Center At Park West Llc, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 638 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 49.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 189 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 55% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 60.1 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.31 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.19 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.46 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.28 to 0.98 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-10-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two (#1 and #5) of six residents out of 17 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Provide timely, consistent and effective monitoring and appropriate documentation for Resident #1's left lower leg amputation surgical incision, which resulted in the resident's transfer to the hospital where she was hospitalized for 10 days with a diagnosis of a left below the knee amputation incision infection; and,-Obtain wound care orders for Resident #5's skin tear in a timely manner. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a hospital stay for a surgical amputation of her left lower leg. Resident #1 had an initial skin assessment completed at the facility on 8/27/25 which documented the staples to the incision were intact and the wound was well approximated (edges of the skin were closed together). An 8/27/25 wound care evaluation assessment did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-10-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services to prevent pressure injuries to prevent or heal pressure injuries for two (#9 and #7) of six residents out of 17 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:- Accurately identify, document, evaluate and monitor a pressure ulcer for Resident #9;- Ensure Resident #9's weekly skin assessments were documented thoroughly and accurately; and,- Ensure appropriate wound prevention interventions, including an air mattress, were implemented timely and consistently monitored for function and settings for Resident #9 and Resident #7.Resident #9, who was at risk for skin breakdown, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] following a hospitalization for a right hip fracture. The admission skin assessment documented she had scattered bruising to her abdomen and a bruise to her right ear. On 9/9/25 the facility documented the resident had moisture-associated skin damage (MASD) to her coccyx and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in a sanitary manner in the kitchen.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure food items in the main kitchen refrigerator were labeled and dated;-Maintain the ice scoop holder and the microwave in a sanitary condition; and, -Ensure raw meat was stored in a manner that prevented cross contamination of ready-to-eat foods.Findings include:I. Failure to properly label and date food itemsA. Professional reference The Colorado Retail Food Establishment Regulations, (3/16/24), retrieved on 6/30/26, read in pertinent part, Working containers holding food or food ingredients that are removed from their original packages for use in the food establishment shall be identified with the common name of the food. (3-302.12) Refrigerated, ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-10-23 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for the resident that met professional standards of quality care for three (#2, #8 and #17) of five residents out of 17 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to fully develop, review with the resident and/or his responsible party and implement a person-centered baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for Resident #2, Resident #8 and Resident #17.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Baseline Care Plan policy and procedure, revised 3/28/24, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 10/23/25 at 6:49 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The baseline care plan must be developed within 48 hours of a patient's admission. The facility must provide the patient and their representative, if applicable, with a summary of the baseline care plan. II. Resident #2 A. Resident status Resident #2, age…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-23 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to residents diagnosed with dementia for three (#17, #5 and #3) of five residents out of 17 sample residents.Specifically the facility failed to:-Develop a person-centered care plan to meet Resident #17's dementia care needs;-Ensure Resident #5 was provided activities to meet her preferences; and,-Develop and implement a person-centered care plan to meet Resident #3's dementia care needs.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Care of the Cognitively Impaired policy, reviewed on 9/22/25, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 10/23/25 at approximately 3:00 p.m. Ensuring adequate medical care, diagnosis, and supports based on diagnosis; Ensuring that the necessary care and services are person-centered and reflect the resident's goals, while maximizing the resident's dignity, autonomy, privacy, socialization, independence, choice, and safety; and, Utilizing individualized,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-23 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (#2) of six residents out of 17 sample residents were provided prompt efforts by the facility to resolve grievances. Specifically, the facility failed to effectively resolve and demonstrate the facility's response to individual grievances for Resident #2.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Grievance policy, revised 1/8/24, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 10/23/25 at 3:36 p.m. It read in pertinent part, If the complaint is verbal, it is the responsibility of the staff member who received the complaint to properly complete the grievance form on behalf of the complainant. The completed form must be provided to the executive director or designee immediately. The grievance will be given to the appropriate department manager for follow up and resolution. All grievances will be reviewed in the morning meeting with interdisciplinary (IDT) members. The department managers are responsible for the resolution of all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary services to maintain proper personal hygiene and good nutrition for two (#3 and #7) of five residents reviewed for ADLs out of 17 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure Resident #3 consistently received assistance with meals and showers; and, -Ensure Resident #7 received assistance with showers. Findings include: I. Resident #3 A. Resident status Resident #3, age greater than 65, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the October 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included cellulitis (skin infection caused when germs enter through a crack in the skin) of left lower limb, lymphedema (a condition where fluid called lymph builds up in the body's tissues causing swelling usually in the arms and legs) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate gland) with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to keep medical records in a secure and confidential manner. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff logged off their workstation when leaving the work area to protect the confidentiality of resident information. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure A request for a protected health information policy was requested on 8/1/24, but was not received. II. Observations On 7/30/24 observations were made on the second and third floor units. The second and third floors each had a nurses station in the middle of the unit with five to seven computer monitors. The second and third floor units had three hallways with resident rooms. Each hallway had a computer at a workstation in the middle of the hallway. The second and third floor units had three medication carts with a computer. Residents, visitors and families frequently walked down the hallways and by the nurses station, which enabled the computers to be visible to anybody walking by. At 2:42 p.m. an unidentified nurse left her computer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided an environment as free of accident hazards as possible for one (#32) of two residents reviewed for accidents and hazards out of 40 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure a thorough investigation was conducted after a skin tear was acquired during a staff-assisted transfer for Resident #32; and, -Identify the root cause of Resident #32's skin tear. Findings include: I. Resident #32 A. Resident status Resident #32, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the August 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included type 2 diabetes, interstitial pulmonary disease (lung disorder), heart failure, atrial fibrillation, morbid obesity and unsteadiness on her feet. The 6/19/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. She required substantial assistance for toileting.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide an effective pain management regimen consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the resident's goal for one (#32) of two residents out of 40 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to, for Resident #32: -Ensure a pain assessment was completed that identified the type of pain, the effects of pain on the resident, the aggravating factors and the relieving factors; -Ensure person centered non-pharmacological interventions for pain management were offered and monitored for effectiveness; and, -Ensure the administration of pain medications was documented consistently. Findings include: I. Resident #32 A. Resident status Resident #32, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the August 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included type 2 diabetes, interstitial pulmonary disease (inflammation and scarring that made it hard for lungs to get…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#98) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications out of 40 sample residents was free from unnecessary medications. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #98's hours of sleep were documented for psychotropic medication use; and, -Ensure person-centered interventions to address Resident #98's repetitive statements were identified and attempted prior to ordering an antipsychotic medication for the resident. Findings include: I. Resident #98 A. Resident status Resident #98, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE], discharged on 6/1/24 and readmitted on [DATE]. According to the August 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included dementia, transient ischemic attack (stroke), cerebral infarction, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, insomnia and anxiety. The 5/17/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairments with a brief interview for mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to meet all of the requirements for the provision of hospice for one (#19) of one resident reviewed for hospice services out of 40 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a hospice care plan was initiated for Resident #19 to determine who was responsible for resident care. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Care Plan policy, revised 2/8/21, was received by the director of nursing (DON) on 8/1/24 at 10:54 a.m. The policy read in pertinent part, It is the policy of the facility to promote seamless interdisciplinary care for our residents by utilizing the interdisciplinary plan of care based on assessment, planning, treatment, service and intervention. It is utilized to plan and manage resident care as evidenced by documentation from admission through discharge for each resident. The care plan will identify priority problems and needs to be addressed by the interdisciplinary team, and will reflect the patient's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO