Civita Care Center At Salmon Brook
72 Salmon Brook Drive, Glastonbury, CT 06033 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 130 certified beds · (860) 653-9888 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0606) — most recent Jun 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0570)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (81) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $24,164 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-04)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 23.4% | 18.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.6% | 6.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.1% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.1% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 77.2% | 22.3% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.5% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 24.7% | 16.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.9% | 17.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 86.0% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.9% | 4.0% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.2% | 24.7% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.4% | 17.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 31.8% | 69.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 14.5% | 24.3% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.5% | 10.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.36 | 2.06 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.20 | 1.46 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 106 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.1%CMS range 44.9–64.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.0%CMS range 8.8–16.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 35.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 88.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.7%CMS range 5.0–11.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.22 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 112.0 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.21 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.41 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.33 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.89 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
81 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 69 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure a resident identified as high risk for wandering received adequate supervision to ensure the resident was not able to leave the facility without staff knowledge, which resulted in the facility unable to locate the resident for 4 hours and 40 minutes. The failures resulted in a finding of Immediate Jeopardy. The findings include: Record review identified Resident #1 had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and delusional disorders, and Resident #1 had a Power of Attorney (POA) for care decisions and finances. Wander risk evaluation dated 1/10/2025 identified Resident #1 scored a 12 which indicated Resident #1 was a high wander risk. admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition, and ambulated independently. The Resident Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the resident was transferred in accordance with physician orders and the plan of care to prevent an injury. The finding included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia, Parkinson's disease, atrial fibrillation, and chronic kidney disease. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance with one (1) staff member for transfers. A Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/6/2023 identified Resident #1 was at high risk for falls due to gait and balance problems, history of falls and had fragile skin. The RCP directed to use a lifting device to move Resident #1. A physician's order dated 10/7/2023 directed a Hoyer lift for transfers and Resident #1 was non-ambulatory. A facility incident report dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews, for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure appropriate assessment, monitoring, and treatment of existing pressure ulcers. This included failure to complete Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk assessments in accordance with facility policy; failure to complete weekly skin assessments using the Skin Observation Tool; failure to obtain and document weekly pressure ulcer measurements and wound assessments; and failure to ensure an as needed dressing change order was in place to address dressing dislodgement or soiling. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included spinal stenosis of the lumbar region, spina bifida with hydrocephalus, muscle weakness, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder.The clinical record identified Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] with an unhealed stage 4 pressure ulcer.The Braden…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility documentation review and interviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient laundry services to ensure resident laundry was completed timely due to broken washing machines. The findings included: Review of a grievance dated 8/4/2025 identified Resident #2 was displeased with the amount of time it was taking his/her personal items to be laundered. The grievance identified Resident #2 had sent personal items to be laundered about one (1) week prior, and was still waiting for them to be washed and returned. The grievance further identified a response from the facility administration indicating the facility was were working on buying a new washing machine. Review of Vendor #1 invoice dated 8/14/2025 identified a sixty (60) pound washing machine was purchased and due to the facility on 8/29/2025. Review of Resident Council minutes dated 8/29/2025 and 9/25/2025 identified residents were displeased with the delay in having personal items laundered. Interview with the Environmental Services Director on 10/1/2025 at 9:29 AM identified two (2) of the three (3) washing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, interview, and review of clinical documentation and policy for one resident (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights, the facility failed to allow an alert and oriented resident access to an enclosed courtyard. The findings included:Resident #1 had diagnoses that included spina bifida with hydrocephalus, osteoarthritis, anxiety and major depressive disorder. Review of the RCP dated 7/7/2025 identified Resident #1 meets his/her emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs by socializing with peers, and going outside when it's nice out, and dining in the Rosewood dining room for lunch. Interventions directed Resident #1 to go outdoors, and on short trips when able. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of thirteen (13) indicative of intact cognition and was independent with wheelchair mobility.Review of a facility grievance dated 9/27/2025 identified Resident #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, interview, and review of clinical documentation and policy for one resident (Resident #1) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure the nurse who prepared a medication was the nurse who administered the medication, in accordance with facility policy. The findings included:Resident #1 had diagnoses that included anxiety and major depressive disorder. Review of the RCP dated 7/7/2025 identified chronic back pain and pain medication therapy. Interventions directed to administer analgesic medications as ordered by the physician. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of thirteen (13) indicative of intact cognition, and received pain medication. The MDS further identified Resident #1 as dependent with bathing, toileting, and personal hygiene. A physician's order directed Morphine Sulfate (Concentrate) Solution, 20 milligrams/milliliter, give 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation of the noon meal dining and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a meal that was appealing and palatable to residents. The findings include: Interviews conducted with residents during the survey identified that food was not appealing and palatable On 6/23/25 at 12:47 PM the facility lunch provided to residents identified pasta with water like tomato sauce and mixed vegetables. Observation on 6/23/25 at 12:47 PM of the tomato sauce identified the sauce was a water like consistency. The interview with the Food Service Director on 6/23/25 at 1:35 PM indicated he noticed the sauce was watery and believes it might have been due to the excess liquid from vegetables.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolatedNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of employee files and staff interviews for 1of 2 employees (Rehabilitation Aide # 2), the facility failed to provide evidence that a background check had been conducted for the employee. The findings include: An interview and facility document review with the Administrator on 6/23/2025 at 11:00 AM indicated no background check information were found in employee for (Recreation Aide # 2). The Administrator also indicated the current Human Resource Manager for the facility only worked onsite a couple days a week. An interview with the Human Resource Manager on 6/23/2025 at 1:06 PM identified she/he only started the position a few months ago and had noticed files had not contained background checks. She/he was told the prior Human Resource Manager only worked remotely therefore the forms were never printed and placed into the employee files. The Human Resource Manager indicated s/he would be coming to the facility later in the afternoon and would print the forms from the electronic reporting system and leave with the administrative staff. An interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of policy and staff interviews for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #20), the facility failed to ensure a suspected incident of intimidation was reported to the Administrator. The findings include: Resident #20's diagnoses included depression, anxiety, and panic disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #20 was cognitively intact and exhibited fluctuating inattention. The MDS assessment also identified Resident#20 did not exhibit behavioral symptoms directed towards others nor rejection of care. A care plan revised on 6/4/2025 identified Resident #20 had a mood problem related to psychiatric diagnoses. Interventions included: providing psychosocial and emotional support from social work to enhance overall well-being, providing psychiatric services, and supportive counseling from facility staff. The care plan also identified Resident #20 had a behavior problem related to suicidal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record reviews and staff interviews for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for discharge (Resident #97 and Resident #98), the facility failed to provide evidence of Ombudsman notification for transfers and discharge The findings included: 1.Resident #97's diagnosis included pneumonia and sepsis. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated in part, the discharge date for Resident #97 was 3 months or less. A nursing progress note dated 3/25/2025 at 1:56 PM indicated Resident #97 was discharged from the facility with medications and services on 3/25/2025 at 12:00 PM. On 6/24/2025 at 1:10 PM an interview with the social worker indicated the administrator was in charge of notifying the state's Ombudsman with resident's discharged from the facility. An interview with the Administrator on 6/24/2025 at 1:20 PM identified the facility has a remote staff who notifies the state Ombudsman of discharges, and she/he would obtain the information for Resident #97. On 6/25/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy and interview for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), the facility failed to refer a resident with known mental health diagnosis to the appropriate state- designated authority for a Level II evaluation and determination. The findings include: Resident #64's diagnoses included delusional disorder, hypertension and Type 2 diabetes mellitus. The care plan dated 3/11/25 identified Resident #64 receives antipsychotic medications. Intervention included observing resident mood state/behavior and report changes to physicians. A physician's order dated 4/4/25 directed to give 5 Milligrams (MG) of Risperdal one time a day related to delusional disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #64 was moderately cognitively impaired and dependent with eating, bed mobility and transfers. The MDS also indicates Resident #64 has frequent symptoms of feeling down,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record review, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for behaviors (Resident #20 and Resident #89), the facility failed to follow and or develop a resident care plan for addressing the residents' mood and behaviors for the only resident reviewed for Hospice ( Resident #74) the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for a resident receiving specialized services. The findings included: 1.Resident #20's diagnoses included depression, anxiety, and panic disorder. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #20 as cognitively intact and exhibited fluctuating inattention. The MDS assessment also identified Resident#20 did not exhibit behavioral symptoms directed towards others nor rejection of care. A care plan revised on 6/4/2025 identified Resident #20 had a mood problem related to psychiatric diagnoses. Interventions included: providing psychosocial and emotional support from social work to enhance overall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 69 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and staff interview for the only resident reviewed for Dementia Care (Resident #89), the facility failed to revise the resident's comprehensive individualized interdisciplinary dementia care plan timely. The findings include: Resident #89's diagnosis includes dementia with behavioral disturbance. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #89 had a diagnosis of non-Alzheimer's dementia and indicated care planning for cognitive loss/dementia would be addressed in the care plan. A care plan dated 8/15/2024 indicated Resident #89 had cognition/acute delirium/hallucinations. Interventions included 1:1 visit in a quiet environment to provide reality orientation offering opportunity to verbalize needs, feelings, to involve family and supportive care Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN). The annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #89 was noted with a diagnosis of dementia and cognitive loss/dementia to be addressed in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy and staff interviews only the resident (Resident #65), reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL), the facility failed to ensure ADL care was provided every two hours per facility practice. The findings include: Resident #65's diagnosis includes spinal cord injury. A care plan dated 4/28/2025 identified Resident #65 was dependent for ADL and required two people for care The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #65 was cognitively intact and was dependent for toileting and personal hygiene. An interview on 6/17/2025 at 12:00 PM with Resident #65 identified she/he had to wait 5 hours to get changed after a bowel movement on 6/13/2025. The resident indicated that the nurse aide from the evening shift informed him/her the nurse aide needed to wait for help from a staff member in the other wing secondary to she was the only one assigned to the wing. The resident indicated that she/he called his/her family member, who then called the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interview for the only sampled resident (Resident #20) reviewed for Communication/ Sensory, the facility failed to administer eye medications according to physician's orders.The findings include: Resident #20 's diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), tremor, unspecified and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #20 as cognitively intact, vision was reported as adequate, and noted resident uses corrective lenses. Independent in eating, toilet hygiene and bed mobility. The care plan dated 6/11/25 identified impaired visual function related to cataracts and glaucoma. Interventions included: to review medications for side effects which affect vision. Arrange consultation with eye care practitioner as required. Monitor/document/report when needed (PRN) any signs and symptoms of acute eye problems. A physician's order dated 6/8/25 directed to give 1 drop of Moxifloxacin HCl…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility staffing posting, resident interviews, review of the Facility Assessment and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to care for the needs of a dependent resident (Resident #65) in accordance to facility staffing ratios. The findings include: Resident #65's diagnosis includes spinal cord injury. A care plan dated 4/28/2025 identified Resident #65 was dependent for ADL and required two people for care The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #65 was cognitively intact and was dependent for toileting and personal hygiene. An interview on 6/17/2025 at 12:00 PM with Resident #65 identified she/he had to wait 5 hours to get changed after a bowel movement on 6/13/2025. The resident indicated that the nurse aide from the evening shift informed him/her the nurse aide needed to wait for help from a staff member in the other wing secondary to she was the only one assigned to the wing. The resident indicated that she/he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff closed and locked the nursing supervisor's office door with medications stored on counters in unsecured containers and unlocked cabinets when leaving the area. The facility failed to ensure Residents #20, # 21, 38, 71 and #80's eye drops located in one medication cart were dated once opened and failed to remove expired Intravenous Therapy equipment and medication. The facility failed to remove discharge resident medications timely. The findings included: 1.An observation on [DATE] at 09:45 AM identified the nursing supervisor's office door open with no staff inside and or within eyesight. Further observations identified a clear plastic case labeled with emergency medications inside and under the clear box was an orange emergency medication box with a handle without a lock allowing ease of removal from the office. After a few minutes at 9:48 AM with no staff returning to the office the Regional Nurse (RN #1) was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations of glucometer monitoring, review of facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that used lancets were disposed of in a manner to contain and prevent any potential contamination/spread of bloodborne pathogens. The findings include: An observation and interview on 6/17/2025 at 7:38 AM of the facility procedure for glucometer use while obtaining a fingerstick with a retractable one time use sharps lancet for a blood glucose reading on unit B. Further observation identified once the procedure was completed the lancet was placed into a plastic disposable drink cup with no lid and not secured, then placed on top of the treatment cart which did not have any sharps containers available. RN #2 indicated once all finger sticks were completed the cup was brought to the sharp's container located on the medication cart where the used lancets were then poured into the sharp's container. An observation and interview on 6/17/25 7:43 AM on the A-wing with LPN #3 indicated the plastic disposable drink cup with no lid and not secured located on top of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-05-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that laundry equipment within the facility was maintained timely and in proper working order. The findings include: Interview with Resident #15 on 5/28/25 at 12:19 PM identified staff complain there is not enough washcloths for care, it has taken weeks to get personal laundry back and staff have told him/her the facility has only one (1) working washing machine. Interview with Resident #2 on 5/28/25 at 12:24 PM identified his/her personal laundry was sent to laundry eight (8) days ago, he/she had not received it back, and he/she had to wear dirty clothing because he/she had no clean clothing left to wear. Resident #2 identified he/she reported the laundry delay to the Administrator a few days prior and inquired with the laundry staff who reported the facility had only one working washing machine. Interview with Resident #3 on 5/28/25 at 12:38 PM identified the facility does not have enough washcloths or towels for bathing, he/she has had to use sheets as towels, and staff told him/her they do not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited beforedisputed · IDR2025-05-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility documentation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that building equipment was maintained to provide a clean, comfortable, home-like environment for the residents. The findings include: Interview with Resident #15 on 5/28/25 at 12:19 PM identified staff complain there is not enough washcloths for care, it has taken weeks to get personal laundry back and staff have told him/her the facility has only one (1) working washing machine. Interview with Resident #2 on 5/28/25 at 12:24 PM identified his/her personal laundry was sent to laundry eight (8) days ago, he/she had not received it back, and he/she had to wear dirty clothing because he/she had no clean clothing left to wear. Resident #2 identified he/she reported the laundry delay to the Administrator a few days prior and inquired with the laundry staff who reported the facility had only one working washing machine. Interview with Resident #3 on 5/28/25 at 12:38 PM identified the facility does not have enough washcloths or towels for bathing, he/she has had to use sheets as towels, and staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-05-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to ensure a fall intervention was implemented according to the plan of care and according to physician order, after a resident who was identified as a high fall risk, sustained a fall out of bed. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included altered mental status, muscle weakness, atherosclerotic heart disease (the build-up of plaque in the arteries limiting blood flow to the heart) and congestive heart failure (the hearts inability to pump blood as efficiently as it should). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10), required substantial assistance for bed mobility and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene and transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/26/22 identified Resident #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-05-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for impaired skin integrity, the facility failed to ensure preventative interventions were initiated and implemented according to facility policy for a resident admitted to the facility with an active pressure injury and after the development of a facility acquired pressure injury. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included altered mental status, muscle weakness, atherosclerotic heart disease (the build-up of plaque in the arteries limiting blood flow to the heart) and congestive heart failure (the heart's inability to pump blood as efficiently as it should). A nurse's note dated 9/29/22 at 1:01 PM identified that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with a stage 2 pressure injury (partial thickness wound) to the coccyx measuring 2 centimeters (cm) by 1 cm. A Braden Scale assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #1 was at a high risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-05-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #4) reviewed for dependent care, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate Nurse Aide documentation. The findings include: Resident #4's diagnoses included dementia, altered mental status, anxiety disorder and malnutrition. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #4 had moderately impaired cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8), required setup assistance for eating and was dependent on staff for personal care, bed mobility and transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/29/25 identified Resident #4 required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Interventions included staff providing all Resident #4's care if he/she was unable to participate in ADLs. Observation on 5/28/25 at 12:34 PM identified Resident #4 was dressed and sitting in his/her wheelchair at the bedside. Resident #4 appeared clean, well…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for podiatry services, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was added to the podiatrist's priority schedule following a diagnosis of an infection of the left great toe. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included diabetes with polyneuropathy (nerve pain). The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15 indicating some memory recall deficits and was dependent on staff for personal care. The current Resident Care Plan identified Resident #1 had diabetes mellitus. Interventions directed to wash the feet daily with mild soap and water, dry thoroughly, may use a light dusting powder or lotion, and do not apply lotion or powder between the toes, and to monitor skin and report any issues. A physician's order dated 2/1/25 directed diabetic foot…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews for one of three (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure wander guard bracelet physician orders were obtained timely for residents identified as high wander risk and failed to ensure physician orders directed wander guard bracelet daily function checks. The findings include: 1. Record review identified Resident #1 had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and delusional disorders, and Resident #1 had a Power of Attorney (POA) for care decisions and finances. Wander risk evaluation dated 1/10/2025 identified Resident #1 scored a 12 which indicated Resident #1 was a high wander risk. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/14/2025 identified an elopement risk/wanderer related to disoriented to place. Interventions directed to distract from wandering by offering diversions, identify patterns of wandering, reorient, and use of a wander guard bracelet. admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, regarding medication administration, the facility failed to ensure the failed to ensure only authorized personnel had access to the keys, including keys to the medication rooms and medications, and failed to ensure separately locked, permanently affixed compartments for the storage of controlled drugs was maintained. The findings include: Interview and continuous observations with RN #2 on 2/19/2025 at 10:26 AM in a hallway located near the kitchen identified she does not keep the nursing supervisor keys on her person because they are too heavy and stated she keeps them in the nursing supervisor office. Observation of the supervisor office (located on a different wing) identified the supervisor door was open and APRN #1, ADNS and Resident #4 were in the office near a desk. Resident #4 was standing and ambulated independently. RN #2 opened an unlocked top drawer next to the door, and removed two (2) rings of keys. RN #2 demonstrated she had keys to all areas of the facility, including medication storage,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for facility Administration review, the facility failed to ensure the facility administered its resources effectively and to ensure effective administrative oversight of staff and resident care timely to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of residents. The findings include: The facility administration failed to: Ensure a Governing Body was in place. Ensure the Medical Director was appointed by a Governing Body. Ensure the State Agency was notified timely of a reportable event. Ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate to include documentation or an RN assessment. Ensure prevent a resident with a known wander risk had access to unlocked egress from the facility. Ensure wander guard bracelet orders were accurate and timely. Ensure medications were secured and only authorized staff had access to keys. Ensure annual in-service training was completed timely. Ensure facility policies were reviewed and approved annually. Ensure there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0837 — isolatedEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility documentation, facility record review, and interviews for governing body review, the facility failed to ensure that they had a governing body, or designated persons functioning as a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies regarding the management and operation of the facility, and failed to ensure the Administrator was appointed by a governing body. The findings include: Review of facility documentation failed to identify a facility governing body. Review of the Administrator's employee file failed to identify the Administrator was appointed by the facility governing body. The review of facility policy and procedure master manual failed to identify an annual review of the facility policies was conducted. Review of facility Elopement Policy with no date provided on 2/19/2025, and review of facility Elopement Policy dated 6/2023 provided on 2/28/2025 identified the policies did not match. Interview with the DNS, Administrator, and Regional Nurse on 2/25/2025 at 11:36 AM identified the facility had three (3) Elopement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care, the facility failed to ensure the record was complete and accurate to include an RN assessment following an elopement. The findings include: Record review identified Resident #1 had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and delusional disorders. admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition, and ambulated independently. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/14/2025 identified an elopement risk/wanderer related to disoriented to place. Interventions directed to distract from wandering by offering diversions, identify patterns of wandering, reorient, and use wander guard bracelet. Facility reportable event dated 2/18/2025 at 5:00 AM identified Resident #1 was noted to be missing from his/her room at 4:00 AM. Staff were alerted and the building and grounds were searched.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility documentation review and interviews for two of five employee files (NA #2 and NA #3) reviewed for in-service training, the facility failed to ensure the Nurse Aides had 12 hours of annual training. The findings include: Review of NA #2 employee file identified NA #2 was hired on 8/10/2023. Additional review identified the only education provided during 2023, 2024 and through 2/27/2025 included Intravenous (IV) therapy education. No additional education, including general orientation education was provided. Review of NA #3 employee file identified NA #3 was hired on 7/20/2023. Additional review identified NA #3's annual education included education on resident rights, abuse/retaliation, and dementia. Review of facility employee files for NA #2 and NA #3 failed to identify 12 hours of annual in-service training was provided. Interview with the DNS on 2/27/2025 at 10:52 AM identified all NAs should have a minimum of 12 hours annual in-service training. The DNS was unable to explain why NA #2 and NA #3 did not have the required 12 hours of annual in-service education…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #7) who were reviewed for an allegation of abuse, the facility failed to ensure a staff member did not video tape the resident and post the video on social [NAME]. The findings include: Resident #7's diagnoses included Alzheimer's, depression, and agitation. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #7 had poor memory recall deficits, and was dependent on staff with transfers, personal hygiene, and dressing. The Resident Care Plan dated 11/5/24 identified Resident #7 had impaired thought processes related to Alzheimer's. Interventions directed to cue, anticipate needs, alleviate anxiety. The Facility Reported Incident report date1/14/25 at 12:00 PM identified a staff member reported that videos were recorded of a staff member interacting with residents in an unprofessional manner. The investigation identified in 1/14/25 a staff member brought…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation and staff interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #2), the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for an injury of unknown origin. The findings include: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in August 2024 with diagnoses that included dementia with behaviors, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depression. A Resident Care Plan dated 11/6/24 identified a problem with behaviors, being physically aggressive, destructive in his/her room, and was noted to take the television off of the wall in his/her room. Interventions included to allow Resident #2 to make decisions regarding treatment regimen, encourage participation during care and activities and praise the resident when behavior was appropriate. Nursing notes dated 12/3/24 through 12/10/24 identified that Resident #2 did not exhibit any negative behaviors or anxiety. The quarterly Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #3) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to complete neurological assessments following an unwitnessed fall, and for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #2), the facility failed to provide documentation of wrist stabilization per APRN recommendations following a fracture. The findings include: 1. Resident #1 had a diagnosis of dementia, falls, osteoporosis, and adjustment disorder. Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 indicating severely impaired cognition, no behaviors, required maximal assistance with toileting, and was independent with ambulation. Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/18/2025 identified a risk for falls and required assist with ADLs. Interventions directed to offer assistance with ADL's and was assist of one (1) for transfers. Facility incident report dated 1/18/2025 at 2:35…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for allegation of neglect, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for a resident with an allegation of neglect. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included spina bifida, neurogenic bladder and spinal stenosis. A physician's order dated 4/25/24 directed to ensure Resident #1 was turned and repositioned every two hours every shift for wound prevention. Braden scale dated 4/26/24 identified Resident #1 was at risk for developing pressure sores. The MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had no impairments in cognition, no behaviors, was incontinent of bowel and bladder and required extensive assistance of one staff for toilet use and bed mobility. The care plan dated 7/23/24 identified Resident #1 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to spina bifida. Interventions included to offer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #1), reviewed for activities of daily living, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required extensive assistance with activities of daily living was provided incontinent care and turning and repositioning in accordance with the plan of care and physician orders. The findings include: Resident #1 had diagnoses that included spina bifida, neurogenic bladder and spinal stenosis. A physician's order dated 4/25/24 directed to ensure Resident #1 was turned and repositioned every two hours, every shift for wound prevention. Braden scale dated 4/26/24 identified Resident #1 was at risk for developing pressure sores. The MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had no impairments in cognition, no behaviors, was incontinent of bowel and bladder and required extensive assistance of one staff for toilet use and bed mobility. The care plan dated 7/23/24 identified Resident #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for neglect, the facility failed to ensure appropriate staffing to meet the needs of the resident. The findings include: Resident #1 had diagnoses that included spina bifida, neurogenic bladder and spinal stenosis. A physician's order dated 4/25/24 directed to ensure Resident #1 was turned and repositioned every two hours, every shift for wound prevention. Braden scale dated 4/26/24 identified Resident #1 was at risk for developing pressure sores. The MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had no impairments in cognition, no behaviors, was incontinent of bowel and bladder and required extensive assistance of one staff for toilet use and bed mobility. The care plan dated 7/23/24 identified Resident #1 had an Activity of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to spina bifida with interventions that included to offer Resident #1 early care on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for a change in condition, the facility failed to ensure hospital discharge orders were acted on timely. The findings include: Resident #1 diagnoses included cellulitis and abscess of the mouth, Clostridium Difficile, malnutrition, and cerebral infarction (stroke). The Resident Care Plan dated 12/8/2023 identified a nutritional problem with a history of significant weight loss. Interventions directed to for signs and symptoms of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and to provide serve diet as ordered. Review of physician's orders dated 1/10/2024 directed regular texture diet, thin liquids. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was alert and oriented. Nursing note dated 2/19/2024 at 10:02 AM identified Resident #1 presented with increased facial swelling, numbness, and left side facial droop, unable to smile or raise…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of the environment, review of facility documentation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that resident areas , dinning room and equipment were maintained in a clean and comfortable homelike manner. The findings included: 1. Observation of Resident [NAME] room identified during the survey bath tile with chip paint. Please reference the following environment observations below: Observation during a tour to the facility on 5/30/23 of the environment identified on A C and D wings sink in need of repair, radiators in need of repair, toilets in need of repair, broken tiles on Resident [NAME] room, holes in walls, peeling paint, and wallpaper peeling. Interview with the DNS on 6/6/23 at 2:45 PM identified the facility maintenance staff conducted room audit for fixing and repairing walls, radiators toilet and other items that require repair on 6/5/23 and will begin completing repairs identified on the audit. 2. Observation on 6/1/2023 at 8:00 AM found the C/D Resident lounge and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-08 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility admission/ transfer discharge and staff interview, the facility failed to provided evidence of monthly notification to the state Regional Ombudsman Office of residents' transfers and discharge status in the facility. The finding include: A review of the facility admissions/ transfer and discharge on [DATE] from 3/2023 through 5/2023 failed to reflect that the facility had notified the state Regional Ombudsman Office of residents' transfers and discharge status in the facility monthly. Interview with the DNS on 6/8/23 at 1:57 PM identified she was unable to provide the missing documentation of monthly notification to the Regional Ombudsman Office of residents' transfers and discharge status from 3/2023 through 5/2023.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-08 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation and interviews for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #11) reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASSR), the facility failed to submit a PASSR level of care when a change in the resident's mental status The findings included: Resident # 11's diagnosis at the time of admission include dementia, hypertension, cancer heart failure and depression. A long-term approval of Nursing facility level of care for Resident # 11 dated 6/5/2020 indicated if serious mental illness is suspected or occurs and there is a change in treatment the facility needs to complete and submit and level of care. The readmission 5 day MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and required limited assistance with ADLs. Resident #11's diagnosis list indicated a diagnosis of bipolar disorder (new diagnosis of serious mental illness) was added on 7/28/2022. Resident # 11's diagnoses included dementia, and bipolar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy and interviews for 1 resident (Resident # 28) reviewed for Position, Mobility, the facility failed to ensure the physician's orders were followed for a resting hand splint and for 1 of 5 residents observed dining ( Resident # 24), the facility failed to follow facility practice for staff supervision during meal time to meet profession practice. The findings included: 1.Resident #28's diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, and neuralgia and neuritis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #28 as moderately cognitively intact and required one person assistance with toilet use, personal hygiene, bed mobility and transfers. The current Resident Care Plan a self-care deficit with activities of daily living, impaired cognitive function, and an alteration in musculoskeletal status related to right hand contracture. Interventions identified assistance needed in performing activities of daily living and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-08 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — patternProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for 1 sampled resident (Resident #7) reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to timely assist the resident with request to transfer to another facility and for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #51 and Resident # 369) reviewed for Hospice and /or death, the facility failed to ensure medically-related social services were provided. The findings included: The findings included: 1. Resident #7's diagnoses included intracranial injury, transient cerebral ischemic attack, heart failure, depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder with behavior disturbance. The Resident Care Plan dated [DATE] identified Resident #7 had behavior problems, refused care and was combative/accusatory towards staff at times. Interventions directed to anticipate, meet the residents needs and assist the resident to develop more appropriate methods of coping and interacting. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical records and interviews, for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident # 11), the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations that were approved by the physician were implemented and for Resident # 64, the pharmacy failed to notify the physician the resident's laboratory work was not completed . The findings included: 1. Resident #11's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, hypertension, heart failure, hyperlipidemia, and dementia. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #11 had mild cognitive impairment. The consultant pharmacist recommendations to Prescriber form dated 12/12/2022 indicated as a result of the pharmacist review recommendations were made to consider monitoring a fasting lipid panel on the next laboratory day and then once yearly thereafter if they are within normal limits. The form further indicated the physician agreed with the recommendations, and signed the form 12/12/2022, indicating to obtain a Complete Blood Count (CBC), lipid panel,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations of the noon tray line, review of facility documentation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide food at an appetizing temperature . The findings included: Observation with Dietary Director and Regional Food and Nutrition Service Director of the lunch tray line on 6/5/23 started at 12:20 PM identified the last cart left the kitchen at 12:55 PM and arrived at B Wing at 12:58 PM, serving began at 12:59 PM, and the last resident tray was served to Resident #88 at 1:05 PM. Tray line last tray's temperatures on 6/5/23 at 1:07 PM identified the following: that the main entry meal item (sausage) had a temperature (in degrees Fahrenheit) of 121.6/121. surveyor/Dietary Director temperatures _, potatoes at 121.5/117, corn at 130.8/130, and ice cream brought up to unit without being on ice had a somewhat liquid consistency in appearance at 19.4/19 . Review of Facility documentation of Holding Temperatures indicated sausage at 187 degrees, potatoes at 193 degrees, corn at 185 degrees and ice cream at freezer temperatures of 36-41 degrees.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of kitchen, facility documentation, and interviews, the facility failed to properly label foods, discard expired food, maintain, and rotate emergency food supply stock, and serve food at professional standards. The findings include: During the initial kitchen tour with the facility's Dietary Director on 6/5/2023 at 8:40 AM identified the following: a. The dry kitchen stock shelving contained 2 outdated thickened Apple Juice boxes. Additionally, contained several bags of oats with no expiration date, [NAME] grape jelly with no expiration or purchase date. b. The refrigerator contained bags of Milano's grated parmesan cheese (production date of 4/21/23), no expiration date, and cheddar cheese grated (production date of 4/26/23), no opened or expiration date. c. The shelving outside the refrigerator near the cooking prep area contained beef base with no label, and E &S brand chicken soup mix was in a bucket with no open or expiration dates. d. The canned goods area contained several cans of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews and staff interviews for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #29, Resident #32, Resident #77, and Resident #86) reviewed for dining, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience by ensuring all residents were served at the same time. The finding included: 1. Resident #29's diagnoses included cerebral infarction, anemia, and seizure disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #29 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene, and independent with set up for meals. 2. Resident #32's diagnoses included hemiplegia, diabetes mellitus, anxiety, and depression. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #32 was alert and cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of two persons for transfers, and toilet use, extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility, dressing, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for 1 sampled resident (Resident #7) reviewed for person-centered care planning, the facility failed to ensure interdisciplinary care plan meetings were held with the resident and/or Conservator of Person (COP) to ensure participation in the plan of care . The findings include: Resident #7's diagnoses included intracranial injury, transient cerebral ischemic attack, heart failure, depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder with behavior disturbance. The Resident Care Plan dated 2/7/23 identified Resident #7 had behavior problems, refused care and was combative/accusatory towards staff at times. Interventions directed to anticipate, meet the residents needs and assist the resident to develop more appropriate methods of coping and interacting. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 7 had intact cognition, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, locomotion,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of Resident Personal Funds Account statements and staff interviews for 2 sampled residents (Resident # 28 and Resident # 37), the facility failed to ensure the resident and /or responsible party received quarterly Personal Fund Account summaries. The findings included: 1. Resident # 28's diagnoses included heart failure, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #28 had slight cognitive impairment. 2. Resident #37's diagnoses included heart failure, cerebral vascular accident, hypertension, and dementia. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #37 was cognitively impaired. During an interview on 5/31/23 at 2:54 PM with Resident #37's COP identified s/he had received Personal Funds Account quarterly statements a few times. Resident # 37's COP also indicated it had been over 4 months since s/he had received a quarterly statement therefore s/he had to call the facility to inquire about the statement. The facility was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for 3 of 5 sampled resident (Residents #1, #7 and # 61) reviewed for advance directives, the facility failed to review the resident's advanced directives to reflect the code status wishes of the resident and/or responsible party/conservator of person (COP) following admission and re-admission from the hospital. The findings included: 1.Resident #1's diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, and personality disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 as cognitively intact and required supervision with bed mobility, transfers, eating and personal hygiene. The current Resident Care Plan identified use of psychotropic, antipsychotic and antidepressant medications, a mood problem related to major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and suicidal ideation. Interventions directed to administer medications as ordered, monitor and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Resident # 222) reviewed for abuse the facility failed to ensure the residents was free from verbal abuse and for ( Resident # 70), the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from physical abuse. The findings included: 1. Resident #222 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included acute embolism and thrombosis, schizophrenia, vascular dementia with behavior disturbances, mood disturbances and anxiety. The nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident smoke one pack of cigarettes daily. The nursing progress note dated 6/2/23 recorded at 3:59 PM identified Resident # 222 was involved in a verbal altercation with a staff member that included yelling and profanity. The resident and staff member were immediately separated, and the police and provider were updated. The conservatory, social worker and psychiatric were updated on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident # 57), the facility failed to implement facility policy for investigating an allegation of physical abuse within 5 working days. The findings include: 1 a. Resident #57's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD), Post- Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), schizophrenia, and anorexia. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #57 was alert and cognitively intact, required limited assistance of one person for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene, independent with bed mobility, transfers, ambulation and locomotion, and supervision with set up for eating. The RCP dated 5/28/23 for resident alleges that s/he was hit in the face by Resident # 66 with no injury. However, further review of the 5/28/23 noted a revision for 6/1/23 but failed to identify new intervention for 5/28/23 and 6/1/23. b. Resident # 66's diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #6 and # 57), the facility failed to implement facility policy for investigating and reporting an allegation of abuse to the state agency within 2 hours. The findings included: 1. Resident #6's diagnoses included major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 as cognitively intact and required limited assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The current Resident Care Plan 6/2023 identified assistance needed in performing activities of daily living with a notation of an allegation that a nurse used derogatory language and responded to Resident #6 inappropriately. Interventions directed to provide encouragement to participate in physical therapy, occupational therapy and speech therapy as indicated, to anticipate and meet the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #6 # and # 99), the facility failed to implement facility policy for protecting the resident during an investigation of allegation of abuse. The finding included: 1. Resident #6's diagnoses included major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 as cognitively intact and required limited assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The current Resident Care Plan 6/2023 identified assistance needed in performing activities of daily living with a notation of an allegation that a nurse used derogatory language and responded to Resident #6 inappropriately. Interventions directed to provide encouragement to participate in physical therapy, occupational therapy and speech therapy as indicated, to anticipate and meet the resident's needs, and to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interview for 1 of 3 sampled residents for (Resident # 118) reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to ensure the resident had a discharge care plan at the time of admission. The findings included: Resident #118; s diagnoses included adjustment disorder with anxiety, muscle weakness, Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), lower back pain, osteoarthritis of the knee, schizoaffective disorder, and hypertension. Resident # 118 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of the resident's clinical record failed to reflect an initial care for discharge planning at the time of admission. The nurse's note dated 3/20/23 at 12:47 PM identified Resident # 118 and the family requested the resident be discharged Against Medical Advice (AMA). Resident # 118 and family were educated regarding risk involved in leaving AMA. A review of Resident # 118 clinical record on 6/8/23 failed to identify a discharge care plan with short and long term goals and interventions. Record review and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident# 59) reviewed for specialized treatment, the facility failed to ensure the resident's care plan was revised to include a port in the right chest. The findings include: Resident # 59's diagnoses included in part, end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, and syncope. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 59 was cognitively intact and received a specialized treatment. The Resident Care Plan dated 04/25/2023 identified Resident #59 received hemodialysis three times a week. Interventions included in part to check the left arm fistula for bruit and thrill every shift check and to change the dressing daily at the access site, and not to draw blood or take a blood pressure in the arm with the graft. On 5/30/2023 at 1:15 PM an interview and observation of Resident # 59 and the resident's room identified no clamp or dressing near the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview for 1 of 3 residents (Resident # 118) reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to ensure the resident received a discharge summary prior to the resident's wishes to be discharge Against Medical Advice. The finding include: Resident #118; s diagnoses included adjustment disorder with anxiety, muscle weakness, Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), lower back pain, osteoarthrosis of the knee, schizoaffective disorder, and hypertension. Resident # 118 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of the resident's clinical record failed to reflect an initial care for discharge planning at the time of admission. A review of Resident # 118 clinical record failed to identify a discharge care plan. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of one to two people with ADLs. The nurse's note dated 3/20/23 at 12:47 PM identified Resident # 118 and the family requested the resident be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, and interviews for 1 of 1 sampled resident, (Resident #64) reviewed for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living), the facility failed to assist the resident with applying footwear. The findings include: Resident #64's diagnoses included dementia, spondylosis of lumbar (lower back) region, depression, anxiety disorder, transient cerebral ischemic attack (mini stroke), type 2 diabetes mellitus, and aphasia (inability to understand or express speech). A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #64 as alert and severely cognitively impaired, the resident required extensive assistance of one for toilet use, dressing, and personal hygiene, limited assistance of one for bed mobility and transfers, and supervision with set-up for eating. A Resident Care Plan dated 12/16/22 for impaired cognitive function and thought function secondary to a communication problem related to aphasia. Interventions included asking yes/no questions to determine needs by using…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, review of facility and staff interview for 1 of 3 residents at risk for pressure ulcer development for( Resident # 89), the facility failed to ensure that the resident's air mattress was set according to the plan of care and for 1 of 3 residents at risk for skin break down (Resident # 356), the facility failed to provide evidence that staff consistently turn and repositioned and off loaded the residents heel to prevent further skin breakdown. The finding included: 1. Resident #89's diagnoses included dementia, cerebral infarction, anemia, iron deficiency, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure. A Resident Care Plan dated 12/16/22 identified Resident # 89 at increased for skin breakdown secondary to fragile skin, compromised nutritional status, decreased ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL's) and decreased mobility. Interventions included: the use of a pressure reducing mattress, turning, and repositioning frequently to reduce risk of breakdown and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews for 1 sampled residents, (Resident #64), reviewed for accident, the facility failed to the resident received the necessary supervision to prevent an accident and for for 1 of 3 residents (Resident # 77) who require assistance with mechanical lift for transfers, the facility failed to ensure the resident's skin was safe during a transfer to prevent an injury. The findings include: 1. Resident #64's diagnoses included dementia, spondylosis of lumbar (lower back) region, depression, anxiety disorder, transient cerebral ischemic attack (mini stroke), type 2 diabetes mellitus, and aphasia (inability to understand or express speech). A Resident Care Plan dated 12/16/22 identified the resident had impaired cognitive function and thought function, and a communication problem related to aphasia, and noted the resident wanders due to impaired safety awareness. Interventions included ensuring wander guard was in place, distract resident from wandering by offering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, facility policy and interviews for 1 resident (Resident # 6) reviewed for Respiratory Care, the facility failed to ensure the physician's orders were followed regarding oxygen therapy. The findings include: 1. Resident #6's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and pulmonary hypertension. A physician's order dated 3/7/23 directed Resident # 6's oxygen to be worn continuously at two liters via nasal cannula and to keep oxygen saturation above 90% with titration, if needed, at hour of sleep. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 as cognitively intact and required limited assistance with toilet use, personal hygiene, bed mobility and dressing. The current Resident Care Plan identified assistance needed in performing activities of daily living secondary to diagnosis of COPD, and oxygen therapy related to respiratory illness. Interventions directed to provide encouragement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident# 59) reviewed for specialized treatment, the facility failed to ensure the resident's plan of care included emergency measures. The findings included: 1a. Resident # 59's diagnoses included in part, end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, and syncope. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 59 was cognitively intact and received a specialized treatment. The Resident Care Plan dated 04/25/2023 identified Resident #59 received hemodialysis three times a week. Interventions included in part to check the left arm fistula for bruit and thrill every shift check and to change the dressing daily at the access site, and not to draw blood or take a blood pressure in the arm with the graft. On 5/30/2023 at 1:15 PM an interview and observation of Resident # 59 and the resident's room identified no clamp or dressing near the resident's bed side.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient direct care staffing in accordance with quarterly Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) staffing data report. The findings include: The PBJ Staffing Data Report for Quarter 4, 2022 (July 1- September 30) identified submitted weekend staffing data is excessively low. The PBJ Staffing Data Report for Quarter 1, 2022 (October 1-December 31) identified submitted weekend staffing data is excessively low. Interview with the Administrator on 6/8/23 at 1:18 PM identified he was new in the position and was presently responsible for ensuring that direct care staffing levels were adequate. The Administrator further identified that the facility was using staffing strategies to ensure residents care was provided timely. The facility scheduled adequate numbers of nursing staff but there were many staff call outs and although attempted, they were unable to replace all the call outs. The Administrator indicated the facility was working with corporate regarding nurse aide wages and bonuses, on call staff was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was available and was reflective of actual staff worked. The findings include: Review of Daily Nurse Staffing information on 6/7/23 at 1:10 PM dated 5/19, 5/20 and 5/21/23 that was previously posted by the entrance to the facility identified: a. Daily Nurse Staffing Form dated 5/19/23 was not available for review. Interview with Scheduler #1 on 6/8/23 at 2:30 PM identified she was able to locate multiple Daily Nurse Staffing Forms at the front desk and in her office and indicated staffing data from 5/19/23 was missing. b. Daily Nurse Staffing Form dated 5/20/23 identified that 14 nurse aides were working during 7;00AM to 3:00PM shift. Review of the nursing daily staffing sheet identified that 12 nurse aides were actually working during that shift. Further review of the Daily Nurse Staffing Form identified that 12 nurse aides were working during the 3:00PM to 11:00 PM shift. Review of the nursing daily staffing sheet identified that 11…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews for 1 resident (Resident # 98) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to address the resident's Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) regarding fear of residents entering the room. The findings include: Resident # 98's diagnosis includes PTSD. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 98 as cognitively intact. Interview with Resident #98 on 5/30/23 at 10:54 AM identified s/he experienced Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) after experiencing a traumatic event in her/his past and the residents wandering into her/his room scare her/him and s/he is afraid that they will come in at night. Resident #98 indicated he/she had asked facility staff to do something about her/his concern to reduce her/his fear, but they just put a black and white paper stop sign up outside Resident #98' door, but residents still wandered into the room. On 6/07/23 at 3:20 PM an interview and record review with the DNS indicated per the care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interview for 1 of 18 residents observed during dining, the facility failed to ensure the residents diet consistency was followed according to the plan of care. The findings include: Resident #21's diagnoses included Myasthenia Gravis, Crohn's disease, and dementia. The resident's care plan dated 4/4/23 indicated Resident #21 had nutritional problems related to food preferences, fair oral intake history of wt. loss and the need for a mechanically altered diet texture. Intervention included: to provide diet as ordered, assist with feeding, and to provide double portions as resident #21 often reached for additional food items due to increased hunger. The care plan indicated Resident#21 had an alteration in gastrointestinal status related to the diagnosis of Crohn's disease. Interventions included in part to avoid foods or beverages that tend to irritate the esophageal lining like, acidic or spicy foods, chocolate, or caffeine. The quarterly Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — isolatedHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews for 1 of 3 residents for (Resident # 118) reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to ensure the social worker document a note regarding the resident's discharge status and failed to ensure the facility employed a social worker to assist with resident with resident psychosocial needs. The finding include: Resident #118; s diagnoses included adjustment disorder with anxiety, muscle weakness, Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), lower back pain, osteoarthrosis of the knee, schizoaffective disorder, and hypertension. Resident # 118 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of the resident's clinical record failed to reflect an initial care for discharge planning at the time of admission. A review of Resident # 118 clinical record failed to identify a discharge care plan. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of one to two people with ADLs. The nurse's note dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolatedHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the facilityQuality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program, review of facility documentation, review of policy and interviews, the facility failed to implement and maintain effective comprehensive, data driven QAPI program . The findings included: Interview on 5/30 2023 with the Medical Director at 2:00 PM indicated he attends the QAPI meetings that are held at the facility, and he is in contact with the DNS and the Administrator at least weekly regarding the facility issues. Interview with the DNS, the administrator and RN#1 on 6/8/2023 at 7:12 PM identified the Administrator and the DNS were new to their positions and the prior Administrator must have taken the QAPI paperwork when he/she left. The facility was able to produce a sign in sheets labeled medical staff meeting with the attendee's signatures including the medical director and all department heads who attended the quarterly meeting Although, the facility was unable to produce what issues or identified concerns had been previously worked on including the monitoring and evaluation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of the facility infection control program,, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to maintain measures to prevent growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens in building systems according to facility practice and failed to perform hand hygiene after picking up a glove from the floor after disinfecting a glucometer. The findings included: 1. Review of facility documents for measures to prevent growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens in building systems involved monthly/bimonthly system flushes in various areas of the facility per facility practice were not performed November 2022 through March 2023. Interview with Maintenance Director on 6/8/23 at 8:23 AM failed to indicate why the monthly/bimonthly water system flushes were not performed November 2022 through March 2023 per facility practice, however he did indicate there were staffing issues during that timeframe. Interview with the Facility Administrator on 6/8/23 at 8:29 AM failed to identify a policy related to performing monthly/bimonthly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #108 and Resident #43) reviewed for Infection Control, the facility failed to offer flu and pneumococcal vaccinations. The findings included: 1. Resident #108's diagnoses included acute respiratory failure, depression, and anxiety disorder. The Resident Care Plan dated 12/4/22 identified needing assistance with activities of daily living and a self-care performance deficit. Interventions directed to assist resident with activities of daily living and provide all care if unable to participate in activities of daily living The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #108 as cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with toilet use and personal hygiene. 2. Resident #43's diagnoses included end stage renal disease, major depressive disorder, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #43 as cognitively intact and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — isolatedReport COVID19 data to residents and families.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, interview for 1 sampled resident (Resident #320) reviewed for COVID-19 infection, the facility failed to timely inform the resident, and family representative by 5:00 PM the next calendar day following the occurrence of five confirmed COVID-19 infections. The findings include: Resident #320's diagnoses included diabetes, glaucoma, heart failure and chronic kidney disease. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #320 had moderately impaired cognition, required extensive assistance with transfer and locomotion on unit . Interview with Person #1 on 6/5/23 at 10 AM identified she/he had not been notified of residents who resided at the facility and tested positive for COVID-19 by 5/20/22. Interview with RN #5 Infection Preventionist (IP) on 6/6/23 at 10:48 AM identified during testing, symptomatic residents tested positive for COVID-19, as indicated by a rapid antigen test. Binax rapid antigen test was immediately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility policy and interviews for 1 sampled resident (Resident #108) reviewed for Infection Control, the facility failed to offer the Covid-19 vaccine to the resident. The findings include: Resident #108's diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, depression, and anxiety disorder. The Resident Care Plan dated 12/4/22 identified needing assistance with activities of daily living and a self-care performance deficit. Interventions directed to assist resident with activities of daily living and provide all care if unable to participate in his/her activities of daily living. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #108 as cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with toilet use and personal hygiene. Interview and review of clinical records with RN #5 on 6/8/23 at 10:44 AM failed to identify Resident #108 was offered the Covid 19 vaccine upon admission to the facility. RN #5 indicated residents should be offered the Covid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observation and staff interview for 1 of 3 residents at risk for pressure ulcer development for( Resident # 68), the facility failed to ensure that the resident's air mattress was check to ensure adequate and proper functioning of the mattress . The finding include: Resident #68's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and acute kidney failure. A Resident Care Plan dated 2/3/23 identified Resident #68 at increased risk of skin breakdown and pressure ulcer development, secondary to incontinence, decreased bed mobility. Interventions included daily skin inspections, assisted routine scheduled toileting, turning and repositioning. A physician order dated 2/3/23 directed Braden (skin assessment of residents at risk for forming pressure sores) every shift. A podiatry physician progress note dated 2/23/23 indicated Resident #68 had dry, cracked, scaly, atrophic (frail skin), thin skinned feet and recommended moisturizing lotion to both feet to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-03-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review and interviews for one of two residents (Resident #89) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure the resident's representative was notified timely when a new pressure ulcer was identified. The findings include: Resident #89's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure and dementia. The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 11/10/20 identified a score of 16, which indicated Resident #89 was at risk for developing pressure sores (a score of 15-18 indicates At Risk, and 13-14 indicates Moderate Risk). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #89 had moderately impaired cognition, required extensive assistance of one person with bed mobility, was at risk for developing pressure ulcers, and had no unhealed pressure ulcers at the time of the assessment. The assessment further identified pressure reducing devices were in place for Resident #89's bed and chair. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #92), the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for a resident injury of unknown origin. The findings include: Resident # 92's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting unspecified side, cerebral infarction, and intercostal pain. The annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #92 had severe cognitive impairment, and required extensive assistance with two people for all transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 8/31/20 identified an ADL self-care deficit. Interventions directed that Resident #92 was totally dependent on staff for dressing, personal hygiene and transfers. In addition, staff to don a right upper extremity sling when out of bed and off when in bed for a history of right sided weakness. Review of The Facility's Reportable Event for R#92 dated 9/4/20 identified that on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review and interviews for one of two residents (Resident #89) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure weekly skin audits were completed in accordance with physician's orders, and the facility failed to ensure a thorough nursing assessment was completed when a new pressure ulcer was identified. The findings include: Resident #89's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure and dementia. The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 11/10/20 identified a score of 16, which indicated Resident #89 was at risk for developing pressure sores (a score of 15-18 indicates At Risk, and 13-14 indicates Moderate Risk). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #89 had moderately impaired cognition, required extensive assistance of one person with bed mobility, was at risk for developing pressure ulcers, and had no unhealed pressure ulcers at the time of the assessment. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-03-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review and interviews for two of five residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications, (Resident #76 and Resident #95), the facility failed to ensure consistent target behavior monitoring for a resident with dementia who received antipsychotic medication, and the facility failed to ensure monitor targeted behaviors in accordance with physician's orders for a resident on an antipsychotic medication. The findings include: a. Resident #76's diagnoses included traumatic brain injury, diabetes, and vascular dementia. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #76 had severe cognitive impairment, exhibited physical behaviors towards others for four to six days out during the seven-day look-back period, and had received antipsychotic medication. The care plan dated 2/19/21 identified Resident #76 had a behavior problem related to history of agitation, self-inflicted scratches, yelling out, combative towards staff at times, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, and facility policy and procedures review for one sampled resident (Resident #68), the facility failed to place a resident with an active drug-resistant infection on appropriate isolation precautions. The findings include: Resident #68's diagnoses included heart failure, enterocolitis (E. Coli) due to clostridium difficile (not specified as recurrent), and Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamases (ESBL) infection in the urine. Review of the APRN note dated 2/25/21 at 1:27 PM noted that Resident #68 was being evaluated for follow-up regarding a urine culture, and Resident #68 was admitted for short term rehab with a history of congestive heart failure. Resident #68's urine culture returned positive for ESBL and E. Coli. Resident #68 was started on Ciprofloxacin empirically until the culture results returned, and plan to place Resident #68 on intravenous antibiotic (Imipenem) 1 gram every eight (8) hours for the next 1ten (10) days. Physician's orders dated 2/25/21 directed to place Resident #68 on Contact Precautions due to ESBL. Additional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-02-04 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel files and interviews for two (2) of four (4) personnel (Nurse Aide #2 and Nurse Aide #3) the facility failed to conduct annual performance evaluations. The findings include: Review of Nurse Aide (NA) #2's employee file identified the last performance evaluation was completed in 2/23. Review of NA #3's employee file identified the last performance evaluation was completed in 2/23. Interview with the Regional Clinical Nurse, RN #2, on 2/4/25 at 2:30 PM identified performance evaluations should be completed annually. RN #2 stated there had been several changes within administration, and the facility was in the process of reviewing overdue performance evaluations. Interview with the Administrator on 2/4/25 at 2:40 PM identified performance evaluations should be conducted yearly, and she had not been made aware that they had not been completed as expected by the former Director of Nursing (DON). Although requested an employee performance evaluation policy was not provided.
- No harm found · C2023-06-08 · tag F0570 — widespreadAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility's Resident Personal Fund Account and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a security bond was obtained in an amount substantial enough to cover the total amount of the Resident Personal Fund Account in the event of financial loss. The findings include: Review of the facility's Resident Personal Funds Account summary dated 4/13/2023 identified a total amount of money in the Resident Personal Funds Account of $19,181.46. The facility surety bond signed on 4/14/2023 was for $50,000.00 coverage with a continuation and effective of 5/1/2023 and a termination date of 5/1/2024. However, further review of the Resident Personal Funds Account dated 6/8/23 identified a total amount of $66,096.52. The facility surety bond as of 5/1/23 was for $50,000.00 (indicating 16,000.00 less than the amount in the Resident Personal Funds Account. Interview with the Administrator on 6/14/2023 at 9:10 AM indicated that now that he has been made aware the Resident Personal Funds Account exceeds the level of coverage of the surety bond, he will contact the surety bond…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-06-08 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility MDS submission report and staff interviews for 5 out 9 Resident Assessment for (Residents # 32, # 53, # 61, # 64 and # 111), the facility failed to ensure the residents assessments were submitted to the state agency within 14 days. The findings included: 1, A review of Residents # 32, # 53 and #111 on 6/8/23 MDS Assessments submitted to the state agency with the DNS on 6/8/23 at 4:50 PM identified the residents' assessments were 120 days past the due date. Interview with the DNS on 6/8/23 identified the MDS Coordinator at the facility resigned back in April 2023 and the facility in has recently hired two new MDS Coordinator. The DNS also indicated the corporate MDS Coordinator will be assisting the facility with late MDS assessment to ensure timeliness. 2. Resident #61's diagnoses included schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, and bipolar II disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #61 as cognitively intact and required a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-06-08 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to properly dispose of garbage and refuse properly. The findings include: Interview and observation on 6/5/23 during initial kitchen tour which began at 8:40 AM with Dietary Director identified an open uncovered, unattended garbage can containing disposed refuse near dishwashing area without staff being present. The Dietary Director was made aware of above for follow up.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$24,164 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $15,340 — penalty dated 2025-02-04
- $8,824 — penalty dated 2023-11-07
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIRLIS CHILDREN TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/22/2022 |
| ROSE, NATHAN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 12/22/2022 |
| MIRLIS, ELIYAHU | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/22/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CT
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075060. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.