Masonicare At Bishop Wicke Health & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 179 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 46.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 98 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 111.8 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.47 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.84 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.59 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews, for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure adequate nutritional status and timely identification and response to significant weight loss. This included failure to accurately monitor and evaluate weight changes, obtain a timely re-weight to confirm a significant weight loss, recognize and act upon poor oral intake, notify the physician and Registered Dietitian (RD), implement nutritional interventions, and respond to family concerns. These failures resulted in a significant, unaddressed weight loss and severe malnutrition requiring hospitalization and clinical intervention. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included vascular dementia, history of falls, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD), and depression.The significant change in condition Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the clinical record review, facility documentation review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the resident was properly positioned prior to the provision of care resulting in a fall out of bed. The resident sustained a fractured ankle. The finding includes: Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included Alzheimers disease, osteoarthritis, and abnormalities of mobility. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition, height was 67 inches, weight 181 pounds, and required maximum staff assistance with bed mobility. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/28/2024 identified Resident #1 had decreased mobility and was at risk for falls. Interventions included one (1) staff assist for bed mobility. Facility incident report dated 6/28/2024 at 10 PM identified a NA asked the resident to turn onto his/her side so that the NA could provide care. When Resident #1 went…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation/policies, and interviews, for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for a change in condition, the facility failed to ensure timely notification of the physician, Registered Dietitian (RD) and resident's representative when the resident experienced a significant weight loss and decline in nutritional status, which delayed clinical assessment and intervention for a significant weight loss. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included vascular dementia, history of falls, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD), and depression.The significant change in condition Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired and unable to make reasonable and consistent decisions regarding tasks of daily living (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3) and required supervision when eating.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/21/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, interviews, and review of facility documents and policies for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #2) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to complete an evaluation and assessment following a resident's fall in accordance with facility policy. The findings included:Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in December of 2025 with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's, transient ischemic attack, and depression. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had moderate cognitive impairment (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7), required substantial assistance with personal hygiene, toileting, and bathing and was a partial to moderate assist of one (1) with transfers and ambulation with a walker. Review of the Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/18/25 identified Resident #2 had impaired physical mobility due to Parkinson's Disease and was at risk for falls. Interventions directed to assist Resident #2 with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-17 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #58) reviewed for food choices, the facility failed to provide the correct diet. The findings include:Resident #58's diagnoses included hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), and gout.The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #58 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 14 indicating intact cognition, was dependent with personal hygiene, rolling left and right and with chair/bed-to-chair transfers, and required set-up assistance with eating. A signed Physician order dated 2/29/2024 identified Resident #58 had an allergy to garlic. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 5/30/2024 and in effect at the time of survey identified Resident #58 had a nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem related to diagnoses of hypertension, GERD, morbid obesity, constipation, gout, and a food allergy to garlic. Interventions included educating…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy during a tour of the kitchen, the facility failed to ensure open food items were dated to include opened, expired, and used by dates, and failed to perform hand hygiene prior to placing gloves on during food preparation and food service. The findings include: 1. On 9/10/25 at 9:15 AM, during the initial brief kitchen tour and interview with the Food Service Director, identified in freezer #2, a previously opened and repackaged bag of raspberry turnovers with a handwritten best used by date of 6/7/25 and a previously opened and repackaged bag of apple turnovers, with a handwritten best used by date of 7/11/25. In the refrigerator on the second shelf was a thawed package of ground veal with a handwritten date of 9/2/25, indicating when it was thawed, along with a handwritten note for the veal to be used by 9/4/25. The Food Service Director stated that staff used the best used by date as the food's expiration date. Subsequent to the surveyor's inquiry, the Food Service Director noted she would dispose of the expired raspberry and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #87) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to perform hand washing/sanitization during wound care. The findings include:Resident #87's diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease, dementia, and traumatic brain injury.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #87 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 indicating severe cognitive impairment, was dependent for personal hygiene, rolling left and right, and chair/bed-to-chair transfers, and had an unstageable pressure ulcer presenting as a deep tissue injury (DTI).The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 9/10/2025 identified Resident #87 had a DTI on his/her left inner heel related to immobility and peripheral vascular disease. Interventions included administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness, initiate Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) per orders, and follow…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and policy for 1 of 8 sampled residents (Resident #93), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to revise the Resident Care Plan (RCP) following a fall. The findings include:Resident #93's diagnoses included osteoarthritis, gout, and adjustment disorder.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #93 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating intact cognition and required partial/moderate assistance for lower body dressing, and transfers. Additionally, the MDS identified Resident #93 had a fall in the month prior to admission.The Resident Care Plan dated 8/30/25 identified Resident #93 was at risk for falls related to weakness. Interventions included anticipating and meeting resident needs, appropriate footwear when ambulating, maintain a safe environment free of spills, clutter, adequate lighting, call light and personal items in reach, and keep the bed in low…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interview for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #49 and Resident #109) reviewed for skin issues, the facility failed to ensure neurological assessments were completed after falls. The findings include: 1. Resident #49 had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, and anxiety. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #49 was severely cognitively impaired, used a wheelchair, required setup or clean-up assistance with eating, substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility, and was dependent for transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/7/24 identified Resident #49 was at risk for falls related to poor safety awareness and medical conditions. Interventions included to ensure Resident #49's call light was within reach, ensure prompt, and review information on past falls and attempt to determine possible root causes of falls, and alter or remove any potential causes if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, review of the clinical record, and facility policy for the only sampled resident (Resident #43) reviewed for communication difficulties, the facility failed to identify a change in communication ability had occurred and failed to provide appropriate services related to the change in status. The findings include:Resident #43's diagnoses included cerebral infarction, acquired deformity of head, left sided hemiplegia, and adjustment disorder with depressed mood.The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #43 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment, was independent with eating, required moderate assistance with oral hygiene, was dependent on chair/bed-to-chair transfers, and had obvious or likely cavities or broken natural teeth and clear speech with distinct intelligible words.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 7/11/2024 identified he/she had oral/dental health problems related to some broken…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, clinical record review, and facility policy for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #7) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to set an alternating pressure mattress at the correct setting, per the physician order. The findings include: Resident #7's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, and unspecified systolic (congestive) heart failure. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #7 had a short-term and long-term memory problem and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, rolling left and right in bed, lying to sitting on side of bed, and transfers. Additionally, the assessment identified 1 stage 3 pressure ulcer that was not present upon admission/entry or reentry into the facility and that there was a pressure reducing device for the bed. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 8/12/2025 identified Resident #7 had a pressure ulcer to the coccyx related to immobility and bowel/bladder incontinence. Interventions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 8 sampled residents (Resident #16 and Resident #49) reviewed for accidents, for Resident #16, the facility failed to transfer a resident according to the plan of care resulting in a fall, and for Resident #49, the facility failed to implement new Resident Care Plan (RCP) interventions following falls, and failed to utilize wheelchair equipment according to the Resident Care Plan. The findings include: 1. Resident #16's diagnoses included pain in left hip, abnormalities of gait and mobility, Parkinson's disease, psychotic disturbance, and anxiety. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #16 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14, indicating no cognitive impairment and required a wheelchair/walker for mobility and needed partial/moderate assistance for bed mobility, toileting, and bathing transfers. A Facility Reported Incident (FRI) form dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-07-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $392K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT