Autumn Lake Healthcare At Windsor
581 Poquonock Ave, Windsor, CT 06095 · For profit - Corporation · 108 certified beds · (860) 688-7211 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $190,822 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-11)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.7% | 18.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.5% | 6.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 29.9% | 22.3% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.5% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.4% | 16.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.4% | 17.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.5% | 4.0% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.6% | 24.7% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.6% | 17.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.8% | 69.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.6% | 24.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.2% | 10.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.51 | 2.06 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.05 | 1.46 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 56 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.8%CMS range 34.5–57.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.0%CMS range 5.9–13.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 3.4–13.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.98 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 99.8 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 3 of 5 residents (Resident's #93, #23 and #99) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure Resident #93 was free from verbal and physical abuse by his/her roommate Resident #41, and failed to ensure Resident 23 and 99, who were roommates, were free from abuse from each other. The findings include: 1a. Resident #93 was admitted to the facility in May 2024 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, psychosis, and adjustment disorder. The clinical record identified Resident #41 had a room change to Resident #93's room on 3/13/25. The care plan dated 4/28/25 identified Resident #93 had potential for impaired thought processes related to difficulty expressing him/herself. Interventions included communicating with the resident and his/her resident representative regarding his/her needs. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #93 had intact cognition. A psychiatric supportive services note by SW #3 on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure social service support visits were provided timely after an allegation of abuse. The findings include: Resident # 1's diagnoses included heart failure, anxiety and depression. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of twelve out of fifteen, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent with toilet hygiene, ADLs, transfers, manual wheelchair use, and partial/moderate assistance with bed mobility, and had no behaviors (no hallucinations or delusions) in the prior seven (7) days. Psychiatric APRN note dated 12/31/2025 indicated asked to see patient urgently via telehealth for eval. Resident #1 alleged a man I grew up with came in my room on a gurney and touched my ankle and leg. I think he was trying to rape me. No…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-11 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure accurate staffing data was entered in the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) during FY Quarter 4 2025 (July1 -[DATE]). The findings include: Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report dated FY Quarter 4 2025 (July1 -[DATE]) identified that the facility triggered for a one star staffing rating, no RN hours on the following dates: 9/19/25, 9/20/25, 9/22/25, 9/23/25, 9/24/25, 9/25/25, 9/26/25, 9/27/25, 9/29/25, and 9/30/25, and failure to have licensed nurse coverage 24 hours/day on the following dates: 9/19/25, 9/20/25, 9/22/25, 9/23/25, 9/24/25, 9/25/25, 9/26/25, 9/27/25, 9/29/25, and 9/30/25. Review of the Daily Staffing documents dated: 9/19/25, 9/20/25, 9/22/25, 9/23/25, 9/24/25, 9/25/25, 9/26/25, 9/27/25, 9/29/25, and 9/30/25 identified the facility did have RN coverage and licensed nurse coverage 24 hours a day. Interview with the Regional Administrator/Director on 2/27/26 at 12:30 PM identified that the PBJ data submitted for FY…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 3 of 3 residents, (Resident #12, 69 and 79) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) and who were unable to care for themselves, the facility failed provide basic care including bathing and toileting between 7:00 AM - 12:00 PM after the nurse aide assigned to provide care was reassigned and that information was not communicated to other staff. The findings include:1. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in August 2025 with diagnoses that included stroke and dementia.The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #7 was severely cognitively impaired, required two person assist with bed mobility, transfers and toileting needs, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, was at risk for the development of pressure ulcers and had no unhealed pressure ulcer.The care plan dated 12/3/25 identified Resident #12 had a potential or actual skin integrity impairment and potential problem with urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy, facility assessment, and interviews, for 5 of 5 nurse aides (NA #8, 15, 16, 17, and 18) and 2 of 2 licensed nurses (LPN #5 and #8), reviewed for sufficient and competent nurse staffing, the facility failed to ensure the staff had demonstrated competencies necessary to care for resident's needs, from the last standard survey ([DATE]) through the change of ownership of the facility on [DATE]. The findings include: Review of NA #8's personnel file identified that he/she was hired in [DATE]. The personnel file failed to identify documentation that annual competencies had been demonstrated from the last standard survey [DATE]. After the facility changed ownership on [DATE], NA #8 completed an in-service on the 2026-2027 mandatory education on [DATE]. Review of NA #15's personnel file identified that he/she was hired in [DATE]. The personnel file failed to identify documentation that annual competencies had been demonstrated from the last standard survey…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-11 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 5 nurse aides (NA #8, 15, 16, 17, and 18) received a performance evaluation at least once every 12 months, from the last standard survey (3/12/24) through 2/24/26. The findings include: Review of NA #8's personnel file identified that he/she was hired in August 202. The personnel file failed to identify documentation that an annual performance evaluation was completed from 3/12/24 through 2/24/26. Review of NA #15's personnel file identified that he/she was hired in October 2018. The personnel file failed to identify documentation that an annual performance evaluation was completed from 3/12/24 through 2/24/26.Review of NA #16's personnel file identified that he/she was hired in September 2007. The personnel file failed to identify documentation that an annual performance evaluation was completed from 3/12/24 through 2/24/26.Review of NA #17's personnel file identified that he/she was hired in [NAME]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interview the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was not 5 percent or greater. The findings include. During the recertification survey 2/24/26 - 2/27/26 the survey team observed 5 residents during medication administration with 35 opportunities for errors. There were 3 observed medication errors making the medication error rate 8.57%. 1. Resident #19 was admitted to the facility in October 2020, diagnosis included with diagnoses that included hypothyroidism.Physician's order dated 2/21/26 directed to administer Levothyroxine 112mcg daily, Vitamin C 500mg daily, Vitamin D 25mg daily, and Ferrous Sulfate Oral Solution 300 (60 Fe) mg/ml give 5ml daily.a. Observation during medication administration on 2/26/26 at 10:04 AM identified that LPN #4 administered Levothyroxine 112mcg, Vitamin C 500mg, Iron (Ferrous Sulfate) tablet 325mg/65mg (medication error), and Vitamin D 25mg. b. Review of the Levothyroxine blister pack on 2/26/26 (used by LPN #6 to administer the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of facility policy, and interviews, for 4 of 4 medication carts, the facility failed to maintain medication carts in a clean and sanitary manner. The findings include:a. Observation of the medication cart on Center South on 2/25/26 at 1:30 PM with DNS, RN #2 (Vice President of Clinical Operations), and LPN #1 identified an accumulation of loose medication pills and/or blister pack back covers at the bottom of fifth drawer. Interview on 2/25/26 at 1:30 PM with LPN #1 indicated she was not aware of the loose medication pills and/or blister pack back covers at bottom of medication drawer. LPN #1 indicated it is the responsibility of all the nurses to keep the medication cart clean at all times. b. Observation of the medication cart on Center North on 2/25/26 at 1:59 PM with DNS, RN #2 (Vice President of Clinical Operations) and LPN # 2 identified an accumulation of loose medication pills and/or blister pack back covers at the bottom of fifth drawer. Interview on 2/25/26 at 1:59 PM with LPN #2 indicated she was not aware of the loose medication pills and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation review of facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident designated water pitches were clean and sanitized routinely. The findings include:Interview with Resident #23 on 2/24/26 at 8:36 AM identified water pitchers were not routinely cleaned and instead, reused daily. Resident #23 had previously complained to staff (unidentified), but the practice continued.Observation on 2/24/26 at 8:36 AM identified an ice cooler on a utility cart at the end of the hall, with no clean water pitchers. Various staff lifted the lid using an ice scooper inside to obtain ice to fill water pitchers before returning to a resident room, with one staff member filling three unmarked water pitchers before heading down the hall towards the resident rooms.Observation on 2/25/26 at 7:04 AM identified the ice cooler at the end of the hall, no clean pitchers.Observation on 2/25/26 at 9:34 AM identified a staff member scooping ice into a water pitcher and returning to a resident room.Observation on 2/26/25 at 10:25 AM identified the ice cooler at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-11 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an antibiotic stewardship program was in place that included a standardized tool for infection surveillance and a system for periodic review, from the last standard survey (3/12/24) through the change of ownership (11/1/25). The findings include: Review of the Antibiotic Stewardship binder with documentation dated 3/1/25 through 2/23/26 failed to identify, that from 3/1/25 through 10/31/25, the facility was using a standardized tool when assessing residents for infection and failed to identify that a feedback system was in place for educating prescribing practitioners on their antibiotic utilization patterns and facility infection rates. Review of November 2025, December 2025, and January 2026 (February 2026 in process) Monthly Infection Reports identified infection surveillance, broken down by body systems and percentages rates, was being tracked. During an interview with the MDS Coordinator/Interim Staff Development and Infection Control Nurse (LPN #6) and the Regional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-11 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to designate an infection preventionist (IP) at least part time to monitor the facility infection control program. The findings include:Review of the facility infection control program identified there no designated IP.Interview and facility documentation review with the Administrator on 2/24/26 at 2:03 PM identified that no designated IP had been assigned since 1/19/23. Various staff had intermittently assisted, including LPN #6, employed since November 2025 and the DNS who was recently certified on 2/7/26. The Administrator indicated there were ongoing efforts to recruit for the position; however, facility documentation identified the position had been posted on just one occasion, 10/22/25. The Administrator further identified a candidate was hired for the position and was anticipated to begin on 3/4/26. The Administrator was unable to provide documentation through schedules or punch records demonstrating designated time for the management infection control program or LPN #6's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-11 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy, facility assessment, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 5 nurse aides (NA #8, 15, 16, 17, and 18) reviewed for sufficient and competent nurse staffing, completed the minimum required 12-hours of in-service education, annually, from the last standard survey (3/12/24) through the change of ownership (11/1/25). The findings include: Review of NA #8's personnel file identified that he/she was hired in August 2021. The personnel file failed to identify documentation that the minimum required 12-hours of in-service education had been completed between the last standard survey, 3/12/24 and 1/31/26, 22 months. Review of NA #15's personnel file identified that he/she was hired in October 2018. The personnel file failed to identify documentation that the minimum required 12-hours of in-service education had been completed between the last standard survey, 3/12/24 and 12/29/25, 21 months. Review of NA #16's personnel file identified that he/she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #16 and 110) reviewed for grievances, the facility failed to ensure the residents were treated in a respectful and dignified manner. The findings included: 1. Resident #16 was admitted to the facility in January 2026 with diagnoses that included muscle wasting and atrophy, dementia, history of falling, and congestive heart failure.The care plan dated 1/16/26 identified Resident #16 had a self-care performance deficit. Interventions included providing assistance in completing ADL tasks as needed, offer toileting every 2-3 hours while awake and staff to check for incontinence and assist with changes routinely and as needed.The resident grievance form dated 1/21/26 identified Resident #16 indicated he/she requested a blanket on 1/20/26 at 4:00 PM which was not provided until the following morning by another staff member. Resident #16 also indicated he/she requested a bedpan and was informed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #99) reviewed for resident rights, the facility failed to honor the residents request for a room change due to negative interactions with his/her roommate. Subsequently, the resident and his/her roommate had a resident-to-resident altercation. The findings include:Resident #99 was admitted to the facility in December 2022 with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder and dementia.The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #99 was moderately cognitively impaired and independent with bed mobility, transfers and ambulation.The care plan dated 10/19/25 identified Resident #99 had an actual mood problem related to dementia, schizoaffective disorder and anxiety. Interventions included monitoring mood, providing supportive psychotherapy and administering medications as ordered.Review of the grievances included a handwritten note from Resident #99 to an unidentified staff member…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #93) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to notify the physician and the resident representative of verbal and physical abuse by Resident #41 and for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #74 and 90) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to notify the physician of a significant weight gain in a timely manner. The findings include: 1a. Resident #41 was admitted to the facility in September 2004 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, dementia, and anxiety disorder. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #41 had moderately impaired cognition. A nurse's note dated 7/7/25 at 7:34 AM by LPN #5 (11:00 PM – 7:00 AM charge nurse) identified Resident #41 was observed at 5:00 AM having a verbal altercation with his/her roommate (Resident #93). LPN #5 identified the altercation occurred without a reason, and that Resident #41 continued with behaviors despite attempts at redirection, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #93, 23 and 99) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the state agency according to regulatory requirement and facility policy. The findings include: 1a. Resident #41 was admitted to the facility in September 2004 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, dementia, and anxiety disorder. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #41 had moderately impaired cognition. A nurse's note dated 7/7/25 at 7:34 AM by LPN #5 (11:00 PM – 7:00 AM charge nurse) identified Resident #41 was observed at 5:00 AM having a verbal altercation with his/her roommate. LPN #5 identified the altercation occurred without a reason, and that Resident #41 continued with behaviors despite attempts at redirection, and that Resident #41 was observed yelling at other residents in the unit hallway. The note further identified that Resident #41 was observed by 3 facility staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #93, 23 and 99) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated and the residents protected from future abuse. The findings include: 1a. Resident #41 was admitted to the facility in September 2004 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, dementia, and anxiety disorder. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #41 had moderately impaired cognition. A nurse's note dated 7/7/25 at 7:34 AM by LPN #5 (11:00 PM – 7:00 AM charge nurse) identified Resident #41 was observed at 5:00 AM having a verbal altercation with his/her roommate. LPN #5 identified the altercation occurred without a reason, and that Resident #41 continued with behaviors despite attempts at redirection, and that Resident #41 was observed yelling at other residents in the unit hallway. The note further identified that Resident #41 was observed by 3 facility staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 4 residents (Resident #3, 8, 74, and 107) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to ensure the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified in accordance with regulatory requirements when the residents were transferred to the hospital. The findings include: 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in June 2017 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease.A nurse's note dated 10/2/25 identified that at 12:20 AM Resident #3 was transferred to the hospital and was readmitted on [DATE]. A nurse's note dated 11/11/25 at 1:19 PM identified Resident #3 was transferred to the hospital and readmitted on [DATE]. A nurse's note dated 11/19/25 at 3:11 PM identified Resident #3 was transferred to the hospital and readmitted on [DATE]. 2. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizophrenia. A nurse's note dated 9/12/25 at 4:34 PM identified Resident #8 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interview for 1 of 3 residents, (Resident #7) reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review, PASARR, the facility failed ensure a reassessment was completed following the identification of a suspected mental illness. The findings include:Resident #7 was admitted to the facility in August 2019 with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder and dementia.Level I PASARR dated 7/24/19, completed during hospitalization prior to admission to the facility, identified Resident #7 did not have a diagnosis of a major mental illness and no further level I screening was required unless suspected of a serious mental illness (MI) or intellectual disability (ID) and exhibits a significant change in treatment needs.Psychiatric consultations beginning 11/15/19 noted a diagnosis code for of schizoaffective disorder (F25.9) with history auditory hallucinations previously treated while hospitalized , with chronic management including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #41) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's care plan was revised, and interventions were implemented following resident-to-resident altercations. The findings include: Resident #41 was admitted to the facility in September 2004 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, dementia, and anxiety disorder. A physician's order dated 7/15/22 directed behavior monitoring for yelling, delusions, pacing, or weeping every shift including the behavior and number of episodes. A physician's order dated 8/16/24 directed to administer Risperdal (an anti-psychotic medication used to treat schizophrenia) 1 mg tablet every 12 hours. Review of the clinical record identified Resident #41 had a room change to Resident #93's room on 3/13/25. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #41 had moderately impaired cognition, was always continent of bowel and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interview for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #19) observed during medication administration, the facility failed to administer Levothyroxine according to professional standards. The findings include. Resident #19 was admitted to the facility in October 2020, diagnosis included with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder and hypothyroidism.Physician's order dated 2/7/25 directed to administer Levothyroxine 112mcg for hypothyroidism daily. The February 2026 MAR identified that between 2/1/26 - 2/19/26 the Levothyroxine was being administered daily at 6:30 AM.The clinical record identified Resident #19 was hospitalized on [DATE] and returned to the facility on 2/21/26.Physician's order dated 2/21/26 directed to administer Levothyroxine 112mcg daily, Vitamin C 500mg daily, Vitamin D 25mg daily, and Ferrous Sulfate Oral Solution 300 (60 Fe) mg/ml give 5ml daily.The February 2026 MAR identified that between 2/22/26 -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 3 residents (Residents #93, 57 and 4) the facility failed to provide care according to professional standards. For 1 of 5 residents (Resident #93) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to complete an RN assessment after a witnessed resident to resident altercation. For 1 of 2 residents (Resident #57) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's heels were offloaded per the physician's order. For 1 of 5 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to consult the outside cardiologist for the resident regarding his/her implanted medical device. The findings include: 1a. Resident #41 was admitted to the facility in September 2004 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, dementia, and anxiety disorder. A physician's order dated 7/15/22 directed behavior monitoring for yelling, delusions, pacing, or weeping every shift including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #57, 90 and 74) reviewed for pressure ulcers and/or nutrition, for Resident #57, reviewed for pressure ulcers, the dietitian did not complete a nutritional assessment for 1 month, until surveyor inquiry, after a new wound was identified, for Resident #90, reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to address a significant weight loss in a timely manner and for Resident #74, reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to obtain a reweight for 2 weeks after the resident had a significant weight gain. The findings include: 1. Resident #57 was admitted to the facility in October 2023 with diagnoses that included hypertensive urgency, muscle weakness, and bilateral osteoarthritis of the knees. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #57 had moderately impaired cognition, was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder and required substantial assistance by staff with toileting,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 4 medication carts, the facility failed to ensure shift to shift controlled drug counts were consistently completed. The findings include:Observation on 2/25/26 at 2:10 PM during the medication cart review (on the South unit) with the DNS included a review of the February 2026 controlled drugs shift count record (the on-coming and off-going nurses complete to ensure all controlled drugs are counted). The controlled drugs shift count record was missing 4 signatures on 2 shifts on 2/24/26 during the 7:00 AM - 3:00 PM and 3:00 PM - 11:00 PM shift. Interview with the DNS on 2/25/26 at 2:15 PM identified she was not aware of the missing controlled drugs shift count signatures until now. The DNS indicated it was the responsibility of all the nurses to sign the controlled drugs count record at the beginning of the shift and at the end of each shift when the controlled drugs count is completed. The DNS indicated she will provide in-service for the nursing staff.Review of the facility controlled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure dental services with an oral surgeon were scheduled in timely manner. The findings include: Resident #6 was admitted to the facility in January 2022 with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, schizophrenia, and dementia. The physician's order dated 10/28/25 directed to arrange with outpatient oral surgeon for dental extraction. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 had moderately impaired cognition, broken or loosely fitting full or partial denture, and obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. The care plan dated 12/3/25 identified Resident #6 had oral/dental health problems related to cavities, with interventions that included coordinating arrangements for dental care, transportation as needed/as ordered, monitoring/documenting/reporting to the MD, as needed, signs and symptoms of oral/dental problems…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews 2 residents (Resident #57 and 90) who were reviewed for wounds, the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) as per facility policy and professional standards. The findings include: Resident #57 was admitted to the facility in October 2023 with diagnoses that included hypertensive urgency, muscle weakness, and bilateral osteoarthritis of the knees. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #57 had moderately impaired cognition, was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder and required substantial assistance by staff with toileting, dressing, and transfers. A weekly wound assessment note dated 1/21/26 identified that Resident #57 was found to have a new facility acquired stage 3 pressure ulcer on the plantar surface of the left foot which measured 1.6 cm x 1.1 cm by 0.2 cm. A telemedicine initial wound care note dated 1/21/26 by MD #2 (Wound care physician) identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #4 and 6) reviewed for immunizations, the facility failed to ensure the pneumococcal vaccine was administered in a timely manner. The findings include: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in April 2023 with diagnoses that included heart failure, dementia, and hypertension. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #4 had severely impaired cognition and was not up to date on the pneumococcal vaccination; it was offered and declined. Review of Resident #4's Immunization Report identified Pneumococcal-Historical Type Unknown was administered on 3/20/24. The Resident Pneumonia Vaccine Education Document Form signed and dated 2/5/26 identified Resident #4 agreed to receive the Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV 20). 2. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility in January 2022 with diagnoses that included dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and COPD. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 4 of 5 residents (Resident #4, 6, 8, and 99) reviewed for immunizations, the facility failed to ensure Covid-19 booster vaccines were administered in a timely manner. The findings include: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in April 2023 with diagnoses that included heart failure, dementia, and hypertension. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #4 had severely impaired cognition and was not up to date on the Covid-19 vaccination. Review of Resident #4's Immunization Report identified the most recent SARS-COV-2 COVID-19 vaccine had been administered on 1/26/24. The Resident Covid Vaccine Education Document Form signed and dated 2/5/26 identified Resident #4 agreed to receive the Covid-19 booster vaccine. 2. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility in January 2022 with diagnoses that included dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and COPD. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who required set-up assistance from staff with personal hygiene and toileting, the facility failed to ensure a staff member did not verbalize profanity towards the resident. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included vascular dementia, anxiety, depression, and coronary vascular accident with right sided weakness. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had no memory recall deficits, was oriented to person, place, time, and situation, required supervision from staff for toileting, personal hygiene, bed mobility, transfers and self-propelled while in a wheelchair. The Resident Care Plan dated 5/9/25 identified Resident #1 had a self-care deficit and was hard of hearing. Interventions directed to assist with care as needed, ensure resident was aware of staff presence before providing care, and use facial expressions to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #30) reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a newly identified non-pressure skin condition(s) in a timely manner. The findings include: Resident #30 diagnoses included muscle weakness and seborrheic dermatitis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #30 had moderate cognitive impairment, required partial to moderate assistance with bed mobility, transfers, one person assist with locomotion with the use of a wheelchair and had no unhealed pressure or non-pressure skin injuries. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/5/23 identified Resident #30 had the potential for skin integrity issues related to fragile skin, incontinent episodes of bowel and bladder, seborrheic dermatitis, and limited mobility. Interventions directed to keep skin clean and dry, use lotion on dry scaly skin and use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility documentation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that foods were stored and prepared under sanitary conditions. The findings included: During tour and observation of the kitchen with the [NAME] #2 on 2/25/24 at 10:20 AM revealed the following: 1. Tray with clean coffee mugs to be used for lunch was on the counter next to the hand washing sink and above the sink divider. Above the tray with cups was a single electric outlet covered with dust and caked in dirt. The wall behind the electrical outlet was dirty and damaged with a hole above the outlet. The conduit was rusty, with marred and/or chipped paint and with grime or dust. There was a rust-colored liquid dripping on the conduit. On the side of the sink and above the conduit was a soap dispenser that was dripping down after use. The hand sink had dry grime on the upper part and soiled wet cloth was stored on the side. Cook #2 identified at the time of observation that coffee mugs should be stored away from the handwashing sink to prevent any possible splatter. 2. The metal shelves storing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-12 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — patternHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation and interviews for 4 of 5 residents, (Resident 23, #28, #49 and #498) reviewed for quarterly social service review, the facility failed to conduct quarterly social service visits timely. The findings include: 1. Resident #23 ' s diagnoses included Respiratory Failure, Essential Hypertension, and Alcoholic Cirrhosis of liver with ascites. A physician's order dated 9/25/21 directed to monitor symptoms and signs such as malaise, dizziness, diarrhea, sore throat, oxygen desaturation, loss of appetite, or mental status changes. Particular attention should be made to identify sudden changes in behavior and temperature greater than 100 degrees F every day/shift. The Resident Care Plan dated 10/22/21 with a revision date of 5/3/22 identified Resident #23 had a BIMS less than 13. Interventions included social services to provide emotional support, assessment, and intervention as needed. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy for 1 of 3 bathrooms, the facility failed to ensure resident care equipment was stored in a sanitary manner according to infection control practices and for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #30) reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions, the facility failed to ensure wound care was performed in accordance with infection control standards regarding hand hygiene. The findings included: 1. Observation on 2/25/24 at 11:29 AM of resident's bathroom of rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] on North Wing identified two sets of gray color wash basins stacked on top of each other and stored on the floor under the sink by to the garbage container. One wash basin had a small amount of soapy liquid. All four wash basins were uncovered and without resident name. Further observation identified a grey color bedpan stored on the floor by the toilet. The bedpan had some light color dried debris inside, was uncovered and without resident name on it. Four residents shared this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical records, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 10 sampled residents (Resident #26) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was revised to reduce the risk of further physical mistreatment following a resident-to-resident physical altercation where Resident #70 was the victim. For 2 of 6 residents, (Resident #30 and #42), the facility failed to revise the care plan following a newly developed non pressure injury For Resident #43, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised in atimely manner following an allegation of abuse. The findings include: 1. Resident #26's diagnoses included borderline personality disorder and anxiety. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #26 as cognitively intact, did not express any indicators of psychosis, required one person assist with bed mobility, transfers and was independent with locomotion with the use of a wheelchair. The RCP dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident # 78) reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to ensure that other state agencies were notified of the resident's decision to (Leave Against Medical Advice). The finding included: Resident # 78's diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, nutritional deficiency, and repeated falls. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 78 had intact cognition, used a rolling walker for mobility, and noted frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The care plan dated 3/25/24 identified a concern with Resident #78's desire for long term care Intervention included: to evaluate motivation of the resident to remain in facility long term care, to discuss feelings and concerns with her/his expressed desire for long term care, and to monitor for and address episodes of anxiety, fear, and distress. The Advanced Practiced Registered Nurse (APRN) assessment dated [DATE] identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #46) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The facility failed to follow the resident plan of care. The findings include: Resident #46 's diagnoses included vascular dementia, malnutrition, and feeding difficulties. The physician's orders dated 10/18/23 directed ADL care as total assist at bed level and extensive assistance for feeding. The care plan with revision date of 11/26/23 identified Resident #46 has an ADL self-care performance deficit related diagnosis of dementia, occasional back pain, weakness, abnormal posture, and feeding difficulties. Resident #46 's goals for this focus included: will maintain current level of function in transfers, eating, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene through the next review date. Interventions dated 3/9/23 with a revision date of 11/26/23 included total assistance with ADLs at bed level, extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy and interview for 1 of 3 sampled residents ( Resident # 51) at risk for pressure ulcer development, the facility failed to perform a weekly skin assessments as directed in the plan of care. The finding include: Resident #51's diagnoses included generalized muscle weakness, orthostatic hypotension (a form of low blood pressure that happens when you stand up from sitting or lying down), and high cholesterol. The care plan revises dated 12/26/23 identified Resident #51 had a reopened area to coccyx, start date of 11/24/23 with the goal to include area to sacrum will be resolved without complications by next review, resolved on 12/26/23. The care plan failed to identify the new wound to the right buttock. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #51 was severely cognitively impaired and required maximal assistance for eating and oral hygiene and was dependent on toileting, dressing and personal hygiene. The MDS further indicated Resident #51 was at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident # 275) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to assist implement a bowel retraining program when the resident was identified as a good candidate for retraining. The findings include: Resident #275's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and irritable bowel syndrome without diarrhea. A physician's order dated 3/8/24 directed to monitor bowel patterns every shift for 3 days. The facility's Bladder and Bowel Program Screener dated 3/8/24 identified Resident #275 was incontinent of stool 1-3 times a week categorized as a 'good candidate for retraining'. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #275 had moderately impaired cognition, was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, utilized a walker for mobility, and required substantial/maximal assistance with toileting, helper performs more than half of the effort and noted difficulty hearing. Additionally, the assessment notes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, review of facility policy and staff interviews for 1 of 1 resident, (Resident #20), reviewed for specialized treatment, the facility failed to ensure that the specialized treatment communication log was consistently completed before the resident left for the specialized treatments. The findings include: Resident #20 was admitted on [DATE] to the facility. The resident diagnoses included. dementia, end-stage kidney disease requiring specialized treatment. The clinical record also noted the utilization of an acquired arteriovenous (AV) fistula on the left arm, which is a surgically created connection of a vein and artery that is used to connect the specialized machine. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #20 had severe cognitive impairment and required partial to moderate assistance with eating, toileting, and personal hygiene. A care plan dated 2/6/24 identified Resident #20 received specialized treatment on Mondays, Wednesdays, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for dental, the facility failed to arrange dental appointment and assist with transportation timely. The findings include: Resident #7 's diagnoses included, Immuno- compromised, Stage 3 chronic kidney disease and schizophrenia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #7 was cognitively intact and independent in ADL. The MDS further identified Resident #7 experiences mouth or facial pain, discomfort, or difficulty with chewing. The care plan dated 2/9/24 indicated Resident #7 has oral/dental health problems related to partially edentulous, no upper teeth. Interventions include coordinating arrangements for dental care, transportation as needed and as ordered. A physician's order dated 11/4/22 directed to monitoring pain using verbal/non-verbal cues. A nurse's note dated 2/17/24 at 10:09 AM identified Resident # 7 complained of pain to right lower back…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #248) reviewed for food quality, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a severe seafood allergy did not receive fish during a meal. The findings include: Resident #248's diagnosis included congestive heart failure and respiratory failure. A physician's order dated 2/16/24 directing to provide an Epi-Pen 2 Pak Injectable solution (epinephrine) auto injector 0.3mg/0.3 ml inject 3 ml intramuscularly as needed for anaphylaxis. The care plan dated 2/16/24 indicated resident #248 could self-administer an Epi-pen to treat a severe or life-threatening allergic reaction with interventions that included to assist reside to secure medication after administration as needed, educate on proper storage of the drug to prevent unauthorized access and side effects of medication as needed. A nurses note dated 2/16/2024 at 6:56 PM indicated Resident #248 had an allergy to any seafood which caused an anaphylactic reaction was given an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #30) reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record for a resident with newly identified non- pressure wound(s). The findings include: Resident #30's diagnoses included muscle weakness and seborrheic dermatitis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #30 as moderately cognitively impaired, required partial to moderate assistance with bed mobility and transfers. The resident also required one person assist with locomotion with the use of a wheelchair and had no unhealed pressure or non-pressure skin injuries. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/5/23 identified Resident #30 had the potential for skin integrity issues related to fragile skin, incontinent episodes of bowel and bladder, seborrheic dermatitis, and limited mobility. Interventions included keeping skin clean and dry, using lotion on dry scaly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of facility documentation, facility policy review and interviews for one of three nursing units ( South Unit) review of the Controlled Drug Count Record Sheet (CDCRS) for reconciliation, the facility failed to consistently reconcile or sign off on the CDCRS for controlled medications every shift. The findings included: Observation by the surveyor on 12/1/2021 at 8:15 AM on the South Unit during medication administration by RN #1 identified after RN # 1 signed out a narcotic. Surveyor reviewed of the Controlled Drug -Count Record Sheet, for November 2021 identified 2 out of 28 occasions where the licensed staff nurses failed to sign or initial the Controlled Drug Count Record as an oncoming or an off going nurse. Further observation of the December 1, 2021, Controlled Drug -Count Record Sheet with RN #1 identified a blank space for count for 11-7 A.M. shift. RN #1 indicated she forgot to sign and immediately initial the 11-7 AM 12/1/21 Controlled Drug -Count Record Sheet. Interview with RN #1 on 12/1/21 at 8:25 AM identified that she always signs the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility policy and interviews for one of three residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #341) failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care for the resident's Leave of Absence (LOA) and for one of three residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (Resident #11), the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan consistent with resident's participation in treatment. The findings included: 1.Resident #341 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included viral meningitis and hearing loss. An admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident as cognitively intact, clear speech, without behaviors. and independent for all activities of daily living. The physician's admission orders dated 10/29/21 directed (resident) may go independent Leave of Absence (LOA). A second physician's order dated 10/29/21 directed (resident) may go on LOA with wife or son for three hours. The nurse's progress notes dated 10/31/21 at 12:20…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility policy and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #3) reviewed for ADL, the facility failed to provide care per resident's preferences. The findings include: Resident #3's diagnoses included cerebral infarction, sickle-cell, hemiplegia and hemiparesis and paralytic syndrome. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with two or more people for physical assist and the resident was identified to have a tracheostomy. The care plan identified 11/2021 identified the resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit related to bedfast, deteriorating physical condition, limited mobility and stroke. Resident requires caregiver to be able to assist resident to perform grooming, dressing and bathing. Interventions include resident in dependent on staff for foley care and ostomy management. Wheelchair positioning plan 24 hours. Out of bed to specialized wheelchair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation and interviews for one resident (Resident #3) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed obtain active physician's order for the resident's tracheostomy. The findings include: Resident #3's diagnoses included cerebral infarction, sickle-cell, hemiplegia and hemiparesis and paralytic syndrome. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with two or more people for physical assist and indicated the resident was noted utilizing a tracheostomy. The hospitalization Intra- Agency Discharge summary dated [DATE] at 12:30PM identified Resident #3's tracheostomy was originally a #8 Shiley but was subsequently changed at the hospital to a #7 Portex. Interview with RN #2 on 11/30/21 at 11:30AM identified she was unable to verify the size and type of the tracheostomy. RN #2 identified RN #4 would know the correct size and type. Interview with RN #4 on 11/30/21 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-03-11 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interview for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #38, 68, 79 and 110) reviewed for beneficiary notification, the facility failed to provide the appropriate Medicare denial notices to the resident's upon being discharged from Medicare Part A with benefit days remaining. The findings include: Upon surveyor request, the facility provided a list of residents who were discharged from Medicare covered Part A stay with benefit days remaining in the past 6 months. Included in the facility provided list were Resident #38, 68, 79 and 110. The SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form was given to the facility staff with the request for the following information regarding Resident #38, 68, 79 and 110.How was the Medicare Part A service termination/discharge determined?Was a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) form CMS-10055 provided to the residents yes or no? If no, explain why the form was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 resident (Residents #6), reviewed for activity of daily living (ADL), the facility failed to ensure the resident's activity of daily living (ADL) were accurately coded in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. The findings include: Resident #6 was admitted to the facility in January 2022 with diagnoses that included dementia, paranoid schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder.The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 had moderately impaired cognition and required set up or clean-up assistance with eating, oral hygiene, shower/bath, upper body dressing, lower body dressing, putting on/taking off footwear, and personal hygiene, (inaccurately coded).The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 had moderately impaired cognition and was independent with eating, independent with oral hygiene, independent with toileting hygiene, supervision or touching assistance with shower/bath, independent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #6 and 99) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure the medical records reflected accurate documentation that blood glucose readings outside of the ordered parameters were reported to the physician. The findings include: 1. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility in January 2022 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type 2 diabetes mellitus, and dementia. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 had moderately impaired cognition, had received insulin injections insulin injections on 7 of the last 7 days, and was taking a hypoglycemic medication. The care plan dated 12/3/25 identified Resident #6 had Diabetes Mellitus and was refusing finger sticks and insulin, with interventions that included fasting serum blood sugar as ordered by the physician, and monitoring and reporting to the physician signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 3 of 3 residents (Residents # 7, 22 and 78) reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review ( PASRR) and for 1 of 3 residents (Resident # 59) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. The findings included: 1. Resident #7's diagnoses included schizophrenia, immune-compromised and Stage 3 chronic kidney disease. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #7 was cognitively intact and is independent in ADLs areas. MDS additionally indicated Resident #7 does not require a PASRR II (this signifies resident does not have a serious mental health diagnosis) The care plan dated 11/9/23 identified Resident #7 as at risk of potentially causing harm to him/herself and others. Interventions included monitoring signs and symptoms of agitation. Review of facility documentation indicated Resident # 7 had a PASRR Level II assessment with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2021-12-07 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #60 and Resident #89) reviewed for Resident Assessment, the facility failed to accurately reflect the resident's status on the assessment. The findings included: 1.Resident #89's diagnoses included urinary tract infection, major depressive disorder, diabetes mellitus type II and malignant neoplasm of prostate. The physician's order dated 5/02/18, with an end date identified on 5/10/18 directed Resident #89 to receive Lantus Solution 100 Unit/mL. Inject 20 units subcutaneously in the evening related to diabetes mellitus. The physician's order dated 5/10/18, with an end date identified on 5/24/18 directed Resident #89 to receive Lantus Solution 100 Unit/mL. Inject 10 units subcutaneously at bedtime related to diabetes mellitus. Resident # 89 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The 5-day MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 89 received insulin during the last 7 days. The quarterly MDS assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$190,822 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $171,390 — penalty dated 2026-03-11
- $19,432 — penalty dated 2024-03-12
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WINDSOR HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2016 |
| ALATISE, LARA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2016 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CT
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075011. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.