Springs At 3030 Park, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 119 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.81 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 41% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 23 beds and averages 21.2 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.01 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.89 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.26 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.33 to 1.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one of four sampled residents (Resident #1) who required staff assistance with getting in and out of the bed and chair, via a mechanical lift, the facility failed to ensure a proper transfer to prevent a fall that resulted in Resident #1 sustaining bilateral femur fractures. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia, cervical spine spondylopathy, depression, respiratory failure, and aphasia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 rarely or never made decisions regarding tasks of daily life, required assistance of two (2) staff members with getting in and out of the bed and chair, and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. The Resident Care Plan dated [DATE] identified activities of daily living self-care performance deficit related to dementia and limited mobility. Interventions directed to provide assistance of two (2) staff members for turning and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-07 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — pattern
  Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 3 of 3 residents (Residents # 7, 12, and 16) reviewed for dental services, the facility failed to offer routine dental services to long-term care residents, per the facility policy. The findings include: 1. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility in 9/2024 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease and protein-calorie malnutrition. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #7 had severely impaired cognition and was not edentulous (lacking teeth). The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #7 did not have mouth or facial pain, discomfort or difficulty with chewing. The care plan dated 11/17/25 failed to reflect Resident #7's need for routine dental services. Review of the clinical record failed to reflect Resident #7 had been offered or had received routine dental services or that Resident #7 or Resident #7's representative had refused routine dental services from 9/2024 through 1/2026, 16 months. 2. Resident #12 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interview for 1 resident (Resident #30) reviewed for staff to resident altercation, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from abuse. The findings include:Resident #30 was admitted to the facility in July 2025 with diagnoses that included nondisplaced fracture of the fifth cervical vertebra, concussion and edema of cervical spinal cord, and cervical disc disorder at C5-C6 level.The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #30 had intact cognition and was dependent with personal hygiene. Additionally, Resident#30 had no verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others (e.g., threatening others, screaming at others, cursing at others).The reportable event form dated 10/21/25 at 11:00 AM identified Resident #30 was alert and oriented. NA #3 came into Resident #30's room while the resident had a visitor and became loud speaking about personal issues. Resident #30 asked NA #3 to leave. Two other staff members…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 3 of 3 resident (Resident #3, 28, and 32) reviewed for transmission based precautions, the facility failed ensure that appropriate signage was posted for Resident #3 who was on contact precautions, failed to ensure nursing staff adhered to appropriate infection control techniques for Resident #28, who was on droplet precautions, and failed to ensure nursing staff adhered to appropriate infection control techniques for Resident #32 who was on enhanced barrier precautions. The findings include: 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in December 2025 with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, dysphagia, and urinary retention.The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified that Resident #3 had intact cognition, was frequently incontinent of bowel, required an indwelling urinary catheter, required substantial assistance from staff with bathing, and moderate assistance from staff for transfers…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #223) reviewed for ADL's and who required assistance with toileting, the facility failed to ensure care that promoted the resident's dignity. The findings include: Resident #223 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pneumonia, pulmonary hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A physician's order dated 2/5/25 directed to administer Lasix (diuretic) 20 mg daily every other day. The nursing skilled evaluation dated 2/5/25 at 10:55 PM identified Resident #223 was alert and oriented and was continent of bladder with yellow urine. The social worker admission collection dated 2/6/25 at 2:56 PM identified Resident #223 was cognitively intact. The social worker note dated 2/6/25 at 3:20 PM identified she had called the resident representative with therapy present who indicated that Resident #223 was continent of bowel and bladder at home prior…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for of 3 of 4 residents (Resident #13, 3 and 173) reviewed for advance directives, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was obtained that reflected the resident/resident representatives wishes for code status (code status refers to the level of medical interventions a person wishes to have started if their heart or breathing stops). The findings include: 1. Resident #13 had diagnoses that included atherosclerotic heart disease. An Advance Directive dated 1/23/25 identified in the event of a cardiopulmonary arrest, Resident #13 requested Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). The Advance Directive was signed by the resident representative. A review of the physician orders dated 1/23/25 to 2/9/25 failed to reflect a DNR order was written. An interview with the DNS on 2/11/25 at 11:13 AM identified she would expect the nurse to obtain a physician's order once the advance directive was signed that reflected the resident/representative wishes. A review of the facility policy for Advance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #223) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to notify the physician when medications and creams were not available/provided according to the physician's order. The findings include: Resident #223 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pneumonia, pulmonary hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A physician's order dated 2/5/25 directed to administer Mucinex 1200 mg twice a day, Coenzyme Q10 200 mg tablet once a day, Triamcinolone Acetonide external cream 0.1% apply to abdominal folds and under left breast daily, and Anusol external cream 2.5% apply to hemorrhoids twice a day. Review of the nursing notes dated 2/5/25 to 2/10/25 failed to reflect the physician was notified that the Mucinex, Coenzyme Q10, Triamcinolone Acetonide external cream and Anusol had not been administered/applied per the physician's order.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #223) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to administer medications and creams according to the physician's order. The findings include: Resident #223 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pneumonia, pulmonary hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A physician's order dated 2/5/25 directed to administer Mucinex 1200 mg twice a day, Coenzyme Q10 200 mg tablet once a day, Triamcinolone Acetonide external cream 0.1% apply to abdominal folds and under left breast daily, and Anusol external cream 2.5% apply to hemorrhoids twice a day. Review of the nursing notes dated 2/5/25 to 2/10/25 failed to reflect the physician was notified that the Mucinex, Coenzyme Q10, Triamcinolone Acetonide external cream and Anusol had not been administered/applied per the physician's order. The social worker admission collection dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for of 3 of 3 residents (Resident # 7, 3 and 16) reviewed for pressure ulcers, for Resident #7 the facility failed to conduct comprehensive skin assessments by a registered nurse following the identification of a pressure injury consistent with professional standards, for Resident #3, the facility failed to complete a required nutritional assessment related to the presence of a newly identified pressure injury and for Resident #16 the facility failed to ensure the air mattress was set by the residents' weight per the physician order. The findings include: 1. Resident #7 had diagnoses that included fracture of the left femur and difficulty walking. The Hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] identified wound care for the left femur surgical site with no documented pressure injuries. The Baseline Care Plan dated 12/16/24 identified Resident #7 was at risk for skin breakdown. Interventions included the application of pressure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #17) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to implement interventions and supervision to prevent falls. The findings include: Resident #17 had diagnoses that included dementia and history of fracture. A Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #17 was at risk for falls. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #17 was severely cognitively impaired, required two person assist with bed mobility/transfers and had a history of falls since admission without injury. The Care Plan dated 9/18/24 identified Resident #17 had impaired cognition and was at risk for falls related to dementia. Interventions included anticipating resident needs, ensuring the call bell is within reach and if restless, relocating the resident to a common area for closer supervision instead of assisting them to bed. Physician orders dated 9/19/24 directed assist of one with ADL's. Assist of two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility documentation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate record of residents identified with Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) in accordance with infection control standards. The findings include: A review of the facility infection control program identified no documented surveillance of long term residents with current or a history of MDRO's. An interview and facility documentation review with the ADNS on 2/10/25 at 9:44 AM identified she was the assigned infection preventionist (IP) for the facility for the preceding five months and was responsible for implementing and monitoring infection control activities in the facility. The ADNS identified that although she tracked the MDRO status for short term residents, she had not completed surveillance or tracking on any long-term residents. The ADNS had not observed any long-term resident on enhanced barrier precautions indicating an MDRO when she was first employed at the facility and had not verified their status. The ADNS was unable to provide any documented MDRO tracking…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-03-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT