No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Walsh Healthcare Center

150 N Nevada St, Walsh, CO 81090 · Government - Hospital district · 30 certified beds · (719) 324-5262 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Call the home — (719) 324-5262 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (17) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
411 Sunset St · (620) 624-1500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
27913 US-287 · (719) 523-6201 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
535 N Colorado St · (719) 324-5421 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Us Highway 287 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
103 E Maplewood St · (719) 324-5875

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.8%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.8%4.7%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.4%0.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%1.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.1%8.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.0%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.5%13.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.8%11.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.6%3.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.2%21.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.6%20.0%17.1%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.801.381.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.081.741.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. Inspectors cited this home for failing to submit its staffing data to CMS (F0851) — see the citation below; CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-10-16)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-24)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-10-16 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to electronically submit complete and accurate direct care staffing information.Specifically, the facility failed to submit to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) for the quarter (4/1/25 thru 6/30/25) due to staff errors. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Payroll Based Journal policy, implemented 1/1/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 10/16/25 at 10:27 a.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to electronically submit timely to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS.II. Record reviewThe CMS submission report, dated 10/9/25, revealed the facility failed to submit the required data for the quarter. III. Staff interviewThe human resource director (HRD) was interviewed on 10/16/25 at 1:15 p.m. The HRD said the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-10-16 · tag F0923 — widespread
    Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate outside ventilation by means of windows, or mechanical ventilation. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the exhaust fans in the shower room and resident bathrooms. Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, April 2021, retrieved on 10/21/25 from: https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/79150.pdf., Proper ventilation helps reduce the concentration of bioaerosols (bioaerosols consist of aerosols originated biologically such as metabolites, toxins, or fragments of microorganisms), which can be particularly important in nursing homes due to the presence of vulnerable adults. Good ventilation can improve the health and wellbeing of the residents by reducing infection risks and preventing respiratory issues. By ensuring proper ventilation, nursing homes can significantly enhance the safety and quality of life for their residents. II. Observations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-10-16 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide response, action and rationale to residents involved in group grievances. Specifically, the facility failed to effectively address, resolve and demonstrate the facility's response to grievances identified during resident council. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Resident and Family Grievance policy, revised 10/1/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 10/14/25. It read in pertinent part, In accordance with the resident's right to obtain a written decision regarding his or her grievance, the Grievance Official will issue a written decision on the grievance to the resident or representative at the conclusion of the investigation. The written decision will include at a minimum:The date the grievance was received, the steps taken to investigate the grievance, a summary of the pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the resident's concern(s), a statement as to whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed, any corrective action taken or to be taken by the facility as a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that its medication error rate was not greater than five percent (%).Specifically, the facility had a medication error rate of 48%, which was 12 errors out of 25 total opportunities for error. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Medication Administration Policy, revised 6/17/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 10/15/25 at 3:24 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Medications are administered by licensed nurses or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. Ensure that the six rights of medication administration are followed: right resident, right drug, right dosage, right route, right time, and the right documentation.Administer within 60 minutes before or after the scheduled time unless otherwise ordered by the physician. Medication administration timing twice a day at 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.II.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-16 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#7) of three residents reviewed received food and fluids prepared in a form designed to meet his or her needs out of 16 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Residents #7 was served a mechanically altered diet per physician's orders. Findings include:I. Resident #7A. Resident statusResident #7, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the October 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease and progressive neurological disorder (a condition that gradually damages and destroys parts of the nervous system). The 9/29/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairments with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of four out of 15. She required set up assistance for meals. The MDS assessment indicated the resident had signs and symptoms of a swallowing disorder to include coughing or choking during meals…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement an antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for two (#2 and #9) of three residents out of 16 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure clinical signs and symptoms of an infection were identified and/or culture results were obtained prior to the administration of antibiotics for Resident #9; and,-Ensure a system was in place to monitor Resident #2's prophylactic antibiotic use. Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), The Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes, Appendix B, 9/10/25, was retrieved on 10/20/25 from https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/media/pdfs/Consult-pharm-11by17poster-Urinary-Tract-P.pd.Antibiotics are frequently prescribed for prolonged duration for the prevention of infection or prophylaxis in nursing homes. While antibiotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and served under sanitary conditions in the kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Perishable foods were discarded after the date of expiration; and, -Perishable foods were labeled and dated. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the State Board of Health Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations (effective 1/1/19) retrieved 1/29/24 from https://cdphe.colorado.gov/environment/food-regulations it read in part, A date marking system that meets the criteria using a method approved by the Department for refrigerated, ready-to-eat, potentially hazardous food (time/temperature control for safety food) that is frequently re-wrapped, such as lunch meat or a roast. Marking the date or day of preparation with a procedure to discard the food on or before the last date or day by which the food must be consumed on the premises. Marking the date or day the original container is opened in a food establishment with a procedure to discard the food on or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-24 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months and must provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews for four of four certified nurse aides (CNAs) reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not provide inservice education based on the outcome of the performance reviews for CNA #1, #2, #3 and #4. Findings include: I. Record review CNA #1 (hired 5/4/11) had a performance review on 5/31/23. CNA #2 (hired 2/4/16) had a performance review on 3/15/23 CNA #3 (hired 6/1/2020) had a performance review on 1/16/24. CNA #4 (hired 9/20/21) had a performance review on 10/1/23. -The CNAs did not have an inservice education plans based on the outcome of the reviews. II. Interview The director of nursing (DON) was interviewed on 1/23/24 at 3:10 p.m. She said the identified aides had completed annual training, however, she did not know the aides needed to have inservice education plans developed from the annual performance review. She said she would ensure going forward the aides…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and observations, the facility failed to ensure residents consistently receive food prepared by methods that conserved nutritive value, palatable in taste, texture, appearance and temperature. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident food was palatable in taste, temperature, texture and appearance. Findings include: I. Resident interviews All residents were identified by facility and assessment as interviewable. Resident #8 was interviewed on 1/22/24 at 9:15 a.m. He said the food at the facility was alright but it was not very good. Resident #14 was interviewed on 1/22/24 at 9:21 a.m. She said the texture of the food was too hard for her and the food was often cold. Sometimes the food looked appealing and sometimes it did not. Resident #13 was interviewed on 1/22/24 at 9:40 a.m. He said the food was not very good but he ate it. There is no point in complaining about it. Resident #5 was interviewed on 1/23/24 at 10:02 a.m. She said the food did not taste appealing and was frequently cold. The food was either too mushy or too hard. II. Observations A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#12, #5 and #9) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications out of 11 sample residents were free from unnecessary drugs. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Have an effective method to track behaviors for efficacy of psychotropic medications for Residents #12, #5 and #9; and, -Obtain consent for psychotropic medications prior to administration for Residents #5 and #9. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Use of Psychotropic Medication policy, reviewed 10/4/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/24/24. It read in pertinent part, Residents are not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition, as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record, and the medication is beneficial to the resident, as demonstrated by monitoring and documentation of the resident's response to the medication. For psychotropic drugs that are initiated after admission to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 7 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide notification of a change in condition for three (#4, #5 and #14) out of 18 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Notify the provider of elevated blood sugars for Resident #4; and, -Notify the provider of missed medications for Resident #5 and #14. Findings include: I. Resident #4 A. Resident status Resident #4, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the September 2022 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, metabolic encephalopathy (brain disease), cardiac murmur, retention of urine, and disorder of bladder. According to the 6/15/22 minimum data set (MDS) assessment, the resident had moderate cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15. The resident had no behavioral symptoms. He required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, grooming and toilet use. B. Record review The care plan, initiated 7/6/21 and revised 7/14/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with accepted professional standards, in one of one medication carts and one of one medication storage rooms. Specifically, the facility: -Failed to date Tresiba insulin when opened; -Failed to discard tuberculin when expired; and, -Failed to discard an expired Advair inhaler. Findings include: I. Professional references According to the Tubersol package insert, retrieved [DATE] from: https://www.fda.gov/media/74866/download, A vial of TUBERSOL which has been entered and in use for 30 days should be discarded. Prescribing information for Advair diskus, retrieved [DATE] from https://gskpro.com/content/dam/global/hcpportal/en_US/Prescribing_Information/Advair_Diskus/pdf/ADVAIR-DISKUS-PI-PIL-IFU.PDF ADVAIR DISKUS should be stored inside the unopened moisture-protective foil pouch and only removed from the pouch immediately before initial use. Discard ADVAIR DISKUS 1 month…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions in one kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Appropriate hand hygiene by food service staff; -Cutting boards were free from deep scratches and stains; and, -Dishwasher maintained sufficient levels of sanitizing solution. Findings include: I. Improper hand hygiene A. Professional references According to the Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations (effective 1/1/19) pg.47, Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms immediately before engaging in food preparation including working with exposed food, clean equipment and utensils, and unwrapped single-service items and: -Before handling or putting on single use gloves for working with food, and between removing soiled gloves and putting on clean gloves. The Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations (effective 1/1/19) pg.46, details for appropriate hand cleaning procedure included: Food employees shall clean…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-29 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse was properly disposed of and the dumpster lid was closed to prevent harborage to pests and insects. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure trash in the kitchen lids were closed and not overflowing. Findings include: I. Professional reference The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (2019) the Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations, https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/DEHS_RetailFd_6CCR10102_RFFC_EffJan2019.pdf. It read in pertinent part; - Receptacles and waste handling units for refuse, recyclables, and returnable used with materials containing food residue and used outside the food establishment shall be designed and constructed to have tight-fitting lids, doors, or covers. - Cardboard or other packaging material that does not contain food residues and that is awaiting regularly scheduled delivery to a recycling or disposal site may be stored outside without being in a covered receptacle if it is stored so that it does not create a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#12) of 18 sample residents received the highest practicable treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. Specifically, the facility failed to elevate Resident #12's right leg as ordered by the provider Findings include: I. Resident #12 A. Resident status Resident #12, under [AGE] years old, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the September 2022 computerized physician order (CPO), diagnoses included demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (damage to nerve fibers in the brain), atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities to bilateral legs, and edema. The 8/24/22 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of five out of 15. No behaviors or refusal of care noted. She needed extensive assistance with transfers, toilet use, and personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to provide hearing assistive devices to a resident daily for one (#2) out of 18 sample residents. Specifically, the facility for Resident #2: -Failed to ensure hearing aids were applied daily; and, -Failed to care plan the use of hearing aids. Findings include: I. Resident status A. Resident #2 Resident #2, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the September 2022 computerized physician orders (CPO), the diagnoses included vascular dementia, delusional disorders, and macular degeneration. The 7/21/22 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment with a brief interview for a mental status score of 12 out of 15. No behaviors or refusal of care noted. She was identified as having minimal difficulty hearing. B. Record review The care plan, created on 7/20/22 and revised on 7/21/22, identified a communication problem related to minimal difficulty with hearing. Interventions included, -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible, and adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents were provided, for one (#16) of one resident reviewed for smoking out of 18 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide qualified supervision during smoking for a resident who required supervision. Findings include I. Facility policy The Smoking Policy, no revision date, provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 9/29/22 at 10:30 a.m. Designated smoking areas are located outside of the facility with ash trays available. To protect all residents, staff and others, it is important to ensure that residents leave all oxygen equipment inside the building prior to going out into any designated smoking area. Any oxygen equipment, even when turned off, is not to be near any resident who is smoking. Residents are not to smoke with oxygen on. Residents with oxygen are not to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in CO

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Colorado
$10,159/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,182/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,584/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 06A175. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-10-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next