Cherry Brook Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 98 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 87 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 96.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-01-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and facility documentation/policies for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to follow physician orders which directed the assistance of two (2) staff for bed mobility which resulted in a dislocation of the left shoulder, and for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #4) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed provide adequate supervision by failing to initiate appropriate fall prevention interventions (toileting plan/schedule) and failing to implement an established care plan intervention (gripper socks) for a resident with progressive incontinence patters who was at high risk for falls. The findings included:1.Resident #1's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis after cerebral infarct affecting the left, non-dominant side. A Nurse's note dated 12/11/25 at 10:13 PM identified Resident #1 was alert and oriented times four. A Physician's admission Assessment note dated 12/12/25 at 11:30 AM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and facility documentation/policies for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #4) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to initiate appropriate fall prevention interventions (toileting plan/schedule) and failed to implement an established care plan intervention (gripper socks) for a resident with progressive incontinence patterns who was at high risk for falls. The findings included:Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in February of 2025 and had diagnoses that included dementia, cerebral infarction, and difficulty in walking.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #4 had severely impaired cognition (Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3), was dependent with toileting hygiene and bathing, required substantial assistance with ambulation, was occasionally incontinent of urine, and utilized a wheelchair. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/12/25 identified Resident #4 was at risk for falls…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and review of facility documentation and policies for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #4) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to perform a Bowel and Bladder Assessment upon readmission to the facility, in accordance with facility policy. The findings included:Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in February of 2025 and had diagnoses that included dementia, cerebral infarction, and difficulty in walking.The Bladder and Bowel assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #4 was continent of bowel and the bladder section indicated non applicable. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #4 had severely impaired cognition (Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 3), required substantial assistance with toileting hygiene, personal hygiene, and ambulation, utilized a wheelchair, and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 9/24/25 failed to identify Resident #4's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and facility documentation/policies for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #5) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a hospice resident suffering from terminal agitation who sustained several falls within a 24-hour period resulting in injury. The findings included:Resident #5 was admitted to the facility in December of 2025 with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), malignant neoplasm of the lung, anxiety disorder, depression and was admitted to hospice care on 12/19/25.The Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #5 was oriented to person, drowsy, and confused and required maximal assistance with toileting, personal hygiene, and rolling from side to side. The Nursing admission Assessment failed to identify Resident #5 was assessed for ambulation.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/20/25 identified Resident #5 was at risk for falls secondary to being newly admitted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents reviewed for medication administration (Residents #2 and #3), the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders when Resident #2 received Lacosamide prescribed for Resident #3 instead of the ordered Tramadol. The findings include:Resident #2's diagnoses included Parkinson's Disease, dementia, and anxiety. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had severe cognitive impairment (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5) and was dependent on staff for all care. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 9/11/25 identified Resident #2 had a diagnosis of alcohol and polysubstance abuse. Interventions directed to monitor the resident's psychosocial status, provide support, and arrange psychiatric services as needed. A physician's order for Resident #2 dated 11/13/25 directed to administer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an allegation of mistreatment timely. The findings include:Based on record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an allegation of mistreatment timely. The findings include: Resident #1 had a diagnosis of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) aphasia (inability to communicate. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 indicating severely impaired cognition, no swallowing difficulties, and required setting up for feeding. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/24/2025 identified a potential for impaired nutrition due to dysphagia. Interventions directed to allow resident time to consume meals, use…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurate to include support visits made after an allegation of mistreatment. The findings include:Based on record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurate to include support visits made after an allegation of mistreatment. The findings include: Resident #1 had a diagnosis of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) aphasia (inability to communicate. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 indicating severely impaired cognition, no swallowing difficulties, and required setting up for feeding. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/24/2025 identified a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, review of facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to store discontinued controlled drugs in a separately locked permanently affixed compartment, and failed to have a system to limit access to controlled drugs. The findings include: Observation on 12/19/24 at 12:20 PM identified the DNS office door was open without any staff present within the office. Interview with the DNS on 12/20/24 at 9:30 AM identified the discontinued controlled drugs were kept in a cabinet drawer in her office until destroyed. Observation on 12/20/24 at 2:15 PM identified the DNS office door was open without any staff present in the office. Interview on 12/20/24 at 2:20 PM with the DNS identified the keys to both locks of the discontinued controlled drugs cabinet drawer were located in her unlocked desk drawer and that she normally kept the keys stored in that drawer. Observation on 12/20/24 at 2:20 PM with the DNS identified the desk drawer containing the keys to the discontinued controlled drugs cabinet drawer was unlocked. Observation on 12/20/24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure open food items were dated and labeled. The findings include: Tour of the Dietary Department on 12/17/24 at 10:05 AM with the Kitchen Manager identified the following: a. The walk-in refrigerator was noted to contain an opened 1-pound bag of cheddar cheese (that was ½ full), an opened 1-gallon container of mayonnaise (that was ¼ full), and an opened bag of 7 croissants with no open date or expiration date identified. b. The walk-in freezer was noted to contain an opened 3-pound bag of French fries (that was ¼ full), an opened bag of 2 fish filets, and an opened 3-pound bag of potato tots (that was ¼ full) with no open date or expiration date identified. c. The dry storage room was noted to contain an opened 3-pound bag of elbow noodles (that was ½ full), an opened 3-pound bag of tri-color macaroni noodles (that was ½ full), an opened 5-pound bag of taco seasoning (that was ¾ full), and an opened 1-pound bag of pearled barley (that was ½ full) with no open date or expiration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-23 · tag F0868 — pattern
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility documentation review, facility policy review and interviews, the facility failed to perform quarterly Quality Assurance meetings and failed to ensure Quality Assurance meetings consisted of the minimum required members to maintain an effective and comprehensive Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. The findings include: 1. Review of the attendance record for the Quality Assurance Review meeting provided by the administrator failed to show that a Quality Assurance meeting was completed for September 2024. Interview with the administrator on 12/18/24 at 1:03 PM identified there was no QAPI meeting held since 6/2024. The administrator was unable to provide QAPI meeting minutes (official records of discussions, decisions, and actions taken during QAPI meetings) for the 6/2024 QAPI meeting and produced, only, a sign in sheet. The administrator identified she began working in the facility in 9/2024 as an interim administrator up until 3 weeks prior to the current date when she accepted the role permanently. She identified the previous…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) observed on facility tour, 10 of 32 residents (Resident #5, Resident #12, Resident #20, Resident #32, Resident #36, Resident #51, Resident #53, Resident #67, Resident #70, and Resident #244) reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and 1 of 2 residents (Resident #242) reviewed for Transmission Based Precautions (TBP), the facility facility failed to properly store a urinary containment bag and failed to initiate and maintain EBP per the Center of Disease Control (CDC) guidelines for residents with a history of Multiple Drug Resistant Organisms (MDROs) and failed to utilize personal protective equipment (PPE) while assisting a resident requiring EBP and failed to maintain TBP while assisting a resident with a positive COVID-19 diagnosis and failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment. The findings include: 1. Resident #1's diagnoses included paraplegia,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$11,175 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $11,175 — penalty dated 2026-01-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $675K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT