Elim Park Baptist Home, INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

71.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 297 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 81.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 112 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.85 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 78.7 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.37 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.48 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to ensure a gait belt was utilized when ambulating the resident in accordance with facility policy. The finding includes: Resident #1's diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, left artificial knee joint, and osteoarthritis. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had short- and long-term memory problems, required maximum assistance with toileting, bathing, and dressing, required moderate assistance with transfers and ambulation, and utilized a walker for mobility. The Resident Care Plan dated 10/28/23 identified a self-care deficit, limited physical mobility, and fall risk related to cognitive deficits and decreased functional mobility. Interventions directed for physical therapy and occupational therapy to assess and treat, use appropriate footwear, gripper socks when out of bed, to keep personal belongings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the tour of the Dietary Department, interviews and facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure open items were dated, failed to identify expiration dates, failed to ensure food was served under sanitary conditions, and failed to ensure correct dishwasher temperatures. The findings included: During a tour of the Dietary Department on 9/9/24 at 9:15AM with the Dietary Manager and Sous Chef the following was identified: 1a. The walk-in refrigerator was noted to contain an opened 5 pound bag of cheddar cheese (2/3 full), wrapped with plastic cling, with no date when opened, an opened 5 pound bag of cheddar cheese (1/2 full), wrapped in plastic, with no open date, an opened 5 pound bag of cheddar cheese (1/3 full), wrapped in plastic with no open date, an opened 5 pound bag of blue cheese (3/4 full), wrapped in plastic, with no open date and an opened 5 pound bag of blue cheese (1/3 full), wrapped in plastic with no open date, an opened 5 pound bag of parmesan cheese (1/4 full), wrapped in plastic, with no open date and an opened 5 pound portion of pepper jack cheese…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on obsevations, staff interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to appropriately supervise a resident during a meal per the meal ticket and failed to obtain weights per the physician's order, for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #53) reviewed for a skin condition the failed to apply TEDS (compression stockings) according to the physician's order, and for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #72) reviewed for edema, the facility failed to obtain a daily weight daily for a resident with Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) per the facility policy. The findings include: 1. Resident #18's diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #18 was severely cognitively impaired, independent with eating, required partial to moderate assistance with bed mobility, and was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a tour of the Dietary Department, interviews and facility documentation, the facility failed to provide lunch at appropriate and appetizing temperatures. The findings included: Interview with Resident #27 on 9/9/24 at 1:38 PM identified that vegetables were always cold. Interview with Resident #58 on 9/9/24 at 11:24 AM identified that the food was not hot and some of the food was overcooked, especially the vegetables that are mushy. Interview with Resident #72 on 9/9/24 at 11:55 AM identified that food was often cold. Interview with the Dietary Manager on 9/12/24 at 11:40 AM identified the process to ensure foods were served hot included the cook taking temperatures before taking the food out of the oven, checking the holding temperatures in the hot box, and taking the temperatures of the food when it was being plated. Interview and review of the temperature log with [NAME] #2 on 9/12/24 at 11:45 AM identified cooking temperature were recorded for service dates 9/1/24 to 9/11/24, but the log failed to identify temperatures in the hot box and plated temperatures. In…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews in 1 of 3 dining rooms residents, (Resident #35, Resident #65, and Resident # 430), reviewed for dining services, the facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience. The findings include: 1. 1. Resident #65's Diagnosis included Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety and depression. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #65 as severely cognitively impaired and required no assistance with eating. Observation on 9/12/24 at 12:15 PM identified Resident # 65 sleeping with his/her lunch meal in front of him/her. NA #4 began assisting Resident #65 with his/her meal and was noted to be standing over, and not at eye level, with the resident. Interview with NA #4 on 9/12/23 at 12:15 PM identified she had been standing over Resident #65 while assisting him/her to eat because her back hurt but subsequent to surveyor inquiry, sat down next to Resident #65 to continue to assist him/her. Interview with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of the clinical record, and facility policy for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #72) reviewed for edema, the facility failed to notify the physician of a weight gain greater than 3 pounds in 1 day, per the physician's order, for a resident with Congestive Heart Failure (CHF). The findings include: Resident #72's diagnoses included unspecified diastolic congestive heart failure, stage 3, chronic kidney disease, and essential hypertension. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #72 was cognitively intact, independent with eating, and was dependent with toileting, personal hygiene, and transfers. The Resident Care Plan dated 8/14/24 identified Resident #72 had CHF. Interventions included weight monitoring as ordered and to monitor/document/ report signs and symptoms of congestive heart failure such as dependent edema of legs and feet, distended neck veins, and weight gain. A physician's order dated 8/14/24 directed to weigh Resident #72 once daily for CHF…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility policy for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #63) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication was limited to 14 days per the requirement. The findings include: Resident #63's diagnoses included dementia, hypertension, and a fractured left femur. The admission Resident Care Plan dated 7/8/24 identified Resident #63 was taking a psychotropic medication, Trazodone, (an antidepressant). Interventions included to monitor Resident #63 as related to behavior, cognition, and mood. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #63 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of 2 for bed mobility, limited assistance of 2 for transfers, set up/supervision for eating, and that an antidepressant was in use. The physician orders dated 7/8/24 through 8/1/24 directed Trazodone 50 milligrams (mg), administer 0.5 mg every 8 hours as needed for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, review of facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff donned hair nets, beard guards and gloves during food prep and failed to ensure food items were properly dated, labeled and discarded at prescribed times and failed to ensure that the sanitizing liquid used to sanitize the food prep equipment and pots were at the appropriate level to disinfect and prevent the possibility of contamination from a microorganism. The findings include: Observation on 6/5/22 at 6:20 AM noted DA #1 (dietary aide) in the process of preparing strawberry and blue berry desserts, DA #1 was noted to use ungloved hands to place blueberries on the top of each dessert cup and was noted to not be wearing a hair net. Interview with DA #1 on 6/5/22 at 6:31 AM indicated he was supposed to wear gloves and a hair net when handling the resident's food. DA #1 immediately donned a hair net and gloves without the benefit of washing hands or using hand sanitizer. Observation in the kitchen on 6/5/22 at 7:15 AM noted [NAME] #1 in the process of preparing French…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff wore proper fitting facial masks that covered the nose and mouth. The findings include: Observation on 6/5/22 at 6:20 AM noted DA #1 had a face mask on that was on the chin but did not cover his nose or mouth. DA #1 was in the process of preparing desserts during the time of the observation. Interview with DA #1 on at 6/5/22 at 6:31 AM indicated he was aware that his mask should cover his mouth and nose, he immediately pulled his mask up over his nose and mouth. Observation on 6/5/22 at 7:15 AM noted [NAME] #1's mask was below his nose and only covered his mouth. Interview with [NAME] #1 on 6/5/22 at 7:16 AM noted he corrected his mask ensuring that it covered his nose. [NAME] #1 indicated all dietary staff must wear a mask at all times when preparing food and in the kitchen. Interview with the Dietary Manager on 6/6/22 at 10:45 AM indicated that masks worn correctly should cover the nose and mouth area. Review of the education provided by the Dietary Manager identified that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for administering oxygen therapy. The findings include: Resident #12 diagnoses included panlobular emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), shortness of breath, chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #12 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with personal hygiene with one person physical assist. The MDS further identified Resident #12 required extensive assistance of one person physical assist for transfer, dressing, and required oxygen therapy. A Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/13/22 identified Resident #12 has oxygen therapy related to COPD. Interventions included to administer oxygen according to physician's order. A review of the physician's orders dated 5/1/22 failed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-10-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, interviews, and policy review for one of three resident's reviewed for abuse ( Resident #25), the facility failed to ensure that the resident was free from abuse. The findings include: Resident #25 had a diagnosis of diabetes, and peripheral vascular disease. A Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] identified that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance with activities of daily living, and did not exhibit any alterations in mood. Review of a reportable event and investigation dated 10/8/19 identified that on 10/8/19 Resident #25's family member had called the facility at 5:30 PM and stated that a Nurse Aide (NA) had pinched the resident in his/her right breast in the hallway earlier in the day. The statement obtained from Resident #25 further identified that he/she was pinched in the right breast by a NA, and that this was not the first time it had happened, but he/she had not told anyone about the first incident. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,018 — penalty dated 2023-11-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $609K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT