Hillcrest Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 41.1 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY III. Resident #32 A. Resident status Resident #32, age of 93, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the March 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO) diagnoses included unspecified dementia, diabetes and history of falls. The 2/2/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of four out of 15. The resident required one-person assistance with transfers, dressing, walking, toilet use, bathing, and personal hygiene. The resident had unsteady balance but could stabilize themselves without assistance. The resident used a cane for ambulation. The MDS assessment marked the resident had no falls in the six months prior to admission. B. Observations Observations made from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on 3/27/23 through 3/30/23 revealed: Resident #32 was not checked on every two hours by staff, the resident's room was the last room on the hallway and the furthest from the nursing station, and the resident kept the door closed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2021-12-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a fall with injuries during facility transportation of one (#28) of three out of 23 sample residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #28 was provided safe transportation. Due to the facility ' s failures Resident #28 was loaded into the van and was not secured properly before being left unattended while the transportation driver left the residents side to open the door on the other side of the vehicle. Because of this failure the resident's wheelchair was unstable and rolled forward out of an open door and out of the van causing the resident to fall approximately three feet down out of the van, face-forward onto the asphalt. As a result of the fall, the resident was seen in the emergency room for assessment and treatment. The resident sustained the following injuries resulting in pain to both upper extremities, both lower extremities, back, hip, trunk and head; bruising to both upper extremities, both lower extremities, and face; and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the possible development and transmission of infectious diseases. Specifically the facility failed to ensure residents were offered hand hygiene before meals in both the dining room and during the delivery of room trays. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Hand Hygiene in Healthcare settings, revised 2/27/24, retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/handhygiene/index.html on 10/8/24, Patients and visitors should clean their hands before preparing or eating food. Cleaning your hands can prevent the spread of germs, including those that are resistant to antibiotics, and protects healthcare personnel and patients. Using an alcohol-based hand sanitizer is the preferred way for you to keep your hands clean. II. Facility policy and procedure The Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Level II preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) was completed for one (#27) of two residents out of 23 sample residents reviewed for PASRR to gain and maintain their highest practical medical, emotional, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a Level II PASRR was in place for Resident #1. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) policy, reviewed in [DATE], was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on [DATE] at 9:18 a.m. The policy revealed the facility would coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program to the maximum extent practicable to ensure the facility can meet the resident's needs prior to admission. If the Level I revealed, Refer for Level II this indicated that a Level II must be completed prior to admission. II. Resident status Resident #27, age greater than 65, was admitted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided services that meet professional standards for one (#1) of five residents out of 23 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1's insulin was administered according to the physician's orders. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Insulin Administration policy, revised September 2014, was provided by the nursing home administratior (NHA) on 10/2/24 at 12:32 p.m. The policy provided guidelines for the safe administration of insulin to residents with diabetes. The type of insulin, dosage requirements, strength, and method of administration must be verified before administration, to assure that it corresponded with the order on the medication sheet and the physician's order. The nurse should notify the DON and the attending physician of any discrepancies before giving the insulin. The Administering Medications policy, revised April 2019, was provided by the NHA on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with a feeding tube received appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for one (#26) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding out of 23 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #26's physician's orders were updated and accurate; and, -Ensure Resident #26's feeding tube was flushed to maintain patency (prevent clogging). Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Appropriate Use of Feeding Tubes policy, revised February 2023, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on [DATE] at 9:03 a.m It read in pertinent part, Feeding tubes (naso-gastric, gastrostomy, jejunostomy) will be utilized in accordance with current clinical standards of practice, with interventions to prevent complications to the extent possible. The plan of care will address the use of feeding tube, including strategies to prevent complications. II. Resident #26 A. Resident status…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to develop a maintenance program to ensure environmental concerns in the dish room, kitchen and serving area were identified and corrected in a timely manner. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Maintenance Inspection policy, reviewed on 4/13/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 10/2/24 at 12:21 p.m. The policy revealed the facility utilized a maintenance inspection checklist in order to assure a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. The director of maintenance services would perform routine inspections of the physical plant using the maintenance checklist (MC). The NHA, or designee, would perform random inspections of the physical plant using the MC. All opportunities would be corrected immediately by maintenance personnel. The facility should establish…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-16 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to address and/or act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations during resident council on issues of resident care and quality of life in the facility that were important to the residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident council grievances were addressed to resolve resident concerns related to residents being left in the dining room for up to an hour after meals, lack of staff in the dining room, inappropriate staff conversations, rude staff members and call light response times. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Resident and Family Grievance policy, dated 4/23/23, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/16/24 at 2:00 p.m. The policy documented in pertinent part, Grievances may be voiced in the following forums: Verbal complaint during resident council meetings.All staff involved in the grievance investigation or resolution should make prompt efforts to resolve the grievance and return the grievance form to the Grievance Official. Prompt efforts include…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the possible development and transmission of infectious diseases. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure professional standards of infection control were followed while cleaning resident rooms; -Ensure that different cleaning cloths were used to clean and disinfect different potentially contaminated surfaces; -Ensure housekeeping staff changed gloves and performed hand hygiene consistently when moving from a task where the staffs hand became contaminated form cleaning and or touching a contaminated surface within a resident's room before cleaning the next surface; -Ensure housekeeping staff cleaned and thoroughly cleaned all high-touch surfaces in resident rooms and followed manufacturer directions for thorough cleaning of a potentially contaminated surface during routine daily cleaning; -Ensure housekeeping staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a system of documenting grievances and demonstrating prompt action for residents. Specifically, the facility failed to effectively address, resolve and demonstrate the facility's response to: -Ongoing food and pest control concerns; and, -Grievances brought up in the resident council. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Grievance policy, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/30/23 at 11:02 a.m. It read it pertinent part, The social services director is responsible for overseeing the grievance process; receiving and tracking grievances through to their conclusion. Grievances may be voiced by verbal complaint during resident or family council meetings. The social services director or designee will keep the resident appropriately apprised of progress towards the resolution of the grievance. II. Resident interviews All residents were identified by facility and assessment as interviewable. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-30 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of pests and vermin. Specifically, the facility failed to utilize a method for pest control that was effective and sanitary. Findings include: I. Professional references According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, How to Trap and Remove Rodent Infestations, retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/healthypets/pets/wildlife/trap on [DATE], Glue traps (small board made of cardboard, fiberboard, or plastic that's coated with a sticky adhesive that ensnares any small animal who wanders across or lands on its surface) can increase a human's risk to exposure of diseases. Do not use glue traps or live traps. These traps can scare the rodents causing them to urinate, which can increase a human's chances of getting sick. In addition, glue traps were not included in the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) list of registered and recommended products to treat rodent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-30 · tag F0943 — pattern
  Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide training to their staff that at a minimum educate staff on activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property as set forth, procedures for reporting incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property and dementia management and resident abuse prevention. Specifically the facility failed to: -Provide annual abuse identification and prevention training for one of out of six certified nurse aides (CNA) reviewed; and, -Provide initial hire orientation and/or annual dementia management training for four out of six CNAs. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedures The Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, revised 2/27/2020, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/27/23 at 11:12 a.m., read in part: The facility will develop and implement written policies and procedures that: -Include training for new and existing staff on activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriate of resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$9,174 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $340K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO