Deanwood Rehabilitation And Wellness Center
5000 Nannie Helen Burroughs Ave. NE, Washington, DC 20019 · For profit - Corporation · 296 certified beds · (202) 399-7504 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2022
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (111) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $97,607 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-04)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 4 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.8% | 20.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.8% | 5.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 23.1% | 6.4% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.4% | 1.1% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.6% | 16.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 3.4% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 97.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 11.5% | 7.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.7% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.9% | 8.0% | 17.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.2% | 0.8% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 58.2% | 73.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.4% | 18.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.4% | 8.6% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.49 | 1.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.95 | 0.55 | 1.80 | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
31.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 140 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 49.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 123 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 47% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 31.9%CMS range 24.3–40.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 9.0–14.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 49.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 40.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 93.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.4%CMS range 5.1–10.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.10 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 296 beds and averages 266.7 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.19 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 4 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
111 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 95 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, for one (1) of eight (8) sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #4 was provided with adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents. During this survey, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ-J) was identified at 42 CFR 483.25, Quality of Care, F689, Free of Accident Hazards/Supervisions/Devices on January 30, 2026 at 6:14 PM. The facility's Administrator submitted a corrective action plan to the Survey Team that was accepted on January 30, 2026 at 8:21 PM. The Survey Team verified implementation of the corrective plan while onsite and the Immediate Jeopardy was lifted on February 2, 2026 at 4:30 PM. After removal of the immediacy, the deficient practice was lowered to a scope and severity level of D.The findings included:Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Hypertension.A care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, resident and staff interviews, for three (3) of 94 sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision for residents as evidenced by: 1. Resident #120, who uses a wheelchair for locomotion and requires medications to treat multiple diagnoses, eloped from the facility on 04/29/24; 2. Resident #64 having an unwitnessed fall from her wheelchair; and 3. Resident #79 having multiple falls with injury. The facility's census on 04/29/24 was 265. Due to this failure, an Immediate Jeopardy was identified on May 2, 2024, at 11:30 AM related to the elopement of Resident #120. The facility's Administrator submitted a corrective action plan to the Survey Team that was accepted on May 3, 2024, at 12:18 AM. The Survey Team verified implementation of the corrective plan while onsite and the Immediate Jeopardy was lifted on May 8, 2024, at 4:36 PM. After removal of the immediacy, the deficient practice remained at actual harm and the scope and severity of a G. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for one (1) of 94 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #463 received timely treatment and care after an unwitnessed fall with documented pain and swelling in her left arm. Subsequently, 23 hours lapsed before an order for x-ray was obtained that determined that the resident sustained a fracture to her left arm; and she was sent to the hospital 2 days later. These failures resulted in actual harm to Resident #463 who had unresolved pain for a minimum of 23 hours post fall. The findings included: Resident #463 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: End Stage Renal Disease, Anemia and Hyperlipidemia. Review of the resident's medical record a physician's order dated 10/30/23 that directed, Assess resident for pain every shift on a scale from 0 to 10; Dialysis Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday; bed to the lowest position when resident is in bed every shift; call light and all commonly use articles within resident reach…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, for seven (7) of 105 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure residents were free from abuse (willful infliction of injury) and neglect as evidenced by: failure to prevent the willful infliction of serious injury of Resident #404 by Resident #82; failure to implement person center care measures for Resident #151 who had incidences of aggressive behavior towards Resident #71 and willful infliction of injury to Resident #67; failure to ensure staff received training to provide person-centered care to Resident #409 post hip replacement, subsequently the resident sustained a dislocated hip; failure to ensure Resident #3's airway (stoma) was not occluded by a medical device Heat Moisture Exchanger (HME) subsequently, the resident to be transferred to the emergency room (ER) for dislodgment; and failure to have available [NAME]-tube and HME (medical equipment) for treatment and care of Resident #3's stoma subsequently, the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident, family and staff interviews, for 11 of 105 sampled residents, the facility's staff failed to ensure that residents received adequate supervision as evidenced by failure to 1. ensure that Resident #404 received adequate supervision to prevent an altercation with Resident #82, resulting in serious injury, 2. provide adequate supervision for Resident #56 who sustained a fall outside in front of the facility resulting in serious injury, 3. provide Resident #409 who was status post hip surgery with adequate supervision to prevent an injury of unknown origin (dislocated hip), 4. provide adequate supervision of Resident #151 to prevent altercations with Residents #71 and #67, 5. properly secure Resident #183's wheelchair during a van transport, resulting in a fall with injury, 6. provide adequate supervision of Resident #61 to prevent multiple falls with an injury, and 7. provide adequate supervision and monitoring of Resident #72 to prevent an altercation with Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff and family interviews, for two (2) of two (2) sampled residents with laryngectomies, the facility's staff failed to: 1. ensure Resident #3's airway (stoma) was not occluded by a medical device Heat Moisture Exchanger (HME) subsequently, the resident to be transferred to the emergency room (ER) for dislodgment, 2. keep a supply of respiratory medical equipment in the facility that was necessary to care for and treat Resident #3's laryngectomy and stoma, resulting in the resident being transferred to the ER for a replacement 3. obtain/provide Resident #3 with HMEs, 4. change and clean respiratory equipment in accordance with the physician's orders for Resident #304, and 4. obtain an order for the use of a button (HME) for Resident #304 with a Tracheostomy. These failures resulted in actual harm for Resident #3, example #1. The findings include: 1. The facility's staff failed to ensure Resident #3's airway (stoma) was not occluded by a medical device HME subsequently,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, facility staff failed to implement infection prevention and control practices to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections as evidenced by: failure to perform hand hygiene and don required personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to entering Resident #8's room who was on contact precautions; one (1) of five (5) hand sanitizer stations on unit 2 south were not operable; and failure to have an operable hand soap dispenser and hand soap in one staff restroom.The findings included:Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: End Stage Renal Disease and Diastolic Congestive Heart Failure. Review of the resident's medical record revealed the following: A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed that facility staff coded a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment.01/27/26 at 2:00 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews and staff interviews, for two (2) of eight (8) sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment were accurately coded for rejection of care behaviors and one wandering behaviors. Residents' #6 and #1.The findings included: Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA), Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Muscle Disease. Review of the resident's medical record revealed the following: 12/24/25 at 11:44 AM Nurses Note: Resident alert, oriented and verbally responsive. resident refused lab, MD (medical doctor) and RP (representative) notified. Lab rescheduled. A care plan focus area revised on 12/24/25: [Resident #6] is noncompliant with treatment/care, had interventions that included, if resists care, leave and return later and provide education to patient/family. An admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] showed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, for one (1) of eight (8) sampled residents, facility staff failed to implement Resident #4's care plan intervention of having an escort when using the stairwell. The findings included:Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Hypertension. Review of the resident's medical record revealed the following: A care plan focus area revised on 10/29/25: [Resident #4] to use the stairs when going down and when coming back in, with an escort. A physician's order dated 12/11/25 directed, Oxygen Supplementation. Administer Oxygen 2-3L/min via Nasal Cannula, every shift for COPD.A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed that facility staff coded: a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 15, indicating intact cognitive response; shortness of breath or trouble breathing with exertion, when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, for one (1) of eight (8) sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that a resident who needed continuous oxygen was provided with such care. Resident #4.The findings included: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Hypertension. Review of the resident's medical record revealed the following: A care plan focus area last revised on 10/29/25, [Resident #4] is on oxygen therapy r/t (related to) COPD, had interventions that included: for residents who should be ambulatory, provide extension tubing or portable oxygen apparatus and oxygen settings: [Resident #4] has O2 (oxygen) via nasal prongs @ (2-3 )L/M (liters per minute) continuously. A physician's order dated 12/11/25 directed, Oxygen Supplementation. Administer Oxygen 2-3 L/min via Nasal Cannula, every shift for COPD.A Quarterly Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, for one (1) out of three (3) dining observations, facility staff failed to distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.The findings included: Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) S483.60(i) Food Safety Requirements documents in part:Hand Washing, Gloves, and Antimicrobial Gel - Employees should never use bare hand contact with any foods, ready to eat or otherwise. Since the skin carries microorganisms, it is critical that staff involved in food preparation, distribution and serving consistently utilize good hygienic practices and techniques. Staff should have access to proper hand-washing facilities with available soap (regular or anti-microbial), hot water, and disposable towels and/or heat/air drying methods.Staff must decontaminate hands by proper hand washing (preferred) or use of hand sanitizers (when hand washing sinks are not available) when outside the kitchen in the following situations: Prior to starting meal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and staff interview, facility staff failed to meet the State requirement of providing a minimum daily average of four and one tenth (4.1) hours of direct nursing care per resident per day on 01/30/26, when an Immediate Jeopardy was identified. The census on that day was 273.The findings included: Review of the facility's staffing revealed that they failed to meet the requirement of providing a minimum daily average of four and one tenth (4.1) hours of direct nursing care per resident per day on 01/30/26. The total direct nursing hours per resident on 01/30/26 was 3.9, the same day an Immediate Jeopardy was identified. During a face-to-face interview on 02/04/26 at 2:53 PM, the findings were brought to the attention of Employee #8 (Staffing Coordinator). The employee acknowledged the findings and stated, I hear that '4.1' number a lot and we are working hard on meeting that requirement.Cross Reference 22B DCMR Sec. 3211.5
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, resident and staff interviews, for three (3) of eight (8) sampled residents, facility staff inaccurately documented that Residents' #5 and #6 received showers when they did not; and facility staff failed to accurately complete Resident #4's Safe Smoker Assessment.The findings included:Review of the facility's Clinical Documentation/Record policy dated January 2026 documented in part:Documentation entries into organization documents or the health record (including but not limited to provider orders) must be accurate, valid, complete, and authenticated, that is, the information is truthful.Review of the 2 south shower, bath and skin sweep sheets document provided to the surveyor on 01/29/26 showed that on Mondays and Thursdays, day shift, the residents in room [ROOM NUMBER] (private) and 229D were scheduled to get a shower.Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Cirrhosis of the Liver, Muscle Weakness, Sickle- Cell Disease and Heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, facility staff failed to provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable environment as evidenced by dust buildup in 25 of 25 residents' rooms, soiled window tracks and frames in one (1) of eight (8) dayrooms, dirty floors in 13 of 53 residents' rooms, sticky floors in nine (9) of 53 residents' rooms, a foul smell on one (1) of eight (8) resident care unit, dirty toilets in two (2) of 53 residents' rooms, dirty trash cans in three (3) of 53 residents' rooms, stained privacy curtains in three (3) of 53 residents' rooms, and dusty window blinds in five (5) of 53 residents' rooms.The findings include:During an environmental walkthrough of the facility on September 17, 2025, between10:30 AM, and 2:00 PM, the following issues were identified: 1. Dust buildup was observed under the handwashing sinks, under the beds, in wall corners, around the nightstands and dressers, and chairs in 25 of 25 resident's rooms on the fourth and fifth floor. 2. Window…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, facility staff failed to maintain an efficient pest control system as evidenced by flies that were seen in three (3) of 13 resident's rooms on the third floor.The findings include:1. Numerous flies were observed in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on unit 3 North. Further investigation revealed a trash can that was soiled at the bottom with a dark substance that seemed to attract the flies. The trash can was placed in a large trash bag, disposed of, and replaced. 2. Flies were evident in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. Further investigation revealed a dark, lumpy substance that was on the floor, under a portable toilet that was around the foot of the bed on the B side of the double occupancy room. The substance was eventually identified as human waste by staff and the room was immediately cleaned and the floor disinfected. 3. Two (2) flies were observed on the privacy curtain in room [ROOM NUMBER], side A of the double occupancy room, and two (2) other flies were seen on a pillow, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #1 had the correct Trazadone (antidepressant medication) dose available for administration and failed to ensure that the resident received the correct dose of 50 MG (milligrams) for five (5) days.The findings included:A facility policy titled Administering Medications dated 01/2025 documented:- Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber's orders.- The individual administering the medication checks the label to verify the right medication, right dose, right time and right method (route).Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Major Depressive Disorder, Adjustment Disorder, Unspecified Dementia, and Metabolic Encephalopathy.Review of the resident's medical record showed the following: A physician's order dated 08/04/25 that directed, Trazodone HCl (Hydrochloride) oral tablet 50 MG (milligrams), give 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 95 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents, facility nursing staff failed to ensure that one resident received care and services according to accepted standards of clinical nursing practice as evidenced by no documented evidence that the physician was notified prior to a licensed registered nurse altering a resident's medication order label. Resident #1.The findings included:According to the National Institute of Health (NIH)- The standard of practice for registered nurses (RNs) is that they do not have the authority to prescribe medication independently.- Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs), specifically nurse practitioners (NPs), do, with their authority determined by state Nurse Practice Acts. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK574557/A facility policy titled Administering Medications dated 01/2025 documented:- Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber's orders.- If a dosage is believed to be inappropriate or excessive for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, for one (1) of six sampled residents, facility staff inaccurately documented that they administered Trazadone (antidepressant medication) 50 MG (milligrams), one tablet to Resident #1.The findings included: A facility policy titled Administering Medications dated 01/2025 documented:- Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber's orders.- The individual administering the medication checks the label to verify the right medication, right dose, right time and right method (route).Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Major Depressive Disorder, Adjustment Disorder, Unspecified Dementia, and Metabolic Encephalopathy.Review of the resident's medical record showed the following: An admission Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed that facility staff coded: a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 02 indicating severely impaired cognitive function; total mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff and resident interviews, the facility staff failed to provide respect to a resident when the resident spoke about a concern with her television for one (1) of 10 sampled residents (Resident # 2). The findings included: Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Hemiplegia, Cervical Disk Disorder and Morbid Obesity. A quarterly Minimum Date Set assessment dated [DATE] documented that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status summary score of 10 indicating that the resident's cognitive status was moderately impaired. During an observation with Employee #2 (DON) and Employee #4 (Assigned RN) on 01/24/25 at approximately 10 AM, Resident #2 was noted in her room lying in bed, well groomed, alert, oriented to person, place, time, and situation. At the time of the observation, the resident stated that she prefers to stay in bed and watch tv, but her tv had not worked for approximately a week. As the resident was speaking, Employee #4 interrupted and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the required comfortable air temperature range of 71°F to 81°F for one for one (1) of 10 sampled residents. (Resident #2) The findings included: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Hemiplegia, Cervical Disk Disorder and Morbid Obesity. A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status summary score of 10 indicating that the resident's cognitive status was moderately impaired. During an observation on 1/23/2025 at 10:45am, the resident was observed lying in bed alert, oriented to name, place and time. At the time of observation, the resident was lying in bed with a heavy blanket covering her, stating that her room has been cold for the past week. The resident further stated that her room gets colder at night. The resident added that she informed the nursing staff her room was cold, but she couldn't recall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their Advanced Directive (5 Wishes) policy for one (1) of three (3) sample residents. (Resident #1) The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including pneumonia and acute respiratory failure. A physician order dated [DATE] instructed, No, CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) palliative and supportive care. A review a policy tilted, End of Life Planning Policy-Five Wishes dated 01/2023 documented in part, The policy applies to all residents upon admission and throughout their stay, with assessments and updates conducted by the social worker and the Interdisciplinary Team The social worker will complete the Advanced Life Care Planning Assessment with 48 to 72 hours of admission .The Interdisciplinary Care Planning Team will review M.O.S.T [and] Advanced Directives [5 wishes] with the resident during quarterly care planning session to determine if the resident wishes to make changes in such…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-11 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have documented evidence that the resident or the resident representative was provided with a written copy of the base line care plan. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including pneumonia and acute respiratory failure. A review of the resident's Base Line Care Plan dated 10/14/23 documented in part, Initial Baseline Care Plan meeting held today for [Resident #1] 10/14/2023 in the resident's room with all the team members present. Resident responsible party] joined via telephone conference. The care plan lacked documented evidence, a written copy was provided to the resident or resident's party responsible. A review of the progress notes dated from 10/14/23 to 10/31/23 lacked documented evidence that a written copy of the Base Line Care Plan was provided to the resident or the resident's representative. An admission Minimum Date Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident had a brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, residents and staff interviews, facility staff failed to make information on how to file grievances available to the residents. The census on the first day of the survey was 265. The findings included: Review of the facility's Resident Grievance/Concerns policies and procedures dated January 2024 documented: - The facility must make information on how to file a grievance or complaint available to the resident. During observations on 04/19/24, 04/22/24 and on 04/23/24 on the second, third, fourth and fifth floors, the following was noted: - Each floor had a black lock box, with a small opening labeled Grievance Box; there was a compartment behind the box that was noted to be empty. During a Resident Council Meeting on 04/24/24 at 2:00 PM, multiple residents stated that grievance forms were not readily available to them and were not sure of where to find them. During a face-to-face interview on 04/25/24 at 12:00 PM with the Social Services Department, the surveyor asked them where the grievance forms are kept/located. Employee #14 (Social Worker) stated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, for four (4) of 94 sampled residents, facility staff failed to maintain accurate medical records. (Residents' #365, #417, #464, and #467). The findings included: A review of the facility's Clinical Documentation/Record' policy dated [DATE], documented, Clinical documentation is required to record pertinent facts, findings, and observations about resident's health history including past and present illnesses, examinations, tests, treatments, and outcomes. 1. Resident #365 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, End-Stage Renal Disease, and Hemodialysis. A review of Resident #365's medial record revealed the following: A Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] that revealed that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was 15, indicating that the resident had intact cognition. The resident was also coded for had taking insulin and being on dialysis. A physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, for one (1) of 94 sampled residents, facility staff failed to treat Resident #68 with dignity and respect. The findings included: Review of the resident Admissions Packet provided to the survey team on 04/19/24 documented: - Your rights and protections as a nursing home resident: You have the right to be treated with respect and dignity. Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Huntington's Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Lack of Coordination and Fall. Review of the resident's medical record revealed the following: A physician's order dated 09/14/23 directed, Admit to skilled level of care. The resident requires SNF (skilled nursing facility) covered care on a daily basis. A physician's order dated 09/15/23 directed, Provide incontinent care every shift. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed that facility staff coded: clear speech, usually understood others and usually makes self…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for one (1) of 94 sampled residents, the physician failed to follow the resident's/resident representatives (RP) Advanced Directives wishes. Resident #109. The findings included: Resident #109 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included Cerebral Infarct, Hemiplegia Affecting Right Dominant Side, and Aphasia. Review of the resident's medical record revealed the following: A face sheet that documented [Resident #109's daughter's name] as the representative (RP). An Advanced Life Care Planning Five Elements/Wishes Form signed on [DATE] by the resident's RP and facility staff that documented: - The person I want to make care decisions for me when I cannot, [Daughter's name]. - The kind of treatment I want, Full Code. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed facility staff coded the following: a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 00, indicating severely impaired cognitive status. A physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 94 sampled residents, facility staff failed to have documented evidence that they provided Resident #216 or their representative with Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC). The findings included: Resident #216 was re-admitted to the facility with Medicare Part A services on 01/10/24 with multiple diagnoses that included: Morbid Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation. Review of the resident's medical record showed the following: A face sheet that showed the resident had a guardian that waws also her Resident Representative (RP), care conference person and emergency contact #1. A physician's order dated 01/10/24 directed, Admit to skilled level of care. The resident requires SNF (skilled nursing facility) covered care on a daily basis. A Quarterly/Medicare - 5 Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed that facility staff documented: - Medicare Part A services started on 01/10/24 and had a Brief Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, facility staff failed to provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a safe, clean, orderly environment as evidenced by two (2) of two (2) storage rooms that were filled with miscellaneous items that were scattered throughout. The findings include: During an environmental walkthrough of the facility on May 1, 2024, at approximately 2:00 pm, one (1) of one (1) storage room on unit 2 South, and one (1) of one (1) storage room on unit 4 South, were filled with clothing items that were stored on the floor, in multiple storage bins. These observations were acknowledged by Employee #11 during a face-to-face interview on May 2, 2024, at approximately 4:00 pm.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, for two (2) of 94 sampled residents, facility staff failed to report Resident #120's incident of elopement to the State Agency in a timely manner (within 2 hours); and failed to have documented evidence that they reported an unusual incident in which Resident #127 had a psychiatric emergency and broke her bedroom window to the State Agency. The findings included: 1. Facility staff failed to report Resident #120's incident of elopement to the State Agency in a timely manner (within 2 hours). Resident #120 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Schizoaffective Disorder, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation, Seizure Disorder, and Gait Abnormality. Review of the resident's medical record revealed the following: A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed facility staff coded: Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 09, indicating moderately impaired cognition; used a wheelchair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews and staff interviews, for three (3) of 94 sampled residents, facility staff failed to: follow their corrective actions of ensuring a resident's safety after Resident #313's allegation of abuse by a male caregiver; follow their corrective actions of ensuring Resident #43's safety from further potential abuse and retaliation by staff after an allegation of abuse; and have documented evidence that Resident #466's injury of unknown origin was thoroughly investigated. Residents' #313, #43 and #466. The findings included: Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating policy with a review date of 01/2024 documented: - All reports of resident abuse, including injuries of unknown origin, are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. - Cause identification: Appropriate steps…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, for four (4) of 94 sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide documented evidence that the resident or resident's representative was provided with written notification that specified the duration of the state bed hold policy to include notification of when the resident is permitted to return to the facility and resume residence in the nursing home. Resident's #3, #79, #414, and #419. The findings included: Review of the facility policy entitled, Transfer or Discharge, Emergency Care dated 03/2022 documented: - The Social Worker/Designee during hospital transfer will ensure that the resident and responsible party is notified verbally or by telephone or in writing of how many bed hold days the resident has. 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Urinary Tract Infection, Severe Sepsis without Septic Shock, and Chronic Diastolic Congestive Heart Failure. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed the following: A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 94 sampled residents, facility staff failed to accurately code Resident #79's falls history on the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. The findings included: Resident #79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: History of Falling, Personal History of Transient Ischemic Attack, and Dementia. Review of Resident #79's medical record revealed the following: A Nursing Progress Note dated 03/31/24 at 10:05 AM, documented: - At 8:45 AM, resident was observed by staff sitting on the floor at bedside with laceration on left side of head measured 5.0 cm (centimeters)x (times) 0.5cm(centimeters) x (times) 0.1cm (centimeters) slight bleeding, no hematoma. A Facility Reported Incident (FRI), DC~12611, was submitted to the State Agency on 03/31/24 documented, [Resident #79] was observed by staff sitting on the floor at bedside with laceration on left side of head, slight bleeding, no hematoma. RP (resident representative)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, resident, and staff interviews, for two (2) of 94 sampled residents, facility staff failed to implement care plan interventions as indicated in the resident's comprehensive care plan. Residents' #79 and #189. The findings included: Review of the facility's Care Plan Meeting policy, dated January 2024, documented: - The care plan must be customized to each individual patient's preferences and needs. - Comprehensive, person-centered care plans are based on resident assessments and developed by an interdisciplinary team (IDT). 1. Resident #79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: History of Falling, Personal History of Transient Ischemic Attack and Cerebral Infarction Without Residual Deficits, and Dementia. Review of Resident #79's medical record revealed the following: A Nursing Progress Note dated 03/31/24 at 10:05 AM, documented: - At 8:45 AM, the resident was observed by staff sitting on the floor at bedside with laceration on left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident, and staff interviews, for one (1) of 94 sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide Resident #189 with the necessary restorative nursing treatment, care, and services to maintain or improve ability to carry out the activities of daily living (mobility and ambulation) based on the comprehensive assessment of the resident and consistent with the resident's care plan. The findings included: Review of the facility's Restorative Nursing Care policy, dated January 2024, documented: - Residents will receive restorative nursing care as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence. - Restorative goals and objectives are individualized and resident-centered and are outlined in the resident's plan of care. Resident #189 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Muscle Weakness, End Stage Renal Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Fluid Overload, and Hyperlipidemia. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed that facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, for two (2) of 94 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living, received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. Residents' #68 and #107. The findings included: 1. Facility staff failed to ensure Resident #68 received personal hygiene care in a timely manner. Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Huntington's Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Lack of Coordination and Fall. Review of the resident's medical record revealed the following: A physician's order dated 09/14/23 directed, Admit to skilled level of care. The resident requires SNF (skilled nursing facility) covered care on a daily basis. A physician's order dated 09/15/23 directed, Provide incontinent care every shift. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed that facility staff coded: clear speech, usually understood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for one (1) of 94 sampled residents, facility staff failed to have documented evidence of any skin changes on Resident #466's sacrum prior a deep tissue injury being found that measured 5 centimeters (cm) by 5 cm. The findings included: Review of the facility's Wounds and Skin Assessments policy dated January 2024, documented: - Upon readmission, the resident's skin will be evaluated head-to-toe by a licensed nurse and documentation will be maintained in the resident's Electronic Medical Record (EMR). - Daily, during routine care and showers, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) will observe the resident's skin. When abnormalities are noted, this will be communicated to the licensed nurse and the licensed nurse will proceed to complete an assessment and appropriate documentation. - The wound team, wound physician/NP (Nurse Practitioner) or wound nurse, captures the measurements and evaluation of existing wounds for the resident. - Residents that are admitted or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, for two (2) of 94 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to provide pain management services that were consistent with professional standards and in accordance with the resident's care plan. Residents' #463 and #68. The findings included: Review of the facility's Pain Assessment and Management policy revised in January 2024 documented: - Pain management is defined as the process of alleviating the resident's pain based on his or her clinical condition and established treatment goals. - Review the resident's clinical record to identify conditions or situations that may predispose the resident to pain. - Review the resident's treatment record or recent nurses' notes to identify any situations or interventions where an increase in the resident's pain may be anticipated. - Implement the medication regimen as ordered, carefully documenting the results of the interventions. - Document the resident's reported level of pain with adequate detail (i.e.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, for one (1) of 94 sampled residents, the nurse practitioner failed to timely address a resident's known subtherapeutic Valporic Acid (anitconvulsant medication) level. Resident #120. The findings included: According to the National Institute of Health (NIH), Valproic Acid (VPA) is a medication used to treat neurological and psychiatric disorders. The therapeutic uses of VPA include epilepsy treatment across different seizure types, bipolar disorder management, and migraine. The therapeutic range for total valproate in epilepsy is 50 to 100 mcg (micrograms)/ml (milliliters), and in mania, it is 50 to 125 mcg/ml . https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559112/#:~:text=Valproic%20acid%20(VPA)%20ia%20as,disorder%20management%2C%20and%20migraine%20prophylaxis. Resident #120 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Seizure Disorder. A physician's order dated 09/12/23 directed, Diazepam Rectal Gel 10 MG (Diazepam Anticonvulsant), insert 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff Interview of one (1) of 94 sampled resident, the physician staff failed to review Resident #177's total program of care to include documented reports of critical lab values. The findings included: According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA), the following is ranges a guide for normal blood glucose levels: - Fasting: 80 -180 mg (milligrams)/dL (deciliters). - Pre-prandial (before meals): 100 -180 mg/dL. - Postprandial (one to two hours after eating): Less than 180 mg/dL. - Bedtime: 110-200 mg/dL. - If you experience high blood sugar levels or low blood glucose levels compared to this range you should speak to your doctor. https://diabeticme.org/learning-center/health-guides/what-are-normal-blood-sugar-levels/ Resident #177 was admitted to facility on 05/14/22 with diagnoses of Pituitary Gland Disorder, Anemia, Hypertension, Cerebral Infarction, and Viral Hepatitis. Review of the resident's medical record revealed the following: An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations record reviews and staff interviews for, two (2) of 94 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to have nursing staff with the appropriate skill sets to care for residents needs as identified in the residents plan of care as evidenced by a Licensed Practical Nurse documenting Resident #417's blood glucose reading as 1 in the medical record on multiple dates, and a Licensed Practical Nurse who was observed administering pain medication for Resident #68 without doing a pain assessment and after Resident #68 complained of pain and for also failing to reposition Resident #68 who asked repeatedly to be repositioned for comfort. Residents' #417 and #68. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure that nursing staff with the appropriate skill sets to care for residents needs as identified in the resident's plan of care as evidenced by a Licensed Practical Nurse documenting a residents Blood glucose reading as 1 in the medical record on multiple dates for Resident #417.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews for three (3) of 94 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to ensure that the residents' medications were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. As evidenced by multiple loose and unwrapped pills noted in two (2) residents' sections in the medication cart. Also, noted was a resident's expired Acetaminophen-Codeine 300-30 mg tablets in a locked narcotic box which contained other residents' current medications. The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage revised on 01/2024 documented the following: The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure and orderly manner. Drugs and biologicals are stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received. Only the issuing pharmacy is authorized to transfer medications between containers. The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for one (1) of 94 sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide services in compliance with all applicable Federal and State regulations in the facility as evidenced by failing to conduct quarterly care plan meetings for Resident #107. The findings included: Review of the facility's Care Plan Meeting policy, dated January 2024 documented, It is the policy of the facility to arrange for an interdisciplinary team care plan meeting on a quarterly basis/on a significant change and as needed. Documentation for the care plan meeting is maintained in the Electronic Medical Record. Resident #107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Cerebrovascular Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Dysphagia. A face sheet that listed the resident's sister as emergency contact number #1. An IDT Care Plan Meeting summary dated 09/28/23 documented, Quarterly IDT meeting was held today. The Responsible Party was notified by mail and by phone to no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-04-20 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, the facility failed to maintain and implement an effective, comprehensive quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) program inclusive of all systems as evidenced by failing to ensure that they developed plans of action to identify quality deficiencies. The resident census during the survey was 255. The findings include: Facility staff failed to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies as follows: Under §483.12, F600 Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Under §483.25(d)(2), F689 adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents Under § 483.25(i), F695 Respiratory care Under §483.25(k) F697 Pain Management During a face-to-face interview was conducted with Employee #2 and Employee #5 on 04/20/22 at approximately 12:00 PM, at the time of the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) interview. They were asked if the facility identified resident-to-resident abuse and altercations, resident behaviors, residents wandering, activities of daily living (ADL) care,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, facility staff failed to: (1) ensure Resident #132's urine collection bag was not resting on the floor and (2) maintain infection control and prevention practices to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The census on the first day of survey was 255. The findings include: 1. Facility staff failed to provide ensure Resident #132's urine collection bag was not resting on the floor. According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines for prevention of catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) includes: . Keep the collecting bag below the level of the bladder at all times. Do not rest the bag on the floor. (https://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/CAUTI/CAUTIguideline2009final.pdf) On 04/07/22 at approximately 3: 45 PM, Resident #132 was observed resident lying in bed with his urine collection bag resting lying on the floor. Resident #132 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable environment as evidenced by damaged privacy curtains in six (6) of 76 resident's rooms, soiled bathroom vents in five (5) of 76 resident's rooms, a foul, offensive odor in (5) of 76 resident's rooms and malfunctioning packaged terminal air conditioner (PTAC) units in three (3) of 76 resident rooms. The findings include: During an environmental walkthrough of the facility on 03/30/22, at approximately 4:00 PM, and on 04/04/22, between 10:00 AM and 3:45 PM, the following was observed: 1. Privacy curtains were torn and separated from the rails in six (6) of 76 resident's rooms including rooms #211, #308, #309, #310, #311, and #329. 2. Bathroom vents were soiled with dust in five (5) of 76 resident's rooms specifically rooms #401, #405, #428, #420, and #529. 3. A strong urine odor was evident in resident room [ROOM NUMBER], #428, #502, #516, and #524, five (5) of 76…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for eight (8) of 105 sampled residents, facility staff failed to implement its policies and procedures for investigating allegations of abuse, neglect and injuries of unknown source. Residents' #11, #50, #67, #71, #151, #221, #408 and #409. The findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Prohibition of Abuse (not dated), documented, . Reports on abuse are reviewed and investigation conducted by the director of nursing . within 24 hours following the incident .If suspected abuse/inappropriate behavior are between two residents, residents will be immediately separated from each other and monitored until appropriate interventions are implemented .All employees will sign a memo attesting, their understanding and compliance to abuse standards . Review of the facility's policy also showed that neglect was defined as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for six (6) of 105 sampled residents, facility staff failed to: (1) conduct investigations for unusual occurrences for Residents' #3 and #409; (2) conduct investigations of resident-to-resident altercations with Residents' #67, #71 and #151; and (3) conduct a thorough investigation of Resident #221's threat of violence against his roommate. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Prohibition of Abuse with a revision date of 02/2022, showed neglect was defined as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. The policy revealed that staff are to complete an incident/accident form for any unusual occurrences and submit it to the Director of Nursing or designee .A final report of the investigation will be reported and signed by the Administrator .If suspected abuse/inappropriate behavior are between two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-20 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for six (6) of 105 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to: (1) notify Resident #3's, #132's and #406's representative(s) in writing the reason for the resident's transfer to a hospital and (2) provide written notification to Resident #82's, #233's and #404's representatives of room relocation. The findings include: 1.Facility staff failed to: (1) notify Resident #3's, #132's and #406's representative(s) in writing the reason for the resident's transfer to a hospital. 1A. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Malignant Neoplasm of Larynx, Carcinoma of Larynx, Acquired Absence of Larynx, and Tracheostomy Status. Review of the Resident #3's medical record showed a physician's order dated 12/03/21 that instructed, Transfer resident to the nearest ER (emergency room) for further evaluation related to stuck humified moisture exchange (HME) in stoma. 12/03/21 at 2:42 PM [Nursing Progress Note] The respiratory therapist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-20 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for five (5) of 105 sampled residents, facility staff failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS). Residents' #50, #155, #160, #183 and #502. The findings include: 1. Facility staff failed to code Resident #50's MDS to reflect the need of 2 person's physical assist. Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Morbid Obesity, Anxiety Disorder, Mood Affective Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed the following: 01/30/20 (Revision date) [Care Plan] [Resident #50] has an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) limited ROM (range of motion), limited mobility, morbid obesity . the resident requires 2 staff participation to reposition and turn in bed, the resident requires total assistance with personal hygiene care . 11/16/20 (Creation Date) [Care Plan] Alleged abuse . 2 CNAs (Certified Nurse Aides) to provide ADL care all shift .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for eight (8) of 105 sampled residents, facility staff failed to develop and/or comprehensive care plans with measurable goals, timeframes and approaches to address resident care concerns (Stoma Site Care, 2 CNAs for ADL care, assistance with dentures, indwelling urinary catheter, speech deficit, new diagnosis of chest pain, behavior of urinating on the bathroom floor, refusal of care and complaints of chest pain. Residents' #3, #50, #204, #126, #132, #155, #180 and #403. The findings include: Review the facility's policy entitled, Interdisciplinary Team Meeting (Care Plan Meeting) revised 03/2022 documented, . It is the policy of [Facility Name] to develop and implement person-centered care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care that meet professional standards of quality care . 1. Facility staff failed to include interventions to care of Resident #3's stoma site. Resident #3 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for 11 of 105 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to update the comprehensive care plan with goals and approaches that address one (1) resident's visit to the dentist for actual tooth extractions, one (1) resident with a right upper arm fistula access site post-dialysis care, three (3) residents with a PermaCath; and three (3) resident exhibiting behaviors and failed to update one (1) residents care plan to address their need to have two (2) person physical assist. Residents' #27, #61, #82, #95, #126, #151,#71, #67, #182, #404 and #502. The findings included: Review the facility policy entitled, Interdisciplinary Team Meeting (Care Plan Meeting) revised 03/2022 documented, . A comprehensive, individualized care plan will . be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team . Review the facility policy entitled, Resident-To-Resident Altercation/Incidents revised 01/2022 documented, . When a resident is observed or identified as being aggressive to having…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-20 · tag F0660 — patternPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for six (6) of 105 sampled residents, facility staff failed to: (1) have a discharge plan for one resident; (2) record/document information related to the resident's discharge plan to the community in the clinical record;(3) ensure the residents discharge needs were adequately identified and the results developed into a discharge plan. Residents' #155, #170, #227, #237, #406 and #412. The findings include: 1. Facility staff failed to update Resident #155's discharge plan and avoid unnecessary delays in the discharge process. Resident #155 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including, Dysphagia, Oropharyngeal Phase, Unspecified Lack of Coordination, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Unspecified Cerebrovascular Disease Affecting Left Dominant Side. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], showed that facility staff coded the following: In section C (Cognitive Patterns) BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Summary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, family interview and staff interview, for four (4) of 105 sampled residents, the facility's staff failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance to the physicians' order and the comprehensive person-centered care plan as evidenced by: failed to provide stoma site for one (1) resident; failed to schedule one (1) resident for an audiology consult appointment; failed to implement the care plan intervention of having two (2) certified nurse aides (CNAs) for activities of daily living (ADLs) for one (1) resident; and failed to administer nebulizer inhaler as ordered the physician's order for one (1) resident. (Residents' #3, #50, #82 and #181). The findings include: 1. The facility's staff failed to follow standards of practice by not providing stoma care for Resident #3 from 12/01/21 to 02/06/22. Review of an intake form for a complaint received by the DC Department of Health, Health Care Regulation and Licensing Administration on 01/26/22 showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview for five (5) of 105 sampled residents, facility staff failed to: (1) ensure the dialysis communication form (used to reflect ongoing collaboration between the facility and dialysis staff contained pertinent information that reflected the resident care) was completed and included in the medical record as part of the record and (2) have an emergency kit (pressure bandage) at bedside of a resident who had an arteriovenous graft dialysis access site. Residents' #61, #95, #181, #182 and #502. The findings include: 1. Facility staff failed to ensure the dialysis communication form used to reflect ongoing collaboration between the facility staff and dialysis staff was included as part of Resident #61's medical record. Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Viral Hepatitis C, Anemia, Hypertension, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Acute Kidney failure,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, facility staff failed to ensure that the system used for the reconciliation of controlled medications was followed; and failed to accurately reconcile controlled medications for three (3) of 16 records reviewed. The findings include: The facility's policy and procedures for the storage of controlled substances revised on 08/2020 stated: Policy: Medications classified by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as controlled substances are subject to special handling, storage, disposal, and recordkeeping in the facility in accordance with federal, state, and other applicable laws and regulations .Procedures: .Unless otherwise indicated .the following will be performed . At each shift change, or when keys are transferred, a physical inventory of all controlled substances, including refrigerated items, is conducted by two licensed personnel and is documented . Controlled substance inventory is regularly reconciled to the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and documented on a Control Count Sheet (or similar form) or in accordance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for six (6) of 105 sampled residents, facility staff failed to: (1) show documented evidence that the attending physician or designee reviewed the monthly medication regimen review and that they acted upon the pharmacists' recommendations. Residents' #16, #22, #61, #167, #190, #238 The findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Medication Regimen Review, dated 08/2020 documented, . Recommendations are acted upon and documented by the facility staff and/or prescriber. The prescriber accepts and acts upon recommendation or rejects provides an explanation for disagreeing . The Director of Nursing or designated licensed nurse address and document recommendations that do not require a physician intervention, e.g., monitor blood pressure . 1. Facility staff failed to act upon the pharmacist recommendation to Please eval Risperdal for a GDR (gradual dose reduction) . for Resident #16. Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, facility staff failed to serve and distribute foods in accordance with professional standards of practice for food services safety as evidenced by hot food temperatures that tested at less than 135° Fahrenheit (F) during a food tray assessment on April 12, 2022. The findings include: Hot foods temperatures were inconsistent during a test tray assessment on April 12, 2022. Hot foods from the regular diet, such as fried fish ([NAME]), green beans, and rice, tested under 135° Fahrenheit (F), while mechanical and pureed foods were above required temperature. Fried Fish (regular diet) = 132° F White [NAME] (regular diet) = 132° F Green Beans (regular diet)) = 129° F Mixed Vegetables (mechanical) = 138° F Fried Fish (mechanical) = 147° F White rice (mechanical) = 142° F Fried Fish (puree) = 150° F Mixed Vegetables (puree) = 148° F Mashed Potatoes = 150° F These findings were acknowledged by Employee #15, during a face-to-face interview on April 12, 2022, at 3:45 PM.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-20 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, Administration failed to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident as evidenced by failure to ensure that: staff implemented measures to prevent resident-to-resident abuse and altercations for six (6) residents; adequate supervision was provided to one (1) resident who sustain a dislocated hip of unknown origin; to adequately supervise one (1) resident who sustained a fall with injury; ensure the appropriate respiratory medical supplies were on hand for care and treatment, and to ensure staff were trained on how to care for two (2) residents with a laryngectomies. The census on the first day of survey was 255. The findings include: 1. In the area of 42 CFR§ 483.12, Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, Administration failed to ensure residents were free from abuse (willful infliction of injury) and neglect as evidenced by: failure to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-20 · tag F0837 — patternEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, Governing body failed to ensure that established and implemented policies regarding the management and operation of the facility were followed and action plans were developed and implemented to: prevent resident-to-resident abuse and altercations for six (6) residents; ensure adequate supervision was provided to one (1) resident who sustain a dislocated hip of unknown origin; adequately supervise one (1) resident who sustained a fall with injury; ensure the appropriate respiratory medical supplies were on hand for care and treatment; ensure staff were trained on how to care for two (2) residents with a laryngectomies; and to ensure the administrative staff maintained the integrity of an Incident/Accident Report (investigative report) for one (1) resident. The census on the first day of survey was 255. The findings include: 1. In the area of 42 CFR§ 483.12, Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, Administration failed to ensure residents were free…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for five (5) of 105 sampled residents, the facility's staff failed to ensure a resident's record contained accurate information as evidenced by failure to: accurately record information on a Treatment administration record for one (1) resident; maintain the integrity of an Incident/Accident Report related to a resident-to-resident altercation resulting in serious injury to the resident; and ensure resident's medical record were accurately documented for three (3) residents. Residents' #3, #126, #164, #404, and #408. The findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Clinical Documentation/Record dated 03/2022 revealed, It is the policy of [Facility Name] to ensure accurate documentation of important elements contributing tote high quality care of our residents . Clinical documentation is required to record pertinent facts, findings and observations about resident's health . 1. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #3's Treatment Administration Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-20 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for two (2) of 105 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that there was documentation in the resident's medical record of the information/education provided regarding the benefits and risks of immunization, the administration or the refusal of or medical contraindications to the vaccine(s). Residents' #182 and #603. The findings include: Review of the policy entitled, Pneumococcal Policy and Procedure (not dated) documented, It is the policy of [facility Name] to offer to all residents pneumococcal upon admission and administer in accordance with the recommendations of the Centers of Disease Control (CDC) and the facility Medical Director . 1. Resident #182 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Hypertension, Heart Failure, Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease. According the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], facility staff coded Resident #182 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, for one (1) of 105 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #64 was treated with respect and dignity evidenced by failure to provide an environment that enhances the resident's quality of life, was based on his individuality and medical condition. The findings include: Resident #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Acquired Absence of Unspecified Leg below Knee, Pathological Fracture, Unspecified Femur, Initial Encounter for Fracture, Muscle Weakness (Generalized), Spinal Stenosis, Site Unspecified. According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], the resident was coded as 15 under Section C0500 BIMS Score indicating that he is cognitively intact. Under Section G0110 Functional Status, the resident was coded as 3, indicating he required extensive assistance for toilet use, with one-person physical assist. Under Section G0110 Functional Status, the resident was coded as 3, indicating he required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and resident and staff interview, for one (1) of 105 sampled residents, the facility's staff failed to provide Resident #113 access to the bathroom and an elevated toilet seat causing the resident to be dependent on staff to use the bathroom. The findings include: During an observation on 03/29/22 at approximately 11:30AM, Resident #113's bathroom was locked, and the surveyor had to access the bathroom from the neighbor's side. It was also observed that the bathroom did not have an elevated toilet seat. Resident #113 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident has a history of General Muscle Weakness, Generalized Arthritis, Difficulty Walking, and Osteoporosis. Review of a Quarterly Minimum Date Set dated 02/09/22 showed Resident #113 had a BIMs summary score of 15, indicating the resident had intact cognition. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #113 was coded for needing supervision and requiring the physical assistance of one person for toilet use, not moving on and off…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews for one (1) out of 105 sampled residents, facility staff failed to offer a resident who had been moved due to a COVID-19 outbreak, the opportunity to move back to her previous room or previous unit once COVID-19 precautions were lifted. Resident #233. The findings include: Resident #233 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy, Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 4, and Cerebral Infarction Due to Unspecified Occlusion or a Stenosis of Unspecified Cerebellar Artery. Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] facility staff coded Resident #233 in the following manner: Section C (Cognitive Patterns) Brief Interview for Mental Status Summary Score was 15, indicating that the resident was cognitively intact. A review of Resident #233's medical record revealed: 01/01/22 at 9:53 AM [Activities Note -In-house Transfer]: [Resident #233's Name] was relocated from room [ROOM NUMBER]B to room [ROOM NUMBER]A as a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for two (2) of 105 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that two (2) residents or their representative was provided the NOMNC form no later than noon of the day before the effective date indicated/date listed as discontinuance of skilled services. Residents' #209 and #553. The findings include: The Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage form stipulates that every Medicare resident in a facility has the right to appeal the decision of non-coverage to the Quality Improvement Organization .The Quality Improvement Organization will notify you of its decision as soon as possible, generally no later than two days after the effective date of the notice if you are in Original Medicare . 1. Resident #209 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Anemia, Hypertension, and Vertebral Sacral Fracture. According to the NOMNC form, Resident #209's last day of coverage for Skilled Nursing Services was March 21,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for three (3) of 105 sampled residents, facility staff failed to: (1) report the unusual occurrences for Resident #3 and Resident #409 and (2) report the results of the investigation for Resident #408's injury of unknown origin. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Prohibition of Abuse with a revision date of 02/22, showed neglect was defined as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. The policy revealed that staff are to, complete an incident/accident form for any unusual occurrences and submit it to the Director of Nursing or designee .A final report of the investigation will be reported and signed by the Administrator. 1. Facility staff failed to report Resident #3's heat and moisture exchanger (HME) being stuck in his stoma (unusual occurrence) and Resident #409's dislocated hip (unusual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for three (3) of 105 sampled residents, the facility's staff failed to ensure: (1) Resident #3's discharge, transfer, or relocation form dated 12/03/21 included accurate information and (2) Resident #126's and #155's care plan goals were sent to the receiving hospital. The findings include: 1. The facility's staff failed to ensure Resident #3's discharge, transfer, or relocation form dated 12/03/21 included the accurate information. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Malignant Neoplasm of Larynx, Carcinoma of Larynx, Acquired Absence of Larynx, and Tracheostomy Status. Review of the Resident #3's medical record showed a physician's order dated 12/03/21 that instructed, transfer resident to the nearest ER (emergency room) for further evaluation related to stuck HME in stoma. 12/03/21 at 2:42 PM [Nursing Progress Note] The respiratory therapist notified writer that resident has an HME stuck in the stoma (airway). Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for two (2) of 105 sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide Resident #132 and Resident #151 or their representative(s) with written information that specified the bed-hold policy. The findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Transfer or Discharge, Emergency Care dated 03/2022 documented, .The Social Worker/Designee during hospital transfer .will ensure that the resident and responsible party is notified verbally or by telephone or in writing of how many bed hold days the resident has . 1. Resident #132 was readmitted on [DATE] from a [Local hospital] with diagnoses that included: Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), Alzheimer's, Dementia, Epilepsy and Muscle Weakness (Generalized). A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #132 dated 02/17/22 revealed that facility staff coded the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Summary Score was 99, indicating that the resident had severely impaired cognition. A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-20 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for 2 (two) of 105 sampled residents, the facility's staff failed to ensure that Resident #181's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] and Resident #188's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] were completed 14 days after the assessment reference date. The findings include: 1. Resident #181 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Asthma, Heart Failure, and End Stage Renal Disease. Review of the resident's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed Resident #181 had an assessment reference date of 03/01/22, which made the MDS required completion date 03/15/22. Sections G (Functional Status), GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) and Z (Assessment Administration) showed that Employee #19 (Regional MDS Coordinator) completed these sections on 03/22/22. Additionally, Section Z0500, RN Assessment Coordinator's Signature and Date to verify completion was left blank. 2. Resident #188 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family interview, and staff interview, for one (1) of 105 sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide Resident #3's representative with a summary of the baseline care plan. The findings include: Facility staff failed to provide Resident #3's representative with a summary of the baseline care plan. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Malignant Neoplasm of Larynx, Carcinoma of Larynx, Acquired Absence of Larynx, and Tracheostomy Status. Review of the Resident #3's medical record lacked documented evidence that the summary of the base-line care plan was provided to Resident #3's representative(s). During a telephone interview on 04/12/22 starting at 11:35 AM, the resident's granddaughter stated that neither she nor her mother (responsible party) ever received a copy of the baseline a care plan or attended a care plan meeting for Resident #3. During a face-to-face interview on 04/13/22 at 11:47 AM, Employee #11 (4th Floor Social Worker)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, for two (2) of 105 sampled residents, facility staff failed to: 1) assist a resident with applying her dentures before meals; and 2) failed to ensure one (1) resident was seen by audiology to address his ability to hear when communicating with others. Residents' #204 and #82. The findings include: 1. Facility staff failed to assist Resident #204 with applying her dentures before meals. During an observation on 03/30/22 at approximately 1:30 PM, Resident #204 the resident was observed with her lunch tray. When asked if she liked the food at the facility, the resident reported that the food in the facility was okay, but she wanted to wear her dentures when she eats. The writer asked if her dentures were with her in the facility and she stated, Yes. Resident #204 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA), Human Immuno-Deficiency Virus (HIV), Diabetes Mellitus, and Cognitive Communication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, for one (1) of 105 sampled residents, the facility's staff failed to provide Resident #113 showers. The findings include: During an observation on 03/29/22 at approximately 11:30 AM, Resident #113 was in bed and a certified nurse aide (CNA) had just finished providing am care. The resident was asked, how often does she receive showers, Resident #113 said, I don't get showers. I just wash myself up in my bed. Resident #113 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident has a history of General Muscle Weakness, Generalized Arthritis, Difficulty Walking, and Osteoporosis. Review of a Quarterly Minimum Date Set dated 02/09/22 showed the following: In section C (Cognitive Pattern) - the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status Summary Score of 15, indicating the resident had intact cognition. In section G (Functional Status) - Resident #113 was coded as needing supervision and set-up assistance with bathing, not steady and only able to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-20 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, for one (1) of 105 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #82 received assistive devices to maintain hearing ability. The findings include: During a face-to-face interview conducted on 03/29/22 at approximately 10:00 AM, Resident #82 stated, I can't hear. You have to come closer. No hearing assistive devices were observed in the resident ' s ear or in his room. Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]with multiple diagnoses that included: Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Schizophrenia. Review of Resident #82's medical record revealed: A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] that showed facility staff coded a Brief Minimum Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score, 14, indicating intact cognitive response. 09/21/21 [Physician's Orders] Referral for Audiology consult 2/2 (secondary to) to pt (patient) reports of bilateral hearing loss impacting communication and quality of life 30 days 09/21/21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for two (2) of 105 sampled residents, facility staff failed to administer pain medication to Resident #118 in accordance with the physician's order; and failed to assess Resident #236's pain before administering Tylenol (pain reliever). The findings include: Review of the facilities policy titled Pain Management revised March 2022, showed: .The relief of pain in resident becomes a priority. It is also our duty to monitor and assess for signs and symptoms of pain, advocate for pain management and meet our goal of keeping resident as comfortable as possible.Meeting resident need for pain management; nursing staff will proceed as follows: -Assess for signs and symptoms of pain which include verbal and nonverbal gestures. - Vital signs if appropriate -note the type of pain -Location of pain -Characteristics of the pain (sharp, stabbing and throbbing etc.) -Rating of Pin numerically on a scale od 0-10 or use of facial expression chart to determine pain severity. -Provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety as evidence by failure to: (1) follow facility policy to make changes in Resident #56's active clinical record; (2) ensure the facility's nurse was competent on how to administer Tiotropium Bromide Aerosol Inhaler for Resident #181; and (3) address Resident #404's intrusive behavior which led to a resident-to resident altercation resulting in serious injury to Resident #404. The resident census on the first day of survey was 255. The findings include: Policy Title: Correction in Resident Medical Records revised 03/2022 documented, .Procedure and Implementation- Whenever there is an error or multiple errors observed in resident(s) medical records or clinical chart. The facility will proceed as follows: The medical staff or clinical staff that made error in the resident electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-20 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolatedEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 105 sampled residents, facility staff failed to: monitor and provide ongoing assessment of the effectiveness of interventions for a resident with a mental or psychosocial disorder; and demonstrate reasonable attempts were made to implement approaches to help meet the behavioral health needs to assure resident safety. Resident #404. The findings include: Review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) dated [DATE], documented, .The charge nurse observed [Resident 404] sitting on the floor besides his roommate's . bed #420A; the charge nurse noticed blood on [Resident #404's] left ear and mouth. The nurse assessed [Resident #404's] left ear and mouth and there was no skin tear or abrasion including his face . [Resident #82] was interviewed he said, that man keeps coming over to my bed side and when I asked him to go back to his side of the bed, he punched me on my stomach and chest and I punched him on the chin and he fell . Review of a Complaint…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, facility staff failed to ensure that medications and biologicals were properly labeled and stored for three (3) of 16 medication carts. The findings include: The facility's policy and procedures for storage of medications revised on 08/2020 stated, .Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier . Procedures: III. Expiration Dating (Beyond-Use Dating) . When the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial is initially broken, the container or vial will be dated . The nurse shall place a date opened sticker on the medication and record the date opened, and the new date of expiration. The expiration date of the vial or container will be 30 days from opening unless the manufacturer recommends another date . If a vial or container is found without a stated date opened, the date opened will automatically default to the date dispensed, and the expiration date will be calculated accordingly .All expired medications will be removed from the active…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-07-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to prepare foods under sanitary conditions as evidenced by missing ceiling tiles in the main kitchen, a dusty electric fan in use in the food preparation area, two (2) of four (4) dietary staff members who failed to wear gloves while clearing off breakfast food trays, and erroneous documentation of dishwashing machine final rinse temperatures. Findings included . During a walk through of dietary services on July 20, 2020, at approximately 9:15 AM, and on July 21, 2020, at approximately 9:30 AM, the following were observed: 1. Ceiling tiles were missing from an area located by the dishwashing machine. 2. A fan, soiled with dust, was observed in use, in the food preparation and service area. 3. Two (2) of four (4) staff members failed to wear gloves while clearing off food trays. 4. During a review of the Dish Machine Temp Log from January 2020, to present, it was noted that the dish machine final rinse temperatures were recorded at less than the minimum, required temperature of 180 degrees Fahrenheit on several…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-07-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to have adequate trash receptacles to dispose of used personal protective equipment (PPE) on the Person Under Investigation (PUI) and COVID-19 Unit; follow acceptable infection control standards to prevent the spread of infection in one (1) of two (2) dressing change observations; and follow acceptable standards to prevent the spread of infection between residents while using a glucose meter. Findings include . 1. The facility failed to have adequate trash receptacles to dispose of used personal protective equipment on the Person Under Investigation (PUI) and COVID-19 Unit. On 7/21/20 at approximately 2:00 PM, observation of rooms [ROOM NUMBER] revealed each room contained a white laundry basket with multiple holes. Three (3) of three (3) of the previously mentioned laundry baskets were lined with red plastic bags and contained used PPEs. The facility staff failed to ensure that used PPE were being properly discarded in the rooms of PUI and COVID…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-07-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to protect the resident's dignity during one (1) of two (2) dressing change observations. Findings include . Resident #135 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses of Cerebrovascular Disease, Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Retention of urine, Pressure Induced Deep Tissue Damage of Sacral Region, Pressure Induced Deep Tissue Damage of Left Heel, Pressure Induced Deep Tissue Damage of Right Heel, Pressure ulcer of Left Elbow, Bacteremia, and Sepsis. During a tour of Unit 5 south on 7/28/2020 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor observed the following: Employee #14 was in the process of changing the dressing to Resident #135's sacral wound. During this time Employee #14 removed the resident's adult brief and sacral wound dressing with gloved hands. Employee #14 then removed the gloves and proceeded to wash his hands. After washing his hands, Employee #14 stated, There are no paper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-07-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for one (1) of 66 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to ensure the physician's order for the resident's code status was reflective of Resident #196 wishes to be a DNR (do not resuscitate). Findings included . Policy: Advance Directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy. Updated 7/1/2020. Procedure #4 The Unit Manager or designee will notify Physician or Nurse Practitioner of advance directives so that appropriate orders can be documented/updated in the resident's medical record. Resident #196 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Degenerative Joint Disease, Closed left Humeral Fracture, Alzheimer's, and Dementia. A review of the Social Worker's progress note dated 6/23/2020 at 17:33 showed, This worker assisted (resident's name) to call her son .Contacted the son back and discussed resident's status and progress. Confirmed that son is the POA/responsible party. He…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-07-29 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to code accurately the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one (1) of 66 sampled residents (Resident #231). Findings included . Resident #231 admitted to the nursing home on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA), Debility due to Acute CVA, hypertension, urinary tract infection (UTI), muscle weakness, major depression, cognitive deficit UTI and thromboembolic stroke. On 08/03/20 at 12:00 PM, review of the Physician's Discharge Summary note dated 5/8/20 at 17:54:05, showed that Resident #231 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 5/11/20; Disposition: discharged home; and Rehabilitation Potential: Good. Nursing Note (5/11/20 at 22:21:44) Resident was discharged home today in stable condition at 1:15 pm. He was escorted by staff to the gate to meet with family. Medications were reviewed with family and were encouraged to assess residents [blood pressure] prior administering meds. They had no questions regarding the medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-07-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for one (1) of 66 sampled residents the facility staff failed to develop a care plan to address Resident #196's code status. Findings include . Resident #196 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Degenerative Joint Disease, Closed left Humeral Fracture, Alzheimer's, and Dementia. A review of the Social Worker's progress note dated 6/23/2020 at 17:33 showed, This worker assisted (resident's name) to call her son .Contacted the son back and discussed resident's status and progress. Confirmed that son is the POA/responsible party. He informed this worker that (Resident's name) will be a long-term care resident. She no longer has the apartment that she had before. We reviewed the assessment and made updates. Son reported that his mother is DNR and that she was always clear about that. He doesn't have email so requested this worker mail the documents that need signing to him in NC [North Carolina]. This worker…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-07-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to update two residents care plans to include the actions and interventions related to preparing one (1) resident for discharge and the code status for one (1) resident in two of 66 sampled residents. Residents' #43 and #159. Findings include . 1.The facility's staff failed to update Resident #43's Care Plan with person centered discharge planning approaches/interventions. Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of anemia, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the progress note dated 3/25/2020 at 17:07 - Social Work Progress: Resident #43 asked the [social worker] to assist him with locating appropriate housing. The [social worker] stated that she would assist him in exploring that option if it is feasible. The initial step is getting assistance in the community . He will need a new [level of care] for the community and a referral to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve foods under sanitary conditions as evidenced by fifteen of nineteen nine-inch sheet pans that were stored wet and ready for use, one (1) of one (1) case of evaporated milk with a Best By date of February 2017, stored for use as emergency food, and three (3) of four (4) puree food dishes that tested at less than 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) from the test tray. Findings included . 1. Fifteen of nineteen nine-inch sheet pans were stored wet, on a ready-for-use shelf. 2. One (1) of one (1) case of evaporated milk with a Best By date of February 28, 2017, was stored for use as an emergency food item. 3. Puree food dishes such as beef (129 degrees F), vegetables (119 degrees F), and bread (117 degrees F) were below 135 degrees F during a test tray assessment on March 19, 2019, at approximately 2:00 PM. During a face-to-face interview on March 18, 2019, at approximately 11:00 AM, Employee #13 acknowledged these findings.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview for one (1) of 68 sampled residents facility staff failed to maintain infection control standard of practicice by failing to use approriate personnel protective equipment (PPE) when providing Foley catheter care for Resident # 591 with Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) in the urine and to ensure that laundry items are handled, stored, and processed in a sanitary manner as evidenced by two (2) of two (2) soiled electrical fans, in use in the clean laundry area, four (4) of four (4) soiled exhaust vents, and fifteen of nineteen nine-inch sheet pans that were stored wet and ready for use. Findings included . According to the Center for Disease Control [CDC] Guidelines for preventing spread of VRE Precautions should wear a gown and gloves for all interactions that may involve contact with the patient or potentially contaminated areas in the patient's environment. Donning gown and gloves upon room entry and discarding before exiting the patient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-03-26 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to maintain essential equipment in safe condition as evidenced by torn and worn door gaskets from two (2) of two (2) steamers in Dietary Services. Findings included . During a walkthrough of the kitchen on March 20, 2019, at approximately 9:00 AM, door gaskets to two (2) of two (2) steamers were worn, torn, and damaged. During a face-to-face interview on March 20, 2019, at approximately 11:30 AM, Employee #13 and/or Employee #14 acknowledged these findings.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-26 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an observation, record review, resident and staff interview for one (1) of 68 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that one resident who was observed with medications at her bedside was cleared by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to self-administer her medications. Resident #248 Findings included. Resident #248 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which include Generalized Muscle Weakness, Type 2 Diabetes without complications, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Cerebral Infarction Unspecified, Alcohol Abuse Uncomplicated, Drug Abuse Counseling and Surveillance of Drug Abuser and Acquired Absence of Right leg below knee. Review of Section C (Cognitive Patterns) of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] and the last quarterly MDS dated [DATE] both show the resident with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15; which indicates that the resident's cognitive ability is intact and she is able to make her own decisions. The resident is coded as a one (1)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-26 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews and facility document review for one (1) of 68 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to provide Resident #7 with quarterly statements within 30 days after the end of the quarter and/or upon request. Findings included . Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which include: Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperlipidemia and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set 12/4/18 showed Section C-Cognitive Patterns: Brief Interview for Mental Status scored as 15 which indicates cognitively intact. During an interview with Resident #7 on 3/18/19 at approximately 11:30 AM, he was asked, do you get a quarterly statements from the facility? Resident #7 responded, I don't get my monthly statements. During an interview on 3/18/19 at 2:00 PM with Employee #3, he stated, yes, the residents are supposed to get their statements but some residents throw them away. I don't have anything to show you that I have given the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an observation, record review and staff and resident interview for one (1) of 68 sampled resident's, the facility staff failed to respect Resident #96's privacy by failing to knock on the resident's door and entering the resident's room without receiving permission to enter. Findings included . Resident #96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Arthritis, Depression, Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure and Renal Insufficiency as recorded in Section I of the annual Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE]. Review of Section G (Functional Status) shows that the resident requires extensive assistance and support from one person for all activities of daily living except transfer and eating. The resident requires assistance from two persons for transfer and only requires cueing and/or oversight for eating. Review of the Brief Interview for Mental Status BIMS in Section C (Cognitive Patterns) showed a score of 15 which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview for one (1) of 68 sampled resident facility staff failed to ensure Resident #186 was free from neglect by failing to assess the resident's care needs after the resident repeatedly called a Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) for assistance. Resident #186. Findings included . Record review of the facility's policy titled Prohibition of Abuse Administration with a revision date of 1/19, showed Neglect- is the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Resident #186 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which include; Anemia, Heart Failure, Hypertension, Alzheimer Disease, Cerebrovascular Accident and Peripheral Vascular Disease. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set [MDS] dated 2/8/19 showed Section C-Cognitive Patterns. Brief Interview for Mental Status [BIMS] is scored as 12 which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, investigative documents, medical record review and staff interview of one (1) of 68 sampled residents facility staff failed to conduct a thorough investigation involving an incident of neglect. Resident# 186. Findings included Record review of the facility's policy titled Prohibition of Abuse Administration with a revision date of 1/19, showed Neglect- is the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Resident# 186 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which include; Anemia, Heart Failure, Hypertension, Alzheimer Disease, Cerebrovascular Accident and Peripheral Vascular Disease. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set [MDS] dated 2/8/19 showed Section C-Cognitive Patterns. Brief Interview for Mental Status [BIMS] is scored as 12 which indicates cognition is moderately impaired. Section G-Functional Status [Activities of Daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-26 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for three (3) of 68 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to document the information communicated to the receiving health care institution for Residents' #126, # 215 and #247. Findings included . 1. The facility staff failed to document the information communicated to the receiving health care institution for Resident #126. Resident #126 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include Anemia, Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Osteoporosis, End Stage Renal Disease, Alzheimer's and Major Depressive Disorder. A review of the Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set [MDS] dated January 21, 2018. Section C [Cognition Patterns] C1000 Cognitive Skills for Daily Decision Making coded 3 Severely impaired which indicates, Resident never/rarely made decisions. A review of the physicians' order dated December 28, 2018, showed, Transfer to the hospital for poor PO intake (unable to swallow) GI consult for G-Tube placement (family agreed to G-tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-26 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify one (1) of 68 residents of the reason for transfer from the facility to the hospital. Resident #215. Findings included . Resident #215 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which include Anemia, End Stage Renal Disease, Hypertension, Pneumonia, Diabetes Mellitus, Depression and Muscle Weakness. A review of the resident's record on March 19, 2018 at 11:00 AM showed he was transferred to hospital from the facility on January 3, 2019. Review of Resident #215's nurse's notes and social work progress note on March 24, 2019 at 9:00 AM showed there was no documentation indicating that the resident and the resident's representative were notified in writing or verbally of the transfer and the reasons for the move in writing. The medical record lacked documentation to support the facility communicated the name of the practitioner who is responsible for the care of the resident, resident's representative contact information, advance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews of three (3) of 68 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one (1) Resident's Discharge to home, for one (1) Resident's use of psychotropic medications and for one (1) resident with a behavioral indicator for psychosis. Residents' #70, #198 and #258. Findings included . 1. Resident #70 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which include: Opioid Use unspecified, Encephalopathy, unspecified, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region (Unstageable), Right Heel (Unstageable) and Left Heel (Unstageable). Review of the Physician Order dated 1/29/19 showed discharge patient to home on 1/31/19 scripts done. Review of the physicians Discharge summary dated [DATE] discharge date : [DATE], disposition: home. Review on the Nursing Home Discharge Minimum Data Set [MDS] dated 2/1/19 showed Cognitive Patterns: Brief Interview for Mental Status scored as 13 which indicate cognitively intact. Review of Identification Information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-26 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview for one (1) of 68 sampled residents, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure that the Level II Pre-admission Screen/Resident Review for Mental Illness and or Mental Retardation screening was completed for Resident #262. Findings included . A review of the Pre-admission Screening/Resident Review for Mental Illness and or Mental Retardation Level I [PASRR] screen, signed as completed by the facility staff on January 9, 2019, revealed that Resident #262 was identified as positive for major mental disorder Schizophrenia, and a Level II screen is required. There is no evidence that the facility staff completed the Level II Pre-admission Screening/Resident Review as indicated from the level I screening. Facility staff failed to ensure that the Level 2 Pre-admission Screen/Resident Review for Mental Illness and or Mental Retardation was completed for Resident #262 who had a diagnosis of Schizophrenia. A face-to-face interview was conducted with Employee #22 on 3/25/2019 at 9:00 AM after a review of the findings she acknowledged that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-26 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview for one (1) of 68 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to provide the resident and or the resident's representative with a written summary of the baseline care plan within 48 hours after the resident's admission to the facility. Resident #591. Findings included Review of the medical record on 3/21/19 at 12:00 PM showed Resident # 591 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: Diabetes Mellitus, End Stage Renal Disease, Urinary Tract Infection, and Malignant Neoplasm of Prostate. Review of Resident #591 Face Sheet showed two Primary Contacts listed. A further review of the medical record showed an unsigned baseline care plan dated 3/18/19 the signature line for the resident, the resident's representative, and the facility's designee was blank (the signature indicates that the resident and/or the resident's representative was made aware of the initial goals and approaches to address the resident's care needs and services.) During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for one (1) of 68 sampled residents facility staff failed to revise/update the care plan after Resident #215's hospitalization. Findings included . Resident #215 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which include Anemia, End Stage Renal Disease, Hypertension, Pneumonia, Diabetes Mellitus, Depression, and Muscle Weakness. On 3 /25/19, at 10:00 AM a review of Resident #215's quarterly Minimum Data Set [MDS] dated 2/24/19, showed Section C [Cognitive Patterns] a Brief Interview for Mental Status [BIMS] with a score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Section G [Functional Status] resident is coded as 1 supervision (oversight, encouragement or cueing) for locomotion on and off the unit. A further review of Resident #215's medical record on 3/25/2019 at 2:00 PM showed the Care Plan was not updated when the resident was hospitalized on 1/3/ 2019. There was no evidence facility staff revised/updated the care plan with goals and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews for one (1) of 68 sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide necessary services to maintain good grooming (Removal of facial hair from chin) and Activities of Daily Living for Resident #223. Findings included . Resident #223 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Section I (Active Diagnoses) of the annual assessment dated [DATE] shows diagnoses which include Anemia, Heart Failure, Hypertension, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), Renal Insufficiency, Viral Hepatitis and Diabetes Mellitus. Review of Section C (Cognitive Patterns) of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], show the resident with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact and able to make her own decisions. And, under Section G (Functional Status) - Activities of Daily Living (ADL) the resident was coded as a three (3), which indicated the resident required extensive assistance from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, family and staff interviews for one (1) of 68 sampled residents facility staff failed to honor the resident's preferences and choice of activities to support her psychosocial well-being. Resident # 201. Findings included . Resident #201was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Acute Pancreatitis, Contracture of Muscle, Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Dependent on Renal Disease. Review of the admission Record showed the husband listed as the Resident Representative and Emergency Contact # 1 and the resident's daughter is listed as the Emergency Contact #2. Review of the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set [MDS] dated 2/6/19, showed Section A1100 [Language] preferred language Spanish, which indicates Spanish is resident's preferred language. A1200. Marital Status in the allocated space the code entered is 2 which indicates the resident is married. Section C [Cognitive Patterns]; Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility staff failed to administer oxygen in accordance with the physician's order for one (1) of 68 sampled residents. Resident #53. Findings included . Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Heart Failure, Hypertension, and Atrial Fibrillation. During an observation on 03/20/19 at approximately 10:40 AM, the dial on Resident # 53's oxygen concentrator was observed to be set at 3 liters. Review of the March 2019 physician's order on 03/20/19 at 10:45 AM showed Resident #53 was to receive Oxygen at 2 liters via nasal cannula. During a face-to-face interview on 03/20/19 at 10:50 AM, Employee #23 acknowledged the finding.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, facility staff failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards as evidenced by privacy curtains that were attached to an electrical power cord in one (1) of 56 resident's rooms. Findings included . During an environmental tour of the facility on March 19, 2019, between 9:07 AM and 2:30 PM, Privacy curtains to Bed (A) and Bed (B) in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] were tied to the power cord to Bed (B) with strands of cloth, one (1) of 56 resident's rooms surveyed. This practice presented an electrical safety hazard to residents, staff and visitors. During a face-to-face interview on March 20, 2019, at approximately 11:30 AM, Employee #14 and Employee #15 acknowledged these findings.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview,the facility staff failed to ensure the filter of an oxygen concentrator was free of dust for one (1) of 68 sampled residents. Resident #53. Findings included . Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Heart Failure, Hypertension and Atrial Fibrillation. On 03/20/19 at 10:40 AM, during an observation of Resident #53, it was noted that the resident's oxygen concentrator filter was covered with dust. A review of the physician's order on 03/20/19 at 10:45 AM showed Resident #53 was to receive oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula continuously for short[sic] of breath .rinse O2 (oxygen) filter with H20 (water), pat dry and replace. During a face-to-face interview on 03/20/19 at 10:50 AM, Employee #23 acknowledged the finding.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-26 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview for one (1) of 68 sampled residents, facility staff failed to monitor and consistently document Resident# 258's aggressive/delusional behavior and to obtain necessary services to address the resident's behavioral health care needs. Findings included . Resident# 258 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], a review of the admission record showed the following diagnoses Anemia Unspecified, Dementia in Other Diseases Classified without Behavioral Disturbance, Delusional Disorders, Unspecified Psychosis and, Heart Failure. Review of the Comprehensive Nursing Home Minimum Data Set [MDS] dated 2/18/19, showed Section C-Cognitive Patterns: Brief Interview for Mental Status [BIMS] resident was scored as 99 which indicate the resident was not able to complete the interview. Section D [0100]- Mood was coded a 0 to indicate resident's mood interview was not conducted (resident is rarely/never understood). Section E [0100] Potential indicators of psychosis allocated box is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff and resident interview for one (1) of 68 sampled residents, facility staff failed to have Resident #166's routine medication available for her use when she requested it. Findings included . Resident #166 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which include Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT), Hypertension, Schizophrenia, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Asthma. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows the resident with a score of 15/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status in Section C (Cognitive Pattern). According to the MDS 3.0 User's Manual, page C-14, a score of '13-15 suggests that the resident is cognitively intact. According to Section G of the MDS (Functional Status) Activities of Daily Living, the resident is assessed as requiring supervision for bed mobility, transfers, ambulation, eating, toilet use and personal hygiene and totally independent for bathing. On March 25, 2019 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for two (2) of 68 sampled residents, facility staff failed to respond to a request from the pharmacist to evaluate one (1) resident's Trazadone and Seroquel and one (1) resident's Zoloft medication for a gradual dose reduction (GDR). Residents' #105 and #173. Findings included . 1. Facility staff failed to respond to a request from the pharmacist to evaluate Resident #105's Trazadone (used to treat bedtime insomnia) and Seroquel medication for a gradual dose reduction (GDR). Resident #105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses, which included Chronic Pancreatitis, Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, and Depression Disorder. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set [MDS] dated 1/4/19 showed Section C: Cognition; Brief Interview for Mental Status [BIMS] scored as 15 which indicates the resident is cognitively intact . A review of the physician's orders and the Medication Administration Records from January 2019 to present showed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview the facility's staff failed to ensure metered dose inhalers Pulmicort (treatment of lung disease) and Spiriva Respimat (treatment of lung disease) were safely stored for one (1) of 68 sampled residents Resident #53. Findings included . Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Heart Failure, Hypertension and Atrial Fibrillation. On 03/20/19 at 10:45AM, Employee # 23 was observed administering the medication to Resident #53. During the observation, it was noted that Pulmicort 180 mcg inhaler was stored in a manufacturers box labeled as Spiriva Respimat 2.5 mcg inhaler and Spiriva Respimat 2.5 mcg inhaler was stored in the manufacturers box labeled as Pulmicort 180 mcg inhaler. The facility's staff failed to ensure Resident #53's metered dose inhalers were safely stored in their appropriate manufacturers boxes. During a face-to-face interview on 03/20/19 at 11:30 AM, Employee # 23 acknowledged the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-04-20 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to record the total number of staff worked and the hours per patient day for one day on the Report of Nursing Staff Directly Responsible for Resident Care form; and failed to maintain 18 months of the posted daily nurse staffing data. The resident census on 04/14/22 was 245. The findings include: Review of the Report of Nursing Staff Directly Responsible for Resident Care form dated 04/14/22 showed the following: Total Census: 245 Number of RN (Registered Nurses) for 7 AM - 3:30 PM - 6 Number of RNs for 3 PM -11:30 PM - 4 Number of RNs for 11 PM -7:30 AM - 3 Number of LPNS (Licensed Practical Nurses) for 7 AM - 3:30 PM - 6 Number of LPNs for 3 PM -11:30 PM - 5 Number of LPNs for 11 PM -7:30 AM - 4 Number of CNA (Certified Nurse Aides) for 7 AM - 3:30 PM - 22 Number of CNAs for 3 PM -11:30 PM - 24 Number of CNAs for 11 PM -7:30 AM - 20 Actual Hours (the total) was left blank; and there were numbers entered for hours per patient day (PPD). The facility's Nursing Staff Directly Responsible for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-04-20 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, facility staff failed to update the Facility Assessment to reflect the facility's current operations. The resident census on the first day of survey was 255. The findings included: The resident alpha census on the first day of survey, 03/26/22, revealed that 255 residents were in the facility. The facility has a licensed bed capacity of 296 residents. Review of the Facility Assessment document last updated 02/24/22 revealed the following: Part 2: Services and Care We Offer Based on our Resident Needs Page 5 Management of Medical Conditions stipulated, The DON (Director of Nursing) with the Admissions department reviews all admission referrals to ensure that resources are available to accommodate all cases. If additional resources are needed in the case of complex referrals, in-service are conducted for nursing staff to meet the particular needs of the referral prior to admission. However, through observation3, record review staff and family interviews, it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2020-07-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations made on July 22, 2020, at approximately 1:20 PM, and on July 23, 2020, at approximately 1:20 PM, facility staff failed to provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a clean area evidenced by several surgical masks, plastic bottles, and debris that were observed in the staff parking lot area and in areas surrounding the emergency generator and the chiller, and a plastic container full of water and other debris that was stored in the loading dock area. Findings included . 1. Observed 15 surgical masks, empty plastic bottles, and other debris discarded on the facility grounds surrounding the staff parking lot, the emergency generator, and the chiller. 2. One (1) of one (1) plastic container, observed in the loading dock area filled with water and other debris and presented as a harborage site for insects. These observations were acknowledged on July 22, 2020, at approximately 1:30 PM, by Employee #13 and on July 23, 2020, at approximately 1:20 PM by Employee #12.
- No harm found · Bcited before2019-03-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, facility staff failed to provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable environment as evidenced by torn privacy curtains in one (1) of 56 resident's rooms, four (4) of four (4) soiled exhaust vents in the Laundry area, and a stained ceiling tile in one (1) of 56 resident's rooms. Findings included . During an environmental tour of the facility on March 19, 2019, between 9:07 AM and 2:30 PM, and on March 20, 2019, at approximately 11:00 AM, the following were observed: 1. Privacy curtains to Bed (A) and Bed (B) in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] were torn, attached to each other with pieces of cloth and tied to the power cord to Bed (B), one (1) of 56 resident's rooms surveyed. 2. Four (4) of four (4) exhaust vents located on the clean area of the laundry room were soiled with dust. 3. A stained ceiling tile was observed in resident room [ROOM NUMBER], one (1) of 56 resident's rooms surveyed. During a face-to-face interview on March 20, 2019, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$97,607 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2026-02-04
- $80,262 — penalty dated 2024-05-23
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROOZ, EFRAIM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 90% | since 04/01/2025 |
| ADDURU, BENJAMIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2025 |
| KIM, REGINA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/16/2026 |
| MATTHEWS, EVETTE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2025 |
| ENHANCE THERAPIES MASTER PAYCO | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2025 |
| NEXT LEVEL HOSPITALITY SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2025 |
| CONTEH, MEMUNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2025 |
| OKOJI, GODSWILL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2025 |
| TEPPER, ELYSE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2025 |
| APEX GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2025 |
| DYNAMIC FISCAL SERVICES, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2025 |
| GAHC3 WASHINGTON DC SNF LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2025 |
| HEALTH CONSULTING SERVICES | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2025 |
| RYTES COMPANY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2025 |
| SCHIAVI WALLACE & ROWE PC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in DC
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the District of Columbia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner. The starred figure is the national median (no state figure published).
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 095019. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2022-04-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.