No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Forest Hills Of Dc

4901 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20008 · Non profit - Other · 55 certified beds · (202) 966-7623 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (202) 966-7623 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609) — most recent Feb 2022Resident-funds citations (F0568, F0569)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (26% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
4601 Connecticut Ave NW · (202) 244-4545 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5013 Connecticut Ave NW · (202) 966-1815 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4465 Connecticut Ave NW · (202) 750-4100 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3950 Chesapeake St NW · (202) 282-2216 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4900 Connecticut Ave NW · (202) 966-5489

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased35.2%20.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.6%5.3%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.4%1.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.1%6.4%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.5%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.8%1.1%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened38.7%16.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.9%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.3%97.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.6%7.6%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control34.8%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.5%8.0%17.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%0.8%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine69.1%73.2%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.2%18.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.0%8.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.351.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.350.551.80better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 263 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

63.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
84.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
not reportedno hours filed
Therapy hours / resident / day

Met the expected recovery: 84.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 119 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF63.2%CMS range 57.6–67.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 6.9–12.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge84.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge88.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge79.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 5.3–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.831.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.57
RN hours/ resident / day
0.41
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.51
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.49
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.47
RN hoursweekends
25.5%
Total nursing turnover
36.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 55 beds and averages 50.1 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.52 on weekdays — 2% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.61 to 1.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-12-06)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2023-08-09)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for one (1) of 32 sampled residents (#7), the facility staff failed to implement adequate supervision and assistance to prevent falls with injury for a cognitively impaired resident identified as a high risk for falls. These failures resulted in actual harm to Resident #7 on 1/2/23. The findings included: Resident #7 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Generalized Muscle Weakness, Dementia, and Alzheimer's Disease. A review of Resident #7's medical record revealed a physician's order dated 06/25/22 that directed, Maintain fall risk precaution at all times every shift. A Facility Reported Incident (DC~11166) received by the State Agency on 11/04/22 documented, 11/04/22 Resident taken to the bathroom at approximately 9:30 PM by a nursing assistant and placed on the toilet. The nursing assistant stepped out to get the resident a fresh gown and the resident was found lying on the floor on the staff's return. The resident had a laceration to the back…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility staff failed to inform residents when changes are made to Medicare covered items and services as soon as reasonably possible as evidenced by the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC), Form CMS-10123, was not given by the facility at least two days before the end of Medicare covered services for two (2) Medicare beneficiary residents in 33 sampled residents. (Resident #61, #68)The findings include:On 03/24/2026 approximately at 4:35 PM, review of the beneficiary notices revealed that Notices of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) were not sent at least two days before end of the covered services.A review of NOMNC sent to Resident #61's representative revealed the following: - Skilled Services Episode Start Date: 09/04/2025 - Last covered day of Part A Service: 09/25/2025 - NOMNC - Employee #5 (Social Worker) wrote on the Signature of Patient or Representative, [Resident Representative's name] acknowledged NOMNC via email on 09/24/2025 at 12:52 pm. The clinical record showed an email exchange dated 09/24/2025 at 10:14 AM between Employee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews, and staff interviews, for two (2) of 33 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to ensure the licensed pharmacist conducted a monthly drug regimen review for one resident and the attending physician, or designee failed to respond to pharmacists' recommendations for one resident. Residents #6 and #26 The findings included: 1. A review of a facility policy titled 'Medication Review' with a review date of 02/11/2026 documented, in part: 6. The Consultant Pharmacist shall review each resident's medication regimen monthly. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of multiple diagnoses that included: Diabetes Mellitus, Dementia, Hypertension and Chronic Kidney Disease. A physician's order dated 08/25/25 documented, oxycodone HCl Oral Tablet 5 MG (milligram) (Hydrochloride - opioid analgesic controlled drug) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain control. severe pain 7-10. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, facility staff failed to prepare and distribute food under sanitary conditions as evidenced by the following observations. The findings include:During an initial kitchen survey in the kitchen on 03/24/2026 approximately at 10:15 AM, the following observations were made: Undated shredded cheese in opened plastic bag inside refrigeratorMultiple half gallons milk in the reach-in refrigerator passed their sell-by dates 3/23/2026), content looked settledCondensation water leaking onto packaged food (potato fries in plastic bags) in the walk-in freezer.Employee # 9 (kitchen manager) checked food (tuna salad) temperature before washing handsSignificant food residue built-up on cooking equipment and floor at the cooking and dish washing areasExcessive limescale accumulation on interior surfaces of the automatic dish washing machineA dish washing employee used towel to dry-up food contact surfaces of the washed-sanitized kitchenware.Mold on wall surfaces and caulk lines at the automatic dish washing area.Employee #7 (Corporate chef)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews for two (2) of 33 sampled residents, it was determined that facility staff failed to show documented evidence that they provided nursing care and treatment for a resident on aspiration precautions; and for a resident on fall precautions and at risk for pressure injury. Residents' #10, #1.The findings included: A facility policy titled 'Charting and Documentation' and 'Electronic Medical Records' with review dates of 02/11/2026 documented, in part: Documentation in the medical record will be objective, complete and accurate. Electronic records are an acceptable form of medical record management.1. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Dementia, Parkinson's Disease and Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition.A physician's order dated 01/23/26 documented, ASPIRATION PRECAUTIONS EVERY SHIFT.A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that facility staff coded a Brief Interview for Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, facility staff failed to maintain essential kitchen equipment (walk-in freezer) in good order.The findings include:During the initial tour in the kitchen on 03/24/2026 approximately at 10:15 AM, the following observation was made: The condensation pipe conveying condensate wastewater from air condenser in the walk-in freezer has been leaking. During a face-to-face interview on 03/24/2026, approximately at 10:30 AM, the above observation was acknowledged by Employee #6 (Kitchen Manager) and Employee #7 (Corporate Chef).

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests (flies).The findings included:During the initial kitchen tour on 03/24/ 2026 approximately at 10:15 AM, it was observed multiple live flies at the juice counter and dish washing areas.Record review of the pest control report from Bay City pest management Co. Inc dated 2.19.2026 in part .Kitchen - Inspected. Some general cleaning is needed under equipment on cooking line. Clean floor along wall an floor drain under 3 compartment sink in dish room. Clean corner area of floor under juice counter. Everything else was ok.Record review of the pest control report from Bay City pest management Co. Inc dated 7.18.2025 in part .Kitchen - Inspected. Floor area along wall under counters and behind cooking equipment need to be cleaned. There area a lot of food debris in areas. Small center drain on cooking line needs to be cleaned. Everything else was ok.During a face-to-face interview on 03/24/2026, approximately at 10:15 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents, the facility's staff failed to ensure a resident's assessment reflected the type of facility where she was previously admitted . (Resident #1) The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of Acute Pulmonary Embolism and Hypertension. According to the admission intake form dated 12/13/24, Resident #1 was being discharged from an out-of-state nursing home. An Entry Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that the resident was discharged from short-term general hospital. During a telephone interview on 12/27/24 at 1:34 PM, Employee #8 (MDS Coordinator) stated that she coded the resident as being discharged from a hospital based on the hospital discharge summary provided by the nursing staff. She said that she was informed by Employee #2 (Director of Nursing) that the resident had been discharged from a nursing home.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents, the facility failed to: administer Eliquis(anticoagulant)at the currently prescribed dose [5mg by mouth two-times a day]. And, Metoprolol (beta blocker) in the currently prescribed formulary [Succinate Extended Release].(Resident #1) The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of Acute Pulmonary Embolism and Hypertension. A review of Resident #1's admission packet from the facility's admission Office revealed the following pre-admission documents: -An out-of-state hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] documented that the resident was hospitalized between 12/05/24 and 12/10/ 24 with Acute Pulmonary Embolism. The discharge summary also revealed that the following medications were prescribed: Apixaban (Eliquis) 5 mg 2 tablets (10 mg) by mouth daily 2 times a day for 6 days. Then take [Eliquis 5 mg] 1 tablet (5mg) by mouth two (2) times daily . Metoprolol Succinate ER (exten…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not administered unnecessary medications. This was evident for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of Acute Pulmonary Embolism and Hypertension. A review of Resident #1's medical record showed that the resident was discharged from an out-of-state nursing home prior to her admission on [DATE]. Continued review of the resident's medical record revealed multiple documents from the discharging nursing home including: -A hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] documenting the resident was hospitalized between 12/05/24 and 12/10/ 24 with Acute Pulmonary Embolism. The discharge summary also revealed that the following medications were prescribed: Apixaban (Eliquis) 5 mg 2 tablets (10 mg) by mouth daily 2 times a day for 6 days. Then take [Eliquis 5 mg] 1 tablet (5mg) by mouth two (2) times daily . -A discharge summary from an out-of-state…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure a medication cart was locked and secure from residents, visitor, and other personnel for one (1) of two medications observed on Unit 2. The findings included: A policy titled, Security of Medication Cart, instructed staff to secure medications carts during medication passing to prevent unauthorized use when parking carts in hallways place cart against the wall with drawers facing the wall .carts must be securely lacked at all times when out of the nurse's view . On 12/27/24 at approximately 9:24 AM, an unlocked medication cart was observed parked in a common with drawers facing forward, visible and accessible to anyone passing by. There were no staff members in view of the medication cart. Additionally, residents and staff were gathered in a dining area nearby. During a face-to-face interview on 12/27/24 at 9:25 AM, Employee #8 (RN) stated that the cart should be locked, and he would go get Employee #9 (LPN) who was passing medication in the dining area. During a face-to-face interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Medication Administration Record included the correct formulary for a medication used to treat elevated blood pressure for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents. (Resident #1) The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of Acute Pulmonary Embolism and Hypertension. A review of Resident #1's medical record revealed that the resident was discharged from an out-of-town nursing home on [DATE]. The discharge summary documented that the resident was prescribed . Metoprolol Succinate [Toprol XL] Extended Release 50 mg one (1) tablet by mouth at bedtime. A physician order dated 12/19/24 instructed, Metoprolol Tartrate [Lopressor] 50 mg one (1) tablet by mouth at bedtime for elevated blood pressure. The December 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed an order for Metoprolol Tartrate [Lopressor] 50 mg one (1) tablet by mouth at bedtime for elevated blood pressure. According to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to distribute and serve foods under sanitary conditions. These findings have the potential to affect all residents. The findings included: 1. An open pack of provolone cheese and a pan with chunks of grapefruit were stored in a refrigerator undated, in the kitchen on unit Healthcare 1. 2. Two (2) of 14 white cutting boards, and two (2) of 14 green cutting boards in the main kitchen were soiled and discolored. 3. Food temperature logs from the main kitchen, and the kitchen on healthcare 1 and 2, were missing several entries throughout the month of October 2024. 4. One (1) of two (2) convection ovens in the main kitchen (bottom), was soiled. 5. Two (2) of eight (8) fire suppression nozzles, located above the grease fryer and the gas stove were soiled with grease deposits, and one (1) of eight (8) was corroded. 6. One (1) of two (2) fire sprinkler heads in the walk-in refrigerator was soiled and rusty. Employee #5 (Director of Dietary Services) acknowledged the findings during a face-to-face interview on 12/5/2024, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, for two (2) out of 19 sampled residents, facility staff failed to accurately code their Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. (Residents #11 and #57) The findings included: 1. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Hypothyroidism. Review of the resident's medical record revealed the following: A physician's order dated 01/04/23 that directed, Aripiprazole 5 mg (milligrams) by mouth every night for Depression. A physician's order dated 03/23/23 that directed, Remeron Oral Tablet 15 MG, give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for Depression. A physician's order dated 10/02/23 that directed, Fetzima Oral Capsule Extended Release 24 Hour 120 MG, give 1 capsule by mouth one time a day for Depression. Physician's order dated 03/12/24 that directed, Abilify Oral Tablet 5 MG (Aripiprazole), give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Depression. In addition,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) out of 19 sampled residents, facility staff failed to develop a care plan with goals and interventions to address Resident #11's use of antibiotics. The findings included: Review of the facility's Care plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy (not dated) documented: - A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Hypothyroidism. Review of the resident's medical record revealed a physician's order dated 03/14/24 that directed, Trimethoprim (type of antibiotic) oral tablet 100 MG (milligrams), give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for UTI (urinary tract infection) prophylaxis. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, for one (1) of 19 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to update and revise the care plan with resident-centered goals for Resident #55 following a fall that occurred on 07/13/24. The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Managing Falls and Falls Risks with a revision date of 08/21/21, documented the following: If falling recurs despite initial interventions, staff will implement additional or different interventions or indicate why the current approach remains relevant. Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included the following: Difficulty Walking, Unspecified Lack of Coordination, Cognitive Communication Deficit, and Repeated Falls. A review of Resident #55's medical record revealed a progress note dated dated 07/12/24 at 8:24 AM, documenting, During the shift report, staff heared (sp) noise from room [ROOM NUMBER]. Immediately responded to noise and all of us went to room [ROOM NUMBER].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) out of 19 sampled residents, facility staff failed to implement their antibiotic stewardship system for monitoring antibiotic use and adverse reactions for one (1) resident since 03/14/24, approximately nine (9) months. (Resident #1) The findings included: Review of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship - Review and Surveillance of Antibiotic Use and Outcomes policy (not dated) documented: - Antibiotic usage and outcome data will be collected and documented using facility-approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. - The IP (Infection Preventionist) or designee, will review antibiotic utilization as part of the antibiotic stewardship program. - All resident antibiotic regimens will be documented on the facility approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Hypothyroidism. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-09 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for four (4) of 32 sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide written notice of the bed hold policy to include the number of bed hold days to the resident or their responsible party upon transfer to the emergency room. Residents' #197, #253, #27 and #98. The findings included: The facility policy Bed Hold documented, . At the time of transfer or leave of absence, the social worker will notify the resident/responsible party of the transfer and the number of bed-hold days remaining . 1. Resident #197 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Repeated Falls, Muscle Weakness, Unsteadiness on Feet and Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility. Review of Resident #197's medical record revealed: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed facility staff coded: a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 15, indicating intact cognition. A Health Status Note dated 11/03/22 at 8:20 AM documented: On 11/3/22 around…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to revise and update person-centered care plans for 4 (four) of 32 sampled residents. Residents #12, #41, #17, and #23 The findings included: The facility policy Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered documented, .Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' condition change . The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) must review and update care plan . when the desired outcome is not met, when the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay . 1. Facility staff failed to update Resident #12's care plan to show that the resident had sustained a fall with injuries. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Unspecified Fall, Multiple Fractures of Pelvis without Disruption of Pelvic Ring, Displaced Intertrochanter Fracture of Right Femur, Osteoporosis, Unsteadiness on Feet, and Generalized Muscle Weakness. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-09 · tag F0849 — pattern
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure that three (3 ) of 32 sampled residents had hospice care plans that included: a description of the care, services, and frequency of visits to be provided by the contracted hospice provider. Residents' #252, #4, #23 The findings included: Review of the facility's Hospice contract documented, .Hospice plan of care means a written plan which is established, maintained, reviewed and modified if necessary . which includes . details concerning the scope of frequency of such hospice services . Nursing Home shall develop a nursing home plan of care in coordination with the hospice plan of care . Nursing home will periodically review and modify the nursing home plan of care in coordination with hospice .The Nursing Home shall prepare and maintain complete and detailed clinical records for each residential hospice patient receiving nursing home and hospice services . each medical record shall completely, promptly and accurately documents all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0575 — isolated
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to visibly post signage of the accurate contact information for the State Survey Agency to ensure residents and resident representatives were able to file a complaint. The facility census was 43 on the first day of the survey. The findings included: A Complaint (DC~11004) received by the State Agency on [DATE] at 11:19 AM documented, . She [ resident's daughter] made her [resident 's daughter] complaint to the Ombudsman Office and had been leaving messages for [State Agency Program Manager's name] as posted around the facility. She [residents daughter] learned a few days later that [ contact person name] was deceased , but the signage does not reflect an alternative person to contact. During an observation on [DATE] at 10:30 AM, an 8x10 binder marked Grievance Forms sign posted on the First-Floor unit board at the elevator instructed the resident to After completing a grievance form, please contact the Social Worker . or Charge Nurses to collect the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for one (1) of 32 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to notify a resident, their representative, or the Ombudsman of the reason for the resident's transfer to the hospital in writing. Resident #253. The findings included: Resident #253 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Left Hip Arthroplasty, Thrombosis Distal Left Cephalic Vein, Bilateral Leg Swelling, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Osteoporosis. Resident #253's medical record revealed the following: A Face Sheet that documented that the resident had a representative. A Five (5)-Day Scheduled Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed that facility staff did not complete Section C (cognitive patterns). A Change in Condition Note dated 11/07/21 at 4:08 PM documented: Situation: Resident reported that her left calf is hurting. Background: Resident .admitted with a diagnosis of left hip replacement . A quick assessment was done; she was noted with a swollen left leg calf…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, for three (3) of 32 sampled residents, facility staff failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one who had a fall, one resident's Drug Regimen Review, and one resident's hospice services. Residents' #7, #35 and #252. 1. Facility staff failed to accurately code Resident #7's MDS for Drug Regimen Review. Resident #7 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, Anxiety Disorder, Dementia and Generalized Muscle Weakness. Pharmacy drug regimen review dated 01/02/23 documented, Recommend a psych consult for continued use of Sertraline, donepezil, and melatonin in context of fall on 01/02/23[doctors name] the psychiatrist. Physician response: Disagree continue for anxiety. The evidence showed the facility staff failed to accurately code the MDS for Resident #7 drug regimen review identify potential clinically significant medication issues that was recommende by the pharmacy on 01/02/23. A review of the follow-up note to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for two (2) of 32 sampled residents, facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive resident centered care plan to address: Resident #199's right toe wound and Resident #7's use of antianxiety medications. Residents' #199 and #7. The findings included: The facility policy care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered documented, .The care plan interventions are derived from thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment .The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will: include measurable objectives .incorporate identified problem areas . identifying problem areas and their causes, and developing interventions that are targeted and meaningful to the resident . 1. Facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive resident centered care plan to address Resident #199's right toe wound. Resident #199 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Atrial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, for one (1) of 32 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that the resident received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain hearing abilities. Resident #299. The findings included: Resident #299 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Hard of Hearing, Blindness and Parkinson's Disease. Review of Resident #299's medical record revealed: A physician's order dated 05/28/20 that directed, Nursing staff to check/ensure resident has both hearing aids. Please document in progress notes every shift. A care plan focus area initiated on 12/03/20 documented, Hearing Aides .Goal: [resident's name] uses hearing aides r/t (related to) hard of hearing .Interventions/Tasks: Change first hearing aid batteries routinely every Friday on 3-11 shift .Change second hearing aid batteries routinely every Friday on 3-11 shift .Check first and second hearing aid for functioning prior to use .Place second hearing aids in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on two (2) observations, record reviews and staff interviews, for one (1) of 32 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that the system to account for the reconciliation, dispensing, and administration of controlled medications was followed. Resident #41. The findings included: The facility policy Controlled Substances documented, The facility shall comply with all laws, regulations and other requirements related to to .documentation of schedule II and other controlled substances .an individual resident controlled substance record must be made for each resident who will be receiving a controlled substance . This record must contain . time of administration . signature of nurse administering medication . 1A. During an observation on 07/30/23 at 6:58 AM of the 2nd floor, medication cart 2's Controlled Drug Shift Count Sheet, it was noted that Employee #5 (Registered Nurse) had signed her name in the area, Nurse off and documented yes in the area drug count correct?. When asked why she had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on one (1) observation, record review and staff interview, a multi-dose Humalog (type of Insulin) pen was stored for use that failed to have a resident label or an expiration date. The findings included: The facility policy Administering Medications directed, .the expiration/beyond use date on the mediation label is checked . When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened is recorded on the container . Insulin pens are clearly labeled with the resident's name . During an observation of the 1st floor medication storage room on 07/30/23 at 6:45 AM, it was noted that there was an open and used Humalog pen that failed to have a resident label or an expiration/beyond-use date. During a face-to-face interview conducted at the time of the observation, Employee #4 (Registered Nurse/RN) acknowledged the finding and stated, It's a mistake. Cross Reference 22B DCMR Sec. 3227.19

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, for one (1) of 32 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure Resident #41 received the correct food consistency ordered by the physician. The findings included: Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Dysphagia and Protein Calorie Malnutrition. Review of Resident #41's medical record showed the following: An active physician's order dated 07/10/23 that directed, Regular diet, pureed texture, thin consistency An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed facility staff coded: a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 15, indicating intact cognition and received a mechanically altered diet. A Speech Language Therapy Evaluation and Plan of Treatment Summary dated 07/20/23 recommended, .Solids - mechanical soft textures . An active physician's order dated 07/27/23 directed, Other diet, mechanical soft/chopped meats texture. During a face-to-face interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview, facility staff failed to store and distribute food under sanitary condition as evidenced by food items such as brown gravy, baked fish, bread chunks, a squash and zucchini dish, and two (2) liters of a white sauce, stored in various containers in one (1) of one (1) walk-in refrigerator that were not labeled, food items such as five (5) of five (5) containers with chopped and sliced carrots, one (1) of one (1) container of red onions, one (1) of one container of sliced celery, one (1) of one (1) container of chopped cabbage, one (1) of one (1) container of sliced yellow squash, one (1) of one container of sliced zucchini, one (1) of one (1) container of sliced cucumbers, and one (1) of one (1) container of sliced tomatoes, that were labeled with a use-by date of July 29, 2023, one (1) one (1) open pack of cheddar cheese that was labeled with a use-by date of 7/3/23, two (2) of two (2) bottles of eyewash solutions located in the kitchen on Healthcare Center 2 (HCC2) that expired as of 08/2022, and one (1) of one (1) bottle of eyewash solution…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-02-25 · tag F0568 — widespread
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, facility staff failed to ensure resident funds were not commingled with the funds of any other person other than another resident. The facility census was 45. (Identifiers for Non-Residents'- TF1, TF2 and TF3) The findings included: Review of the facility's trial balance report dated 2/18/22 showed a total of 18 resident accounts. When the writer reconciled the trial balance report with the facility census report dated 2/17/22, it was revealed that three (3) of 18 (TF1, TF2, and TF3) accounts listed on the trail balance report did not belong to residents that reside in the skilled nursing facility. Review of the Facility's Assisted Living Census/Resident Roster showed that TF1 and TF2 were listed as residents of the Assistant Living ; and TF3 was a resident of the facility's Memory Care Unit. During a face-to-face interview on 02/22/22 at 2:30 PM, Employee #19, (Chief Financial Officer) reviewed the documents and stated that the names [TF1, TF2, and TF3] and accounts listed on the trial balance report were not residents of the skilled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to prepare and serve foods under sanitary conditions as evidenced by four (4) of four (4) damaged cutting boards, one (1) of one (1) soiled salamander grill, one (1) of one (1) fire extinguisher that was past due its yearly inspection date, four (4) of eight (8) soiled fire suppression nozzles, one (1) of three (3) dishwashing machines that leaked from the bottom when used, and one (1) of three (3) dishwashing machine that did not consistently reach a minimum final rinse temperature of 180 degrees Fahrenheit. The findings included: During a walkthrough of dietary services on February 17, 2022, at approximately 10:30 AM and on February 24, 2022, at approximately 9:45 AM, the following were observed: 1. Two (2) of two (2) red cutting boards and one (1) of one (1) white cutting board that were stored for use, and one (1) of one (1) green cutting board that was being used to slice carrots were damaged with deep grooves that could possibly inhibit bacteria and odor. 2. One (1) of One (1) salamander grill was soiled with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, for five (5) of 32 sampled residents, the facility's staff failed to maintain Infection Control Practices to minimize or prevent the potential spread of infection as evidenced by: (1) staff not performing hand hygiene before serving a lunch tray for one (1) resident; (2) staff not performing hand hygiene between care (hygiene) for two (2) residents; (3) staff not providing a barrier during wound care for 1 resident; and (4) not wearing clean gloves when changing bed linen for one (1) resident. (Residents' #1, #2, #9, #17, and #239). The findings included: 1. The facility's staff failed to perform hand hygiene before serving Resident #9 her lunch tray. Review of a policy titled, Assisting the Impaired Resident with In Room Meals, instructed staff to, wash their hands before serving food to residents . Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Dementia without Behavioral Disturbances and Dysphagia. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-25 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to maintain essential equipment in safe condition as evidenced by one (1) of one (1) high temperature dishwashing machine in the main kitchen that did not reach a minimum final rinse temperature of 180 degrees Fahrenheit on two (2) of three (3) observations, and one (1) of one (1) dishwashing machine in second floor kitchen that consistently leaked from the bottom when in use. The findings included: 1. One (1) of one (1) dishwashing machine in the main kitchen failed to reach a minimum of 180 degrees Fahrenheit on two (2) of three (3) observations on February 24, 2022, at approximately 9:45 AM. The contracting repair company ([NAME]) came in and determined that one (1) of three (3) heater elements inside the machine was inoperative, but the machine was still able to reach a minimum final rinse temperature of 180 degrees Fahrenheit on most occasions. A replacement part was ordered, and the machine was used to clean and disinfect dishes along with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-25 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, facility staff failed to ensure that one (1) resident's funds were conveyed within 30 days of their death. The facility census was 45. (Resident #289) The findings included: Review of the facility's trial balance dated [DATE] showed a total of 18 resident accounts. Review of the trial balance report showed that Resident #289 had a resident funds account with a balance of $1659.69. The status of the account was recorded as frozen as of [DATE]. According to the Death in Facility Tracking Record, Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] showed that Resident #289 was coded as follows: Section A2000 (discharge date ) was recorded as [DATE]; and Under Section A2100 Discharge Status the resident was coded as deceased . During a face-to-face interview on [DATE] at approximately 4:30 PM, Employee #19, (Chief Financial Officer) stated, The accountant (facility staff) believed Social Security would take back the January [2022] Social Security Administration payment due to death so she is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews for three (3) of 32 sampled residents, facility staff failed to offer residents or their representatives an opportunity to formulate an Advance Directive. (Residents' #20, #37 and #38). The findings included: 1.Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease, Alzheimer's Disease, and Non-Alzheimer's Dementia. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] showed in Section C (Cognitive Patterns) Resident #20 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS ) summary score of 06, indicating severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #20 's medical record revealed: [DATE] [physician's order] instructed, CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation). [DATE] [care plan] showed the following: - Focus Area: Code status showed, Full Code. - Goal: All staff will remain aware of [resident's name] wishes regarding code status and will ensure proper documentation. - Interventions included: Clarify [resident's name] code…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and family interview, the facility's staff failed to inform a resident's family member about the resident's change in status (bruise to right brow) for one (1) of 32 sampled residents. (Resident #19) The findings included: Review of a policy titled, Accident /Incident instructed staff to, report the accident/incident to his/her immediate supervisor as soon as practicable . During a face-to-face interview on 02/17/22 at approximately 11:30 AM, Resident #19's daughter (responsible party) stated that when she visited her mother in January (2022), she observed her mother with a left black eye and swollen area on her forehead on the same side. However, no one from the facility made her aware. When she asked staff about her mother's injuries, they informed her that her mother hit her face on the side rail during the night. Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had multiple diagnoses including Muscle Weakness, Repeat Falls, and Insomnia. Review of an incident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for three (3) of 32 sampled residents, facility staff failed to implement its written policy and procedure to investigate injuries of unknown source. (Residents' #4, #11 and #189) The findings included: Review of the facility's document provided to the surveyor on 02/23/22 entitled, Reporting Incident Process revealed: . Reportable incidents/accidents include, but not limited to . injuries of unknown origin . pressure injuries, skin tears .Investigation: Interview all staff working at the time, or if necessary, staff working previous shifts, of incident and collect written witness statements from all staff . 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Non-Dominant Side, Peripheral Vascular Disease and Muscle Weakness. Review of the medical record revealed the following: Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], facility staff coded a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, for three (3) of 32 sampled residents facility staff failed to report to the State Agency: (1) a facility-reported-incident (FRI) involving a medication error for one (1) resident;(2) a FRI involving an injury of unknown origin for one resident; and (3) a FRI involving an accident(fall) within the required time frame of 24 hours for one (1) resident. (Residents' #3, #20 and #239). The findings included: 1. The facility's staff failed to report a FRI involving a medication error to the State Agency for Resident #3. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, and Psychosis. During multiple observations from 02/17/22 to 02/25/22 starting at approximately 11:00 AM to approximately 5:00 PM, Resident #3 was noted in his room, well groomed, calm and cooperative with staff. Review of the medical record showed the following: 11/06/20 [physician order]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-25 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 32 sampled residents, facility staff failed to convey a resident's comprehensive care plan goals to the receiving provider during three (3) hospital transfers. (Resident #20) The findings included: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease, Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis. History of hip fracture, Alzheimer's Disease, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, History of Falls with Multiple Injuries, and Dislocation of Internal Right Hip Prosthesis. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed the following: In Section C (Cognitive Patterns) - the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 12, indicating mildly impaired cognition. In Section G (Functional Status)- Resident #20 was coded as being totally dependent and required the physical assistance of one-person for bed mobility and dressing. The resident was also coded a s totally dependent and requiring the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded for a resident's discharge status for one (1) of 32 sampled residents. (Resident #141) The findings included: Review of the Physician's orders showed the following: 11/23/21 at 3:00 PM - T.O. (Telephone order) . Resident may be discharge (sp) home when ready; 11/24/21- Discharge home. The Physician's Discharge Summary signed and dated by the physician on 11/24/21 for Resident #141 showed: admission date -11/19/21 discharge date - 11/24/21. Final Diagnosis- Cerebrovascular Accident, Other Significant Diagnosis: Dementia, Hypertension, Glaucoma and Hyperlipidemia. Disposition- Discharge with approval; Destination - Home. According to the Discharge Reporting Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] the resident was coded as being discharged assessment -return not anticipated from the facility under Section F (Entry/Discharge Reporting); Under Section A2100 Discharge Status the Resident was coded as being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-25 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview for one (1) of 32 sampled residents, facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan to include Residents low vision resulting from an active diagnosis of Macular degeneration within 48 hours of admission to the facility. (Resident #139) The findings included: Resident #139 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Nonexudative Age Related Macular Degeneration Right Eye Stage Unspecified. During a face-to-face interview on 02/23/22 at 11:22 AM, Resident #139 stated I have Macular Degeneration. I can't hardly see. I'm afraid I'm going to knock my glass of water over. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident #139, who was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] showed the resident had a diagnosis of Nonexudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration Right Eye Stage Unspecified listed on her face sheet, Medication Administrative Record, Treatment Administration Record and Comprehensive-Care Plans from previous…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews for two (2) of 32 sampled residents, the facility's staff failed to: (1) assess one (1) resident for edema to her left arm; and (2) follow physician's order to spoon feed one (1) resident at all meals. (Residents' #39 and #139) The findings included: 1.The facility's staff failed to assess for edema that was present in Resident #139's left arm. Resident #139 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including Acute Kidney Failure, Muscle Weakness, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following: In section C (Cognitive Patterns) the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 15 indicating intact cognition. In section G (Functional Status) G0110 Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance, Bed Mobility facility staff coded extensive assistance and resident requires one-person physical assist Transfer, facility staff coded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and responsible party and staff interview, the facility's staff failed to ensure durable medical equipment (sling of a sit-to-stand mechanical lift) was in good working condition before transferring (to the commode) Resident #19, who subsequently had an assisted fall without injuries. The findings included: Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had an history of multiple diagnoses including Muscle Weakness, Repeated Falls, Obesity, and Transient Ischemic Attack. The Department of Health (DOH) received the following updated incident report on 11/29/21: During transfer to bathroom with 2 CNAs (certified nurse aide) with sit to stand lift during pm care, the sling hooked to the machine broke thereby causing resident to be lowered to the floor in a sitting position [on 11/26/21 at 9:30 PM]. The 2 CNAs called Charge Nurse and 2 other persons to assist resident off the floor after the head-to-toe assessment was conducted on the resident. Range of motion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-25 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident and staff interview, the physician failed to review the resident's complete health record to include residents' diagnosis of Macular Degeneration for one (1) of 32 sampled residents. (Resident #139) The findings included: Resident #139 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including Nonexudative Age Related Macular Degeneration Right Eye Stage Unspecified. During a face-to-face interview conducted on 02/23/22 at 11:22 AM, Resident #139 stated I have Macular Degeneration I can't hardly see. I'm afraid I'm going to knock my glass of water over. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident #139, who was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] showed the resident had a diagnosis of Nonexudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration Right Eye Stage Unspecified listed on her face sheet, Medication Administrative Record, Treatment Administration Record and Comprehensive-Care Plans from previous stay at the facility (admitted on [DATE] and discharged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview during a tour of one (1) of two (2) medication storage rooms, facility staff failed to ensure that three (3) of three (3) insulin vials were dated when first opened. The findings included . According to the manufacture's storage instructions, The Lantus vials you are using should be thrown away after 28 days, even if it still has insulin left in it. https://www.lantus.com/how-to-use/how-to-inject According to the manufacture's storage instructions, Recommended storage conditions for NovoLog Insulin is 28 days after first use. https://www.novonordiskmedical.com/our-products/storage-and-stability.html On 02/17/22 at approximately 2:40 PM in the presence of Employee # 16 (Nurse Supervisor) an observation of the first floor medication refrigerator was conducted and the following was noted: Two (2) of 2 vials of Lantus Insulin 100 units were observed open with no date recorded (written) on the vial or the holding/outer container to indicate the first date it was open for use. One (1) of 1 vial of Novolog Insulin was observed opened with no date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interview, the facility staff failed to accurately document a resident's Advance Directive directions (wish) to be a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) in the medical record one (1) of 32 sampled residents. (Resident #36) The findings include: Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included, Dysphagia, Oropharyngeal Phase, Unspecified Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Abnormal Weight Loss, Unspecified Glaucoma and Unspecified Dementia Without Behavioral Disturbance. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated on [DATE], the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 03 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the medical record revealed a document titled, Advance Directives signed and dated by Resident #36 and his Power-of-Attorney on [DATE]. The Advance Directive form documented that the resident's code status as No Code/Do Not Resuscitate. However, review of an active physician's order dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
AL-ASKARI, YASAMINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 03/11/2025
CLARK, CYRILLENEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 03/11/2025
ESKEW, TUCKERIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 03/11/2025
FISKE, KIMBERLYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2026
REID, DAHLIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/29/2026
SANDRI, TINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/11/2025
SCOTT, CRYSTALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/18/2026

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-21.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 24%Medicare 14%Other / private 62%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$652per resident / day
operating cost
$19,834per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$535per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in DC

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the District of Columbia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in District of Columbia
$9,581/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)*
$10,798/mo
Nursing home (private)*
$6,200/mo
Assisted living*

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner. The starred figure is the national median (no state figure published).

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 095038. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next