Parkway Pavilion Health And Rehabilitation Center
1157 Enfield Street, Enfield, CT 06082 · For profit - Partnership · 130 certified beds · (860) 745-1641 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Feb 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 29.3% | 18.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.0% | 6.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.2% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 18.7% | 22.3% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.3% | 3.5% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.6% | 16.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.3% | 17.6% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 86.8% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.8% | 4.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.3% | 24.7% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 23.3% | 17.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.1% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 42.6% | 69.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.5% | 24.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.1% | 10.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.47 | 2.06 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.04 | 1.46 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 162 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 68.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.5%CMS range 44.7–57.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 7.9–15.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 68.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 57.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 10.3%CMS range 6.7–15.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.08 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 121.4 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was at high risk for falls and sustained multiple falls with major injuries (fractures) had adequate supervision and adequate fall interventions to maintain safety. The findings include: Resident #1 had diagnoses that included falls, right femur fracture, generalized muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, type 2 diabetes mellitus, difficulty walking, generalized muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, and unspecified lack of coordination. A Fall Risk Evaluation dated 4/22/2025 by LPN #5 identified Resident #1 was a moderate fall risk. The physician's orders dated 4/23/2025 directed to provide the assistance of one at wheelchair level with ADLs and toileting. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was moderately impaired (Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for three of three residents (Residents #1, #5 and #6) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the physician orders were signed and dated timely to indicate the physician/APRN reviewed and renewed the physician orders. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia, dysphagia and anxiety. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six out of fifteen, indicative of severe cognitive impairment and was dependent for ADLs. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/15/2026 identified Resident #1 had an ADL self-care deficit. Interventions directed to assist as needed. Record review identified Resident #1 was on an every 60-day schedule for review and renewal of physician orders. Record review identified although interim physician orders were signed, the monthly physician orders were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, interviews, and review of facility documentation and policies for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to provide supervision to ensure a resident was not able to leave the facility without staff knowledge, and failed to ensure a wander assessment was completed timely. The findings included:Resident #1 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of eleven (11) indicative of moderate cognitive impairment, ambulated independently and had no wandering behaviors. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/15/2025 identified an impaired thought processes related to diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease. Interventions directed to cue, reorient, and supervise as needed. Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) note dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who expressed worsening depressive symptoms related to being in the facility did not leave the facility unescorted. The findings include: Resident #1 had diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, cerebral infarction, repeated falls, hemiplegia, and muscle weakness. The quarterly [NAME] Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight (8) indicative of moderately impaired cognition, with the presence of feeling down, depressed, or hopeless for several days, socially isolated sometimes, required touching assistance with transfers, and was independent with locomotion with the use of a wheelchair. Social Worker (SW) #2's note dated 2/12/2015 at 11:20 A.M. identified Resident #1 expressed h/her emotions surrounding being at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure a resident who had a history of wandering into others residents rooms was free from physical abuse. The findings include: 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included epilepsy, major depressive disorder, and dementia. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of three (3) indicative of severely impaired cognition, required one staff assistance for activities of daily living (ADL's) and had physical behaviors symptoms directed towards others that occurred one (1) to three (3) days out of seven (7) days. The care plan dated 12/4/24 identified Resident #1 had a behavior problem related to poor safety awareness, dementia, yells out using inappropriate language and verbal aggression/swearing at peers with interventions that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for two (2) of three (3) residents (Resident #1 and #2) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to revise the residents' care plans after a resident-to-resident altercation and update the care plan after wandering behaviors were identified. The findings include: 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included epilepsy, major depressive disorder, and dementia. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of three (3) indicative of severely impaired cognition, required one staff assistance for activities of daily living (ADL's) and had verbal behaviors symptoms directed towards others that occurred one (1) to three (3) days out of seven (7) days. A psychiatry note dated 6/3/24 identified Resident #1 was seen for agitated behaviors. Resident #1 did not require a 1:1 at that time. The care plan dated 6/5/24 identified Resident #1 had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-12 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from misappropriation of resident property. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included diabetes. The RN admission assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of fifteen out of fifteen, indicative of no cognitive impairment. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 9/6/2024 identified Resident #1 had an ADL self-care deficit with interventions that directed to assist with ADLs. Record review identified Resident #1 was discharged to the hospital on 9/27 for a planned admission and readmitted [DATE]. Review of nursing note dated 10/3/2024 at 1:15 PM, written by RN #10/RN supervisor, identified about 12 PM a family member reported they had notified the police that someone at the facility had used Resident #1's charge card on 10/1 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for two of three residents (Resident #2 and #3) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was updated timely. The findings include: 1. Resident #2's diagnoses included dementia, mood disorder, and psychotic disorder. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 was severely cognitively impaired, had no behaviors in the prior seven (7) days, and ambulated independently with rolling walker. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 7/31/2024 identified Resident #2 had a risk of harm related communication deficit and cognitive limitations. Interventions directed psychiatric and social services as needed. 2. Resident #3's diagnoses included cognitive communication deficit, adjustment disorder, anxiety, and restlessness and agitation. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 was severely cognitively impaired, had no behaviors…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff completed in-servicing and competencies training yearly and failed to ensure annual performance evaluations were completed The findings included: 1,An interview and review of facility documentation on 9/5/2024 at 1:15 PM with RN#1 and the DNS identified the Fear of Retaliation in-servicing for 2023 each staff member received reviewed and signed the fear of retaliation facility policy. However, no training materials were utilized for the training. Documentation was provided for the year of 2024 using the Hand in Hand electronic media and signature sheets. Interview and review of facility documentation with Human Resource ( HR) Manager #1 on 9/11/2024 at 1:40 PM indicated 1 of 3 nurse aides (NA#9) and 2 of 3 LPN's (LPN #10 and #11) and 2 of 2 RN's randomly reviewed for completed performance evaluations and had no performance evaluations completed based on dates of hire from 8/1/2005 through 8/9/2018. HR Manager #1 further indicated s/he not know why the evaluation were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the tour of the Dietary Department/Nourishment Rooms, review of policy and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary department was maintained in a clean, sanitary manner. The findings included: Tour of the Dietary Department on 9/4/2024 at 10:07 AM during the initial walk through of the kitchen with the Dietary Manager (DM) identified the following: (see photos) a. The ceiling in the kitchen was identified to be discolored and had grayish, brown hanging substance noted around the lights and duct work. b. Tour of the Central Nourishment Rooms on 9/4/24 at 10:15 AM with the Dietary Director and Housekeeping Director identified: a resident's ice pack for personal use in the freezer Discolored red substance noted along the shelves Brown substance inside the shelves on the doors c. Tour of the East Wing Nourishment Rooms on 9/4/24 at 10:38 AM with the Dietary Director and Housekeeping Director identified: Brown substance noted to the shelves inside the refrigerator and along the shelves on the doors. A bag which contained 3 bowls with personal food items, not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-11 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, facility policy and interview, the failed to ensure the Automated Emergency Defibrillator (AED) equipment pads were not outdated. The findings include. On 9/05/24 at 1:39 PM Building and Fire Safety Investigator indicated the AED on the center unit in the facility was serviced appropriately and safe, but the pads were outdated and were changed by the facility. On 9/10/24 at 8:40 AM an interview and observation with the DNS identified the AED on the center unit with pads dated 6/8/2025 as the outdated pads noted prior were replaced. During observation the DNS indicated the AED on the TCU unit was new 3 months ago with noted pad dates 6/24/2025. The DNS also indicated although any nurse can check the AED and pads for the expiration date there was no process was in place and no documentation for checking for expiration dates of the pads. The facility policy and procedure labeled Automatic External Defibrillator, Use and Care notes to keep a spare battery and adhesive pads in the case as instructed, record expiration date of the battery and the pads on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-11 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
8Based on review of the facility annual training for Nurse Aides, facility documentation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the required 12 hours Nurse Aide training was completed. The findings include: An interview with the DNS on 9/11/2024 at 12:30 PM indicated there had been Nurse Aide training but the Staff Development Nurse who was responsible for the training is no longer employed by the facility. The DNS also indicated s/he could not provide evidence of the facility's annual 12 hours of in-service hours for 2024 because/he could not locate the training.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical records, facility documents, review of facility policy and staff interviews for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for Medication Regimen Review and Unnecessary Medications ( Residents #6, #22 #65, and #103), the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed by the physician timely. The findings included. 1. Resident #6 's diagnoses included unspecified psychosis, unspecified dementia, and depression. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 had severe cognitive impairment and required supervision or touching assistance for transferring from bed to chair. a. On 9/10/2024, a sample of pharmacy recommendations for Resident #6 was reviewed and identified the following: The pharmacy recommendation dated 9/30/23 indicated Resident #6 had two orders for Acetaminophen ( Tylenol), which may be considered duplicate therapy and recommended that one of the orders be discontinued. The pharmacy recommendation form did not contain a physician's response or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations of the Environment and staff interviews for 1 of 4 units for the East South wing, the facility failed to provide a homelike, clean and safe environment for Resident #89. The findings include: Observation of Resident #89's lower wall behind the bed during the initial facility tour on 9/04/24 at 10:47AM identified the window noted with a large area of chipped wall paint, detached floorboard panel with a brown- like substance on the lower half of the wall and the floor behind Resident #89's bed. Interview with Resident #89 on 9/04/24 at 10:47AM identified the lower wall behind the bed has been in this condition for some time and s/he reported it to staff members but could not recall exact names. Interview with the Director of Maintenance on 9/11/24 at 9:30AM identified s/he was not aware of the condition of the wall needing repair. The Director of Maintenance also indicated s/he does not participate in the monthly Environmental Rounds of the facility. The Director of Maintenance identified at the end of the interview that staff may have mentioned the wall in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observation, and staff interviews, for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #110), the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by a resident with a history of resident-to-resident altercations (Resident #6). The findings include: 1. Resident #6's diagnoses include unspecified psychosis, unspecified dementia, and depression. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 as severely cognitively impaired and required supervision or touching assistance for transferring from bed to chair and for walking ten feet. A Resident Care Plan dated 5/7/2024 identified Resident #6 had a history of witnessed physical altercations with other residents including a prior roommate. The care plan indicated the altercations occurred on 2/22/2024 and on 5/7/2024. Interventions included separating the involved residents, social service follow-up, and psychiatry follow-up. 2. Resident #110 was admitted on [DATE] with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documents, review of facility policy and interviews for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #89 and # 106) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to protect residents from abuse by not immediately removing an alleged staff member from the facility per facility policy. The findings included. 1. Resident #89's diagnoses included poly neuropathy, chronic pain, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #89 was cognitively intact. Resident #89's care plan dated 7/10/2024 indicated Resident #89 has chronic pain and requires pain medication. Interventions directed to observe adverse reactions with every interaction with the resident. The care plan dated 7/30/2024 indicated Resident #89 was noted to have accusatory behaviors towards staff, throwing items secondary to anger and prefers to stay in bed most of the time. Interventions directed to have 2 caregivers at all times and to provide psychiatric…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews for 1 of 4 sampled residents, (Resident #74) reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), and 1 sampled resident, (Resident #121) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment coding for 1 of 3 ( Resident #79) residents reviewed for Respiratory Care, the facility failed to ensure the resident's utilization of oxygen was coded correctly on the MDS assesssment. The findings included: 1. Resident #74's diagnoses included schizophrenia and unspecified intellectual disabilities. The Notice of PASRR Level II Outcome dated 11/11/21 identified Resident #74 with diagnoses of severe mental illness/intellectual disabilities and noted the resident was approved without the need of specialized services. The Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #74 as severely cognitively impaired and required one person assist with activities of daily living and was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical records, review of facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents ( Resident #72) reviewed for Respiratory Care, the facility failed to ensure the care plan reflected the needs of the resident and for 1 of 2 residents ( Resident # 120) reviewed for hospice, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address the resident's needs. The findings included: 1. Resident #72's diagnosis includes a muscle disorder with generalized muscle weakness, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen) and obstructive sleep apnea. The Registered Nurse ( RN) admission note dated 7/31/2024 at 5:03 PM indicated in part Resident #72 had a tracheostomy tube (Trach) capped as tolerated and utilized a non-mechanical ventilator (AVAPS) The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #72 as cognitively intact, tracheostomy (Trach) care and and noted use of a non-invasive mechanical ventilator. The care plan dated 8/12/2024 Resident #72 noted stage 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy and staff interviews for 1 resident reviewed for edema (Resident #61), the facility failed to update/ revise the resident's care plan. The findings include: Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #61's diagnoses included Congestive Heart failure (CHF), cellulitis of the right lower limb and lymphedema. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #61 as cognitively intact. Resident #61 was transferred to the hospital on 7/2/2024 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A physician's order dated 7/14/2024 directed to obtain a daily weight for CHF monitoring and to notify the physician if there was a gain of 2 pounds in 24 hours or 5 pounds gained in a week. The RCP dated 8/30/2024 indicated Resident #61 had a nutritional problem or the potential for a nutritional problem related to CHF and use of a diuretic (water pill). Interventions included: to restrict fluid intake and obtain laboratory work as ordered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility policy and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #50) reviewed for pain, the facility failed to follow up on the residents Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) appointment per physician's order timely and for 1 resident ( Resident # 61) reviewed for edema, the facility failed to conduct weights per physician's orders and for 1 resident ( Resident # 120) reviewed for End of Life/ Hospice, the facility failed to follow the plan of care. The findings included: 1. Resident #50's diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and unspecified hearing loss. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #50 as cognitively intact and noted the resident required supervised set up assist with bed mobility, two persons assist with transfers. The Resident Care Plan dated 7/9/24 identified Resident #50 had a potential for pain related to general discomfort and a hearing impairment. Interventions directed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview for 1 resident ( Resident # 19) reviewed for bowel management, the facility failed to consistently change the resident's bowel appliance. The findings include: Resident # 19's diagnoses included schizophrenia, Alzheimer's disease, dementia and dysphagia. The MDS 6/4/24 annual assessment identified the resident as moderately cognitively impaired and noted no functional limitation with upper extremities. Additionally, the assessment noted the utilization of a colostomy. The RCP 7/4/24 for require assistance with ADL. Intervention includes providing physical therapy 5 times a week and occupational therapy 4 times a week. The nurses note 9/4/24 at 5:05 PM identified that Resident # 19 notified the nurse that a nurse aide refused to assist her/him with his/her bowel appliance and the nurse aide also came in turned off the call bell light without seeing what s/he needed. A review of the Treatment Administration Records ( TAR) and Medication Administration Record ( MAR) for August 15, 2024 to 9/10/24 2024 failed to reflect when Resident #…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #65) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to re-weigh resident within 24 hours of a weight change per policy. The findings include: Resident #65 's diagnoses included dysphagia, chronic kidney disease, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #65 as moderately cognitively impaired and required maximum assistance with showering, dressing, and indicated the resident was dependent for toileting. A physician's order dated 7/16/24 directed to provide a Consistent Carbohydrate Diet with no added salt, mechanical ground soft texture regular thin liquid consistency. The Resident Care Plan with a revision date of 7/26/24 identified the resident has a nutritional problem or potential for a nutritional problem related to end stage renal disease, GI issues and dysphagia. Interventions included providing diet as ordered, obtain a dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews, review of policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents ( Resident #72) reviewed for Respiratory Care, the facility failed to ensure supplies were available for a resident with specific respiratory needs in the event of an emergency and for 2 of 3 sampled residents ( Residents # 79 and Resident # 112) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to ensure the resident's oxygen tubing was dated and labeled in accordance to facility practice. The findings include: 1. Resident #72's diagnosis includes a muscle disorder with generalized muscle weakness, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen) and obstructive sleep apnea. The Registered Nurse ( RN) admission note dated 7/31/2024 at 5:03 PM indicated in part Resident #72 had a tracheostomy tube (Trach) capped as tolerated and utilized a non-mechanical ventilator (AVAPS) The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #72 as cognitively intact, tracheostomy (Trach) care and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation and interviews for 1 resident (Resident# 422) reviewed for Unnecessary Medication, the facility failed to promote the resident psychosocial well-being by when the resident missing property could not be located timely. The findings include: Resident #422 's diagnoses included hypertension, dysphagia and cognitive communication defect. The care plan dated 7/25/24 identified Resident #422 had psychosocial wellbeing problem related admission. Interventions include to give positive reinforcement and attempt to resolve conflicts. A physician's order dated 7/25/24 indicated to monitor for sudden changes in behaviors. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #422 was cognitively intact and requires require supervision/ touching assistance for bed mobility. A review of facility documentation identified on 8/4/24 Resident # 422 reported to staff s/he could not find his/her wallet but thought s/he had left her/his wallet with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #173) reviewed for hospice, the facility failed to ensure the provision of routine and emergency pain medication for a resident receiving end of life services/ Hospice. The findings include: Resident #173's diagnoses included pancreatic cancer and diabetes mellitus, type II and receiving end of of life services. The findings include: The Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #173 was admitted from home, was alert and oriented, independent with self-care and did not report any pain. The facsimile Medication Order Report dated 6/4/23 received from the community hospice center identified Resident #173 had medications orders that included acetaminophen tablet 325 MG by mouth every 4 hours as needed for Pain/Elevated Temperature greater than 101 Do not exceed 3 GM in 24 hours, Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) solution 20 MG/ML. Give 0.25 ml by mouth every 3 hours as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medication, the facility failed to order as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications for only 14 days. The findings include: Resident #22 's diagnoses included vascular dementia, hyperlipidemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #22 as cognitively impaired and dependent on staff with eating, oral hygiene and bed mobility. The care plan dated 8/1/24 identified Resident #22 uses anti-anxiety medications related to restlessness. Interventions include to give anti-anxiety medications ordered by physician. Monitor and document side effects and effectiveness. A physician's order dated 8/21/24 directed to give 1 tablet (Lorazepam oral tablet 0.5MG) by mouth every 4 hours as needed for anxiety/restlessness for 30 Days. The Medication Administration Records indicated Resident #22 last received the Lorazepam on 9/7/24. Interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews for 1 of 2 medication rooms and 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage, the facility failed to ensure that medications were labeled appropriately and stored in a clean and sanitary environment. The findings include: 1. On 9/4/2024 at 11:05 AM observation of the East Medication Room and medication refrigerator with LPN #8. The following was observed the medication refrigerator appeared visibly soiled. There was brown, flaky residue on the back left side of the lower shelf where one box of Omeprazole oral suspension and three 150 ml bottles of Vancomycin oral solution were stored. There were two clear drawers under the bottom shelf that had brown and pink residue. Due to the sticky pink residue, the right side drawer was difficult to open as it was stuck to the lower portion of the refrigerator. The bottom shelf inside the refrigerator door also had pink, brown, and white residue. The inside of the door also had brown and pink residue on it. 2. The medication refrigerator also had a top freezer. The freezer was noted to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations of the dumpster and interviews, the facility failed to properly dispose of garbage and refuse. The findings include: Observation made with the Dietary Director, Maintenance Director, and Environmental Director on 9/4/24 at 10:18AM of the dumpsters identified numerous debris left alongside of the dumpsters and facility which included a discarded mattress with a brown substance noted on the cover, multiple used gloves, discarded cigarette buds, plastic cups, bags, and bottles. On 9/4/24 at 10:18AM an interview with the Dietary Director identified the area was not well kept or cleaned and s/he was unsure of who was responsible for maintaining the area around the dumpsters. On 9/4/24 at 10:20 AM an interview with the Maintenance Director identified the dumpsters are emptied 2 times a week. The Maintenance Director also identified that's s/he was unsure of who was responsible for maintaining the area around the dumpsters. On 9/04/24 at 2:23 PM an interview with RN #1 identified all the staff were responsible for picking up around the dumpsters. and there is no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and interview, the facility failed to ensure QAPI meetings were conducted at least quarterly, and a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) completed annually. The findings include: An interview with the Administrator, the DNS and RN #1 on 9/11/2024 at 2:33 PM identified they were unable to provide evidence of a QAPI meeting from October 2023 through February 15, 2024, and was unable to provide evidence that a PIP performed annually in 2022, 2023 or 2024. The Administrator indicated s/he was not at the facility at the time indicated therefore cannot answer why it was done. The Administrator since then the facility have conducted QAPI meetings almost every month and would be conducting a PIP in the near future. The facility policy Quality Assurance and Performance improvement (QAPI) Program indicated in part prioritizing identified quality issues based on risk of h arm and frequency of occurrence and determining which will become a focus of PIP's is an action step of the process.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, facility policy and staff interviews for 1 resident reviewed for 1 resident (Resident #72) reviewed for tracheostomy care, the staff failed to implement appropriate infection control techniques for enhanced barrier precautions for the resident. The findings include: Resident #72's diagnoses included Myotonic Muscular Dystrophy, acute respiratory failure, and muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #72 as cognitively intact and required maximum assistance for toileting, showering, and dressing. A physician's order dated 8/30/24 directed to provide tracheostomy care two times daily. The Resident Care Plan dated 9/9/2024 identified the resident was on enhanced barrier precautions related to tracheostomy care. Interventions included for the staff to wear gown and gloves while caring for the resident and to follow facility policies for enhanced barrier precautions. Observed tracheostomy care on 9/9/24 at 10:15 AM with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, review of facility policy and staff interviews for 1 of 3 residents (#72) reviewed for Respiratory Care, the facility failed to ensure licensed staff were trained to provide an emergency procedure for a resident requiring specialized care. The findings include: Resident #72's diagnosis includes a muscle disorder with generalized muscle weakness, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen) and obstructive sleep apnea. The Registered Nurse ( RN) admission note dated 7/31/2024 at 5:03 PM indicated in part Resident #72 had a tracheostomy tube (Trach) capped as tolerated and utilized a non-mechanical ventilator (AVAPS) The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #72 as cognitively intact, tracheostomy (Trach) care and and noted use of a non-invasive mechanical ventilator. The care plan dated 8/12/2024 Resident #72 noted stage 1 wound (non-blanchable redness) on the bridge of the nose. Intervention included: to assist/encourage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, interviews, and facility documentation for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for elopement risk, (Resident #2), the facility failed to provide necessary monitoring and supervision for a resident that was identified as an elopement risk. The findings included: Resident #2 had diagnoses which included unspecified dementia and an anxiety disorder. A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 as severely cognitively impaired and required supervision with ambulation. A Resident Care Plan dated 4/15/24 identified Resident #2 was at risk for elopement with interventions that directed to have more frequent monitoring outdoors due to non-compliance with electronic bracelet due to self removal with every 15 minute checks in place. Review of Observation Worksheets identified Resident #2 was on 15 minute checks from 4/15/24 through 7/19/24. a) Review of a nurse's note dated 4/15/24 at 3:58 PM identified Resident #2 had exited the facility and proceeded to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on a tour of the facility, the facility failed to ensure the door locks were properly functioning. The findings included: Observations conducted on 7/30/24 at 4:30 PM identified the door on TCU North unit leading outdoors, although alarmed, failed to engage the delayed egress, allowing exit from the building immediately without the delay of egress. Interview with the Director of Maintenance on 7/30/24 at 4:46 PM identified door locks and alarms were checked monthly per Facility Compliance Services standards of practice., and he was unsure why the delayed egress feature was non-functional. Review of the facility's Monthly Coded Door Inspection Log Sheets identified the facility doors were checked monthly in accordance with facility policy and that all door locks and alarms were properly functioning, with the last coded door inspection check completed on 7/23/24. The facility stated that they were placing a staff member at the door continuously until the door was fixed. Although requested, the facility was unable to provide a policy regarding door lock/safety checks.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure supervision was provided for a resident with wandering behaviors in accordance with physician orders. The findings include: Resident # 1 was admitted with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, osteoporosis, and unsteadiness. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severely impaired cognitive skills, required limited assistance for bed mobility, and was independent for transfers and walking. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/28/2023 identified Resident #1 had impaired cognitive function/impaired thought processes, was an elopement risk and was at risk for safety due to intrusive and constant behavior and wandering. Interventions directed to cue, re-orient, supervise as needed, and to keep Resident #1 in line of sight when wandering. A physician's order dated 11/19/2023 directed to keep…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #2), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to implement a plan of care for a resident who was a high risk for falls, required assistance with ambulation and frequently ambulated unassisted resulting in a fall with major injuries. The findings include: Resident #2 was admitted [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses that included pneumonia, Alzheimer's, anxiety and repeated falls. The admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was alert, confused and oriented to self only, was continent of bowel and bladder, required setup or clean up assistance for toileting, and required supervision/ assistance for toilet transfers. The care plan dated 10/4/23 identified Resident #2 had an activities of daily living (ADL's) self care performance deficit with interventions that included assistance of one with transfers, ambulation, and toileting. A Fall risk assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #2), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to a resident who was assessed as a high fall risk and was impulsive with ambulation resulting in a fall with injury. The finding includes: Cross reference F-656 Resident #2 had diagnoses that included pneumonia, Alzheimer's, anxiety, and repeated falls. The admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was alert, confused and oriented to self only and required supervision/ assistance for toilet transfers. A Fall risk assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 was at high risk for falling. The care plan dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had an activities of daily living (ADL's) self-care performance deficit with interventions that included assistance of one with transfers, ambulation, and toileting. There was no specific care plan related to fall risk. A nursing note dated [DATE] at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for two of three residents (Resident #20 and #87) reviewed for advance directives, the facility failed to ensure advance directive choices were reviewed with the resident or the resident's representative timely to ensure their choices were honored. The findings include: 1. Resident #20's diagnoses included Dementia. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility during 7/2021. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #20 had moderate cognitive impairment, was not receiving hospice services and did not have a life expectancy of less than six (6) months. Review of the clinical record identified Resident #20 had a Power of Attorney (POA), with a copy of the POA located in the chart. Review of the physician's orders from admission (7/2021) to [DATE] directed that Resident # 20's status was a full code. The social services assessment completed on [DATE] identified Resident #20's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, facility documentation review, and interviews for two sampled residents (Resident #33 and #58), reviewed for care and services, the facility failed to ensure floor mats in use were maintained in good condition. The findings include: 1. Resident # 33's diagnoses included dementia and muscle weakness. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #33 had severe cognitive impairment and required maximum assistance of two staff for positioning. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/19/2021 identified Resident #33 was at risk for falls. Interventions directed use of a floor mat on the floor on door side of the bed when Resident #33 was in bed. Intermittent observations of Resident #33 in bed on 1/31 and 2/1/2022 identified a large rectangular red floor mat was located on the floor next to Resident #33's bed, near the door side of the bed. The mat was observed to have multiple cracked, torn and ripped areas throughout the entire surface…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #110) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from mistreatment and the facility failed to ensure staff provided the resident with a meal timely. The findings include: Resident #110's diagnoses included dementia and heart failure. The Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 110 was confused, required assistance with ADLs due to generalized weakness related to recent hospitalization and required staff supervision for meals. Observations on 1/31/2022 at 8:45 AM identified Resident #110 was in bed with the head of his/her bed rolled up. Resident #110 had his/her eyes closed and did not respond when greeted by surveyor - appeared to be sleeping. The meal tray contained a plate with the cover still over the food, the flatware was clean, and there were two (2) cups containing liquids with the cups covered with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #117) reviewed for urinary catheter, the facility failed to ensure continued use of an indwelling catheter was assessed timely. The findings include: Resident #117's diagnoses included obstructive and reflux uropathy. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #117 was cognitively intact and required extensive staff assistance for toileting. Resident #117 was further identified to have an indwelling catheter and a trial of a toileting program had not been attempted on admission. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/13/21 identified Resident #117 had an indwelling catheter and was at risk for infection and/or complications. Interventions directed to providing catheter care daily, observe for pain/discomfort due to catheter and signs/symptoms of UTI, change the drainage bag monthly and cover the bag for privacy/dignity. Interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility policy review, and interviews for facility medication storage, the facility failed to ensure the safe storage of prescribed medications in their original packaging. The findings include: 1. Observation of LPN #5's medication cart on 2/3/2022 at 2:00 PM identified in every drawer except the locked narcotic box drawer, a total of 74 unidentifiable tablets scattered around in open view mixed throughout the bottom of each drawer. Interview with LPN #5 on 2/3/2022 at 2:10 PM identified medication should be stored in their respective bottles/containers with proper labeling. Any medications that are found not inside their respective bottles/containers must be wasted with another nurse for proper medication disposal. LPN #5 identified staff should clean their medication carts at the end of each shift and ensure no loose medication are identified within the cart. 2. Observation of LPN #6's medication cart on 2/3/2022 at 2:15 PM identified in every drawer except the locked narcotic box drawer, a total of 12 unidentifiable tablets scattered around in open view…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility documentation, review facility policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and well-maintained manner, and the facility failed to ensure a fan used in the kitchen was cleaned timely, and the facility failed to ensure foods were stored in accordance with accepted practices, and the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was maintained in good repair, and the facility failed to ensure temperature logs were completed timely. The findings include: Tour of the facility kitchen with the Food Service Director (FSD) on 1/31/2022 at 7:00 AM identified approximately ten (10) missing floor (vinyl-like) tiles on the hallway leading into the kitchen with a large piece of cardboard over the floor where the tiles were missing. Additional observations of the hallway identified the right-side wall (back of the wall from the kitchen) had many areas of chipped and missing paint over the lower six (6) inches of the wall. Observations inside the kitchen identified a puddle of water was observed on the floor near…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #110) reviewed for a change in condition, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate to include an RN assessment was documented timely for a resident with an identified change in condition. The findings include: Resident #110's diagnoses included dementia and heart failure. The Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 110 was confused, required assistance with ADLs due to generalized weakness related to recent hospitalization and required staff supervision for meals. Observations on 1/31/2022 at 8:45 AM identified Resident #110 was in bed with the head of his/her bed rolled up. Interview with LPN #4 on 1/31/2022 at 9:45 AM identified Resident #110 had a change in condition and was unresponsive. LPN #4 indicated that she had notified the physician. Clinical record review on 2/1/2022 failed to identify an RN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for facility infection control review, the facility failed to ensure signage was posted timely to alert staff and visitors of a COVID-19 outbreak in the facility. The findings include: Observations on 1/31/2022 at 6:00 AM failed to identify signs were posted at the facility entrance to identify a COIVD-19 outbreak in the facility. Interview with the Administrator on 1/31/2022 at 9:30 AM identified there were currently nineteen (19) residents in the facility that were currently COVID-19 positive and on isolation precautions. Additional observations on 2/1 at 8:40 AM, and 2/2/2022 at 8:35 AM failed to identify signs were posted at the facility entrance to identify a COIVD-19 outbreak in the facility. Interview with the ADNS and RN #6 on 2/3/2022 at 10:16 AM identified although there should be signage posted at the main entrance/front door to alert visitors and staff of the COVID-19 outbreak in the facility, they were unable to demonstrate signs were posted. Observation of the main facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-08-08 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a clinical record review, a review of the facility documentation and staff interviews for one of three sampled residents reviewed for ambulation (Resident #20 and Resident #89), the facility failed to provide documentation and/or failed to ambulate the resident as per rehabilitation recommendations and/or as directed in the physicians orders. The findings include: a. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, heart disease, hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified intact cognition and required extensive assistance with transfers and walking in corridors. A care plan dated 5/13/19 identified Resident #20 has an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit, was unable to complete ADL tasks independently, and required individualized interventions to improve function secondary to weakness and impaired cognition. Interventions directed to provide assistance when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-08-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the clinical record, staff interviews, a review of facility documentation, and a review of facility policy, for three of five residents (Resident #11, #36, #109) reviewed for immunizations, the facility failed to ensure documentation and/or the refusal of immunizations. The findings include: a. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia without behavioral disturbance and chronic kidney disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #11 with severe cognitive impairment, the pneumococcal vaccination was not up to date and Resident#11 was offered the pneumococcal vaccine but declined its administration. Review of facility immunization report identified Resident #11 refused the first dose of Pneumovax, however the documentation failed to identify a date or time. In addition the refusal form could not be located, and/or documentation failed to identify that Prevnar 13 was requested for consent. Interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an observation, a review of the clinical record, a review of facility documentation, staff interviews and a review of facility policy, for one resident (Resident #34) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to provide freedom from abuse, neglect, or exploitation. The findings include: Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, brain injury, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, traumatic brain injury and muscle weakness. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident # 34 with severe cognitive impairment, incontinent of bowel and bladder, total dependence for transfers with a two person assist. The care plan dated 5/31/19 identified limited physical mobility related to weakness, was at risk for falls, and suffered from dementia with depressive features. Interventions included to allow the resident to perform tasks at his/her own rate, do not rush the resident and encourage independent activity. The care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation and interviews for one sampled residents (Resident #174) who was reviewed for activity of daily living, the facility failed to ensure that the resident received showers and/or failed to document that the showers were offered, given and /or refused by the resident who was dependent on staff for care. The findings include: Resident #174's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, heart failure, rhabdomyolysis, and acute respiratory failure. The admission nurse's note dated 9/7/18 identified Resident #174 was admitted at 8:45 PM via ambulance on a bariatric stretcher from the hospital. The nurse's note dated 9/8/18 at 4:15 AM identified Resident #174 was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation. The Resident Care Plan dated 9/8/18 identified Resident#174 had a self-care deficit secondary to generalized weakness and difficulty ambulating. Interventions indicated the resident required assistance of two (2) with bathing. The admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, a review of facility documentation for one of five sampled residents (Resident # 118) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to conduct preventative maintenance to ensure equipment was functional and/or safe. The findings include: Resident # 118's diagnoses included morbid obesity, pyogenic arthritis, orthopedic aftercare right knee, muscle weakness, and difficulty walking. Physician's orders dated 2/1/19 identified weight bearing as tolerated to the right lower extremity. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 2/1/19 identified Resident # 118 required assistance with activities of daily living. Interventions directed to assist with hygiene as needed The MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #118 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene and bathing. Review of the facility documentation dated 3/14/19 at 11:25 AM indicated Resident #118 had finished…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the clinical record, an observation, staff interviews and a review of the facility policy for one of four residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident # 3), the facility failed to ensure the resident received a nutritional supplement and/or failed to conduct a speech evaluation as directed in the physician orders. The findings include: Resident # 3's diagnoses included feeding difficulties, difficulty swallowing, cerebral infarction, and diabetes. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance of one person to eat. The Resident Care Plan dated 8/6/19 identified Resident # 3 is at risk for nutritional decline. Interventions included to provide four ounces of ensure pudding twice a day, to provide a sandwich with lunch and to provide speech therapy as needed. a. A review of the clinical record identified a weight of 135.4 pounds on 5/2/19 and a weight of 126 pounds on 6/1/19 (a 6.94% weight loss in one month)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and a review of the facility policy, the facility failed to accurately label medications and/or failed to ensure the medication refrigerator was free from employee food items. The findings include: a. Observation on 08/08/19 at 8:50 AM identified one medication cart contained two opened resident specific containers of Latanoprost eye drops absent the identification of the date the medication was opened. Interview with LPN #2 identified this medication was typically administered by the evening nurses, and they should have placed an open date on them. Interview with RN #3 on 8/7/19 at 9:34 AM identified medications that required an expiration date should be dated directly on the medication bottle when it was opened. The facility Medication administration policy identified the nurse shall place a date opened sticker on the medication if one was not provided by the dispensing pharmacy. b. Observation of the medication room [ROOM NUMBER]/7/19 9:00 AM identified one unlabeled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the clinical record, staff interviews, a review of the facility documentation, and a review of the facility policy, for one resident (Resident # 115), reviewed for intravenous therapy, the facility failed to consistently document the administration of a medication, and/or consistently document the assessment of a Peripheral Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line. The findings include: Resident # 115 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes mellitus with a foot ulcer. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified intact cognition, at risk for the development of a pressure ulcer, the identification of an infected foot ulcer, and was receiving antibiotics via a PICC line in the right antecubital space. A physician's order dated 8/1/19 directed to administer 2 Grams of Cefazolin intravenous (IV) every 8 hrs with a completion date of 8/29/19. Review of the medication administration record dated 8/1/19 through 8/7/19 identified 2 doses of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| WACHUSETT VENTURES LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/29/2016 |
| WAKEFIELD CAPITAL LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/07/2016 |
| DENNEHY, RAYMOND | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/29/2016 |
| KIRCHICK, JOEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 02/28/2017 |
| VERA, STEVEN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/29/2016 |
| AFFAINIE, URSULA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/06/2024 |
| ANTICO, JOAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/12/2024 |
| CABOT, MELISSA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/23/2024 |
| ELLIS, SHARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/07/2019 |
| GRAY, KIMBERLY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/23/2019 |
| LOPATOSKY, JOSEPH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/28/2017 |
| MEDEIROS, JEAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/04/2024 |
| ORTIZ, EDELMARIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/10/2022 |
| SHAH, DARSHAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| SMITH, KIMBERLY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/11/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $716K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CT
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075195. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.