No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Villa Maria Nursing And Rehabilitation Community

20 Babcock Avenue, Plainfield, CT 06374 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 56 certified beds · (860) 564-3387 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 20261 immediate-jeopardy citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$36,384 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $36,384 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-30)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
558 Norwich Rd · (860) 564-4054 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
10 Lathrop Rd · (860) 564-2111 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
ALDI0.2 mi
 
Park
8 Community Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.1%18.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.1%6.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.9%22.3%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.4%3.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened27.8%16.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.2%17.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.1%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.7%4.0%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.9%24.7%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table27.5%17.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication7.6%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.7%69.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.2%24.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.6%10.7%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.532.061.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.981.461.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.1%CMS range 48.6–69.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 7.2–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge44.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 4.7–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.98
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.31
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.52
RN hoursweekends
54.8%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 56 beds and averages 57.2 residents a day — about 102% occupied, or roughly -1 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-10)
29
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-20)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

63 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews for one sampled resident who received an anticoagulant (blood thinner, increases risk for bleeding) medication (Resident ID #1) the facility failed to obtain an order to discontinue the anticoagulant medication prior to a dental procedure where twenty-three (23) teeth extracted. Subsequently Resident #1 continued to receive the anticoagulant medication, experienced bleeding requiring sutures, had a change in condition, was sent to the hospital where he/she suffered cardiac arrest and expired. This resulted in a finding of Immediate Jeopardy. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included paroxysmal atrial tachycardia (atrial arrythmia), hypertension, and anxiety. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was alert and oriented and was receiving an anticoagulant. The Resident Care Plan dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was on anticoagulant therapy due to arial fibrillation with a goal to minimize the risk of complications and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation/policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pressure injuries, the facility failed to ensure implementation of physician-ordered interventions, ongoing skin monitoring, and timely identification and reporting of changes in skin condition for a resident at very high risk for pressure injury development, resulting in the development of a facility-acquired, medical device-related Stage IV pressure injury to the right ankle. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included fracture of the right femur and dementia. Resident #1 had a Power of Attorney for care. The Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a pressure injury to the sacrum and right Achilles bruising.A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) interview dated 1/2/26 identified Resident #1 scored four (4) indicative of severe cognitive impairment.Physician's orders dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who was status post fracture of the right lower leg and required a knee brace and an assistive device for standing, the facility failed to apply the hinged knee brace to the right leg prior to standing the resident which caused the resident's leg to buckle resulting in a fall and the resident sustained an acute fracture of the proximal tibia. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia, fracture lower end of right femur, osteoarthritis of the right knee, and generalized weakness. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four (4) indicating short and long-term memory recall deficits and was dependent on staff for dressing, showers, and transfers. The Resident Care Plan dated 10/31/24 identified Resident #1 had a self-care deficit and was at risk for falls…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2021-08-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #2) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed provide care and services to address a significant ongoing weight loss. The findings included: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke, kidney cancer, disorder of thyroid. A Nutrition Risk assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 has had no significant weight change, had a current food intake of 50 - 75%, required no therapeutic nutritional supplements, and had no swallowing difficulties. Physician's order dated 2/12/21 directed to weigh Resident #2 weekly on Mondays, provide a regular house diet with regular consistency, and thin liquids. Review of the Weights and Vitals Summary dated 2/14/21 identified Resident #2 weighed 137 lbs. A Dietary Note dated 2/25/21 identified Resident #2 was eating a regular diet well and maintaining weight.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, facility documentation/policies, and interviews, for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #4) reviewed for notification of change, the facility failed to notify the resident representative (Person #1) of a significant change in status when Resident #4 attempted to exit the facility and a Wanderguard (an electronic monitoring device that alerts staff when at risk individuals approach or attempt to exit secured areas) was applied to the right wrist. The failure to notify Person #1 resulted in Resident #4's representative being unaware of the change in condition and unable to participate in care decisions. The findings include:Resident #4's diagnoses included vascular dementia with mood disturbances and chronic lymphocytic leukemia of B cell in relapse.The Clinical admission by RN #3 dated 5/14/26 at 9:08 PM identified Resident #4 was transported to the facility by Person #1, who left after arrival. Resident #4 was admitted on hospice services, was alert to person only, was confused, required cues, wandered without a goal, was pleasant, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews, for two (2) of five (5) sampled residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for allegations of abuse, the facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was free from abuse when Resident #1 entered Resident #2's room and touched Resident #2 inappropriately. The findings include:1.Resident #2's diagnoses included affective mood disorders, Parkinson's disease, depression, and anxiety.The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had intact cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15), required partial assistance for bed mobility and transfers, did not ambulate, and did not exhibit behaviors.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 5/7/26 identified Resident #2 had a mood problem related to depression and anxiety and utilized psychotropic medications. Interventions directed staff to encourage Resident #2 to express feelings, provide a calm and quiet atmosphere when restless or anxious,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-15 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews, for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #4) reviewed for elopement risk, the facility failed to ensure Resident #4 was free from restraint. After a single, easily redirected attempt to exit the facility, staff applied a Wanderguard without obtaining prior consent from the responsible party and without attempting less restrictive interventions, despite no further documented wandering or exit seeking behaviors. This resulted in unnecessary restriction of Resident #4's freedom of movement. The findings include:Resident #4's diagnoses included vascular dementia with mood disturbances and chronic lymphocytic leukemia of B cell in relapse.The Clinical admission by RN #3 dated 5/14/26 at 9:08 PM identified Resident #4 was transported to the facility by the responsible party (Person #1), who left after arrival. Resident #4 was admitted on hospice services, was alert to person only, was confused, required cues, wandered without a goal, was pleasant, and had no impairments to the upper or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, for two (2) of five (5) sampled residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for allegations of abuse, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation of sexual abuse. Specifically, the facility did not interview residents who had the potential to be affected, despite the alleged perpetrator self propelling throughout the building in a wheelchair. The findings include:1.Resident #2's diagnoses included affective mood disorders, Parkinson's disease, depression, and anxiety.The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had intact cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15), required partial assistance for bed mobility and transfers, and did not ambulate. No behaviors were identified.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 5/7/26 identified Resident #2 had a mood problem related to depression and anxiety and utilized psychotropic medications.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #4) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate to include functional/mobility status, care provided and meal percentages consumed. The findings include:Resident #4's diagnoses included vascular dementia with mood disturbances and chronic lymphocytic leukemia of b-cell in relapse (a slow growing blood cancer that has returned/progressed after a period of improvement following initial treatment). The Clinical admission dated 5/14/26 at 9:08 PM identified Resident #4 was transported to the facility by a family member (Person #1) who left when Resident #4 entered the facility. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on hospice and was alert to person only, was confused, required cues, was pleasant, had no impairments to the upper of lower extremities and had a steady gait. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 5/15/26 identified Resident #4 has an ADL self-care performance deficit as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, facility policies, and interviews for food and nutrition services, the facility failed to ensure food and drink items were labeled, expired food items were disposed of, and the Dining Room steam cart was clean and sanitary. Findings include:Tour of the facility on 5/11/26 at 10:45 identified the following:The Nourishment Room freezer contained expired ice pops, an unidentified frozen item in a cup, pancakes, and a water bottle and the Nourishment Room refrigerator contained expired yogurt cups and marshmallows, an unlabeled opened supplement drink, and multiple unlabeled supplements. The Nourishment Room supplement refrigerator contained expired supplemental ice creams and shakes. The Dining Room contained bread, individually packaged rolls, waffles, and potato chips which were opened and unlabeled and crescent rolls which had expired.Observation with the Director of Food service identified one compartment of the base of the steam table which was dirty and the Director of Food service identified it may have been caused by a spill of gravy.An interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, facility policies, and interviews for pharmacy services, the facility failed to ensure accurate reconciliation of all controlled substances when staff did not document an accurate inventory of controlled substances at the change of shift. The findings include:Review of the facility Count Sheet Narcotics and Sedatives form for three (3) units for March 2026 identified there were a combined total of 279 shifts that controlled medications should have been counted. Of those 279 shifts, the clinical staff failed to document the control substance count 54 times. Review of the facility Count Sheet Narcotics and Sedative form for three (3) units for April 2026 identified there were a combined total of 270 shifts that controlled medications should have been counted. Of those 270 shifts, the clinical staff failed to document the control substance count 67 times. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 5/11/26 at 3:00 PM identified it was the licensed nurse's responsibility to complete the Count Sheet Narcotics and Sedative form at the change of every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation/policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pressure injuries, the facility failed to ensure timely notification of the physician and registered nurse regarding a significant change in skin condition for a resident at very high risk for pressure injury development, including failure to report observed bruising and soft tissue changes under a medical device (right leg brace). This failure resulted in a delay in medical evaluation and intervention, and the subsequent development of a facility-acquired, medical device-related Stage IV pressure injury to the right ankle. The findings include:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included fracture of the right femur and dementia. Resident #1 had a Power of Attorney for care. The Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a pressure injury to the sacrum and right Achilles bruising.A Brief Interview for Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #25, Resident #31, Resident #39) reviewed for care plans, the facility failed to review and revise the Resident Care Plan (RCP) and for Resident #31 failed to conduct Resident Care Plan Conferences per the requirement. The findings include: 1. Resident #25's diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the head, face, and neck, chronic heart failure, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #25 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment, was dependent with personal hygiene and chair/bed-to-chair transfers and required maximal assistance in rolling left and right. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/12/2024 identified Resident #25 had a problem with anxiety and agitation. Interventions included an assist of 2 at all times due to accusatory behavior, allow time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and a temperature test, the facility failed to ensure that food was palatable and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. The findings included: Interview with Resident #4 on 6/05/2025 at 10:25 AM identified the food was cold and sometimes the meat was raw. Interview with Resident #59 on 6/4/2025 at 10:30 AM identified there was often cold toast, coffee, and eggs. Interview with Resident #47 on 6/4/2025 at 12:24 PM identified he is hungry even after eating and doesn't get enough food served at meals. Interview with Resident #8 on 6/6/2025 at 12:55 PM identified that the facility serves food that is cold. On 6/10/2025 at 11:26 AM a temperature check of the tray line was performed with the Dietary Director using the kitchen's calibrated thermometer as the first meal cart was being plated. The temperature of the potatoes was 168.1 degrees Fahrenheit (*F), chicken nuggets were 166.0 *F, cauliflower was 169.3 *F, and the coleslaw was 57.1 *F. Interview and observation with the Dietary Director on 6/10/2025 at 11:26 AM identified the temperature of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 49 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #212) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to notify the physician for a change in condition and for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #213) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to notify the physician when the medication was not available for administration. The findings include: 1. Resident #212 was admitted to the facility in November 2024 with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease, diabetes, hypertension, and cerebral infarction (death of brain tissue) without residual deficits. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #212 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment, required substantial/maximum assistance for personal hygiene, was dependent on bed to chair transfers, and was receiving hemolytic treatment. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) in effect for the month of May of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of clinical records, facility documentation, and facility policy for 1 of 3 residents, (Resident #25) reviewed for dignity, and for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #32 and #39) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the State Agency. The findings include: 1. Resident #25's diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the head, face, and neck, chronic heart failure, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #25 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment, was dependent with personal hygiene and chair/bed-to-chair transfers and required maximal assistance in rolling left and right. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/12/2024 identified Resident #25 had a problem with anxiety and agitation. Interventions included an assist of 2 at all times due to accusatory behavior, allow time to communicate effectively, and re-offer behavioral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of clinical records, facility documentation, and facility policy for 1 of 3 residents, (Resident #25) reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of sexual abuse and failed to remove the staff member from the schedule following the allegation. The findings include: Resident #25's diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the head, face, and neck, congestive heart failure, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #25 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment, was dependent with personal hygiene and chair/bed-to-chair transfers and required maximal assistance in rolling left and right. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/12/2024 identified Resident #25 had a problem with anxiety and agitation. Interventions included an assist of 2 at all times due to accusatory behavior, allow time to communicate effectively, and re-offer behavioral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 5 residents, (Resident #13) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure that a resident with obvious deformities of the wrist and hip was not moved according to standards of practice and for the only sampled resident (Resident #212) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to complete a Registered Nurse (RN) assessment for change in condition according to standards of practice. The findings include: 1. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in November of 2024 with diagnoses that included dementia, depression, heart failure and hypertension. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment and required moderate assistance for personal hygiene and was independent for bed mobility and transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 2/27/2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #212) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to ensure appropriate communication with the hemolytic treatment center. The findings include: Resident #212's diagnosis included end stage renal disease, diabetes, hypertension, and cerebral infarction (death of brain tissue) without residual deficits. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #212 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment, required substantial/maximum assistance for personal hygiene, was dependent on bed to chair transfers, and was receiving hemolytic treatment. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) in effect for the month of May of 2025 identified Resident #212 was on hemolytic treatment due to end stage renal failure. Interventions included administer/hold, monitor effectiveness of medications as ordered, check complete hemolytic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical records, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for infection control practices, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene during wound care. The findings include: Resident #9's diagnoses included cellulitis of lower left limb, non-pressure chronic ulcer of left lower leg, and congenital deformities of feet. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #9 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment and was dependent for chair/bed to chair transfer and required partial/moderate assistance for turning/repositioning in bed. The Resident Care Plan dated 5/14/2025 identified Resident #9 had DTIs (deep tissue injuries) to bilateral heels. Interventions included providing wound care treatment as ordered, soft boots to be worn at all times while in bed, and off load heels in bed at all times with pillows or bunny boots. A physician's order dated 5/20/2025 directed nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #28, Resident #48, Resident #58) reviewed for immunizations, the facility failed to identify Covid 19 vaccination status, offer the Covid 19 vaccination (or provide information where to obtain), and failed to educate the resident on the risks and benefits of Covid 19 vaccinations. The findings include: 1. Resident #28's diagnoses included cellulitis, lymphedema, and diabetes. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #28 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 identifying cognitively intact and required set-up assistance with personal hygiene, substantial maximum assistance with dressing, and bed mobility. The Covid 19 immunization status was noted to not be up to date. The Resident Care Plan dated 5/6/2025 failed to reflect the Covid 19 vaccination status or that education provided for vaccination. Review of the electronic health record for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #1) who was reviewed for anticoagulation management, the facility failed to identify the need to evaluate the anticoagulation use prior to a scheduled procedure where twenty-three (23) teeth were extracted, failed to complete an RN assessment after Resident #1 had a change in condition, labored breathing and slight confusion post extraction procedure, failed to administer an antibiotic pre procedure as ordered, held the blood thinner medication for one dose without an order and failed to contact the physician that the dose was held. Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital where Resident #1 expired after suffering cardiac arrest. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included paroxysmal atrial tachycardia (atrial arrythmia) hypertension, adult failure to thrive and anxiety. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was alert and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed ensure the resident was free from mistreatment. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), schizoaffective disorder (psychiatric/mood disorder), anxiety, and depression. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was alert and oriented, and was independent for mobility with a walker. A Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/19/2023 identified Resident #1 had a behavioral focus due to verbal aggression, accusatory of staff, agitation and intrusive behaviors and trauma informed due to post traumatic stress syndrome (PTSD). The RCP directed to speak softly and clearly when communicating, to provide options to encourage a sense of control and a consistent assignment as Resident #1 has difficulty trusting others and showing positive emotion. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility policy and interviews for 7 of 7 sampled residents (Residents #3, #14, #26, #27, #28, #31 and #51), reviewed for Advanced Directives, the facility failed to establish advanced directives related to code status and other life sustaining treatments with newly admitted and readmitted residents. The findings included: 1. Resident #3's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction, alcohol abuse and post-traumatic stress disorder. The hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 was admitted to the hospital with Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and had code status of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) and Do Not Intubate (DNI). The physician's order dated [DATE] identified the resident's code status was DNR/DNI, Registered Nurse (RN) may pronounce, and death was anticipated secondary to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The physician examination form without the resident's name written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of the kitchen, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to complete dishwashing log sheets, attend to elevated refrigerator temperatures, properly label prepared foods, and dispose of expired foods and damaged cans of food. The findings included: During a kitchen tour with the Dietary Manager on 9/13/23 from 9:00 AM to 10:30 AM identified the following: 1. Missed dishwashing temperature entries in August 2023 as follows: ten missed breakfast wash and rinse entries, eleven missed lunch wash and rinse entries, ten missed dinner wash and eleven missed rinse entries. Interview with the Culinary Director on 9/20/23 at 1:05 PM identified the dishwashing log sheet are completed after each time the dishwasher was used and the cook was responsible for the breakfast temperature entries and the kitchen aide was responsible for the lunch and dinner temperature entries. 2.a. Elevated milk refrigerator temperatures, ranging from 42 to 46 degrees, from September 5, 2023, through September 11, 2023. b. Elevated three door refrigerator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #26 and Resident #359) who were reviewed for nutrition and pressure ulcers, the facility failed to inform the physician of a significant weight loss and change in a wound. The findings include: 1. Resident #359 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included non-Hodgkin lymphoma (cancer), multiple sclerosis and stroke. Resident #359 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a planned admission and discharged from the facility on 5/5/23. Review of the hospital discharge summary and W10 dated 4/9/23 identified Resident #359 had an abdominal fissure moisture associated skin damage that originated on 3/9/23 that was open to air, a stage two (2) coccyx pressure injury that originated on 3/9/23 that was being treated with triad and foam and a sacral spine moisture associated skin damage that originated on 3/30/23 that was being treated with triad. It further recommended a low air loss bed, turns every two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, inteviews and facility policy for of 2 of the 7 residents observed during medication administration the facility failed to ensure staff maintained the right to privacy of the residents when failed to knock on the door prior to entrance to a room. The findings included: On 9/13/2023 at 9:13 AM observation of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #3) during medication pass identified LPN # 3 bringing resident from the main dining area to the shared bedroom, entered a room without first knocking, surveyor followed behind and knocked on door prior to entering. On 9/13/2023 at 9:28 AM LPN #3 was observed preparing medications for a resident and entered the resident's room approaching the resident while the surveyor knocked on the door and entered. LPN #3 then indicated he/she should have knocked prior to entry. After the medication administration was completed for the resident,LPN # 3 at 9:28 AM indicated that she had not knocked on the resident's doors prior to entering the rooms as he/she was concentrating on the task at hand and further indicated that in the future she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, policy review and interviews for the 3 of 3 sampled residents for ( Resident # 22), reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to identify a decline in ADL and for 1 resident ( Resident # 38). reviewed for change in condition, the facility failed to complete a significant change assessment timely and for (Resident #212) reviewed for hospice, the facility failed to accurately identify, Resident #212 had received hospice care on 2 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments.The findings included: 1. Resident #22 's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, bipolar depression, and diabetes mellitus. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #22 as moderately cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance, assist of 2 for bed mobility, toileting, and transfers. A physician's order dated 8/29/23, directed to provide assistance of 2 with adaptive equipment (rolling walker, gait belt) when transferring, toileting and ambulating. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of policy and staff interviews for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #17) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to develop a baseline care timely for a resident using a specialized respiratory device was care planned regarding the device. The findings include: Resident #17's diagnosis included sleep apnea, morbid obesity, diabetes mellitus. The care plan dated 8/29/2023 indicated Resident #17 had hypertension. Interventions included providing medications as ordered, monitoring for edema or signs and symptoms of hypertension. The admission-5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #17 was cognitively intact and BiPAP/CPAP before coming into the facility and after admission to the facility. On 9/15/2023 at 1:08 PM an interview and observation with RN #2 identified a CPAP device in Resident #17's room. However, RN#2 further indicated she completed Resident #17's admission, and the device was not present and indicated there was no physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policy and staff interviews 1 of three 3 residents (Resident #359), reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to create and implement a plan of care for a resident with identified to be at risk fro pressure ulcers and for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #17) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to ensure that a resident using a specialized respiratory device was care planned regarding the device and The findings included: 1. Resident #359 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included non-Hodgkin lymphoma (cancer), multiple sclerosis and stroke. Resident #359 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a planned admission and discharged from the facility on 5/5/23. Review of the hospital discharge summary and W10 dated 4/9/23 identified Resident #359 had a stage two (2) coccyx pressure injury that originated on 3/9/23 that was being treated with triad and foam and a sacral spine moisture associated skin damage that originated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility policy and interviews for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (Resident #10), the facility failed to ensure a resident's shower schedule was care planned. The findings include: Resident #10's diagnosis included anxiety, depressive disorder, and muscle weakness. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #10's cognitive status was severely impaired and required total dependence of one staff member for bathing. The care plan dated 7/11/2023 indicated Resident #10 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to dementia and fatigue. Interventions that included in part to check and trim nails with bathing and as needed. An interview and record review on 9/19/2023 at 8:55 AM with NA#3 who reviewed the shower list for the unit indicated Resident #10's shower days were on second shift every Sunday and Thursday. On 9/19/2023 at 9:00 AM an interview and record review with RN #2 indicated there was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, review of policy and interviews for 2 of 3 residents (Resident # 56) reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to notify another state agency the resident left the facility Against Medical Advice and for ( Resident # 57), the facility failed to complete a recapitulation of the resident stay and retain discharge paperwork and instructions provided at discharge of a resident. The findings included: 1. Resident #56's diagnosis included diabetes mellitus, pain in right knee, asthma, heart disease and major depression. The physician's order dated 6/20/2023 directed to provide the assistance of one for Activities of Daily Living (ADL), use a gait belt while walking with a walker with the assistance of one, transfer with the assistance of 2 and toilet with the assistance of 1 person. The care plan dated 6/20/2023 indicated Resident #56 was at risk for falls or fall related injury related to history of falls prior to admission and knee pain with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews, review of facility policy, and interviews 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #26) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to implement care plan as directed to assist the resident as needed in performing ADL and for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #27) reviewed for dining and who required supervision with meals, the facility failed to assist the resident. The findings included: 1.Resident #26's diagnoses included unspecified dementia, dysphagia, and gastro-esophageal disease. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 26 was severely cognitively impaired and required oversight, encouragement or cueing with eating. The Resident Care Plan dated 8/8/23 identified a nutritional or potential nutritional problem and an activities of daily living self-care performance deficit. Interventions directed to allow adequate time to eat, and observe/document as indicated: meal consumption, amount of assistance needed with meal, and tolerance to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for Activities of daily living (Resident #10), the facility failed to consistently provide showers to the resident per plan of care and 1 of 5 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (Resident #22), the facility failed to ensure staff documented showers as given, trimmed, and kept nails free from debris. The findings included: 1. Resident #10's diagnosis included anxiety, depressive disorder, and muscle weakness. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #10's cognitive status as severely impaired and noted the resident required total dependence of one staff member for bathing. Although Resident #10's care plan was requested it was not provided. The facility did provide a care plan meeting sign sheet dated 7/11/2023. An interview and review of the facility's shower day list on 9/19/2023 at 8:55 AM with Nurse Aide (NA#3) identified Resident #10's shower days were on second shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation , review of the clinical record and interviews for 1of 4 residents who were reviewed during medication administration, the facility failed to administer the correct dose of medication. The findings included: Resident # 40's diagnoses included chronic pain syndrome, unspecified osteoarthritis, and displaced fracture of base of neck of right femur. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #40 as cognitively intact and required limited assistance with eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The Resident Care Plan dated 7/27/23 identified pain or potential for pain related to recent fall resulting in left hip fracture. Interventions directed to pain management consult/follow-up per order and/or recommendations. A physician's order dated 8/8/23 directed Acetaminophen 500mg every 12 hours as needed for pain. Observations on 9/15/23 at 6:30 AM identified Resident #40 asking LPN #4 to provide medication for pain relief. LPN #4 proceeded to his/her medication cart,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #26) who was reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to weigh the resident in accordance with facility policy. The findings include: Resident #26's diagnoses included unspecified dementia, dysphagia, and gastro-esophageal disease. A physician's order dated 7/7/2023 directed to weekly weights x 4 weeks, then monthly. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 26 was severely cognitively impaired and required oversight, encouragement or cueing with eating. The Resident Care Plan dated 8/8/23 identified a nutritional or potential nutritional problem and an activities of daily living self-care performance deficit. Interventions directed to allow adequate time to eat, and observe/document as indicated: meal consumption, amount of assistance needed with meal, and tolerance to diet/fluids. Interview and clinical record review with the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) on 9/19/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility Intravenous (IV) Therapy Program, review of facility documentation, facility policy and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide evidence that licensed nurses had received IV certification training, specific IV in-services and competencies to care for residents receiving IV therapy. The findings included: A review of the facility IV therapy program on 9/18/23 at 10:30 AM identified Resident #17 had a physician order dated 8/29/23 directing if Mediport (implanted venous access port to administer medications) not accessed, to flush every month with 20 ml Normal Saline then flush with 5 ml 100/ml Heparin. a. Review of the IV therapy program with RN #1 Director of Clinical Operations on 9/18/23 at 10:48 AM failed to provide documentation licensed nurses responsible for managing residents requiring IV therapy participated in IV class and received certificates of completion. The facility was able to provide two (2) licensed nurses IV certificates out of seventeen (17) licensed nurses currently employed by the facility. Further interview with RN #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #14) reviewed for Activities, the facility failed to enter a physician's order for oxygen and for 1 of 1 ( Resident # 17), reviewed for respiratory, the facility failed to ensure a complete physician's order for the utilization of the device. The findings included: 1. Resident #14's diagnoses included acute diastolic heart failure, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and Multiple Sclerosis. The Resident Care Plan dated 7/27/23 identified oxygen therapy related to congestive heart failure. Interventions directed to administer oxygen and ordered and monitor for respiratory distress. The Five-Day Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #14 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, personal hygiene, and toileting. A physician's order dated 8/11/23 directed oxygen at (amount not blank) liters via nasal cannula as needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility policy and interviews for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #13 and #27), reviewed for physician's orders, the facility failed to ensure orders were signed timely. The findings included: 1. Resident #13's diagnosis included urinary tract infection, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, and traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness. The admission 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #13 was cognitively intact. The care plan dated 8/16/2023 indicted Resident #13 had an impaired thought process related to dementia and subdural hematoma with interventions including in part to explain all care prior to provision, make eye contact with resident when speaking, anticipate needs, to orient and validate. The care plan further indicated the need for discharge planning with interventions to discuss the discharge planning process with the resident, family or representative. A nursing progress note dated 8/17/23 at 5:17…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #23) who was screened on the initial tour of the facility, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were signed timely per facility policy. The findings included: Resident # 23's diagnoses included chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure, dementia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #23 required extensive assistance with bed mobility and total dependence with toilet use. Review of clinical records identified unsigned physician's orders from 11/20/22 through 9/15/2023. Interview with the Director of Nursing Services on 9/14/23 at 1:12 PM identified physician's orders for Resident #23 had not been reviewed since 11/20/22 in the electronic medical record, the expectation is that orders be reviewed/signed off monthly. The DNS indicated the physicians have been trained in how to sign orders electronically.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility staff education and interview, the facility failed to ensure mandatory staffing was completed to meet the 12-hour annual requirement. The findings include: Interview on 9/18/23 at 11:57 AM with RN #3 identified she had been in the staff educator role for 2 months, new hires were being provided orientation education on several topics, however, the topics did not include the mandatory training on specific resident needs (i.e. hospice care, changes in condition, respiratory ventilation, dialysis, medication side effects or pain) or communication (team work, listening skills, eye level communication). She further indicated that she would investigate further and speak with the Director of Clinical Operations regarding staff previously hired and trained. Interview on 9/18/23 at 1:20 PM with Director of Clinical Operations identified the facility had no other Staff Education information to provide, other than what the staff educator had provided (new hire orientations). Interview on 9/18/23 at 2:40 PM with the staff educator, RN #3 identified that she could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations during medication administration, review of policy and interview, the facility failed to dispose of an expired bottle of multi-vitamins. The finding include: Observation during medication administration on [DATE] at 7:51AM identified LPN #4 preparing to dispense a multi vitamin per physician's order and noticed the bottle of multi-vitamins located in the bottom drawer of the medication cart was expired (8/2023). Interview with LPN #4 on [DATE] at 8:04 AM indicated he/she normally looks at the expiration date on the medication bottle prior to dispensing it. However, the expired bottle of multi vitamins was still available in the bottom drawer of the medication cart. Interview with the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) on [DATE] at 11:40 AM identified audits of the medication carts are performed monthly and is the responsibility of the Infection Control Nurse and pharmacy to review audits. The DNS further indicated the pharmacy reviews all medications, regardless of if in a bottle or bubble…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations of the noon meal and interviews for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #26) who was reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to prepare food by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance. The findings include: Observation on 9/13/23 at 1:00 PM identified burned vegetables on Resident #26's plate. Interview with NA #7 on 9/13/23 at 1:02 PM identified Resident #26's vegetables were burned, and the residents would be offered a different meal or sandwich when food is burned. Subsequent to inquiry, NA #7 offered Resident #26 an alternate meal. Interview with the Culinary Director on 9/20/23 at 9:56 AM identified the cook had prepared the vegetables in the oven, causing them to burn. The Culinary Director further indicated the cook had been educated on how to properly prepare vegetables and that is not appropriate or good to serve burned foods.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, facility documentation and interviews for 1 of 1 sampled resident, (Resident #12) reviewed for food allergies, the facility failed to ensure that resident received a meal free of food allergy. The findings include: Resident #12's diagnoses included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus, irritable bowel syndrome, mitral valve prolapsed and anemia. A Resident Care Plan dated 4/6/23, indicated the resident had a potential nutritional problem related to diabetes mellitus, irritable bowel syndrome and was allergic to chocolate and cocoa. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #12 as alert and cognitively intact and independent with all activities of daily living with set-up for meals only. A Nutrition Quarterly assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident food allergies including chocolate and cocoa. A physician's order summary for active orders dated as of 8/1/23, identified allergies that included chocolate and cocoa.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the Facility Assessment and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment was updated to reflect the staffing needs of the building. The findings include: Based on a review of the Facility Assessment and staff interview on 9/18/23 identified the facility failed to update the Facility Assessment's staffing grid to reflect the new Connecticut General Statute for 3.0 Staffing. The findings include: On 9/18/23 at 10:56 AM interview with DNS and Administrator and review of the Facility Assessment identified the need of 6 nurse's aide for the day shift, and 5 for the evening shift. The Administrator indicated the facility utilizes several staff that work 6:00 AM to 2:00 PM (day), 2:00 PM to 10:00 PM (evening) and 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM (night) rather than the typical 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM, 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM and the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shifts and he believed that hurt the facility's nurse aide staffing numbers for the 7:00 AM to 9:00 PM calculations. The Administrator further indicated that he was aware of the State of Connecticut's staffing 3.0…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and interviews for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #26) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to accurately document meal intake in the clinical record. The findings included: Resident #26's diagnoses included unspecified dementia, dysphagia, and gastro-esophageal disease. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 26 as severely cognitively impaired and the resident required oversight, encouragement or cueing with eating. The Resident Care Plan dated 8/8/23 identified a nutritional or potential nutritional problem and an activities of daily living self-care performance deficit. Interventions directed to allow adequate time to eat, and observe/document as indicated: meal consumption, amount of assistance needed with meal, and tolerance to diet/fluids. Observation during lunch in dining hall on 9/13/2023 identified Resident #26 picking at the food items on her/his plate, the resident was offered a sandwich, and consumed less…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program documentation, review of policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure records of QAA/QAPI were maintained.The findings include: On 9/20/23 at 11:05 AM an interview with the Administrator indicated the s/he began his/her position on 8/7/23(assisted in another capacity at the facility prior to that date) and s/he conducted the most recent Quality Assurance (QA)meeting on 8/31/23. The Administrator further indicated the concerns with Resident Advanced Directive (code status) and the intravenous therapy program (IV concerns regarding the absence of IV certifications, competencies and in-services were not addressed as he was not aware of the issues at time. The Administrator further indicated that if he/she had known about the issues a quality improvement (QI) process would have been initiated for both areas. An Interview 9/21/2023 at 3:25 PM with the Administrator, (DNS, and RN#1 present) shared the attendance list of staff for the QAPI meeting with the core attendees including the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program documentation, review of policy and interview, the facility failed to ensure systems were in place for monitoring adverse events for identified QAPI concerns. The findings include: On 9/20/23 at 11:05 AM an interview with the Administrator indicated the s/he began his/her position on 8/7/23(assisted in another capacity at the facility prior to that date) and s/he conducted the most recent Quality Assurance (QA)meeting on 8/31/23. The Administrator further indicated the concerns with Resident Advanced Directive (code status) and the intravenous therapy program (IV concerns regarding the absence of IV certifications, competencies and in-services were not addressed as he was not aware of the issues at time. The Administrator further indicated that if he/she had known about the issues a quality improvement (QI) process would have been initiated for both areas. An Interview 9/21/2023 at 3:25 PM with the Administrator, (DNS, and RN#1 present). The administrator was unable to locate any QAPI…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #9) who was observed during blood glucose testing, the facility failed to disinfect glucometer per manufacturer's instructions. The findings included: Resident # 9's diagnoses included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. A physician's order dated 7/19/23 directed to obtain blood glucose as needed. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #9 as cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with toilet use, personal hygiene, and dressing. The Resident Care Plan dated 7/27/23 identified Diabetes Mellitus 2 and hyperglycemia related to disease process renal manifestation. Interventions directed to provide a fasting serum blood sugar, monitor for signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia, and diabetes medication as ordered. Observations on 9/15/23 at 6:54 AM identified LPN# 4 administering a serum glucose test to Resident #9. Following the finger stick, LPN #4 proceeded to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, review of policy and staff interview for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 17) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the resident's bed was free from a gap. The findings include: Resident #17's diagnosis included sleep apnea, morbid obesity, diabetes mellitus. The physician's order dated 8/29/23 directed pressure relieving mattress: alternating air: settings 250, to check setting and function every shift. The care plan dated 8/29/2023 indicated Resident #17 resident requires use of ¼ transfer bars to assist with bed mobility and or transfers. Intervention included ¼ transfer bars to be applied to the head of the bed on the following sides bilateral, educate resident/representative on the risk and benefits of utilizing siderails and encourage the use of call bell. The admission-5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #17 as cognitively intact and the resident required extensive assistance of two persons for bed mobility and transfers.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and a review of staff education, the facility failed to ensure mandatory staffing was completed to meet the 12-hour annual requirement. The findings include: Interview on 9/18/23 at 11:57 AM with RN #3 identified that she had been in the staff educator role for 2 months, new hires were being provided orientation education on several topics, but the topics did not include the mandatory training in dementia care, behavioral health, specific needs. She further indicated that she would investigate further and speak with the Director of Clinical Operations regarding staff previously hired and trained. Interview on 9/18/23 at 1:20 PM with Director of Clinical Operations identified that the facility had no other staff education information to provide, other than what the staff educator had provided (new hire orientations). Interview on 9/18/23 at 2:40 PM with the staff educator, RN #3 identified that she could not find any aide competencies. RN # 3 also indicated that she was unable to provide proof of the 12-hour nurse aide training.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of two (2) residents, (Resident #359), reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure weekly assessments and treatments were in place for a resident with identified pressure ulcers. The findings include: Resident #359 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included non-Hodgkin lymphoma (cancer), multiple sclerosis and stroke. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] identified Resident #359 had an abdominal fissure moisture associated skin damage that originated on 3/9/23 that was open to air, a stage two (2) coccyx pressure injury that originated on 3/9/23 that was being treated with triad and foam and a sacral spine moisture associated skin damage that originated on 3/30/23 that was being treated with triad. It further recommended a low air loss bed, turns every two hours, and protective sacral foam dressing every three days and as needed (remove and reapply…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for Resident #23, reviewed for a choking, the facility failed to provide the resident's prescribed mechanically altered diet which resulted in the resident requiring the Heimlich maneuver. The findings include: Resident #23 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia, dysphagia, heart failure and COPD. A physician order dated 5/22/23 directed an assist level of 1:1 for eating, provide verbal cues with all solids and liquids trials to maintain the resident's attention to task and frequently alternate between solids and liquids. A physician order dated 7/25/23 directed regular diet, puree texture, and pudding thick liquids consistency. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #23 had severely impaired cognition, received a mechanically altered, therapeutic diet in which required extensive assistance of one staff member for eating and was an extensive assist of one staff for activities of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #2) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to report a significant ongoing weight loss to the physician in a timely manner. The findings included: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke, kidney cancer, disorder of thyroid. A Nutrition Risk assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 has had no significant weight changes, had a current food intake of 50 - 75%, required no therapeutic nutritional supplements and had no swallowing difficulties. Physician's order dated 2/12/21 directed to weigh Resident #2 weekly on Mondays, provide a regular house diet with regular consistency and thin liquids. Review of the Weights and Vitals Summary dated 2/14/21 identified Resident #2 weighed 137 lbs. A Dietary Note dated 2/25/21 identified Resident #2 was eating a regular diet well and maintaining weight.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #36 & #104) reviewed for an allegation of mistreatment and misappropriation of resident property, the facility failed to ensure that the resident was free from the misappropriation of property and failed to ensure that the resident was free from mistreatment. The findings include: 1. Resident #36 had diagnoses that included dementia, major depressive disorder and repeated falls. The significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #36 had moderately impaired cognition, did not display mood or behavior symptoms, required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfers, required extensive assistance of one with ambulation. The assessment further noted that the resident had sustained a fall since the previous MDS assessment dated [DATE] but had not sustained any injuries from the fall. The care plan dated 5/24/21 identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #36) reviewed for an allegation of mistreatment, the facility failed to ensure that the alleged mistreatment was reported to the state survey agency within prescribed parameters. The findings include: Resident #36 had diagnoses that included dementia, major depressive disorder and repeated falls. The significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #36 had moderately impaired cognition, did not display mood or behavior symptoms, required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfers, required extensive assistance of one with ambulation. The assessment further noted that the resident had sustained a fall since the previous MDS assessment dated [DATE] but had not sustained any injuries from the fall. The care plan dated 5/24/21 identified Resident #36 was at risk for falls related to confusion and unawareness of safety needs.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #36) reviewed for an allegation of mistreatment, the facility failed to ensure that the resident was protected from the potential for further mistreatment. The findings include: Resident #36 had diagnoses that included dementia, major depressive disorder and repeated falls. The significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #36 had moderately impaired cognition, did not display mood or behavior symptoms, required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfers, required extensive assistance of one with ambulation. The assessment further noted that the resident had sustained a fall since the previous MDS assessment dated [DATE] but had not sustained any injuries from the fall. The care plan dated 5/24/21 identified Resident #36 was at risk for falls related to confusion and unawareness of safety needs. Interventions included,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, observation, interview and review of facility policy for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #404) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to ensure safety measures were in place to prevent a fall. The findings include: Resident #404's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, heart failure and atrial fibrillation. The Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #404 was a moderate risk for falls. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident had severely impaired cognition, required limited assistance with transfers, ambulation and toilet use. The assessment further identified that the resident's balance during transition from seated to standing and walking was not steady, but Resident #404 was able to transfer from surface to surface without staff assistance. A physician's order dated 5/24/21 directed to ambulate twice daily up to 200 feet using rolling walker, gait belt and assist of one once on the first shift and once on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and interviews for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #14) who was reviewed for Skin Conditions/Non-Pressure, the facility failed to accurately code the Five-Day Minimum Data Set assessment. The findings include: Resident #14's diagnoses included acute diastolic heart failure, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and multiple sclerosis. The Resident Care Plan dated 7/27/23 identified an activities of daily living self-care deficit. Interventions directed to anticipate needs and dependence on staff for feeding. The Five-Day Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #14 as cognitively intact and had no impairment of his/her upper extremities. However, a review of Resident #14's Comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified upper extremity impairment to one side. Interview with LPN #2 on 9/18/23 at 2:50 PM failed to indicate the reason for the different entries in the 8/25/23 and 6/25/23 Minimum Data Set Assessments…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2021-08-10 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #4) reviewed for the timeliness of resident assessments, the facility failed to ensure that an annual MDS assessment was conducted within 366 days of the previous significant change assessment. The findings include: Resident #4 had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease and prostate cancer. Review of the clinical record on 8/9/21 identified the resident had a significant change assessment dated [DATE], quarterly MDS assessments dated 10/6/2020, 1/6/2021and 4/1/2021 with no other subsequent assessments completed. The record failed to identify that an annual MDS assessment with an assessment reference date of 7/7/21was completed (it should have been initiated within 366 days of the last full assessment making the assessment 30 days past the due date). Interview with RN #2 (MDS Coordinator) on 8/9/2021 at 10:35 AM identified that she maintained the resident's assessment schedule by utilizing an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2021-08-10 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Residents #2) reviewed for resident assessments, the facility failed to ensure the quarterly MDS assessments was completed within 92 days of the previous assessment. The findings include: Resident #2 had diagnoses that included stroke and non-traumatic subdural hemorrhage. Review of the clinical record identified that the resident had a significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE] with no subsequent quarterly assessment (one would have been due on 6/25/21). The electronic health record MDS tracking tool identified the quarterly minimum data set assessment reference date of (ARD) 6/25/2021 with a completion date of 7/9/2021. The assessment was twenty-seven days overdue. Interview with the MDS Coordinator (RN #2) on 8/5/2021 at 2:40 PM identified the significant change MDS (minimum data set assessment) was completed on 3/25/2021 and the quarterly MDS was due to be completed by 7/9/2021. RN #2 identified that she was responsible for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2021-08-10 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation and staff interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #404) reviewed for resident assessments, the facility failed to electronically transmit an MDS assessment to the CMS designated system within specified time parameters (within 14 days of the final completion date) The findings include: Resident #404 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's and congestive heart failure. Review of Resident #404's electronic health record's MDS dashboard (indicates all MDS assessments and the status of the assessments) identified that the resident had an admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] that was completed but not electronically submitted to the CMS designated system. Interview with the RN #2 (MDS coordinator) on 8/4/2021 at 2:40 PM identified the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] was completed and not transmitted to the CMS designated system because she missed a step during transmission which placed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2021-08-10 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interview for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident#19) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment was coded correctly related to diuretic use. The findings include: Resident #19's diagnoses included dementia, hypertension and anemia. The physician's orders dated 3/19/21 directed Hydralazine (used to treat hypertension) 100mg three times daily. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #19 received a diuretic 7 of 7 days. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #19 received a diuretic 7 of 7 days. Review of physician's orders from May 2021 through 7/6/21 failed to reflect diuretic medications were prescribed. Interview with RN #2 (MDS Coordinator) on 8/9/21 at 9:50 AM identified that she thought Hydralazine was a diuretic. RN#2 identified she must have been confusing it with another medication, Hydrochlorothiazide, which is a diuretic. RN #2 identified that she knows…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$36,384 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $9,110 — penalty dated 2026-03-30
  • $12,841 — penalty dated 2025-01-02
  • $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-05-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DENNEHY, RAYMONDIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/22/2021
KIRCHICK, JOELIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/27/2021
VERA, STEVENIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/27/2021
BERKSHIRE BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 09/22/2021
WACHUSETT VENTURES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/15/2025
ALESSANDRO, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
ANTICO, JOANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/12/2024
CABOT, MELISSAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/23/2024
DIAZ, VICTORIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/15/2024
ELLIS, SHARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2019
FOURNIER, THERESAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/15/2023
GRAY, KIMBERLYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/23/2019
HOLLIS, NICOLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/05/2023
LOPATOSKY, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/27/2021
MCCOY, RODNEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/27/2021
SLOTNICK, BARRYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/15/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$329K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 10%Other / private 27%

This home reported $329K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$352per resident / day
operating cost
$10,694per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$335per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Connecticut
$15,208/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,118/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075084. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next