Ark Healthcare & Rehabilitation At Governors House

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 126 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 66.4 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, staff interview, and review of facility documentation for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #39) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure off-loading of the heels was implemented to prevent a pressure ulcer. The findings include: Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of cerebral vascular infarction (CVA), pleural effusion, and hemiplegia/hemiparesis. A Discharge Summary from the hospital dated 10/20/23 identified Resident #39's skin was without rashes, ulcerations, or petechiae. An admission Braden scale dated 10/20/23 identified Resident #39 was at moderate risk for skin breakdown. A Health Status note dated 10/20/23 identified Resident #39's skin was clean, dry, and intact. The admission Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #39 was moderately cognitively impaired and required maximum assistance for eating, was dependent for toileting, transfers, dressing and personal hygiene.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and interviews for one sample resident (Resident #70) who experienced a significant change in condition, the facility failed to notify the physician and/or family of the significant change of condition. The findings include:Resident #70 had diagnoses that included protein malnutrition, chronic kidney disease, benign neoplasm of meninges, and dementia.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #70 had moderate cognitive impairment, and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, toileting, hygiene, transfers, and ambulation. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 2/19/25 identified Resident #70 had a nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem related to kidney disease, neoplasm of meninges and dementia. Care plan interventions directed to monitor, record, and report to the physician signs and symptoms of malnutrition, evaluate and make diet changes as recommended, obtain and monitor laboratory or diagnostic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews one sampled record (Resident #70) review for significant change, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse assessed the resident after a significant change of condition and for one sampled resident (Resident #58) reviewed for pain, the facility failed to ensure a medication was administered according to the physician's order, and for one of two residents (Resident #64) reviewed for pain management, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were obtained timely when a medication was unavailable. The findings include: Resident #70 had diagnoses that included protein malnutrition, chronic kidney disease, benign neoplasm of meninges, and dementia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #70 had moderate cognitive impairment, and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, toileting, hygiene, transfers, and ambulation. The Resident Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for the one sampled resident (Resident #42) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to provide respiratory care and services as ordered by the physician (failed to deliver humidified oxygen as ordered), failed to notify the physician when there was a change in oxygen equipment, failed to ensure oxygen equipment was used according to the manufacturer specifications (application of the non-rebreather without the appropriate oxygen flow rate, or reservoir inflated), and failed to have trained, competent, qualified staff to provide oxygen therapy services. The findings include:Resident #42 was admitted to the facility October 2025 with diagnoses that included systemic Lupus Erythematosus, coronary artery disease, vitamin D deficiency and unstable angina. (No specific respiratory diagnosis)The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #42 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #2 and 3) reviewed for pressure injuries (ulcers), the facility failed to ensure Braden scale assessments and weekly skin checks were documented and completed per facility policy. The findings include:1. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease and dementia.The Braden scale assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 was at moderate risk for developing pressure injuries.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had moderate impairment in cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10), had one (1) unstageable pressure injury, and was at risk for developing pressure injuries.A physician's order dated 4/4/25 directed weekly skin checks.The Braden scale assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 was at risk for developing pressure injuries.The care plan dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for two of three residents (Resident #1 and 2) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the resident was treated with respect and dignity. The findings include: a. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included intellectual disability, autism, and anxiety. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/12/2025 identified Resident # 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated moderately impaired cognition, and required set-up assistance for eating. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/17/2025 identified Resident #1 required assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs) due to intellectual disability and had behaviors such as impulsiveness and screaming at staff. Interventions directed to encourage independence with ADLs and assist as needed. A facility reportable event (RE) form dated 3/11/2025 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an allegation of abuse timely. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included intellectual disability, autism, and anxiety. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/12/2025 identified Resident # 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated moderately impaired cognition, and required set-up assistance for eating. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/17/2025 identified Resident #1 required assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs) due to intellectual disability and had behaviors such as impulsiveness and screaming at staff. Interventions directed to encourage independence with ADLs and assist as needed. A facility reportable event (RE) form dated 3/11/2025 at 10:00 AM identified an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse without injury. NA #2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy review, and interviews for two of three sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) who were reviewed for an allegation of resident-to-resident physical abuse, Resident #1 had the right to be free from physical abuse by Resident #2. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included stroke with resultant right sided hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), epilepsy (seizure disorder), post-traumatic stress syndrome, developmental disability, anxiety, and depression. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 rarely or never made decisions regarding tasks of daily living, needed substantial assistance with turning and repositioning while in bed, moderate assistance getting in and out of the bed and chair, and was independent for mobility with a wheelchair. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/23/24 identified Resident #1 had impaired balance and was at risk for mood changes.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the staff interviews, facility documentation, and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to ensure that Infection Prevention Control Program standards (IPCP) policies and procedures are reviewed annually by the Administrator, Medical Director, and the Director of Nursing and that the facility maintained an updated list of residents with Multidrug Resistant Organism. (MDRO) The findings included: On 3/1/24 at 11:07 AM, review of the Infection Prevention policies/procedure manual with RN #6 (the Infection Preventionist) and RN #7 (the previous Infection Preventionist) failed to identify the policies had been reviewed and signed by the Administrator, Medical Director, and Director of Nursing annually. Additionally, the signature page was blank, with no signatures present and both RNs stated that they were unaware that the policies needed to be signed on an annual bases. The MDRO (Multidrug Resistant Organisms) list was last updated on 4/14/23 with some of those residents having been discharged or no longer in the same rooms as identified on the MDRO list. RN #7…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #7 and Resident #43) reviewed for unnecessary medication, the facility failed respond to pharmacy recommendations related to an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication. The findings include: 1. Resident #7's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder and Type 2 diabetes. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #7 was moderately cognitively impaired, required practical assistance with shower transfer and toileting hygiene and maximal assistance with showering. The Resident Care Plan dated 11/10/23 identified Resident #7 had episodes being resistive to care- refused to shower and refused to change clothes. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered, monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. A physician's order dated 11/13/23 directed to provide Ativan (Lorazepam) 0.5 milligrams (mg), give 1 tablet by mouth every 24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 5 residents (Resident # 7 and #43) reviewed for unnecessary medication, the facility failed to order as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications for only 14 days. The findings include: 1. Resident #7's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder and Type 2 diabetes. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #7 was moderately cognitively impaired and required practical assistance with shower transfer and toileting hygiene and maximal assistance with showering. The Resident Care Plan dated 11/10/23 identified Resident #7 had episodes of resistive to care- refused to shower, and refused to change clothes. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered, monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. A physician's order dated 11/13/23 directed to provide Ativan (Lorazepam) 0.5 milligrams (mg), give 1 tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,039 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $16,039 — penalty dated 2024-03-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $359K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT