Woodlake At Tolland
26 Shenipsit Lake Road, Tolland, CT 06084 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 130 certified beds · (860) 872-2999 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.4% | 18.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.7% | 6.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.6% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 63.2% | 22.3% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.3% | 3.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.4% | 16.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.4% | 17.6% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.6% | 4.0% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.9% | 24.7% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.9% | 17.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.0% | 69.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.8% | 24.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.1% | 10.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.55 | 2.06 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.54 | 1.46 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 120 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 59.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.0%CMS range 39.7–60.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 7.8–15.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 59.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 59.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 40.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.4%CMS range 4.0–11.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.29 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 112.7 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.11 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.29 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2021-11-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of four residents (Resident #42) reviewed for activities of daily living, the facility failed ensure a dependent resident was provided with supervision to prevent an injury, and for one of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury (Resident #61) the facility failed to ensure provided wound care timely in accordance with physician orders. The findings include: a. Resident #42's diagnoses included Alzheimer's dementia and vascular dementia with behavioral disturbances. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #42 had severe cognitive impairment, rarely or never made decisions regarding tasks of daily life, required total assistance of two (2) staff with transferring in and out of the bed and chair, one (1) person assistance with movement to and from off-unit locations, was non-ambulatory and utilized a wheelchair (manual or electric) as a mobility device. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation/policies, and interviews, for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #117) reviewed for a change in condition, the facility failed to ensure timely provider notification of a significant change in condition, which resulted in a delay in medical intervention and subsequent transfer to the hospital. The findings include:Resident #117 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute on chronic heart failure (CHF), protein calorie malnutrition and malignant cancer of the colon.The Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #117 was alert to person, place, time and situation and required supervision for eating.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/16/25 identified Resident #117 had nutritional problems related to advanced age, altered nutrition labs, impaired skin, protein-calorie malnutrition and CHF. Interventions included to monitor/document/report any signs of dysphagia; pocketing, choking, coughing, drooling,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews for one of two sampled residents (Resident #94) reviewed for skin condition (skin tears), the facility failed to ensure Geri-sleeves were implemented to prevent recurrence of skin tears and for one sampled resident (Residents #54) with wandering and exit seeking behaviors, the facility failed to ensure the care plan addressed the resident's exit seeking and wandering behaviors. The findings include: Resident #94 had diagnoses that included dementia and anemia. The annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #94 had severe cognitive impairment and required total assistance with personal hygiene and dressing. The assessment further identified Resident #94 did not have the presence of skin tears. The accident and incident report dated 10/7/25 at 8:00 AM identified Resident #94 was noted with a skin tear to the left hand that measured 0.6 centimeters (cm) in length by 0.8 cm in width…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #116) observed with medication at the bedside, the facility failed to ensure that medications were not left at the resident's bedside for a resident who is without an order or assessment for self-administration of medication and the nursing supervisor (RN #3) observed sleeping on shift in view of the resident unit. The findings include:. The findings include: Observation on 2/10/26 at 4:55 AM identified RN #3 (Nursing Supervisor) in the supervisor's office on the 1st floor seated in a chair with his head bent down to his chest with his eyes closed. The office has two walls that are windows, and a door with windows, so that people outside of the office can see into the office. The lights were off and the door was slightly ajar. The laundry staff person (Laundry #1) pushed the door open and entered the room. Laundry Staff #1 called RN #3's name…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical records, review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #116), reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL), the facility failed to ensure a resident who requested assistance with ADL care received the care in a timely manner. The findings include: Resident #116 was admitted to facility in January of 2026 with diagnoses that included acute kidney failure, bacteremia, and nontraumatic subdural hemorrhage.The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #116 had intact cognition, required maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing, taking off footwear, lower body dressing, transfers and ambulation. The assessment further identified Resident #116 was frequently incontinent of bladder and always incontinent of bowel.The care plan dated 1/31/26 identified Resident #116 had potential for alteration in skin integrity relate to decrease mobility, activity in tolerance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation/policies, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) records, and interviews, for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #117) reviewed for a change in condition, the facility failed to recognize and respond appropriately to an acute change in condition and failed to ensure staff remained with the resident during a medical emergency until EMS assumed care. Resident #117 was found by EMS in respiratory distress without staff present, with severe hypoxia (dangerously low oxygen levels in the body), and was subsequently hospitalized . The findings include:Resident #117 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute on chronic heart failure (CHF), protein calorie malnutrition and malignant cancer of the colon.The Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #117 was alert to person, place, time and situation and required supervision for eating.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/16/25 identified Resident #117 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, review of facility policy and procedures and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #29) reviewed for limited range of motion, the facility failed to ensure splints were applied according to the wearing schedule as ordered by the physician. The findings include: Resident #29 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with agitation, non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of left foot limited to breakdown of skin, hydrocephalus and poly-osteoarthritis. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #29 had severely impaired cognition, exhibited bilateral upper extremity impairment, no impairment of the lower extremities, was dependent with all self-care and mobility and was not receiving therapy services. Physician's orders dated 1/27/26 directed the following splinting devices:Bilateral upper extremity palm guards to maintain skin integrity and contracture…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and procedure, and interviews, for two of eight sampled residents (Residents #54 and Resident #110) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure an elopement risk assessment was completed per facility policy and facility failed to ensure a resident wearing a wander guard device was functioning and transmitting to alert staff when triggered and for one of three sample residents (Resident #11) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the staff follow the resident care plan to prevent a fall. The findings include:Resident #54 was admitted to the facility in August of 2025 with diagnoses that included anemia, chronic kidney disease and dementia. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #54 had moderately impaired cognition, had behaviors, required maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, personal hygiene, wheeling of the manual wheelchair 50 feet and make two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for 1 of 8 sampled residents (Resident #95) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure quarterly nutrition assessments were completed. The findings included: Resident #95's diagnoses included Type II diabetes, Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) with esophagitis, Barretts esophagus without dysplasia. The care plan dated 4/10/25 identified Resident #95 was at risk for a nutrition problem related to Type 2 Diabetes, GERD, intestinal malabsorption, prostate cancer, hypertension, coronary artery disease, Barretts esophagus with interventions that included diet consult as needed, honor food preferences as they arise, monitor weights monthly, registered dietician to evaluate and make diet changes and recommendations as needed. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #95 was moderately cognitively impaired, was independent for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating and personal hygiene.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for the facility reviewed for medication storage the facility failed to ensure there was a system of receipt and disposition to accurately ensure reconciliation of controlled substances received into the facility. The findings included:Interview with the nursing supervisor, RN #3 on 2/10/26 at 5:26 AM identified that when controlled substances come into the facility they are inventoried by the receiving nurse, verified and signed by a second nurse, and the controlled substance disposition record (CSDR) gets photocopied and the copy goes to the ADNS and the original goes with the medication on the medication cart.Interview with the ADNS on 2/11/26 at 10:37 AM identified she had been the ADNS for a year at this facility. The ADNS indicated that when the copies of the CSDR comes into her office they are placed in a binder. The ADNS identified that once a medication is zeroed out the original sign off CSDR is brought to the ADNS office and placed in the binder and the copy is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 3 sampled medication rooms and observation of medication administration, the facility failed to store medications appropriately. The findings include: Observation on [DATE] at 9:18AM identified a bottle of Fluticasone 50mcg nasal spray approximately 1/3 full for Resident #39 and a Tresiba Flex Touch Insulin degludec injection with 100 units remaining on top of a medication cart with 12 units dialed into the pen for Resident #31 in the Rehab unit. No nurse was attending the cart at the time and later it was identified the nurse was down the hall in a resident's room without eyes on the medication. This medication was observed to be unattended for approximately 4 minutes before the nurse returned to the cart. Interview on [DATE] at 9:10AM with LPN#5 identified she was nurse assigned to this medication cart and she was down in a resident's room and had left these two medications out on top of the cart because they were the last two medications to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 39 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews, facility policy review, and interviews for two of six sampled residents (Resident #8 & #90) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure the adaptive equipment (two handled cup) was implemented in accordance with the physician's orders. The findings include: Resident #90's with diagnoses that included dementia, multiple sclerosis, and primary generalized osteoarthritis. The occupational therapy evaluation and plan of treatment from 3/14/25 to 6/11/25 identified Resident #90 was evaluated for difficulties with the regular cup related to fine motor deficit. The resident goal identified Resident #90 would be able to utilize a two handled mug for all liquid to increase performance and independence with self-feeding and increase fluid intake. The physician's order dated 3/21/25 identified Resident #90 directed to use two handled mug with straw during all meals. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #90 had severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for 3 sample residents (Resident #90, Resident #92, and Resident #94) reviewed for infection surveillance, the facility failed to maintain a system to track a Multi-Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO) infection to the other healthcare provider upon transfer. The findings include: Review of facility MDRO line listing tracking form identified Resident #90 had a history of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) to a wound that was identified on 12/10/21. Resident #90's diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, dementia, and anxiety. The resident medical diagnoses failed to identify the MRSA to a wound. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #94 identified severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assist with toileting, personal hygiene, dressing, and transfer. Review of facility MDRO line listing tracking form identified Resident #92 had a history of Extended Spectrum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy/procedure, and interviews for 2 of 3 nurse aides (NA #12 and #13), the facility failed to complete the required annual in-service training. Review of NA#12's personnel file identified that she was hired on 2/9/09 and failed to identify documentation that Abuse Neglect and Exploitation, Resident Rights, Dementia Care, and Infection Control training was completed for 2024. The two trainings able to view for 2024 were Communication and Behavioral Health. Review of NA#13's personnel file identified that she was hired on 11/7/24 and failed to identify documentation that Dementia Care, Behavioral Health, and Communication training was completed for 2025. The training completed for 2025 was Abuse Neglect and Exploitation, Resident Rights, and Infection control. Review of the training schedule identified each month there are scheduled training that should be completed for the facility. Interview on 2/13/26 at 3:52PM with the Staff Development Nurse (RN #11) identified she was recently hired as the staff development nurse at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure staff did not move a resident with identified changes in mental status after a witnessed a fall with a head injury. The findings include: Physician order dated [DATE] directed independent with mobility in the room and hallways using a rollator (rolling walker). The Nurse Aide (NA) Kardex/care card directed as of [DATE], Resident #1 was independent with transfers and ambulation with a rolling walker. Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia, heart failure and insomnia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment and ambulated with partial assistance. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated [DATE] identified a risk for falls. Interventions directed to encourage call bell use for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility documentation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure opened refrigerator items were dated and discarded, per the facility policy, spoiled food products were discarded, frozen food items were covered, and beverage items were stored in a sanitary manner. The findings include: 1. During an initial tour of the facility kitchen on 3/24/24 at 7:10 AM with the Dietary Director, the following were identified: a. Observation of the reach-in refrigerator identified 4 opened Lactaid cartons without the benefit of an open date label and 1 carton of tomato juice, with an open date of 3/9/24. Interview during the tour with the Dietary Director identified that all opened containers should be labeled with an open date to ensure there is no guessing when the containers were opened or when they should be discarded. The Dietary Director indicated that it is the responsibility of the person who opened the container to create an open date label. The Dietary Director further indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and interviews for one of two sampled residents (Resident #68) reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's rights were honored during a meal. The findings include: Resident # 68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy, hypothermia, and congestive heart failure. The care card dated 3/16/24 identified Resident #68 was independent with feeding. The care plan dated 3/18/23 identified Resident #68 was newly admitted to the facility. Interventions included involving the resident in decision making regarding care. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 68 had intact cognition, was occasionally incontinent of bowel, frequently incontinent of bladder, required partial assistance with toileting and bathing, and was independent with eating. Interview and observation on 3/24/24 at 8:25 AM identified Resident #68's breakfast meal tray set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation and interviews for 1 sampled resident (Resident #75) reviewed for edema, the facility failed to ensure APRN or physician were notified that weights were not obtained per physician order. The findings include: Resident #75 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included edema, congestive heart failure, and dementia. A physician's order dated 9/22/23 directed to complete a daily weight in the morning. Notify the provider for a weight gain greater than 2 lbs. in 1 day and 5 lbs. in a week. The care plan dated 9/22/23 identified congestive heart failure. Interventions directed to complete a daily weight in the morning. Notify the provider for a weight gain greater than 2 lbs. in 1 day and 5 lbs. in a week and give medications per physician order. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #75 had moderately impaired cognition, was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, and interviews, for one sampled resident( Resident #69) reviewed for an allegation of staff to resident abuse, the facility failed to implement policies to protect the resident's from abuse. The finding includes: Resident #69 was admitted [DATE] with diagnosis which included unspecified dementia with psychotic disturbances, emphysema/COPD, and depression. Facility documentation dated 8/22/22 identified Resident #69 believed NA #1 was making a joke about the resident being moved off of the unit by singing the song Celebration. Resident #69 notified his/her spouse of the situation, stated NA #1 was rude, sang Celebration and was delighted about the move. The spouse was visibly upset and expressed concerns to management regarding the treatment. NA #1 was sent home immediately pending investigation. Interview and review of the incident with NA #1 on 03/25/24 at 11:10AM identified her recall of the incident was Resident #69 was either being discharged or moved to another…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #75) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed related to the use of respiratory equipment. The findings include: Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary edema, dementia, and obstructive sleep apnea. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #75 had moderately impaired cognition, was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. Additionally, the MDS assessment did not indicate the use of a C-pap. The baseline care plan dated 10/4/23 did not identify the use of a C-pap. The comprehensive care plan dated 10/10/23 did not identify diagnosis of sleep apnea or the use of the CPAP. The physician's orders dated 1/20/24 (120 days after admission)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, and interviews for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #47) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the neurological assessment was completed per policy after an unwitnessed fall with injury and, and for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #84) reviewed for behaviors, the facility failed to ensure behavior observation and monitoring was provided for a resident that required 1:1 constant supervision. The findings include: 1. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis which included dementia, diabetes, and difficulty in walking. The care plan dated 8/31/23 identified multiple falls. Interventions included dycem to wheelchair, offer toileting after lunch and before end of 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM, and encourage participation in activities. Resident #47 was non ambulatory and uses a mechanical lift for transfers. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #47 had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility documentation, facility policy and interview for 1 resident ( Resident #12) reviewed for bowel protocols, the facility failed to follow its policy to assist a resident in maintaining bowel function. The findings include: Resident # 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, dysphagia, and unspecified convulsions. The annual MDS assesssment dated 2/18/24 identified Resident # 12 had moderately impaired cognition, was wheelchair dependent and incontinent of both bowel and bladder. The care plan dated 2/27/24 identified a focus on constipation with interventions that included follow facility protocol for bowel management. A physician's order dated 3/1/24 directed to administer Milk of Magnesia (laxative) 30 ml every 24 hours as needed for constipation and give Miralax 17 grams (laxative) by mouth daily as needed for no bowel movement in 3 shifts (mix with 120 ml of water, tea, juice or coffee), and Bisacodyl suppository 10mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #19) reviewed for choices, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's prescribed diet was followed per the physician's order. The findings include: Resident # 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute metabolic acidosis, chronic kidney disease, and ileostomy. The physician's orders dated 3/10/24 identified Resident #19 required a renal diet and Lokelma (a medication used to treat high potassium levels) 10 gram packet by mouth twice daily. The care plan dated 3/12/24 identified Resident #19 was at risk for nutritional problems due to multiple chronic diseases and the need for a therapeutic diet. Interventions included to provide and serve a renal diet as ordered. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 19 had intact cognition, was continent of bladder and bowel with ileostomy, and required a therapeutic diet. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #5, #75) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was cleaned, changed, and stored per policy and manufacturer's recommendations (for 189 days). The findings include: 1. Resident # 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included COPD, centrilobular emphysema, and diabetes type 2. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 5 had intact cognition, utilized a walker and wheelchair for mobility, and was on oxygen therapy. The care plan dated 12/22/23 identified a focus on emphysema/COPD with interventions that included oxygen settings via nasal cannula as ordered. A physician's order dated 3/10/24 directed to apply oxygen at 2-3 liters per minute via nasal cannula to keep oxygen saturation level greater than 88% ever shift for COPD, oxygen dependent. Observations on 03/24/24 08:32 AM identified no date on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, and interviews for 1 sampled (Resident #88) reviewed for catheters, the facility failed to ensure there the nursing staff were competent to care for specialized medical equipment. The findings include: Resident #88 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included dementia, chronic cholecystitis, and hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculus obstruction. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #88 had severely impaired cognition and has a indwelling Foley catheter for urine and a colostomy for bowels. Resident #88 requires total assistance for dressing, toileting, showering, and personal hygiene. A physician's order dated 2/19/24 directed to apply bacitracin to JP( Jackson Pratt drain is a surgical suction drain that draws fluid from a wound following surgery) drain site in right lower quadrant and cover with a dry clean dressing daily and as needed. Document on wound bed, odor, drainage,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation and facility policy, for one of six residents ( Resident #12 ) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the pharmacy failed to identify a non-crushable medication as a do not crush. The findings include: Resident # 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, dysphagia, and unspecified convulsions. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #12 had moderately impaired cognition, was wheelchair dependent and incontinent of both bowel and bladder. The care plan dated 2/27/24 identified long term use of antipsychotics related to schizoaffective disorder and the presence of drug induced tremors. Interventions included to monitor, document and report as needed adverse reactions to psychotropic medications, tardive dyskinesia, or drug induced movement disorders such as shuffling gait, rigid muscles, or shaking. A physician's order dated 3/1/24 directed to provide the following medications:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation and facility policy for one resident (Resident #12) reviewed for blood sugar monitoring, the facility failed to monitor blood sugars according to professional standards of care. The findings include: Resident # 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, dysphagia, and diabetes type 2. The annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #12 had moderately impaired cognition, was wheelchair dependent and incontinent of both bowel and bladder. The care plan dated 2/27/24 identified a diagnosis of diabetes which is controlled with diet and oral meds with interventions that included oral medication as ordered, and monitor labs as ordered. The clinical record identified labs drawn on 10/20/23 identified glucose level of 51 mg/dl (normal range 74-100mg/dl) resulting in no new orders. The clinical record identified the last blood sugar documented was on 11/28/23 with a reading of 87…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and interviews for one of five residents (Resident #84) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure targeted behaviors were identified and monitored for a resident receiving psychotropic medications. The findings include: Resident # 84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia with agitation, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and anxiety. The physician's orders dated 3/13/24 directed to administer Quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication) 25 mg twice daily for dementia with agitation; Lexapro 20 mg (an antidepressant medication) for depression, and Trazadone (an antidepressant medication) 25mg at bedtime for insomnia. Review of the clinical record failed to identify any orders or documentation related to targeted behavior monitoring for Resident #84 following admission to the facility on 3/13/24. The care plan dated 3/14/24 identified Resident #84 was at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #88) reviewed for catheters, the facility failed to ensure there the medial equipment was maintained in a sanitary manner and for one sampled resident (Resident #91) reviewed for transmission-based precautions, the facility failed to ensure transmission based precautions were maintained for a resident with a infection; and for 2 sampled residents reviewed for infection control (Resident #311 and Resident #312), the facility failed to ensure shared medical equipment was sanitized between use on residents. The findings include: Resident #88 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included dementia, chronic cholecystitis, and hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculous obstruction. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #88 had severely impaired cognition and has a indwelling Foley catheter for urine and a colostomy for bowels. Resident #88…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #74) reviewed for immunization status, the facility failed to provide the pneumococcal immunization. The findings include: Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #74's immunization record identified he/she received PCV (Prevnar) 13 on 9/26/13. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #74 had severely impaired cognition and was not up to date with the Pneumococcal vaccination. The quarterly MDS assessment failed to indicate a reason that the Pneumococcal vaccine was not received. Interview and clinical record review with the Infection Control Nurse (RN #3) on 3/25/24 at 11:52 AM failed to identify Resident #74 had received a Pneumococcal vaccination since 2013. RN #3 indicated that she had begun working as the Infection Control Nurse in November of 2023 and was unsure if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #161) reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to ensure the final summary of the resident's stay included the resident's skin integrity, including consultation by the wound physician, and the facility failed to ensure the respiratory equipment was delivered to the resident's home prior to discharge. The findings include: Resident #161 was admitted to the facility in December 2023 with diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes, and atrial fibrillation. The physician's order dated 12/27/23 directed to administer oxygen at 2 Liters via nasal cannula continuously every shift The nursing evaluation dated 12/27/23 at 10:51 PM identified Resident #161 was admitted with bruising to top of scalp, bruising to upper middle back, bruising to right elbow, bruising to left hip area, skin tear to left elbow and the use of Oxygen at 1.5 Liters. The care plan dated 12/27/23 identified Resident #161 has altered respiratory status related to acute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-11-02 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and staff interviews for facility review of dining, the facility failed to ensure sufficient dining staff to ensure meals were provided within the scheduled times, and the facility failed to steam table food temperatures were maintained and served at holding temperatures, and for one sampled resident (Resident #115) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure residents who require insulin injections with meals receive their meals timely. The findings included: Review of facility documentation identified the scheduled meal times were: Rehab unit - 8:15 AM, 11:45 AM and 4:45 PM; Main floor - 8:15 AM, 12 noon and 5 PM; and the Second floor - 8:15 AM, 12:30 PM and 5:30 PM. a. Resident # 56's diagnoses included spinal stenosis, depression and HTN. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified intact cognition and could eat independently. Resident #56's room was located on the Main floor. Interview with Resident #56 on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-02 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility documentation review and interviews for facility Resident Council review, the facility failed to ensure staff acted upon resident council concerns timely. The findings include: A resident council meeting was conducted on 10/5/2021 at 9:00 AM with nine (9) representatives of the resident council in attendance. Residents attending identified grievances were voiced during resident council meetings regarding call-bell response time on all shifts, staff not introducing themselves when providing resident care, staff loud in the halls during shift change, snacks not provided, and staff not walking residents on the weekends. Residents further indicated that they had consistently reported the above issues to the nursing staff, the issues had not been addressed, and no changes had occurred. Review of the Resident Council minutes from 9/21/2020 to 6/15/2021 identified that Resident Council members voiced grievances regarding long call-bell response time on 9/21 and 10/19/2020, and on 1/18 and 6/15/2021 (4 times). Further review identified grievances were voiced regarding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for dietary review, the facility failed to ensure food temperatures were maintained at accepted temperatures. The findings include: During an interview with Resident #56 on 10/4/2021 11:04 AM, Resident #56 indicated that hot foods are served cold. Interview with Resident #43 on 10/4/2021 at 3 PM identified the food is cold. Observation of point of service dining (steam table) of the first floor on 10/06/2021 at 12:40 PM identified a steam cart in the hallway outside of the dining room was plugged into the wall. Dietary Aide (DA) #1 and DA #2 were portioning food onto uninsulated plates with covers and placing them on a uninsulated rolling cart. NA #4 and NA #7 were delivering food to residents directly from the steam cart and while the NA #4 and NA #7 were delivering food, DA #1 and DA #2 prepared additional plates with food and left the plates (with food) on either the side of the steam cart or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-02 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility documentation review, facility policy review and staff interviews for one sampled residents (Resident #56) for facility review of dining, the facility failed to ensure snacks were offered, and for facility review of meals, the facility failed to ensure substantial evening snacks were offered when the breakfast meal was more than 14 hours after the evening meal. The findings included: a. Resident #56 had diagnoses that included iron deficiency anemia and vitamin deficiency. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #56 was alert and oriented, was able to eat independently, and had no weight loss/gain. The Resident Care plan dated 8/9/2021 identified a problem of high nutrition risk related to depression and insidious weight loss and anemia. Interventions directed to provide nourishments, snacks and fluids. The physician's orders dated 8/2/2021 identified to offer a snack at 8 PM (resident likes peanut butter and jelly sandwich on wheat) in the evening. Interview with Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for two sampled residents (Resident #104 and #223) reviewed for advance directives, the facility failed to ensure the advance directives were completed timely. The findings include: a. Resident #104 was admitted to the facility during 8/2021 with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbance. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #104 had severely impaired cognition and required total dependence with personal hygiene and one physical assist. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated [DATE] identified Resident #104 had impaired cognition. Interventions directed communicate with the resident/family regarding resident's needs. Review of the clinical record identified Resident #104 had a Power of Attorney (POA) for health care decisions. Additional review of the physician's orders from 8/18 through [DATE] failed to identify an order to direct the resident's code status (advanced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and staff interviews for one sampled resident (Resident # 42) reviewed for personal property, the facility failed to ensure reported missing items were included on the facility missing item form, and the facility failed to ensure the missing item form resolution was identified. The findings included: Resident #42 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's and vascular Dementia with behavioral disturbance. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] identified severe cognitive impairment and did not walk. Review of the missing item form completed by Social Worker #1, dated 4/13/2021 at 2 PM identified a Resident #42's responsible party (Person #1) reported a painting was missing. Additionally, the report identified Person #1 noted the painting missing on 3/11/2021 and it was last seen prior to COVID-19 pandemic. The report indicated all departments were notified, and multiple room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-02 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, and interviews for two of three residents (Resident #47 and #72) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman timely when the resident was transferred to the hospital. The findings include: a. Resident #47 had diagnoses that included emphysema and transient cerebral ischemic attack. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #47 had severely impaired cognition and required total dependence with personal hygiene. Clinical record review identified that on 7/14/2021, Resident #47 was discharged from the facility and admitted to the hospital and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The social service note dated 7/20/2021 at 9:24 AM identified Resident #47 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital with a diagnoses of a urinary tract infection, and social services will provide support as needed. A nurse's note dated 8/5/2021 at 7:46 PM identified Resident #47 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-02 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and interviews for three of six residents (Residents #5, 6, and 7), reviewed for resident assessments, the facility failed to transmit the residents Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in a timely manner. The findings include: a. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sprain of left foot and depressive disorder. Resident #5's admission MDS had an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/12/2021. The MDS, section Z0500B was signed as completed on 6/6/2021; the MDS was signed completed 26 days after the ARD (13 days after the required 14-day completion). b. Resident #6's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Resident #6's quarterly MDS had an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/4/2021. The MDS, section Z0500B was signed as completed on 4/11/2021; the MDS was signed completed 39 days after the ARD (19 days after the required 14-day completion). Additional review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-02 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of six residents (Resident #4) reviewed for resident assessments, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was transmitted timely, and the facility failed to ensure a discharge assessment was completed timely. The findings include: Resident #4's diagnoses included diabetes and chronic atrial fibrillation. Clinical record review identified Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission MDS assessment had an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/8/2021. The MDS section Z0500B was signed as completed on 5/17/2021 (day 10 after the ARD), and the MDS was due to be transmitted by day 14 after the MDS completion date (due by 5/30/2021). Facility documentation review identified the MDS was transmitted on 6/9/21; the MDS was transmitted eleven (11) days late (11 days after the date of 5/30/2021 due to transmit). Additional clinical record review and facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facilty documentation review and facility policy review for one of four Residents (Resident #38) reviewed for activities of daily living, the facility failed to ensure showers were provided according to resident preference. The findings included: Resident #38 was admitted with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation and a history of falls. The quarterly minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] identified impaired cognition and Resident #38 required assistance of one person with personal hygiene. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 8/24/2021 identified a problem with activities of daily living secondary to a shoulder fracture and osteoarthritis. Interventions directed assist of person for dressing and bathing and to assist Resident #38 with showers every Monday on the day shift. The physician orders dated 8/24/2021 directed to conduct a weekly skin audit on shower day every Monday. The Nurse Aide Patient Care Card directed to give Resident #38 a shower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy review, and staff interviews for one of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure a consultant physician recommendation for a resident with a pressure ulcer was acted upon timely. The findings included: Resident #95 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, Type 2 diabetes, and HTN. The quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #95 had severe cognitive impairment, was dependent on two (2) staff for bed mobility and transfers, was at risk for pressure ulcer development and had one stage III pressure ulcer. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 9/4/2021 identified Resident #95 had a potential/actual impairment to skin integrity. Interventions directed to monitor skin daily with care, administer treatments as ordered and report improvements and declines to the physician. Review of the clinical record identified Resident #95 was followed by a wound physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews for one of two residents (Resident # 95) reviewed for position and mobility, the facility failed to ensure a splint was applied in accordance with physician ' s orders. The findings included: Resident #95 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, Type 2 diabetes, and HTN. The quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #95 had severe cognitive impairment and had limited range of motion of his/her bilateral upper and lower extremities and did not wear orthotics. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 9/4/2021 identified Resident #95 had a problem of left hand and digit extension contractures, bilateral elbow contractures, and bilateral ankle contractures. Interventions directed to apply orthotics as ordered and monitor contractures for worsening and conduct PT or OT screen as needed for changes. The physician orders dated 7/25/2021 directed to apply a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, and interviews for one of five residents (Resident #104) reviewed for unnecessary meds, the facility failed to ensure an the pharmacist recommendation was acted upon timely. The findings include: Resident #104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbance. A physician's order dated 8/18/21 directed to administer Quetiapine Fumarate (Seroquel), an antipsychotic medication, 12.5 milligrams (mg) tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed for agitation related to dementia with behavioral disturbance. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #104 had severely impaired cognition and required total dependence with personal hygiene and received an antipsychotic medication seven out of the last seven days. The care plan dated 8/26/2021 identified Resident #104 used psychotropic medications. Interventions directed to administer psychotropic medications as ordered by physician. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based review of the clinical record and interviews for one of five residents (Resident #104) reviewed for unnecessary meds, the facility failed to ensure an as needed (prn) antipsychotic medication was limited to 14 days. The findings include: Resident #104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbance. A physician's order dated 8/18/21 directed to administer Quetiapine Fumarate (Seroquel), an antipsychotic medication, 12.5 milligrams (mg) tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed for agitation related to dementia with behavioral disturbance. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #104 had severely impaired cognition and required total dependence with personal hygiene and received an antipsychotic medication seven out of the last seven days. The care plan dated 8/26/2021 identified Resident #104 used psychotropic medications. Interventions directed to administer psychotropic medications as ordered by physician. Review of the physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of facility documentation, facility policy review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate record of the temperatures for the dishwasher, the freezer and the refrigerator. The findings include: a. Building Fire Safety Inspection (BFSI) tour of the kitchen on 10/6/2021 at approximately 10:30 AM with the Maintenance Director identified the October 2021 dishwashing machine temperature record log had been completed for the dates of 10/1/21 through 10/6/21 for breakfast and dinner. The log failed to reflect that the dishwasher temperatures were recorded for the noon meal on 10/4 and 10/5/2021. b. Review of the freezer and refrigerator temperature form for the month of August 2021 identified the freezer and refrigerator temperature form failed to reflect documentations for 8/27, 8/28, and 8/29/2021. Further, the facility was unable to provide the September 2021 freezer and refrigerator temperature form for review; the form was not available. Interview with the Food Service Director (FSD) on 10/6/2021 at 12:40 PM identified she was not aware…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one resident (Resident # 70) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing were changed timely in accordance with the physician's order, and for facility infection control review, the facility failed to ensure meal trays removed from resident rooms were not placed on top of the clean linen cart. The findings include: a. Resident #70's diagnoses included COPD, chronic respiratory failure and emphysema. Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 7/2/21 identified Resident #70 had an altered respiratory status/difficulty breathing related to asthma, COPD and oxygen use. Interventions directed to administer oxygen as ordered. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified that R #70 was alert and oriented and used oxygen. The Physician's order dated 8/2/2021 directed to administer oxygen at two (2) liters a minute (l/m) via a nasal canula, and to change…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical records, review of facility documentation and interviews for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #28 and 46), reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to ensure the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified when the residents were transferred to the hospital. The findings include. 1. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility in September 2022 with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid severe obesity, congestive heart failure, and asthma. Review of the census list form dated 9/9/23 identified Resident #28 was transferred to the hospital. The nurse's note dated 9/11/23 at 6:50 PM identified Resident #28 was readmitted to the facility. Review of the Admit/Discharge Report dated 9/1/23 failed to reflect that the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman had been notified when Resident #28 was transferred to the hospital on 9/9/23. 2. Resident #46 was admitted to the facility in October 2023 with diagnoses which included diabetes, asthma, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-03-26 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, and interviews for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #24, Resident #28 and Resident #46) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice to the resident or resident representative. The findings include: 1. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility in December 2022 with diagnoses which included anxiety disorder, pneumonia, and acute respiratory failure. A nurses note of 2/19/24 identified Resident #24 experienced altered mental status, and was sent to the hospital for evaluation on 2/19/24. Resident #24 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy and pneumonia. Review of the clinical record failed to reflect a bed hold notice had been provided to the resident or resident representative upon the resident transfer to the hospital on 2/23/24. 2. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility in September 2022 with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2021-11-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespreadSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation and interviews for five resident (Resident #42, #95, #98, #99 and #424) records reviewed, the facility failed ensure the clinical records were complete and accurate. The findings include: a. Resident #42's diagnoses included Alzheimer's dementia and vascular dementia with behavioral disturbances. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #42 had severe cognitive impairment, rarely or never made decisions regarding tasks of daily life, required total assistance of two (2) staff with transferring in and out of the bed and chair, one (1) person assistance with movement to and from off-unit locations, was non-ambulatory and utilized a wheelchair (manual or electric) as a mobility device. The Resident Care Plan dated 5/13/2021 identified Resident #42 was at risk for skin breakdown related to depression, history of falling, cervical spondylosis, osteoarthritis. Interventions directed to monitor skin integrity during care.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHAKOW, RACHEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 91% | since 07/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 1 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CT
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075382. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.