Greenwich Woods Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

69.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 343 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 72.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 103 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.59 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 217 beds and averages 77.5 residents a day — about 36% occupied, or roughly 140 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · L2025-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility documentation, and interviews, the facility failed to follow the manufacturers' recommendations for replacing the Nephros water filters which were in place since [DATE], following a presumptive positive case of Legionella in a resident at the facility, and the facility failed to ensure that a positive Legionella water sample was reported to the State Agency in a timely manner. These failures resulted in the finding of Immediate Jeopardy. The findings include: The daily census report dated [DATE] identified a resident census of 83. The facility's total capacity is 217. The facility's layout consists of two floors with resident units on both floors. There are three nursing units on the first floor and four nursing units on the second floor with three of the units closed (no residents residing on the units) and one resident unit (Redwood) with twenty-three residents residing on the unit. On [DATE] at 9:00 AM the Administrator was asked to provide documentation of all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, (Resident #2), the facility failed to ensure a resident who is completely dependent on staff for transfers, wheelchair mobility, bed mobility and Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) remained free from significant injuries of unknown origin including bilateral (both sides) femur (bone in upper thigh) fractures. The findings include: Resident #2 had diagnoses that included vascular dementia, anxiety, depression, bipolar, and atrial fibrillation. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had short-term and long-term memory impairment (not capable of completing a brief interview for mental status exam), severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, dependent on staff for all ADLs, including bed mobility, and transfers, was non ambulatory and dependent on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for two of three sampled residents (Resident #33 and Resident #336) observed with medications at the bedside, the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered according to acceptable standards of practice and the facility failed to ensure that medication was not left at the resident's bedside for a resident who is without an order or assessment for self-administration. The findings include: 1. Resident #33's diagnoses included chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, hypoxemia, and acute cough. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #33 had severe cognitive impairment, required moderate assistance with toileting hygiene, and supervision or touch assistance with dressing and personal hygiene. The assessment further identified the resident uses a walker with supervision for ambulation. The care plan dated 3/13/25 identified Resident #33 had a memory/recall problem related…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the second-floor windows contained mechanisms to prevent them from fully opening, presenting a safety hazard to residents residing on the unit (dementia unit). The findings include: Observation on 3/10/25 at 10:05 AM identified in room [ROOM NUMBER](a resident room), the window was fully opened, and did not contain a screen. The degree to which the window was opened presented a safety hazard to residents who were able to access the window. Interview with NA #2 on 3/10/25 at 10:10 AM indicated that she was providing care to a resident in that room with NA#1 and NA #1 opened the window because it was very hot in the room. Interview with NA #1 on 3/10/25 at 10:15 AM identified she had opened the window in room [ROOM NUMBER] because while providing care to the resident she had gotten hot. NA #1 indicated that she was aware that windows are only supposed to open a little…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to complete license nurses and nurse aides education and competencies related to intravenous therapy (IV) therapy and the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses had intravenous therapy (IV) certificate. The findings included: 1. Review of the State Agency documentation identified the facility has a licensed bed capacity of 217 and an IV therapy program. Review of the census daily report dated 3/10/25 identified the facility census was 83 residents in the facility. A request was made on 3/17/25 for documentation of the annual licensed nurses and nurse aides IV competencies for 2023. The facility failed to provide any documentation regarding the completion of 2023 annual competencies. Review of the nursing IV competencies provided for 2024 identified only 15 of 29 licensed nurses received competency training in intravenous therapy (IV), and 17 of 43 nurse aides received competency training in intravenous therapy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for four of four medication carts, the facility failed to ensure shift to shift controlled drug counts were consistently completed. The findings include: Based on observations, review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 4 of 4 medication carts, the facility failed to ensure shift to shift controlled drug counts were consistently completed. The findings include: Observations on 3/18/25 between 1:44 PM - 2:00 PM of the medication carts with LPN #9 (IP from another facility) identified the February 2025 and March 2025 narcotic drug change of shift audit sheet (the narcotic count that the on-coming and off-going nurses complete to ensure the narcotic medications are counted) were missing signatures on multiple dates on the 7:00 AM - 3:00 PM shift, 3:00 PM - 11:00 PM shift, and 11:00 PM - 7:00 AM shift on the following units: The [NAME] 1 unit was missing 21 signatures for the month of February 2025, and 9 signatures for the month of March 1, 2025 - March 18,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for 5 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #14, 16, 24, 56, and 73) reviewed for immunizations, the facility failed to offer and provide influenza vaccine as required and for 4 of 5 residents (Resident #12, 26, 37, and 61) reviewed for immunizations, the facility failed to offer and provide pneumococcal vaccine as required. The findings include: Interview and review of facility immunization documentation with RN #1 (Infection Preventionist) on 3/17/2023 at 12:37 PM identified the following: a) Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and hypothyroidism. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #14 had severe cognitive impairment. The assessment further identified that Resident #14 influenza vaccination was not up to date. Review of Resident #14 clinical record on 3/17/25 at 12:37 PM failed to identified that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #2, 12, 19, 59, and 61) reviewed for immunizations, the facility failed to offer and provide Covid-19 immunizations as required. The findings include: Interview and review of facility immunization documentation with RN #1 (Infection Preventionist) on 3/17/2023 at 12:37 PM identified the following: 1) Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included fracture of shaft of left femur, difficulty walking, and muscle weakness. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had intact cognition. The assessment further identified that Resident #2 Covid-19 Booster vaccination was not up to date. Review of Resident #2 clinical record on 3/17/25 at 12:37 PM failed to identified that the Covid-19 Booster vaccine was offered and/or administered to the resident. Review of the Covid-19 immunization record identified Resident #2 had a consent for the vaccine.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for two of two sampled residents (Residents #9 and #336) reviewed for choices, the facility failed to ensure the resident's choices were accommodated when the resident requested to go to bed, and staff did not assist the resident for four hours and failed to ensure menu choices were provided at mealtime. The findings include: 1. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, difficulty walking, abnormal posture, pain, and peripheral neuropathy. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #9 had intact cognition, required partial to moderate assistance with personal hygiene, required total dependent with transfers (chair to bed/bed to chair), bed mobility, toileting, dressing, and utilized a wheelchair for mobility. The care plan dated 1/27/25 identified Resident #9 had an ADL (activities of daily living) function compromise and required substantial and maximal assist with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedure, and interviews for one of two sampled residents (Resident #335) reviewed for advanced directives, the facility failed to ensure consents were obtained regarding the resident's wishes regarding advance directives and decisions related to cardiopulmonary code status from the resident/responsible party. The findings include: Resident #335 was admitted to the facility in March/2025 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and cellulitis of the left lower limb. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #335 was moderately impaired cognition, required maximal assistance with dressing, toileting hygiene and bed mobility. The physician's order dated [DATE] directed full code (a full code means that if a person's heart stopped beating and/or they stopped breathing, all resuscitation procedures will be provided…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedure and interviews for one of two sampled residents (Resident #62) reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Record Review (PASRR), the facility failed to ensure that a Level 2 determination was completed when the 30-day approval stay expired. The findings include: Resident #62 was admitted to the facility in January/2025 and had diagnoses that included anxiety disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and squamous cell carcinoma The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #62 was cognitively intact, independent with personal hygiene, and was dependent on care with toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, and transfers. Review of the PASRR screen level 1 dated [DATE] identified Resident #62 was approved for 30 days. The Psychiatric APRN note dated [DATE] identified Resident #62 has a history of bipolar disorder. Interview with the Social Worker (SW) on [DATE] at 12:20 PM identified she is responsible…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for one of five sampled residents (Resident #62) reviewed for unnecessary medication the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were implemented and completed as prescribed by the physician and one of seven residents (Resident #335) reviewed for accidents the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered as prescribed by the physician. The findings include: 1. Resident #62's diagnoses included anxiety disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and squamous cell carcinoma. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #62 was cognitively intact, independent with personal hygiene, and was dependent on care with toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, and transfers. The assessment further identified the resident utilized antipsychotic (used for managing mental health disorders) medication which the assessment noted to be of the high-risk drug classes.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$130,496 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $122,478 — penalty dated 2025-03-19
• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-11-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT