Amberwoods Of Farmington

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 107 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 119 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 123.4 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility documentation and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #3), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to properly position the resident in bed during the provision of care resulting in the resident slipping out of bed and sustained bilateral femur fractures. The finding includes: Resident #3's diagnoses included Multiple Sclerosis (MS), morbid obesity, and muscle weakness. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/10/24 identified that Resident #3 was at risk for falls with interventions that included a Hoyer lift for transfers. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance for bed mobility and had impaired range of motion on both sides of the upper and lower extremities. A care plan update dated 8/18/24 identified that the resident was to have 4 siderails during positioning. A physician's order dated 8/1/24 directed the resident to have assistance of two (2)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure care was provided safely to prevent a fall with fracture. The finding included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included spinal stenosis, diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, and anxiety disorder. An admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderate cognitive impairment, required moderate assistance for bed mobility, height was 60 inches (5 feet) and weight was 241 pounds. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/9/2023 identified Resident #1 required assistance with ADLs and was a fall risk due to weakness, impaired safety awareness and impaired judgement. Interventions directed to assist as needed with ADLS, encourage the resident to call for help before getting up, assist with activities of daily living as needed, and provide a pressure relieving mattress. A facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews, for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was non-ambulatory and dependent on staff for care remained free from injury during a transfer.The findings include:Resident #1 had diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis, obsessive-compulsive disorder, personality disorder, anxiety, morbid obesity, edema, chronic kidney disease, low back pain, arthritis, displaced comminuted fracture of the right femur, and fracture of the left femur. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/20/2022 identified Resident #1 is to get out daily of bed at 10:45 AM into an electric wheelchair with interventions that directed use of a mechanical lift with the assistance of two staff. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for transfers. Review of the facility Reportable Event Form dated 6/20/2022 at 2:20…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure staff were trained in the use of a mechanical lift. The findings include:Resident #1 had diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis, obsessive-compulsive disorder, personality disorder, anxiety, morbid obesity, edema, chronic kidney disease, low back pain, arthritis, displaced comminuted fracture of the right femur, and fracture of the left femur. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/20/22 identified Resident #1 was to get out of bed at 10:45 AM daily into an electric wheelchair with interventions that directed use of a mechanical lift with the assistance of two staff.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for transfers. Review of the facility Reportable Event Form dated 6/20/22 at 2:20 PM identified during transfer Resident #1 had a fall in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was labeled appropriately and temperatures completed prior to serving. The findings include:A tour of the kitchen on 7/24/25 at 10:15 AM with the Food Service Director identified a bottle of thousand island dressing that was half filled with a date of 12/31/24 located in the reach in refrigerator. Interview on 7/24/25 at 10:20 AM with the Food Service Director identified opened condiments such as salad dressing should be used within 3 months of opening and then discarded. Observation of the walk-in freezer on 7/24/25 at 10:30 AM identified a frozen apple pie in saran seal with no open date or expiration date. Interview on 7/24/25 at 10:35 Am with the Food Service Director identified she could not locate the open date or expiration date but believed it was from a recent event. Review of the food temperature log on 7/24/25 at 10:40 AM identified no record of food temperature completed on the following days/meals: On 6/1/25, 6/2/25, 6/3/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-26 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, review of facility policies and procedures and interviews for the facility reviewed for Administration, the facility administration failed to ensure that all contracted staff who provide direct or indirect care to residents met the training requirements or were provided the mandatory training as outlined in the facility assessment and per regulatory requirements prior to, and while providing ongoing services in the facility. The findings included: Review of the facility assessment dated [DATE] identified under the training plan section indicated a training mechanism for mandatory training of new and existing employees, contracted individuals, and volunteers, in all of the following required areas:Effective communicationResident RightsAbuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Quality Assurance and Performance ImprovementInfection ControlCompliance and EthicsNurse aide competencyBehavioral healthNon-pharmacological interventionsDementia CareOn 8/25/25 at 10:10 AM a request was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for 22 residents (Residents #3, #4, #6, #16, #17, #24, #29, #33, #37, #42, #47, #49, #52, #84, #85, #90, #94, #127, #128, #140, #145 and #146) who received podiatric care from one Podiatrist, the facility failed to ensure a contracted Podiatrist maintained standard precautions, and failed to ensure the podiatry medical equipment was cleaned and disinfected after each resident and prior to use on another resident to prevent cross-contamination and spread of infection. The findings include:Observations on 7/24/25 at 11:40 AM identified the Podiatrist exited Resident #146's room, and was wearing latex gloves, he proceeded to push a cart down the corridor. The cart contained a pair of soiled latex gloves, a small pile of unused gloves, a clear plastic container that contained about a fourth of an inch of bluish colored liquid, the container had a paper towel that covered the bottom of the container, and the container held three metal clipping tools. Two of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #113) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure an assessment was completed upon identification of a pressure ulcer. The findings include:Resident #113 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included lack of coordination, type 2 diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease, and dementia. The care plan dated 7/9/25 identified Resident #113 was at risk for skin breakdown related to anticoagulant use with interventions that included: administer pressure relieving devices as ordered, apply house lotion as needed, apply treatments as ordered, dietary consult as needed, turn and reposition per facility policy, weekly skin checks by licensed nurse.The admission assessment dated [DATE] identified a new skin issue on the buttocks, denuded (the loss of the outermost layer of skin) skin wound measurements not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of six sampled residents (Resident #53) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to supervise a resident who exhibited wandering behaviors and was at risk for elopement. The findings include:Resident # 53's diagnoses included dementia, anxiety, depression, adjustment disorder, restlessness and agitation.The elopement evaluation dated 4/28/25 identified Resident # 53 was at risk for elopement.The care plan dated 5/27/25 identified Resident #53 was at risk for wandering and elopement with interventions that included: clearly identify the resident's room and bathroom, engage the resident in activity, and re-direct when noted self-propelling in the wheelchair outside the unit, supervision with wheelchair mobility. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #53 had moderate cognitive impairment, required supervision with wheelchair mobility and had not displayed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one of five sampled residents (Resident #25) reviewed for vaccinations, the facility failed to offer or provide the pneumococcal #20 vaccination. The findings include: Review of the Infection Preventionist's (LPN #1) vaccine line list identified Resident #25 received the pneumococcal #23 on 10/31/20. There were no other noted pneumococcal vaccines listed as administered.A physician's order dated 12/24/24 directed to administer the pneumococcal vaccine. Resident #25's Pneumonia Vaccine Education Documentation Form, indicated the resident elected and agreed to receive the pneumococcal vaccine PVC #20, dated 12/29/24. A physician's order dated 1/21/25, directed to administer the Prevnar #20 intramuscular suspension prefilled syringe 0.5ml, inject 0.5ml intramuscularly as needed for vaccine. Resident #25 was readmitted (original admit date was 12/24/24) to the facility in March of 2025 and had diagnoses that included a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — widespread
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for two (2) of three (3) residents, (Resident #1 and Resident #3), reviewed for care planning, the facility failed to ensure Resident Care Conferences in accordance with facility policy. The findings include: 1. Resident #1's diagnoses included down syndrome and personality disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired, exhibited behaviors and required maximal assistance with bed mobility and transfers. The Resident Care Plan dated 7/26/24 identified that Resident #1 required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) with interventions that included transferring and ambulating with a hand held assist of one and a gait belt, encouraging the resident to do as much for themselves as possible and initiating a therapy consult as needed. Review of the clinical record for Resident #1 failed to identify any documented Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, interviews, and policy review, for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for abuse ( Resident #2), the facility failed to ensure that allegations of neglect and abuse were reported to the state agency in accordance with facility policy. The findings included: Resident #2 had diagnoses that included dementia. A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified that the resident had severely impaired cognition, required extensive assistance with activities of daily living, and refused care on a daily basis. A care plan dated 2/28/24 identified that the resident refuses care with interventions that included to notify the family when the resident refuses care. a) Review of a concern/complaint form dated 1/30/24 identified that Resident #2's family member had concerns that on 1/30/24 the resident was found in the same clothes from the day before, pants and the incontinent brief were saturated with urine. The concern form further identified that NA…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$20,872 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $10,033 — penalty dated 2024-09-11
• $10,839 — penalty dated 2023-11-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $85K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT