Connecticut Baptist Homes, INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 57.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #42, 9 and 7), reviewed for accidents, for Resident #42 who had severely impaired cognition, a history of falls and was at high risk for elopement, the facility failed to monitor and accurately document the residents location in the facility every 15 minutes according to the plan of care which resulted in the resident being able to exit the facility (elope) unsupervised. These failures to properly monitor and accurately document the resident's location in the facility allowed the resident to elope the facility and resulted in a finding of Immediate Jeopardy. Additionally, for Resident #9, the facility failed to ensure the resident was transferred according to the physician's order resulting in a fall with an injury, and for Resident #7 the facility failed to ensure the staff used a gait belt during a transfer. The findings include: 1. Resident #42 was admitted to the facility with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2026-06-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the residents' medical records, facility documentation review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors. Specifically, the facility failed to administer correct medication to Resident #1 which led to harm and resulted in hospitalization with consequences. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, lymphedema, asthma, neuropathy and hypertension. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was alert and oriented with no memory recall deficits. The Resident Care Plan dated 4/7/26 identified Resident #1 had altered cardiovascular status, impaired circulation and altered respiratory status. Interventions directed to administer medications per the physician's order. A physician's order dated 5/1/26 directed Resident #1 receive the following medications at 8:30 AM everyday: Daily-Vite tablet (a multivitamin) by mouth once a day,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Actual harm · G2026-03-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, facility policies, and staff interviews, the facility failed to timely identify and respond to significant weight loss for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #3 and #26). The facility did not complete physician ordered weekly weights, did not obtain required reweights after weight loss of 5 pounds or greater per policy, failed to notify providers and the dietitian of documented significant weight loss, and did not implement or provide ordered nutritional supplements. These failures resulted in delays in assessment and intervention, allowing both residents to experience continued, preventable weight loss over multiple weeks. The findings include: 1.Resident #3's diagnosis included cerebrovascular disease, anxiety, and dementia. A Resident Care Plan dated 10/8/25 identified Resident #3 was at risk for malnutrition with interventions that included to provide gentle encouragement at mealtime, honor food preferences, and diet as ordered. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and review of facility policy for 2 of 2 medication rooms, the facility failed to ensure expired supplies were discarded and failed to ensure the medication cart was secured when staff were not in attendance. The findings include: 1. Interview and observation of the 2nd floor medication room with the Nursing Supervisor (RN #1) on [DATE] at 8:02 AM identified the following expired supplies a. 14 Covid19 AG Binox now tests ([NAME]), expired [DATE] b. Two (2) 10 milliliter (ml) syringe 22-gauge (g) x one (1) inch (in), expired [DATE] c. Six (6) three (3) ml syringe 23g x 1in, expired 8/20 d. 67 three (3) ml syringe 25g x 5/8 in, expired [DATE] e. 12 Hydrocortisone Acetate suppositories 25mg, expired [DATE]. 2. Interview and observation of the 3rd floor medication room with the Nursing Supervisor (RN #1) on [DATE] at 8:05 AM identified the following: a.One (1) 10 ml syringe 22g x one (1) in, expired [DATE] b. One (1) three (3) ml syringe 23g x 1in, expired [DATE] c. 21 three (3) ml…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, observations in the Dietary department and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure various food items were labeled with the date opened/expiration date, failed to ensure items were not stacked when wet, failed to identify plates coming from the dishwasher were clean, and failed to take freezer temperatures in 2 of 2 nourishment rooms. The findings include: On 3/23/26 at 10:24 AM, tour of the Dietary department with the Director of Dining identified the following: a. an 18 quart (qt) clear plastic bin (1/16 full) containing loose flour, an 18 qt clear plastic bin (4 qts full) containing loose breadcrumbs, and a 22 qt clear bin (12 qt full) containing loose oatmeal failed to identify the date the items were transferred into the bins from the original packaging and lacked an expiration date. The blue lid to the plastic bins of flour and breadcrumbs had an accumulation of white powdery debris and were dusty. b. a 46-ounce (oz) (almost full) plastic coated box type container of cranberry juice located in the beverage cooler was uncapped (no cap was located in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of facility policy and observations of resident bathrooms on 2 of 2 nursing units, the facility failed to ensure personal care items were properly labeled, covered, and stored according to facility policy and in a manner to provide a clean environment. The findings included: Observation on 3/25/26 at 11:33 AM and on 3/25/26 at 1:00 PM observation with Registered Nurse (RN) #1 identified the following: a. room [ROOM NUMBER]'s shared bathroom contained 2 wash basins located on the floor and 1 urinal on the back of the toilet; all items were unlabeled (as to whom they belonged to) and not covered.b. room [ROOM NUMBER]'s shared bathroom contained 1 bedpan located on the handrail near the toilet, uncovered and unlabeled (as to whom it belonged to).c. room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom contained 1 wash basin, which was labeled but located on the floor of the bathroom. c. room [ROOM NUMBER]'s shared bathroom contained 1 wash basin which was uncovered, labeled but stored on the floor and 1 bedpan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #26) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure timely notification of a significant weight loss to either the physician, Dietician or responsible party. The findings include: 1. Resident #3's diagnosis included cerebrovascular disease, anxiety, and dementia. A Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/8/25 identified Resident #3 was at risk for malnutrition with interventions that included gentle encouragement at mealtimes, honor food preferences, and diet as ordered. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 was moderately, cognitively impaired and required set up assistance with oral hygiene, upper/lower body dressing and personal hygiene. Additionally, the MDS identified Resident #3 was independent with eating, was not on a mechanically altered or therapeutic diet and weighed 134 pounds (lbs.). The Weight and Vital Summary located in the electronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and facility policy for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #9) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to complete neurological assessments after multiple unwitnessed falls, per facility policy. The findings include: Resident #9 was admitted to the facility in February 2025 with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, displaced fracture of the left femur and osteoporosis with a current pathological fracture.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #9 was severely cognitively impaired and required supervision or touching assistance for transfers and bed mobility and partial/moderate assistance for toileting.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/14/25 identified Resident #9 was at risk for falls due to multiple risk factors with interventions to toilet Resident #9 before and after meals, encourage Resident #9 to wear proper footwear and keep the resident's environment safe.a. A facility Reportable Event (RE) form dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents observed utilizing an air mattress (Resident #31), the facility failed to ensure the air mattress was set according to physician orders. Additionally, for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #45) reviewed for edema, the facility failed to complete weekly weights after readmission to the facility, per the physician order. The findings include: 1.Resident #31's diagnoses included dementia, chronic respiratory failure, and anxiety. A physician order dated 2/25/25 and currently in effect directed an air mattress for the bed, to set according to the resident's weight, and check for inflation/function every shift. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #31 was moderately cognitively impaired, dependent on staff for dressing toileting, showering and transfers. The MDS further identified Resident #31 required set up assistance for eating, was at risk for a pressure ulcer, had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #6) reviewed for positioning and mobility, the facility failed to apply a left upper extremity splint per the physician's order for a resident with a hand contracture. The findings include: Resident #6's diagnoses included unspecified dementia with agitation, spondylolysis (stress fracture or crack in bone of vertebrae of spine), and age-related osteoporosis. An Occupational Therapy (OT) evaluation dated 1/29/25 identified Resident #6 had worsening hand tremors, worsening tone and increased left hand tightness. The OT evaluation further noted Resident #6 was at risk for development of a hand contracture and skin breakdown. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified Resident #6 was severely cognitively impaired and dependent with toileting, bed mobility and transfers. The MDS indicated Resident #3 had an upper extremity impairment on one side but failed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #6) reviewed for positioning and mobility, the facility failed to complete a mechanical lift transfer with 2 staff members. The findings include: Resident #6's diagnoses included unspecified dementia with agitation, spondylolysis (stress fracture or crack in bone of vertebrae of spine), and age-related osteoporosis.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified Resident #6 was severely cognitively impaired and dependent with toileting, bed mobility and transfers. The MDS indicated Resident #3 had an upper extremity impairment on one side and a lower extremity impairment on both sides. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/15/26 identified Resident #6 had impaired mobility, was non- ambulatory and was at risk for falls. Interventions included Resident #6 required total assistance with transfers with a mechanical lift with the assist of 2 staff and had total…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-08 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — pattern
  Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews the facility failed to ensure that an accurate record of an effective training program for all staff was maintained. The findings include: The Facility assessment dated [DATE] directed that every staff member has knowledge competency in: infection control, bed rails, body mechanics, confidentiality, corporate compliance, harassment, hospitality, lock out tag out, mission and values, hazard communication, abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation; resident rights; identification of condition change; resident preferences and workplace violence. Additional knowledge competencies for all staff include dementia management, infection transmission and prevention, immunization, QAPI, and OSHA hazard communication. Hand hygiene return demonstration competencies and observed knowledge competencies for emergency response are also required. Competencies are based on current standards of practice and may include knowledge and a test, knowledge…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-08 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews reviewed for training requirements the facility failed to ensure that an accurate record of continuing nurse aide competence of no less than 12 hours per year, including dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training, was maintained. Upon the survey team's request for documentation of the completion of 12 hours of nurse aide annual in-servicing and competency training, the facility was unable to provide sufficient documentation, including completed and signed Annual Inservice Education Fair 12/11/23 through 12/29/23 packets and competency forms. Interview with the Administrator on 7/8/24 at 11:25 AM identified that the facility was unable to locate staff competency forms and tracking documentation supporting the required annual 12-hour nurse aide training. The Administrator further identified that the documentation had been missing since November of 2023, when the former Staff Development Nurse resigned. The Administrator indicated that starting next week, the facility will begin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$83,947 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $70,320 — penalty dated 2026-03-30
• $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-07-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $88K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT