/25 at 12:24 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The resident, attending physician and legal representative or interested family member are notified when changes in condition or certain events occur. Communication with the IDT (interdisciplinary team) and caregivers is also important to ensure that consistency and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#1, #2 and #5) of three residents reviewed for abuse out of 12 sample residents were kept free from abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #2 and Resident #5 were kept free from physical abuse from each other; and, -Ensure Resident #1 was kept free from physical abuse by Resident #2. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse policy and procedure, dated 5/3/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/4/22 at 12:24 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, The facility does not condone resident abuse and shall take every precaution possible to prevent resident abuse by anyone, including staff members, other residents, volunteers, and staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members, legal guardians, resident representative, sponsors, friends, or any other individuals. If a resident experiences a behavior change resulting in aggression toward other residents, the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, sanitary, and comfortable environment throughout the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure resident rooms were clean, sanitary and odor-free; -Ensure the resident common areas were clean and odor-free; -Ensure residents' bed sheets were changed regularly and when soiled; and, -Ensure residents had hand towels available for use in their rooms. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Safe and Homelike Environment policy, revised February 2021, was provided by the corporate nurse consultant (CNC) on 2/13/25 at 2:14 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The facility staff and management maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include a clean, sanitary and orderly environment. Clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition, and have pleasant natural scents. The facility staff and management minimizes, to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#12, #14 and #23) of five residents reviewed for abuse out of 23 sample residents were kept free from abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Prevent Resident #12 from being sexually abused by Resident #13; -Prevent Resident #14 and Resident #23 from being physically abused by Resident #13; and, -Implement a care plan focus to assess and monitor Resident #13 for inappropriate behavior when he had a known history of violent aggression and other inappropriate behaviors. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse Policy, revised 5/3/23, was provided by the corporate nurse consultant (CNC) on 2/13/25 at 2:14 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Community does not condone resident abuse and shall take every precaution possible to prevent resident abuse by anyone, including staff members, other residents, volunteers, and staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members, legal guardians, resident representative,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (#7) of one resident out of 23 sample residents was protected from exploitation and misappropriation of property. Specifically, the facility failed to prevent a staff member from taking $5,060 from Resident #7. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Staff Acceptance of Gifts, Gratuities and Payments policy, dated 2/2/17, was provided by the corporate nurse consultant (CNC) on 2/13/25 at 2:15 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Staff are not to accept or solicit gifts, including items such as cash, loans, gratuity, service, or promise of future employment. Offered gifts are to be politely and respectfully declined. This policy is not meant to apply when the gift is of nominal value of $5.00 or less. II. Resident #7 A. Resident status Resident #7, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the February 2025 computerized physician's orders (CPO), diagnoses included stroke (damage caused by blocked blood vessels in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure the resident's second floor smoking patio was free from debris and the fire blanket was visible; -Ensure the outdoor refuse area was free from debris and items were properly disposed of; and, -Ensure a resident's room was free of long standing stains on the floor. I. Facility policy and procedure The Homelike Environment policy, revised February 2021, was provided by the quality mentor (QM) on 12/4/24 at 12:30 p.m. The policy revealed in pertinent part, Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible. Staff provides person-centered care that emphasizes the residents' comfort, independence and personal needs and preferences. The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for one (#1) of six residents reviewed out of 11 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1, who was dependent on staff for bathing, received her scheduled showers. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure. The Activities of Daily Living policy, revised March 2018, was provided by the quality mentor (QM) on 12/4/24 at 11:20 a.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care). II. Resident status Resident #1, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#6) of one resident out of 11 sample residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #6 was weighed weekly per physician orders; and, -Ensure Resident #6's care plan was updated to include new weight monitoring interventions related to his diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and heart failure. I. Resident status Resident #6, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. According to the December 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), depression, atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), high blood pressure and heart failure. The 11/28/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. He needed set up assistance with showers and tub transfers, supervision…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary homelike environment for residents on three of four units. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure residents experienced a clean and sanitary homelike environment with living spaces free from odors, dirt, debris and soiled areas; and, -Ensure that mouse droppings were removed and the surfaces were properly sanitized from possible rodent contamination. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the Centers for Disease Control Controlling (CDC) Wild Rodent Infestations, (4/28/24), retrieved on 10/21/24 from https://www.cdc.gov/healthy-pets/rodent-control/index.html#:~:text=Rodents%2C%20such%20as%20rats%2C%20mice,Rodent%20bites, What to know: Rodents can carry many diseases that can spread directly or indirectly to people. Rodents, such as rats, mice, and chipmunks, are known to carry many diseases. These diseases can spread to people directly, through handling of rodents, contact with rodent droppings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, distributed and served under sanitary conditions in the kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff wore hair restraints to prevent hair from contacting food; -Ensure the freezer was within appropriate operating range to maintain frozen foods solid; -Ensure dry goods were stored in sealed containers to prevent rodents; -Ensure staff practiced appropriate hand hygiene and glove use when necessary during food preparation activities; and, -Ensure food in the nourishment refrigerator was dated. Findings include: I. Ensure staff wore hair restraints A. Professional reference The Colorado Retail Food Regulations, effective 1/1/19, were retrieved 2/15/24 from https://cdphe.colorado.gov/environment/food-regulations. It revealed in pertinent part, Food employees shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard restraints, and clothing that covers body hair, that are designed and worn to effectively keep their hair from contacting exposed food; clean…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-14 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse was properly disposed of and the dumpster lid was closed to prevent harborage to pests and insects. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure all dumpster lids were closed and not overflowing with garbage; and, -Ensure garbage was cleaned up around and under dumpsters. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Pest Control policy and procedure, last revised May 2008, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/14/19 at 4:05 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, The facility shall maintain an effective pest control program. Garbage and trash are not permitted to accumulate and are removed from the facility daily. Maintenance services assist, when appropriate and necessary, in providing pest control services. II. Observations On 2/12/24 at 9:34 a.m. the dumpster area was found to have one of the two lids open on the dumpsters.There were used gloves, used cups, rotisserie chicken, a bag of lettuce and plastic bags on the ground next to and behind the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection for two out of four units in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure high touch areas were cleaned appropriately by the housekeeping staff; -Ensure proper proper disinfectant times were utilized by staff; -Ensure housekeeping staff performed hand hygiene while cleaning resident rooms; -Ensure each resident was provided with hand hygiene prior to meals; -Ensure hand sanitizer dispensers were operational; and, -Ensure resident laundry was covered while being transported in the hallways. Findings include: I. Housekeeping failures A. Professional reference The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Environment Cleaning Procedures https://www.cdc.gov/hai/prevent/resource-limited/cleaning-procedures.html# retrieved on 2/15/24 read in pertinent part, High-Touch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure resident rooms, dining rooms, hallways, and the elevator were free from debris and food; -Ensure the dumpsters were closed at all times and the area was free from debris, food, and trash; -Ensure kitchen was free from mice droppings and dry storage was stored properly; and, -Ensure the entrance to the facility was free from extinguished cigarette butts disposed on the ground. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Homelike Environment policy, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator on 2/16/24 at 2:03 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The resident has the right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. Environment refers to any environment in the facility that is frequented by residents, including the residents' rooms, bathrooms, hallways, dining areas, lobby, outdoor patios,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure four residents (#27, #39, #212 and #6) of six residents reviewed for abuse were kept free from abuse out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Residents #27, #39, #212 and #6 were kept free from physical abuse from Resident #49. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Abuse policy, dated 5/3/23, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/12/24 at 2:02 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Communities does not condone resident abuse and shall take every precaution possible to prevent resident abuse by anyone, including staff members, other residents. Residents have the right to be free from abuse. Resident abuse was defined as the wilful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment of a resident resulting in physical harm or pain, mental anguish,deprivation of goods or services that were necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, or psychosocial well being.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent. Specifically, the facility had a medication error rate of 17.24%, which was five errors out of 29 opportunities for error. Findings include I. Professional reference According to [NAME], P.A., [NAME], A.G., et.al., Fundamentals of Nursing, 10 ed. (2020), E.[NAME], St. Louis Missouri, pp. 606-607. Take appropriate actions to ensure the patient receives medication as prescribed and within the times prescribed and in the appropriate environment. Professional Standards such as nursing scope and standards of practice apply to the activity of medication administration. To prevent medication errors, follow the seven rights of medication administration consistently every time you administer medications. Many medication errors can be linked in some way to an inconsistency in adhering to these seven rights: 1. The right medication 2. The right dose 3. The right patient 4. The right route…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide bed hold documentation for residents being discharged to the hospital for one (#27) of two residents reviewed for the bed hold policy out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide Resident #27 with an appropriate bed hold notification when being transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and 11/29/23. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Bed hold policy and procedure, dated 10/1/21, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/16/24 at 11:20 a.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to provide written information to the resident and/or the resident representative regarding bed hold policies prior to transferring a resident to the hospital or the resident goes on therapeutic leave. Bed-hold: holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident is absent from the facility for therapeutic leave or hospitalization. The facility will have a process in place to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#8) of four reviewed for dialysis care out of 37 sample residents received dialysis services consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to communicate with the dialysis center when the communication form was not completed. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Hemodialysis policy, dated 5/4/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/14/24 at 11:20 a.m. It read in pertinent part, The facility provides residents with safe, accurate, and appropriate care, assessments and interventions to improve outcomes in coordination/collaboration with the dialysis center. A dialysis communication record is initiated and sent to the dialysis center each appointment; ensure it is received upon return. II. Resident #8 Resident #8, age below 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the February 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included hypertensive heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were stored and labeled properly on one of four medication carts. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure insulin (medication used for blood glucose control) pens were labeled with resident name and open dates; -Ensure medications were not left unattended on the medication cart; -Ensure medications were disposed of properly; and, -Ensure medication carts were kept clean. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the Lantus glargine package insert, retrieved [DATE] from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/021081s076lbl.pdf, when not in use store in refrigerated temperatures of 36 to 46 degrees. When in use, it can be kept at room temperature for up to 28 days. According to the Humalin N kwikpen instructions for use, retrieved on [DATE] from: https://pi.lilly.com/us/HUMULIN-N-KWIKPEN-IFU.pdf, Throw away the Humulin N pen after 14 days even if it still has insulin in it. II.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation when Dietary Aide (DA) #1 continued to wash dishes using a low temperature dish machine without ensuring the proper sanitizer concentration. The facility further failed to maintain a log of refrigerator and freezer temperatures. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility who received food from the kitchen. Findings included: 1. A review of the facility's Warewashing policy, dated 05/2014 and revised 09/2017, revealed, The Dining Services staff will be knowledgeable in the proper technique for processing dirty dishware through the dish machine, and proper handling of sanitized dishware. The policy further revealed, Temperature and/or sanitizer concentration logs will be completed, as appropriate. A review of the October 2022 Dish Machine Log revealed DA #1 recorded a sanitizer concentration of 100 parts per million (ppm) for the morning of 10/31/2022. During a concurrent observation and interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, document review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to report an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse to the state survey agency (SSA) within two hours after the allegation was made for 1 (Resident #3) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. On 10/31/2022 at approximately 6:30 AM, Resident #3 alleged that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 yelled at the resident and made an inappropriate hand gesture toward the resident. The facility did not report the allegation to the SSA until 11:29 AM, approximately five hours after the resident made the allegation. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, The Elder Justice Act and Reporting Suspected Crimes Against Residents Policy and Procedures, dated 2017, revealed the purpose of the policy was, To facilitate efforts to prevent, detect, treat, intervene in, and prosecute elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation and to protect elders with diminished capacity while maximizing their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect 1 (Resident #3) of 4 residents from further potential abuse while an abuse allegation investigation was being conducted. On 10/31/2022, at approximately 7:43 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 sent Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 home after Resident #3 reported that CNA #1 yelled at the resident and made an inappropriate hand gesture by raising the middle finger. However, the facility allowed CNA #1 to return to work at 9:22 AM before an investigation was completed. Findings included: A review of the facility policy The Elder Justice Act and Reporting Suspected Crimes Against Residents Policy and Procedures, dated 2017, revealed the purpose of the policy/procedure was To facilitate efforts to prevent, detect, treat, intervene in, and prosecute elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation and to protect elders with diminished capacity while maximizing their autonomy and their right to be free of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WELLSPRINGS SNF HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 09/01/2024
RASKIN, CHAIMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
MOSKOWITZ, JAYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
VALLE, KARLAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
BEECAN HEALTH CO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
MONTOYA, LOURIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/20/2015
DERGANCE, JEANNAEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
KORETKE, MARYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 94%Medicare 2%Other / private 4%

About 94% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$307per resident / day
operating cost
$9,336per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$315per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Colorado
$10,159/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,182/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,584/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065208. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next