Geer Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 103 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 79.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 74.3 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 46 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.32 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from verbal abuse. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included vascular dementia, Parkinson's disease, depression, psychotic disorder, and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight out of fifteen (08/15), indicative of moderately impaired cognition and was independent for mobility with a wheelchair. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/02/2024 identified Resident #1 had Parkinson's and dementia, and had the potential for physical aggressive behaviors. Interventions directed to administer medications per physician orders, psychiatric follow up as needed, if agitated, intervene before escalates and guide away from the source of distress. A facility reportable event form…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an allegation of mistreatment timely. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included vascular dementia, Parkinson's disease, depression, psychotic disorder, and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight out of fifteen (08/15), indicative of moderately impaired cognition and was independent for mobility with a wheelchair. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/02/2024 identified Resident #1 had Parkinson's and dementia and had the potential for physical aggressive behaviors. Interventions directed to administer medications per physician orders, psychiatric follow up as needed, if agitated, intervene before escalates and guide away from the source of distress. A facility reportable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for quality of care, the facility failed to ensure orders were accurately entered into the electronic medical record, resulting in staples not being removed timely in accordance with physician orders. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included a displaced fracture of right femur, dementia, Alzheimer's Disease, venous insufficiency, and a pilonidal sinus abscess with open wound. The hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] directed to remove staples from Resident #2's incision in 14 days. Physician orders dated 7/2/2019 directed to nursing to remove Resident #2's staples on 7/13/2019. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of fifteen out of fifteen (15/15), indicative of cognitively intact and limited assistance with ADL's (activities of daily living). The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff education was completed and competencies up to date for the provision of Intravenous Therapy (IV) services. The findings include: An interview and review of staff education for the initiation of intravenous therapy and competencies for intravenous services with the Director of Nursing Services on 8/27/24 at 9:44 AM failed to identify licensed staff were certified in the implementation of IV therapy and when staff competencies were last evaluated. The DNS further identified s/he was responsible for ensuring the completion of the education and competencies which were to be completed on an annual basis. A review of the Facility Assessment Tool identified the facility assessment is to be updated at least annually or as needed and includes staff training, education and competencies.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to keep refrigerators at the appropriate temperatures for maintaining medications and for 2 of 2 medication rooms, the facility failed to dispose of expired medications. The Findings included: 1. Observation of the Harmany Lane medication room with LPN #3 on 8/24/24 around 10:00 AM identified the Medication Room refrigerator Temperature Log was found to be below 36 degrees on 9 days out of 27 days logged, the dates included 8/1/24, 8/2/24, 8/3/24, 8/19/24, 8/20/24, 8/21/24, 8/22/24, 8/23/24, and 8/24/24. The refrigerator contained the following: A package of Humalog containing 100 per milliliters 3 Flex pens of insulin 1 package of Lantus insulin 3 packages of Lorazepam (Anti-Anxiety) containing 30cc each LPN #2 identified that none of the medications were being used and the medications were for emergency only and that 3-11 PM shift was responsible for logging the refrigerator temperatures. Observation of the Cardinal Court medication room with LPN #2 on 8/24/24 at 10:30 AM identified the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Residents #4, #14 and #71) reviewed for immunizations, the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal vaccines were administered after obtaining consent. The findings included: A clinical record review of the pneumococcal immunization record identified the following: 1.For Resident #4, a Pneumococcal Vaccine Informed Consent/Declination Form dated 5/29/24 identified consent was obtained from Resident #4 to receive the Pneumovax vaccine with no documented history of administration following consent. An interview with the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) on 8/27/24 at 9:44 AM identified availability for the vaccine was inconsistent. An alternate vaccination could have been offered to Resident #4 but was not. Additionally, there was a community pharmacy that offered pneumococcal vaccinations that could have been utilized but were not. Resident #4 was scheduled to receive the Pneumovax vaccine after surveyor inquiry. 2. For Resident #14, a Pneumococcal Vaccine Informed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility policy review and interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #21) reviewed for dementia care, the facility failed develop a care plan that identified a resident with dementia and individualized care needs and for (Resident #4) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure daily weights were implemented according to the plan of care for a resident at risk for fluid overload and for 2 of 2 residents, (Resident #47 and # 278)) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance to the plan of care and for for 1 of 5 residents, (Resident #7) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to report a significant change in blood pressure per plan of care and for 1 of 1 resident ( Resident # 60 reviewed for Hospice/ End of Life Services, the facility failed to ensure staff transcribed special diet instructions for a resident with dysphagia upon admission to the facility per plan of care The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility policy review and interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for care planning for( Resident # 71), the facility failed to conduct a Resident Care Conference (RCC) within the appropriate timeframe and invite the resident's responsible party/ family and for 1 of 1 resident ( Resident # 60), reviewed for End of Life Services, the facility failed to revise the care plan to address the resident's wishes to received non prescribe foods for comfort. The findings included: 1. Resident #71 's diagnoses included unspecified dementia, cognitive communication deficit and aphasia. A review of the admission record identified Resident #71 was admitted on [DATE] The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #71 was cognitively impaired and required one person assistance in bed mobility and transfers and requires set up for food. The RCP dated 7/18/24 identified the need for long-term care. Interventions included collaborating with residents, family…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations and staff interviews for 1 of 5 Residents (#60) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the resident's discharge summary physician's orders for aspiration precautions were transcribed to meet professional standards of practice. The findings include. Resident #60's diagnoses included pneumonitis, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), a progressive neurogenerative disorder and palliative care. The hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] at 11:34 AM directed to provide an easy to chew diet cut into bite sized pieces with discharge special instruction to provide Strict Aspiration Precautions with upright posture while eating. A physician's order dated 7/17/2024 directed to provide a puree texture diet with nectar thick liquids. A physician's order dated 7/18/2024 directed to provide a regular chopped texture diet with nectar thick liquids due to Resident #60 and family preferring a more palatable texture. Resident #60 elected Hospice services on 7/19/2024. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy and staff interview for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #32) reviewed for Pressure Ulcer, the facility failed to ensure weekly skin assessments were completed per plan of care for a resident who developed a pressure ulcer. The findings include. Resident #32's diagnoses included Stage 2 pressure ulcer and Alzheimer's disease. A physician's order dated 5/9/2024 directed to complete a weekly skin check for skin assessment. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #32 as severely cognitively impaired and at risk for pressure ulcer and noted no pressure ulcers. The clinical record on 8/16/24 identified the wound physician identified a Stage 2 pressure ulcer on 8/16/2024 on the resident's right buttocks. The RCP for potential for development of a pressure ulcer care plan revised on 8/21/2024 indicated Resident #32 had a stage 2 pressure ulcer on the right buttock. Interventions included to follow up with the wound Advanced…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$24,690 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
• $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
• $14,814 — penalty dated 2024-01-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $634K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT