Bridgepoint Subacute And Rehab Capitol Hill
223 7th Street NE, Washington, DC 20002 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 117 certified beds · (202) 546-5700 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (79) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $112,756 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-06)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.7% | 20.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.2% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 4.2% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.1% | 1.4% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 6.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 1.3% | 0.5% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.1% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.3% | 16.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.7% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.9% | 97.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 21.0% | 7.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.0% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.6% | 8.0% | 17.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 0.8% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 54.5% | 73.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.56 | 1.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.47 | 0.55 | 1.80 | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 54% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.9%CMS range 30.9–66.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 7.2–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 86.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 21.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.4%CMS range 4.8–11.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.46 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 103.8 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.09 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.09 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.20 to 1.81 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
79 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 65 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. A policy titled, Smoking Policy with a review date of 12/2024 instructed in part, To protect the health, safety, and comfort of our residents, visitors, medical staff and employees . Bridge Point is a smoke free facility. Smoking may not occur with the facility. This policy is applicable to all employees, staff, visitors, and residents, both smokers and non-smokers. The information in this policy will be reviewed with all staff during orientation and on an annual basis .Residents receive information regarding policy during the admission process .Residents and visitor compliance with the policy is a shared responsibility of all Bridge Point employees and staff .The nursing facility acts to minimize the smoke (sp) to the greatest extent possible. The nursing facility will provide smoking jackets for resident use for safety . 2a. Resident #80 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Chronic Respiratory Failure, Muscle Weakness, and Difficulty Walking. A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for one (1) of 53 sampled residents, facility staff failed to order a wound consult and treatment for a resident who was observed with blisters on his right buttock. Subsequently, five (5) days later, the resident was observed with a Stage 3 pressure ulcer to his right buttock. Resident #38.The findings included: A review of the facility policy entitled Pressure Ulcer/Injury Assessment, reviewed 12/2025 that documented: Steps in the Procedure:Gather assessment tools and documentation and conduct the assessment in the manner most appropriate to the resident's condition and willingness to participate. If necessary, allow the resident to take rest periods during the assessment. Conduct a structured pressure ulcer/injury risk assessment using a facility-approved tool. Conduct a comprehensive skin assessment with every risk assessment. a.When conducting a skin assessment, provide for the resident's privacy. b.Once inspection of skin is completed document the findings on a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews and staff interviews for one (1) of 39 sampled residents, facility staff failed to consistently assess and document changes in the skin of Resident #47 who developed an in-house, acquired pressure injury/ulcer that was first identified at an advanced stage (Stage 3). (Resident #47) These failures resulted in actual harm to Resident #47. The findings include: A policy titled, Prevention of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries with a revision date of 05/24/24 instructed staff to, Inspect the skin on a daily basis when performing or assisting with personal care or ADLs (activities of daily living); Identify any signs of developing pressure injuries (i.e., non-blanchable erythema). For darkly pigmented skin, inspect for changes in skin tone, temperature, and consistency; Inspect pressure points (sacrum, heels, buttocks, coccyx, elbows, ischium, trochanter, etc.) .Moisturize dry skin daily; and Reposition resident as indicated on the care plan . 1. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-03-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff, and resident interviews, for one (1) of 53 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #266 was free from mental abuse and rough handling/physical abuse by a licensed practical nurse employed by the facility. These failures resulted in psychosocial harm to Resident #266. The findings include: Facility policy entitled Abuse Policy revised 07/2017 stipulates, Definitions .1.Abuse . the willful infliction of injury, unreasoned confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish .Includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of technology. Treatment/Management .the facility management and staff will institute measures to address the needs of residents and minimize the possibility of abuse and neglect . Resident #266 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses that included: Traumatic Subarachnoid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for one (1) of 53 sampled residents, facility staff failed to complete a thorough investigation for a facility-reported incident (FRI) that alleged a facility staff removed a 10-tablet blister pack of Resident #38's narcotic pain medication.The findings included:Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region Stage 4, Anoxic Brain Damage; Epilepsy; and Muscle Weakness.Review of the resident's medical record revealed the following:A physician's order dated 08/21/25 that directed: Tramadol (narcotic pain reliever) HCl oral tablet 50 mg (milligram), give 50 mg via PEG-Tube (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy tube) every 8 hours for moderate to severe pain.The Medication Administration Records (MAR) for August 2025 and September 2025 showed that facility staff documented that they administered Tramadol HCl oral tablet 50 mg via PEG-Tube (every 8 hours for moderate to severe pain at 2:00 AM, 10:00 AM, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 53 sampled residents, facility staff failed to revise and update Resident #112's care plan with goals and interventions to address a left medial lower leg and right knee abrasions. The findings included: Review of the facility's Pressure Ulcer/Injury Risk Assessment policy dated 05/24/24 documented in part: Develop the resident-centered care plan and interventions based on the risk factors identified in the assessments, the condition of the skin, the resident's overall clinical condition, and the resident's stated wishes and goals. The interventions must be based on current, recognized standards of care. The effects of the interventions must be evaluated. The care plan must be modified as the resident's condition changes, or if current interventions are deemed inadequate. Resident #112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Encephalopathy, Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation, record review, and staff and family interview, for one (1) of 53 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure that: (1) Resident 43's gown and linen were dry and free from stains, and incontinent care was provided in a timely manner. And (2) Resident #43 was turned and repositioned in a timely manner. (Resident #43)The findings included: Resident#43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident has a history of Cerebral Infarction, Muscle Weakness, and Stage 3 and Stage 4 Pressure Ulcers.A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented that the resident did not have a Brief Interview for Mental Status summary score, indicating the assessment was not conducted. The resident was coded for being dependent on staff for activities of daily living, always incontinent of bowel, having a urinary catheter, and having one Stage 3 and one Stage 4 pressure wound. 1. An observation on 04/29/26 at 10:20 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record review, staff interview, and family interview, the facility's staff failed to ensure that a resident with a tracheostomy was accompanied by nursing staff during a podiatry appointment for one of the 53 sampled residents. (Resident #43) Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses, including Aphasia, Chronic Respiratory Failure, Tracheostomy, and Muscle Weakness.A physician order with a re-order date of 01/31/26 instructed, On Trach collar: FI02:28%, Trach Type: [NAME], Trach Size: XL 7 every shift. Trach and suction care by a respiratory therapist and a nurse every shift.A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] showed that the resident did not have a Brief Interview for Mental Status summary score, indicating that the assessment was not conducted. Additionally, the resident was coded for requiring maximum staff assistance with all activities of daily living, tracheostomy care, and suctioning. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record review, staff interview, and family interview, the facility failed to ensure Employee #22 (CNA) did not remove a soiled sacral dressing and replace it with a clean gauze for one of 53 sampled residents. (Resident #43)Resident#43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident has a history of Cerebral Infarction, Muscle Weakness, and Stage 3 and Stage 4 Pressure Ulcers.A care plan with a review date of 12/18/25, documented in part, Focus [Resident #43 has pressure ulcers related to disease process (Chronic respiratory failure, chronic kidney disease, diabetes.immobility.Intervention- administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness [LPN, RN, or NP]. A wound assessment report dated 02/24/26 documented in part, Location-sacrum, measurements length 4.00 cm (centimeters), width-6.00 cm, depth 2.90 cm. Observation- Stage 4.A physician order with a reorder date of 03/03/26 instructed, Sacrum wound: Cleanse with wound cleanser,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, for one (1) of 53 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure proper storage of Resident #43's medication. The findings included:According to the manufacturer, Novo Nordisk, medical guidelines for Ozempic stated, Recommended Storage Conditions for Ozempic Single-patient-use pens (with multiple weekly doses): After first use of the Ozempic pen, the pen can be stored for 56 days at controlled room temperature 15 C to 30 C (59 F to 86 F) or in a refrigerator 2 C to 8 C (36 F to 46 F ).https://www.ozempic.comResident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Morbid (Severe) Obesity and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed:A physician's order dated 10/29/25 that directed: Ozempic 2 mg/(milligram)/ dose. Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 8 mg/3ml (milliliters) (Semaglutide). Inject 2 mg subcutaneously in the morning every Wed (Wednesday) for 90 days. Give…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-05 · tag F0942 — widespreadEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and staff interviews, facility staff failed to ensure that staff members were educated on the resident's rights and the facility's responsibilities to properly care for its residents, as set forth at §483.10, respectively. The findings included: A review of the Facility's Assessment updated 12/03/24, that documented: .Section 3.4 Staff Training/Education and Competencies. We only hire individuals that are eligible to work in The District of Columbia, currently using temporary nursing assistant(s). Department and job specific competencies are completed during orientation and reviewed annually. Competencies follow a pattern of requirements for certification and licensure renewal and trends of events within the facility and industry as a whole .List of competencies include- tracheostomy, ventilator, Enteral Tube feeding, ostomy, IVs (intravenous), TPN, (total parenteral nutrition) vital signs, weight taking, height measuring, oxygen, suctioning, systems assessment, turning and repositioning, SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Request) Communication Forms,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-05 · tag F0944 — widespreadConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and staff interviews, facility staff failed to provide training that outlined and informed staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program. The findings included: On 05/05/25, the facility's education and training records were reviewed as part of an extended survey. The facility provided a binder from the educator that included the education and training records for staff in the facility for review. Inside of the binder was a table of education topics with the heading, 2024 SNF (Shared Nursing Facility) Skills Fair Training. In the first column of the table was a list of several training topics including QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan and Participation. In the column next to QAPI were the comments, Review and packet. Attached to the Skills Fair Training document was a September 19-20-2024, 24-page sign-in sheet with the signatures of some staff who attended the skills fair training, however there was no documented evidence to show that the educator provided a review or a packet for QAPI to facility staff as part of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-05 · tag F0946 — widespreadProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and staff interviews, facility staff failed to provide a training program or another practical manner to effectively communicate the standards, policies, and procedures of the compliance and ethics program to its entire staff. The findings included: On 05/05/25, the facility's education and training records for its Compliance and Ethics program were reviewed as part of an extended survey. The facility provided a binder from the educator that included the education and training records for staff in the facility for review. Inside of the binder was a table of education topics with the heading, 2024 SNF (Shared Nursing Facility) Skills Fair Training. In the first column of the table was a list of several training topics including Compliance and Ethics. In the column next to Compliance and Ethics, were the comments, Review and packet. Attached to the Skills Fair Training document was a September 19-20-2024, 24-page sign-in sheet with the signatures of some staff who attended the skills fair training, however there was no documented evidence to show that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-05 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and staff interviews, facility staff failed to show documented evidence of its Required In-Service Training for Nurse Aides. The findings included: A review of the Facility's Assessment updated 12/03/24, that documented: .Section 3.4 Staff Training/Education and Competencies. We only hire individuals that are eligible to work in The District of Columbia, currently using temporary nursing assistant(s). Department and job specific competencies are completed during orientation and reviewed annually . On 05/05/25, the facility's education and training records for the required in-service training for Nurse Aides were reviewed as part of an extended survey. The facility provided a binder from the educator that included the education and training records for staff in the facility for review. The binder contained the following education and training provided by the educator for the facility's Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) in 2024: 1)Documentation news article and monthly test; No staff sign-in sheet was attached: (June); 2) Reporting to the Nurse, news article and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 65 citations
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-05 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — widespreadProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and staff interviews, facility staff failed to show documented evidence of an effective training program for all staff, which includes, at a minimum, training on behavioral health care and services for its residents. The findings included: On 05/05/25, the facility's education and training records for were reviewed as part of an extended survey. The facility provided a binder from the educator that included the education and training records for staff in the facility for review. The binder showed no documented evidence of an effective training program for all staff, which included, at a minimum, training on behavioral health care and services for its residents. During a face-to-face interview on 05/05/25 at 9:15 AM, Employee #48/ Regional Director of Operations, stated that the behavioral health care and services for residents is usually completed during staff orientation and as part of the staff skills fair training that the facility has annually. Employee #48, then reviewed the facility's staff education and training binder, and the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, five (5) of 49 residents sampled, facility staff failed to have documented evidence that they provided information to the residents and/or their representatives (RP) regarding their right to formulate or refuse an advanced directive. Residents #87, #56, #91, #74, and #73. The findings included: Review of the facility's Advanced Directives policy dated 05/24/24 documented: - Upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advanced directive if he or she chooses to do so. - If the resident is incapacitated and unable to receive information about his or her right to formulate an advance directive, the information may be provided to the resident's legal representative. - Information about whether or not the resident has executed an advance directive shall be displayed prominently in the medical record. - If the resident indicates that he or she has not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. Resident #91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Interstitial Pulmonary Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Respiratory Failure. Review of the resident's medical record revealed the following: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed that facility staff coded a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 13, indicating intact cognitive response. Physician's orders dated 02/10/15 directed, Established [central] line - Change dressing Q (every) 7 days, every night shift every Monday for IV-line care; Change dressing as needed if not intact or soiled as needed for IV care; Observe insertion site every shift for redness, warmth, swelling, drainage, coldness or irritation, every shift for IV care. Review of the April 2025 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) showed that on 04/07/25, facility staff documented a check mark and their initials to indicate that the resident's central IV-line dressing was changed during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and resident and staff interview, the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) failed ensure a resident was safe to self-administer an Albuterol inhaler for one (1) of 1 sampled resident who self-administer medicine. (Resident #46). The findings included: Resident #46 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Pulmonary Chronic Obstructive Disease, Bipolar, Schizophrenia, and Anxiety. A policy titled, Self-Administering Medications with a review date of 05/24/24 instructed, Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdispilinary team has determined that it is clincally appropiate and safe for the resident to do so . The staff and practitioner will assess each resident's mental and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medication is clincally appropiate for the resident .the nursing staff will determine who will be responsible (the resident or nursing staff) for document that medications were taken .medications must be stored in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff and family interviews, the facility failed to have documented evidence that verbal abuse of resident did not occur after receiving an allegation of staff-to-resident verbal abuse for one (1) of 1 sampled residents. (Resident #158) The findings included: Resident #158 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Altered Mental Status, Muscle Weakness, and Psychotic Disorder. During a telephone interview related to different concern (Complaint DC~12827) on 04/25/25 at approximately 10 AM, the resident daughter (complainant) stated that Employee #39 (CNA) said, My mom was pistol in front of my mom. After the employee said my mom was afraid and wanted to go home. The resident's daughter then said, I told her [Employee #39] that I would not tolerate any mistreatment of my mom. And then the employee said that she could tell I was from the streets. Additionally, the resident's daughter said that she made the Administrator aware and she never saw Employee #39 again. It…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews for one (1) of 49 sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide documented evidence that one resident's bedrails were not being used as a restraint for a non-ambulatory, cognitively impaired resident who required extensive assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Resident #308. The findings included: A facility document titled 'Physical Restraint Application' with a review date of October 2010 documented the following: Definition - Physical restraints are defined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body Documentation - The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: 1. The date and time the restraint was applied. 2. The name and title of the individual(s) who applied the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews for two (2) of 49 sampled residents, facility staff failed to report an incident of alleged staff-to-resident verbal abuse to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures. Residents #62 and #40 The findings included: A facility policy titled 'Abuse Investigation and Reporting' with a review date of 05/24/24 documented the following: Policy Statement - All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of abuse investigations will also be reported. Reporting - 2. An alleged violation of abuse, neglect,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for two (2) of 49 residents sampled, facility staff failed to have documented evidence that they conducted thorough investigations for one resident's missing cellphone and one resident's allegation of staff-to resident verbal abuse. Residents #87 and #81. The findings included: Review of the facility's Abuse Investigation and Reporting policy dated 05/24/24 documented: -All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. -The role of the investigator includes interviewing staff members (on all shifts) who have had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident. 1. Facility staff failed to conduct a thorough investigation for Resident #87's missing cellphone. Resident #87 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, for one (1) of 49 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to review the comprehensive person-centered care plan as required. (Resident #38) The findings included: Resident #38 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple medical diagnoses that included Dysphagia following Cerebral Infarction, Hemiplegia and Oropharyngeal Disease. A review of medical records for Resident #38 revealed that there were no care plans reviewed and implemented after MDS assessments were completed on the following dates: 04/01/24 (Quarterly), 07/02/24 (Annual) and 11/29/24 (Quarterly). During a face-to-face interview on 04/24/25 at approximately 2:50pm, Employee #18 (Director of Social Work) stated that the resident's care plans were not reviewed by the Inter-Disciplinary Team (IDT) after the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] and 11/29/24, the annual MDS dated [DATE]. Cross Reference 22B DCMR Section 3210.4
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, for two (2) of 49 residents sampled, facility staff failed to ensure that residents, who are unable to carry out activities of daily living, received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. Residents #87, and #86. The findings included: Review of the facility's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting policy dated 05/24/24 documented: - Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. - Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care). 1. Facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #87, who is unable to carry out activities of daily living, received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, for two (2) of 49 sampled resident's the facility's staff failed to follow: (1) Professional Standards of Practice when preparing to administer a subcutaneous injection as evidenced by Employee #16 prepared who a Heparin [anticoagulant] injection using an intramuscular (IM) gauge and length needle instead of a subcutaneous (SQ) gauge and length needle. It should be noted that the surveyor intervened before Employee #16 administered Heparin with the IM gauge and length needle. And (2) failure to follow physician's orders and care plan for turning and repositioning Resident #74 every two (2) hours. The Findings included: Resident # 75 was admitted on [DATE]. The resident had a history of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT). According to Pfizer medication information leaflet titled, Heparin Sodium Injection, Solution Hospira, Inc. with a revision date of 05/2021 documented in part, Administer Heparin Sodium Injection by intermittent intravenous injection, intravenous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to provide a resident with water flushes via Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube as prescribed for one (1) of 49 sampled residents. (Resident #38) The findings included: Resident #38 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple medical diagnoses that included Dysphagia following Cerebral Infarction and Gastrostomy Tube. A care plan with a review date of 09/13/24 documented in part, Focus - [Reside#38] requires tube feeding related to Dysphagia .Interventions -The resident is dependent with [gastrostomy] tube feeding and water flushes . A physician order dated 02/12/25 instructed, hydration water flushes 300 milliliters every four (4) hours via gastrostomy tube. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented in part that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 01, indicating that the resident cognitive status was severely impaired. The resident was also coded for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, for two (2) of 49 residents sampled, facility staff failed to ensure that the residents received care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, for their central intravenous (IV) lines. Residents' #91 and #53. The findings included: Review of the facility's Central Venous Catheter Dressing Changes dated 05/24/24 documented: - The purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-related infections - After the original insertion of CVAD (central venous access device), change transparent semi-permeable membrane (TSM) dressings at least every 5-7 days and PRN (as needed). According to the National Institute of Health (NIH): - Per Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines and nursing standards of practice, central line dressings should be changed at a minimum of every seven (7) days and as needed. - Label the dressing with the date, time, and your initials, as well as the date the dressing should be changed again. - Labeling is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for one (1) of 49 residents sampled, facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #53's attending physician evaluated his total program of care as evidenced by failing to have documented evidence that the physician reviewed the pharmacist recommendations for four (4) months. The findings included: Review of the facility's Medication Regimen Review policy dated 06/21/17 documented: - The pharmacist must report any irregularities to the attending physician, the facility's Medical Director, and Director of Nursing (DON), and these reports must be acted upon in a manner that meets the needs of the residents. - For non-urgent recommendations, the facility, and attending physician must address the recommendation(s) in a timely manner, no later than their next routine visit. Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Chronic Pain, Schizophrenia, Anxiety Disorder, and Anoxic Brain Injury. Review of the resident's medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, for two (2) of 49 residents, sampled, facility staff failed to demonstrate appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide safe nursing services. Residents #73 and #209. The findings included: Review of the facility's Change in a Resident's Condition or Status policy dated 05/24/24 documented: - The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been a(an): significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition; need to alter the resident's medical treatment significantly; need to transfer the resident to a hospital/treatment center. - Prior to notifying the physician or healthcare provider, the nurse will make detailed observations and gather relevant and pertinent information for the provider, including (for example) information prompted by the SBAR Communication Form. 1. Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Encounter for Attention…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility's staff failed to ensure a resident's medication recently received from pharmacy was available for administration for one (1) of 49 sampled residents. (Resident #75) The findings included: Resident #75 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Epilepsy, Spastic Quadriplegia, Ventilator Dependent and Gastrostomy Tube. A policy titled, Medication Ordering and Receipt with a review date of 01/03/25 instructed, The nurse .will sign the packing slip .indicating the correct medication has been delivered to the correct medication cart . A physician's order dated 03/31/25 instructed, Levetiriacetam (anti-epileptic drug) 100 milligrams/milliters solution administer 10 millitiers (1000 milligrams) via gastrostomy tube every 12 hours to prevent seizures. A pharmacy request form dated 04/11/25 revealed that the facility reordered Resident #75's Levetiracetam 100mg/ml solution on 04/11/25 and it was delivered to the facility on that same…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for one (1) of 49 residents sampled, facility staff failed to have documented evidence that the attending physician reviewed and acted upon identified irregularities noted by the pharmacist. Resident #53. The findings included: Review of the facility's Medication Regimen Review policy dated 06/21/17 documented: - The pharmacist must report any irregularities to the attending physician, the facility's Medical Director, and Director of Nursing (DON), and these reports must be acted upon in a manner that meets the needs of the residents. - For non-urgent recommendations, the facility, and attending physician must address the recommendation(s) in a timely manner, no later than their next routine visit. Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Chronic Pain, Schizophrenia, Anxiety Disorder, and Anoxic Brain Injury. Review of the resident's medical record revealed the following: Physician's orders dated 10/29/24 that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to ensure that the medication error rate was 5% or less. Subsequently, the facility had a 16% medication error rate. The findings included: During eight (8) medication administration observations conducted from 04/15/25 through 04/25/25 showed (4) errors out 25 opportunities. The medication error rate was 16%. During a face-to-face interview on 04/25/25 at approximately 3PM, Employee #2 stated that staff are provided with education on medication administration and medication management. She will ensure they receive additional education. Cross Reference F554, F684, F755, F761, and F880
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, facility staff failed to ensure safe and secure storage of residents' medications as evidenced by storing: three (3) opened and undated vials of insulin for three residents in the medication refrigerator, two, opened, expired insulin vials for two (2) residents in the medication refrigerator, and by failing to remove one Resident's insulin pen from the medication refrigerator after the Resident was discharged from the facility. Residents #9, # 64, #77, #209, and #259. The findings included: 1.On 04/23/25 at 12:03 PM, during an observation of the 5th Floor Medication Storage Room, one opened, expired vial of Humalog Mix 75/25 insulin for Resident #9 was observed in the medication room refrigerator. A handwritten date was observed in the box that the vial of insulin came in, indicating that the insulin vial had been opened on 03/20/25. Per manufacturers' ([NAME] Lilly) the guidelines for Humalog Mix 75/25 (https://uspl.lilly.com/humalog7525.html#ug),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure that food was prepared in a form designed to meet the individual needs for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents who was prescribed a mechanically altered diet. Subsequently, Resident #38 was served roast beef that was not mechanically altered to bite size as prescribed. (Resident #38) The findings included: Resident #38 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple medical diagnoses that included Dysphagia following Cerebral Infarction, Oropharyngeal Disease, Gastrostomy Tube, Gastro-Espohgeal Reflux, and Loss of Teeth. A physician's order dated 02/12/25 instructed Pleasure diet -soft and bite sized texture .upright 90-degree positioning, assist feed, small bites/sips, slow rate . Please note: This is a pleasure diet, the resident received gastrostomy tube feeding daily to meet nutritional needs, per physician order. A quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented in part that the resident had a Brief Interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, during a tour of the kitchen on April 13, 2025, at approximately 6:30 AM, facility staff failed to store and distribute food under sanitary condition as evidenced by one (1) of one (1) open bag of shredded carrots that was stored in the walk-in freezer undated, two (2) of five (5) torn air/strip curtains in one (1) of one (1) walk-in refrigerator/freezer unit, six (6) of six (6) ceiling lights above the three-compartment sink that were soiled with dust, one (1) of two (2) open eyewash solution bottle that was stored by the tray line for use, one (1) of two (2) garbage disposals that was inoperative , two (2) of two steamers with an 'out of service since May 8, 2023' sign, one (1) of two food warmers that has been inoperative since June 1, 2023. In the dry storage room, one (1) of five (5) 33.8 fluid ounces of Twocal, calorie & protein nutritional drink expired as of April 1, 2025, three (3) of 18 celling lights were missing a light bulb tube guard, and a ceiling tile that had been removed, needed to be replaced. The findings included: 1. An open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the facility's records and a staff interview, the facility failed to comply with the State Regulation (22B DCMR sect. 3211.5) for daily staffing ratios, as evidenced by not providing the minimum daily average of four and one tenth (4.1) hours of direct nursing care per resident per day, with at least six tenths (0.6) hours being provided by a registered nurse for seven (7) of 35 sampled days. The findings included: A review of the facility's daily staffing sheets revealed the following: On 10/19/24 the facility's resident census was 110. In addition, residents received 3.9 hours of direct nursing care. On 11/24/24 the facility's resident census was 105. In addition, residents received 3.8 hours of direct nursing care. On 12/21/24 the facility's resident census was 110. In addition, residents received 3.3 hours of direct nursing care with 0.50 of those hours being provided by a registered nurse. On 12/22/24 the facility's resident census was 110. In addition, residents received 3.6 hours of direct nursing care. On 12/29/24 the facility's resident census was 109.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for one (1) of 49 residents sampled, facility staff failed to have accurate documentation in Resident #209's medical record. The findings included: Resident #209 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Chronic Respiratory Failure, Anoxic Brain Injury, and Metabolic Encephalopathy. Review of the resident's medical record revealed the following: 04/21/25 at 5:59 PM Situation Background Assessment and Request (SBAR): - Situation - Tachycardia with a pulse of 135 and an oxygen saturation of 85% - Comments: In the morning the resident had a pulse of 135 and his oxygen saturation was 85%, I informed Nurse Practitioner (NP), and she said to call 9-1-1, the resident was transferred via Emergency Medical Services to [Hospital name]. A physician's order dated 04/21/25 directed, Transfer to hospital. Review of the Medication and Treatment Administration Record for April 2025 showed that on 04/21/25, night shift (7:00 PM - 7:00 AM), the nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents that were administered insulin, the facility's staff failed to follow acceptable Infection Control practices. As a result Employee #47 (RN) failed to perform hand hygiene after administering insulin. (Resident #38) Resident #38 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. A policy titled, Subcutaneous Injections with a review dated of 05/24/24 instructed on part, Put on gloves .Select appropriate injection site . slowly inject medications .with drawn needle quickly .discard equipment .remove gloves .perform hand antiseptic [hand hygiene] . A physician order dated 02/12/25 instructed, Humalog 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Lispro) Inject as per sliding scale: if 0 - 150 = 2unit; 151 - 200 = 4unit; 201 - 250 = 6unit; 251 - 300 = 8unit; 301 - 350 = 10unit; 351 - 400 = 12unit Call Md If Blood sugar is less than 60mg/dl (milligram per deciliter) or more than 400mg/dl, subcutaneously every 6 hours for Type 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations, and interview, facility staff failed to ensure that the environment remains free of pest as evidenced by three (3) of three (3) mouse traps that were observed around the cook line, one (1) of one (1)mouse trap and mouse droppings in the dishwashing machine room, and flying pest in the three-compartment sink area. The findings included: 1. Three (3) of three (3) mouse traps were observed around the cook line, behind one (1) of one (1) grill and one (1) of one (1) gas stove, and one (1) of one (1) mouse trap and mouse droppings were seen in a corner area of the dishwashing machine room. 2. Flying insects that appear to be gnats were observed in the area where the three-compartment sink is located, and sporadically throughout the kitchen. Employee #37 acknowledged the findings during a face-to-face interview on April 17, 2025, at approximately 3:00 PM.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for two (2) of 42 sampled residents, facility staff failed to implement its policy as evidenced by: 1) not having documented evidence they conducted a background check or that an employee received abuse education and 2) not removing the alleged perpetrator (facility staff) from the facility to protect the alleged victim (resident) from further abuse pending an investigation. Residents' #70 and #31. The findings included: Review of the facility policy Abuse Prevention Program revised on 12/01/22 documented: - As part of the resident abuse prevention, the administration will conduct employee background checks - Require staff training/orientation programs that include such topics as abuse preventions, identification, and reporting abuse 1. Facility staff failed to implement its policy by not having documented evidence they conducted a background check or that an employee received abuse education. Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for three (3) out of 42 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to provide written information to the resident or resident representative that stated the duration of the State Agency's bed-hold policy before the facility transferred the Resident to the hospital. Residents' #2, #310, and #34. The findings included: 1. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Metabolic Encephalopathy, Apraxia, Contracture of the Left Hand, Presence of an Artificial Eye, and Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. A review of Resident #2's medical record revealed: Resident #2's face sheet indicated that her primary Payor was Medicaid. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that the facility staff coded the Resident in the following manner: Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of, 02, indicating severely impaired cognition. An SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation/Request) Communication Form…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interview for one (1) of 42 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to develop a resident's person-centered comprehensive care plan with goals and approaches for the use of an indwelling Foley catheter. Resident #54. The findings included: Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had a history of Cerebral Palsy, Asthma, Seizure, Anemia, Atrial Fibrillation, and Sepsis. A review of a physician's order dated 11/27/23 at 1900 [7:00 PM] directed: Foley catheter care q shift every shift. A review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that facility staff coded Resident #54 had a severe cognitive impairment. The resident was dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use and the resident had an indwelling catheter. A review of Resident #54's comprehensive care plans lacked documented evidence that the facility staff developed a care plan with goals and approaches for his use of an indwelling urinary catheter.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interviews, for one (1) of 42 sampled residents, the facility's staff failed to ensure Resident #362 was provided appropriate care to prevent the resident's suprapubic catheter from becoming dislodged during care. Resident #362. The findings included: Resident #362 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Functional Quadriplegia, Neuromuscular Dysfunctional Bladder, Urogenital Implants, and Calculus Ureter. It should be noted the resident was discharged home on [DATE]. A review of a care plan dated 08/29/22 documented the following but not limited to: Focus Area - [Resident's name] has an indwelling suprapubic catheter (Neurogenic bladder). Goal - [Resident's name] will be free from catheter-related trauma through review date. Interventions -Catheter: [Resident's name] has 24fr indwelling suprapubic Catheter. Position catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder and away from entrance room door. -Check tubing for kinks each shift.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interview, for one (1) of 42 sampled residents, Employee #5 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN), failed to ensure that Resident #46 received effective pain management in accordance with the physician's orders and the comprehensive care plan. The findings included: Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Chronic Pain Syndrome, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Retention of Urine. A physician's order dated 11/02/23 that directed, Acetaminophen (pain reliever) Tablet 325 MG (milligrams), give 2 tablets by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain, do not exceed 3-4gm (grams) in 24 hours. A care plan focus area: [Resident #46] has acute pain r/t (related to) medical procedure abdominal surgical site. Date Initiated: 11/02/2023. Interventions included: - Administer analgesia medication as per orders - Give 1/2 (half) hour before treatments or care - Anticipate the resident's need for pain relief and respond immediately to any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on one (1) of five (5) observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to demonstrate competency to provide appropriate nursing services to assure resident safety. The findings included: According to the National Library of Medicine- National Center for Biotechnology Information, - If multiple medications must be administered enterally, they should be administered separately, ideally after flushing the feeding tube with 5-10 mL of water, due to the unpredictable stability and compatibility of crushed drug mixtures and the potential for serious drug-drug interactions - Guidance documents from CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) state that the crushed medications should not be combined and given all at once via feeding tube https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511598/ According to the Long-Term Care Nursing: Medication Pass, - Do not, under any circumstances, try to pre-pour medications to save time - Pre-pouring medications are against regulations - In addition, it increases the risk of making mistakes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on one (1) of five (5) observations, record review and staff interviews, facility staff failed to ensure that the system to account for the reconciliation of controlled medications was followed. The findings included: During an observation on 01/11/24 at 8:44 AM of Medication Cart B on the 5th Floor with Employee #7 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) the following was noted on the January 2024 Controlled Medication Shift Change Log: - 01/01/24 - 7:00 AM count correct- left blank; signature off-going nurse- left blank; signature on-coming nurse- left blank - 01/01/24 - 7:00 PM count correct- left blank; signature off-going nurse- left blank; - 01/02/24 - 7:00 AM count correct- left blank; signature off-going nurse- left blank; - 01/06/24 - 7:00 AM - 7:00 PM count correct- left blank - No entry for 01/06/24 7:00 PM - 7:00 AM - 01/07/24 - 7:00 AM - 7:00 PM count correct- left blank - 01/07/24 - 7:00 PM - 7:00 AM count correct- left blank - 01/08/24 - 7:00 AM - 7:00 PM count correct- left blank; signature on-coming nurse- left blank - 01/08/24 - 7:00 PM - 7:00 AM count correct- left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to serve cold food (pineapples and pears) at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit for two (2) of 2 opportunities. The findings included: On 01/11/24 at 1:19 PM, a test tray on the 4th floor revealed a cup of pineapples that had a temperature of 51 degrees Fahrenheit. During a face-to-face interview on 01/11/24 at 1:20 PM, Employee #18 (Chef) acknowledged the findings. On 01/12/24 at 12:59PM, a test tray on the 4th floor revealed a cup of pears that had a temperature of 53 degrees Fahrenheit. During a face-to-face interview on 01/12/24 at 1:00 PM, Employee #18 acknowledged the findings. During a face-to-face interview on 01/12/24 at 1:30 PM, Employee #19 (Food Service Director) stated that moving forward they will order cooling bowls with lids to serve cold food.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 42 sampled residents, facility staff failed to operate and provide services in compliance with applicable State regulations regarding professionals providing services in the facility. Resident #70. The findings included: According to 22B DCMR sec. 3203.7, Each administrative record shall be retained for at least five (5) years from the date of creation. Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Quadriplegia, Spinal Stenosis and Muscle Weakness. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed facility staff coded a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 15, indicating intact cognition. A Facility Reported Incident (FRI), DC~11412, submitted to the State Agency on 12/27/22 documented: [Resident #70] reported to the nursing supervisor that the assigned RN (Registered Nurse) screamed at him because he refused to be turned. During an onsite investigation and review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, for one of eleven (11) sampled residents, facility staff failed to report the results of its investigation for an incident involving resident-to-resident verbal abuse to the State agency within five (5) working days of the incident. Residents #3 and #5. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy entitled Abuse Investigation and Reportingdocumented: The Administrator or his/her designee will provide the appropriate agencies or individual .with a written report of the findings of the investigation within five (5) working days of the occurrence of the incident. 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Metabolic Encephalopathy, Chronic Respiratory Failure, Hemiplegia, Muscle Weakness, Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed the following: A physician's order dated 08/18/22 directed: Quetiapine Fumarate 25 mg. Give 0.5 mg tablet by mouth every 12 hours for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff and resident interviews for (1) of eleven sampled residents, facility staff failed to update Resident #3's care plan interventions after the Resident had another verbal altercation with a second resident (Resident #5). The findings included: 1.Resident #7 and Resident #3 had a verbal altercation on 04/09/23. A. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Cerebral Palsy, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Respiratory Failure, Tracheostomy, Gastrostomy, Psychotic Disorder, Depression, Anxiety, and Bipolar Disorder. Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed the following: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed that facility staff coded the Resident as having a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Summary Score of, 8, indicating the Resident had moderately impaired cognition. In addition, facility staff coded the Resident as rejecting care and having verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others (e.g.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews of (1) of eleven sampled residents, facility staff sat at the nurse's station and failed to respond to a resident's room while the ventilator alarmed continuously to alert staff of a ventilator emergency when the HME (heat moisture exchange) tubing had dislodged from the resident's tracheostomy collar for longer than one minute. (Resident #8). The findings included: Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Chronic Respiratory Failure, Tracheostomy, Ventilator Dependent, Dementia, Anxiety, Cerebral Vascular Accident with Left Hemiparesis, Sigmoid Volvulus, Bowel Resection, Gastrostomy, Congestive Heart Failure and Morbid Obesity. A Physician order dated 02/11/21 documented, Trach (tracheostomy) care and suctioning q (every) shift and PRN (as needed) by Nursing/RT (Respiratory Therapist). A Care Plan focus area dated 09/07/21 documented, [Resident's name] has an ADL self-care performance, incontinence deficit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interview, for four (4) of nine (9) sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide the residents, or their representatives, with written information that specified the duration of the state bed-hold policy before transfer to the hospital. Residents' #2, #3, #5 and #9. The findings included: Review of the facility's Bed-Holds and Return Policy documented that prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy. 1. Resident #2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Respiratory Failure and Dependence on Respirator (Ventilator). Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the following: A face sheet that documented the resident's spouse as their responsible party. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed facility staff coded: a Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of nine (9) sampled residents, facility staff failed to immediately (within 2 hours) report an allegation of employee-to-resident physical abuse to the State Agency. Resident #7. The findings included: Review of the facility policy Abuse Investigation and Reporting documented: -All reports of resident abuse shall be promptly reported to local and state agencies. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Encephalopathy, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Chronic Pain Syndrome. Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed the following: An Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] showed facility staff coded: clear speech, understands others and able to make self understood; a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 15, indicating intact cognition; no indicators of psychosis, rejection of care or behavioral symptoms. A physician's order dated 02/09/23 directed, CBC (complete blood count); Basic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of nine (9) sampled residents, facility staff failed to have documented evidence that an allegation of employee abuse was thoroughly investigated at the time when staff first had knowledge of the allegation. Resident #7. The findings included: Review of the policy Abuse Investigation and Reporting documented: -All reports of resident abuse shall be promptly and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Encephalopathy, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Chronic Pain Syndrome. Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed the following: An Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] showed facility staff coded: clear speech, understands others and able to make self understood; a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 15, indicating intact cognition; no indicators of psychosis, rejection of care or behavioral symptoms. A physician's order dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) on nine (9) sampled residents, facility staff failed to accurately code Resident #5's resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a deep tissue injury on the sacrum. The findings included: Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Severe Protein- Calorie Malnutrition and Long Term use of Anticoagulants. A Skin and Wound Evaluation dated 11/03/22 at 7:51 AM documented that a pressure, deep tissue injury (DTI) on the sacrum was present on admission that measured 5.7 cm (centimeters) in length by 9.7 cm wide. An admission MDS assessment date 11/09/22 showed that in Section M (Skin Conditions), facility staff failed to code Resident #5's deep tissue injury as evidenced by the area that asked current number of deep tissue injury being left blank. A FRI, DC~11535, received by the State Agency on 01/20/23 documented that an allegation of neglect was received on 01/18/23 from Resident #5's daughter.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of nine (9) sampled residents, facility staff failed to revise one (1) resident's care plan to include use of an arm sling for immobilization for a right shoulder fracture. Resident #3. The findings included: Review of the facility policy Care Planning/Meeting - Interdisciplinary Team documented that the facility's Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the development of an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis and Contracture of Muscle, Left Upper Arm. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed the following: A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed facility staff coded: totally dependent with two persons physical assist for bed mobility, transfer and had functional impairment in range of motion on both sides for upper and lower extremities. A Situation Background Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of nine (9) sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary care and services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene. Resident #6. The findings included: Review of the facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting documented that residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene (bathing, dressing grooming and oral care). Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Urinary Incontinence, Cognitive Communication Disorder, and Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed the following: A care plan focus area [Resident #6] has an ADL self-care performance deficit that was initiated on 03/07/22 had interventions that included: provide sponge bath when a full bath or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, for one (1) of nine sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure one (1) resident received appropriate care and services to prevent potential complications (contamination and infection) of enteral feedings. Resident #3. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy Enteral Feedings - Safety Precautions documented: -The facility will remain current and follow accepted best practices enteral nutrition -On the formula label document initials, date and time formula was hung. According to the National Institute of Health (NIH): -Hanging time is another factor on which safety of enteral feeding depends on -Closed containers are discarded after 24 hours due to current manufacturer recommendations -Besides the feed, even the feeding delivery sets can be a source of contamination. Hence, they also need to be replaced every 24 hours. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7519612/ Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-03-25 · tag F0888 — widespreadEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, facility staff failed to updated their COVID-19 policies and procedures to include contingency plans for staff who are not fully vaccinated. The resident census on the first day of survey was 110. The findings include: Review of the facility's line listing of staff who were vaccinated showed that six (6) staff had not received the vaccine and applied for an exemption with the State Agency. It was further noted that two (2) of the staff members worked in non-resident areas; and four (4) of the staff members performed direct resident care. During the face-to-face meeting with Employee #29 (Infection Control Preventionist) on 03/23/22 at approximately 4:45 PM, an Infection Control interview and review of the facility's infection control policies and procedures was done. It was noted that the policy did not address a contingency plan for staff who are not fully vaccinated due to a pending request for an exemption or that have been granted exemptions. Employee #29 stated that all of the employees had filed to be exempt with the State Agency and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement its Abuse Investigation and Reporting policy by not investigating the following incidents: (1) a resident who had an unwitnessed fall with injury resulting in the resident being transferred to the hospital for evaluation; (2) a resident who sustained a minor injury after a portable fan fell on the resident; (3) a resident who had a witnessed fall with a minor injury; (4) a resident who had an unwitnessed fall without injury; (5) a resident whose gastrostomy tube was dislodged; and (6) a residents whose midlines were dislodged. Residents' #30, #32, #79, #263, #105 and #207. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect- Clinical Protocol, dated 11/01/21, defined neglect as the failure of the facility, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-25 · tag F0620 — patternNot require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for one (1) of 53 sampled residents, facility staff failed to have an admissions policy in place; and failed to ensure residents and or their responsible party reviewed and signed an admission contract, informing them of the facility's approach to finances, residents' rights, care, treatment and services, and advance directives. Resident #95. The findings include: Facilty staff failed to ensure Resident #95 and or their responsible party reviewed and signed an admission contract. Resident #95 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia or Hypercapnia, Cerebral Palsy, Pressure Ulcer Stage 4, Tracheostomy and Gastrostomy Review of the Resident's contract on 03/17/2022 dated showed that it was not dated and signed by the resident's responsible party. There is no evidence that Resident #95 or his responsible party was made aware of or provided notice regarding: Statement of Services and Charges, the Representatives' Rights…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, for six (6) of 53 sampled residents, the facility's staff failed to develop a care plan with goals and approaches to address: the use of a portable fan; monitoring a resident for signs and symptoms of Depression; and restorative nursing for a residents; Dementia care for a resident; the use of antibotics for a resident and to implement the interventions for a resident at risk for falls. (Residents' #32, #96, #79, #2, #262, and #263) The findings include: 1.The facility's staff failed to develop a care plan to address Resident #32's use of a portable fan. Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses, including Respiratory Failure, Systemic Lupus, Ventilator Dependent, and Generalized Muscle Weakness. Review of a facility reported incident (FRI) received by the DC Department of Health on 06/28/21 documented that on 06/27/21 at 8;30 AM, the resident (Resident #32) sustained a small skin tear to the upper right braw [brow]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, for four (4) of 53 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan as evidenced by failure to: (1) provide activities of daily living (ADL) in a manner that prevented a Resident #29's midline (intravenous line) from being dislodged; (2) administer Vancomycin (antibiotic) liquid to Resident #55 by the incorrect route; (3) administer Midodrine (increases blood pressure) to Resident #81 in accordance with the physician's order; and (4) obtain orders to treat Resident #92's noted rash on the perineum and legs. The findings include: 1. Facility staff failed to provide activities of daily living in a manner that prevented Resident #29's midline from being dislodged. Resident #29 was admitted to facility on 12/27/21. The resident had a history of Multiple Sclerosis, Quadriplegia, and Sepsis. On 03/21/22 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, for two (2) of 53 sampled residents, the facility's staff failed to maintain Standards of Infection Control Practices when providing tracheostomy care for Resident #103 and when suctioning Resident #81. The findings include: 1.The facility's staff failed to maintain Infection Control Standards when providing tracheostomy care for Resident #103. Resident #103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Tracheostomy, Respiratory Failure, and Dependence on Respiratory Ventilator. On 03/15/22 at 10:11 AM, Employee #11 (Respiratory Therapist) was observed setting up a sterile field with equipment to provide trach care for Resident #103. After setting up the sterile field, Employee #11 performed hand hygiene and put on sterile gloves. The employee was noted contaminating her sterile gloves when she touched a pack of 4X4s lying on an uncleaned bedside table. The employee then touched the resident's inner cannula tracheostomy tube with her uncleaned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for three (3) of 53 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that there was documentation in the resident's medical record of the information/education provided regarding the benefits and risks of immunization, the administration or the refusal of or medical contraindications to the vaccine(s). Residents' #6, #262 and #263. The findings include: 1. Resident #6 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Respiratory Failure, Anemia and Hypertension. Review of the Resident #6's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed the resident was coded as not receiving the Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccinations and the stated reason was - offered and declined. Review of Resident #6's medical record (electronic and paper) lacked documented evidence that facility staff provided information/education to the resident or their representative regarding the benefits and risks of the influenza and pneumococcal immunization or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-25 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, facility staff failed to ensure that one (1) staff member was in compliance with receiving the COVID-19 vaccination series. The resident census on the first day of survey was 110. The findings include: According to the Centers for Disease (CDC) The number of doses needed depends on which vaccine you receive. To get the most protection: Two (2) Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine doses should be given 3 weeks (21 days) apart, two (2) Moderna vaccine doses should be given 1 month (28 days) apart and Johnson & Johnsons [NAME] COVID-19 vaccine requires only one dose. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/faq.html#:~:text=The%20number%20of%20doses%20needed,than%20the%20recommended%20interval. According to the District of Columbia Department of Health (DC DOH), All licensees in the District of Columbia are required to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19. Licensees must have the single dose [NAME] COVID-19 vaccine, or at least one dose of either the Pfizer or Moderna…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility's staff failed to provide Advance Directive information to incapacitated resident or their representatives; and to offer a resident or their representative the opportunity to formulate an Advance Directive for three (3) of 53 sampled residents (Residents' #30, #96 and #26). The findings include: 1. Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses, including Respiratory Failure, Brain Stem Stroke Syndrome, and Atrial Fibrillation. Review of a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that the Resident was coded for having memory problems with short-term and long-term memory and severely impaired cognitive skills for decision making. Review of the Resident #30's face sheet shows the resident had a representative (daughter). Review of the resident's medical record showed the resident was a Full Code. However, the record lacked documented evidence the Resident #30's representative was provided information about Advance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff and resident's representative interview, the facility's staff failed to notify a resident's representative of a resident's change in status (self-decannulation), which resulted in the resident being transferred to the emergency room for re-insertion of a tracheostomy tube for one (1) of 53 sampled residents (Resident #102). The finding included: Review of a complaint received by the DC Department of Health on 02/28/21 documented, He [the complainant] received a call at 3:35 AM from [hospital's name] because his sister .trach [tracheostomy tube] came out or she pulled it out .he never received a call from the facility indicating his sister was being transferred. Resident #102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses, including Chronic Respiratory Failure, Tracheostomy, and Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy. On 03/17/22 at approximately 9:30 AM, Resident #102 was observed lying in bed with a tracheostomy tube and trach collar at 28% FiO2[fraction of inspired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-25 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for one (1) of 53 sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide documented evidence that a baseline care plan was provided to a resident or his representative within 48 hours of readmission into the facility. Resident #63 The findings include: Resident #63 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Respiratory Failure, Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA), Encounter For Attention To Gastrostomy, Encephalopathy and Urinary Tract Infection. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], facility staff documented that Resident #63 had a Brief Interview Mental Status Summary Score (BIMS) of 00 indicating the resident, had severe cognitive impairment. In addition, facility staff documented the resident: was totally dependent, for bed mobility, transfers dressing, and eating; was always incontinent for bowel and bladder and had an indwelling urinary catheter, and the resident has a nasogastric or abdominal feeding tube percutaneous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for one (1) of 53 sampled residents, facility staff failed to accurately record the location and status of a wound Resident #261's. The findings include: Resident #261 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Epilepsy, Hypertension, Retention of Urine, Malignant Neoplasm of Prostate and Chronic Vascular Disorders of Intestine. Review of the clinical record showed the following: 08/25/21 [Situation Background Assessment Request (SBAR) Situation - Open Blister on the left buttocks (no measurements recorded) . Resident alert and responsive, during morning care the open blister was noted on his left buttock .Order given to clean with wound cleanser pat dry and apply xeroform daily. 08/26/21 [Skin and Wound Evaluation] Location: Sacrum; Describe: Pressure, Unstageable: Obscured full-thickness and tissue loss, slough and/or eschar; In house- acquired on 0825/2021; wound measurements: 4.1 cm (centimeter) x 4.0 cm x 0.2 cm; Granulation 6.50% would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, for two (2) of 53 sampled residents, the facility's staff failed to (1)provide supervison during activities of daily living (ADL) care which resulted in Resident #29's midline (intravenous line) being dislodged and (2) ensure that a space heater was not used to heat Resident #1's room. The findings included: 1. Facility staff failed to provide activities of daily living in a manner that prevented Resident #29's midline from being dislodged. Resident #29 was admitted to facility on 12/27/21. The resident had a history of Multiple Sclerosis, Quadriplegia, and Sepsis. On 03/21/22 at approximately 2:15 PM, an observation showed Resident #29 lying in bed with a double lumen midline in the right upper extremity. The mid-line's transparent dressing was dry and intact. Further observation showed the midline insertion site had no drainage, redness, or swelling. The resident was wearing a hospital gown with snaps. And the resident's bilateral upper extremities were contracted. Review of Resident #29's medical record showed the following: 03/02/22 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for two (2) of 53 sampled residents, facility's staff failed to address an unusual weight for a resident; and failed to ensure that a resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight. Residents' #30 and #63. The findings included: Review of the Nutritional Assessment policy dated 11/02/21documented that the dietitian, in conjunction with the nursing staff and healthcare practitioners, will conduct a nutritional assessment for each resident .as indicated by a change in conditions that places the resident at risk for impaired nutrition .The assessment will be conducted by the multidisciplinary team and shall at least include the following components .nursing[will assess]unusual weight .dietitian[will determine] whether the resident's current intake is adequate to meet his or her nutritional needs. Review of the Weight Assessment and Intervention policy dated 11/09/21 documented that the nursing staff will measure residents'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-25 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for three (3) of 53 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure the residents with Midlines (A catheter that is inserted in a peripheral vein and ends near the upper arm use for intravenous therapy) were assess for complications at the insertion site during the therapy and post removal or dislodgement of the catheter. (Residents' #55, #93, and #63.) The findings include: 1.Failed to assess Resident #55's Midline insertion site post removal or dislodgement; and failed to document the discontinue of the residents Midline. Resident #55 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury with Loss of Consciousness, Dysphagia, Anxiety Disorder, Anoxic Brain Damage, Hypertension, Clostridium Difficile (C-Diff), and Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). Review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed Resident #55 was coded as follows: Section C (Cognitive Pattern) his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) the resident is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews for (1) one of 53 sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide respiratory care that is consistent with professional standards of practice for one resident who was receiving humidified oxygen. Resident #34. The findings include: Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, Chronic Respiratory Failure , Unspecified, Dysphagia, Shortness of Breath, and Dependence on Supplemental Oxygen. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], facility staff documented that Resident #34 had a Brief Interview Mental Status Summary Score (BIMS) of 10 indicating the resident, had mild cognitive impairment. In addition, facility staff documented: the resident: was totally dependent and required assistance from one person for all ADL(assisted daily living) care, and was always incontinent for bladder. Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed: 10/02/21 (Physician's Order): Change Nasal Cannula Tubing/Mask and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-25 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for one (1) out of 53 sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide treatment, services, and develop a plan of care for Resident #2's diagnosis of dementia. Resident #2 The findings include: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses that included: Unspecified Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Major Depressive Disorder, and Psychotic Disorder with Hallucinations due to Known Physiological Condition. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed that the facility staff coded the following: In section C (Cognitive Patterns): Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Summary Score 10 indicating moderately impaired cognition. In section I (Active Diagnoses): Neurological, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia Review of the medical record revealed that there was no documented evidence of a dementia care plan with goals that were achievable and interventions that were person-centered to address care needs of the resident. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, facility staff failed to ensure one (1) expired vial of influenza vaccine and one (1) vial of tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative, PPD injection, were discarded and not stored for use in two (2) of three (3) medication refrigerators observed. The findings include: According to the manufactures speciation's for the Influenza Vaccine stipulated, 16.2 Storage and Handling .Once the stopper of the mulit-dose vial has been pierced the vial must be discarded within 28 days. https://www.fda.gov/media/117022/download According to the manufactures speciation's for the Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative, stipulated, Storage .A vial of Tubersol [Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative] which has been entered and in use for 30 days should be discarded. https://www.fda.gov/media/74866/download 1.On [DATE] at 3:18 PM an observation of the 4th floor medication storage room refrigerator was conducted. Observed stored was a vial of Afluria 2021-2022 Quadrivalent (Influenza…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-25 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviw for two (2) of 53 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure Resident #78 received the appropriate treatment when he/she complained of pain during urination; and failed to obtain labs in accordance with the physician's order for Resident #81. The findings include: 1. Facility staff failed to ensure Resident #78 received the appropriate treatment when he/she complained of pain during urination. Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Neuralgia and Neuritis, Muscle weakness, anxiety disorder, and Lymphedema Review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed the following: Section C (Cognitive Patterns), facility staff coded Resident #78 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 13, indicating intact cognitive response. Section G (Functional Status), Resident #78 was coded for needing extensive supervision with two person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use, personal hygiene. Section H…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-03-25 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, facility staff failed to ensure that survey results were placed in a readily accessible location where residents and visitors wishing to examine them could do so without having to ask staff to see them. The census on the first day of survey was 110. The findings include: During a tour of the main lobby on 03/22/22 at approximately 3:20 PM, the past survey results were not visibly available to residents and visitors for review. When asked the security guard sitting behind the front desk reached under the desk and produced a binder with the past survey results. Facility staff failed to ensure that survey results were visibly accessible to residents and visitors. During a face-to-face interview Employee #2 acknowledged the finding at the time of the observation.
- No harm found · Bcited before2022-03-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, facility staff failed to store foods under sanitary conditions as evidenced by two (2 of six (6) slats in the main freezer that were torn throughout. The findings include: During a walkthrough of dietary services on March 17, 2022, at approximately 10:00 AM, two (2) of six (6) slats from the walk-in freezer were torn with missing pieces. Employee #16 acknowledged the findings during a face-to-face interview on March 17, 2022, at approximately 10:30 AM.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$112,756 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $17,638 — penalty dated 2026-05-06
- $95,118 — penalty dated 2025-05-05
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRIDGEPOINT HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 10/01/2014 |
| FERRELL, MARC | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/03/2014 |
| BEITPOULICE, SWENDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/20/2015 |
| ELEBIARY, AHMED | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/09/2025 |
| OYEKOYA, OLAYINKA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/11/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in DC
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the District of Columbia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner. The starred figure is the national median (no state figure published).
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 095027. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.