Clear Creek Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 73.0 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.89 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-10-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one (#10) of four residents reviewed for accidents out of seven sample residents.Resident #10 was admitted on [DATE] for long term care with a diagnosis of dementia. According to the care plan, Resident #10 was determined to be a high fall risk. On 8/30/25 Resident #10 sustained an unwitnessed fall. The facility updated the resident's care plan to indicate he needed a one-to-one caregiver. However, on 9/3/25 Resident #10 sustained an unwitnessed fall when he was found on the floor in his room with a laceration to his head. Resident #10 was transported to the hospital for further evaluation. Resident #10 sustained a three to four millimeter left tentorial subdural hematoma (brain bleed) and posterior left tenth and eleventh rib fractures. The facility failed to ensure the person-centered interventions were consistently in place. After the fall on 9/325, it was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2021-08-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a dignified existence was provided for one (#40) of three residents reviewed out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to respond in a timely manner to Resident #40's requests for assistance after incontinence episodes and did not honor her request for a specific agency staff member to not work with her. Due to the agency staff member not providing timely incontinence care on one occasion in June 2021, the resident reported she felt embarrassed, that her health was being jeopardized and that her blood pressure increased. After the resident requested that agency staff member not work with her again, the agency staff member did work with the resident in July 2021. The resident requested to be changed by the agency staff member in July 2021 due to her skin becoming irritated. The agency staff member left the resident's room without providing care which made the resident feel like a second class citizen. Findings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for two (#2 and #1) of three residents reviewed for bathing out of three sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #2 and Resident #1, who were dependent on staff for bathing, received their scheduled showers. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Bathing/Shower policy, revised February 2018, was provided by the regional clinical resource (RCR) on 1/21/25 at 4:24 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The purpose of this procedure is to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and to observe the condition of the resident's skin. The documentation includes the date and time the shower/bath was performed, the name and title of the individual who assisted the resident with the shower, all the assessment data obtained during the shower,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-03-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure facility menus met the needs of residents and were followed. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure menu extensions were followed; and, -Ensure residents were provided with all menu options and substitutions were offered when appropriate. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Menus and Nutrition Adequacy policy and procedure, revised January 2024, was provided by quality mentor (QM) #1 on 3/21/24 at 2:19 p.m. It read in pertinent part: Menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated periodically and be reviewed by the facility's dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional for nutritional adequacy. The US Foods Detailed Menu Cycle Nutritional Analysis was provided by the facility on 3/21/24 at 9:03 a.m. It read in pertinent part: The facility offered a total of 2,000 Kcal (calorie) daily nutritional intake across all meals. Milk was to be offered at every meal, offering 118…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in a sanitary manner. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure kitchen staff prepared and served food in a sanitary environment in the main kitchen; and, -Ensure the two facility ice machines were properly cleaned and sanitized according to the manufacturer's instructions. Findings include: I. Ensure kitchen staff prepared and served food in a sanitary environment in the main kitchen A. Facility policy and procedure The Cleaning and Disinfection of Environmental Surfaces policy, revised August 2019, was provided by quality mentor (QM) #1 on 3/20/24 at 5:43 p.m. It documented in pertinent part: Environmental surfaces will be disinfected (or cleaned) on a regular basis daily and when surfaces are visibly soiled. Walls, blinds, and window curtains in resident areas will be cleaned when these surfaces are visibly contaminated or soiled. Horizontal surfaces will be wet dusted regularly using clean cloths moistened with an EPA-registered hospital disinfectant (or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0552 — pattern
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents were kept free from unnecessary medications for four (#15, #16, #33 and #76) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications out of 47 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure informed consents were signed prior to the administration of psychotropic medications for Residents #15, #16, #33 and #76. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedures The Psychopharmacological Policy, dated 3/10/23, was provided by quality mentor (QM) #1 on 3/20/24 at 12:42 pm. The policy revealed the community (facility) supported the appropriate use of psychopharmacological drugs that were therapeutic for residents suffering from mental illness. If a resident was admitted with orders for psychopharmacological drug use, the following would occur: a licensed nurse would review admission medication orders and ensure appropriate diagnosis for use of each medication from the primary care physician, the licensed nurse would…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were properly stored in accordance with professional standards on two of four medication carts. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Medications were labeled with the date opened; -Expired and discontinued medications were removed from the medication cart; and, -Labeled medications were legible. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Storage of Medications policy, revised [DATE], was provided by quality mentor (QM) #1 on [DATE] at 12:42 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part: The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. Drug containers that have missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels are returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storing. Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. II. Professional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection on two of three units. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure housekeeping staff followed appropriate infection control practices; -Ensure high touch areas were cleaned; -Ensure staff followed proper hand hygiene practices; -Ensure hand hygiene was offered to residents prior to meals; and, -Ensure Foley catheter bags were hung in a sanitary manner. Findings include: I. Failure to ensure housekeeping staff were following the proper cleaning techniques for cleaning resident rooms and disinfecting high frequency touched areas A. Professional reference Assadian O, Harbarth S, Vos M, et al. Practical Recommendations for Routine Cleaning and Disinfection Procedures in Healthcare Institutions: A Narrative Review. The Journal of Hospital Infection, (2021)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0559 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide written notification of room changes and roommate changes for two (#72 and #14) of four residents reviewed for notifications out of 47 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide timely written and/or verbal notification of room and/or roommate changes to Resident #72 and Resident #14 and/or their representatives. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Room Change and Room Change Notices policy, dated 11/4/23, was provided by quality mentor (QM) #1 on 3/21/24 at approximately 2:00 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part To ensure that residents are afforded their right to prior notification of room or roommate changes and the right to appeal these changes. Residents will be notified in advance of room or roommate changes and of their right to appeal these changes. The SSD/RSD (social service director/ resident service director) or designee will meet with the resident to explain the purpose of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (#29) of two residents reviewed for abuse out of 47 sample residents was kept free from abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #29 was kept free from physical abuse by Resident #27. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse policy, revised 5/3/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/17/24 at 5:13 p.m. It read in pertinent part: -Communities does not condone resident abuse and shall take every precaution possible to prevent resident abuse by anyone, including staff members, other residents, volunteers, and staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members, legal guardians, resident representative, sponsors, friends, or any other individuals. -Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including but not limited to facility staff, other residents,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) for two (#17 and #19) of two residents reviewed for ADLs out of 47 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #17 and #19 received showers as scheduled. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Bathing policy was provided by quality mentor (QM) #1 on 3/21/24 at 2:19 p.m. It read in pertinent part: The facility will try to bathe residents in their preferred way at their preferred times. II. Resident #17 A. Resident status Resident #17, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the March 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, hemiplegia (one sided paralysis), diabetes and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. The 2/14/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. He was independent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion (ROM) received the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or prevent a further decrease in their ROM for one (#36) of one resident reviewed for limited ROM out of 47 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #36 was provided with restorative services to maintain or prevent worsening of her right hand contracture (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin and nearby tissues that causes the joints to shorten and become very stiff). Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedures The Restorative Nursing Services policy, revised March 2018, was provided by quality mentor (QM) #1 on 3/21/24 at 2:19 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Restorative nursing care consists of nursing interventions that may or may not be accompanied by formalized rehabilitative services (physical, occupational or speech therapies). Residents may be started on a restorative…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $633K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO