New London Sub-Acute And Nursing
90 Clark Lane, Waterford, CT 06385 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (860) 442-0471 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603, F0610) — most recent Apr 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0570)
- inspectors cited 7 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (83) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $180,374 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-22)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.4% | 18.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.3% | 6.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 18.8% | 22.3% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.0% | 3.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.8% | 16.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.4% | 17.6% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.0% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.6% | 4.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.9% | 24.7% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 24.9% | 17.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.9% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.7% | 69.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 16.3% | 24.3% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.1% | 10.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.73 | 2.06 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.82 | 1.46 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 82 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 45.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.0%CMS range 41.7–62.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 6.7–13.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 45.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 35.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 58.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 4.0–12.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.02 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 96.1 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
83 citations, most serious first. The 20 most serious are shown; the remaining 63 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited beforedisputed · IIDR2026-04-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policies, and staff interviews, for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #8), the facility failed to protect a resident from abuse when staff failed to implement interventions for a roommate (Resident #7) with known, escalating aggressive and delusional behaviors, resulting in Immediate Jeopardy to resident health and safety. Specifically, despite documented behavioral episodes beginning on 4/3/26 - including agitation, yelling, paranoia, combativeness, and medication refusals - the facility failed to develop a behavior care plan or a care plan addressing medication refusals for Resident #7. On 4/15/26 and 4/16/26, staff failed to administer a prescribed PRN medication (trazodone 25 mg) for documented agitation and behavioral symptoms, failed to reattempt medication administration following refusal, and failed to implement alternative non-pharmacological interventions. On 4/16/26 at approximately 3:00 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited beforedisputed · IIDR2026-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for two (2) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident #1 and #2) reviewed for accident hazards, the facility failed to ensure residents received altered texture diets consistent with physician's orders and International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) guidelines and were provided supervision during meals as required for residents with dysphagia, creating a choking hazard. Specifically, on 3/19/26 at approximately 1:00 PM, Resident #1, who had diagnoses of dementia and dysphagia who required supervision during meals and was ordered an IDDSI Level 6 diet, was served and consumed a peanut butter and jelly sandwich that was not ordered and not consistent with the prescribed diet. Resident #1 began choking, was observed to be red in the face and unable to breathe and required the Heimlich maneuver to be performed to expel the obstructing food. Upon further observation, Resident #1 was feeding him/herself in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for three (3) of seven (7) sampled residents (Residents #1, #2 and #6) who were reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure the residents received scheduled anti-anxiety medication, narcotic pain medication, or both for agitation and comfort as prescribed by the physician. The failures resulted in the finding of Immediate Jeopardy. The findings include:1. Resident #1's diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the ovaries, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety, delusional disorders, restlessness and agitation and depressive disorder. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of zero (0) out of fifteen (15) indicating memory recall deficits. The Resident Care Plan dated 4/28/25 identified Resident #1 received hospice services for a diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Interventions directed to administer medications per the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited beforedisputed · IIDR2025-06-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for eleven (11) of thirteen (13) residents (Resident #1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13 and 14) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure that diabetic, cardiac, anti-seizure, pain and behavioral medications were administered timely per physician's orders. These failures resulted in a finding of Immediate Jeopardy. The findings include:1. Resident #1 's diagnoses included epilepsy, type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcers, osteomyelitis (an infection in the bone) and atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat).The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severely impaired cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5), required moderate assistance for eating, substantial assistance for bed mobility and was dependent on staff for transfers.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/19/2024 identified Resident #1 had diabetes mellitus, pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-03-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical records, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 22 of 40 residents (Resident #3, Resident #9, Resident #12, Resident #18, Resident #27, Resident #31, Resident #33, Resident #42, Resident #45, Resident #49, Resident #56, Resident #59, Resident #61, Resident #63, Resident #67, Resident #68, Resident #69, Resident #72, Resident # 74, Resident #78, Resident #81, Resident #92) reviewed during a tour of the secured memory unit, the facility failed to ensure the 5 Rights of medication administration, and professional standards of practice, were adhered to during the administration of medications. These failures resulted in the finding of Immediate Jeopardy. The findings include: 1. Resident #3's diagnoses included severe protein calorie malnutrition, cerebral infarction, and anxiety disorder. A physician's order dated 12/18/24 directed to administer Clopidogrel Bisulfate (antiplatelet) 75 milligrams (mg) orally once a day, Escitalopram Oxalate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical records, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 22 of 40 residents (Resident #3, Resident #9, Resident #12, Resident #18, Resident #27, Resident #31, Resident #33, Resident #42, Resident #45, Resident #49, Resident #56, Resident #59, Resident #61, Resident #63, Resident #67, Resident #68, Resident #69, Resident #72, Resident # 74, Resident #78, Resident #81, Resident #92) reviewed during a tour of the secured memory unit, the facility failed to ensure safe medication administration practices during the morning medication pass. These failures resulted in the finding of Immediate Jeopardy. Additionally, based on observations, interviews, review of the clinical record and facility policy for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #52) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to conduct reweights according to the facility policy. The findings include: 1. a. Resident #3's diagnoses included severe protein calorie malnutrition, cerebral infarction, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and facility policy for 1 of 6 residents, (Resident #43) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse, failed to remove the staff member from the schedule following the allegation, and once the allegation was substantiated by the State Agency again failed to remove the staff member from the schedule to ensure the residents were protected from abuse. These failures resulted in the finding of Immediate Jeopardy. The findings include: Resident #43's diagnoses included dementia, personality disorder, and hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #43 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment, did not experience episodes of delusions, and required maximal assistance for his/her toileting hygiene and chair to bed and bed to chair transfers. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation/policies, and interviews, for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from accident hazards when a bathroom grab bar used for transfers dislodged from the wall, resulting in a fall and subsequent rib fractures. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included history of falls, heart failure, and anxiety.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12), was independent with care, transfers, and wheelchair use. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/12/25 identified Resident #1 had limited physical mobility and was at risk of falls. Interventions included staff assistance with daily care as needed, provide urinal for use at night, call bell within reach, and use of non-skid socks.A Nurse's note by RN #2 (the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM supervisor)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of seven (7) sampled residents (Residents #1) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to follow up with the pharmacy services to ensure new medication orders were filled and standing orders were refilled prior to exhausting the supply. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the ovaries, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety, delusional disorders, restlessness and agitation and depressive disorder. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of zero (0) out of fifteen (15) indicating memory recall deficits. The Resident Care Plan dated 4/28/25 identified Resident #1 received hospice services for a diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Interventions directed to administer medications per the physician's orders. A physician's order dated 6/26/25 directed to administer morphine sulfate oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, clinical record reviews, facility documentation, and facility policy for 3 of 6 sampled residents, (Resident #43, Resident #42, and Resident #84) reviewed for abuse, for Resident #43, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse by staff, and for Resident #42 and Resident #84, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by a resident. The findings include: 1. Resident #43's diagnoses included dementia, personality disorder, and hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #43 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment, did not experience episodes of delusions, and required maximal assistance for his/her toileting hygiene and chair to bed and bed to chair transfers. The MDS further indicated that Resident #43 did not reject evaluations of care including Activity of Daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents #1 and #7) reviewed for accidents and incidents, the facility failed to ensure timely physician notification following significant changes in resident condition and behavioral incidents requiring medical and psychiatric evaluation. For Resident #1, the facility failed to notify the on-call provider or Medical Director following a choking incident requiring the Heimlich maneuver. For Resident #7, the facility failed to notify the provider regarding omitted medications, refusal of as needed medication, escalating behaviors and a behavioral incident involving Resident #7 entering and remaining in another resident's bed despite multiple unsuccessful staff redirection attempts. The findings include:1. Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, oropharyngeal dysphagia (weakening of the throat muscles making it difficult to move food from the mouth into the throat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #8) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the state agency was notified within two (2) hours of an abuse allegation. The findings include:1. Resident #8's diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, chronic pain, major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder.A physician's order dated 10/8/25 directed Resident #8 required an assist of two (2) stand pivot transfer and utilized a wheelchair for mobility.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #8 had severely impaired cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3), required substantial assistance with bed mobility and was dependent on staff for transfers.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/9/26 identified Resident #8 had impaired cognitive function or impaired thought processes related to dementia, a communication problem related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for modified texture diets, the facility failed to revise the Resident Care Plan (RCP) to identify physician-ordered one-to-one feeding assistance following a choking incident resulting in Resident #1 not being provided one-to-one feeding assistance for meals per physician's order and for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #7) reviewed for behaviors, the facility failed to develop an RCP for ongoing behaviors, agitation, and repeated care refusals. The findings include:1. Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, oropharyngeal dysphagia (weakening of the throat muscles making it difficult to move food from the mouth into the throat and esophagus during swallowing) cerebrovascular disease (conditions that affect blood flow in the brain) and type II diabetes mellitus.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #8) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure a pain assessment was completed following injuries sustained from a resident to resident incident and failed to ensure Resident #8 was offered or administered as needed pain relief medication when the injuries were identified prior to hospital transfer. The findings include: Resident #8's diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, chronic pain, major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. A physician's order dated 10/8/25 directed Resident #8 required an assist of two (2) stand pivot transfer and utilized a wheelchair for mobility. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #8 had severely impaired cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3), required substantial assistance with bed mobility and was dependent on staff for transfers. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #7) reviewed for behaviors, the facility failed to ensure behavioral symptoms were identified and managed to prevent escalation. Specifically, this failure included the failure to document ineffective interventions, reapproach and administer medication for anxiety, restlessness or agitation, and implement effective interventions for ongoing yelling, paranoia, agitation and wandering behaviors prior to an altercation with another resident. The findings include:Resident #7's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (a change in brain function due to an underlying condition), dementia without behavioral disturbances, mild cognitive impairment, delusional disorder, anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder.The Nursing Evaluation dated 4/1/26 identified Resident #7 was admitted for a change in mental status, chronic decline and wandering. Resident #7 was alert and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for two (2) of eleven (11) sampled residents (Residents #11 and #12) reviewed for laboratory testing, the facility failed to ensure abnormal laboratory results were documented as reviewed with the provider and that a follow up assessment of the resident was completed by the nursing supervisor per policy. The findings include:1. Resident #11's diagnoses included end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis and type II diabetes mellitus.The Nursing Evaluation assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #11 was alert, oriented and appropriate and required limited assistance for bed mobility and extensive assistance for personal hygiene and transfers.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/1/26 identified Resident #11 had type II diabetes mellitus and required hemodialysis (a treatment to filter waste and water from the blood as the kidneys did when they were healthy) for end stage renal disease. Interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for two (2) of five (5) residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for modified texture diets, the facility failed to ensure residents received prescribed diets per physician's orders and the diet manual per International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) guidelines and failed to ensure staff were competent in the IDDSI modified texture diets. The findings include:1. Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, oropharyngeal dysphagia (weakening of the throat muscles making it difficult to move food from the mouth into the throat and esophagus during swallowing) cerebrovascular disease (conditions that affect blood flow in the brain) and type II diabetes mellitus.A physician's order dated 7/4/25 directed a regular diet IDDSI 6 soft and bite sized texture, IDDSI 0 thin Liquids consistency. The orders directed Resident #1 to utilize a lip plate, built-up utensils, and required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, for two (2) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for a safe and sanitary environment, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received care in a safe environment when a bathroom grab bar detached from the wall during use, resulting in a fall and rib fractures, and failed to ensure Resident #2 was provided a sanitary sleeping environment when the resident's mattress had a urine odor. The findings include:a. Resident #1's diagnoses included history of falls, heart failure, and anxiety.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12), was independent with care, transfers, and wheelchair use. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/12/25 identified Resident #1 had limited physical mobility and was at risk of falls. Interventions included staff assistance with daily care as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility documentation/policy and interviews, for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident #2) reviewed for grievances, the facility failed to ensure complaints/concerns reported by a resident representative were documented in the grievance log, investigated, and resolved in writing in accordance with the facility's grievance policy. The findings include: Interview with Person #1 on 2/5/26 at 11:30 AM identified he/she reported multiple care complaints/concerns to Social Workers (SW) and the Administrator over a prolonged period of time and had not been aware of a grievance process. Once made aware that the facility had a grievance process, he/she sent multiple emails regarding complaints/concerns because he/she did not know how to file a grievance using the grievance form. Person #1 did not receive written resolution for any complaints/concerns reported to the facility and was not made aware of resolutions to the complaints/concerns. Person #1 was not satisfied with the lack of follow-through on the complaints/concerns reported.Interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident #2) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to ensure Resident #2 who had a physician's order for oxygen was receiving oxygen as ordered. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), and history of pressure ulcers.The Physician's order dated 7/4/25 directed oxygen zero (0) to four (4) liters to maintain oxygen saturation above 92% due to hypoxia and to check oxygen saturations every shift.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had severely impaired cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was unable to be conducted), was oxygen dependent, and was dependent with all care.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/17/25 identified Resident #2 had an altered respiratory status due to COPD and a self-care deficit. Interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 63 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for three (3) of seven (7) sampled residents (Residents #1, #2 and #6) who were reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to notify the provider of medication omissions when the medications were not available. The findings include: 1. Resident #1's diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the ovaries, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety, delusional disorders, restlessness and agitation and depressive disorder. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of zero (0) out of fifteen (15) indicating memory recall deficits. The Resident Care Plan dated 4/28/25 identified Resident #1 received hospice services for a diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Interventions directed to administer medications per the physician's orders. a. A physician's order dated 1/11/25 directed to administer morphine sulfate oral solution 100 milligrams (mg) in 5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for two (2) of five (5) nurse aides reviewed for performance evaluations, the facility failed to ensure annual performance evaluations were completed. The findings include:1. NA #2 had a hire date of 7/13/23 and was due to have his/her annual performance review in 2024 and 2025, however documentation of the performance reviews was not available for review and could not be located. 2. NA #1 had a hire date of 4/30/24, had a probationary employee evaluation on 6/30/24 and was due to have his/her annual performance review on 6/30/25, however documentation of his/her performance review was not available for review in his/her personnel file and could not be located. Interview with the Administrator on 8/21/25 at 1:26 PM identified annual performance evaluations are to be done yearly but that he was unable to locate the performance evaluations for NA #1 and #2. Interview with Human Resources on 8/21/25 at 1:31 PM identified NA #1's annual performance evaluation for 2025 was due on 6/30/25 but that it had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews for facility QAPI review, the facility failed to maintain compliance with deficiencies previously cited. The findings include:A complaint survey was completed on 6/30/25 with findings related to significant medication errors and failures in notifying the provider. The facility Plan of Correction (PoC) identified audits would be conducted for three (3) months or until substantial compliance with QAPI oversight. Resident record review identified three (3) residents (Residents #1, 2 and 6) who were not administered scheduled medications, and the provider was not notified of the missed administrations. Resident record review identified three (3) residents (Residents #4, #6 and #15) who were administered scheduled medications late and the provider was not notified of the late administrations. Review of the 7/16/25 QAPI meeting identified the meeting included a review of the 6/30/25 survey results, including medication pass timeliness and noted that audits were ongoing and showed ongoing compliance improvement. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #3) who were reviewed for an allegation of physical abuse, the facility failed to ensure the resident was supervised when ambulating within the facility per the plan of care to prevent a resident-to-resident altercation. The findings include:Resident #3's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, history of falls, muscle weakness, delusional disorder, anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. The significant change Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of four (4) out of fifteen (15) indicating poor memory recall, required moderate assistance for bed mobility and supervision assistance with transfers and ambulating. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 5/30/25 identified that Resident #3 has limited physical mobility related to Alzheimer's disease and gait abnormalities. Interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility administered its resources effectively and to ensure effective administrative oversight of staff and resident care to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of residents. The findings include:The facility administration failed to: Ensure continued compliance with the plan of correction from a prior survey to ensure medications were administered per physician's orders. Ensure the residents were administered scheduled anxiety and narcotic pain medications. Ensure medications were refilled prior to exhausting the supply and ensure medications were delivered to the facility. Ensure the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) was notified of medication omissions. Ensure annual performance evaluations were completed when due. Ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate. Please cross reference F580, F730, F755, F760, F842 and F865. Based on the deficiencies during the survey, immediate jeopardy and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate documentation of medications in the Medication Administration Record (MAR). The findings include:1. Resident #1's diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the ovaries, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety, delusional disorders, restlessness and agitation and depressive disorder. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of zero (0) out of fifteen (15) indicating memory recall deficits. The Resident Care Plan dated 4/28/25 identified Resident #1 received hospice services for a diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Interventions directed to administer medications per the physician's orders. a. A physician's order dated 1/11/25 directed to administer morphine sulfate oral solution 100 milligrams (mg) in 5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility documentation and interviews for eleven (11) of eleven (11) residents (Resident #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, and #24) reviewed for physician's orders, the facility failed to ensure residents' orders were reviewed and signed by the physician monthly. The findings include:1. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of physician orders identified medical orders were not reviewed and signed on 5/1/25 or 6/1/25 in accordance with facility practices.2. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of physician orders identified medical orders were not reviewed and signed on 6/1/25 in accordance with facility practices.3. Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of physician orders identified medical orders were not reviewed and signed on 5/1/25 or 6/1/25 in accordance with facility practices.4. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of physician orders identified medical orders were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of eleven (11) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure the provider was notified of a change in condition when it was identified that the resident was having difficulty swallowing. The findings include:Resident #1 's diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, epilepsy (a brain disease where clusters of nerve cells signal abnormally causing a seizure), type 2 diabetes mellitus and adult failure to thrive.The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severely impaired cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0), was dependent on staff for eating, bed mobility and transfers and identified Resident #1 exhibited no signs and symptoms of a swallowing disorder.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/7/25 identified Resident #1 had impaired cognitive functioning/dementia. Interventions included administering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for two (2) of four (4) residents (Resident #4 and #7) reviewed for neglect, the facility failed to ensure allegations of neglect were reported to the State Agency timely. The findings include:1. Resident #4's diagnoses included heart failure, chronic pain and type II diabetes mellitus.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/23/2024 identified Resident #4 had diabetes mellitus, chronic pain, altered cardiac status and an implanted cardiac defibrillator (an implanted device under the skin that corrects life threatening heart rhythms). Interventions included administering medications as ordered by the physician and monitoring and documenting side effects and effectiveness.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #4 had intact cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15) and was independent with eating, bed mobility and transfers.Interview with Resident #4 on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for two (2) of four (4) residents (Resident #4 and #7) reviewed for neglect, the facility failed to ensure an investigation was completed timely and thoroughly following an allegation of neglect. The findings include: 1. Resident #4's diagnoses included heart failure, chronic pain and type II diabetes mellitus. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/23/2024 identified Resident #4 had diabetes mellitus, chronic pain, altered cardiac status and an implanted cardiac defibrillator (an implanted device under the skin that corrects life threatening heart rhythms). Interventions included administering medications as ordered by the physician and monitoring and documenting side effects and effectiveness. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #4 had intact cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15) and was independent with eating, bed mobility and transfers.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident #3) who had an order for a leave of absence with a responsible party only and had left the facility without informing the staff, the facility failed to ensure the front entrance door was secured or monitored to prevent the resident from leaving the facility unattended. The findings include: Resident #3's diagnoses included dementia, depression, and convulsions. A physician's orders dated 4/1/25 directed the resident may go on a leave of absence with a responsible party only and supervision for transfers and ambulation in the room and hallways. The Elopement Risk Assessment conducted on 5/15/25 identified Resident #3 was not at risk of elopement. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had poor short- and long-term memory recall, had not exhibited behaviors of wandering or elopement and ambulated without a device. The Resident Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and review of facility policy for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #43) reviewed for care planning, the facility failed to allow a resident to participate in Resident Care Conferences (RCC). The findings include: Resident #43's diagnoses included dementia, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, and osteoarthritis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #43 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment, required maximal assistance for his/her personal hygiene and chair/bed to chair transfers, and used a manual wheelchair. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 2/28/25 identified Resident #43 was dependent on staff for meeting his/her emotional, physical, and social needs related to physical limitations. Interventions included inviting the resident to scheduled activities, inviting the resident to attend special events, and providing the resident with materials for individual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policy for 6 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #2, Resident #7, Resident #43, Resident #70, Resident #79, and Resident #82) reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to provide clean bed and bath linens that were in good condition and in sufficient quantity for performing resident care tasks, and for the environment, the facility failed to ensure a safe and secured area on a locked, memory care unit. The findings include: 1a. Resident #2's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, and type 2 diabetes. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 was cognitively intact, dependent with showering and bathing, required set-up assistance with personal hygiene, and was independent with ambulation. An interview on 3/24/25 at 9:34 AM with Resident #2 identified the facility ran out of washcloths quite often, but he/she was not sure how many times a week there were no washcloths available. A lack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — patternProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical records, facility policy, and interviews for 11 of 40 sampled residents (Resident #12, Resident #23, Resident #33, Resident #39, Resident #45, Resident #50, Resident #57, Resident #59, Resident #84, Resident #92 and Resident #254) reviewed for a placement on a secured memory care unit, the facility failed to identify the clinical criteria for the unit, failed to document the resident or representative was included in the decision for placement on the unit, failed to ensure a physician order for placement on the unit, failed to assess for initial placement on the unit, failed to reassess for continued appropriate placement on the unit, and failed to document that information for independent egress had been provided. The findings include: 1. Resident #12's diagnosis included Parkinson's disease, dementia and emphysema. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #12 was severely, cognitively impaired and required substantial/maximal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 4 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #42, Resident #43, Resident #45, and Resident #84) reviewed for abuse for Resident #84 and #42, and Resident #84 and #45, the facility failed to ensure resident to resident physical mistreatment was reported to state protective services, for Resident #84 and Resident #43, the facility failed to report resident to resident physical mistreatment to state protective services and failed to report the allegation timely to the state agency, and for Resident #43 for a staff to resident allegation of physical mistreatment, failed to report the allegation to state protective services and failed to report the allegation to the state agency. The findings include: 1. Resident #84 had diagnoses that included dementia and delusional disorders. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #84 had long and short term memory problems with moderately impaired cognition,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #20 and Resident #47) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than 5% and for 1 of 5 sampled units, Pavillion Unit, for Residents #1, #24, #37, #79, #65, #60, #45, #72, #31, #78, and # 27, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered at the correct time per the physician's orders. The findings include: 1. Resident #20's diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, anxiety, acute angle closure glaucoma, and hypertension. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #20 as being cognitively intact. Physician's orders dated 1/10/25 directed to administer Coreg 12.5 mg (milligrams) 1 tablet (tab) 2 times a day and hold for a heart rate less than 50, Pilocarpine Solution 1% 1 eye drops to both eyes 3 times a day, and Trazadone HCL 100 mg give one tab 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on tour of the Dietary Department, staff interview and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was maintained in sanitary manner, failed to ensure open food items were dated to include dates opened/expired/use by, and failed to recheck temperatures of a resident's reheated food. The findings include: 1. Tour of the Dietary Department kitchen on 3/17/25 at 10:15 AM with the Food Service Director (FSD) identified the following: a. A heavy accumulation of white and brown debris/lint on the juice machine vent located on the upper front section of the chiller/juice machine. b. A heavy accumulation of congealed black and brown burnt residue on the stove, and surrounding surfaces. c. A large amount of white and brown congealed buildup on the conventional oven doors. An interview on 3/17/25 at 10:30 AM with the FSD identified that kitchen staff only clean the outside/surface of the juice machine, but the facility use a contracted company for a comprehensive cleaning of the machine every 3 months and as needed. The FSD indicated that the company last serviced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide all staff with abuse and neglect training and failed to develop staff training for abuse that included federal components for abuse education. The findings included: 1. A review of abuse and neglect training documentation identified education was provided for new hires during orientation and during in-services that had occurred in May 2024, September 2024 and March 2025. Review of the sign-in sheets identified 31 employees had not received any abuse and neglect training (19% of the facility employees). Interview with the Administrator on 3/27/25 at 2:03 PM identified that the facility policy training program for abuse and neglect training directed all staff were in-serviced annually. Additionally, the Staff Development nurse was responsible for ensuring all employees received the mandatory in-service training on neglect and abuse. Interview and in-service signature record review with the Staff Development Nurse on 3/27/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0946 — patternProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, facility documentation review, and facility policy, the facility failed to develop a compliance and ethics program and failed to provide staff with compliance and ethics training. The findings included: Interview with the Administrator, Regional Registered Nurse (RN) #4, and Regional Registered Nurse (RN) #8 on 3/27/25 at 9:46 AM identified the facility did not have a compliance and ethics program and also did not have a compliance and ethics policy. It was further identified that compliance and ethics training is not part of new hire orientation or annual training. RN #4 and RN #8 stated there was a Code of Conduct policy, but this Code of Conduct is not communicated to the entire facility staff. The DNS was unavailable for interview. Although requested, a policy on Compliance and Ethics was not provided. The Code of Conduct policy failed to include the basic components of an ethics and compliance program including but not limited to: identification of a compliance officer or committee; how and who to report ethical concerns to; secure, confidential, and timely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and facility policy for 3 of 6 residents, (Resident #42, Resident #43, and Resident #84) reviewed for abuse, for Resident #42 and #84, the facility failed to ensure that a resident-to-resident altercation, and for Resident #43 that a staff-to-resident altercation, involving physical mistreatment was properly reported according to policies, failed to implement policies to ensure a resident was protected from abuse, and failed to establish abuse procedures for coordination with the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. The findings include: 1.a.Resident #42 had diagnoses that included dementia and anxiety. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #42 had severe cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview of Mental Status, BIMS of 0 and was independent with ambulation. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/23/24 identified Resident #42 had impaired thought process, and an ADL…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #59) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to review and revise the Resident Care Plan (RCP). The findings include: Resident #59's diagnoses included dementia, congestive heart failure, and bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #59 had severe cognitive impairment, required set-up assistance with eating, required supervision with personal hygiene, and was independent with ambulation. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) in effect on 3/24/25 identified Resident #59 had a communication problem related to being severely hard of hearing. Interventions included discussing with the resident and his/her family concerns or feelings regarding communication difficulties and encouraging the resident to continue stating his/her thoughts. A review of social service progress notes and Resident Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and facility policy for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to turn and reposition a resident with a pressure ulcer according to the physician's order. The findings include: Resident #4's diagnoses included dementia, generalized muscle weakness, anxiety and hypertension. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 indicating severe cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, personal hygiene, and transfers, and required maximum assistance for bed mobility. The MDS identified that Resident #4 had impairment on both sides of the upper and lower extremities and was always incontinent of urine and bowel. Additionally, the MDS identified that Resident #4 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers and had a pressure reducing device for bed, but did not have a current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #39) reviewed for positioning and mobility, the facility failed to ensure a pelvic positioning belt was applied per the physician's order. The findings include: Resident #39's diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, vascular dementia, and muscle weakness. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #39 was severely cognitively impaired, dependent with toileting, and required partial/moderate assistance with bed mobility and transfers. A Morse fall scale dated 1/20/25 identified Resident #39 had a history of falling and was a high risk for falls. The Resident Care Plan dated 3/3/25 identified Resident #39 was non-ambulatory, required assistance of 1 for transfers, and was a fall risk. Interventions included providing assistive and adaptive devices as ordered and to ensure proper positioning when sitting in a chair. An Occupational Therapy (OT #1) note…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #57) reviewed for accidents and hazards, the facility failed to provide an assistive device and supervision with ambulation per the physician's order for a resident who was a high fall risk and for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #84) reviewed for dementia care, the facility failed to provide supervision with ambulation at mealtime per the physician's order for a resident with dementia and dysphagia. The findings include: 1. Resident #57's diagnoses included dementia, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on his/her feet and a history of falling. A Morse fall scale evaluation dated 2/7/25 identified Resident #57 used an ambulatory aide (walker) and was a high risk for falling. A Physical Therapy (PT) evaluation and plan of treatment dated 2/7/25 identified Resident #57 was a fall risk and required supervision with a 2 wheeled walker as an assistive device. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #96) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to provide adequate hydration to a resident with a potential for a fluid deficit. The findings included: Resident #96's diagnoses included pressure ulcer of the sacral region, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and congestive heart failure (CHF). A Dietary Nutritional admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #96's fluid intake goal was 1400-1700 ml per 24 hours. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #96 was cognitively intact, required set up for eating/drinking, and was dependent on staff for hygiene. Additionally, the MDS identified Resident #96 was on a diuretic (a medication that promotes fluid loss through urination). The Resident Care Plan dated 2/13/25 identified Resident #96 had a potential for a fluid deficit related to congestive heart failure, diuretic therapy, and bilateral lower extremity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #50) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was in place when administering continuous oxygen. The findings include: Resident #50's diagnoses included pneumonitis, Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), pleural effusion, and resolved bronchitis and hypoxia (low oxygen). The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #50 was severely cognitively impaired and was dependent with bed mobility, toileting, and transfers. The Resident Care Plan dated 1/5/25 identified altered cardiovascular status and anemia. Interventions included monitoring for shortness of breath and deterioration of respiratory status, monitor vital signs, and administer medications as ordered. Review of Resident #50's March 2025 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) identified a physician's order, beginning on 2/24/25 for Oxygen 0 to 4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for the only sampled resident, (Resident #66), reviewed for hemolytic treatment, the facility failed to ensure appropriate communication occurred between the hemolytic treatment center and the facility. The findings include: Resident #66's diagnoses included end stage renal disease, dependence on hemolytic treatment, and anemia. A physician's order dated 1/19/25 directed to send Resident #66 to hemolytic treatments 3 times per week. On the resident's return, staff were to record the resident's hemolytic center weight from the communication book to ensure consistency. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #66 was cognitively intact and required partial moderate assistance with personal hygiene, dressing, bed mobility, transfer, and toileting, and required set up assistance with eating. Additionally, Resident #66 was receiving hemolytic treatment. A. The Resident Care Plan dated 1/25/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews for 2 of 6 sampled residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #57 and Resident #84), the facility failed to ensure staff competency related to electronic medical record (EMR) use. The findings include: 1. Resident #57's diagnoses included dementia, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet and a history of falling. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #57 was severely cognitively impaired and required supervision or touch assistance for transfers, toileting, and bed mobility. The MDS indicated use of a mobility device/walker. The Resident Care Plan dated 3/2/25 identified Resident #57 had limited physical mobility, a self-care performance deficit, and a risk for falls. Interventions included ambulation and transfers with supervision and a 2 wheeled walker in the room and hallways, provide supportive care and assistance with mobility as needed, and assistance of 1 for bathing, dressing, and toileting. An interview, observation, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #66) reviewed for hemolytic treatments, the facility failed to provide appropriate packaging for medication being sent with a resident for hemolytic treatments and failed to assess a resident for self-administration of medication. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure narcotic keys for the medication cart were safely kept with the charge nurse, failed to ensure bimonthly narcotic audits were conducted, and failed to ensure narcotics for destruction in the Director of Nursing (DNS) office were stored appropriately. The findings include: 1. Resident #66's diagnoses included end stage renal disease, dependence on hemolytic treatment and anemia. A Physician's order dated 1/17/25 directed to send hydralazine (lowers blood pressure) 100 milligrams 1 tablet on Monday, Wednesday and Friday with Resident #66 to his/her hemolytic treatments. A physician's order dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 11 sampled residents (Resident #48) observed in the east dining area during meals, the facility failed to provide adaptive equipment as identified on the meal ticket. The findings include: Resident #48's diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, severe dementia with anxiety, and adult failure to thrive. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #48 was severely cognitively impaired and required substantial maximum assistance with eating and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene, dressing, toileting, bed mobility, and transfer. The Resident Care Plan dated 1/23/25 identified Resident #48 had a dementia diagnosis which could affect appetite/intake, has a history of significant weight loss, is taking psychotropic medications which can affect appetite/intake, and used adaptive equipment to help with independent eating. Interventions included diet as ordered, provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to administer its resources effectively and to ensure timely and effective administrative oversight of staff and resident care to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of residents. The findings include: The facility administration failed to: Ensure the State Agency was notified, in a timely manner, of reportable events Ensure allegations of abuse were investigated timely and thoroughly Ensure staff accused of abuse were removed from the schedule timely Ensure residents were provided with an environment free from involuntary seclusion. Ensure medications were administered timely and according to professional standards. Ensure narcotics were properly stored and bimonthly narcotic audits were performed. Ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate. Ensure staff received adequate training per federal guidelines. Ensure residents were provided with a sufficient number of clean bed and bath linens. Ensure care plans…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, review of facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #4) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn prior to personal care, for 1 of 5 sampled resident units (for Resident #96, Resident #404, and Resident #407) reviewed for infection control practices, for Resident #96, failed to implement the appropriate precautions for an active Multi-Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO) and failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene during wound care for Resident #404, failed to ensure appropriate PPE was worn upon entering the resident's room and failed to implement appropriate precautions for an active MDRO, and for Resident #407 failed to ensure appropriate hand washing for a resident with an active MDRO. The findings include: 1. Resident #4's diagnoses included dementia, generalized muscle weakness, anxiety, and hypertension. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the resident was safely transferred in the mechanical lift resulting in minor injuries on two (2) separate occasions. The findings include: Resident #1 had diagnoses including morbid obesity, chronic pain, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, localized edema to the bilateral lower extremities and depression. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 2/17/22 identified that Resident #1 had an alteration in Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) related to difficulty walking and generalized weakness post hospitalization for dyspnea (shortness of breath), pulmonary edema (excess fluids in the lungs), Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and lymphedema (swelling cause by a lymphatic system blockage) with interventions that included providing assistance as needed and Physical Therapy (PT) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #1), reviewed for wounds, the facility failed to ensure the resident care plan identified an actual skin impairment that required treatment. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnosis included end stage renal disease (ESRD), sepsis, diabetes mellitus, heart failure and history of cellulitis to the left lower limb. Nursing Clinical admission Documentation dated 10/7/23 identified Resident #1 had no skin lesions. A Nurse's note dated 10/10/23 completed by Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN #1 identified Resident #1 had four (4) soft scabbed areas to the left shin with no drainage noted. The shin was swollen,and the peri wound was red. The Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) was updated, and a new treatment was prescribed for Medi honey to the scabbed areas followed by non-woven gauze with Kling (wrap) to secure. A physician's order dated 10/10/23 directed to apply…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #1), who were reviewed for wounds, the facility failed to ensure a wound assessment or evaluation was completed for a resident who developed a skin impairment. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnosis included end stage renal disease (ESRD), sepsis, diabetes mellitus, heart failure and history of cellulitis to the left lower limb. Nursing Clinical admission Documentation dated 10/7/23 identified Resident #1 had no skin lesions. A Nurse's note dated 10/10/23 completed by Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN #1 identified Resident #1 had (4) soft scabbed areas to the left shin. No drainage was noted. The shin was swollen, peri wound red. The Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) was updated, and a new treatment was prescribed for Medi honey to the scabbed areas followed buy non-woven gauze with Kling (wrap) to secure. A physician's order dated 10/10/23 directed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for a change in condition, the facility failed to ensure complete neurological assessments were completed timely for a resident after an unwitnessed fall. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, dementia, seizures, anxiety disorder, and depression. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) form dated 5/10/2023 identified Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment and was independent for bed mobility, transfers, and locomotion. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 5/17/2023 identified an alteration in ADLs performance. Interventions directed to assist as needed and provide assistive/adaptive device: walker/wheelchair. A reportable event form and investigation dated 8/5/2023 at 11:30 PM identified Resident #1 was observed on the floor in his/her room and was lethargic, weak, and confused, and indicated he/she was going to the bathroom. RN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-03 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews for one of one resident (Resident # 65) reviewed for dementia care, The facility failed to ensure that the resident and or the resident representative was informed in advance of the risk and benefits of a psychotropic medication and failed to obtain a consent before initiation of a psychotropic medication. The findings include. Resident # 65's diagnosis included adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), unspecified dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and suicidal ideation. A psychiatric consultation note dated 3/18/2021 directed to add Trazadone(antidepressant) 25 Milligrams (MG) every 6 hours as needed for anxiety/sleep. A physician's order dated 6/18/2021 directed the use of Trazadone 75 MG at bedtime. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #65 was moderately cognitive impairment and required set up for bed mobility, eating and showering. The care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-03 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation and interview for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #36), the facility failed to provide evidence that recommendations were followed in accordance with professional standards. the findings included: Resident #36 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses included transient ischemic disorder, anxiety disorder, personality disorder, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, and unsteadiness with walking. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #36 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of thirteen out of fifteen, indicating no cognitive impairment. Resident #36 required extensive assistance of one staff member with transfers, and partial assistance of one staff member with toileting and activities of daily living (ADL). The Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) consult provided dated 2/8/22 identified the need for weekly individualized counseling, physical therapy (PT) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation of the kitchen, review of facility documentation, facility policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner and the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher water temperatures were consistently documented and failed to ensure food was handled in accordance with infection control standards. The findings included: An observation on 10/31/21 at 10:05AM with the Food Service Director (FSD) of the kitchen identified the following: 1 A large amount of white and brown congealed buildup on the front and side of oven. 2. A large amount of brown congealed buildup behind the stove where the floor meets the wall and behind the side counter where the floor meets the wall. An interview on 10/31/22 at 10:05 AM with the FSD identified the facility used to have a contracted company who provided more comprehensive cleaning services. The facility has not utilized the cleaning company for approximately 6 months. The FSD further indicated that although the staff should have ensured the cleaning of the stove and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-03 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Facility Assessment review, facility documentation review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the Facility Assessment was updated yearly. The findings include: An interview on 10/31/2022 with the Director of Maintenance who stated that he was asked to find the Facility Assessment. The Director of Maintenance further indicated he could only find the Facility assessment dated 2018. The Maintenance Director also indicated that it was the Administrator's responsibility to maintain the Facility Assessment and indicated that the old administrator left last month, and the Interim administrator (Administrator #1) last day was today. A review of the facility's Facility Assessment on 10/31/22 failed to reflect that yearly Facility Assessments had been conducted for 2020, 2021 and 2022, Interview on 10/31/2022 with Administrator #1 in the presence of Maintenance Director identified she did not know if the Facility Assessment Form presented to surveyor from 2018 was the most up to date. Administrator 1 indicated her last day was today and the new Administrator was due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-03 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility documentation review, facility policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director consistently attended the quarterly QA meetings to maintain an effective and comprehensive Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. The findings include: On 11/02/22 at 12:52 PM an Interview with Administrator #2 and the Director of Nursing (DNS) during a reviewed the QAPI meeting agenda for 10/27/2022 shared minutes and meeting attendees. The DNS indicated that the Medical Director does not attend quarterly QA meetings consistently from 1/2022 to 10/27/22. She further indicated although the Medical Director does not attend all the QA meetings, she provides an update to the Medical Director of the quarterly minutes when he comes to the building. The DNS was unable to provide signature sheets from 1/2022 to 10/27/22 of the Medical Directors attendances at the QA quarterly meetings. Interview with the Medical Director on 11/2/22 at 4:00 PM identified he does not attend the scheduled QA meetings at the facility. The Medical Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to document the completion of the legionella mitigation steps as per the facility plan and for 1 sampled resident ( Resident # 12) who utilized a urinary device, the facility failed to store the device in a bag to prevent the spread of infection and for 1 resident ( Resident # 35) who utilized oxygen, the facility failed to store the oxygen and label tubing in the manner that was sanitary and prevent the spread of infection and or 1 of 2 residents ( Resident # 54) reviewed for reviewed for Respiratory Care, the facility failed to ensure that appropriate infection control practices were followed for storage of respiratory equipment .The findings included: An Environmental Assessment and Procedure document dated January 2019 identified the facility posed a medium risk to promote growth of legionella and the mitigation steps in part were outlined to include: 1. Hot water storage area: hot water should be maintained at or above 140…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-03 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to obtain written signatures for consent or refusal of required vaccinations for 5 of 5 residents) reviewed for vaccinations (Resident #21, #25, #47, #63) and for (Resident #76 the facility failed to provide documentation of screening for eligibility and education provided for pneumococcal vaccination within accordance to facility practice and policy. The findings included: 1. a. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A Preventative Health report with a run date of 11/1/22 at 3:24 PM identified that from 3/8/22 to 11/1/22, Resident #21 refused the pneumococcal vaccination on 3/14/22. The report also identified that Resident #21 had received a COVID 19 booster shot at the facility on 4/11/22. b. Resident #25 was last admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A Preventative Health report with a run date of 11/1/22 at 5:46 PM identified that from 3/7/15 to 11/1/22, Resident #25 received the influenza vaccination…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-03 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure essential kitchen equipment was maintained in safe working condition. The findings include: Invoice for services performed dated 8/29/22 noted a problem with the control board with the display board being replaced. Recommendations were made at that time to replace the dishwasher. A quote dated 9/22/22 noted the cost of a new dishwasher. An observation on 10/31/22 at 10:05AM with the FSD identified the rinse cycle display on the high temperature dishwasher read 112 degrees. The company who services the facility dishwasher was called out after experiencing a problem with the control panel where temperature readings were displayed. The company came out and determined there was not an issue with the rinse temperatures, only in the display reading during the rinse cycle. Subsequent to surveyor inquiry, purchase order dated 11/2/22 for a new dishwasher was placed with a delivery date of 11/17/22. An interview on 11/03/22 at 1:31 PM with the Director of Maintenance identified all previous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one resident (Resident # 54) reviewed for skin conditions, non-pressure, the facility failed to ensure that the care plan comprehensive and individualized with goals and interventions to reflected the resident's psoriasis skin condition. The findings include: Resident #54's diagnoses included psoriasis and Type 2 diabetes mellitus. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #54 had no cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility, transfer, toileting, bathing, and personal hygiene. Additionally, the assessment identified the resident was at risk for pressure ulcer but did not have any unhealed pressure ulcers. The care plan dated 8/21/2022 identified a problem due to a fungal rash to bilateral groin, interventions included : to ensure skin is clean and free from moisture and to provide treatment as ordered. The care plan further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of policy and staff interviews for 1 sample resident (Resident # 337) reviewed for infection, the facility failed to monitor the resident's Vancomycin trough level according to the professional standard when resident was receiving intravenous (IV) Vancomycin medication. The findings include: Resident #337 diagnoses included sepsis, cellulitis of left lower limb, osteomyelitis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of right foot and Methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus infection. The physician's order dated 10/10/22 directed to administered Vancomycin reconstitute solution 1.25 gram once a day intravenously every evening. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/10/22 identified Resident #337 required intravenously antibiotic related to gangrene. Intervention included: administered IV antibiotic per physician ordered, follow regimen when caring for IV site and laboratory per physician order. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy and interviews, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #76), the facility failed to consult the dietician regarding a new pressure area within 7 days per facility policy. The findings include: Resident #76 was admitted with diagnoses that included vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance and displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 76 was severely cognitively impaired requiring extensive assistance of 2 staff members for bed mobility and extensive assistance of 1 staff member for personal hygiene. Additionally, the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #76 was at risk for development of pressure ulcers/injuries and indicated the resident did not have any unhealed pressure ulcers/injuries. The care plan reviewed on 7/27/22 identified that Resident #76 was at risk for skin breakdown-skin tears-abrasions-bruising secondary to fragile skin, at risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based clinical record review, facility policy and interviews for 1 resident (Resident # 14) reviewed for hospitalizations, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for an increase in oxygen therapy for a resident experiencing a change in condition according to standards of practice and facility policy. The findings include: Resident #14 was admitted with diagnoses that included end stage small cell lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and diabetes mellitus Type II. The MDS 5-day assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #14 had moderate cognitive impairment and required total assist with personal care. The care plan dated 10/6/22 identified Resident #14 was at risk for altered respiratory status related to history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and hypoxia. Interventions included: to administer oxygen as ordered, assess and record for signs of impaired gas exchange, to monitor oxygen saturation per physician order and to position upright for optimal breathing. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility policy and interviews for one resident (Resident # 14) reviewed for hospitalizations, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record for a resident who experienced a change of condition and for one sampled resident ( Resident # 65), reviewed for dental, the facility failed to ensure the resident's dental visit was uploaded to the clinical record within accordance to facility practice. The findings included: 1. Resident #14 was admitted on with diagnoses that included end stage small cell lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and diabetes mellitus Type II. The 5-day MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #14 had moderate cognitive impairment and required total assist with personal care. The care plan dated 10/6/22 identified Resident #14 was at risk for altered respiratory status related to history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and hypoxia. Interventions included: to administer oxygen as ordered,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-03 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolatedHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility documentation review, facility policy review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective, comprehensive, data driven Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. The findings include: On 11/02/22 at 12:52 PM an Interview with Administrator #2 and the Director of Nursing (DNS) during a reviewed the QAPI meeting agenda for 10/27/2022 shared minutes and meeting attendees. The DNS indicated that the Medical Director does not attend quarterly .The DNS further indicated that a while back it was noted there was an uptick in the number of falls. The DNS further indicated that since falls were addressed in QAPI, falls had been reduced dramatically and the facility is continuing to use the audits. However, the facility was unable to share evidence of follow-up on QAPI issues regarding fall prevention and statistical data to monitor the effectiveness of the plan. The facility policy named Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement/Corporate Compliance Program dated 9/2020 indicated in part the facility would establish and maintain a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-03 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure that the QAPI committee tracked, analyzed, and acted on data obtained. The findings include: On 11/02/22 at 12:52 PM an Interview with Administrator #2 and the Director of Nursing (DNS) indicated that they had noticed an uptick in resident falls and since brought to QAPI Falls have been dramatically reduced and they continue to complete audits. The facility was unable to share evidence of follow-up on QAPI issues that require Follow-up and documentation. The facility policy named Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement/Corporate Compliance Program dated 9/2020 indicated in part that the facility would establish and maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement program (QAPI) by utilizing information and data to define and measure goals.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility policy and interviews during the initial tour of the Dietary Department, the facility failed to discard expired refrigerated food and failed to ensure a sanitary environment. The findings include: During the initial kitchen tour of the Dietary Department on 12/16/19 at 10:10 AM with the Food Service Director (FSD) the following was identified: sour cream that expired on 12/2/19, low fat cottage cheese that expired on 11/8/19, and non-fat cottage cheese that expired on 12/11/19. Additionally, the cooking hood baffles were coated in grease and black debris and located above a cheese sauce that was cooking on the stove. The hot water steam feed pipe to the steamer, that was no longer functioning, was coated with grease and hanging black debris located above the griddle that had been used, according to the FSD, for breakfast. The ceiling above the cooking area was stained and dirty with dark debris. The paint was noted to be peeling above the food preparation counter with bare areas where the paint had come off. In the corner, by the hand washing sink the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, policy review, and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #35) who was reviewed for an allegation of mistreatment, the facility failed to ensure the allegation of mistreatment was reported to the administrator and state agency at the time the incident occurred. The findings include: Resident #35's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety, major depression, and multiple sclerosis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #35 had no memory recall deficits, was alert and oriented to the year, month and day, exhibited no behavioral symptoms, required extensive assistance of one (1) person with toilet use, personal hygiene and dressing, was non-ambulatory and utilized a wheelchair for mobility on and off the unit. The Resident Care Plan dated 8/27/19 identified Resident #35 had an alteration in activity of daily living related to physical status. Interventions directed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a clinical record review, a review of the facility documentation, a review of the facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #75), the facility failed to consistently document intake and output for a resident who had a suprapubic catheter and received tube feedings, and for one sampled resident (Resident #85), the facility failed to appropriately label dressings following a dressing change. The findings include: a. Resident # 75 diagnoses included Parkinson's disease neurogenic bladder and obstructive uropathy. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified moderate cognitive impairment, extensive assistance of 2 staff for bed mobility and transfers, extensive assistance of one person for dressing and toileting, total dependence for personal hygiene and had an indwelling catheter. A physician order dated 11/1/19 directed to administer Jevity 1.2 240 cubic centimeters (cc) bolus feeds every 3 hours between 6:00 AM and midnight and free water flushes of 100…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, policy review, and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #22) who was dependent on staff for transfers in and out of the bed via a mechanical lift, the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision of the mechanical lift to prevent an accident with an injury. The findings include: Resident #22's diagnoses included vascular dementia, Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, psychotic disorders with hallucinations and delusions, and chronic pain. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #22 had some difficulty with making decisions regarding tasks of daily life, difficulty focusing attention, disorganized thinking and required extensive two (2) person assistance with turning and repositioning when in bed and personal hygiene, was totally dependent on two (2) person assistance with transfers in and out of the bed and chair, was non-ambulatory, utilized a wheelchair for mobility, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a clinical record review, a review of facility documentation, staff interviews, and a review of facility the policy, for one sampled resident (Resident #6) reviewed for weight loss, the facility failed to implement dietary recommendations and/or failed to follow physician orders and/or failed to reweigh the resident in accordance with the facility policy. The findings include: Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included feeding difficulties, hypokalemia, major depressive disorder, constipation, generalized muscle weakness, and a Vitamin D Deficiency. A physician order dated 9/1/19 directed to provide a snack at bedtime and document the percentage taken. A physician order dated 9/4/19 directed to obtain weekly weights. A physician order dated 9/10/19 directed to re-weigh Resident #6. The September 2019 weight log identified on 9/3/19 a recorded wight of 146.4 pounds (lbs), the weight on 9/5/19 was 138.6 lbs which identified a weight loss of 5.33%. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-20 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #85) reviewed for infections, the facility failed to identify a discrepancy in the measurement of a Percutaneously Inserted Central Catheter (PICC). The findings include: Resident #85 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included osteomyelitis of the ankle and right foot, Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus infection (MRSA), Diabetes and Schizophrenia. A physician's order dated 11/27/19 directed to measure the right upper extremity PICC external catheter length and arm circumference with dressing changes on Wednesday on the 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM shift and as needed. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/27/19 identified a Percutaneously Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line in place to provide IV antibiotic therapy. Interventions included to administer IV medications per the physician's order, change the dressing per the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-04-22 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for six (6) of six (6) sampled residents (Residents #8, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17) reviewed for comprehensive assessments, the facility failed to ensure the resident comprehensive assessments were completed within fourteen (14) days of the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) as required. The findings include:1. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #13 was noted to have an ARD of 3/18/26 and was due to be completed by 4/1/26. Review of the admission MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #13 identified it was completed on 4/6/26 (5-days late). 2. The quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #15 was noted to have an ARD date of 4/1/26 and was due to be completed by 4/15/26. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #15 on 4/20/26 identified it had yet to be completed (5-days late). 3. The quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #8 was noted to have an ARD (final day of the resident's observation period) of 4/2/26 and was due to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-03-27 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — widespreadProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and the facility assessment, the facility failed to provide facility staff with behavioral health education as identified on the annual assessment. The findings included: A review of the facility assessment dated [DATE] identified the facility was able to admit residents that needed care for psychiatric/mood disorders such as psychosis, impaired cognition, mental disorder, depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorder and behaviors that need interventions. Additionally, the assessment identified Nursing Assistants (NA's) were provided with education on combative care and those with behavioral disturbances. Review of the in-service calendars dated March 2024 through March 2025 failed to identify scheduled behavioral health training by the facility or by the psychiatry services group. Review of the behavioral health education dated 3/26/25 identified a Personality Disorders in-service provided by the psychiatry services provider…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-03-27 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's Personal Funds Account, review of facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure necessary coverage through a surety bond for the Resident Trust Accounts. The findings include: On 3/20/25 at 3:23 PM, interview and review of the Resident Trust Account (RTA) balances with the Business Office staff indicated that the RTA balance for the period of 2/1/25 through 2/28/25 ranged from $76,586.13 dollars to $142,392.69. Additionally, the RTA balance for the period of 6/1/24 through 6/30/24 indicated a balance ranging from $63,261.77 to $109,338.53. The RTA balance for the period of 8/1/24 to 8/31/24 identified a balance ranging from $65,134.70 to $118,534.21 during that time. The RTA balance for the period of 9/1/24 through 9/30/24 identified a balance ranging from $66,003.21 to $116,259.39 during that time. The RTA balance for the period of 10/1/24 through 10/31/24 identified a balance ranging from $62,879.01 to $105,474.01 during that time. The RTA balance for the period of 11/1/24 through 11/30/24 identified a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, review of facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #43 and Resident #46) for Resident #43 reviewed for abuse and Resident #46 reviewed for falls, the documentation failed to correctly reflect actual events. The findings include: 1. Resident #43's diagnoses included dementia, chronic kidney disease, and hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #43 was cognitively intact, did not experience episodes of delusions, and required maximal assistance for his/her toileting hygiene and chair to bed and bed to chair transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) in effect on 1/3/25 identified Resident #43 experienced frequent episodes of incontinence of bladder with an intervention of an assist of 2 with toileting upon request. The Resident Care Card in effect on 1/3/25 identified Resident #43 was to have 2 staff members present at all times when in his/her room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, facility policy, and documentation reviewed for the facility Quality Assurance Improvement Plan (QAPI), the facility failed to include the Infection Preventionist in the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings. The findings include: An interview on 3/20/25 at 10:20 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #9 identified she began her oversight of the Infection Prevention program around September/October of 2024. An interview and QAPI documentation review with the Administrator on 3/24/25 at 11:13 AM identified the facility meets on a monthly basis for QAPI/QAA meetings. A review of the meeting sign-in sheets with the Administrator identified meetings were held in July 2024, August 2024, September 2024, October 2024, November 2024, December 2024, and January 2025. Although the Infection Preventionist did attend the January 2025 meeting she failed to attend the meetings in July through December of 24 (missing 6 of 7 opportunities for attendance). The Administrator indicated the reason an Infection Preventionist did not attend the QAPI/QAA meetings was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-03-27 · tag F0944 — patternConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interviews, facility documentation review, and facility policy, during the extended survey, the facility failed to provide staff with mandatory training on the QAPI program or how to communicate concerns, problems or opportunities for improvement. The findings included: Interview with the Administrator, Regional Registered Nurse (RN) #4, and Regional Registered Nurse (RN) #8 on 3/27/25 at 9:46 AM identified the facility had a Code of Conduct policy, but this Code of Conduct was not communicated to the entire facility staff. The DNS was unavailable for interview. Although requested, a policy was not provided. The Code of Conduct policy failed to include the basic components of utilizing a QAPI program.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$180,374 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $96,604 — penalty dated 2026-04-22
- $22,315 — penalty dated 2026-02-06
- $34,600 — penalty dated 2025-06-30
- $26,855 — penalty dated 2025-03-27
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIRLIS CHILDREN TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/01/2022 |
| MILLER, JOHN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 06/30/2017 |
| MIRLIS, ELIYAHU | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/01/2022 |
| ROSE, NATHAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CT
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075158. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.