Caleb Hitchcock Health Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 180 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.66 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 50.3 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.01 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.71 to 1.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to ensure Resident #6 who exhibited self-injurious behaviors (biting, gnawing and sucking), had a comprehensive care plan developed and interventions implemented to minimize the risk of injury. The facility's failure to develop a comprehensive care plan with individualized interventions to address self-injurious behaviors resulting in the development of an open area, progressing to osteomyelitis (a bone infection) and gangrene which required a partial right third finger amputation. These failures resulted in the finding of immediate jeopardy. Additionally, for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the resident care plan was comprehensive for Resident #1's history of fractures and seizures. The findings include: 1.Resident #6 was admitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE] with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2025-11-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to protect the skin of a resident with known behaviors of picking and gnawing at his/her fingers, failed to monitor the fingers after gnawing caused skin deterioration of the finger, failed to document an assessment when the fingers were noted with breakdown which resulted in Resident #6 developing osteomyelitis (a bone infection),and gangrene requiring a partial right third finger amputation. These failures resulted in the finding of Immediate Jeopardy. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE] with diagnosis that included a urinary tract infection, hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (there was no admitting diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease (PVD), diabetes or neuropathy). A progress note written by MD #3 prior to Resident #6's admission to the facility, obtained by the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2025-11-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure care was provided gently when staff repositioned Resident #1 and staff pulled on Resident #1's wrist to turn him/her in the bed. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of one out of fifteen, indicative of severe cognitive impairment, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, was dependent on staff for personal hygiene, and required maximal assistance with bed mobility. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 9/17/2025 identified incontinence, alteration in mobility, becomes easily agitated with occasional aggressive outbursts. Interventions directed two (2) staff for personal care, wrap a bath towel around quarter side rails to prevent injury when resistive or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-11-25 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy and interviews regarding the employment of an Infection Preventionist, the facility failed to designate an individual with the required training and certification to oversee the Infection Control Program. The findings include: Interview with the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) on 11/19/25 at 2:00 PM identified that she was designated as the Infection Preventionist (IP) in October 2025 until a new IP was hired to the position.Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #8 on 11/24/25 at 10:30 AM identified she was a full time RN-Designee at the Assisted Living Services Agency (another entity of the Long Term Care Facility) and was not actively a facility employee. RN #8 identified she had assisted the previous IP in the past around 2 times a week with training on support in her IP position but since the DNS took over coverage for the IP position, she only helped to answer questions periodically when the DNS called her. RN #8 identified that she did not review infection prevention documents and reports at the facility, and that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews regarding the facility Infection Control program, the facility failed to document Covid-19 staff effected on a line list, failed to document and complete Covid-19 testing per facility policy, and failed to provide facility-initiated education to non-nursing personnel related to Covid-19, The findings include: Review of a Department of Public Health (DPH) Facility Licensing and Investigations Section (FLIS) Resolution Report dated [DATE] identified the facility had a COVID -19 outbreak which was declared as resolved on [DATE] and involved 2 residents (Resident #6 and Resident #66) and 2 staff members.a. Review of the facility COVID-19 outbreak documentation for [DATE]-[DATE] failed to identify a line list for staff members. The nurse aide (NA) and Life Enrichment Director who tested positive for COVID-19 during the outbreak were not documented on a staff line list which would have documented their age, gender, primary floor assignment,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for the monitoring of neurological assessments following an unwitnessed fall. Additionally, for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice regarding completing a skin assessment when Resident #6 was observed to sustain bloody areas to the fingers of the right hand caused by the behaviors of sucking, biting and picking and failed to ensure routine skin assessments were completed by a Registered Nurse (RN) and not a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). The findings include: 1.Resident #1 had diagnoses that included epilepsy (seizure disorder), vascular dementia, and fracture of right sided skull and facial bones with routine healing. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, observations, interviews and facility policy for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #12) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure the alternating pressure mattress was set correctly. The findings include: Resident #12 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses that included dementia, osteoporosis, and mobility impairment. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] identified Resident #12 was severely cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for all of activities of daily living, required assistance of 2 for transfers with a mechanical lift, and was at risk for developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Additionally, the MDS identified Resident #12 did not have a pressure ulcer.The physician's orders (undated) directed to apply Triad paste (a zinc-based sterile wound dressing in paste form) to the coccyx two times a day, skin prep to bilateral heels twice a day, mechanical lift for transfers and weekly skin checks. The physician's orders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #4) reviewed for positioning and mobility, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order, develop a plan of care and provide staff education for a resident's lower extremity brace. The findings include: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses that included difficulty in walking, unsteadiness on feet and unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified Resident #4 had no cognitive impairment and was independent with toileting, bed mobility and transfers. The MDS further indicated Resident #4 required partial/moderate assistance with lower body dressing and had a diagnosis of weakness and difficulty in walking. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 8/27/25 identified Resident #4 required assistance with activities of daily living and had an AFO (Ankle-Foot-Orthosis)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, facility documentation and facility policy for 1 of 1 supply closets observed, the facility failed to ensure the nursing supply closet on the secured Memory Care unit was locked/secured. Review of the Resident Listing Report dated 11/18/25 indicated there were 12 residents living on the facility's secured Memory Care unit.An observation on the secured Memory Care unit on 11/18/25 at 10:30 AM identified the nursing supply closet was unlocked and contained 20 bottles of peri wash (8.1 ounces (oz) each), 24 bottles of non-alcohol mouthwash (4 oz each bottle), 22 bottles of body cream (5 oz in each bottle), 12 tubes of barrier cream, 25 bottles of body lotion (8 oz in each bottle). 40 fingernail clippers, 8 disposable razors, 2 containers of Sani cloth bleach wipes with 75 wipes in each, 5 containers of Sani cloth PDI- germicidal wipes with 160 wipes in each, 5 cans of shaving cream (11oz in each can), and 17 bottles of Purell hand sanitizers (12 oz. in each bottle).A second observation on 11/18/25 at 3:00 PM identified that the nursing supply closet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an allegation of abuse timely. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of one out of fifteen, indicative of severe cognitive impairment, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, was dependent on staff for personal hygiene, and required maximal assistance with bed mobility. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 9/17/2025 identified incontinence, alteration in mobility, becomes easily agitated with occasional aggressive outbursts. Interventions directed two (2) staff for personal care, wrap bath towel around quarter side rails to prevent injury when resistive or combative with care, use a calm approach and an unhurried manner when dealing with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation of the Dietary Department, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure cleanliness of the kitchen, a food items were labeled when opened, contained an expiration date, failed to failed to perform hand hygiene, and adequately store a chemical solution away from food. The findings include: Tour of the Dietary department on 1/18/24 at 10:32 AM and 1/23/24 at 12:16 PM with the Director of Dietary identified the following: 1a. A 1 gallon container that was 1/4 full of fresh, peeled garlic was observed to be located inside the reach in cooler and was noted to be opened but not labeled with the date of opening, contained a green substance inside the container and lacked an expiration date. b. A five gallon plastic container containing loose flour (almost full) was not dated to identify when the flour was placed into the container and failed to identify the expiration date. c. A five gallon plastic container containing loose sugar (approximately 3/4 full) was not dated to identify when the sugar was placed into the container and failed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-24 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — pattern
  Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, review of facility policy and interview for 2 of 5 resident living units, the facility failed to ensure that all residents, except those assessed to require a secured unit, were allowed to freely move off the unit or about the facility resulting in the finding of a pattern of involuntary seclusion. The findings included: Observation during tour on 1/18/24 noted that the exit doors to the resident care units, Elm, and Fir, were always locked and exiting required a security code. Although it was noted that some alert and oriented residents had been provided with the code to open the doors, other residents were unable to independently exit the unit. Interview with the Administrator and Director of Nursing on 1/24/24 at 11:40 AM identified the facility lacked policies and procedures for assessing which residents required living on a secure unit and that there was no facility documentation, in any resident's clinical record, for those residents residing on the locked units, indicating criteria for secured/locked area placement. The Administrator indicated the doors…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure laundry was handled in a clean manner. The findings include: During a tour of the soiled laundry area on 1/22/24 at 12:00 PM, two barrels, used to contain dirty linen, were in direct contact with a clean rack of personal clothing items that were under a mesh cover. In the clean laundry folding areas, two of the three ceiling intake valves were coated with a gray substance. Additionally, in the clean laundry area, one running fan, coated with a gray substance on the blades and the grill, was blowing directly on the table where clean linen was folded. Interview, observation, review of facility documentation, and review of facility policy on 1/22/24 at 12:08 PM with Laundry Operator #1, indicated that the facility policy was to keep clean and dirty laundry items separated (dirty laundry barrels from the clean personal clothing rack) and clean items should not be stored in the soiled linen area. Laundry Operator #1 identified that the gray substance on the ceiling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$47,216 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $15,106 — penalty dated 2025-11-25
• $32,110 — penalty dated 2025-11-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT