No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ingraham Manor Rehab And Nursing

400 N Main St, Bristol, CT 06010 · Non profit - Corporation · 128 certified beds · (860) 584-3400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (860) 584-3400 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
2 actual-harm citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$34,369 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (17) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $34,369 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-20)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
395 N Main St · (860) 585-5000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
81 North St · (860) 584-8998 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Goukreyol<0.1 mi
CHC Bristol, 395 N Main St · (929) 544-6167 · Call to confirm hours
Park
40 Queen St · (860) 584-6160 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.4%18.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.7%6.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.8%1.5%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms24.2%22.3%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.9%3.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.1%16.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.8%17.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.2%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.3%4.0%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.5%24.7%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table25.6%17.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.0%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine56.2%69.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.8%24.3%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.2%10.7%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.332.061.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.641.461.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 120 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
47.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 47.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.5%CMS range 46.4–63.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 6.8–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge47.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge36.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge41.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified88.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 4.3–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.53
RN hours/ resident / day
0.97
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.38
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.88
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.41
RN hoursweekends
38.1%
Total nursing turnover
22.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 110.8 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.05 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2023-10-27)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2021-08-23)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-02-20 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and facility documentation/policies, for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), the facility failed to initiate CPR and activate Emergency Medical Services (EMS) for a resident identified as a Full Code after the resident was found pulseless and without respirations. The facility's failure to initiate life-saving measures resulted in Immediate Jeopardy. The findings included:Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was a Full Code (medical order directing staff to initiate all resuscitative measures, including CPR and advanced life support, if a resident has no pulse or respirations).Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Type II diabetes, acute kidney injury, and atherosclerotic heart disease.The Nursing admission assessment by RN #2 dated [DATE] at 10:37 PM (created date [DATE] at 10:09 AM) identified Resident #1 arrived to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure assistance was provided safely and in accordance with physician orders to prevent a fall with injury. The findings include:Resident #1 had a diagnosis of difficulty in walking, and osteoarthritis. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition, and required [NAME] assistance for transfers. Physician order dated 10/6/2025 directed to transfer Resident #1 with the assistance of one (1) staff with a rolling walker. The facility reportable event form dated 10/11/2025 at 12:05 AM identified Resident #1 was found on the floor, transferred to the hospital and identified with a fractured humorous (upper arm bone). Nursing note dated 10/11/2025 at 1:09 AM identified at 12:05AM while staff were assisting Resident #1 with a transfer,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #1) reviewed for wandering, the facility failed to ensure a resident with known wandering behaviors was not able to leave the unit without staff knowledge, resulting in a fall with injury in the stairwell. The findings include: Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #1) reviewed for wandering, the facility failed to ensure a resident with known wandering behaviors was not able to leave the unit without staff knowledge, resulting in a fall with injury in the stairwell. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included vascular dementia, and anxiety disorder. Wander risk assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a score of eleven (11), which indicated he/she was a high risk (score 0 to 8 = low risk, 9 to 10 = at risk, 11 and above = high risk). Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews and facility documentation/policies, for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for advance directives, the facility failed to ensure advance directives/code status were readily accessible to staff during an emergency. Resident #1 was documented as a Full Code; however, when Resident #1 was found unresponsive and without a pulse, licensed staff were unable to determine the resident's code status and did not initiate the facility's emergency response. The findings included:Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was a Full Code (medical order directing staff to initiate all resuscitative measures, including CPR and advanced life support, if a resident has no pulse or respirations).Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Type II diabetes, acute kidney injury, and atherosclerotic heart disease.The Nursing admission assessment by RN #2 dated [DATE] at 10:37 PM (created date [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation/policies, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff provided necessary emergency services when three (3) licensed nurses (LPN #1, LPN #2, and RN #1) did not initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or activate emergency medical services (EMS) for a resident who was documented as a Full Code and the Registered Nurse pronounced the resident deceased without a physician order authorizing Registered Nurse Pronouncement (RNP). The findings included:Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was a Full Code (medical order directing staff to initiate all resuscitative measures, including CPR and advanced life support, if a resident has no pulse or respirations).Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Type II diabetes, acute kidney injury, and atherosclerotic heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #1) reviewed for wandering, the facility failed to ensure a wander assessment was completed accurately, and failed to ensure a resident with known wandering behaviors had a wander guard order in place for use, had the wander guard applied in accordance with the plan of care, and failed to ensure orders were initiated to check placement and function of a wander guard. The findings include: Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #1) reviewed for wandering, the facility failed to ensure a wander assessment was completed accurately, and failed to ensure a resident with known wandering behaviors had a wander guard order in place for use, had the wander guard applied in accordance with the plan of care, and failed to ensure orders were initiated to check placement and function of a wander guard. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policy, and interviews for one of two shower rooms, the facility failed to ensure the shower/bathroom was free of odors and failed to ensure that dirty linen carts were not stored in the shower/bathroom where clean linen is stored. The findings include: Observation on 10/23/2023 at 11:45 AM of the 3rd floor bath/shower room (Windsor Unit) identified the room had a strong smell of urine and soiled laundry. The room also contained four wheelchairs, four laundry bins filled with soiled laundry/linens, a mechanical lift, an office chair, and two shower chairs. There was also a closet that contained clean briefs, a separate toilet room that was unflushed and appeared to contain feces, the floor around the toilet also appeared to be soiled. Observation on 10/24/23 at 9:00 AM of the 3rd floor bath/shower room (Windsor) identified three laundry bins containing soiled linen, and a garbage can less than a quarter full. The toilet was clean but there was an odor of urine and soiled linen. Interview on 10/24/23 at 9:40 AM with NA#3 indicated that dirty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews for four sampled residents (Resident #12, #21, #27 and #28) who had physician's orders for controlled medications, the facility failed to ensure resident specific controlled medications were not borrowed and administered to other residents. The findings include: Observation during the medication storage review on the third floor with LPN #6 on 10/26/23 at 2:00 PM of medication cart #2 identified the Controlled Substance and Disposition Records for Residents #12 and #21 contained entries indicating that their medications were borrowed for other residents. Interview at the time of the observation with LPN #6 identified that she was directed to borrow from another resident when Residents #11 and #107 did not have any medication available. Resident #12's diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, anxiety,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews, facility policy review and interviews for eight sampled residents (Residents #1, #10, #11, #13, #46, #52, #58, and #86) reviewed for oxygen administration and respiratory treatments, the facility failed to label and date oxygen tubing and failed to store nebulizer mask, oxygen and nebulizer tubing appropriately to prevent contamination and failed to follow the physician's orders for the correct oxygen setting The findings include: 1. Resident #1 's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, and cerebral infarction. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was cognitively intact, and required extensive assistance for bed mobility, toileting and was totally dependent for transfers. A physician's order dated 2/15/23 directed to change oxygen tubing weekly, every Saturday night, using a label with date and initials. Treatment administration record dated 10/21/23, identified the oxygen tubing and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 sampled nourishment room refrigerators the facility failed to accurately check temperature and identify that the temperature that was tracked was too high per safe food storage parameters. The findings include: Observation on 10/25/23 at 10:25AM of the 2nd floor Nourishment Refrigerator identified no temperature was tracked for 10/25/23. The temperature of the refrigerator was set at 42 degrees and no thermometer was located. Interview on 10/25/23 at 10:30 AM with Dietary Assistant #1 identified that housekeeping is responsible for taking the temperature and that there should be a thermometer present, however none was located. Observation on 10/26/23 at 9:00AM of the temperature log identified no temperature was written in for 10/25/23 for the second floor Nourishment Refrigerator. The temperature was still set to 42 degrees. Interview with Housekeeper #1 on 10/26/23 at 9:45 AM identified that the temperature was recorded by opening the nourishment refrigerator on the 2nd floor hitting the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three Residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision for a resident identified at risk for wandering. The findings include: Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was seen for evaluation of chest pain after Resident #1 eloped from his/her home during the middle of the night and was discharged from the hospital to a skilled nursing facility. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia, visual hallucinations, and delusional disorders. Clinical record review identified Resident #1 had a court appointed Conservator of Person and Estate. A physician order dated 7/1/2023 directed transfers and ambulation inside room independent without assistive device and ambulate in hallway with supervision without assistive device. Additional order dated 7/1/2023 directed use of wanderguard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility documentation, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a clean and sanitary manner. The findings include: A tour of the kitchen with the Food Service Director (FSD) on 8/16/21 at 10:27 A.M. and the following was identified: 1. The kitchen exhaust hood, located over the food preparation area was coated with thick and grimy dust material 2. The juice cooler shelves sides and bottom were noted with thick caked on dried brown substance. 3. The exhaust fan in the window was noted to be on and noted with coated thick layer of dust that adhered to the wiring vent and wires. Interview with FSD on 8/16/21 at 10:27 A.M. identified the kitchen exhaust hood was last cleaned on 3/17/21 and is scheduled to clean every six months but will be cleaned more frequently as needed going forward. The hood cleaning company was called and scheduled cleaning on 8/19/21. Further, interview with FSD identified the cook is responsible for cleaning the refrigerators during their shift and any spills should be cleaned immediately. The FSD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident, (Resident #42) reviewed for positioning, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered plan of care for positioning. The findings include: Resident #42 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included [NAME] Pick Disease, apraxia and cerebellar ataxia. An Occupational therapy note dated 8/25/20 identified the resident was referred for OT for custom wheelchair delivery, assessment of seating and positioning, adjustments, modifications and staff training. Skilled therapy services are medically necessary in order to address deficits, improve quality of life, and assist patient in returning to prior level of function. The new custom wheelchair included : headrest, Roho cushion, pelvic positioning belt with harness type front support, left side hemi tray, added right side hemi tray and non elevating bilateral leg rests. The care plan for ADL…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for one of two residents (Resident #101) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to ensure an order was obtained for oxygen and that the resident's oxygen tubing was dated. The findings include: Resident #101 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] identified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on 2 liters of oxygen at baseline. The nursing admission note dated 7/28/21 indicted oxygen saturation of 91% on 2 liters via nasal cannula. Subsequent nursing notes indicated continued use of the oxygen. The care plans dated 7/29/21 identified a self-care deficit related to limited mobility and congestive heart failure. Intervention includes to provide the assistance of one staff with rolling walker while on O2 at 2 liters. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for one of two residents observed during a blood sugar collection via a glucometer for (Resident #15), the facility failed to implement infection control practices related to use of gloves. The findings include: Resident #15's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, heart failure and dementia. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #15 had severely impaired cognition and diabetes mellitus, required extensive assistance with mobility, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene and total dependence for bathing. The care plan dated 6/8/21 identified Resident #15 has diabetes mellitus. Interventions directed staff to monitor the resident, to document and report any signs and symptoms of infection to any open areas such as redness, pain, heat, swelling and/or pus formation. The physician's order dated 8/5/21 directed staff to obtain finger stick blood sugar before meals and at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record and policy and/or procedures and interviews for one sampled resident reviewed for self-administration of a medication (Resident #1), the facility failed to ensure a medication was administered in accordance with professional standards.The findings include: Resident #1 diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary (COPD), disease, nicotine dependence and anxiety. An admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident as cognitively intact requiring supervision for most and/or extensive assistance from staff for some activities of daily living. The RCP updated on 4/17/19 noted behaviors secondary to medication adjustments, pain and anxiety for the focus. Interventions included : to administer medications as ordered, monitor and/or document for side effects and effectiveness. A physician's orders for April 2019 directed Ipratroplum-Albuterol Solution 0.5-2.5 (3mg /3ml) inhale orally four times a day for COPD. The nursing-medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record and interviews for one sampled resident who required a nebulizer treatment (Resident #1), the facility failed to ensure the medication was administered in accordance to physician's orders .The findings include: Resident #1 diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary (COPD), disease, nicotine dependence and anxiety. An admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident as cognitively intact requiring supervision for most and/or extensive assistance from staff for some activities of daily living. The RCP updated on 4/17/19 noted behaviors secondary to medication adjustments, pain and anxiety for the focus. Interventions included: to administer medications as ordered, monitor and/or document for side effects and effectiveness. A physician's orders for April 2019 directed Ipratroplum-Albuterol Solution 0.5-2.5 (3mg /3ml) inhale orally four times a day for COPD. The nursing-medication self-administration assessment dated [DATE] identified in part,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$34,369 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $14,901 — penalty dated 2026-02-20
  • $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-09-08
  • $11,190 — penalty dated 2025-09-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SHAKOW, RACHELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL99%since 10/21/2025
ALTOWS, KAMALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/21/2025
ELABA, WILFREDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/21/2025
TKACZ, CHRISTINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/21/2025
IM MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/21/2025
LTC CONSULTING SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/21/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 7%Other / private 26%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$347per resident / day
operating cost
$10,559per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$312per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Connecticut
$15,208/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,118/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075329. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-10-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next