No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ark Healthcare & Rehabilitation At Branford Hills

189 Alps Road, Branford, CT 06405 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 190 certified beds · (203) 481-6221 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (203) 481-6221 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2026Resident-funds citation (F0565)1 actual-harm citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$8,021 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,021 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-24)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
1 Monticello Dr · (203) 481-0861 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
189 Alps Rd · (203) 315-2634 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1060 W Main St · (203) 481-9671 · Call to confirm hours
Park
14 Westwood Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.0%18.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.3%6.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.1%1.5%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.5%22.3%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.1%3.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.8%16.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.5%17.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.2%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.6%4.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.3%24.7%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.7%17.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.0%69.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.7%24.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.0%10.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.182.061.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.331.461.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 348 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

64.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.35U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 182 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF64.1%CMS range 57.2–69.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 8.0–12.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge42.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge46.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 5.7–10.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
0.78
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.34
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.75
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.40
RN hoursweekends
54.0%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 190 beds and averages 181.0 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-05)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2022-12-06)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1), reviewed for wandering, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision for a resident with known exit seeking behaviors, to ensure the resident was not able to exit the facility without staff knowledge, and the facility failed to ensure interventions were placed after elopement behaviors were identified. The failures resulted in a finding of Immediate Jeopardy. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included dementia and status post right hip fracture and malnutrition. An elopement assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was not an elopement risk and did not make active attempts to leave the facility at the time of the assessment. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 1 had moderately impaired cognition, had no wandering behavior in the prior seven (7) days, and required extensive assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, police reports, forensic laboratory findings and interviews for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #3) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to protect a cognitively impaired, non-verbal resident from sexual abuse by another resident. Resident #3 lacked the cognitive ability to consent to sexual activity and forensic DNA testing confirmed the presence of Resident #2's DNA on Resident #3's oral and genital swabs. The findings include:1. Resident #3 was admitted with diagnoses that included congenital malformation syndrome predominantly affecting facial appearance, dementia, aphasia, intellectual developmental disability, dysphagia, autistic disorder, and speech disturbance. Resident #3 had a Power of Attorney (POA) for care.The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had short-term and long-term memory impairment (not capable of completing a brief interview for mental status exam), severely impaired cognitive skills for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-05 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — pattern
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #57) reviewed for activities of daily living, the facility failed to ensure podiatry services were provided timely. The findings include: Resident #57 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, onychomycosis (fungal infection of the toenails), and left and right toe pain. A Physician Consult Form dated 1/30/24 and signed by Resident #57 identified he/she agreed for podiatry services contracted by the facility. A podiatry consult form dated 3/20/25 identified Resident #57 had moderately aching, painful toenails in shoes and with pressure and walking which was alleviated by cutting nails out. Treatment was rendered as appropriate with the aim of allowing the resident to ambulate and use shoes without pain. Follow-up was indicated to occur in 2-3 months. A physician's order dated 7/25/25 and currently in effect directed a podiatry consult…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a tour of the Dietary Department, review of facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure stored food was dated when opened, expired food was discarded, and a cleaning chemical was not stored in a refrigerator designated for resident food. The findings included: A tour of the Dietary Department on 1/27/26 at 10:31 AM with the Food Service Director (FSD) identified:1. The walk-in freezer was observed to have the following items with open boxes that contained opened plastic bags within the boxes that were undated when they were opened:a. One opened plastic bag of riblets (1/4 full)b. One opened plastic bag of onion rings (1/2 full)c. One opened plastic bag of pork chops (1/2 full)d. One opened plastic bag of hamburger patties (3/4 full)e. One opened plastic bag of fish cakes (3/4 full)f. One opened plastic bag of meatballs (1/2 full)g. One opened plastic bag of stuffed shells (1/2 full)h. One opened plastic bag of French Toast sticks (3/4 full) 2. In Reach in Cooler #3, the following items were being stored in the refrigerator and were not dated when they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, review of the clinical record and facility policy for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for transmission-based precautions, the facility failed notify the resident of the need and reason for isolation precautions and the facility failed to ensure isolation precautions were maintained for a resident with an undiagnosed respiratory illness. Additionally, for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #124) reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), the facility failed to donn (wear) the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during care of a gastrostomy tube, and for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #144) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure infection control standards of practice were followed during a dressing change. The findings include: 1.Resident #3's diagnoses included an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system, gastrostomy status, and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical record, interviews and facility policy for one sampled resident reviewed for skin conditions ( Resident #13) the facility failed to measure a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line to assess for possible migration according to the plan of care and for 2 of 6 (Resident #41 and Resident #58) residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs), the facility failed to ensure the care plan was comprehensive to include refusals for shaving for Resident #41 and trimming of fingernails for Resident #58. The findings include: Resident #13's diagnoses included osteomyelitis of the left ankle and foot, severe sepsis, and bacteremia.An Inter-Agency referral report (W-10) from the hospital) and dated 12/15/25 identified Resident #13 had a double lumen left basilic vein (medial side of arm) PICC line inserted on 11/28/25.A nursing progress note dated 12/15/25 at 1:47 PM identified Resident #13 was admitted to the long-term care facility with osteomyelitis of the right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 2 residents (Resident #15, Resident #104), the facility failed to ensure medication was administered timely. The findings include: 1. Resident #15 had diagnoses that included dementia, pelvis fracture, and anxiety.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/29/25 identified Resident #15 was at risk for malnutrition related to variable food intake with requirement for oral nutritional supplements, significant weight change and advanced age. Interventions included to obtain a dietary consultation as needed, monitor weights as ordered, document amount of meal consumed for breakfast, lunch, and dinner, notify the nurse if Resident #15 refused a meal, and offer alternative foods.The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #15 was severely cognitively impaired, weighed 127 pounds (lbs.), used a walker and wheelchair for mobility, and had 1 fall with a major injury since the prior assessment.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 2 residents observed utilizing an air mattress (Resident #14 and Resident #124), the facility failed to ensure the air mattresses were set according to physician orders and for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #186) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to follow physician orders regarding obtaining vital signs. The findings include: 1. Resident #14 had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and anxiety. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #14 was severely cognitively impaired, had 1 unhealed Stage 4 pressure ulcer, had a pressure reducing device for the bed, was dependent for eating and transfers, and required substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility. Additionally, the MDS identified Resident #14 weighed 87 pounds. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/17/25 identified Resident #14 had a Stage 4 pressure ulcer to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, review of the clinical record and facility policy, for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #144) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure a treatment was ordered timely when a pressure ulcer was identified. The findings include:Resident #144 was admitted to the facility in November 2025 with diagnoses that included elevated white blood cells, a terminal condition of the colon and depression. A Braden Scale (a tool to determine the risk for developing a pressure ulcer) completed on 11/2/25 identified Resident #144 was at risk for a pressure ulcer with a score of 17 (Braden scores- at risk 15-18, moderate risk 13-14, high risk 10-12, and very high risk 9 or below). Physician orders dated 11/2/25 directed to perform skin checks weekly on Thursdays to check skin integrity. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/5/25 identified Resident #144 was a risk for alteration in skin related to decreased mobility. Interventions included to complete a Braden Scale on admission and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility policy, record review, and interviews for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #95) observed with medication at the bedside, the facility failed to properly secure the medication and for 6 residents interviewed (Resident #5, Resident #32, Resident #33, Resident #40, Resident #93, and Resident #106), the facility failed to ensure the wheels on the bed were in the locked position, causing one of the residents (Resident #33) to sustain a laceration during an independent transfer. The findings include: 1. Resident #95's diagnosis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bipolar disorder and anxiety. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated 1/26/26 identified Resident #95 was cognitively intact and was dependent on toileting. The MDS further identified Resident #95 required assistance for eating, substantial maximal assistance for oral hygiene, bathing and partial moderate assistance for upper body dressing. The Resident Care Plan dated 1/27/26 identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policy, facility documentation, and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #15) reviewed for nutrition the facility failed to ensure a re-weight was obtained timely to identify a significant weight loss The findings include: Resident #15 had diagnoses that included dementia, pelvis fracture, and anxiety.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #15 was severely cognitively impaired, weighed 127 pounds (lbs.), used a walker and wheelchair for mobility, and had 2 or more falls with no injury since the prior assessment. Additionally, the MDS assessment identified Resident #124 required setup or clean-up assistance with eating, supervision or touching assistance with bed mobility, and partial/moderate assistance with transfers.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) 12/29/25 identified Resident #15 was at risk for malnutrition related to variable food intake with requirement for oral nutritional supplements, significant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and facility policy for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #124) reviewed for tube feeding, the facility failed to ensure a tube feeding was initiated on time and failed to ensure gastric-tube (g-tube) length was verified prior to administration of tube feeding per physician orders. The findings include: Resident #124 had diagnoses that included diabetes, dementia, and congestive heart failure.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #124 was severely cognitively impaired, had a feeding tube, required a therapeutic mechanically altered diet, and received 51% or more of his/her total calories through the feeding tube. The MDS assessment further identified Resident #124 used a wheelchair, and was dependent for eating, bed mobility, and chair/bed transfers.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) 12/15/25 identified Resident #124 had a feeding tube in place to assist with maintaining nutritional status due to inadequate oral intake. Interventions included check…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, review of facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was set at the appropriate setting per physician orders. The findings include: Resident #13's diagnoses included COPD, respiratory failure with hypercapnia (abnormally elevated level of carbon dioxide in the blood), emphysema, and pneumonia. Physician orders dated 12/15/25 and currently in effect directed Oxygen at 2 liters/minute via nasal cannula. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] was moderately cognitively impaired and was dependent with toileting, transfers and bed mobility. The MDS indicated Resident #13 had a diagnosis of COPD and respiratory failure and was receiving oxygen therapy. A Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/8/26 identified Resident #13 had COPD, respiratory failure and was on continuous oxygen (O2). Interventions included to provide O2 at 2 liters via nasal cannula at all times…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled according to professional standards and failed to ensure controlled narcotic medications were stored under double lock at all times. The findings include, a. Review of the controlled medications with the DNS on 2/5/26 at 11:50 AM identified 3 Morphine Sulfate 100mg/ml bottles containing 4 cc, 9 cc and 24 cc and 2 bottles of Lacosamide 10 mg/ml containing 100 ml and 300 ml. Additionally, 22 separate medication blister packets identified to be Ativan 0.5mg (29 tablets), Ativan 0.5mg (20 tablets), Ativan 0.5 (2 tablets), Morphine 15mg (27 tablets), Tramadol 50 mg 1(0 tablets), Valium 2mg (18 tablets), Ritalin 10 mg (5 tablets), Ritalin 5mg (17 tablets), Oxycodone 5 mg (30 tablets), Oxycodone 5 mg (28 tablets), Oxycodone 5mg (26 tablets), Oxycodone 5mg (18 tablets), Oxycodone 5mg (9 tablets), Oxycodone 5mg (30 tablets), Oxycodone 5mg (22 tablets), Oxycodone 5mg (22 tablets), Oxycodone 15mg (9 tablets), Oxycodone 15 mg (30 tablets), Oxycodone 20 mg (12 tablets),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to provide adaptive equipment at mealtime per the physician's order. The findings include:Resident #5's diagnoses included dementia, essential tremor, and unspecified lack of coordination. A physician's order dated 11/18/25 and currently in effect directed red foam on utensils during mealtime at all meals. A Comprehensive Nutritional assessment dated [DATE] and completed by the Registered Dietician (RD) identified Resident #5 was at risk of malnutrition related to a therapeutic diet and chronic diseases and to continue to encourage intake of all meals. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #5 was cognitively intact and required substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility, toileting, and transfers. The MDS indicated Resident #5 required setup or clean-up assistance with eating and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure the provider was notified for each missed administration of insulin. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus, end stage renal disease and morbid obesity. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] directed to administer Humulin R U-500 injectable pen 40 units daily before dinner. A physician's order dated 7/21/25 directed to administer Humulin R U-500 units per milliliter (concentrated) inject 40 units subcutaneously in the evening. The admission Nursing assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was alert and oriented to person, place, time and situation. The Resident Care Plan dated 7/23/25 identified Resident #1 has a diagnosis of diabetes and was at risk for hyperglycemia (elevated blood sugar) and/or hypoglycemia (low blood sugar).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents #1) who was a new admission and reviewed for medication orders, the facility failed to collaborate with the pharmacy to ensure a medication was clarified and delivered to the facility to prevent the resident from missing four (4) days of insulin. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus, end stage renal disease and morbid obesity. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] directed to administer Humulin R U-500 injectable pen 40 units daily before dinner. A physician's order dated 7/21/25 directed to administer Humulin R U-500 units per milliliter (concentrated) inject 40 units subcutaneously in the evening. The admission Nursing assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was alert and oriented to person, place, time and situation. The Resident Care Plan dated 7/23/25 identified Resident #1 has a diagnosis of diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1), reviewed for wandering, the facility failed to ensure that the family and APRN were notified of an application of a wander guard (security bracelet) due to exit seeking behaviors. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included dementia and status post right hip fracture and malnutrition. An elopement assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was not an elopement risk and did not make active attempts to leave the facility at the time of the assessment. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 1 had moderately impaired cognition, had no wandering behavior in the prior seven (7) days, and required extensive assistance with one (1) staff for locomotion on the unit and for dressing. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 8/20/2024 identified Resident #1 was at risk for falls, was on anticoagulant therapy and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1), reviewed for wandering, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for a resident with known wandering behaviors. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included dementia and status post right hip fracture and malnutrition. An elopement assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was not an elopement risk and did not make active attempts to leave the facility at the time of the assessment. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 1 had moderately impaired cognition, had no wandering behavior in the prior seven (7) days, and required extensive assistance with one (1) staff for locomotion on the unit and for dressing. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 8/20/2024 identified Resident #1 was at risk for falls, was on anticoagulant therapy and had impaired thought processes.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and interview for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to complete weekly wound assessments in accordance with facility policy. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included scoliosis and difficulty in walking. An admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severely impaired cognition, was dependent for ADLs, was always incontinent, was at risk for pressure ulcer/injury, and had a Stage 2 pressure ulcer. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/10/2024 identified Resident #1 had a potential for alteration in skin integrity and had a pressure injury on the coccyx. Interventions directed to inspect skin for breakdown, pressure reducing cushion and mattress, and monitor for signs of infection. The nursing note dated 5/31/2024 at 3:49 PM identified a Stage 2 wound was noted on Resident #1's coccyx, measuring 2.5 centimeters (cm) by 1 cm by 0.1 cm. A physician's order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for medication administration, (Resident #2), the facility failed to ensure the resident was administered the correct dose of medication which resulted in a medication error. The findings include: Resident #2 had diagnoses that included dementia, heart failure, and hypothyroidism. A physician's order dated 10/27/2022 directed to administer Levothyroxine (Synthroid) 50 micrograms (MCG) ( a medication used to treat thyroid disorders) orally one (1) time a day. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had moderately impaired cognition and required moderate assistance with activities of daily living. The care plan dated 6/6/2024 identified Resident #2 has a diagnosis of hypothyroid and is receiving Synthroid (Levothyroxine) with interventions that directed to administer thyroid replacement therapy as ordered by the MD/APRN and monitor and document effectiveness.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #2) reviewed for laboratory services, the facility failed to ensure the physician's ordered blood work was obtained. The findings include: Resident #2 had diagnoses that included dementia, heart failure, and hypothyroidism. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had an active diagnosis of hypothyroidism. The care plan dated 6/6/2024 identified Resident #2 has a diagnosis of hypothyroid and is receiving Synthroid (Levothyroxine) as ordered by the physician/APRN. Interventions directed to administer thyroid replacement therapy as ordered by the MD/APRN, monitor and document effectiveness, and obtain lab/diagnostic work as ordered report results to MD/APRN. Review of the Physician Assistant's (PA) note dated 6/11/2024 at 9:51 A.M. he identified Resident #2 has continued on Synthroid 50 MCG orally daily for hypothyroidism however found to have under suppressed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review and interviews for one of two residents (Resident #2) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure staff utilized leg rests when moving a wheelchair dependent resident to prevent an injury. The finding included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia (Alzheimer's disease), spinal stenosis, and history of falling. An annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance for transfers, bed mobility, personal hygiene, and mobility. A Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 5/20/2021 identified Resident #1 was at risk for falls due to a decline in mobility with impaired gait and balance problems. The RCP directed to transfer out of bed into wheelchair. A facility reportable event report dated 8/2/2021 at 3:00 PM identified Resident #2 was being transported by recreation staff in his/her wheelchair when Resident #2 put…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one of five sampled residents (Resident #2) who were dependent on staff with getting in and out of the bed and chair, the facility failed to utilize safety measures, a gait belt and rolling walker during a two (2) person stand-pivot transfer into the wheelchair to prevent a healing skin tear from reopening. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included generalized muscle weakness, abnormal gait and mobility, history of stroke, anxiety, and long-term use of anticoagulants. The physical therapy evaluation dated 4/2/24 identified Resident #2 was receiving physical therapy services five (5) times a week for thirty (30) days. The evaluation indicated Resident #2 required maximum assistance of two (2) with sit to stand and bed to chair transfers. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 made reasonable and consistent decisions regarding tasks of daily living, required maximum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an accurate record of the dishwasher temperature. The findings include: Observation on 11/29/22 at 11:04 AM with the Nutrition Director in the kitchen identified the November 2022 dish machine temperature log had been completed, in advance, for the date of 11/29/22 for lunch, and supper. Interview on 11/29/22 at 11:05 AM with the Nutrition Director identified he was not aware that the dish machine temperature log had been filled out for lunch and supper. The Nutrition Director indicated that the Food & Nutrition Staff should not have fill out the lunch and supper column ahead of time. Interview on 12/5/22 9:55 AM with Food & Nutrition Staff #1 identified he was the one that filled out the dish machine temperature log, in advance, for lunch and supper on 11/29/22. Food & Nutrition Staff #1 indicated he does not have an answer to why he filled out the lunch and supper column in advance. Review of the facility dish room procedures identified log temperatures: #1 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #118) reviewed for discharge planning, the facility failed to ensure a second interdisplinary discharge care plan meeting, requested by the resident due to questions and concerns, took place. The findings include: Resident #118 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included fracture of the shaft of the humorous and Parkinson's disease. A physician's order dated 10/29/22 directed to use a mechanical lift (Sara lift) with assist of 2. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #118 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and personal hygiene. The care plan dated 12/1/22 identified Resident #118 had a self-care deficit due to decreased strength, balance, activity tolerance and endurance, inability to use the left upper extremity due to a fracture obesity, pain and Parkinson's. Interventions included to provide assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #14 and 50) who required assistance with care, the facility failed to ensure the call bell was within reach. The findings include: 1. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included overactive bladder, repeated falls, and diabetes. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #14 had mildly impaired cognition, was occasionally incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel and required limited assistance with transfers and locomotion in the wheelchair and required extensive assistance for toileting and personal hygiene. The care plan 10/27/22 identified Resident #14 was hard of hearing in the right ear. Interventions included to provide a safe environment with the call bell in reach. Interview with Resident #14 on 11/29/22 at 11:23 AM indicated he/she was not able to find the call light and he/she needed it because he/she needs to go…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #118) reviewed for discharge planning, the facility failed to honor the resident's choice/request of being dressed, out of bed and ready to attend his/her discharge care plan meeting with the interdisciplinary team. The findings include: Resident #118 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included fracture of the shaft of the humorous and Parkinson's disease. A physician's order dated 10/29/22 directed to use a mechanical lift (Sara lift) with assist of 2. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #118 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and personal hygiene. The care plan dated 12/1/22 identified Resident #118 had a self-care deficit due to decreased strength, balance, activity tolerance and endurance, inability to use the left upper extremity due to a fracture obesity, pain and Parkinson's. Interventions included to provide assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #122) reviewed for an allegation of mistreatment, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from abuse. The findings include: Resident #122 was admitted to the facility in June 2022 with diagnoses that included overactive bladder and a neurologic disorder. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #122 had intact cognition, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing toilet use and was totally incontinent of bowel and bladder. The care plan dated 8/2/22 identified Resident #122 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Interventions included to check and change the resident a minimum of every 2 - 3 and as needed for incontinence. Keep skin clean and dry, provide good peri care, and use barrier cream. Offer frequent use of the bathroom, commode or bedpan upon waking, before/after meals, before bed and upon request. Provide peri care after each incontinent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #387) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state agency. The findings include: Resident #387 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder, muscle weakness and osteoporosis. The care plan dated 11/16/22 identified Resident #387 had a self-care performance deficit related to cognitive deficit, recent hospitalization, weakness, sepsis and COVID19. Interventions included to have 2 caregivers provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) due to accusatory behavior. A physician's order dated 11/17/22 directed to stand-pivot transfer with 2 caregivers to toilet with grab bar and gait belt and provide increased time. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #387 had intact cognition, required extensive 2-person assistance with toileting, was frequently incontinent of bladder and always…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record and interview for 1 resident (Resident #69), the facility failed to ensure the Registered Nurse stayed with the resident to ensure the resident consumed medications prior to the RN leaving the room. The findings include: Resident #69's diagnoses included a degenerative nerve disease, major depressive disorder, and macular degeneration. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #69 had intact cognition and required total 2-person assistance for transfers and extensive 2-person assistance for bed mobility. The MDS further identified Resident #69 required extensive assistance dressing and toilet use. The care plan dated 10/13/22 identified Resident #69 had a diagnoses of a degenerative nerve disease with interventions that included to administer medications as ordered by the physician/APRN. Additional interventions included to follow up with neurology and specialized clinics as ordered. Review of the electronic physician order details dated 10/27/22 directed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #90) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL), the facility failed to ensure the resident was provided a shower on scheduled shower days. The findings include: Resident #90 was admitted to the facility in October 2018 with diagnoses that included diabetes and obesity. Review of the nurse aide care card identified bath days were scheduled Friday 7:00 AM - 3:00 PM and Wednesday 3:00 PM - 11:00 PM. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #90 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. The care plan dated 9/14/22 identified Resident #90 had a self-care deficit due to impaired strength and decreased ability. Resident #90 enjoy showers very much, receives an additional shower on Wednesdays, and allow the resident to hold sprayer. Resident #90's representative often visits to assist on shower days. Physician's order dated 10/1/22 directed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-06 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #14) reviewed for hearing services, facility failed to ensure the resident was seen by an audiologist in a timely manner. The findings include: Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included overactive bladder, repeated falls, and diabetes. The hospital interagency report dated 7/18/22 identified Resident #14 was transferred from the hospital to the facility with a hearing aid for the right ear. The admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] at 10:30 AM identified Resident #14 was alert and oriented, was able to make needs known and was hard of hearing in the right ear. The nurse's note dated 7/18/22 at 4:58 PM identified that Resident #14 was alert and oriented, was hard of hearing in right ear and had no hearing aid. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #14 had moderately impaired cognition, had minimal hearing difficulty and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #50) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure the air mattress was on the correct setting according to the residents weight. The findings include: Resident #50 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia, muscle weakness, bullous pemphigoid, and heart failure. A weights summary dated 2/13/22 identified Resident #50 weighed 120 lbs. A weights summary dated 10/5/22 identified Resident #50 weighed 129.6 lbs. Physician's monthly orders for October 2022 directed an air mattress with the setting at #3. Check for placement and function every shift. A weights summary dated 10/5/22 identified Resident #50 weighed 129.6 lbs. The APRN progress note dated 10/17/22 indicated Resident #50 requires total care, was non-ambulatory, and needs to be fed by staff. A weights summary dated 11/1/22 identified Resident #50 weighed 128.8 lbs. The November…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policy and interview for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #67) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure the prescribed supplement was monitored and the amount consumed was documented per physician's orders, for a resident at risk for weight loss. The findings include: Resident #67's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia, and iron deficiency anemia. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #67 had severely impaired cognition and required supervision, oversight, encouragement or cuing with eating. A physician's order dated 8/11/22 directed to start house supplement 4 ounces (oz) three times daily (TID). The care plan dated 8/16/22 identified nutritional status was at risk for decline secondary to impaired mobility, cognition, dysphagia, and weakness. Interventions included to obtain weights as ordered, house supplement three times daily, supplements as ordered to augment intake as ordered by MD/APRN and nursing to document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-06 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility policy and interview for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #79) reviewed for enteral tube feeding, the facility failed to ensure water bolus physician orders were consistent, failed to ensure appropriate labeling of tube feeding solution and water bolus bag, and failed to ensure cleanliness of the tube feeding pump. The findings include: Resident #79's diagnoses included stroke with left sided hemiparesis, dysphagia and utilization of a gastrostomy (g-tube). The care plan dated 6/30/22 identified Resident #79 was at risk for a decline in nutritional status due to a stroke and orders for nothing by mouth (NPO)/tube feeding. Interventions included dietary consultation as needed, g-tube feedings and flushes as ordered. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #79 had severely impaired cognition, required total assistance of 2 staff with bed mobility, transfers, dressing and toilet use. The MDS further identified Resident #79 required total assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #127) reviewed for respiratory services, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders related to oxygen administration and failed to ensure oxygen tubing and nebulizer tubing were labeled and dated per facility policy. The findings include: Resident #127 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pneumonia, and covid-19. The significant change in condition MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #127 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance for bed mobility, dressing, toileting, and personal. Additionally, the resident required oxygen therapy. The care plan dated 9/15/22 identified the resident had congestive heart failure. Interventions included to administer oxygen at 2 liters per minute continuously, administer nebulizer treatments as ordered and to change oxygen tubing as per policy. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #14) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure the nurse used infection control practices according to professional standards during medication administration. The findings include: Resident #14 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included overactive bladder, repeated falls, and diabetes. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #14 had moderately impaired cognition, was occasionally incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel and required limited assistance with transfers. The care plan dated 10/27/22 identified Resident #14 had a diagnosis of hypertension and diabetes. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered by the physician. Observation on 12/1/22 at 9:13 AM identified after RN #2 left a resident's room, she moved the medication cart across the hallway, and without the benefit of hand hygiene,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an observation, a review of the clinical record, staff interviews, and a review of the facility policy, for one sampled resident (Resident #95) reviewed for oxygen administration, the facility failed to change the oxygen tubing in accordance with the physician's orders. The findings include: Resident #95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure, chronic diastolic heart failure and cerebral infarction. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified intact cognition, and extensive assistance with personal hygiene, dressing, bed mobility, transfers, and ambulation. The care plan dated 11/26/19 identified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure, interstitial pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, chronic heart failure and a history of transient ischemic attacks as problems, with a goal of stable cardiopulmonary function as evidenced by the absence of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-02-05 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to provide follow-up to residents in attendance at Resident Council meetings related to resident concerns and failed to attempt alternative measures with a re-occurring issue. The findings include: A Resident Council meeting was conducted as part of the re-certification survey on 1/29/26 at 2:25 PM and attended by 7 residents (Resident #5, Resident #32, Resident #40, Resident #83, Resident #93, Resident #106, and Resident #176). Interviews with the residents in attendance at the meeting on 1/29/26 at 2:25 PM identified if they brought a concern forward to staff at a Resident Council meeting, they would not know if the concern was addressed, and they just assume it wasn't. The meeting identified the concern related to nursing staff being on their phones even during care and often through use of ear buds was so widespread that they no longer speak to the nurses to point out specific staff members who were performing this practice, but that it had been brought forth multiple times in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-02-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews for 1 of 6 shower rooms, the facility failed to ensure the shower room was kept in a clean manner. The findings included: An observation during the initial facility tour of the second floor Ledgewood 2 shower room on 1/27/26 at 10:40 AM identified the following:a. The paint on the ceiling was chipping away and cracked.b. There was a black/brown substance on the floors, and walls,c. 1 used white, wet wash cloth was observed on the floor in the shower area.Interview and observation made with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 on 1/29/26 at 11:30 AM of the Ledgewood 2 shower room, identified that environmental rounds were completed every other week and that the black substance on the floors/walls was dirt, grout or caulk. LPN #3 further identified the grout or caulk needed to be replaced and the shower was not clean.Interview and observation with the Maintenance Director on 1/29/26 at 11:35 AM identified Ledgewood 2 shower room ceiling needed to be repainted because the paint was peeling. Also, identifying the brown/black substance was glue for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-08-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents #1) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to document in the clinical record when the medication was not available and what interventions were initiated. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus, end stage renal disease and morbid obesity. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] directed to administer Humulin R U-500 injectable pen 40 units daily before dinner. A physician's order dated 7/21/25 directed to administer Humulin R U-500 units per milliliter (concentrated) inject 40 units subcutaneously in the evening. The admission Nursing assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was alert and oriented to person, place, time and situation. A physician's order dated 7/22/25 directed to discontinue Humulin R U-500 units per milliliter (concentrated) inject 40 units subcutaneously in the evening and administer Humulin-R…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,021 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-07-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FRIED, AKIVAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER17%since 06/30/2022
SODDEN, AARONIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER17%since 06/30/2022
WIESEL, ALLANIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER17%since 06/30/2022
STEIN, ALLENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/30/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$26.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.6M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 17%Other / private 14%

This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$429per resident / day
operating cost
$13,046per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$479per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Connecticut
$15,208/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,118/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075296. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next