Twin Maples Healthcare, INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 44 beds and averages 42.9 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and facility policy for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #2), reviewed for falls, the facility failed to transfer the resident per the physician's order, rehabilitation screen, and nurse aide assignment card, which resulted in a fall with multiple fractures. The findings include:Resident #2's diagnoses included Erb's paralysis due to birth injury, hemiplegia affecting the right dominant side and paralytic gait.A review of the Interdisciplinary Therapy Screen conducted by Occupational Therapist (OT) #1 dated 6/23/25 identified Resident #2 was assessed for transfers and was an assist of 2 staff members for Stand, Pivot, Transfer (SPT). The Resident Care Plan dated 6/24/25 identified Resident #2 was at risk for falls related to decreased independent mobility. Interventions included Occupational Therapy to evaluate and treat as ordered or as needed and transfer with assistance of 1 staff to wheelchair. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy and interviews, for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for grievances, the facility failed to ensure a complaint made by a resident regarding a staff member was referred to the designated grievance official, investigated, and documented with findings and resolution. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), dementia with behavioral disturbances, conduct disorder, anxiety disorder and psychosis.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severely impaired cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7), required substantial assistance with bed mobility and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene, toileting and transfers.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/29/26 identified Resident #1 had impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes due to a TBI/head injury, impaired decision making and made allegations and inappropriate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who had a history of wandering throughout the facility and self-ambulated with a walker, the facility failed to implement the Missing Person Policy when Resident #1 was not accounted for. The findings include:Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who had a history of wandering throughout the facility and self-ambulated with a walker, the facility failed to implement the Missing Person Policy when Resident #1 was not accounted for. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included vascular dementia, hemiplegia, and insomnia. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had short and long-term memory recall deficits and was independent with ambulation with the use of a walker. The Resident Care Plan dated 7/23/25 identified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #2) who had difficulty swallowing, the facility failed to follow the physician's recommended therapeutic diet which resulted in the resident choking. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included cerebral vascular accident and dysphasia (difficulty swallowing). The Speech Therapy Treatment Encounter note dated 2/25/25 identified Resident #2's diet was downgraded to a Level 5 minced and moist diet after Resident #2 was observed coughing on a Level 6 diet. The barium swallow results dated 3/10/25 identified diet recommendations for the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI) Level 5, minced and moist, regular dry bread and mixed consistency not allowed, alternate solids and liquids, and supervised feeding. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had some slight memory recall deficits, required staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to complete annual nurse aide performance evaluations. The findings include: Interview and review of facility documentation identified the facility employs a total of 25 nurse aides for all three shifts (7:00 AM - 3:00 PM shift, 3:00 PM - 11:00 PM shift, and 11:00 PM - 7:00 AM shift). Review of the personnel files of NA #1, NA #7, and NA #8 failed to reflect that annual performance evaluations had been completed. Interview with the DNS on 5/21/25 at 12:12 PM identified she has been employed by the facility for 7 years. The DNS indicated she has not completed nurse aide performance evaluations since she has been in the position. The DNS indicated annual nurse aide performance evaluations had not been completed in 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, and 1/1/25 - 5/21/25. Interview with the Administrator on 5/21/25 at 12:20 PM identified he was not aware that the DNS had not completed nurse aide performance evaluations in 7 years. Review of the facility employee handbook identified performance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #5 and 36) reviewed for accidents, for Resident #5 the facility failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for a resident with a history of repeated falls and for Resident #36 the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan related to the resident's behavior of flailing arms. The findings include: 1. Resident #5 had diagnoses that included schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #5 had moderate cognitive impairment and required one person assist with ambulation and toileting. The care plan dated 3/12/25 identified Resident #5 was at risk for falls related to a history of unsteady gait and noncompliance with asking for assistance. Interventions included ambulation with assist of one with a walker and do not leave the resident unattended when out of bed during the day. Physician's order dated 3/25/25 directed assist of one with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to revise the care plan following a fall for a resident with a history of repeated falls. The findings include: Resident #5 had diagnoses that included schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and overactive bladder. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #5 had moderate cognitive impairment and required one person assist with ambulation and toileting. The care plan dated 3/12/25 identified Resident #5 was at risk for falls related to a history of unsteady gait and noncompliance with asking for assistance. Interventions included ambulation with assist of one with a walker and do not leave the resident unattended when out of bed during the day. Physician's order dated 3/25/25 directed assist of one with two wheeled rolling walker for transfers and ambulation. A facility reported event dated 4/7/25 identified at 11:15 AM Resident #5 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #41) reviewed for quality of care, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained current CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) certification. The findings include: Resident #41 had diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, and hypertension. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #41 had moderate cognitive impairment required two person assist with bed mobility, transfers and toileting. The care plan dated [DATE] identified Resident #41 had advance directives specifying full code status meaning all life saving measures were to be implemented in the event of a medical emergency. Physician's order dated [DATE] directed full code status. A late entry nurse's note dated [DATE] at 9:00 PM identified between 8:00 PM and 8:30 PM, Resident #41 vomited a large amount twice and had a large bowel movement. A nurse's note dated [DATE] at 9:53 PM identified RN #4 was notified by the medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility documentation, the facility assessment, and interview, the facility failed to ensure intravenous (IV) therapy certifications and competencies were completed for 6 of 11 licensed nursing staff. The findings include: Review of the IV Therapy Certifications and Infusion Medications Administration Competencies binder failed to identify the following: RN #7 (hired on 5/2/15) was certified in IV therapy or had completed an Infusion Medications Administration Competency. RN #4 (hired on 4/24/18) was certified in IV therapy or had completed an Infusion Medications Administration Competency. RN #5 (hired on 11/29/21) was certified in IV therapy or had completed an Infusion Medications Administration Competency. RN #2 (hired on 5/27/22) was certified in IV therapy or had completed a 2024 annual Infusion Medications Administration Competency; competency was last completed on 8/8/23. RN #6 (hired on 7/6/22) was certified in IV therapy or had completed a 2024 annual Infusion Medications Administration Competency; competency was last completed on 8/12/23. LPN #4 (hired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to discard Insulin 28 days after it was opened according to professional standards. The findings include: Observation on [DATE] at 10:43 AM of a medication cart with LPN #1 identified the following. A vial of Novolog Insulin 100 units/ml 10 ml approximately ¾ full with an open date of [DATE], and a sticker that the Insulin was good for 28 days once opened. A vial of Lantus Insulin approximately ¼ full with an open date of [DATE], and a sticker indicating to discard 28 days after opening. Two vials of Aspart Insulin 100 units/ml 10 ml approximately 1/3 full with an open date of [DATE], and a sticker that indicated discard 28 days after opening. A vial of Lantus Insulin 100 units/per ml approximately ¼ full with an open date of [DATE] and a sticker that indicated discard 28 days after opening. Interview with LPN #1 on [DATE] at 10:48 AM indicated that she was the full-time charge nurse and administered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #15 and 78) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed in a timely manner. The findings include: 1. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility in December 2024 with diagnoses that included dementia with mood disturbances, hyperlipidemia, and spiral fracture of arm. The care plan dated 12/17/24 identified Resident #15 had impaired cognition due to dementia. Interventions included cues, supervise, and reorient resident as needed. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #15 had moderately impaired cognition and exhibited no hallucinations or delusions. Resident #15 did not show any physical or verbal behaviors directed towards others and had not rejected care. Resident #15 was receiving antipsychotic, antidepressant, and diuretic medications. A physician's order dated 1/31/25 directed to administer Seroquel…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$24,928 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $24,928 — penalty dated 2025-10-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $128K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT