No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Spanish Peaks Veterans Community Living Center

23500 Us Highway 160, Walsenburg, CO 81089 · Government - Hospital district · 120 certified beds · (719) 738-4540 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (24) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4491 Bent Brothers Blvd · (719) 595-7525 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Star Drug3.1 mi
520 Main St · (719) 738-1130 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway3.0 mi
222 W 7th St · (719) 738-3300 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased23.8%13.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.4%4.7%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.1%8.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.1%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened19.6%13.3%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.3%11.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.4%94.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.0%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.9%21.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.6%20.0%17.1%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.981.381.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.641.741.80typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

1.23
RN hours/ resident / day
0.56
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.90
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.68
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.02
RN hoursweekends
44.3%
Total nursing turnover
41.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 73.9 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 46 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.23 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.90 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.95 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.31 to 1.02 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-12-05)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2023-06-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-06-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#4) of four residents received prompt dental services out of 21 sample residents. Resident #4 started complaining about upper and lower gum pain preventing him from wearing his dentures on 5/31/23. Through an observation and the resident interview, he grimaced and closed his eyes when trying to chew the food offered and he said he had difficulty eating at times due to his dentures not fitting properly. Due to the facility's failures to provide emergent and timely dental care and services, the resident expressed sadness, had ongoing mouth pain and had difficulty eating the meals provided to him. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #4, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), the diagnoses included chronic kidney disease and heart disease. The 6/21/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#1) of three residents reviewed for abuse out of six sample residents were kept free from abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to protect Resident #1 from physical abuse by Resident #2. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse Prohibition policy, revised January 2025, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/18/25 at 3:24 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, The policy of this facility is to make all efforts to protect its residents from abuse. The facility will educate staff and residents on how to avoid situations that may result in an abuse incident. The facility has implemented proactive rounding to identify any potential triggers that may lead residents to respond negatively to each other and to identify stimuli such as wandering residents. This proactive approach will promote a safe environment that is free of abuse and identify triggers that will help avoid abuse. II. Incident of physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#65, #56 and #12) of three residents reviewed out of 28 sample residents were kept free from abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Prevent a resident-to-resident altercation between Resident #65 and Resident #56; and, -Protect Resident #12 from physical abuse by Resident #65. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse Prohibition policy and procedure, dated 8/1/18, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/2/24 at 12:39 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to make all efforts to protect its residents from abuse. The facility will periodically interview staff, residents and families to determine if there are any situations that could lead to a possible incident (staff stress, resident behaviors). The facility will educate staff and residents on how to avoid situations that may result in an abuse incident. The facility will educate staff and residents of possible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a through safety assessment was completed and documented before the installation of side/bed rails for four (#70, #57, #63 and #38) of 10 residents out of 28 sample residents. Specifically, for Residents #70, #57, #63 and #38, the facility failed to: -Ensure the residents were thoroughly assessed prior to the installation of bed rails, to include the residents' medical diagnoses, conditions, symptoms and/or behavioral symptoms, size and weight, sleep habits, medication(s), acute medical or surgical interventions, underlying medical conditions, existence of delirium, ability to toilet self safely, communication and mobility (in and out of bed); and, -Evaluate the use of alternative interventions prior to the installation or use of a bed rail and how those alternatives failed to meet the residents' assessed needs. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedures The Devices - Restraints/Safety/Positioning/Mobility Devices policy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and an environment as free from accidents hazards as possible for two (#4 and #24) of 18 residents reviewed for accident hazards out of 28 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure scissors were not available for Resident #4 to use and prevent injury to Resident #4 when he attempted to cut his fingernails with the scissors; -Ensure essential oils were not left unsecured in Resident #4's room, who was not assessed for self-administration; and, -Ensure hydrocortisone cream was not left unsecured in Resident #24's room, who was not assessed to self-administer this medication. Findings include: I. Failure to ensure scissors were not available for Resident #4 to use and prevent injury to Resident #4 when he attempted to cut his fingernails with the scissors. A. Resident #4 1. Resident status Resident #4, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the December 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#4) of five residents out of 28 sample residents was free from significant medication errors. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure insulin was not given when Resident #4's blood glucose (sugar) level was below the parameter for administration; -Ensure insulin was consistently administered for Resident #4; and, -Ensure Resident #4 had physician orders for what to do if the resident's blood glucose was too high (hyperglycemia). Findings include: I. Professional reference According to [NAME], P.A. and [NAME], A.G. et.al., (2020), Fundamentals of Nursing, ninth edition, pp 624 - 626, Medication errors can cause or lead to inappropriate medication use or patient harm. Medication errors include inaccurate prescribing, administration of the wrong medication, giving the medication using the wrong route or time interval. Administering extra doses, and/or failing to administer medications. Preventing medication errors is essential.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, stored, and served under safe and sanitary conditions to prevent the potential contamination of food and the spread of food-borne illness in one of two dining rooms. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure hand hygiene was performed appropriately while assisting residents with meals; and, -Ensure staff did not handle ready to eat food with bare hands. I. Professional reference The Colorado Retail Food Establishment Regulations, (3/16/24), were retrieved on 12/11/24 from https://cdphe.colorado.gov/environment/food-regulations. It revealed in pertinent part, Food employees may not contact exposed, ready-to-eat food with their bare hands and shall use suitable utensils such as deli tissue, spatulas, tongs, single-use gloves, or dispensing equipment. If used, single-use gloves shall be used for only one task such as working with ready-to-eat food or with raw animal food, used for no other purpose, and discarded when damaged or soiled, or when interruptions occur in the operation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene was conducted while performing wound care. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Clinical Safety: Clean Hands for Healthcare Workers (2/27/24), retrieved on 12/10/24 from https://www.cdc.gov/clean-hands/hcp/clinical-safety, If your task requires gloves, perform hand hygiene before donning gloves and touching the patient or the patient's surroundings. Always clean your hands after removing gloves. II. Facility policy and procedure The Hand Hygiene policy, dated 4/8/22, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/5/24 at 11:53 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Our facility acknowledges that strict adherence to hand hygiene practices will significantly reduce the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and served under sanitary conditions in one kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Appropriate hand hygiene by food service staff; -Cutting boards were free from deep scratches and stains; and, -Beard restraints were worn in kitchen areas while serving food. Findings include: I. Improper hand hygiene A. Professional references According to the Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations (effective 1/1/19) pg.46-47, Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms immediately before engaging in food preparation including working with exposed food, clean equipment and utensils, and unwrapped single-service items and: -Before handling or putting on single use gloves for working with food, and between removing soiled gloves and putting on clean gloves. Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms including surrogate prosthetic devices for hands or arms with soap and water for at least 20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible; and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for two (#70 and #4) of five residents reviewed for assistive devices out of 21 sample residents and residents at risk for unsafe water temperatures. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure safe water temperatures; -Assess for effectiveness of bed alarm and to ensure alarm was not utilized for the convenience of staff for Resident #70; and, -Ensure Resident #4's room was free from accidents/hazards causing injuries to his lower extremities Findings include: I. Water temperatures 6/26/23 -At 2:34 p.m., the temperature of the tap water was obtained in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The water was found to be 129 degrees Fahrenheit (F); -room [ROOM NUMBER]'s water temperature was 129 degrees F; -room [ROOM NUMBER]'s water temperature was 128 degrees F; -room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses were able to demonstrate competencies in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through the facility assessment. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had completed competencies in the past 12 months prior to providing skilled services as described in facility assessment for three out of three registered nurses (RN) and one out of one licensed practical nurses (LPN) reviewed for competencies. Findings include: I. Facility assessment According to the facility assessment, updated 1/1/23, and provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/27/23, the facility assessment identified the staff competency and care area requirements as: -Catheter care -Bladder scanner -Incontinence/Toileting program -Respiratory treatment -End of life care -Infection control -Dementia care -Behavioral healthcare (including post-traumatic stress disorder and trauma history) -Ostomy care -Gastronomy tube care/use -Restorative nursing -Pain management -Pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 13 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to prevent abuse for two (#70 and #126) of five residents out of 21 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Prevent resident to resident physical abuse altercations between Resident #11 and Resident #70 on 3/3/23 and on 3/4/23; and, -Verbal abuse between Resident #126 and Resident #24. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse Prohibition policy, revised 8/1/22, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/28/23 at 11:47 a.m. It read in pertinent part: Always operating with the foundational premise that patient safety is the first building block in creating a great patient experience, it is the policy of (facility name) to make patient safety a top priority in every decision we make and activity we carry out. With this policy comes the expectation that every employee at every level of the organization, affiliated medical provider and business associate will proactively and continuously seek out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to coordinate changes to the preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) level II determination and evaluation report promptly with the State Mental Health Agency in the case of residents with serious mental illness or a related condition for two (#68 and #29) of five residents reviewed for PASRR out of 21 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Coordinate the re-evaluation of mental illness (MI) and symptoms for Resident #68; and, -Notify the State Mental Health Agency when recommendations could not be met for Resident #29. Findings include: I. Resident #68 A. Resident status Resident #68, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included prostate cancer, major depressive disorder recurrent and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The 3/10/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for one (#11) of four residents reviewed for activities out of 21 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #11 was invited and encouraged to attend activities of his preference. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedures The Activities Program policy, revised 9/14/21, was provided on 6/28/23 at 11:47 a.m. by the nursing home administrator (NHA). It read in pertinent part, An activity program designed to provide a balancer of physical, intellectual, social, and spiritual therapy for each resident, respectful of their rights. Activities should encourage self-care, self-worth, resumption of normal activities, and maintenance of optimal level of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#68) of four residents received proper assistive devices to maintain hearing abilities out of 21 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a resident requiring additional audiology appointments to test for hearing aids received those promptly for Resident #68. Findings include: I. Resident #68 A. Resident status Resident #68, aged 76, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), the diagnoses included prostate cancer and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The 3/10/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. The resident had difficulty hearing in noisy environments or if people spoke softly. The resident did not have hearing aids. B. Resident interview Resident #68 was interviewed on 6/27/23 at 1:24 p.m. He stated he had a hearing test and was supposed to have another…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#68 and #29) of six residents diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty received appropriate treatment and services to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial wellbeing out of 21 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure residents expressing suicidal ideations were assessed and monitored for Resident #68; and. -Ensure residents with a major mental illness (MI) requesting services received them for Resident #29. Findings include: I. Resident #68 A. Resident status Resident #68, aged 76, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), the diagnoses included prostate cancer, major depressive disorder recurrent and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The 3/10/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. No behaviors were coded. B.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#24) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications of 21 sample residents was free from unnecessary drugs. Specifically, the facility increased a psychoactive medication without evidence and documentation of increased behaviors or change in demeanor or attempts of non-pharmacological interventions prior to medication increase for Residents #24. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Behavior Management and Psychotropic Medication policy, revised April 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/28/23 at 12:32 p.m. included: Psychotropic medications should only be considered when a resident's behavioral symptoms cause potential harm to the resident or to others, when the behavioral symptoms cause the resident undue distress (including symptoms that may occur during end-of-life), and when all other interventions have failed to adequately manage the problem. Residents receiving psychotropic medication will be on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-08-06 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. Specifically, the facility failed to have a comprehensive facility assessment to include: -All buildings and/or other physical structures and vehicles; and -Health information technology resources, such as systems for electronically managing patient records and electronically sharing information with other organizations. Findings include: I. Facility assessment A review of the facility assessment (FA) revealed it was not a comprehensive assessment of the facility's resources necessary to provide daily care to the resident population.The FA was completed for the 2018-2019 year. The FA failed to identify all buildings and/or other physical structures and vehicles, and: health information technology resources, such as systems for electronically managing patient records and electronically sharing information with other organizations. II. Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were properly stored in two out of six medication carts. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure the treatment and medication cart on Liberty lane was locked to prevent unauthorized entry; and, -Ensure the medication carts were free from loose tablets. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biologicals, Syringes and Needles policy, revised on 7/23/19, read in part, the facility would ensure that all medications and biologicals, including treatment items, are securely stored in a locked cabinet/cart or locked medication room. The facility would ensure medications and biologicals for each resident are stored in the containers in which they were originally received. Medications and biologicals that are damaged, missing labels, or worn would be destroyed. II. Failures A. Unlocked treatment cart observation and interviews -On 8/1/19 at 8:20 a.m.the treatment cart which contained medications was unlocked on the Liberty Lane unit. Inside the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner that maintained or enhanced quality of life for one (#8) of one resident reviewed for dignity out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff interacted with Resident #8 in a respectful and dignified manner. Findings include: A. Resident status Resident #8, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the August 2019 computerized physician orders (CPO) pertinent diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, chronic pain syndrome and unspecified hearing loss. The 7/10/19 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. He had short and long-term memory loss and never/rarely made decisions regarding tasks of daily life. The resident had moderate difficulty hearing but had clear speech. He rarely makes himself understood and rarely understood conversations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure for two (#27 and #37) of eight residents out of 39 sample residents had their physicians notified when the residents experienced significant changes which might require altered treatment. Specifically, the facility: -Failed to notify the provider of Resident #27's elevated blood glucose (BG) levels and multiple refusals of insulin; and, -Failed to notifiy the physician's and obtain orders for skin treatments after Resident #37 sustained a skin tear. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Change of Condition Notification policy and procedure, dated 6/2017, provided by the CRN on 8/5/19 at 12:33 p.m. read in part, to address any change of condition that may require further assessment, monitoring and treatment a physician should be notified of all occurrences. II. Resident #27 A. Resident status Resident #27, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the August 2019 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-06 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the services needed to maintain or improve the ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) for one (#57) of one resident reviewed for ADL decline out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to sufficiently address Resident #57's ADL decline following a significant change of condition. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Resident Rights policy, revised 8/14/15, read the facility must provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish unless circumstances of the individual's clinical condition demonstrate that such dimunition was unavoidable .A resident is given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out .activities of daily living . II. Resident #57 A.Resident status Resident #57, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the August 2019 computerized physician orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide services in an environment that was free from hazards for one (#2) of one resident reviewed for accidents and one (#84) of three residents reviewed for dining assistance out of 39 sample residents Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #2 was capable of using bedside medication safely; and, -Avoid potential choking hazards for Resident #84 when providing dining assistance. Findings include: I. Resident #2 A. Manufacturer's product information Soothe Hydration Lubricant Eye Drop safety data sheet: According to the Soothe Hydration Lubricant Eye Drop safety, drug facts and hazards, last updated February 2015, retrieved https://www.bausch.com/our-products/material-safety-data-sheets on 8/8/19, Keep tightly closed, store at room temperature of 15-25 degree Celsius (59-77 Fahrenheit) to maintain product integrity. Use before date marked on the container and or carton. Stop using and ask a physician if continued redness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were established and maintained to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (#32) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure medical equipment was clean to prevent the potential for respiratory infections. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Infection Control policy, revised September 2002, was provided by the clinical registered nurse (CRN) on 8/6/19.The policy read, in pertinent part, Nursing Service has a vital responsibility in the overall Infection Control Program. The nursing staff is essential in prevention, identification and management of infection. The continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) policy, dated 7/22/18, defined CPAP as a .pressure exhale applied during the respiratory cycle that helps keeps air passages open so that the next breath comes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in CO

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Colorado
$10,159/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,182/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,584/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 06A190. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next