Saint Josephs Living Center INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 67 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 108.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-04-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to recognize, assess, and manage acute pain for two of three sampled residents reviewed for accidents (Residents #1 and #5), resulting in actual harm when both residents experienced prolonged unrelieved pain after emergent injuries. Resident #1 sustained a second degree burn on 3/4/26 with documented discomfort. Yet, staff did not complete a comprehensive pain assessment or administer available PRN analgesia. The ordered burn dressing was no applied until the next shift, leaving the resident to report throbbing pain for many hours without follow up from nursing. Similarly, on 3/15/26, Resident #5 experienced a witnessed fall with visible left arm deformity and severe pain, but staff failed to administer any PRN pain medication before the resident was transported to the emergency department approximately 35 minutes later, despite active orders for both acetaminophen and morphine; the resident did not receive pain relief until more…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents #1 and #5) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate clinical records by failing to ensure physician orders obtained following an incident were transcribed into the medical record and failing to ensure all licensed nurses involved in the incidents documented the care and services provided. The findings include:1. Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, type II diabetes mellitus, muscular dystrophy (progressive muscle weakness and degeneration), lymphedema (chronic swelling of the body's tissues caused by lymphatic fluid buildup) and anxiety disorder.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had intact cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15), and was independent for eating, bed mobility, transfers and ambulation.The Resident Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 6 of 13 residents (Resident #22, Resident #36, Resident #44, Resident #64, Resident #71 and Resident #89) reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and 1 of 2 residents (Resident #211) reviewed for Transmission Based Precautions (TBP), the facility failed to initiate Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) per Center of Disease Control (CDC) guidelines for residents with a history of Multiple Drug Resistant Organisms (MDROs) and failed to perform hand hygiene after exiting a resident room and before entering another resident room and failed to maintain Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) while assisting a resident with a positive COVID-19 diagnosis. The findings include: 1. Resident #22, Resident #36 and Resident #44 had diagnoses that included a history of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Resident #64 had diagnoses that included a history of Clostridium Difficile (C. Diff.).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #208) reviewed for Nutrition, the facility failed to identify preferences for meals and provide choices for food items. The findings include: Resident #208 was admitted to the facility in November of 2024 and had diagnoses that included fracture of upper end of the right humerus and diabetes. A Physician's order dated 11/21/24 at 4:36 PM directed to provide a regular diet, regular thin consistency. A Dietary admission assessment dated [DATE] at 2:11 PM identified Resident #208 wanted a diet change to a diabetic diet with limited carbohydrate portions, increased vegetables and protein. assessment indicated the Food Service Director would updated. On 11/25/24 at 2:21 PM a Physician's order directed to provide a consistent carbohydrate diet, regular texture, regular thin consistency per resident request. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for the environment, the facility failed to ensure resident room temperatures were comfortable. The findings included: Resident #12 was admitted to the facility in April of 2023 with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Muscle Weakness, and Congestive Heart Failure. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #12 was cognitively intact (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14). Observations on 12/4/24 at 11:30 AM, identified Resident #12 lying in bed, closest to the window, wearing a red jacket (fleece material), and covered in two thick plush blankets. The room temperature was observed to be cool. Interview with Resident #12 on 12/4/24 at 11:30 AM, identified the room temperature had been cold for a couple of weeks and when Resident #12 communicated feeling cold to the staff, a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #81) reviewed for pressure injuries, the facility failed to ensure a dietician assessment was completed in a timely manner for a resident with a new facility acquired pressure injury and failed to perform preventative weekly skin assessments per provider order and facility policy and failed to perform weekly wound assessments per provider order. The findings include: Resident #81 was admitted to the facility in November of 2023 and had diagnoses that included Parkinson ' s disease, diabetes, and aphasia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #81 was severely cognitively impaired (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6), required partial/moderate assistance with bed mobility and transfers and was at risk for developing pressure injuries. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 7/31/2024 identified Resident #81 had potential…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #210) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to follow the plan of care to prevent an accident for a resident who was at risk of falls. The findings include: Resident #210 was admitted to the facility in October of 2022 with diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure, heart failure, long term (current) use of anticoagulants and difficulty in walking. Physician ' s order dated [DATE] directed to administer oxygen at 3 liters (L) per minute via nasal cannula. Physician's order dated [DATE] directed to place a sensor alarm to Resident #210's bed and chair every shift for safety. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #210 was moderately cognitively impaired (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12) and was dependent for toileting hygiene, required moderate assistance with positioning from lying to sitting on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #203) reviewed for nutrition and hydration, the facility failed to obtain accurate weights and failed to notify the provider of weight increases according to provider order. The findings include: Resident #203 was admitted to the facility in December of 2024 and had diagnoses that included periprosthetic fracture around the internal prosthetic right hip, diabetes, congestive heart failure (CHF) and hypertension. The admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #203 was alert and oriented to person, place and time. The Resident Care Plan dated 12/2/24 identified CHF and a risk for complications due to CHF. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered, check labs as ordered, chest x-ray as needed, daily weights for CHF, report weight gain of 3 pounds (lbs.) or more in a day to physician, diet as ordered, notify Physician of signs or symptoms of CHF…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure shift to shift controlled drug reconciliation was consistently completed and failed to maintain documentation of bi-monthly controlled drug audits. The findings include: 1. Observations on 12/9/24 at 1:50 PM of the St. [NAME]'s A medication cart with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADNS) identified the December Change of Shift Inventory Record for Required Drugs sheet (the controlled drug reconciliation form that the on-coming and off-going nurses complete to ensure controlled drugs are counted) were missing signatures on the following dates: A. 12/3/24: 7:30 AM to 3:00 PM off-going, 3:30 PM to 11:00 PM off-going B. 12/4/24: 7:30 AM to 3:00 PM off-going, 3:30 PM to 11:00 PM off-going C. 12/6/24: 7:30 AM to 3:00 PM on-coming and off-going, 11:30 PM to 7:00 AM off-going D. 12/8/24: 7:30 AM to 3:00 PM off-going, 3:30 PM to 11:00 PM on-coming and 11:30 PM to 7:00 AM off-going Interview with LPN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of the clinical record, and facility policy for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #57) reviewed for food and nutrition, the facility failed to assist a dependent resident with menu selection. The findings include: Resident #57 was admitted to the facility in July of 2023 and had diagnoses that included legal blindness, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and feeding difficulties A provider order dated 12/12/23 directed a regular diet, regular texture with an allergy to eggs and egg derivates. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #57 was cognitively intact (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13), required set up assistance for eating, and was dependent for toileting, bathing, and transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/30/24 identified Resident #57 had impaired visual function related to legal blindness. Interventions included reviewing medications for side effects which affect vision and telling the resident where their items…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #85 and Resident #98) reviewed for infection control, the facility failed to identify and document vaccination status and offer vaccinations for resdients newly admitted to the facility. The findings include: 1. Resident #85 was admitted to the facility in October of 2024, with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, Asthma and Osteoporosis. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #85 was severely cognitively impaired (Brief Interview for Metal status (BIMS) score of 3). Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) immunization record identified that a Moderna Covid-19 vaccine was administered on 11/18/24 and an Influenza vaccine was administered on 12/9/24 but failed to identify if a Pneumovax vaccine was offered, refused or administered. The facility failed to identify any documentation of a Vaccine…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,065 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $13,065 — penalty dated 2026-04-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 52 rows in the source record cover these 27 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT