Monsignor Bojnowski Manor, INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 89 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 54.1 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for two of three residents (Resident #1, #2) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the residents were transferred in accordance with the plan of care to prevent an injury. The findings include: a. Resident #1's diagnoses included osteoarthritis, non-thrombocytopenia purpura, and dermatitis. Review of the Nurse Aide (NA) care card dated 7/23/2024 directed transfers with assist of one (1), device needed walker. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of fourteen out of fifteen, indicative of no cognitive impairment and required partial/moderate assistance with transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/24/2024 identified Resident #1 had arthritis and required assistance with transfers. Interventions directed to transfer per MD orders and use of supportive devices as recommended.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one (1) of one (1) sampled resident (Resident #1) reviewed for an allegation of involuntary seclusion, the facility failed to report a change in behavior to the physician when facility staff were unable to de-escalate Resident #1's increased agitated behaviors which resulted in facility staff placing Resident #1 in the medication room with the door closed for one and one half (1 1/2) hours. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia, insomnia, end stage renal disease, failure to thrive, and depression.The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was moderately cognitively impaired (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9), unable to make reasonable and consistent decisions regarding tasks of daily living, was dependent with all care including bed mobility and transfers, and was wheelchair bound. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/23/25 identified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
  Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one (1) of one (1) sampled resident (Resident #1) reviewed for an allegation of involuntary seclusion, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not separated from other residents or his/her room when they placed the resident in the medication room with the door closed for one and one half (1 1/2) hours when Resident #1 exhibited increased agitated behaviors. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia, insomnia, end stage renal disease, failure to thrive, and depression.The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was moderately cognitively impaired (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9), unable to make reasonable and consistent decisions regarding tasks of daily living, was dependent with all care including bed mobility and transfers, and was wheelchair bound.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/23/25 identified Resident #1 had a self-care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one (1) of one (1) sampled resident (Resident #1) reviewed for an allegation of involuntary seclusion, the facility failed to timely report the allegation of involuntary seclusion. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia, insomnia, end stage renal disease, failure to thrive, and depression.The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was moderately cognitively impaired (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9), unable to make reasonable and consistent decisions regarding tasks of daily living, was dependent with all care including bed mobility and transfers, and was wheelchair bound.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/23/25 identified Resident #1 had a self-care deficit. Interventions directed staff to assess the resident every shift, administer medications as ordered, encourage the resident to participate in care, and if Resident #1's mood was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications designated for destruction and/or return to pharmacy were secured. The findings include: Observation on 1/30/25 at 10:28 AM identified the DNS office door opened and unoccupied with a yellow basket located on top of the medication safe that contained several blister packs containing medications. The office is located on a nursing unit and opens to the resident corridor. There was one resident seated in a chair located next to the nurses' station approximately 20 feet from the opened door/office. Observation on 1/31/25 at 1:18 PM identified the DNS office door open with medications in sight. The office was unoccupied, and four residents were seated in wheelchairs outside of the unoccupied office. There was no facility staff present in the area. Observation on 2/3/25 at 12:07 PM noted the office door opened with medications in sight and unsecured. Interview on 2/3/25 at 12:39 PM with RN#2 identified discontinued and expired medications are stored in a cabinet in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-04 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, and interviews for five of five sampled residents (Resident #12, Resident #31, Resident #43, Resident #46, and Resident #49) reviewed for immunizations, the facility failed to ensure that the pneumococcal vaccine was assessed/and administered and failed to offer the influenza vaccine to residents (Resident #12 and Resident #31). The findings include: Resident #12's diagnoses included hypertension, osteoarthritis, and hypercholesterolemia. Review of the Resident Vaccine Consent form which consists of the pneumococcal vaccine consent identified Resident #12 gave the facility permission to administer the pneumococcal vaccine on 4/21/24 and on 7/7/24. Review of Resident #12's vaccination report failed a history of receiving the pneumococcal vaccine(s) or that he/she had been administered the vaccine while at the facility. Interview with the DNS (who is an Infection Preventionist (IP) and is covering for the IP) on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #52) reviewed for hospice care and had the behavior of refusing care and medications, the facility failed to ensure the resident's care plan addressed the refusals of care and medication. The findings include: Resident #52 was admitted to the facility in October of 2024. Diagnoses included vascular dementia with agitation, anxiety disorder due to known physiological condition, open wound of unspecified front wall of thorax without penetration into thoracic cavity, disorientation and insomnia. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident had intact cognition, required supervision or touching assistance with toileting, showering, and personal hygiene, independent with position changes and required supervision/touching assistance with transfers and walking. The assessment further indicated Resident #52 exhibited delusions, but did not exhibit physical or verbal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #16) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the resident was provided accurate supervision to prevent an elopement and failed to ensure staff responded to the door alarm when the resident exited the building. The findings include: Resident # 16 's diagnoses included dementia, poly-osteoarthritis, restlessness and agitation. The elopement evaluation dated 6/24/24 identified Resident #16 was at risk for elopement. A physician's order dated 6/24/24 identified Resident #16 wander guard on right wrist and check bracelet application every shift, check function once a shift. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #16 had severe cognitive impairment, required supervision with transfers and ambulation and had a wander guard (monitoring device that triggers an alarm) in place. The care plan dated 9/13/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the hand hygiene procedures were followed by staff involved in direct resident contact. The findings include: Continuous observations of medication administration on 1/30/25 at 9:21 AM identified LPN#5 took Resident #34's blood pressure and then exited the room without performing hand hygiene. LPN #5 then preceded to the medication cart, prepared Resident #34's medications, and re-entered the resident's room and administered the medications. LPN#5 spoon fed the resident a few medications at a time and assisted the resident with drinking the water. LPN#5 then returned to the med cart and prepared an additional medication that Resident #34 had requested. It was noted that Resident #34 had a new complaint of rash to bilateral arms. At 9:45 AM, LPN#5 exited Resident #34's room, retrieved the blood pressure machine (which had been wiped down by the NA) and entered Resident 50's room and obtained a blood pressure. LPN#5 exited the room without performing hand hygiene, and did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for one of two sampled residents (Resident #35) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to ensure medication was administered as ordered. The findings include: Resident #35's diagnoses included epilepsy, dementia and anxiety. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #35 was moderately cognitively impaired, had no behaviors, required max assistance for bed mobility, dressing, and hygiene, was dependent for transfers, utilized a mechanical lift and utilized a wheelchair for mobility. The physician's orders for June/July 2024 (original order dated 10/5/22) directed to administer Clobazam (benzodiazepine/used to treat seizures) 10mg orally once a day in the evening. The Controlled Substance Disposition Record dated 6/14/24 indicated a 30-day supply (30 tabs) of Clobazam 10mg tablets were delivered to the facility on 6/14/24. The disposition record identified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolated
  Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and agency staff file review for three of three agency NAs (NA #1, 2 and 3), the facility failed to ensure agency staff received facility orientation to include emergency procedures and abuse training prior to working in the facility. The findings include: A. Agency NA #1 file review identified NA #1 worked at the facility on 12/28/2024 during the 3 to 11 PM shift. File review for NA #1 failed to identify a general orientation to include facility emergency procedures and abuse training. B. Agency NA #2 file review identified NA #2 worked at the facility on 9/2/2023 during the 3 to 11 PM shift. File review for NA #2 failed to identify a general orientation to include facility emergency procedures and abuse training. C. Agency NA #3 file review identified NA #3 worked at the facility on 9/2/2023 during the 3 to 11 PM shift. File review for NA #3 failed to identify a general orientation to include facility emergency procedures and abuse training. Interview, facility documentation review and facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$21,991 in federal fines across 5 penalties.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-01-16
• $3,176 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
• $2,823 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
• $2,470 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
• $5,244 — penalty dated 2023-10-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $15K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT