Ark Healthcare & Rehabilitation At St. Camillus

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 87 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 117.2 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.481 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jdisputed · IDR2026-06-23 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation review, observation of facility video, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure a resident with dementia that was dependent for personal care and mobility and had no physician orders for opioids was free from exposure to opioids. The resident was identified unresponsive to verbal or tactile stimulation with pinpoint pupils, and was transferred to the hospital where he/she was diagnosed with suspected opioid intoxication, received Narcan, and had two (2) laboratory tests that were positive for opioids, resulting in a finding of Jeopardy. The findings include: Resident #1 had a diagnosis of vascular dementia and history of a stroke (CVA) with hemiparesis and hemiplegia (one sided weakness/paralysis). The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 indicating severely impaired cognition, and was dependent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility documentation, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure that staff provided the resident with the required assistance with bed mobility and as a result, Resident #1 fell out of bed and sustained a left femur (thigh bone) fracture. The finding includes: Resident #1 had diagnoses of Parkinson's, dementia, abnormalities of gait and mobility and generalized muscle weakness. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1's Brief Mental Interview (BIMS) score of six (6) indicative of severely impaired cognition, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, and was dependent with bed mobility and Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). A physician's order dated 8/29/24 directed to provide extensive assistance of 2 with bed mobility and 1/4 bed rails as an enabler, to assist with turning and repositioning. The care plan dated 9/10/24 identified Resident #1 at risk for ADL…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-06-23 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and facility documentation review for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from misappropriation of resident property. The findings include: Resident #1 had a diagnosis of vascular dementia. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 indicating severely impaired cognition. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/20/26 identified a self-care deficit. Interventions directed Resident #1 was non-ambulatory and dependent for wheelchair mobility, transfer with two (2) assist via mechanical lift, and provide personal care. Record review identified Resident #1 had no physician orders that directed administration of Risperdal (non-opioid medication used to treat bipolar), Trazadone (used to treat depression/not an opioid), Morphine (opioid medication used to treat pain or shortness of breath), or any opioids. Resident #2 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-06-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and facility documentation review for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure staff followed accepted medication administration practices administration practices. The findings include: Review of facility surveillance video identified on [DATE] at approximately 2:30 AM (3 hours and 30 minutes after her shift started), LPN #1 was observed to exit Resident #1's room, walk down the hallway toward the nursing station with her medication cart keys in her right hand and a black item the size of a cell phone in her left hand. LPN #1 went to the medication cart, placed the cell phone sized item on top of the left side of the med card and she unlocked the cart and placed her keys on top of the right side of the medication cart. Without unlocking or referring to the laptop on the medication cart (med cart) or the Medication Administration Record (MAR), LPN #1 then opened a large non-narcotic drawer and removed an item that appeared to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a tour of the Dietary Department, observations, review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews the facility failed to ensure food temperatures were consistently obtained and logged prior to serving meals, refrigerator and freezer temperatures were consistently monitored and documented, dishwasher temperatures were consistently monitored and documented prior to washing dishes, sanitizer solution was consistently tested and logged prior to use to disinfect pots and pans and kitchen surfaces per manufacturer recommendations, and dietary staff wore a beard guard when preparing and serving food. The findings include: A tour of the Dietary Department on 4/20/26 at 8:00 AM with the Food Service Director (FSD) identified the following:1. Food temperature for breakfast, lunch, and dinner meal log sheets for 2025 were not completed. 2. Refrigerator and freezer log sheets for 2025 were not completed. 3. Dishwasher temperature log sheets for 2025 were not completed.4. Sanitizer parts per million (PPM) log sheets for 2025 were not completed.Interview with the FSD on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-27 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record reviews, review of the facility Infection Control Program, facility documents facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to provide education regarding the Covid Vaccine to staff members offering to provide the vaccine or inform where staff could obtain a Covid vaccination, and the facility failed to ensure documentation of screening residents for the eligibility to receive the Covid vaccine was completed, and residents and responsible parties received copies of Covid Vaccination educational materials prior to deciding to vaccinate or decline vaccination. The findings include: An interview and facility document review with the Assistant Director of Nursing Services (ADNS/Infection Preventionist(IP) on 4/23/2026 at 10:15 AM identified she/he was unable to locate specific staff education regarding the Covid Vaccine and offering the vaccine or indicate where they could receive the vaccine. The Staff Development Nurse, RN#2 identified she/he provided staff training on the Covid infection and staff members roles within the facility as it pertains to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for dining, the facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience. The findings include:Resident #3 had diagnoses that included dementia and end-stage renal disease. The physician's order dated 3/1/26 directed a regular renal diet and thin liquids. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had severely impaired cognition and required setup or cleanup assistance for eating.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/19/26 identified Resident #3 was at risk for further decline in ADL self-care related to increased weakness, fatigue, and continuous deconditioning. Interventions included the use of adaptive equipment, built-up utensils, scoop plate, double- handled sippy cup, and assistance of one with eating.Observation on 4/22/26 at 8:50 AM noted Resident #3 seated in a wheelchair at a round table in the lounge while Nurse Aide (NA) #1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, review of facility policy and staff interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to keep the resident safe from physical and verbal abuse. The findings include:Resident #6 a conserved resident was admitted with diagnoses of bipolar disorder and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 had moderately impaired cognition and exhibited verbal behaviors directed towards others. Resident #6 required substantial/maximal assistance for toileting, was independent in standing from a sitting position, and used a wheelchair for mobility. The MDS assessment further identified Resident #6 did not have any skin problems or wounds.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/21/2025 identified Resident #6 was at risk for alteration in mood and behaviors as evidenced by yelling at staff. Interventions included leaving the resident alone and returning later if the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical records, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #21 and Resident# 117) reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), the facility failed to ensure the state agency was updated subsequent to the residents' new psychiatric diagnoses. The findings include:1. Resident #21 had diagnoses that included anxiety and dementia. a. A PASRR Level 1 screen dated 11/27/24 identified Resident #21 had a diagnosis of dementia with no mental health diagnosis and received a dementia exemption. The outcome identified Resident #21's approval remained valid unless changes occur or additional information suggests a primary mental health illness then rescreening should occur to reassess need for PASRR evaluation.A psychiatric Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) note dated 12/2/24 identified Resident #21 had diagnoses of anxiety and depression (new diagnoses for Resident #21).A physician's order dated 12/2/24 directed to administer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, review of facility policy and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to revise the resident plan of care regarding pressure ulcer interventions to prevent skin breakdown. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] diagnosis includes pneumonia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #1 was cognitively intact, was at risk for pressure ulcers, and had an unstageable deep tissue injury. The care plan (not dated) indicated Resident #1 had a pressure ulcer classified as a deep tissue injury (DTI) on the right buttock which was present on admission to the facility. Interventions included checking skin at least weekly, providing good nutrition and providing incontinent care. A Health Status Note dated 3/26/2026 at 12:17 PM identified during an observation of Resident # 1's left heel the heel was noted to be boggy with skin intact; no complaints of discomfort and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #23) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided and or offered showers. The findings include: Resident #23 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression and schizophrenia.The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #23 had moderately impaired cognition, had not exhibited refusal of care, and required moderate assistance with bathing. The MDS assessment further identified it was very important for the resident to choose her/his preferred bathing method including a shower, tub bath, bed bath, or sponge bath.The RCP dated 3/4/2026 identified Resident #23 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Interventions included providing supervision for bathing and dressing. An undated nurse aide care card also indicated the resident required supervision for bathing and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 4 Residents (Resident #52) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a therapeutic diet was provided with food items to meet the needs of the resident. The findings include: Resident #52's diagnoses included ulcerative colitis and diverticulitis.The physician's order dated 10/16/2025 directed a regular diet with regular texture, thin consistency, low fiber, and double portions/double protein with all meals.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #52 had intact cognition and was not on a therapeutic diet (despite the physician's order for a low fiber diet).The Resident Care Plan dated 4/28/2026 identified Resident #52 was at risk for malnutrition related to multiple chronic diseases and exacerbation of ulcerative colitis. Interventions included providing supplements as ordered, offering preferred foods, and serving the prescribed low fiber diet with double…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-07-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT