No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Noble Horizons

17 Cobble Rd, Salisbury, CT 06068 · Non profit - Corporation · 91 certified beds · (860) 435-9851 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0609, F0610) — most recent Apr 20261 immediate-jeopardy citation$151,542 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $151,542 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-27)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
50 Hospital Hill Rd · (860) 364-4532 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
20 Main St · (860) 435-9388 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
22 Academy Street
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased28.0%18.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.3%6.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.1%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.7%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%22.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury9.4%3.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.9%16.4%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.6%17.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.6%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.2%4.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.3%24.7%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.5%17.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.0%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine62.5%69.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.8%24.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.2%10.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.892.061.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.701.461.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 114 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
68.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 68.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.8%CMS range 48.2–65.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.3%CMS range 6.1–12.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge68.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge68.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting85.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge83.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization11.3%CMS range 7.5–16.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.021.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.99
RN hours/ resident / day
0.54
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.21
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.74
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.67
RN hoursweekends
35.5%
Total nursing turnover
20.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 91 beds and averages 61.2 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.99 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.12 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-27)
22
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

51 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility documentation review, staff interviews, and observations, the facility failed to develop and implement a water management plan to prevent, identify, and mitigate Legionella contamination in the facility water system, resulting in Immediate Jeopardy to resident health and safety. Water testing performed in June 2024 and June 2025 identified multiple locations positive for Legionella, including Legionella pneumophila serogroups 1-14, at levels requiring immediate action in a high risk healthcare setting; however, facility leadership did not recognize the significance of the results, did not implement corrective measures, and did not communicate findings to the Infection Preventionist or Medical Director. During this period, 26 residents were diagnosed with pneumonia without evaluation for possible Legionella exposure. The facility's failure to establish a water management plan or to respond to known contamination created a likelihood of serious harm to residents, resulting in findings of Immediate Jeopardy. The findings include:A tour of the facility and review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure Resident #27 received the level of assistance identified in the care plan to prevent accidents, when staff provided only one person's assistance during a transfer despite the resident's assessed need for two person assistance. The MDS, therapy caregiver training, and the resident's care plan all directed that two staff assist with transfers using a walker; however, on 8/17/25 NA #1 attempted to transfer the resident alone, resulting in the resident losing balance, falling, and sustaining a right clavicle fracture that required pain management, orthopedic follow up, sling immobilization, and a change to mechanical lift transfers. The findings include:Resident #27 had diagnoses that included a stroke with memory, speech, and language deficits, dementia, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #27 had moderately impaired cognition, was dependent on staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #1), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the resident used an assistive device while ambulating in accordance with the plan of care resulting in a fall with injury. The finding includes: Resident #1 had diagnoses that included unilateral osteoarthritis of right knee, and was status post right knee arthroplasty. Review of Resident #1's fall risk assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was at a high risk for falls. Review of a nurse's note dated 6/11/24 identified that the resident was admitted with a wound vacuum to the right knee, the wound vacuum dressing should stay in place for seven (7) days and then the wound can be dressed with a clean dry dressing. Review of Resident #1's caregiver training record dated 6/12/2024 identified Resident #1 required the assistance of one (1) staff with use of a two (2) wheeled walker with transfers. The 5-day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #1), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure that staff provided the resident with the required assistance while ambulating and failed to use a safety device resulting in a fall with injury. The finding includes: Resident #1 had diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke), muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident #1's caregiver training record dated 3/25/2024 identified Resident #1 required the assistance of two (2) staff with use of a walker and gait belt while ambulating and the use of a gait belt and walker with transfers. Review of Resident #1's fall risk assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was at a high risk for falls. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2021-10-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to provide appropriate safety measures to prevent a fall with injury. The findings include: Resident #45's diagnoses included fracture of the right femur, fracture of 6th vertebrae, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, kyphosis, and osteoarthritis. A fall risk assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #45 was at risk for falls. The annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #45 had moderately impaired cognition, was always continent of bowel and bladder and required extensive assistance of one staff member for bed mobility, transfers, ambulation, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. Additionally, the MDS identified that Resident #45 had no falls since admission [DATE]). The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 8/26/21 identified Resident #45 had a problem with impaired activities of daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the resident was treated with respect and dignity after a fall. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included dementia. A resident care plan (RCP) dated 12/18/2025 identified Resident #1 was at risk for falls and required assistance for activities of daily living (ADL). Interventions included to anticipate Resident #1's needs and contact guard assist of two (2) for transfer. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/10/2026 identified Resident # 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four (4), indicated he/she had severe cognitive impairment, was dependent for personal hygiene, bed mobility and for transfer, and had an indwelling catheter to drain urine. A facility reportable event (RE) dated 3/25/2026 at 9:30 AM identified the DON had received a statement via email from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an allegation of mistreatment timely. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included dementia. A resident care plan (RCP) dated 12/18/2025 identified Resident #1 was at risk for falls and required assistance for activities of daily living (ADL). Interventions included to anticipate Resident #1's needs and contact guard assist of two (2) for transfer. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/10/2026 identified Resident # 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four (4), indicated he/she had severe cognitive impairment, was dependent for personal hygiene, bed mobility and for transfer, and had an indwelling catheter to drain urine. A facility reportable event (RE) dated 3/25/2026 at 9:30 AM identified a Class B (abuse) event occurred. The RE indicated on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure repositioning was provided safely and adequate supervision was provided to prevent a fall. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included dementia. A resident care plan (RCP) dated 12/18/2025 identified Resident #1 was at risk for falls and required assistance for activities of daily living (ADL). Interventions included to anticipate Resident #1's needs and contact guard assist of two (2) for transfer. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/10/2026 identified Resident # 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four (4), indicated he/she had severe cognitive impairment, and was dependent for personal hygiene, bed mobility, moving side to side, and for transfers, and had a foley catheter for urinary drainage. Further, the MDS indicated Resident #1 was 67 inches (5 foot, 7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate to include documentation of an RN assessment after a fall. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included dementia. A resident care plan (RCP) dated 12/18/2025 identified Resident #1 was at risk for falls and required assistance for activities of daily living (ADL). Interventions included to anticipate Resident #1's needs and contact guard assist of two (2) for transfer. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/10/2026 identified Resident # 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four (4), indicated he/she had severe cognitive impairment, and was dependent for personal hygiene, bed mobility, moving side to side, and for transfers, and had a foley catheter for urinary drainage. Further, the MDS indicated Resident #1 was 67 inches (5 foot, 7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #97) reviewed for hospitalizations and had multiple hospitalizations, the facility failed to ensure the resident and/or resident representative were provided with the written information regarding the bed hold policy at the time the resident was sent to the hospital and failed to ensure the ombudsman was notified of discharges at least monthly. The findings include:1.Resident #97 was admitted to the facility in November 2023 with diagnoses that included heart failure, dementia, and pneumonia.The annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #97 had severely impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living.The Resident Care Plan dated 12/11/24 identified Resident #97 as a long-term care resident and had some confusion with interventions that included orient the resident to the facility, staff, and routine.a. The nurse's note dated 2/2/25 at 1:42 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for five (5) of fifteen (15) residents ( Resident #4, Resident #47, Resident #58, Resident #68, and Resident #79) reviewed for resident assessment, the facility failed to complete comprehensive assessments within 14 days after admission and at least annually for each resident. The findings include:1.Resident #4 was admitted with diagnoses that included presence of right artificial knee joint, age related cognitive decline, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension.The MDS status report identified the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #4, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/9/2025, was completed and submitted on 2/2/2026. The MDS assessment was 185 days late.2. Resident #47 was admitted with diagnoses that included dementia and heart failure.The MDS status report identified the admission the 5-day MDS assessment for Resident #47, with an ARD of 12/8/2025 was documented completed on 2/19/2026 and submitted on 2/20/2026. The MDS assessment was 123 days late.3.Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for six (6) of fifteen (15) residents (Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #27, Resident #32, Resident #68, and Resident #75) reviewed for resident assessment, the facility failed to complete quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments timely. The findings include: 1.Resident #3 had diagnoses that included stroke and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).The Minimum Data Set (MDS) status report identified the quarterly MDS assessment with an Assessment Reference date (ARD) of 12/23/2025 for Resident #3 was still in process and had not yet been completed on 2/26/2026. The last submitted quarterly MDS assessment had an ARD of 9/24/2025. 2. Resident #4 had diagnoses that included presence of right artificial knee joint, age related cognitive decline, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension.The MDS status report identified the quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 11/26/2025 for Resident #4 was still in process and had been completed as of 2/26/2026. The last submitted quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for six (6) of fifteen (15) residents (Resident#21, Resident #24, Resident #36, #73, Resident #79, and Resident #87) reviewed for resident assessment, the facility failed to complete and transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments timely. The findings include:1.Resident #21 was admitted with diagnoses that included heart failure and atrial fibrillation (fast irregular heartbeat).The last submitted MDS assessment for Resident #21 was a 5-day assessment with an ARD of 8/29/2025. Resident #21 had a discharge MDS assessment with an ARD of 9/20/2025 that was still in process and incomplete during the survey on 2/26/2026. Resident #21 was discharged on 9/25/2025 and had not resided in the facility for over five months. 2. Resident #24 was admitted with diagnoses that included rhabdomyolysis (muscle damage releasing toxins into the blood, affecting kidneys) and dysphagia.The last submitted MDS assessment for Resident #24 was a 5-day assessment with an ARD of 8/29/2025. Resident #24 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility documentation, and interview the facility failed to implement a system to consistently and accurately reconcile controlled substances for 2 of 2 medication carts. The findings include:Although requested, the facility was unable to provide the facility monthly or bi-monthly audits of controlled substances for January 2026 or February 2026 and indicated that any previous audits could not be located at time of survey.Interview with the DNS on 2/27/2026 at 10:15 AM identified she has not reconciled any controlled substances or conducted audits since starting 31/2 months ago. The DNS identified she could not locate any bimonthly audits from the past year. The DNS indicated the controlled substance audit process involves counting the controlled substances in the two medication carts and verifying the count matches the controlled substance disposition record (CSDR). The DNS indicated that the pharmacy emailed her audit tools to reconcile and audit controlled substances. The DNS identified that without these audits, the facility cannot verify the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a tour of the Dietary Department and Nourishment rooms, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure stored food was labeled and dated when opened, expired food was discarded and failed to ensure nourishment refrigerators were maintained in a clean sanitary manner. The findings included:A tour of the Dietary Department on 2/24/26 at 7:40 AM with [NAME] #1 identified:1. Refrigerator #1 was observed to have the following items: a. one hard plastic cup with a lid not labeled but dated 2/20/26 (expired)b. one large pitcher of brown liquid covered with saran wrap not labeled or datedc. one large pitcher with brown liquid not covered, labeled or dated 2. Refrigerator #2 was observed to have the following items:a. 2 cups of yellow liquid not labeled or datedb. one cup of red liquid not labeled or dated 3. Refrigerator #3 was observed to have the following items: a. one large gallon sized plastic clear container covered with saran wrap with what appeared to be peaches dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for 1 of 3 nurse aides (NA#1), reviewed for In-service training the facility failed to ensure the nurse aide received the required In-service training. The findings include: Review of facility documentation and interview with RN #2, Infection control/staff development nurse, on 2/25/2026 at 2:00 PM identified that all NA's are required to receive a minimum of twelve (12) hours of in-service education annually. RN #2 was unable to locate in-service education for NA #1 for 2024 or 2025 that documented that NA #1 received the minimum 12 hours of Inservice education. RN #2 identified that NA #1's education file lacked documentation of education. RN #2 further stated that she should have ensured all the NAs received the minimum of 12 hours annually and had sent an email to the DNS that NA #1 had not completed the 12-hour requirement each year. She could only locate educational documents for NA #1 from 2016. Interview with the DNS on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents #27 and Resident #104) reviewed for Advance Directives, the facility failed to ensure the resident/resident representative were educated and the residents wishes were identified. The findings include1.Resident #27 had diagnoses that included a stroke with memory, speech, and language deficits and dementia. a. A nurse's note dated [DATE] at 4:04 PM identified Resident #27 was admitted to the facility with complaints of weakness to the right side of his/her body. Resident #27 is alert, essentially oriented, but per report he/she has some confusion at night. Review of the nurse's notes and social worker notes dated [DATE] through [DATE] failed to provide documentation that Person #1 (power of attorney) was provided with education on advance directives and that the code status form was signed to identify the resident or resident representative's wishes.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident # 71) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure the physician and resident representatives were notified of medication omissions. The findings include: Resident #71 had diagnoses that included stoke, Parkinson's disease, depression, and cancer.The Resident Care Plan dated 1/18/25 identified Resident #71 had a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease ( neurological disorder that causes a depletion in circulating dopamine levels in the brain) with interventions that directed to monitor for signs and symptoms of shuffling gait, pill rolling tremors, lip smacking, loss of voluntary movements, blank facial expressions, drooling, difficulty swallowing, feeling weak, easily fatigued, feeling heavy and stiff, and notify physician if any changes.The physician's orders dated 1/19/26 directed to administer Acyclovir (antiviral) 200 milligram (mg) twice a day;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #10) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin. The findings include:Resident #10 was admitted with diagnoses that included dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), systemic lupus erythematosus (lupus- a chronic autoimmune disease where healthy tissue was inflamed and damaged) and peripheral vascular disease (arteries in leg and arms become blocked).The RCP dated 9/20/3035 identified Resident #10 was at risk for impaired skin due to fragile skin secondary to long term steroid use with interventions that included to monitor skin with transfers and during care reporting any changes.The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/6/2025 identified Resident # 10 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicative of moderately impaired cognition, required substantial assistance for transfer and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #10) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for an injury of unknown origin. The findings include: Resident #10 was admitted with diagnoses that included dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), systemic lupus erythematosus (lupus- a chronic autoimmune disease where healthy tissue was inflamed and damaged) and peripheral vascular disease (arteries in leg and arms become blocked).The RCP dated 9/20/3035 identified Resident #10 was at risk for impaired skin due to fragile skin secondary to long term steroid use with interventions that included to monitor skin with transfers and during care reporting any changes.The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/6/2025 identified Resident # 10 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicative of moderately impaired cognition, required substantial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #4) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan to address the resident's diagnosis of dementia. The findings include:Resident #4 was admitted with diagnoses that included dementia, presence of right artificial knee joint, age related cognitive decline, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension.The admission orders dated 8/21/25 identified Resident #10 had a diagnosis of dementia.The nursing admission note dated 8/21/2025 at 4:14 PM identified Resident #10 had diagnoses that included weakness, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and dementia. The note further identified Resident #10's family provided consent for psychiatric evaluation.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/28/25 identified that Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating moderately impaired cognition, and an active diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Residents #71) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders. The findings include: Resident #71 had diagnoses that included stoke, Parkinson's disease, depression, and cancer. The Resident Care Plan dated 1/18/25 identified Resident #71 had a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease ( neurological disorder that causes a depletion in circulating dopamine levels in the brain) with interventions that directed to monitor for signs and symptoms of shuffling gait, pill rolling tremors, lip smacking, loss of voluntary movements, blank facial expressions, drooling, difficulty swallowing, feeling weak, easily fatigued, feeling heavy and stiff, and notify physician if any changes.The physician's orders dated 1/19/26 directed to administer Acyclovir (antiviral) 200 milligram (mg) twice a day; Amlodipine (used to lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for three (3) of three (3) nurse aides (NA #1, NA #2 and NA #3), the facility failed to complete performance reviews at least once every 12 months as required. The findings include: Review of NA #1's personnel file identified a hire date of 11/14/2008. NA#1 was listed on the current nursing staff contact list.Review of NA #2's personnel file identified a hire date of 7/6/1992. NA# was listed on the current nursing staff contact list. Review of NA #3's personnel file identified a hire date of 7/17/2001. NA# was listed on the current nursing staff contact list. Interview with the Administrator on 2/25/26 at 10:00 AM identified that the Director of Nursing (DNS) is responsible for ensuring annual performance reviews are completed. The Administrator stated he was not surprised that NA #1, NA #2, and NA #3 had not received recent performance reviews because there had been recent transition in the DNS position. due to a recent transition in the DNS position. Interview and review of the employee files with the Human…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for facility Administration review, the facility failed to ensure the facility administered its resources effectively and to ensure effective administrative oversight of staff and resident care timely to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of residents. The findings include: Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for facility Administration review, the facility failed to ensure the facility administered its resources effectively and to ensure effective administrative oversight of staff and resident care timely to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of residents. The findings include: The facility administration failed to: Develop and implement a water management plan.Prevent and mitigate Legionella growth in the facility's water.Ensure the State Agency was notified, in a timely manner, of reportable events.Ensure injuries of unknown…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the clinical records, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the antibiotic stewardship program included a process for tracking antibiotic use, protocols, trends, and outcomes, and failed to develop, promote, and implement a facility-wide system to monitor the use of antibiotics. The findings include: Interview and review of the facility infection control program with RN #2 (Infection Preventionist) on 2/25/26 at 11:30 AM identified the facility does not maintain current or complete tracking of antibiotic use. RN #2 identified she has not implemented antibiotic stewardship principles to reduce adverse events, including antibiotic-resistant organisms, resulting from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use. RN #2 identified the facility does not have a facility-wide system to monitor antibiotic use.Interview with RN #2 on 2/25/26 at 12:28 PM identified the facility uses a 3-day urine protocol (a diagnostic or surveillance approach focused on indwelling catheters) to prevent overuse of antibiotics; however, no other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, facility policy, facility documentation, and interviews for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #9, #26, and #100) reviewed for pneumococcal immunizations, the facility failed to ensure the resident and/or resident representatives were educated and given an opportunity to consent or decline the pneumococcal vaccine and for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #26) reviewed for influenza immunizations, the facility failed to offer the influenza immunization to the resident upon admission. The findings include: 1.Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included hypertension, stroke, and arthritis.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #9 had intact cognition and Resident #9 had received the pneumococcal vaccine.Review of Resident #9's immunization record identified the resident had a pneumococcal vaccine on 1/1/2018. However, the clinical records and consent records failed to identify Resident #11 was offered the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #1), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan timely after the resident sustained a fall. The findings include: Resident #1 had diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (a stroke), muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility. The admission fall risk assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 at risk for falls. The care plan dated 3/25/2024 identified Resident #1 at risk for falls with interventions that directed to assist with maintaining a clutter free environment, physical therapy and occupational therapy to increase muscle tone and endurance, and to utilize a gait belt for transfers and when walking the resident. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting, and had one one fall since admission to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-21 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility documentation review, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure nurses were assessed to be competent in intravenous (IV) therapy. The findings include: A review of the nursing IV competencies identified that the last review was completed on 12/23/22. An interview with the Staff Educator on 3/19/24 at 9:59 AM identified she was responsible for ensuring IV competencies are provided annually. The Staff Educator became aware that IV competencies were outdated sometime after July 2023 when she became employed at the facility. The Staff Educator felt she herself needed training in IV certification before educating staff and discussed the concern with the Director of Nursing Services who indicated the need would be addressed. The Staff Educator further identified she had not yet received training. An interview with the DNS on 3/19/24 at 11:16AM identified IV competencies should be completed according to policies. A review of the facility policy for Skills Assessment/Continued Competencies directed all employees will have specific skills assessed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a tour of the kitchen, facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that expired food was discarded. The findings included: A tour of the kitchen on 3/15/24 at 10:30 AM with the Director of Dining Services identified the following in the dry storage room and the overflow dry storage room: a. 12- 6 lb. cans of beets expired 12/28/23. b. 6-6 lb. cans of corn expired 12/28/23. c. 3- 8.8 boxes of [NAME] Chickpea Rotini expired 8/21/23. An interview with Director of Dining Services on 3/15/24 at 10:45 AM identified he checks the food storage monthly for expiration dates and discards outdated food. Further, all dietary staff should be checking dates. The Director of Dining Services could not explain why the expired foods were not discarded. Review of the Dietary Services policy dated 7/28/21 directs in part, all food must have a date when it is opened and dated when it is stored. Most recent dates are utilized first, and new orders are stocked to the back of the rotation to prevent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    A review of the Facility Assessment sheet failed to ensure the facility assessment included therapeutic facility pets and individualized resident pets to meet the needs of the residents and failed to ensure the therapy pets were up to date with vaccinations and veterinary visits per facility policy. The findings included: Interview and review of facility document with the Director of Recreation on 3/21/2024 at 10:50 AM indicated 2 cats live in the facility (Cat #1 and Cat #2) and are available to all residents one of which had documentation of up-to-date vaccination for rabies and wellness examination, no distemper (Cat #1) and the other (Cat #2)was overdue for Rabies vaccine since 2020( initial vaccine 11/4/2019 due for booster 10/4/2020( 3 years 5 months ago) then the three year rabies vaccine was due 11/3/2022 ( 2 years 4 months ago). Further review of facility documentation identified Cat #2's last wellness exam was 11/4/2019 (3 years 5 months ago) and no evidence of a distemper vaccine. After surveyor inquiry, the Recreation Director indicated Cat #2 had an appointment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility policy and interviews for 8 out of 11 sampled residents, (Residents #5, # 8, #13, # 25, # 29, #31, #35, and # 38) observed eating lunch in the [NAME] dinning/activity room, the facility failed to ensure the residents experienced a dignity dining by not serving food on a dietary tray. The findings include: Observation of the noon meal service on 3/13/24 at 12:15 PM identified 8 residents (Residents #5, # 8, #13, # 25, # 29, #31, #35, and # 38) were served their meal on a dietary tray. The residents' food and drink items remained on the dietary tray and not on the dining table. Interview on 3/19/24 at 9:35 AM with Nurse Aide (NA#1) identified food remain on the tray because residents spill their food and drink therefore causing a mess. The dietary tray helps to contain the mess. Interview on 3/19/24 at 9:50 with Assistant Director of Nursing Services (ADNS) identified drink and food items should be removed from the dietary tray and set in front of the resident. The ADNS also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy, and staff interviews for 1of 1 resident (Resident # 57) reviewed for Advanced Directive, the facility failed to ensure that an updated code status form was signed by the resident and physician to reflect Resident #57 wishes and physician's orders. The findings include: Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included venous insufficiency, urinary tract infection, and anxiety. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #57 cognitively intact, requires supervision assistance for bed mobility, and personal hygiene, independent for toileting, transfer, and eating. Review of the clinical record identified Resident #57 had a signed Advanced Directive form on 4/17/23 from her/himself along with the physician which identified Resident #57 was a full code. Further review identified a physician's order dated 5/1/23 directed Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). However, the clinical record failed to provide evidence that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 5 residents, (Resident #52) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a medication refusal. The findings include: Resident #52's diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus and heart failure. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #52 as cognitively intact, independent with bed mobility, supervision with transfer, toileting, and ambulation. The Resident Care Plan Dated 2/29/24 identified Resident #52 as type II diabetes mellitus. Interventions directed to monitor diet, laboratory values, glucose monitoring and the physician/Nurse Practitioner would review Resident #52's diabetic medications, sliding scale orders, Accu-Check (blood glucose monitoring) schedule, diet, and individualized orders for glycemic management accordingly. The physician's orders dated 3/1/24 directed Humalog insulin (fast acting hormone used in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documents, review of policy and staff interviews for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident # 40), the facility failed to assess the use of full siderails at night to ensure the resident was free from a physical restraint and failed to obtain a consent for the utilization of the siderails. The findings include: Resident #40 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] after hospitalization for surgical repair of a hip fracture sustained after having a fall. Resident # 40's diagnosis included aftercare following a joint replace with presence of an artificial hip joint after fracture of part of the neck of the femur, cognitive communication deficit and Alzheimer's disease. A Side Rail Assessment and consent dated 2/22/2024 with no time, indicated Resident # 40 returned from the hospital after having hip surgery had poor safety awareness and family member requested to have 2 full siderails in place. The reason for use indicated for safety with risks and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview for 1 of 3 resident (Resident # 47) with a change in condition, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive resident assessment was completed timely after a significant change in condition was identified and for 1 of 2 residents at risk for weight loss for ( Resident 38), the facility failed to complete a significant change of condition for the resident's weight loss. The findings included: 1. Resident #47's diagnosis included fracture of the right femur, pressure ulcer of the sacrum, deep tissue damage of the left hip and right heel. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #47 had no pressure ulcers. The care plan dated 3/8/2024 indicated Resident #47 was at risk for unavoidable pressure or currently has an unavoidable pressure injury(ulcer) related to poor nutrition, immobility, and incontinence. Interventions included to provide stage appropriate wound care and controlled risk factors for prevention of additional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, facility policy review, and interview for 4 of 4 residents (Residents #12, #32, #53, #56) reviewed for Resident Assessment, the facility failed to ensure the residents quarterly assessments were completed timely. The findings included: Clinical record review of the following completion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments identified: 1. Resident #12's quarterly MDS assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/1/24 was due on 2/15/24. However further review identified the resident's quarterly assessment was not completed as of 3/19/24. (33 days late) 2. Resident #32's quarterly MDS assessment with ARD of 1/8/24 was due on 1/22/24. However further review identified the resident's quarterly assessment was not completed as of 3/19/24. (57 days late) 3. Resident #53's quarterly MDS assessment with ARD of 2/6/24 was due on 2/20/24. However further review identified the resident's quarterly assessment was not completed as of 3/19/24. (28 days late) 4. Resident #56's annual MDS assessment with ARD of 2/1/24 was due on 2/15/24. However further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and interviews for 4 of 4 residents (Residents #12, #32, #53, #56) reviewed for Resident's Assessment, the facility failed to ensure the residents assessment were submitted timely. The findings included: Clinical record review of the following completion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments identified: 1. Resident #12's quarterly MDS with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/1/24 was due on 2/15/24 and required submission on 2/29/24; however, Resident #12's assessment was not submitted as of 3/19/24. (19 days late) 2. Resident #32's quarterly MDS with ARD of 1/8/24 was due on 1/22/24 and required submission on 2/5/24; however, Resident #32's assessment was not submitted as of 3/19/24 (43 days late) 3. Resident #53's quarterly MDS with ARD of 2/6/24 was due on 2/20/24 and required submission on 3/5/24; however, Resident #53's assessment was not submitted as of 3/19/24. (14 days late) 4. Resident #56's annual MDS with ARD of 2/1/24 was due on 2/15/24 and required submission on 2/29/24; however, Resident #56's assessment was not submitted as of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record, facility policy and staff interview for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #52) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was comprehensive and individualized for a resident who did not require a safety device. The findings include: Resident #52's diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus and heart failure. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #52 as cognitively intact, required partial assistance of one with transfers and ambulation and did not require any electronic devices that monitor movement. The Resident Care Plan dated 8/25/23 identified Resident #52 as at risk for falls and took chances transferring him/herself. Interventions directed use of alarms to notify staff that the resident had needs and required assistance, do not leave the resident alone on the toilet during the time the safety device was in use and re-evaluate the need for bed/chair alarms. An observation on 3/18/24 at 7:34 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents for (Residents # 11 and # 38), the facility failed to revise the care plan after after the resident experienced falls and for 1 of 5 sampled resident, (Resident# 57) reviewed for care planning, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised to reflect a resident who frequently refused a daily treatment and for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to revise the care plan after several falls. The findings included: 1. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included heart failure, generalized muscle weakness, and repeated falls. The care plan dated 6/28/23 identified Resident #11 as at risk for falls related to a history of multiple falls. Interventions included arranging the resident's room so that necessary items are kept accessible, remind the resident to use the call bell, ensuring adequate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and staff interviews for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #11) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure that neurological checks were completed to professional standards after a resident's unwitnessed falls per facility policy. The findings include: Resident #11 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included heart failure, generalized muscle weakness, and repeated falls. The care plan dated 6/28/23 identified Resident #11 as at risk for falls related to a history of multiple falls. Interventions included arranging the resident's room so that necessary items are kept accessible, reminding the resident to use the call bell, ensuring adequate lighting, performing safety checks per policy, reviewing medications if needed, and re-evaluating the need for bed/chair alarms. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident as cognitively intact and independent in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview for 1 of 2 residents (Resident # 47) reviewed for at risk for pressure ulcer, the facility failed to consistently document turning and repositioning of the resident in accordance with facility practice. The findings include: Resident #47's diagnosis included fracture of the right femur, pressure ulcer of the sacrum, deep tissue damage of the left hip and right heel. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #47 had no pressure ulcers. The care plan dated 3/8/2024 indicated Resident #47 was at risk for unavoidable pressure or currently has an unavoidable pressure injury(ulcer) related to poor nutrition, immobility, and incontinence. Interventions included to provide stage appropriate wound care and controlled risk factors for prevention of additional ulcers, pain management and pressure reduction such as specialty mattress, chair cushions, heel protectors, incontinence products/supplies and nutritional supplements. A review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews , facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for the 2 of 5 sampled resident reviewed for accidents for (Resident # 10), the facility failed to ensure that staff conducted safety checks as directed by the manufacture to ensure the alarm was functional and for (Resident # 11), the facility failed to ensure fall assessment was completed after every fall per facility policy. The findings included: 1. Resident #10 's diagnoses included dementia, abnormalities of gait, and rheumatoid arthritis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #10 as severely cognitively impaired and required moderate assistance for toilet transfer, maximal assistance for showering, and moderate assistance for upper body dressing. A physician's order dated 8/25/23 directed to use a Tab alarm for safety when the resident was unattended. The Resident Care Plan dated 8/25/23 identified falls as a problem. Interventions included use of a Tab alarm, to anticipate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 5 residents, (Resident #38) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to respond to pharmacy recommendations for a resident receiving psychotropic medications. The findings include: Resident #38 had diagnoses that included anxiety disorder and depression. The admission MDS assessment dated 1/31 24 identified Resident #38 was moderately cognitively impaired and dependent with ADL assist. The RCP dated 2/7/24 identified Resident #38 utilized psychotropic drugs related to anxiety, depression, and dementia. Interventions directed to attempt gradual dose reductions as prescribed and refer to APRN (psychiatric) consults. The physician's orders dated 2/24/24 directed Trazadone 50 mg every 8 Hours PRN (as needed) for agitation with no identified date of discontinuation. A Pharmacy Consult dated 3/4/24 recommended including a 'stop' date for the PRN use of Trazadone with no documented provider response. An interview with the DNS on 3/20/24 at 1:13 PM identified all pharmacy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration opportunities (Resident #57), the facility failed to ensure medications were administered timely and medication errors did not exceed 5%. The findings include. Resident #57's diagnosis included localized swelling and edema, vitamin deficiency and left knee effusion (excess fluid buildup in the knee joint). The physician's order dated 4/17/2023 directed vitamin C 250 mg tablet to be administered orally once daily at 8:00AM. The physician's order dated 11/2/2023 directed Vitamin D3 capsule (600 international units) be given orally daily at 8:00 AM. The physician's order dated 12/19/2023 directed Hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg tablet one orally be given once daily at 8:00 AM for edema. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated in part Resident #57 was cognitively intact. The care plan dated 1/31/2024 indicated Resident #57 with increased weight with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for of 1 of 5 residents, (Resident #52) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from a significant medication error following the administration of an unprescribed reduced dose of insulin. The findings include: Resident #52's diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus and heart failure. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #52 as cognitively intact, independent with bed mobility, supervision with transfer, toileting, and ambulation. The Resident Care Plan Dated 2/29/24 identified Resident #52 as type II diabetes mellitus. Interventions directed to monitor diet, laboratory values, glucose monitoring and the physician/Nurse Practitioner would review Resident #52's diabetic medications, sliding scale orders, Accu-Check (blood glucose monitoring) schedule, diet, and individualized orders for glycemic management accordingly. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy and staff interview for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications, the facility failed to ensure clinical records were complete and accurate containing pharmacy recommendations. The findings include: Resident #32's diagnosis included dementia with psychotic disturbance, anxiety, and depressive episodes. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #32 was cognitively impaired and received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. The care plan dated 1/23/2024 indicated resident received psychotropic medications including psychotropic Drugs. Interventions included: to monitor mood and response to the medications, consult with the psychiatric APRN, to conduct an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale assessment (AIMS) every 6 months and assess and record effectiveness and side effects of the medication. Interview and record review with the DNS on 3/20/2024 at 10:30 AM indicated a monthly pharmacy review was completed and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director attended Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings quarterly. The findings include: On 3/21/24 at 11:20 AM an interview and facility document review indicated QAPI meeting occurred every three months. Although, the Medical Director was on the list of members that were required to attend the QAPI meeting quarterly there was no evidence of the Medical Director's attendance at the QAPI meeting found from January 2023 through 3/21/2024(one year, 2 months). The DNS indicated the Medical Director is aware of his/her need to attend the meetings but may not have been able to attend the meeting. The Medical Director is updated at the medical staff meetings. Evidence of the medical staff meetings was requested but not provided. On 3/21/2024 at 11:44 AM attempts to reach the Medical Director via phone were unsuccessful. The facility policy labeled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) indicated in part the QAPI program is a comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility Infection Control Program, facility policy and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control policies and procedures were reviewed annually. The findings include: A review of the facility's infection Control policies and procedures during the survey identified the facility failed to provide documented evidence that policies were reviewed annually. An interview and facility documentation review with the Director of Nursing Services on 3/13/24 at 1:00 PM identified the facility never previously required a documented review of current policies and procedures. Although requested, a policy for the review of policies and procedures was not provided.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview during a tour of the Dietary Department, the facility failed to document monitoring of sanitizing concentrations and ensure that dishwasher temperatures met the minimum requirements. The finding included: During tour of Dietary Department on 10/18/21 at 9:25 AM with the Food Service Director (FSD) the following was identified. 1. The three compartment sink was noted to lack daily testing/ monitoring documentation of the chemical sanitizer solution (concentration level). 2. The dishwasher was noted to fail meeting minimum required temperature. Washing temperature was noted at 140 degrees (manufacturer instructions identified a required temperature as 160 degrees for the wash cycle). The rinse cycle was noted to be at 172 degrees (manufacturer instructions identified a required temperature 180 degrees for the rinse cycle). 3. Two serving scoops were noted to be stored and immersed within the packaged food item (one in the flour and one in the sugar). Interview and review with the FSD on 10/18/21 at 12:46 PM indicated that she immediately switched to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    On 10/14/21 at 9:30 AM, during document review, the surveyor was not provided with documentation by the Maintenance Representative or the Administrator that identified that the facility had a comprehensive water management plan in place as required by S&C 17-30 ALL. The facility had results of tests that were conducted but had no record of a committee, meeting minutes, or areas of the facility that are a concern.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-03-21 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of facility posted staffing ratios and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the daily census was written on the 24-hour nurse staffing sheet posted in the lobby for the view of the residents and the public. The findings included: An observation on 3/13/2024 at 9:05 AM of the daily 24-hour nurse staffing sheet posted in the lobby of the facility noted no resident census written on the space in the right upper hand corner of the form. On 3/20/2024 at 9:00 AM the posted 24-hour nurse staffing in the front lobby was missing the census in the space provided in the right upper corner of the form. An interview with Receptionist #1 at the time of the observation indicated the scheduler completed the forms in advance and provided several days at a time and the receptionist posts the form daily. On 3/20/2024 at 9:05 AM an interview with the Scheduler over the phone indicated initially it was the receptionist's responsibility to write in the census on the form before posting then indicated it was his/her own responsibility to have added the census to the form. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$151,542 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $126,965 — penalty dated 2026-02-27
  • $14,050 — penalty dated 2024-07-09
  • $10,527 — penalty dated 2024-03-21
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-05-27 for 8 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
LARGE, MERCEDESEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/01/2022
LATINA, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/16/2024
MARTINEZ, CYNTHIAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/01/2022
SHAHEN, CYNTHIAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/01/2022
THOMPSON, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2025
ANQUILLARE, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2024
BALDONI, DOREENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2022
CANUEL, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2022
FIDANZA, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/30/2024
GILLAND, PATRICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/19/2001
GOLAS, MARGARETIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2022
MCGOVERN, KENNETHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2022
MOORE, P WAYNEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2022
POND, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2018
OH, JONG GILIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-23.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$553K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 54%Medicare 10%Other / private 36%

This home reported $553K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$471per resident / day
operating cost
$14,311per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$380per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Connecticut
$15,208/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,118/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075236. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next