Ingleside At Rock Creek
3050 Military Road NW, Washington, DC 20015 · Non profit - Corporation · 34 certified beds · (202) 363-8310 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569, F0570)
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $39,419 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-26)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.4% | 20.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.3% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.2% | 1.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.8% | 6.4% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.2% | 1.1% | 3.3% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.4% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.5% | 7.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 35.7% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.8% | 8.0% | 17.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 0.8% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 70.5% | 73.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 12.0% | 18.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.1% | 8.6% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.69 | 1.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.28 | 0.55 | 1.80 | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
72.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 169 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 64.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 114 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 72.2%CMS range 66.3–78.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 6.6–14.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 64.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 58.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 54.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.1%CMS range 3.3–10.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.79 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 34 beds and averages 29.1 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.26 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.56 to 2.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews for one (1) of 21 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to adequately monitor a resident with a history of Dementia and prior exit-seeking behaviors. Subsequently, the resident eloped from the third-floor unit located in Building One and was found wandering outside of the facility near a busy intersection. (Resident #24) Due to these failures, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on March 26, 2025, at 1:09 PM. The facility provided a plan of action to address the immediacy on March 26, 2025, at 6:43 PM and it was accepted. Review of the facility's plan determined that the immediate jeopardy was Past Non-Compliance due to corrections being completed prior to the start of the recertification date. The facility immediate jeoparyd existed until Janury 29, 2025. The findings included: According to CMS (Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services), an elopement score refers to a score used in elopement risk assessments and defines elopement as a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews for two (2) of 21 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan, and develop a discharge plan, for two residents. (Residents #8, #35.) The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to develop a care plan for Resident #8's dysphagia which was documented in the medical record. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included the following: Dementia Unspecified Severity with Agitation, Age Related Osteoporosis, Personal History of Urinary Tract Infection and Altered Mental Status. A review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) DC~12784, submitted to the State Agency on 04/01/24 revealed the following: At around 2.10am on 3-31-24 when the assigned charge nurse was making rounds, found patient on the floor beside her bed lying on her side, patient appear to be in no acute distress but complained of both knee and both ankle pain, suddenly 911 just arrived on the floor that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review staff interviews and resident interviews, for seven (7) of 21 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to have documented evidence that the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) reviewed or revised care plans or conducted care plan conferences after each Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. (Residents' #1, #7 #8, #13 #15, #18, and, #20). The findings included: 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Osteoporosis, Arthritis, Dementia, Muscle weakness, and CVA with left side weakness. Resident #1's medical record showed the facility's staff completed the following MDS assessments: a quarterly on 08/31/24 and 12/01/24. However, further review of the record lacked documented evidence that the IDT reviewed Resident #1's care plan or conducted a care plan conference after the two (2) previously mentioned assessments. A review of the resident's face sheet revealed she had a legal guardian listed as her responsible party. An observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the attending physician failed to document in the resident's medical record a response, if applicable, to address the pharmacist identified irregularities for five (5) of 21 sampled residents. Residents' #18, #2, #8, #4 and #15. The findings included: An undated policy titled, Medication Regimen Review documented in part: - Policy Statement: The Consultant Pharmacist reviews the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly. - The attending physician documents in the medical record that the irregularities has been reviewed and what (if any) action was taken to address it. - The goal of the MRR (Medication Regimen Review) is to promote positive outcomes while minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication[s]. - The Consultant Pharmacist provides the Director of Nursing Services and Medical Director with a written, signed and dated copy of all medication regimen reports. - Copies of medication regimen review reports, including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for one (1) of 21 sampled residents, the facility's staff failed to immediately inform the administrative staff or resident's physician that the resident accidentally spilled hot coffee on her chest and developed a blister on her chest several hours later. (Resident #1) The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Osteoporosis, Arthritis, Dementia, Muscle weakness, and CVA with left side weakness. A care plan with a revision date of 08/20/23 documented in part, Focus- [Resident #1] had an activity of daily living self-care performance deficit related to impaired balance [and] limited mobility .Intervention [Resident #1] requires set up with meals . A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status summary score of 9 indicating that the resident had a moderately impaired cognitive status. Additionally, the resident was coded for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews for one (1) of 21 sampled residents, facility staff failed to report the results of an investigation of a resident elopement to the State Survey Agency within five (5) working days. (Resident #24) The findings included: An undated facility policy titled 'Wandering and Elopements' documented, The community will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Dementia, Syncope, Anxiety, Breast Cancer and Right Foot Fracture. An Elopement Evaluation dated 08/28/24 revealed that the facility coded the resident with an Elopement Risk Score of 9.0, indicating the resident was moderately at risk of eloping and it documented the following: 3. Does the resident have a history of elopement or attempted leaving the facility without informing staff? a. Yes. A Care Plan dated 08/28/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to report the results of all investigations to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident for three (3) of 21 sampled investigations. (Residents' #1, #18, and #24) The findings included: 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Dementia, CVA with left sided weakness, Osteoporosis, Arthritis, and Muscle weakness. A Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation form dated 04/06/24 at 2:40 PM documented in part, Resident observed with swollen left hand, elbow and forearm. Presented with pain and withdraw affected areas to touch, medicated with scheduled Acetaminophen with slight effect. Collaborated with [physician's name] who made an assessment and x-ray ordered to left hand, forearm and left elbow due to pain and swelling . A nursing note dated 04/07/24 at 11:18 AM documented in part, patient alert and verbally responsive, able to make needs known, nurse noted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 21 sampled residents, facility staff failed to complete a Level I PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) to determine if the resident had or may have had an MD (mental disability), ID (intellectual disability), or related condition for a resident that remained in the facility as a long-term care resident for longer than 30 days. Resident #15. The findings included: A review of a Level I Pre-admission Screen/Resident Review form dated 05/23/22 revealed that 'Section A' of the form documented that the resident's requirement for nursing facility services and length of stay would be less than 30 days and the remaining sections were incomplete, including Section E: Dementia which was left blank. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Dementia, Bipolar Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder and Anxiety. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented: facility staff coded a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation record reviews and staff interviews, for one (1) of 21 sampled residents, the physician failed to review a resident's total program of care, including medications and treatments, after five physician visits. Subsequently, a resident's blood pressure medication order was not clarified and corrected from 11/04/24 to 02/05/25. Resident #4 The findings included: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Dementia, Convulsions, Hypertension, Affective Mood Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Difficulty in Walking, and Generalized Muscle Weakness. A review of Resident #4's medical record showed: A physician's order dated 08/23/24 at 9:00 AM that documented: Metoprolol Succinate Extended Release (ER)[Beta Blocker Antihypertensive] Oral Tablet 24 Hour 25 milligram (mg). Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Hypertension. Hold for systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than 110 or heart rate (HR) less than 60. Administer with Metoprolol 50 mg tablet for total Metoprolol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, for one (1) of 21 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to ensure that all licensed nurses had the specific competencies, and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs. Resident #4. The findings included: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Dementia, Convulsions, Hypertension, Affective Mood Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Difficulty in Walking, and Generalized Muscle Weakness. A review of Resident #4's medical record showed: A physician's order dated 08/23/24 at 9:00 AM that documented: Metoprolol Succinate Extended Release (ER) Oral Tablet 24 Hour 25 milligram (mg). Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Hypertension. Hold for systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than 110 or heart rate (HR) less than 60. Administer with Metoprolol 50 mg tablet for total Metoprolol 75 mg daily. This order was discontinued on 11/4/2024. A physician's order dated 08/23/2024 at 9:00 that documented: Metoprolol Succinate Extended…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview for one (1) of 21 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that a resident's medication was properly labeled, as evidenced by an opened multi-dose bottle of a liquid supplement that was undated inside the resident's medication drawer. (Resident #4) The findings included: A facility policy titled 'Medication Storage in the Facility' with a revised date of August 2014 documented: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier and D. When the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial is initially broken, the container or vial will be dated. 1) The nurse shall place a date opened sticker on the medication and enter the date opened and new date of expiration (Note: the best stickers to affix contain both a date opened and expiration notation line). Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Dementia, Seizures, Dilated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to prepare, and distribute foods under sanitary condition, as evidenced by one (1) of one (1) open, and expired eyewash solution in the east-wing kitchen, one (1) of one (1) dishwashing machine in the east-wing kitchen that was leaking, one (1) of one (1) empty paper towel dispenser in the east-wing kitchen, one (1) of one (1) broken paper towel dispenser in the west-wing kitchen, one (1) of one (1) expired eyewash solution in the west-wing kitchen, no handwashing soap for one (1) of one (1) handwashing sink in the west-wing kitchen, dust and/or foreign substance accumulation in one (1) of one (1) walk-in refrigerator, and four (4) of four (4) ready-to-eat food packages that were inappropriately stored in the walk-in refrigerator. The findings included: During observations in dietary services on February 26, 2025, at approximately 9:00 AM, the following was observed: 1. A bottle of eyewash solution located in the east-wing kitchen was open and expired as of 09/2024. 2. One (1) of one (1) dishwashing machine in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the facility's records and a staff interview, the facility failed to comply with the State Regulation (22B DCMR section 3211.5) for daily staffing ratios, as evidenced by not providing the minimum daily average of at least six tenths (0.6) hours of resident care per resident by a Registered Nurse for seven (7) of 43 sampled days. The findings included: A review of the facility's daily staffing sheets revealed the following: On 03/30/24 the facility's resident census was 27. In addition, residents received 0.5 hours of direct nursing care being provided by a Registered Nurse. On 03/31/24 the facility's resident census was 27. In addition, residents received 0.2 hours of direct nursing care being provided by a Registered Nurse. On 04/30/24 the facility's resident census was 27. In addition, residents received 0.2 hours of direct nursing care being provided by a Registered Nurse. On 12/25/24 the facility's resident census was 29. In addition, residents received 0.5 hours of direct nursing care being provided by a Registered Nurse. On 12/31/24 the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, facility staff failed to maintain essential kitchen equipment in good working condition as evidenced by one (1) of one (1) dishwashing machine in the east-wing kitchen that squirted a water solution on both sides of the machine during the wash and rinse cycles. The findings included: During a walkthrough of the east wing kitchen at approximately 9:00 AM, on February 26, 2025, one (1) of one (1) dishwashing machine repeatedly spurted a water solution on both sides of the machine during the wash and rinse cycles. During a face-to-face interview on March 3, 2025, at approximately 10:00 AM, Employee #17 acknowledged the findings.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program as evidenced by flying insects that were observed around one (1) of one (1) handwashing sink in the east-wing kitchen. The findings included: During observation on 2/26/2025 at approximately 9:00 am, flying insects were observed around one (1) of one (1) handwashing sink in the east-wing kitchen of the facility. During a face-to-face interview on 2/26/2025 at approximately 9:00 AM, Employee #17 stated that the facility receives pest extermination services from a professional company regularly and as needed. He added he will call the exterminator as soon as possible to address the problem. During a face-to-face interview on March 3, 2025, at approximately 10:00 AM, Employee #17 acknowledged the findings.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-08 · tag F0849 — patternArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews for five (5) of 22 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to ensure that residents had collaborative hospice care plans between the hospice agency and the facility that included a description of the care, services, and frequency of visits to be provided by the contracted hospice provider. (Residents' #13, #17, #16, #21, #27) The findings included: 1. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Dementia, Atrial Fibrillation, Hypothyroidism, and Anemia. A review of a [Physician's order] dated 06/09/21 documented, admitted to [Hospice provider name] for dx [diagnoses] of Cerebral Atherosclerosis. A review of the facility care plan showed [Resident #13 name] is on [hospice provider] care. Last revised 8/20/23. Goal: receives hospice treatment, she will be kept comfortable for quality of life. Interventions: Continue to receive services from [Hospice agency name] as it relates to comfort care and ensuring all medical equipment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents, facility staff failed to notify Medicaid residents when the amount in their account reached $200 of the SSI (supplemental security income) resource limit for both resident's accounting of funds. Residents' #6 and #7. The findings included: According to District of Columbia Department of Health Care Finance, .You may be eligible for Medicaid coverage of Long Term Care (LTC) services, if you: .Have resources up to $4,000 (asset limits) for one person . https://dhcf.dc.gov/service/long-term-care-ltc 1. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the facility Trial Balance record dated 11/03/23, showed a current balance of $4,296.15 for Resident #6. 2. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the facility Trial Balance record dated 11/03/23, showed a current balance of $4,497.67 for Resident #7. A face-to-face interview was conducted on 12/06/23 at 1:00PM with Employee#2, [Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0570 — isolatedAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide adequate surety bond coverage to assure the security of all residents' personal funds deposited with the facility. The Resident census on the first day of the survey was 30. The findings included: A review of the Surety Bond dated the effective date of 05/06/23, and expiration date of 05/06/24, shall be continued until canceled by the Surety Provider .or the Oblige (the Facility) in the amount of $100,000.00. A review of the Resident Funds Trust Account RMFS (Resident Fund Management Service) statements for 08/01/23, to 10/03/23, revealed the following bank account balance: Totaled for statements dated: August 2023 = $123,976.18 September 2023 = $124,237.60 October 2023 = $124,359.08 There was no evidence that the facility staff maintained a surety bond to cover the amount of funds in the resident funds account for August 2023 - October 2023. During a face-to-face interview on 12/07/23, at approximately 12:20 PM with Employee #2. She acknowledged the findings.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, resident representative, and staff interviews, for one (1) of 22 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to show documented evidence of notifying Resident #2's responsible party of a change in the resident's medical status on 12/01/22 and of the residents unwitnessed fall that occurred on 01/29/23. The findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status with a revision date of 02/2021, instructs staff to do the following: .Unless otherwise instructed by the resident, a nurse will notify the resident's representative when: the resident is involved in any accident or incident that results in an injury including injuries of an unknown source; .Except in medical emergencies, notifications will be made within twenty-four (24) hours of a change occurring in the resident's medical/mental condition or status . Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses that included Dementia, Primary Generalized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews for one (1) of 22 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to implement its written policies and procedures for allegations of potential abuse neglect as evidenced by the facility staff failing to show documented evidence of conducting a thorough investigation into a residents fall. (Residents #135) The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Accident and Incident Report with a revision date of 10/2019, documented All accidents or incidents involving residents will be documented on the Accident/ Incident Report Form .The Nurse Supervisor or Charge Nurse shall initiate and complete an Accident/incident form at the time of the incident. The following data will be documented on the incident form .brief description of incident -facts only, no assumptions should be made. Document only what is observed A review of a facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation Reporting and Investigating with a revision date of 4/2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews for one (1) of 22 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to show documented evidence of conducting a thorough investigation into a residents fall. (Resident #135) The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Accident and Incident Report with a revision date of 10/2019, documented All accidents or incidents involving residents will be documented on the Accident/ Incident Report Form .The Nurse Supervisor or Charge Nurse shall initiate and complete an Accident/incident form at the time of the incident. The following data will be documented on the incident form .brief description of incident -facts only, no assumptions should be made. Document only what is observed A review of a facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation Reporting and Investigating with a revision date of 4/2023, documented .If resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source is suspected, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews for one (1) of 22 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to provide written notice of the bed hold policy to include the number of bed hold days to the resident or their responsible party upon transfer to the emergency room. (Resident #135) The findings Included: Resident #135 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses that included Unspecified Fracture of Right Femur, Subsequent Encounter for Closed Fracture with Routine Healing, Repeated Falls, Syncope and Collapse. A review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) DC#00011029, submitted by the facility to the State Agency on 10/13/22, documented .At about 9.10 pm, resident was observed lying on the floor in her room (on her Back side) with face up. Head to toe assessment done. No injury or skin issues noted. Resident complain of pain and medicated with PRN (as needed) pain medication . A review of Resident #135's medical record revealed the following: [Health Status Note] 10/12/22 at 10:37…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews for one (1) of 22 sampled residents facility staff failed to accurately code a resident for hospice on a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. Resident #21. The findings included: Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Unspecified Dementia, Non-traumatic Brain Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety, Weakness, Heart Disease, Fracture of Left Femur, and Unspecified Fall of Subsequent Encounter. A review of Resident #21's medical record revealed the following: An informed consent form dated 06/24/22 and signed by the Resident's representative for the resident to start hospice services. A physician's order dated 06/25/22 at 4:07 PM that documented: Admit to [Name of Hospice] for hospice services. Diagnosis: Cerebral Arthrosclerosis. Please call [Name of Hospice] at [Hospice Phone Number]. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status Summary score of 03…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews for one (1) of 22 sampled residents facility staff failed to update and revise the care plan with resident-centered goals for one (1) resident's use of bilateral hand palm protecters. (Residents' #1). The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses that included: Osteoarthritis, Right-Hand Contracture, and Left-Hand Contracture. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed that the facility staff coded the resident as having a Brief Interview for Mental Status Summary score of 00 indicating the resident had severely impaired cognition, required extensive assistance for all ADL (assisted daily living) care, and had upper extremity impairment on both sides. A review of a [Physician's Order] dated 11/28/23 at 3:00 PM documented: Patient to wear left and right palm protectors for 4-5 hours a day. On 11/28/23 at 3:13 PM Resident #1 was observed by the Surveyor awake and lying-in bed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews for two (2) of 22 sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision consistent with a resident's needs, goals, and care plan to reduce the risk of an accident, subsequently, a resident had an unwitnessed fall; facility staff failed to ensure a resident who was identified as having a high fall risk on admission received adequate supervision to prevent injury of unknown origin. Subsequently, the resident was observed with discoloration on her right eyelid and a raised area around her eyebrow; and the facility failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards as evidenced by three (3) of 51 oxygen tanks that were unsafely stored in the oxygen storage room on the [NAME] side of the facility. (Residents' #11 and #22.) The findings included: 1.Facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision consistent with Resident #11's needs, goals, and care plan to reduce the risk of an accident, subsequently, the resident had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews for one (1) of 22 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to show documented evidence of reconciling Resident #27's prescribed controlled substance medication with the Pharmacy delivery staff on multiple occasions; and failed to record when controlled substance medication (Fentanyl patches) were received on the narcotic medication reconciliation log for the resident. The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Controlled Substances with a revision date of 5/2023, instructs staff to do the following: .Controlled substances are counted upon delivery. The nurse receiving the medication, along with the person delivering the medication, must count the controlled substances together. Both individuals sign the designated controlled substance record .an individual resident controlled substance record is made for each resident who will be receiving a controlled substance .the record contains: quantity received; date and time received signature of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for two (2) of 22 sampled residents, facility staff failed to acknowledge and/or respond to the pharmacist medication regimen review recommendation. Residents' #6 and #25. The findings included: 1. Facility staff failed to acknowledge and/or respond to the pharmacist's medication regimen review recommendations for Resident #6. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Cerebral Infarction, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Anxiety Disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder. According to the Medication Administration Record Resident #6 nurse staff signed that the resident received the following medications: Vibryd 20mg [milligram], Tamsulosin HCL [Hydrochloride] 0.4mg capsule, Pradaxa 150mg capsule, Bevespi Aerosphere inhaler 2 puffs, Metoprolol Tarte 25mg, Furosemide 20mg, and Novolog 100unit/ml [milliliters] per sliding scale. On the following dates 2/18/23, 5/16/23, and 11/21/23 the monthly Health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident representative interviews for one (1) of 22 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #27 was free from a significant medication error as evidenced by the resident being observed with three (3) Fentanyl patches on at once by the facility's staff and the residents relative. The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Administration Procedures for All Medications with an effective date of 8/2018, instructs staff to do the following: .Prior to removing the medication package/container from the cart/drawer. Check MAR (medication administration record)/TAR (treatment administration record) for order . A review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration-General Guidelines with an effective date of 8/2018, documents the following: .Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses that included Fracture of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, facility staff failed to store and distribute food under sanitary condition as evidenced by expired food items such as 12 of 14, V8 vegetable drinks that were in the kitchen on the East and [NAME] side of the facility. The findings included: During a walkthrough of dietary services on November 28, 2023, at approximately 12:00 PM, the following observations were made: 1. Six (6) of six (6) 5.5 fluid ounces of V8 vegetable drinks stored in the kitchen on the East side of the facility were expired as of July 17, 2023. 2. Six (6) of eight (8) 5.5 fluid ounces of V8 vegetable drinks stored in the kitchen on the [NAME] side of the facility were expired as of October 26, 2023. Employee #6 acknowledged the findings during a face-to-face interview on November 28, 2023, at approximately 12:15 PM.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews for one (1) of 22 sampled residents, facility staff failed to show documented evidence that a skin assessment was completed on admission, documented as ordered by the physician and weekly per the facility policy that accurately reflected a resident's change in skin condition. Resident #18. The findings included: Resident #18 was admitted to facility on 02/23/22 with multiple diagnoses that included: Dementia, Muscle Weakness, Difficulty Walking, Multiple Falls, Hypertension, Kidney Disease, Thyroid Disease and Anemia. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented: facility staff coded a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of '12,' indicating the resident had moderately impaired cognition; and coded the resident's functional status as 2-person physical assistance with toilet use and 1-person physical assistance with bed mobility, transfers, locomotion on/off unit, dressing, eating and personal hygiene. 1A) Facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, facility staff failed to provide a safe environment to residents and staff, as evidenced by three (3) of 51 oxygen tanks that were unsafely stored in the oxygen storage room on the [NAME] side of the facility. The findings include: During an environmental walkthrough on the [NAME] side of the facility on December 1, 2023, at approximately 8:45 AM, three (3) of 51 oxygen tanks were loosely stored upright, on the floor of the oxygen storage room, and presented an unsafe environment. Employee #3 who was present at the time of observation, acknowledged the above findings during a face-to-face interview on December 1, 2023, at approximately 9:00 AM.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews for six (6) of 21 sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide documented evidence that they informed and provided written information on the right to formulate an advanced directive to residents or their representatives. Residents' #16, #18, #20, #24, #25 and #131. The findings included: 1. Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Fracture of Unspecified Part of Neck of Left Femur, Weakness, Unspecified Glaucoma, Dependence on Supplemental Oxygen, and Non-Alzheimer's Dementia. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed that facility staff coded Resident #16 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 00, indicating that the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed the following: A face sheet which documented that the resident had a representative. 05/25/22 [Physician's order] documented, Full Code. There was no documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one (1) of three (3) Beneficiary Notices contained sufficient information to ensure that the resident and/or responsible party had sufficient time to appeal the facility's decision to terminate Medicare services (Resident #133). The findings included: Resident #133 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses included the following: Discitis of the Cervical Region, Spinal Stenosis, Unspecified Injury of the Neck, and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that facility staff coded Resident #133 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 14, indicating that the resident had intact cognition. Review of the instruction on the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) stipulates, How to ask for an Immediate Appeal .Your request for an immediate appeal should be made as soon as possible, but no later…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for one (1) of 21 sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide written notification to the resident or resident representative of the bed hold policy and the number of bed hold days remaining following residents transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #132 The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed-Holds and Returns date revised 04/19, revealed .Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy . Resident #132 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included the following: Unsteadiness on feet, Muscle Weakness, and Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3 Unspecified. Review of a admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that facility staff coded Resident #132 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 14 indicating that he was cognitively intact. Review of an intake for a Facility Reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview for one (1) of 21 sampled residents, facility staff failed to implement Resident #25's person-centered comprehensive care for contractures. The findings included . Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Generalized Muscle Weakness and Contracture of Right Hand and Contracture of Left. Review of a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that facility staff coded Resident #25 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 00, indicating that the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Under Section G (Functional Mobility), facility staff coded the resident as requiring extensive assistance for bed mobility, dressing, eating, and personal hygiene. Facility staff coded the resident as being totally dependent on staff for transfers, and toilet use. Facility staff coded that the resident had limited range of motion due to impairment on both sides to the upper and lower extremities.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, facility staff failed to ensure that the nurse's care and services for verification of shift count for narcotics drugs met the professional standard of practice. The findings included: According to All Care Pharmacy .All controlled substances . must be counted at each shift change. Both the oncoming and outgoing nurse should look at the card and the narcotic book to ensure accuracy . www.allcarepharmacy.com/facilityresources/assets/documents/Controlled A review of the facility Control Drugs Verification Count /Shift Count Sheet for Narcotics book on August 24, 2022, showed that the space allotted for (1) correct drug count -yes/no, (2) Balance verified by a nurse coming on duty (one signature only), (3) Balance verified by a nurse going off duty (one signature only) was being signed by one nurse in both space or is being left blank. This indicated, That professional standard of practice were not being met. During a face-to-face interview conducted with Employee #10 [East medication nurse] on 08/22/22 at 11:12 AM and Employee #6 [West…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for one (1) of 21 sampled residents, facility staff failed to develop and complete a discharge plan for Resident #31 that was planning to return to the community. The findings included: Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses that included the following: Presence of Left Artificial Knee Joint, Syncope and Collapse and Pain in Unspecified Joint. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed that the facility staff coded the following: In section C (Cognitive Patterns) Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score 15 was coded indicating intact cognition. In section Q (Participation in Assessment and Goal Setting) Expects to be discharged to the community Review of the social services progress notes documented the following: 05/31/22 at 12:47 PM . (Resident #31's) discharge care plan meeting will be held on 6-1-22 at 12PM, as she will be transferring back to AL (Assisted Living) with her husband . 06/01/22 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interview, for one (1) of 21 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion. Resident #25. The findings included: Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Generalized Muscle Weakness and Contracture of Right Hand and Contracture of Left. Review of a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that facility staff coded Resident #25 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 00, indicating that the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Under Section G (Functional Mobility), facility staff coded the resident as requiring extensive assistance for bed mobility, dressing, eating, and personal hygiene. Facility staff coded the resident as being totally dependent on staff for transfers, and toilet use. Facility staff coded that the resident had limited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews for two (2) of two (2) nursing units, the facility staff failed to ensure that the system used for an acceptable standard of practice to account for the receipt, usage, disposition, and reconciliation of controlled medications was followed. The findings included . 1. A review of the Shift count Narcotic records on Unit East was completed on August 24, 2022, at approximately 9:10 AM, and it showed the following activity in the Narcotic reconciliation record for the following dates: 4/11/2022 3-11 shift same nurse signed coming on and going off duty 4/15/2022 3-11 shift nurses coming on duty [blank] and 11-7 going off duty [blank] 4/26/2022 3-11 shift same nurse signed coming on and going off duty 5/8/2022 11-7 shift same nurse signed coming on and going off duty 5/22/2022 11-7 shift same nurse signed coming on and going off duty 6/20/2022 11-7 shift same nurse signed coming on and going off duty 7/12/2022 11-7 shift same nurse signed coming on and going off duty 7/30/2022 11-7 shift same nurse signed coming on and going off duty 8/13/2022…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, facility staff failed to store and prepare foods in accordance with professional standards of practice for food services safety as evidenced by food items such as one (1) of one (1) one-gallon plastic bag with cubed pieces of ham, one (1) of one (1) container of cooked chicken wings, one (1) of one (1) one-gallon container of slaw dressing, and one (1) of one (1) one-gallon container of sweet pickle relish, that were not labeled or dated, pieces of flounder fish that were improperly being thawed, and boxes of ice cream and muffins that were inappropriately stored in one (1) of one (1) walk-in freezer. The findings included: During a walkthrough of the facility's kitchen on August 22, 2022, at approximately 10:00 AM, the following observations were made: 1. Food items in the walk-in refrigerator such as one (1) of one (1) one-gallon plastic bag with cubed pieces of ham, one (1) of one (1) container of cooked chicken wings, one (1) of one (1) one-gallon container of slaw dressing, and one (1) of one (1) one-gallon container of sweet pickle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for one (1) of 21 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #131's medical record did not contain inaccurate information as evidenced by staff documenting resident did not have any falls in the past 3 months on multiple falls assessment despite the resident having a documented history of falls in the medical record. Resident #131 The findings included: Resident #131 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that include the following: Fracture of Unspecified Part of Neck of Right Femur, Unspecified Dementia Without Behavioral Disturbance, Subsequent Encounter and Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Infection . Review of a admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that facility staff coded Resident #131 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 09, indicating that the resident's cognition is moderately impaired. Review of resident's hospital discharge documents in the medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview for one (1) of 21 sampled residents, facility staff failed to wear the required PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) when entering a resident's room and providing care for a resident that was on contact precautions due to MRSA (Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus). Resident #131 The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program date revised 12/19, revealed the following: .Prevention of infection a. important facets of infection prevention include: (2) instituting measures to avoid complications or dissemination .educating staff and ensuring that they adhere to proper techniques and procedures; .(4) communicating the importance of standard precautions and cough etiquette to visitors and family members; .(7) Implementing appropriate isolation precautions when necessary; and (8) following established general and disease -specific guidelines such as those if the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) .The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$39,419 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $14,082 — penalty dated 2025-03-26
- $25,337 — penalty dated 2023-12-08
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BARTELS, BRUCE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 03/04/2015 |
| CECCHINE, MARGARET | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/2023 |
| COX, SALLY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2018 |
| GLECKMAN, HOWARD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2024 |
| HAUGE, JENNIFER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2022 |
| JOHNSON, GREGG | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2021 |
| KATZ, RUTH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2024 |
| KEARNEY, JONATHAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/01/2025 |
| KREUTZER, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2018 |
| KUHN, NANCY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/07/2015 |
| MAGIDSON, PHILLIP | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2023 |
| MASSEY, NATHANIEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2025 |
| ORTIZ, ELIZABETH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2025 |
| SHARKEY, JOAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/11/2011 |
| WAGNER, STEVEN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2017 |
| ALLEY, TRACI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 08/02/2021 |
| DELOVSKA-TRAJKOVA, DUSANKA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2013 |
| GORDON, NANCY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2025 |
| O'CONNOR, LYNN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/01/2010 |
| SILVERBLOOM CONSULTING, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2021 |
| BASILE, JASON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/24/2022 |
| GREEN, LYNN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/14/2024 |
| MASSETTI, AMANDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/11/2020 |
| MOUR, CHRISTINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/24/2015 |
| QUARLES, SHIRLEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/02/2024 |
| SWEENEY, NATHANIEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/17/2025 |
| BAKER TILLY ADVISORY GROUP LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2015 |
| BAKER TILLY US LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2015 |
| FLAGSHIP REHABILITATION, INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2015 |
| MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2015 |
| MEDICAL SOLUTIONS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| RICHTER AND ASSOCIATES | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/10/2015 |
| SUMMER HEALTH INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2024 |
| ULTIMATE HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2023 |
| BURGESS, JACQUELINE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/10/2025 |
| ISANG, GRACE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/25/2024 |
| NAQVI, FATIMA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/03/2025 |
| WILSON, EILEEN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/29/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 44 rows in the source record cover these 38 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in DC
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the District of Columbia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner. The starred figure is the national median (no state figure published).
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 095028. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.