No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Canyon View Care Center

151 E 3rd St, Palisade, CO 81526 · For profit - Corporation · 88 certified beds · (970) 464-7500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citations (F0565, F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$28,322 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2025
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0569)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $28,322 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-15)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
731 Iowa Ave · (970) 644-4060 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
707 Elberta Ave · (970) 464-5668 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
112 W 3rd St · (970) 464-5686 · Call to confirm hours
Park
144 Kluge Ave · (970) 464-1128 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
162 E 4th St

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.1%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.9%4.7%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%1.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.6%8.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.4%0.1%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.6%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.1%13.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.0%11.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.8%94.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.7%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.4%21.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.2%20.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.9%1.6%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine49.1%75.6%79.4%worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.09U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
<0.01hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.6%CMS range 34.5–63.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 5.4–14.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.821.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
0.72
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.45
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.72
RN hoursweekends
31.7%
Total nursing turnover
30.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 74.4 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.72 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-07-23)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2023-01-26)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that one (#1) of three out of six sample residents was kept safe and free from elopement. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (a chronic, progressive neurological condition) with dyskinesia (involuntary movements). A wander/elopement risk evaluation, completed upon the resident's admission on [DATE], revealed Resident #1 had no previous elopement attempts and was not at risk for eloping or wandering. Resident #1's record review revealed the following attempted and successful elopements after admission: On 9/4/24, a progress note revealed Resident #1 left the facility through the South Short Hall emergency exit and was verbally redirected inside. On 9/5/24, Resident #1 was agitated, packed his suitcase, and dragged it to the front door of the facility with his walker. The front door keypad was not armed and Resident #1 exited the facility, fell outside in the grass, and got…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to manage severe intractable pain for one (#3) of 16 sample residents. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE] with severe pain from cancer that had metastasized to her bones. Resident #3's goal was rehabilitation therapy and strengthening so she could be discharged home with family. Resident #3 had severe pain and physician orders for regularly scheduled and as-needed (PRN) pain medications. However, the resident was only given one dose of PRN pain medication, her daily ordered pain patch was never administered during her stay at the facility, and Resident #3 continued to suffer excruciating pain rated at severe levels, of 8, 9, and 10 out of 10 on 8/4, 8/5, 8/6 and [DATE]. Her physician was not notified at any time about her severe intractable pain. On [DATE], she was readmitted to the hospital and did not return to the facility. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Pain Management policy, dated [DATE], provided by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse, neglect and exploitation for seven (#32, #40, #49, #56, #57, #71 and #226) of nine residents reviewed for abuse out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #32 was free from physical harm and mental anguish. Resident #32 was hit repeatedly in the face by Resident #56 on 12/18/22, resulting in facial lacerations, swelling, and feelings of fearfulness and anxiety. Resident #56 continued to exhibit intimidating behaviors towards that resident in the days following the 12/18/22 altercation. In addition, the facility failed to ensure Resident #40, Resident #49, Resident #57, Resident #71 and Resident #226 on the secured/memory care unit were free from resident-to-resident altercations. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Elder Justice Act and Reporting Suspected Crimes Against Residents policy and procedure, dated 2017, was provided by the facility on 1/26/23. The policy read…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-01-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate nutrition and hydration to one (#43) of eight residents reviewed out of 41 sample residents. Resident #43 received hospice services and was documented to have unavoidable weight loss. However, the facility failed to assess Resident #43's dietary and drink preferences, assess and implement dietary interventions, provide fortified foods as recommended by the registered dietitian, and provide food and drink access to ensure the resident received the assistance needed for his comfort, enjoyment and dignity, and to ensure he did not go hungry and thirsty. These failures contributed to Resident #43 experiencing severe weight loss within the previous month, and within the previous five months after his admission to the facility. Findings include: I. Facility policies A. The Weight policy, revised May 2021, provided by the interim nursing home administrator/director of operations (INHA/DO) on the evening of 1/26/23, documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent the occurrence or recurrence of pressure injuries for one (#12) of three residents reviewed out of 24 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure complete and thorough documentation of weekly wound assessments to track the progression of a chronic pressure injury for Resident #12; and,-Ensure recommendations provided by the outpatient wound clinic provider were followed for the chronic pressure injury for Resident #12. Findings include: I. Professional referenceAccording to the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel, European Pressure Injury Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Injuries: Clinical Practice Guideline, third edition, [NAME] Haesler (Ed.), EPUAP/NPIAP/PPPIA (2019), retrieved on 2/6/26 from https://www.internatinoalguidline.com/2019 Pressure ulcer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review and observations, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accidents or hazards for one (#14) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards out of 24 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to prevent the elopement of Resident #14. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Elopement and Wandering policy, initiated 2/29/24, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/5/26 at 2:41 p.m. It read in pertinent part, To ensure the safety and well being of all residents with potential elopement risk. It is a goal of the facility to provide a safe environment using the least restrictive measure available in caring for residents who are exhibiting elopement behavior. Implementing and care planning interventions to address safety and decrease risk of elopement.II. Facility investigationThe facility investigation was provided by the NHA on 2/4/26 at 9:36 a.m. The facility investigation documented Resident #14 was in a locked courtyard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#2 and #3) of three residents reviewed for abuse out of three sample residents were kept free from abuse.Specifically, the facility failed to protect Resident #2 and Resident #3 from physical abuse by Resident #1. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Abuse policy, revised 2/29/24, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 8/14/25 at 10:29 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Residents have the right to be free from abuse. This includes but is not limited to freedom from physical abuse. Providing a safe environment for the residents is one of the most basic and essential duties of our facility. Employees have a unique position of trust with vulnerable residents. This facility promotes an atmosphere of sharing with residents and staff without fear of retribution. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including but not limited to other residents. Identification of abuse shall be the responsibility of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so the environment was free of pests. Specifically, the facility failed to prevent and take adequate measures to eliminate mice within the facility. Findings include: I. Professional references According to the State Board of Health Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations (revised 3/16/24) retrieved on 5/1/25, read in pertinent part, The premises shall be maintained free of insects, rodents, and other pests. The presence of insects, rodents, and other pests shall be controlled to eliminate their presence on the premises by: -Routinely inspecting incoming shipments of food and supplies -Routinely inspecting the premises for evidence of pests -Using methods, if pests are found, such as trapping devices or other means of pest control as specified under; and -Eliminating harborage conditions. (Chapter 6) II. Facility policy and procedure The Pest Control policy and procedure, revised May 2008, was provided by the corporate consultant (CC) on 4/29/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the possible development and transmission of infectious diseases. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Implement an effective water management plan; and, -Ensure housekeeping staff properly sanitized resident rooms. Findings include: I. Failure to have an effective water management plan A. Professional reference According to The Center for Disease Control (CDC) Legionella (Legionnaires Disease and Pontiac fever) (3/25/21), retrieved on 7/10/24 from https://www.cdc.gov/legionella/wmp/toolkit/index.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Flegionella%2Fmaintenance%2Fwmp-toolkit.html and https://www.cdc.gov/legionella/wmp/overview.html, Many buildings need a water management program to reduce the risk for Legionella growing and spreading within their water system and devices. Legionella bacteria are typically found…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to consistently serve food that was palatable, attractive and at the appropriate temperature. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable and attractive when delivered to residents. Findings include: I. Resident interviews Resident #65 was interviewed on 7/17/24 at 11:54 a.m. Resident #65 said when he received his breakfast in his room it was always served cold and under seasoned. Resident #49 was interviewed on 7/18/24 at 8:40 a.m. Resident #49 said the food was bland and had no taste. He said he received cold food. Resident #13 was interviewed on 7/18/24 at 10:34 a.m. Resident #13 said breakfast was always served cold. She said she was the last resident to get her tray. Resident #28 was interviewed on 7/18/24 at 11:56 a.m. Resident #28 said the food tasted awful and the meals were frequently served cold. Resident #28 said he had received undercooked chicken so he ordered something different if chicken was being served. II. Resident group interview Four residents (#65, #16, #59 and #49), who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen and two of two kitchenettes. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure residents were offered and provided hand hygiene before meals; -Ensure the kitchen staff appropriately cleaned thermometers before temperatures were obtained from ready-to-eat foods; and, -Ensure cold foods were held at 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or below before serving residents. Findings include: I. Resident hand hygiene A. Facility policy and procedure The Handwashing and Hand Hygiene policy, revised August 2019, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/23/24 at 5:15 p.m. It documented in pertinent part, All personnel shall be trained and regularly in-serviced on the importance of hand hygiene in preventing the transmission of healthcare-associated infections. All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors. Wash hands with soap and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the money from personal funds accounts was managed adequately for two (#7 and #13) of five residents reviewed for personal funds out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify Resident #7 and Resident #13, who were Medicaid funded, or their legal representative, when the resident's personal funds account reached $200.00 less than the eligibility resource limit for one person. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Management of Residents' Personal Funds policy, revised March 2021, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/23/24 at 5:15 p.m. It documented in pertinent part, The facility manages the residents' funds, the facility acts as a fiduciary of the resident funds and holds, safeguards, manages and accounts for the personal funds of the resident. No service charge is levied against the resident for the management of personal funds. II. Record Review A. Resident #7 A review of the facility's current trust account balance on 7/18/24 revealed Resident #7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents' personal privacy for two (#18 and #49) of three residents reviewed for privacy out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents had privacy during personal phone calls. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity policy, dated 1/1/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/23/24 at 5:15 p.m. It documented in pertinent part, All staff members are involved in providing care to residents to promote and maintain resident dignity and respect resident rights. Maintain resident privacy. II. Observations On 7/17/24 at 10:05 a.m., an unidentified resident was observed using the landline telephone at the nurse's station. Two staff members were sitting close by in the nurses station within a few feet of the resident. -No privacy was provided to the unidentified resident. On 7/19/24 at 1:41 p.m., Resident #18 was observed at the nurse's station. The resident was talking on the landline telephone. During the telephone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were kept free from abuse for one (#29) of four residents reviewed for abuse out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to protect Resident #29 from physical abuse by Resident #44. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse policy, revised 2/29/24, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/22/24 at approximately 12:00 p.m. It read in pertinent: Residents have the right to be free from abuse.This includes but is not limited to verbal and physical abuse. The resident's care plan is revised to include new approaches to reduce or eliminate any further chance of abuse. Recommendations for appropriate intervention can then be implemented. When another resident jeopardizes the safety of one resident, alternative placement may be considered for that resident. II. Incident of physical abuse between Resident #44 and Resident #29 on 7/2/24 A. Facility investigation of the altercation on 7/2/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide treatment and services to maintain hearing in a timely manner for one (#3) of one resident reviewed out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure recommendations for Resident #3 were followed after an audiologist appointment. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Ancillary Services policy, dated 11/4/13, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/23/24 at 5:15 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Any resident needing or requesting ancillary services, such as dental, vision, audiology and podiatry will have their needs met timely. The facility will keep available a provider for ancillary services and/or assist the resident with utilizing the provider of their choice. II. Resident status Resident #3, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included unspecified intracranial injury with loss of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide an effective pain management regimen in a manner consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the resident's goals for one (#49) of two residents reviewed for pain out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Consistently and accurately assess Resident #49's pain to ensure the resident's pain was at or below the resident's stated tolerable pain level; -Ensure Resident #49's care plan included person-centered non-pharmacological interventions for pain; and, -Ensure the physician's order for routine pain medication for Resident #49 was administered as ordered. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Pain Management policy, dated 5/3/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/23/24 at 5:15 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Acceptable (tolerable) pain control is defined by the resident. All residents will be evaluated for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months and provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews for four out of five staff reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not complete annual performance reviews and/or provided regular in-service education based on the outcome of the reviews for certified nurse aide (CNA) #2. Findings include: I. Record review CNA #2 (hired on 6/23/22) did not have an annual performance review completed. CNA #2 did not have an in-service education plan based on the outcome of the review. II. Staff interviews The director of staff development (DSD) was interviewed on 7/22/24 at 2:18 p.m. The DSD said she completed an audit of the system when she accepted her position in the beginning of 2024. She said she discovered there was an issue with staff completing their training as required. She said she worked on a spreadsheet to help track the training staff needed to complete. She said the staff completed a performance every year and if it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility's binding arbitration agreement was thoroughly and accurately explained to the residents and or resident representatives before signing the agreement for two (#176 and #40) of three residents out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Thoroughly explain the binding arbitration agreement in a form and in a manner to ensure Resident #176 and Resident #40 and/or their representatives understood the agreement before signing the arbitration agreement; and, -Ensure staff reviewing the arbitration agreement with Resident #176 and Resident #40 and/or their representatives understood the components of the agreement. Findings include: I. The Arbitration Agreement The Arbitration Introduction form, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/22/24 at 2:51 p.m. The Arbitration Introduction read in pertinent part, Arbitration is a cost effective, private and time saving alternative means of resolving disputes outside of the courts. In arbitration, disputes are heard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an environment for residents, staff and the public that is safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure appropriate communication occurred regarding the facility's [AGE] year old hot water heater. The facility's failure to address the concerns timely resulted in the hot water heater failing and the facility was without hot water to provide a comfortable bathing experience for residents during a three week time period. Finding include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity policy, dated 1/1/23, was obtained from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/23/24 at 5:15 p.m. It documented in pertinent part, All staff members are involved in providing care to residents to promote and maintain resident dignity and respect resident rights. The resident's former lifestyle and personal choices will be considered when providing care and services to meet the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-07 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#12, #13 and #18) of eight residents reviewed out of 19 sample residents were provided personal privacy during care. Specifically, nursing staff failed to: -Ensure privacy during medication administration and treatment for Resident #13; -Ensure staff pulled the privacy curtain and/or closed the door while Resident #18 was getting dressed; and, -Ensure privacy during nail care for Resident #12. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Statement of Resident Rights and Responsibilities, undated, was provided by the regional operations manager (ROM) on 11/7/23 via email. According to the policy statement, the residents had the right to personal privacy. The Medication Administration policy, revised 11/1/22, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 11/7/23 at 1:40 p.m. the policy directed staff to provide privacy during medication administration. II. Resident #13 A. Resident status Resident #13, age [AGE], was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#3) of three residents reviewed for dementia care received the appropriate treatment and services to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being out of 19 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Prevent Resident #3 from eloping the facility; -Have a procedure in place for the nurses to know which residents needed supervision when leaving the facility and which residents were able to independently leave the facility; and, -Ensure Resident #3 was assessed appropriately for his elopement risk. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Elopement and Wandering policy, revised March 2023, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 11/7/23 at 3:24 p.m. read in pertinent: The purpose is to ensure the safety and well-being of all residents with potential elopement risk. A wander/elopement assessment will be completed on all residents upon admission to the facility. The outcome is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rights to be treated with respect and dignity in keeping with their individuality for five (#3, #12, #13, #14 and #16) out of 16 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Provide dignified assistance when Resident #3 requested a bedpan instead of instructing her to use her brief and be changed at a later time; -Provide timely and dignified call light response when Resident #3 needed assistance with pain medications and care; and -Provide timely and dignified call light response when Residents #12, #13, #14 and #16 needed assistance with care when they were choking, incontinent or needed colostomy care or assistance to the bathroom. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Dignity policy, revised February 2021, provided by the regional director of operations (RDO) on [DATE], included in pertinent part: Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances their sense of well-being, level of satisfaction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Residents were not subjected to uncomfortable noise levels in their rooms; -Resident room doors opened properly and safely; -Resident rooms were clean, comfortable, free of urine and cigarette smoke odors and in good repair; -Common areas were homelike and well-maintained; and -Bed linens were in good condition. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Homelike Environment policy, revised February 2021, provided by the regional director of operations (RDO) on 8/24/23, included in pertinent part: Staff provides person-centered care that emphasizes the residents' comfort, independence and personal needs and preferences. The facility staff and management maximizes to the extent possible the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting to include: -clean, sanitary and orderly environment; -clean bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-24 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews and observation, the facility failed to assess and ensure nutritional and hydration parameters were met and food and drink preferences provided for four (#3, #12, #13 and #4) out of 16 sample residents, and failed to provide dietary preferences for multiple additional facility residents as voiced by resident council members. Specifically, Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on 8/7/23 with severe intractable pain from metastatic cancer with the goal for strengthening so she could move home with her family. Her nutritional and hydration needs were not assessed, care planned or provided. Current facility residents including Residents #12, #13 and #4 likewise said during individual interviews and in resident council their food preferences were not honored and/or available and the facility was not responsive to their stated concerns. Findings include: I. Resident #3 A. Resident status Resident #3, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and observations, the facility failed to consistently ensure a phone was available for resident use for two (#13 and #3) out of 16 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to consistently provide operational phones for residents to use from their rooms or other private areas. Resident #3 was told by staff that there was no facility phone available for resident use. Resident #13 said it was hard to access a private phone at the facility if her cell phone did not work. Findings include: I. Resident/family interviews Resident #13 was interviewed on [DATE] at 11:25 a.m. She said it was hard to access a private phone conversation. My cell phone doesn't always have service because Wi-Fi's often down. The Wi-Fi here is terrible; it's down most of the time. She said she could always make a call at the nurses' desk but it was not private. Resident #3's son was interviewed on [DATE] at 11:04 a.m. He said Resident #3 was in the facility from [DATE] through [DATE] (Friday through Monday) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medical durable power of attorney (MDPOA) and the physician were notified of changes in condition for one (#2) out of 15 sample residents. Specifically the facility failed to: -Add the resident's MDPOA to the charting system with contact information; -Notify the MDPOA and physician of the resident's high blood glucose (BG); -Notify the MDPOA when the nurse observed black coffee ground-like stool; and -Notify the MDPOA of Resident #2's death in a timely manner. Cross-reference F684, quality of care regarding diabetic and anticoagulant management and monitoring. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #2, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE] and passed away on 3/14/23 at 10:13 p.m. in the facility. According to the March 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included acute embolism and thrombosis of the right internal jugular vein (what happens when a blood clot blocks a vein in your neck), acute kidney failure, chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to assess, report, and treat high blood sugar and potential side effects of anticoagulants (blood thinner) for one (#2) of 15 sample residents. Specifically the facility failed to: -Get clarifying orders for an sliding scale insulin and transcribe admission order for insulin upon admission for Resident #2; -Notify the physician and medical durable power of attorney (MDPOA) in a timely manner about Resident #2's extremely high blood glucose levels -Call rather than fax the physician and call the MDPOA to report that the resident bowel movements were tarry black stools and resembling coffee grounds; -Update Resident #2's care plan for diabetes and anticoagulant management; and -Have a physician examine and assess the resident upon admission due to his complicated diagnoses and condition changes. Cross-reference F580, for failure to notify the resident physician and MDPOA of the resident change of condition. Findings include: I. Facility policies The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-26 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to take action to resolve grievances of the resident council group, affecting 10 (#34, #24, #22, #23, #35, #60, #62, #54, #7 and #68) of 41 sample residents, and potentially affecting all the residents who lived in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to follow-up with concerns that were brought up by the group of residents during the resident council meetings. Findings include: I. Resident group interview A resident group interview was conducted on 1/23/23 at 10:30 a.m. with 10 residents who were resident council officers, regularly attended resident council meetings, and were identified by the facility as interviewable. Residents said the facility did not have enough staff. They have good staff, just not enough of them. As a result, It takes longer to respond to a call light. One resident said his roommate was in bad shape and he had to keep an eye on him because he was unable to call staff for assistance. One thing we lack is a bath aide, because baths are a problem. I have a bath scheduled today but don't know…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to consistently ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment in resident rooms, shower/tub rooms and common areas in four of four neighborhoods. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Resident rooms and bathrooms were properly cleaned and maintained; -Wash cloths and towels were available in residents' bathrooms; and -Shower/tub rooms were functional, safe and properly cleaned. Cross-reference F565, grievances of the resident group. Findings include: I. Observations during the initial facility tour on 1/19/23 at 9:30 a.m., and throughout the survey on 1/22, 1/23, 1/24, 1/25 and 1/26/23, revealed resident rooms and bathrooms were not thoroughly cleaned and needed repairs, and clean towels and wash cloths were not readily available for residents. Specifically, dust build-up and debris were not swept from under beds and furniture, toilets were soiled or stained and not properly cleaned, privacy curtains were soiled and/or stained, bedside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-26 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure level I and level II preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) were completed for four (#4, #5, #37 and #57) out of five residents reviewed for PASRR to gain and maintain their highest practical medical, emotional, and psychosocial well-being out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #37, with a known psychological disorder, was properly assessed with a PASRR level I or level II assessment; -Ensure Resident #5 and #57 had a level I PASRR screening completed timely; and, -Have the training and knowledge to follow up with PASRR screening identified concerns for Resident #4. Findings include: I. Resident #57 A. Resident status Resident #57, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. She resided in the secured/memory care unit. According to the January 2023 CPO, diagnoses included Wernicke's encephalopathy (a brain disorder causing confusion), anxiety disorder, and delusional disorders. The 12/19/22 MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide and deploy sufficient nursing staffing to meet the needs of residents in keeping with their comprehensive care plans, and ensure their highest practicable quality of care. Specifically, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to provide a dignified and respectful resident environment, keep residents free from abuse, prevent falls and accidents, provide adequate nutrition and hydration, and provide dementia care and services. Findings include: Cross-reference F565, grievances of the resident group involving care and services issues; F600, freedom from abuse; F689, falls and accidents; F692, nutrition and hydration; and F744, dementia care. I. Resident status According to the 1/25/23 Resident Census and Conditions report, 75 residents lived in the facility. For bathing, 37 residents needed assistance of one or two staff and 13 were dependent. For dressing, 69 residents needed assistance. For transfers, 60 residents needed assistance and five were dependent. For toilet use, 63 residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-26 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident diagnosed with dementia, received the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for six (#32, #40, #56, #57, #71 and #226) of nine residents reviewed for mood and behavior out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to effectively identify and implement person-centered approaches for dementia care to prevent resident-to-resident altercations. Cross-reference: F600 failure to prevent resident abuse. Specifically, to create an environment to: -Provide consistent and engaging group activities when routine activity was not available; and, -Ensure the activity environment was appropriate for all residents in the memory care unit based on the resident ' s comprehensive care plan. Findings include: I. Professional reference The Alzheimer's Association Tips for Dementia Caregivers in Long-Term or Community-Based…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of five percent (%) or greater. Specifically, the medication administration observation error rate was 16%, or four errors out of 25 opportunities for error. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Medication Administration and General Guidelines policy and procedure, dated November 2022, was provided by the interim nursing home administrator/corporate director of operations (INHA/DO) on 1/26/23 at 6:53 p.m. It included medications were administered as prescribed, in accordance with State regulations using good nursing principles and practices. The proper steps in the administration of medications included adherence to the six rights of medication administration including: 1) Right dose 2) Right route 3) Right resident 4) Right Medication 5) Right time 6) Right documentation II. Medication error observations and interviews A. Licensed practical nurse (LPN) #3 was observed preparing and administering medications to Resident #42 on 1/25/23 at 5:13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review and observations, the facility failed to ensure residents consistently receive food prepared by methods that conserved nutritive value, palatable in taste, texture, appearance and temperature. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Resident food was palatable in taste, texture, appearance and temperature; and, -Meals were served at a palatable temperature. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Quality and Palatability policy, revised September 2007, was provided by the corporate dietary manager (CDM) on 1/25/23 at 2:44 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part: Food will be prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor and appearance. Food will be palatable, attractive and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. Food and liquids are prepared and served in a manner, form, and texture to meet residents' needs. The policy defined food attractiveness as the appearance of the food when served to residents. The policy defined food palatable as the taste and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to prepare and serve food in a safe and sanitary manner to prevent cross-contamination and potential food borne illnesses, in one of one kitchen during meal services, and one of two dining rooms. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff followed accepted hand hygiene practices during the meal service to prevent potential cross-contamination; and, -Ensure resident food was served at the appropriate temperature. Findings include: I. Professional standards The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), reviewed 8/5/22, retrieved on 2/4/23 from: https://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/keep-food-safe.html, under Four Steps to Food Safety read to Wash your hands for at least 20 seconds with soap and warm or cold water before, during, and after preparing food and before eating. According to the CDC, food should be chilled promptly because bacteria could multiply rapidly if left at room temperature or in the ' Danger Zone ' between 40 degrees F (Fahrenheit) and 140 degrees F. II. Facility policy The Food Preparation policy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to document resuscitation choices accurately in the medical record for one (#4) out of five residents reviewed for advanced directives out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a facility nurse assigned to Resident #4 knew where to locate Resident #4's advance directives to ensure the directives would be carried out in case of emergency. Findings inclue: I. Facility policy The Communication of Code Status policy, revised [DATE], was provided by the facility on [DATE] at 6:47 p.m. The policy read: It is the policy of this facility to adhere to the residents' rights to formulate advanced directives. In accordance to these rights, the facility will Implement procedures to communicate a resident's code status to those individuals who need to know this information. According to the policy, the designated sections in the medical record to find the resident's code status was the physician orders under code status, and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#25) of 12 residents reviewed out of 41 sample residents was provided personal privacy during care. Specifically, nursing staff failed to ensure they pulled the privacy curtain and keep the door closed while providing incontinence care for Resident #25. Findings include: I. Resident #25 status Resident #25, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the January 2023 computerized physician orders, diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, reduced mobility, and need for assistance with personal care. The 11/17/22 minimum data set assessment documented severe cognitive impairment, physical behavior directed toward others, and no care rejection. She needed extensive assistance with activities of daily living. II. Observation On 1/19/23 at 5:00 p.m., certified nurse aide (CNA) #3 was observed leaving Resident #25's room pushing a Hoyer (mechanical) lift ahead of her and parking it in the hallway. She had left the door open and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for two (#32 and #56) of eight residents reviewed for accident hazards out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure appropriate and effective measures were in place to prevent Resident #32 from repeated falls, often related to the need to use the restroom. The resident fell eight times between 12/1/22 and 1/23/23. The repeat falls resulting in increased pain for Resident #32; -Ensure fall prevention interventions were put in place after the Resident #56 had an increase in medications that increased the residents risk for falls.; and, -Ensure Resident #56 had walking/locomotion assistance as identified on the resident's minimum data set assessment. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Fall Management policy, revised December 2022, the policy read and pertinent part: The facility assists each resident in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#42) out of one resident who required dialysis care, out of 41 sample residents received dialysis services consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility: -Failed to blood pressure (BP) measurements were not checked on the right arm where the dialysis fistula/shunt was located; and, -Failed to ensure communication between the dialysis center and the facility. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Hemodialysis policy and procedure, dated 2022, was provided by the interim nursing home administrator/corporate director of operations (INHA/DO) on 1/26/23 at 12:35 p.m., and included the following: The facility will assure that each resident receives care and services for the provision of hemodialysis consistent with professional standards of practices. This will include ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#42) of 10 residents reviewed for medication administration of 41 sample residents were free from a significant medication error that involved insulin. Specifically, the insulin pen was not primed prior to injection for Resident #42. Findings include: A. Facility policy and procedure The Medication Administration and General Guidelines policy and procedure, dated November 2022, was provided by the interim nursing home administrator/corporate director of operations (INHA/DO) on 1/26/23 at 6:53 p.m. It included medications were administered as prescribed, in accordance with State regulations using good nursing principles and practices. The proper steps in the administration of medications included adherence to the six rights of medication administration including: 1) Right dose 2) Right route 3) Right resident 4) Right Medication 5) Right time 6) Right documentation B. Medication error 1. Observation Licensed practical nurse (LPN) #3 was observed preparing and administering medications to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of record of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for nine residents (#37, #42, #305, #15, #34, #6, #18, #47 and #14) out of 24 residents reviewed for narcotic administration out of 33 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure narcotic removal documentation in the narcotic log matched the dates of narcotic administration in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) for Residents #37, #42, #305, #15, #34, #6, #18, #47 and #14. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure A Controlled Substance Administration and Accountability policy, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/20/21 at 12:39 p.m. that read: It is the policy of this facility to promote safe, high quality patient care, complaint with state and federal regulations regarding monitoring the use of controlled substances. The facility will have safeguards in place in order to prevent loss, diversion or accidental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to manage and alleviate pain for one (#37) of five residents reviewed for pain out of 33 sample residents. Resident #37 experienced daily, unrelieved, severe pain described at level 10 on a scale of zero to 10, with 10 being the worst possible pain. Facility assessment on 12/4/21 documented her pain was constant and severe at 8-10 in her back and joints. The pain interfered with her sleep, daily activities and quality of life. The pain evaluation further documented the resident was not satisfied with her pain regime with her pain described as stabbing, aching and shooting spasms. Furthermore, the facility failed to notify the physician of the resident's frequent breakthrough pain, or schedule a pain clinic consultation to find ways to alleviate the resident's pain. Findings include: I. Facility policy The undated Pain Management policy, provided by the corporate nurse consultant on the afternoon of 12/20/21, documented in pertinent part…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$28,322 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $11,649 — penalty dated 2024-11-15
  • $16,673 — penalty dated 2023-08-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CANYON VIEW SNF HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 09/01/2024
RASKIN, CHAIMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
MOSKOWITZ, JAYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
VALLE, KARLAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
BEECAN HEALTH CO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/13/2025
NOBLE, JAMIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/10/2016
DERGANCE, JEANNAEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
HASKELL, CYNTHIAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
KORETKE, MARYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-21.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 84%Medicare 2%Other / private 14%

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$331per resident / day
operating cost
$10,050per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$272per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Colorado
$10,159/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,182/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,584/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065228. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-07-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next