Jerome Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 180 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 87 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.73 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 88.9 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.11 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.95 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.27 to 0.72 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation and policies, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who required staff assistance of one (1) when ambulating, the facility failed to utilize a gait belt when ambulating Resident #1 resulting in a fall and left lower leg fractures. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included acute respiratory failure, weakness, difficulty walking, osteoporosis and generalized osteoarthritis. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a BIMS of thirteen (13) indicating Resident #1 was alert and oriented, required extensive one (1) person assistance with toileting, limited one (1) person assistance with transfers and walking, the resident's balance when walking was not steady, and a walker and wheelchair were utilized. The Resident Care Plan dated 4/19/23 identified Resident #1 required assistance with activities of daily living. Interventions directed to ambulate with one (1) staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2020-01-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation and interview for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #89) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to appropriately utilize adaptive equipment which caused the hot liquid to spill resulting in a burn on the resident's leg, and for 1 nourishment kitchenette, the facility failed to ensure chemicals were stored in a locked cabinet and away from resident access. The findings include: 1 Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease and dementia. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #89 had severely impaired cognition and required supervision with eating. Physician's orders dated 2/1/19 directed staff to provide a [NAME] Cup (a spill proof drinking cup that is used with a straw) with all meals. A nurse's note dated 2/9/19 at 10:59 PM identified Resident #89 spilled hot coffee on his/her lap. The resident was put back to bed and the area checked. The right inner thigh was red and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #3) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to ensure the resident had a comprehensive individualized fall care plan with interventions when identified as a high risk for falls. The findings include:Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included left artificial hip joint, type II diabetes and Alzheimer's disease. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/19/25 identified Resident #3 needed assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) skills due to physical and mental impairments, recent hospitalization and deconditioning. Interventions included half-side rails for bed mobility and offer toileting upon arising, before/after meals, at hour of sleep and as neededA Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3's score was eighteen (18) indicative of being a high fall risk.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a tour of the Dietary Department, interviews and facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure foods were at appropriate temperatures for palatability. The findings included: Interview with Resident #83 on 2/3/25 at 11:17 AM identified that food was sometimes cold. Interview with Resident #28 on 2/3/25 at 11:45 AM identified that hot food was often served cold. Interview with Resident #33 on 2/3/25 at 2:51 PM identified that hot food comes cold by the time he/she receives the meal. Interview with Resident #22 on 2/3/25 at 3:12 PM identified that the food was not tasting good. An interview with the Food Services Director on 2/5/25 at 12:27 PM identified the process to ensure foods were hot included the cook taking temperatures in the kitchen and recording them in the temperature log, plates kept in a plate warmer prior to plating, and metal meal covers to keep the food temperature hot. A review of the temperature log for the week of 2/3/25 identified temperatures were taken daily for breakfast, lunch and dinner and met the food code standard. On 2/5/25 at 12:27 PM, a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of the clinical record, and facility policy for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #343) reviewed for transmission-based precautions, the facility failed to notify the social worker, physician, and psychiatrist after a suicidal ideation statement was made, per the facility policy. The findings included: Resident #343 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included homicidal ideation, sepsis, chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure, and muscle weakness. A facility consult form for psychiatry services dated 1/24/25 and signed by Resident #343 identified the reason for the referral was due to a comment made in the ICU (at the hospital and prior to facility admission) regarding homicidal ideation, knives, glass, cans were withheld in the hospital. (Psychiatry at the Long Term Care facility was not updated regarding Resident #343's psychosocial behavior in the hospital). A physician's order dated 1/24/25 directed for consultations as needed, to include, but not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
  Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents, (Resident #35), reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure a resident exposed to a communicable illness was free to exit their room when wearing appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). The findings include: Resident #35's diagnoses included ischemic cardiomyopathy, adjustment disorder, dementia, and stage 3 chronic kidney disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #35 was severely cognitively impaired, required supervision from a sit to stand position, required moderate assistance in walking 150 feet, and had no history of wandering. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) identified Resident #35 required assistance with activities of daily living. Interventions included providing staff assistance for ambulation using a wheeled walker on first and second shifts. A nurse progress note dated 1/30/25 identified Resident #35's roommate had tested positive for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents, (Resident #10), reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure that an injury of unknown source was reported to the state agency. The findings include: Resident #10's diagnoses included dementia, psychosis, restlessness, and agitation. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #10 was severely cognitively impaired, dependent with transfers and toileting, required extensive assistance of 2 staff for bed mobility, was non-ambulatory, and had no functional limitations in range of motion. The Resident Care Plan dated 11/13/24 identified Resident #10 had discoloration to the left forehead and a memory deficit with impaired judgement. Interventions included the nurse to observe transfers for 7 days and to observe skin discoloration every shift. Further interventions included providing a calm and consistent environment using a calm and gentle…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents, (Resident #10), reviewed for abuse the facility failed to ensure a complete investigation and summary were completed for a resident with an injury of unknown source. The findings include: Resident #10's diagnoses included dementia, psychosis, restlessness, and agitation. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #10 was severely cognitively impaired, was dependent with transfers and toileting, required extensive assistance of 2 staff for bed mobility, was non-ambulatory, and had no functional limitations in range of motion. The Resident Care Plan dated 11/13/24 identified Resident #10 had discoloration to the left forehead and a memory deficit with impaired judgement. Interventions included the nurse to observe transfers for 7 days and to observe skin discoloration every shift. Further interventions included providing a calm and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of the clinical records and facility policy for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #343) reviewed for transmission-based precautions, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan included statements/behaviors of homicidal ideation that were made prior to admission. The findings included: Resident #343 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included homicidal ideation, sepsis, chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure, and muscle weakness. A hospitalist progress note from the hospital (prior to Resident #343's facility admission) dated 1/20/25 at 3:36 PM identified Resident #343 was very emotional but no longer suicidal-per psychiatry held off on Lexapro (a medication indicated for depression). A facility consult form for psychiatry services dated 1/24/25 and signed by Resident #343 identified the reason for the referral was due to a comment made in the ICU (at the hospital and prior to facility admission) regarding homicidal ideation, knives, glass,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #53) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure floor mats were in place per the physician's order. The findings include: Resident #53's diagnoses included dementia, hypotension, and unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of the clinical record identified a Fall Risk Assessment Tool dated 1/20/24 indicated Resident #53 was a high risk for falls. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #53 was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance of 2 staff for transfers and bed mobility, and was dependent with toileting. The Resident Care Plan dated 2/1/25 identified falls. Interventions included fall prevention with placement of floor mats to the left and right side of the bed. A physician's order dated 2/1/25 directed to place floor mats to the left and right side of the bed every shift. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0742 — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of the clinical records and facility policy for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #343) reviewed for transmission-based precautions, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for a resident who displayed psychosocial behaviors. The findings included: Resident #343 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included homicidal ideation, sepsis, chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure, and muscle weakness. A hospitalist progress note from the hospital (prior to Resident #343's facility admission) dated 1/20/25 at 3:36 PM identified Resident #343 was very emotional but no longer suicidal-per psychiatry, held off due to being on Lexapro (a medication indicated for depression). A hospitalist progress note from the hospital (prior to Resident #343's facility admission) dated 1/22/25 at 7:28 AM identified psychiatry was consulted due to suicidal statements made by Resident #343. After further interview, it was determined Resident #343 was just…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #53) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the pharmacist failed to identify irregularities for a resident receiving an antipsychotic (psychotic disorder) medication. The findings include: Resident #53's diagnoses included dementia, adjustment disorder with depressed mood and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #53 was severely cognitively impaired and required partial to moderate assistance with bed mobility and was dependent with toileting and transfers. The MDS indicated Resident #53 was receiving an antipsychotic medication. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/5/23 identified antipsychotic medication use. Interventions included observing changes in mood and behavior, complete and thorough documentation in the nursing notes, and report behavioral changes to the Medical Doctor (MD). The physician's orders in effect from 12/5/23 through 8/15/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-12-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $456K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT