Crowley County Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 44 beds and averages 37.4 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.76 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2019-10-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to take timely and sufficient steps to implement interventions to prevent the development of pressure injuries, affecting one (#29) out of one resident reviewed for pressure injuries out of 29 sample residents. Resident #29 admitted to the facility with a stage 2 pressure ulcer to her left buttock and was identified as being at risk for pressure ulcer development related to multiple comorbidities including post-polio syndrome, adult failure to thrive, spinal stenosis, and fibromyalgia. Record review revealed Resident #29's pressure ulcer to her left buttock healed over three times. The facility failed to have a system in place to identify and review residents at risk for pressure ulcer development and pressure ulcer re-development. As a result, the facility failed to put appropriate interventions in place timely for Resident #29, which contributed to the development of a pressure ulcer. She developed a pressure ulcer to her coccyx which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2019-10-11 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an effective quality assurance program to identify and address facility compliance concerns was implemented, in order to facilitate improvement in the lives of nursing home residents, through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life, and resident safety. Specifically, the quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) program committee failed to: -Identify systemic issues in its management for residents at risk for pressure ulcers to ensure they were consistently reviewed and appropriate interventions implemented to prevent the redevelopment of pressure ulcers; -Ensure residents were reviewed consistently as an interdisciplinary team (IDT) to prevent unintended weight loss and activities of daily living (ADL) decline; -Perform proper hand hygiene prior to, during, and after wound care treatment; -Ensure clinical signs and symptoms (s/s) of an infection were identified and culture and sensitivity (C&S) were obtained prior to the start of an antibiotic; and -Ensure the dietary department followed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-02-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, functional and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure a backflow prevention device was installed on the hand held shower hose in the shower room on B hall, increasing the risk of contamination to the facility's main water supply; and, -Ensure necessary kitchen equipment was maintained in safe, sanitary and working condition. Findings include: I. Backflow prevention devices A. Professional references According to the Environmental Protection Agency's Distribution System Water Quality Protecting Water Quality through Cross-Connection Control and Backflow Prevention, October 2021 retrieved online 2/27/24 from: https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2021-12/ds-toolbox-fact-sheets_ccc.pdf, it read in pertinent part, Cross-connections are actual or potential connections between a potable water supply and non-potable water plumbing. Backflow is the unintended reversal of water flow through a cross-connection,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months and provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews for four of four certified nurse aides (CNAs) reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Provide inservice education plans based on the outcome of the performance reviews for CNA #2, #3, #4, and #5; and, -Ensure CNAs received 12 hours of training annually for CNA #2, #3 and #4. Findings include: I. Record review CNA #2 (hired 5/2/14) had a performance review on 7/11/23 with eight hours of training. CNA #3 (hired 1/5/22) had a performance review on 3/5/23 with 11 hours of training. CNA #4 (hired 4/16/21) had a performance review on 4/12/23 with 8.5 hours of training. CNA #5 (hired 1/31/23) had a performance review on 4/12/23. -None of theThe CNAs weredid not provided withhave an inservice education plans based on the outcome of their performance reviews. II. Interview The director of nursing (DON) was interviewed on 2/26/24 at 11:20 a.m. She said the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure in-service training for certified nurse aides (CNA) consisted of annual training for dementia management and/or annual abuse training for four of four CNAs reviewed. Specifically, the facility: -Failed to ensure CNAs #2, #3, #4, and #5 received annual dementia management training; and, -Failed to ensure CNAs #2, #3, and #4 received annual abuse training. Findings include: I. CNA training records review Four CNAs were reviewed for the annual required abuse and dementia management training. -Training records revealed four of the four CNAs did not have dementia training and three of the four CNAs did not have abuse training. CNA #2 was hired on 5/2/14. He had not had annual abuse or dementia management training in the past 12 months. CNA #3 was hired on 1/15/22. She had not had annual abuse or dementia management training in the past 12 months. CNA #4 was hired on 4/16/21. She had not had annual abuse or dementia management training in the past 12 months. CNA #5 was hired on 1/31/23. She had not had annual dementia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure consent was obtained for the use of psychotropic medications for two (#25 and #30) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication of out 17 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure consents were obtained for the usage of psychotropic medications for Resident #25 and Resident #30. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Psychotropic Medication policy and procedure, which was undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/26/24 at 11:09 a.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Residents, families, and/or representatives are involved in the medication management process. Psychotropic medication management includes: indications for use, dose, duration, and adequate monitoring for efficacy and adverse. II. Resident #25 A. Resident status Resident #25, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the February 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included major depressive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to incorporate recommendations from the preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) level II determination and evaluation from the State Mental Health Agency in the case of residents with serious mental illness or a related condition for one (#25) of three residents reviewed for PASRR out of 17 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to arrange and incorporate recommendations from the PASRR level II notice of determination for Resident #25. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #25, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the February 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included major depressive disorder, dementia and anxiety. The 10/27/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had a severe cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of three out of 15. The assessment revealed the resident had been identified as having a level II PASRR. II. PASRR level II…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan, consistent resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for one (#23) of 12 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) out of 17 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to revise Resident #23's person-centered, resident-specific care plan to addressed the resident's refusal of a physician ordered one-on-one for meal supervision. Findings include: I. Resident #23 Resident #23, under the age of 65, was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. According to the February 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included hemiplegia following a cerebral infarction (stroke), contracture of right hand and aphasia (communication deficit). The 1/8/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had intact cognition with a brief interview for mental status…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the hospice services provided met professional standards and principles that applied to individuals providing services in the facility for one (#38) of two residents receiving hospice services. Specifically, the facility failed to orient hospice aides to the facility, including the policies and procedures. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Hospice Program policy, revised July 2017, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/26/24. It read in pertinent part, Ensuring that our facility staff provides orientation on the policies and procedures of the facility, including resident rights, appropriate forms, and record keeping requirements, to hospice staff furnishing care to the residents. II. Resident status Resident #38, age over 65, was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. According to the February 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included congestive heart failure and hypertension. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-10-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was served under sanitary conditions during meal services. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Prevention of potential cross-contamination of food contact surfaces; and -Appropriate use of gloves when handling ready-to-eat foods. Findings include: I. Failure to prevent potential cross-contamination of food contact surfaces A. Professional references The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code (2017) pp. 49-50, detailed the following instances when foodservice staff should wash their hands: -Immediately before engaging in food preparation including working with exposed food, clean equipment and utensils, and unwrapped single-service articles; -After touching bare human body parts other than clean hands and clean, exposed portions of arms; -After handling soiled equipment or utensils; -During food preparation, as often as necessary to remove soil and contamination and to prevent cross contamination when changing tasks; -When switching between working with raw food and working…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-10-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts to resolve all resident grievances. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Call light wait times were resolved for Resident #35; and -Call light wait times were resolved for a group of individual residents. Findings include: I. Facility policies 1. The Call Light policy, dated 9/8/19 was provided by the social services director (SSD) on 10/9/19. It read, in pertinent part, The director of nursing (DON) or designee will complete a monthly audit to include: regular call light is answered within 5-7 minutes, bathroom call light is answered with 5-7 minutes, resident confirms call light is answered timely. The purpose of this audit is to be able to provide continuing education to all facility staff on the importance of answering call lights in a timely manner to improve overall quality care. 2. A copy of the undated Grievance policy was provided by the SSD on 10/9/19. It read, in pertinent part, The facility has designated its…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-10-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range, as evidenced by significant weight loss for one (#4) of two residents reviewed for nutrition of 29 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Follow the dietary consultant's recommendation to increase a supplement if Resident #4 had continued weight loss; -Notify the physician timely of Resident #4's continued weight loss; -Consistently review Resident #4's significant weight loss as an interdisciplinary team; and -Implement additional nutritional interventions which contributed to Resident #4's unintended weight loss and further activities of daily living (ADL) decline. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Dietary Response to Weight Loss/Gain policy, undated was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 10/9/19 at 5:30 p.m. It read, in pertinent part, the Dietary Manager will monitor the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO