Grimes Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 213 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 76.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.86 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 92.6 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.11 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.74 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.34 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to protect Resident #7 from verbal abuse and intimidation by Resident #6 after Resident #6 (who resides on a different unit), sat outside Resident #7's room and was verbally aggressive, intimidating and used sexually explicit profanity towards Resident #7. The findings include: a. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with agitation, adjustment disorder, and anxiety disorder.The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 had intact cognition, was independent with transfers and used a walker and a wheelchair for mobility. The care plan dated 8/14/25 identified Resident #6 was at risk for behavior issues related to history of mental illness and cognitive deficits. Interventions included to monitor behavior episodes, attempt to determine the underlying cause, and document the behavior and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to immediately report when Resident #6 (who resides on a different unit), sat outside Resident #7's room and was verbally aggressive, intimidating and used sexually explicit profanity towards Resident #7. The findings include:a. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with agitation, adjustment disorder, and anxiety disorder.The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 had intact cognition. The care plan dated 8/14/25 identified Resident #6 was at risk for behavior issues related to history of mental illness and cognitive deficits. Interventions included to monitor behavior episodes, attempt to determine the underlying cause, and document the behavior and potential causes. Review of the census list identified Resident #6 resided on the 3rd floor unit on 9/7/25.A nurse's note dated 9/7/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation and protect Resident #7 from further potential abuse by Resident #6 after Resident #6 (who resides on a different unit), sat outside Resident #7's room and was verbally aggressive, intimidating and used sexually explicit profanity towards Resident #7. The findings include:a. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with agitation, adjustment disorder, and anxiety disorder.The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 had intact cognition, was independent with transfers and used a walker and a wheelchair for mobility. The care plan dated 8/14/25 identified Resident #6 was at risk for behavior issues related to history of mental illness and cognitive deficits. Interventions included to monitor behavior episodes, attempt to determine the underlying cause, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from the PASARR level II determination into the resident assessment and care plan for a resident with a history of harm directed behaviors and substance abuse. The findings include:Resident #7 was admitted to the facility in November 2024 with diagnoses that included borderline personality disorder, anxiety disorder, and bipolar disorder. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #7 had intact cognition, was always continent of bowel and bladder, required set up with bathing, and was independent with toileting and transfers. The MDS further identified Resident #7 had active diagnosis that included bipolar disorder and psychotic disorder and required anti-psychotic medication daily. The MDS failed to identify the resident had a serious mental illness…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policies, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #63) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reflective of interventions to address pressure ulcers including a Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) and for 1 of 3 resident (Resident #38) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reflective of interventions related to congestive heart failure (CHF). The findings include: Resident #38 was admitted to the facility in January 2026 with diagnoses that included bilateral humerus fractures, atrial fibrillation, and chronic diastolic congestive heart failure. The physician's orders dated 1/15/26 directed Congestive Heart Failure protocol as follows. Check oxygen saturation every shift. Obtain daily weights at 6:30 AM and notify the MD/APRN of weight gain of 3 lbs. or more in one day or 5 lbs. in a week. Monitor edema to the abdomen, legs, ankles, and feet every shift. Monitor fatigue every shift. Monitor for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interview for 1 resident (Resident #2) reviewed for death, the facility failed to utilize a hard surface (backboard) beneath the resident while performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) according to the American Heart Association current guidelines. The findings include:Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in 6/2025 with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of glottis (region of the larynx or voice box containing vocal cords) and history of acute and chronic respiratory failure with a tracheostomy placement.The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 was cognitively intact, independent with bed mobility, transfers and ambulation without assistance and received tracheostomy care.The care plan dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had a potential for altered respiratory status secondary to having a tracheostomy (trach) and history of respiratory failure. Interventions included monitoring…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interview for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #38) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure that daily weights were obtained and documented per the physician's order. The findings include:Resident #38 was admitted to the facility in January 2026 with diagnoses that included bilateral humerus fractures, atrial fibrillation, and chronic diastolic congestive heart failure. The physician's order dated 1/15/26 directed to obtain daily weights at 6:30 AM and notify the MD/APRN of weight gain of 3 lbs. or more in one day or 5 lbs. in a week.The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #38 had severely impaired cognition, was frequently incontinent of bowel, occasionally incontinent of bladder and was dependent on facility staff to assist with eating, bathing, and toileting.Review of the care plan failed to identify interventions related to congestive heart failure or the need for daily weights. Review of the clinical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #11) reviewed for range of motion, the facility failed to ensure an adaptive device for limited mobility of the right hand was applied according to physician's orders. The findings include.Resident #11 was admitted to the facility in 10/2024 with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction and disorders of the automatic nervous system.The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #11 was severely cognitively impaired, had limited range of motion in the upper and lower extremities and required two person assist for bed mobility, transfers, and dressing.The care plan dated 1/3/26 identified Resident #11 required ADL assistance related to decreased mobility with cognitive deficits. Interventions included providing supportive care, assistance with mobility as needed and PT/OT referral, evaluation and treatment as ordered.A physician's order dated 1/4/26 (original date 4/11/25)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #8) reviewed for antibiotic use, the facility failed to ensure the resident with an indwelling medical device and chronic wound was placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), and for the only sampled resident (Resident #16) reviewed for dialysis, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an indwelling medical device was placed on EBP.1. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on 12/2025 with diagnoses that included a non-pressure chronic ulcer of the left and right heel and left and right midfoot with bone involvement.A physician's order dated 12/26/25 directed to change the dressing to the right foot wound daily, every shift, and to change the wound vac (125 mmHg) dressing to the left foot every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. The physician's orders identified that Resident #8 had a single lumen Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) to the right upper chest with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for the plan of care , the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan with appropriate interventions was implemented for a resident at risk for bruising. The findings include: Resident #1 had diagnoses that included Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia, myeloproliferative disease ( blood disorders) , lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (a type of cancer), anemia, amyloidosis, post-traumatic stress disorder, delirium, and depressive disorder. Review of the nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] completed by RN #6 identified Resident #1 had a fading bruise to the left side of forehead, bruising to both arms, and dark purple discoloration to the peri area extending to the inner buttocks. The care plan dated 10/19/24 identified Resident #1 at risk for impaired skin integrity related to decreased mobility and incontinence. Interventions directed preventative treatments…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in CT