No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Nathaniel Witherell, The

70 Parsonage Rd, Greenwich, CT 06830 · Government - City · 202 certified beds · (203) 618-4200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (203) 618-4200 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Dec 20241 actual-harm citation$4,516 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (7% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $4,516 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-30)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
49 Lake Ave · (203) 869-5700 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
90 E Putnam Ave · (203) 661-0631 · Call to confirm hours
Park
101 Orchard St · (203) 622-7814 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased25.1%18.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.2%6.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.4%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.5%22.3%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.7%3.5%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.5%16.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.3%17.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.3%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.7%4.0%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.8%24.7%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.7%17.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.2%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine80.7%69.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.3%24.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.9%10.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.272.061.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.441.461.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

29.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 196 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

29.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 203 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF29.4%CMS range 23.5–35.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 7.6–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge88.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 4.8–10.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.881.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.94
RN hours/ resident / day
0.84
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.60
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.38
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.67
RN hoursweekends
7.4%
Total nursing turnover
8.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 202 beds and averages 158.3 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.38 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.94 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.54 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.05 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 7% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-08-06)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2022-03-09)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

60 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and staff interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #30) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who required physical assistance with toileting received the necessary hands on supervision/support to prevent a fall. This failure resulted in the resident falling and sustaining an injury that required staples. The findings include:Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included mild cognitive impairment, spinal stenosis, anxiety, seizure disorder, and traumatic subdural hemorrhage.The Morse Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #30 was at high risk for falls with a score of 80 (a score of 0-24 indicates no risk, a score of 25-50 indicates low risk and a score of 51 or higher is indicative of high risk). The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 2/11/26 identified Resident #30 was at high risk for falls and had an activity of daily living (ADL)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to develop new fall interventions timely following a fall. The findings include:Resident #1 had a diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy, dementia, and glioblastoma. Nursing admission Note dated 12/19/2026 at 6:48 PM identified Resident #1 had a fall prior to admission to the facility, had impaired cognition and required assistance with personal hygiene. Physician order dated 12/19/2026 directed Aspirin (prevents blood clots) 81 mg daily. Facility incident report dated 12/19/2025 at 10:20 PM identified Resident #1 was observed sitting on the floor and sustained an abrasion to his/her mid back, was able to perform active and passive range of motion to all extremities and had no discomfort. The Resident Care Plan dated 12/19/2025 identified a high risk for falls. Interventions directed to ensure the call light was in reach and to ensure appropriate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation review and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to provide supervision for a resident with dementia and known risk of falls to prevent a fall with injury. The findings include:Resident #1 had a diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy, dementia, and glioblastoma. Nursing admission Note dated 12/19/2025 at 6:48 PM identified Resident #1 had a fall prior to admission to the facility, had impaired cognition and required assistance with personal hygiene. Physician order dated 12/19/2026 directed Aspirin (prevents blood clots) 81 mg daily. Facility incident report dated 12/19/2025 at 10:20 PM identified Resident #1 was observed sitting on the floor and sustained an abrasion to his/her mid back, was able to perform active and passive range of motion to all extremities and had no discomfort. The Resident Care Plan dated 12/19/2025 identified a high risk for falls. Interventions directed to ensure the call light…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed ensure staff did not move a resident after a fall resulting in resident complaint of pain. The findings include: Based on record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed ensure staff did not move a resident after a fall resulting in resident complaint of pain. The findings include: Resident #2 had diagnoses that included a history of dementia, falls, muscle weakness, and difficulty in walking. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had a BIMS of 10, indicating moderately impaired cognition, had no behaviors, required maximal assistance with toileting and ambulation, partial assistance with transfers, and was independent with mobility in a wheelchair. The Resident care plan dated 1/2/26 identified a self-care deficit and risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation, facility policy review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed to include a resident's transfer status. The findings include:Resident #1 had a diagnosis of hemiplegia (paralysis), hemiparesis (muscle weakness) affecting the left non-dominant side, and muscle weakness. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was alert and oriented (Brief Interview for Mental Status - BIMS - score of 15 out of 15) and was dependent for transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/17/2025 identified a deficit in activities of daily living (ADLs) and a risk for falls. Interventions directed to praise all efforts at self-care, and to ensure the resident's call light was in reach. Facility reportable event dated 7/2/2025 at 7:45 PM identified Nurse Aide (NA) #1 transferred Resident #1 into bed with use of a mechanical lift without a second…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure a resident diagnosed with diabetes had routine monitoring of hemoglobin A1C blood glucose levels. The findings include: Resident #1 had a diagnosis Type 2 diabetes (non-insulin dependent). The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was alert and oriented (Brief Interview for Mental Status - BIMS - score of 15 out of 15), had a diagnosis of diabetes, and received no insulin injections. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/17/2025 identified diabetes. Interventions directed nutritional follow up, diet as ordered, monitor lab work as ordered per physician. Facility reportable event dated 7/2/2025 at 7:45 PM identified Nurse Aide (NA) #1 transferred Resident #1 into bed with use of a mechanical lift without a second staff member present and Resident #1 fell to the floor. Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the resident was transferred in accordance with facility policy during a mechanical lift resulting in a resident fall. The findings include: Resident #1 had a diagnosis of hemiplegia (paralysis), hemiparesis (muscle weakness) affecting the left non-dominant side, and muscle weakness. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was alert and oriented (Brief Interview for Mental Status - BIMS - score of 15 out of 15) and was dependent for transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/17/2025 identified a deficit in activities of daily living (ADLs) and a risk for falls. Interventions directed to praise all efforts at self-care, and to ensure the resident's call light was in reach. Facility reportable event dated 7/2/2025 a5 7:45 PM identified Resident #1 was alert and oriented and required use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews for two of three sampled residents (Resident #1 and #2) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #2 were free from mistreatment. The findings include: 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses that included anxiety, depression, altered mental status, and adjustment disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 indicating severely impaired cognition and had no behaviors. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/15/2024 identified adjustment issues. Interventions directed to invite resident to activity programs and to encourage the resident to participate in conversation. Review of facility incident report dated 11/26/2024 at 7 PM identified on 11/25/2024 at 8 PM the evening supervisor reported an allegation of abuse was received from a NA instructor. The NA instructor indicated two student NAs worked on 11/25/2024 during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility record review for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the facility policy directed abuse education for student nurse aides prior to placement on a resident unit. The findings include: Please reference F609. Review of facility Elder Abuse, Neglect and Prevention Policies and Procedural Guidelines dated 10/9/23 identified staff to be trained to observe for and respond to actual or potential resident abuse. The Policy defined abuse and directed to provide mandatory, periodic and as needed training of all staff. Additional review failed to identify the facility policy directed abuse education prior to student nurse aides placement on a nursing unit. Interview and facility policy review with the DNS on 12/16/2024 at 11:30 AM identified the facility policy provides abuse education to staff, and the facility sends abuse education to the school to provide the education to the student nurse aides. The DNS was unable to provide documentation that the education was provided to the students, and stated she did not review any documentation prior to the students being placed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews for three sampled residents (Resident #1, 2 and 3) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure allegations of mistreatment were reported timely. The findings include: 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses that included anxiety, depression, altered mental status, and adjustment disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 indicating severely impaired cognition and had no behaviors. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/15/2024 identified adjustment issues. Interventions directed to invite resident to activity programs and to encourage the resident to participate in conversation. Review of facility incident report dated 11/26/2024 at 7 PM identified on 11/25/2024 at 8 PM the evening supervisor reported an allegation of abuse was received from a NA instructor. The NA instructor indicated two student NAs worked on 11/25/2024 during the evening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolated
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility documentation and staff interviews for staff education review, the facility failed to ensure students providing resident care were provided abuse education timely. The findings include: On 11/25/2024 on the 3 PM to 11 PM multiple student aides were in the facility from a local community Nurse Aide program for their clinical experience. Facility documentation review failed to identify abuse education was provided for the student aides prior to their providing resident care. Interview with the DNS on 12/20/2024 at 11:25 AM identified the facility did not have a process in place to provide student aides abuse education prior to the students providing resident care. The DNS further indicated that in the past the school program would be given an educational packet for the students to complete prior to their arrival at the facility for their clinical experience. The DNS stated she did not have any documentation that the abuse education was provided, and she did not follow up with the school instructors to ensure the educational packet was given and was completed prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 49 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate to include a fall intervention after the resident had a fall. The findings include: For Resident #1, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and interviews identified Resident #1 had diagnoses that included dementia, muscle weakness, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A physician's order dated 8/1/24 directed that Resident #1 can ambulate in the hallway with a rolling walker. The care plan dated 8/19/24 identified Resident #1 was a moderate risk for falls related to deconditioning with interventions that directed to encourage the resident not to rock back in the chair, encourage resident to use call bell for assist during the night to go to the bathroom, educate the resident and caregivers about safety reminders. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews, facility documentation review, and interviews for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #11, #86, #117 and #137) reviewed for infection control, the facility failed to ensure that infection control practices related to glucometer cleaning and disinfection in between resident and the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) carts were available outside every resident room who required the use of PPE, evidence of infection surveillance, evidence of annual review of the Intravenous and Infection Control Policy books, evidence facility water management plan and for 1 of 3 residents evaluated for pressure ulcers (Resident #24), the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when performing dressing changes and for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #25) reviewed for infection control, the facility failed to appropriate personal protection equipment (PPE) was worn while providing personal hands-on care to a resident on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 3 of 40 sampled residents (Resident #25, Resident #227 and Resident #228) reviewed for advanced directives, the facility failed ensure a resident's code status was complete and accurate for a newly admitted /readmitted resident. The findings included 1. Resident #25 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pneumonia, asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The admission record identified Resident #25 was not self-responsible. The Resident Code Status Form dated 7/22/24 did not identify a code status, was signed by the physician and was not signed by the responsible party or witness. The physician's orders dated 7/22/24 directed that Resident # 25 was to receive full code measures meaning lifesaving interventions would be initiated if necessitated. An interview with the Director of Nursing Services, (DNS) on 8/05/24 at 11:49 AM identified she would expect that the advanced directive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations and interviews for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory infection (Residents #91 and #276) the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised to reflect the resident status requiring transmission-based precautions and 1 of 1 resident (#117) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living, the facility failed to ensure the residents care plan reflected the bathing preference of the resident. The findings included. 1. Resident #91's diagnoses included anemia, hypertension and dementia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #91 was cognitively intact. The care plan dated 6/18/2024 indicated Resident #91 had impaired cognitive function related to dementia with interventions including in part to keep routine simple and consistent. A physician's order dated 7/16/2024 directed to provide transmission-based precautions for COVID 19 until 7/26/2024. Interview and record review with RN #3 the Assistant Director of Nursing Services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and review of facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure staff received ongoing education for Intravenous (IV) Therapy and perform competency evaluations to ensure staff remained competent to provide IV therapy. The findings include. Interview and facility document review with the DNS on 7/30/2024 at 12:05 PM identified s/he was unable to locate ongoing IV therapy education and competency evaluations for licensed nursing staff that provide IV therapy at the facility. The DNS further indicated the Infection Preventionist who was the only staff member who had access to the electronic files was not on duty and s/he now realized other staff members should have access in the event of his/her absence.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-06 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the tour of the kitchen, observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure dinner and breakfast were served within the 14-hour gap. The findings include: Tour of the kitchen on 7/24/24 at 10:00AM during the initial walk through with the Food Service Director identified the following: Interview with Dietary Director on 7/24/24 at 10:00AM identified residents are served meals between 8:00 AM to 9:30 AM and dinner is served by 6:30 PM. Interview on 7/24/24 at 11:23 am with Residents #18 and #126 indicated that breakfast arrives late. Observation on 7/25/24 at 10:20 AM, Resident #50 is observed in bed, NA was getting ready to start feeding Resident #50. Observation on 7/31/24 at 7:45 AM identified food carts arriving on the units between 7:45 AM to 8:00 AM. Observation on 7/31/24 at 7:50 AM of food cart identified the cart arriving to the 2nd floor dining area. Residents #101 and #118 was noted in the dining area and observed being served at 8:50 AM. Observation at 9:23AM of residents on 2nd floor (who eat in their room) were still not served ( Indicating a 15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the tour of the kitchen, observations, facility documentation, review of policy and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the dietary department consistently labeled food to reflect their age or shelf life and failed to ensure the nourishment fridge and snacks cabinets on each unit were adequately stocked. The findings included: A tour of the kitchen on 7/24/24 at 10:00AM during the initial walk through with the Food Service Director identified the following: a. The Pastry freezer was observed with a Boston Cream Pie without a label and noted with no open date. The preparation fridge was observed with mashed potatoes without a label or date. Interview with Food Service Director on 7/24/24 at 10:20 AM indicated the preparation staff and/ or chef are responsible for labeling items. After surveyor inquiry, the food items were labeled. Interview with Food Service Director on 7/24/24 at 10:30 AM indicated the facility does not have a snack cart. She/he reported each floor has nourishment refrigerators. b. Observation of the nourishment refrigerator and snack cabinets…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility Infection Control program, review of facility document, facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an Antibiotic Stewardship Program was in place and available for review. The findings include. An interview and facility document review on 7/30/2024 with the DNS indicated the Infection Preventionist (IP) was out of the facility and the Antibiotic Stewardship information along with the infection control program was on the computer and the IP was the only person who had access. The DNS was able to provide a facility policy for Antibiotic Stewardship, unknown date of last annual review, and the pharmacy list of antibiotics used for the last month. The DNS was also unable to provide evidence of an Antibiotic Stewardship Program actively in place. The DNS further indicated that in lieu of the absence of the IP other staff should be able to gain access to the files for the infection control program. On 7/31/2024 at 12:15 PM the Assistant Director of Nursing Services (ADNS) indicated the Staff Development Nurse (IP back up Wednesday…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident # 226) reviewed for change in condition, the facility failed ensure the physician was notified of a resident change in condition in a timely manner. The findings include: Resident #226 was admitted with diagnoses that included osteoarthritis of the left knee and hypertension. The admission clinical record identified Resident #226 as self-responsible. The hospital Inter-Agency Referral Report dated 7/22/24 identified Resident #226 was discharged with medications that include Valsartan (Anti-hypertensive) 80 Milligrams (MG) once daily. The nursing admission note dated 7/22/24 at 5:23 PM identified Resident #226 was alert and oriented to person place and time, communicated verbally, speech was clear, was able to understand and be understood when speaking. The physician's orders dated 7/22/24 directed Valsartan 80 MG once daily in the morning at 9:00 AM. The Blood Pressure log dated 7/22/24 at 4:19 PM identified Resident #226's BP was 165 / 83 (Normal Range…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1of 3 sampled residents (Resident #35) reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to follow up with a resident reported concerns in a timely manner. The findings include: Resident #35's diagnoses included obesity and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 35 was cognitively intact and required partial to moderate assist with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and supervision with eating. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 7/6/24 identified Resident #35 had- a concern related to psychosocial wellbeing related to anxiety. Interventions directed to provide staff assistance and support to set realistic goals. A Social Service Note dated 7/15/24 identified Resident #35 indicated s/he felt ok and was not depressed. No questions or concerns were reported, and social services would be available to provide continued support. An interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview for one of three residents (Resident #227) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure an alleged staff member was removed from the schedule after an allegation of mistreatment. The findings include: Resident #227 had a diagnosis of anxiety and history of a fall. Incident report dated 7/25/2024 at 2 PM identified Resident #227 alleged he/she rang the call bell around 3 AM and the NA stated, you know it is 3 in the morning. Resident #227 had been incontinent of urine and stool and alleged while the NA was giving care she pushed the towel into me and was rough. When the NA turned Resident #227 over, Resident #227 alleged he/she was nervous and reached out to hold onto the NA's arm for comfort, saying I am very nervous. The NA was alleged to respond by saying do not touch me. Nursing note dated 7/25/24 identified abuse was reported, and an investigation was started. The resident alleged the NA was rough on him/her. The supervisor and Director of Nursing (DNS) were notified. Record review identified NA #8 was not working when the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-06 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #176) reviewed for discharge planning, the facility failed to ensure Durable Medical Equipment (DME) was ordered timely for a planned discharge. The findings include: Resident # 176's diagnoses included foot drop of right and left feet, polyneuropathy (damage to nerves in the body), and hemiplegia (partial or complete inability to move a part of the body) unspecified affecting right dominant side. Physical Therapy (PT) note dated 6/16/2023 recommended that Resident #176 was to be discharged home with a Hoyer lift. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #176 was dependent for ADLs. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/20/2023 identified decreased mobility and weakness, impaired ability to self-transfer, and high risk for falling. Interventions directed assist with transfers. Inter-agency patient referral report dated 9/14/2023 for a planned…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-06 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #109) reviewed for change in condition, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change Status Assessment (SCSA) MDS assessment when the resident was admitted to hospice. The findings include: Resident #109 's diagnoses included adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. Review of Consent and Election of Medicare Hospice Benefit dated 6/1/24 identified Resident #109 elected for Medicare Hospice benefit. The nurse's notes dated 6/2/24 at 2:46 PM identified the hospice nurse assessed Resident #109 for hospice care and s/he was admitted to hospice care. The recreation notes dated 6/3/24 at 2:15 PM identified Resident #109 was in hospice care and the end-of-life service would continue to provide 1 to 1 bedside support and assist as needed. The physician's order dated 6/3/24 directed Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) and noted hospice. The Significant Change MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews for 1 of 3 residents ( Resident #117) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living, the facility failed to ensure a resident received a shower on per plan of care. The findings include. Resident #117 diagnosis included diabetes mellitus and anemia The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #117 required partial/moderate assistance for bathing. The care plan dated 7/31/2024 indicated Resident #117 had an ADL deficit due to fatigue and anemia with intervention for the resident prefers dressing and grooming for AM care An interview and record review on 7/31/2024 at 11:40 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN # 6) indicated per the posted shower list, not dated, Resident #117 had a shower scheduled weekly on Monday on the 3-11 PM shift. LPN # 6 was not able to find the Nurse Aides documentation of showers being provided but indicated if the resident refuses a shower s/he LPN # 6 who document the refusal in the progress notes. An interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record and facility policy and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #426) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to follow physicians order regarding pressure reliving device. The findings include: Resident #426's diagnoses included muscle weakness and unspecified dementia. The care plan dated 6/20/24 identified pressure ulcer. Interventions include providing wound care per treatment order. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #426 is cognitively impaired. Resident #426 requires one person to assist in bed mobility and toilet use and requires two-person physical assist in transfers. A progress notes dated 7/23/ 24 identified new Deep Tissue Injury measuring 2 Centimeter (CM) x 2 CM x 0 CM. Calculated area is 4 square CM. A physician's order dated 7/24/24 at 3:30 PM and 5:00 PM directed When available-bilateral waffle boots to bilateral feel at all times for pressure relief of heels. Remove for hygiene only. and to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, review of facility documentation, review of policy and staff interviews for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents for( Resident # 22), the facility failed to implement intervention to prevent future falls and for (Resident #47), the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision of a resident who left a nursing unit unauthorized .The findings include The findings included: 1.Resident #22's diagnoses included Muscle weakness, difficulty walking and history of falls. The care plan dated 4/5/24 indicated Resident #22 was a fall risk and interventions include to place Resident #22 in the common area for close monitoring and to not leave the resident alone in the room until family member arrives. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #22 has impaired cognition. Resident #22 requires maximal assistance in toilet transfers, chair to bed transfers and sit to stand. A physician's order dated 7/30/24 directed to check placement in lowest position…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #35) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to confirm weight loss according to policy. The findings include: Resident #35 's diagnoses included obesity and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident # 35 as cognitively intact and required partial to moderate assist with activities of daily living and supervision with eating. The Resident Care Plan dated 7/6/24 identified Resident #35 had a nutritional problem related to comorbidities. Interventions directed to assist with meals as needed and monitor weight weekly. The weight record log dated 7/14/24 identified a recorded weight of 156.8 lbs. The weight record dated 7/20/24 identified a recorded weight of 144.2 lbs. reflecting a -8.16 % loss with no documented re-weight. An interview with the Dietitian on 8/01/24 01:34 PM identified nursing staff were responsible for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for one of three residents (Resident #227) reviewed for abuse the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate to include an RN assessment after an allegation of mistreatment. The findings include: Resident #227 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of fracture of left femur, anxiety, and fall. The nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #227 was alert and oriented and required assistance with ADLs. Incident report dated 7/25/2024 at 2 PM identified Resident #227 alleged he/she rang the call bell around 3 AM and the NA stated, you know it is 3 in the morning. Resident #227 had been incontinent of urine and stool and alleged while the NA was giving care she pushed the towel into me and was rough. When the NA turned Resident #227 over, Resident #227 alleged he/she was nervous and reached out to hold onto the NA's arm for comfort, saying I am very nervous. The NA was alleged to respond by saying do not touch me.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for a fall, a facility staff member failed to report a fall to the licensed staff when the resident had reported the unwitnessed fall so an assessment could be conducted to determine if the resident had sustained an injury or struck their head. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, difficulty walking, generalized muscle weakness, a history of urinary tract infections and osteoarthritis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 rarely or never made decisions regarding tasks of daily living, required maximum assistance with toileting, moderate assistance with turning and repositioning when in bed and getting in and out of the bed and chair, supervision or touching assistance when ambulating, and utilized a walker when ambulating and wheelchair for mobility. The Resident Care Plan dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #1), reviewed for a change in condition, the facility failed to ensure a change in condition it was reported timely to the physician timely and failed to report a change in condition to a responsible party. The findings include: 1) Resident # 1 had diagnoses that included hypertension, generalized muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and dysphagia. Review of a face sheet dated [DATE] identified that Resident #1's responsible party was Person #1. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition, was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder, and required extensive assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). A care plan dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had impaired ability to self-transfer, ambulate, dress, toilet, and maintain personal hygiene with interventions that directed to provide extensive assistance with bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3)residents, (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from physical abuse. The findings include: Resident # 1 had diagnoses that included displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left hip, osteoporosis, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and difficulty walking. The nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had intact cognition, was continent of bowel and bladder, and required moderate assistance with bed mobility, transfers, personal hygiene, toileting, and dressing. The care plan dated 2/7/2024 identified Resident #2 had acute pain secondary to hip surgery with interventions that directed to administer pain medication per order and evaluate effectiveness of pain-relieving interventions. A physician's order dated 2/7/2024 directed to administer Resident #1 oxycodone 10 milligrams (a narcotic pain medication) every six hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) Residents, (Resident #1), reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state agency within the required time frame. The findings include: Please cross reference F 600 Resident # 1 had diagnoses that included displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left hip, osteoporosis, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and difficulty walking. The nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had intact cognition, was continent of bowel and bladder, and required moderate assistance with bed mobility, transfers, personal hygiene, toileting, and dressing. The care plan dated 2/7/2024 identified Resident #2 had acute pain secondary to hip surgery with interventions directed to administer pain medication per order and evaluate effectiveness of pain-relieving interventions. A physician's order dated 2/7/2024 directed to administer Resident #1 oxycodone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3)residents, (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to conduct a complete and thorough investigation for an allegation of abuse. The findings include: Resident # 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left hip, osteoporosis, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and difficulty walking. Please cross reference F 600 The nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had intact cognition, was continent of bowel and bladder, and required moderate assistance with bed mobility, transfers, personal hygiene, toileting, and dressing. The care plan dated 2/7/2024 identified Resident #2 had acute pain secondary to hip surgery. Interventions directed to administer pain medication per order and evaluate effectiveness of pain-relieving interventions. A physician's order dated 2/7/2024 directed to administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for wound care, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a declining wound was seen at a wound center as recommended by the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) and the clinical record failed to reflect documentation the attending physician or APRN assessed the wound. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included vascular dementia, history of transient ischemic attach and cerebral infarction, anemia, muscle weakness, and Vitamin B-12 deficiency anemia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 rarely or never made decisions regarding tasks of daily life, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, required extensive assistance with turning and repositioning while in bed, and getting in and out of the bed and chair, and was totally dependent with dressing and personal hygiene. The Resident Care Plan dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #1) , reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to a State Agency and to immediately remove an alleged employee off the schedule in a timely manner after an allegation of abuse was identified. The findings include: Resident #1 had diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, and sepsis. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 07/14/23 identified Resident #1 is on anticoagulant therapy. Interventions include administering anticoagulants and evaluating effectiveness and to observe for signs of active bleeding (nosebleeds, bleeding gums, petechiae, purpura, ecchymotic areas, hematoma, blood in urine, blood in stools, hemoptysis, elevated temperatures, pain in joints, and abdominal pain). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderately impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #2), reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated in a dignifed manner. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included irritable bowel syndrome, delusional disorders, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 made consistent and reasonable decisions regarding tasks of daily life and was supervision for locomotion and transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 05/17/23 identified Resident #2 may refuse care related to assistance with dressing. At times, resident rejects being incontinent and may appear oblivious when incontinent of stool and urine with interventions that included to approach in a calm manner, redirect back to unit if soiled/incontinent, educate resident to call for assistance if he/she is incontinent of stool, and encourage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the environment was maintained in a homelike manner. The findings include: Observations on 3/1/22 at 7:27 AM through 7:33 AM, with the Administrator and Maintenance Supervisor on the 4th floor, and 1st floor identified the following issues: 1. Damaged, chipped, marred, and peeling paint on the doors in the bathroom on 1st floor unit in rooms 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 114, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, and 125. Additionally on the 4th floor unit in rooms 401, 403, 404, 405, 411, 414, 415, 416, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, and 425, and the hallways on the 4th floor. 2. Damaged and stains on bedroom ceiling tiles in bedroom [ROOM NUMBER]. 3. Damage, chipped, marred bedroom wall in bedroom [ROOM NUMBER] and 416. Review of the environmental round forms 1/1/21 through 3/1/22 identified environmental rounds were only completed and documented twice, on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 5 residents (Resident #54, 122, 162, 272, and 274) reviewed for immunizations, the facility failed to obtain and document consent or declination and administer the Prevnar 13 and Pneumococcal 23 vaccinations. The findings include: 1. Resident # 54 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dysphagia following cerebral infarction and transient ischemic attack. Review of the clinical record failed to reflect the Prevnar 13 vaccination had been offered and/or administered. 2. Resident #122 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included aspiration pneumonia, and Parkinson disease. Review of the clinical record failed to reflect the Prevnar 13 vaccination had been offered and/or administered. 3. Resident # 162 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included diabetes. Review of the clinical record failed to reflect the Prevnar 13 and Pneumococcal 23 vaccinations had been offered and/or administered. 4. Resident # 272 was admitted to the facility with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one of four sampled residents (Residents #97) who were reviewed for an allegation of mistreatment, the facility failed to ensure the resident was treated in a manner that maintained the resident's dignity and respect. The findings include: Resident #97's diagnoses included dementia with Lewy Bodies dementia, cognitive communication deficit, agitation, and restlessness. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #97 rarely or never made self-understood, rarely or never understood others, had short and long-term memory problems, and rarely or never made decisions regarding tasks of daily life. The Resident Care Plan dated 7/29/21 identified Resident #97 was often resistive and combative to care, hitting, grabbing, and pinching staff. Interventions directed when resistive to return in thirty (30) minutes to continue care and consistency of caregivers. The nurse's note dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #162) reviewed for notification of change, the facility failed to ensure the physician and family were notified of a weight loss. The findings include: Resident #162 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes and a lumbar laminectomy, and osteomyelitis of back. The hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] noted Resident #162 weighted 169.6 lbs. The weekly weight sheet dated 11/12/21 identified Resident #162 weighed 175.3 lbs. Hospital documentation dated 11/24/21 identified Resident #162 weighed 177.3 lbs. The weekly weight sheet dated 11/26/21 identified Resident #162 weighed 160 lbs. a loss of 9.6 lbs. The weekly weight sheet dated 12/3 and 12/10/21 identified Resident #162 was at the hospital. Hospital documentation dated 12/15/21 identified Resident #162 weighed 168 lbs. The weekly weight sheet dated 12/16/21 identified Resident #162…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #128) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure Resident #128 was free from abuse by Resident #39. The findings include: a. Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease and anxiety disorder. The MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #39 had moderately impaired cognition and required limited assistance with locomotion on and off the unit. The care plan dated 9/16/21 identified Resident #39 had cognitive loss/dementia and behavioral symptoms by being socially inappropriate, and repeatedly approaching other residents. Interventions included to supervise while out of bed and ambulating on the unit, allow resident to have control over situations if possible and if anxious or combative, leave, reproach and notify the nurse. b. Resident #128 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one of four sampled residents (Residents #97) who were reviewed for an allegation of mistreatment, the facility failed to report the results of the investigation within five (5) working days to the state agency. The findings include: Resident #97's diagnoses included dementia with Lewy Bodies dementia, cognitive communication deficit, agitation, and restlessness. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #97 rarely or never made self-understood, rarely or never understood others, had short and long-term memory problems, and rarely or never made decisions regarding tasks of daily life. The Resident Care Plan dated 7/29/21 identified Resident #97 was often resistive and combative to care, hitting, grabbing, and pinching staff. Interventions directed when resistive to return in thirty (30) minutes to continue care and consistency of caregivers. The nurse's note dated 9/13/21 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-09 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 (Resident #67) reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), the facility failed to ensure recommendations for a re-evaluation were requested in accordance with established timeframes. The findings include: Resident #67 was admitted with diagnoses that included heart failure and hypertension. A PASRR Level I screen dated 11/12/12 identified Resident #67 did not have a diagnosis of mental illness or dementia with recommendations to submit for evaluation if there was a change in treatments needs or suspected of a serious mental illness. Resident #67 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, psychosis and major depressive disorder. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #67 had a diagnosis of serious mental illness with no associated PASARR coding. Interview with APRN #1 on 2/28/22 at 2:36 PM identified Resident #67's behaviors were associated with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-09 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 Residents (Resident #271) reviewed for dialysis, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan for dialysis management. The findings include: Resident #271 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart transplant, end stage renal disease, acute kidney failure, and dependance on renal dialysis. The baseline care plan dated 2/15/22 failed to reflect interventions to address the resident's dialysis needs. A physician's order dated 2/16/22 directed to send Resident #271 to dialysis on Tuesday/Thursday/Saturday 8:00 AM - 2:00 PM. Monitor right upper chest permacath for signs and symptoms of infection every shift. Vital signs Tuesday/Thursday/Saturday after dialysis between 5:00 PM - 11:00 PM. Additionally, residents who require off site dialysis will have their access site checked for signs of infection or bleeding daily and will have their blood pressure taken upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation and interviews for 1of 4 residents (Residents #97) who were reviewed for an allegation of mistreatment, the facility failed to review and revise the plan of care to address an incident between a staff member and the resident, and for 2 residents (Resident #39 and 128) reviewed for falls and resident to resident abuse, the facility failed revise the care plan following repeated falls and failed to ensure the care plan was revised for a resident who was the victim of physical abuse. The findings include: 1. Resident #97's diagnoses included dementia with Lewy Bodies dementia, cognitive communication deficit, agitation, and restlessness. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #97 rarely or never made self-understood, rarely or never understood others, had short and long-term memory problems, and rarely or never made decisions regarding tasks of daily life. The Resident Care Plan dated 7/29/21 identified Resident #97…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-09 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 residents (Resident # 54 and #122) reviewed for Cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR), the facility failed to ensure facility staff had immediately documented discussions with the resident or resident representative, the resident's wishes with regard to CPR or DNR, upon admission including, as appropriate, a resident's wish to refuse CPR. The findings include: 1. The hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] identified Resident #54 was status post cervical spinal fusion, closed nondisplaced fifth cervical vertebra, and dysphagia following a stroke. The Pre-admission assessment dated [DATE] identified the residents code status at current hospital and nursing home was no code, Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), and no ACLS. Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphagia following cerebral infarction and transient ischemic attack. The admission MDS dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #97) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure recommendations were responded to for a resident requiring psychiatric services. The findings include: Resident #97 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with Lewy bodies, psychosis and anxiety disorder. The MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #97 had severely impaired cognition, required extensive assistance with personal care and received antipsychotic medications. The care plan dated 7/29/21 identified Resident #97 was at risk for consequences related to receiving antipsychotic medications. Interventions included to assess for effectiveness and monitor behaviors. A Physician's order dated 8/1/21 directed to administer Seroquel (antipsychotic medication) 75mg twice daily. A psychiatric consultation dated 8/19/21 recommended to increase the Seroquel to 75mg in the morning and 100mg in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #162) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to monitor weights and implement dietary recommendations. The findings include: Resident #162 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes and a lumbar laminectomy, and osteomyelitis of back. The weekly weight sheet dated 11/12/21 identified Resident #162 weighed 175.3 lbs. Hospital documentation dated 11/24/21 identified Resident #162 weighed 177.3 lbs. The weekly weight sheet dated 11/26/21 identified Resident #162 weighed 160 lbs. a loss of 9.6 lbs. The weekly weight sheet dated 12/3 and 12/10/21 identified Resident #162 was at the hospital. Hospital documentation dated 12/15/21 identified Resident #162 weighed 168 lbs. The weekly weight sheet dated 12/16/21 identified Resident #162 weighed 146 lbs. A dietitian assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #162 had a 29 lbs. unintentional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #106), reviewed for dialysis the facility failed to monitor the dialysis access site (Arterio-Venous (AV) fistula) for a thrill/bruit and failed to ensure that the resident was assess for signs and symptoms of infection and bleeding. The findings included: Resident #106's diagnoses included end stage renal disease, anemia in chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and hypertension. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #106 had severely impaired cognition, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing and personal hygiene. Review of hospital documentation dated 8/20/21 identified Resident #106 underwent a creation of a left AV fistula. Upon completing the procedure, the resident had a strong pulse in the brachial artery and there was a good thrill in the fistula. A physician's order dated 9/7/21 directed Resident #106 receive dialysis Monday, Wednesday and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy, and interviews, for 4 of 6 medication carts, the facility failed to maintain medication carts in a clean and sanitary manner and failed to ensure a medication cart was secured and in a designated area. The findings include: 1. Observation of the first floor unit medication cart on 3/1/22 at 9:05 AM with the DNS and LPN #2 identified a moderate amount of loose pills of assorted sizes and colors and blister pack back covers located at the bottom of the first and second drawer. Interview with LPN #2 on 3/1/22 at 9:05 AM identified she was not aware of the loose pills and blister pack back covers located at the bottom of the first and second drawer. LPN #2 indicated it is every nurse responsibility to clean the medication cart and after themselves. 2. Observation of the second floor unit medication cart on 3/1/22 at 9:15 AM with the DNS and LPN #3 identified moderate amount of loose pills of assorted sizes and colors and blister pack back covers located at the bottom of the first and second drawer. Interview with LPN #3 on 3/1/22 at 9:15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner and failed to ensure food items were covered and dated according to policy. The findings include: Observation on 2/27/22 at 7:15AM identified of the kitchen identified the following: Dry storage room with moderate amounts dry food spillage under (2) racks. Kitchen floor with moderate amount of dry brown spillage and dried crusted flecks of white material with concentrated under food counters and sides of wall. Refrigerator identified as 'milk cooler' with moderate amount dried brown spillage around the sides and under racks. Three- and one-half trays of gelatin cups not covered and without a date. A steel container containing tuna salad without a date. Refrigerator identified as 'cold food cooler' in the main kitchen and a larger 'cold food cooler in the back of the kitchen with moderate amounts of congealed brown spillage on the floor including under the racks in the refrigerator with moderate amount green…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policies and procedures, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #83) reviewed for mistreatment, the facility failed to treat the resident in a dignified manner. The findings include: Resident # 83's diagnoses included Depression, Mental Retardation with psychosis, and Cerebral Palsy. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #83 was without cognitive impairment. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 7/31/18 identified a history of being verbally abusive with peers, known to fabricate stories and had issues which included yelling, screaming, pointing his/her finger and shouting at staff. Interventions directed to provide quiet, non hurried environment, redirect inappropriate behavior, monitor behaviors, involve the resident in decision making, and speak clearly and adjust tone as needed. Review of the physician's order dated 7/1/18 directed to apply Salonpas (methyl salicylate-menthol)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-09 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for one of two sampled residents reviewed for choices (Resident #55), the facility failed to ensure Resident #55's preference related to getting out of bed was followed. The findings include: Resident #55's diagnoses included dysphagia, type 2 diabetes, dementia without behavioral disturbance, and major depressive disorder. A Recreational therapy note dated 3/18/19 at 11:34 AM identified that Resident #55 was alert and oriented to place and person, able to make needs known, needs reminders and prompting at times due to confusion and forgetfulness. A Social Service note dated 4/23/19 at 9:47 AM identified that Resident #55 was moving to a new room on 4/29/19. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #55 was without cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing and toilet use. The Resident Care Plan (RCP)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical records reviewed, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #145) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to keep the resident free from abuse. The findings include: Resident # 145's diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbance and anxiety disorder. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #145 was severely cognitively impaired. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 7/12/18 identified a cognitive memory/recall problem related to dementia and anxiety with interventions directed to provide verbal and visual reminders to the resident. Review of the reportable event dated 8/2/18 at 10:45 AM identified that Person #3 heard yelling from the dining room. Person #3 went to the dining room and observed Dietary Aid #1 yelling at Resident #145 for touching the napkins that he had set at the table. Person #3 also observed Dietary Aid #1 pulling the chair out with full force where the resident was seated.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical records, facility documentation, facility policies and procedures, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #41) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of a bruise of unknown origin in accordance to facility policy. The findings include: Resident #41's diagnoses included vascular dementia and anxiety disorder. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #41 without cognitive impairment and required total assistance with two for transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/14/18 identified a potential for skin tears or lacerations related to accidentally scratching him/herself while upset in the past and skin tears over purpura with interventions directed to analyze resident's injuries to determine pattern/trend, keep skin lubricated with lotion, and monitor the skin and report any signs of skin tears and infections. Further review of the RCP identified a behavior plan where the resident has expressed discomfort…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and interviews for one sampled residents reviewed for special needs during dining (Resident #83), the facility failed to ensure supervision during a meal. The findings include: Resident #83's diagnoses included dysphagia and a history of pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit. Speech therapy notes dated 5/24/19 identified that Resident #83 identified patient/caregiver training: constant supervision with meals. The Speech therapy notes also identified that Resident #83 was being discharged from services, provide constant supervision at meals, no straws, aspiration precautions, and provide oral hygiene before meals. The 30 day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #83 was without cognitive impairment and required limited assistance with eating. A physician's order dated 7/2/19 directed to provide a puree, thin liquid diet, no straws, with swallowing guideline for constant/supervision, aspiration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-08-06 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of Resident Rights and interviews, the facility failed to ensure state inspection results were readily accessible to residents. The findings include: Observation of the Residents Rights posted by the elevator's indicated resident has the right to access the state survey results. On 8/2/24 at 11:15 AM interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #6) indicated all residents must ask to get off unit and some are escorted. LPN # 6 expressed if any resident knows the code, then the code is changed. On 8/2/24 at 12:14 PM interview with Registered Nurse (RN#4) indicated she has not seen a survey finding binder on the units/floors. RN#4 confirmed with RN#3 that the only copy of the survey finding binder is located on the 1st floor of the other building. Facility only copy of state survey results was posted on the first floor (next to the mail room and across from the Admissions Office) of the administrative building.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2019-08-09 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident reviewed for resident assessment (Resident #2), the facility failed to ensure an Minimum Data Set (MDS) was transmitted as required per Federal regulations. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included encephalitis and encephalomyelitis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 was without cognitive impairment and required limited assistance with personal hygiene. Additionally, the MDS was electronically signed on 9/13/18. The CMS submission report dated 10/3/18 identified the annual MDS dated [DATE] was submitted and accepted on 10/17/18, and identified record submitted late, the submission date is more than 14 days late. Review of the re-entry Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had an entry assessment completed. Review of the CMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2019-08-09 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview for the one of one sampled resident reviewed for bowel and bladder function (Resident #140) and for one of five sampled residents (Resident #172) reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), the facility failed to correctly code the MDS. The findings include: 1. Resident #140 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes and chronic kidney disease. A clinical admission observation form dated 12/28/18 indicated Resident #140 required limited assistance with toilet use and was occasionally incontinent of urine. A bladder observation form dated 12/28/18 indicated that based on assessment Resident #140 likely had mixed (urge & stress) incontinence. A bowel and bladder report dated 12/28/19 through 1/4/19 indicated Resident #140 was incontinent of bladder 10 out of 17 shifts documented on the report. An admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #140 was cognitively impaired, required extensive assist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$4,516 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $4,516 — penalty dated 2024-01-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
TOWN OF GREENWICHOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/1966
ANANTHARAJ, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/23/2026
DITEODORO, JACKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2026
KAPLAN, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2016
KELLY, PETERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2025
MARKOWITZ, BRADIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2025
MASTRONARDI, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/27/2020
MC SHERRY-MARTINO, MARGARETIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2025
PACKARD, PAMELAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2025
PATEL, NIRMALIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/23/2018
PAULMENO, STEPHANIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2025
RADULOVACKI, BRADFORDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2025
TABNER, KATEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2025
VACCARO, JUSTINEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
VASQUEZ, SASHAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/27/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$27.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-22.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$6.4M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 14%Other / private 22%

This home reported $6.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$532per resident / day
operating cost
$16,158per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$434per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Connecticut
$15,208/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,118/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075117. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next